GNU logs - #70326, boring messages


Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#70326: 30.0.50; Backup Files documentation does not match observed behaviour
Resent-From: Markus Triska <triska@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 18:11:03 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.70326.B.171277262910927 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: report 70326
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: 70326 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.171277262910927
          (code B ref -1); Wed, 10 Apr 2024 18:11:03 +0000
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Apr 2024 18:10:29 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54346 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1rucOy-0002qA-Go
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:10:29 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:50724)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <triska@HIDDEN>) id 1rucOu-0002oM-BA
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:10:26 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <triska@HIDDEN>)
 id 1rucOf-0001Lo-VN
 for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:10:09 -0400
Received: from [78.47.144.35] (helo=metalevel.at)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <triska@HIDDEN>) id 1rucOd-0005wg-Ou
 for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:10:09 -0400
Received: from mts-Mac-mini.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by metalevel.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A9D39C751
 for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 20:02:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mts-Mac-mini.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 501)
 id 6A7762E71B08; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 20:24:53 +0200 (CEST)
From: Markus Triska <triska@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 20:24:53 +0200
Message-ID: <m2frvtf53e.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 78.47.144.35 (failed)
Received-SPF: none client-ip=78.47.144.35; envelope-from=triska@HIDDEN;
 helo=metalevel.at
X-Spam_score_int: -10
X-Spam_score: -1.1
X-Spam_bar: -
X-Spam_report: (-1.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_NONE=0.793,
 SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

In 19.3.2 Backup Files, we read:

   "Emacs makes a backup for a file only the first time the file is saved
    from a buffer."

However, when I launch Emacs with:

    $ emacs -Q

and then do:

    C-x C-w backup.txt RET

then the file is saved from the buffer as expected, and Emacs tells me:

    "Wrote .../backup.txt"

However, even though this is the first time the file is saved from a
buffer, no backup for a file is created, and buffer-backed-up is nil.

If possible, could you please consider rephrasing the documentation so
that it accurately describes the cases where a backup file is created,
or alternatively adapt the behaviour so that it matches the current
documentation?

Thank you and all the best,
Markus

In GNU Emacs 30.0.50 (build 1, x86_64-apple-darwin18.2.0, X toolkit,
 cairo version 1.17.6, Xaw scroll bars) of 2023-09-11 built on
 mac
Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.12011000
System Description:  Mac OS X 10.14.2




Message sent:


Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Markus Triska <triska@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#70326: Acknowledgement (30.0.50; Backup Files documentation
 does not match observed behaviour)
Message-ID: <handler.70326.B.171277262910927.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <m2frvtf53e.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 70326
X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs
Reply-To: 70326 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 18:11:05 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 70326 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
70326: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D70326
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems


Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#70326: 30.0.50; Backup Files documentation does not match observed behaviour
Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 18:30:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.70326.B70326.171277375021511 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 70326
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Markus Triska <triska@HIDDEN>
Cc: 70326 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 70326-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B70326.171277375021511
          (code B ref 70326); Wed, 10 Apr 2024 18:30:02 +0000
Received: (at 70326) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Apr 2024 18:29:10 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54374 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1ruch3-0005ak-OH
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:29:10 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58488)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>)
 id 1ruch0-0005Z3-C3; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:29:08 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>)
 id 1rucgl-0000Hy-Er; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:28:51 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
 mime-version; bh=hFttxS97sGqMICVu9ZQTulSlKVyOPY+fLw0KiE0hXao=; b=pEI9s+FDJcNn
 capWJdKhkmJtC//j6JmlarKTg7qVkm7mG1qhNSwSds74zMfMKwUdfjRxxFYteHqwvrzap4F6+cnwR
 +Ad6wedkLD2ALSH7mjb00NRTA3AqJ1YKV740ClM8Ny6JWo03aF8NFskpM0qgMORA2VpCyMukqPjwI
 nPw9BLu3UiwliH+CDd7kR5Dj6D1+E3xa/GsDZaj3TIPF7JMNmhxF4Qpjq7aszjkqE74ERxoeqzzH9
 7wTPOhniOImVQg/cdwW4sf5hfDtcUi3oVFgJ9hbD8goBvPlGePZtgWjX8uVvzJFInO1yDHT8LjDdO
 8c0WLIO0URo5pK8maE/J3A==;
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 21:28:47 +0300
Message-Id: <86h6g9ul5s.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <m2frvtf53e.fsf@HIDDEN> (message from Markus Triska on Wed, 
 10 Apr 2024 20:24:53 +0200)
References: <m2frvtf53e.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

tags 70326 notabug
thanks

> From: Markus Triska <triska@HIDDEN>
> Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 20:24:53 +0200
> 
> In 19.3.2 Backup Files, we read:
> 
>    "Emacs makes a backup for a file only the first time the file is saved
>     from a buffer."
> 
> However, when I launch Emacs with:
> 
>     $ emacs -Q
> 
> and then do:
> 
>     C-x C-w backup.txt RET

"C-x C-w" is not "saving the file from a buffer".  "C-h c" says that
"C-x C-w runs the command write-file".  So I don't see anything wrong
with what the manual says.




Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Apr 2024 18:29:14 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Apr 10 14:29:14 2024
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54376 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1ruch7-0005bC-GD
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:29:14 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58488)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>)
 id 1ruch0-0005Z3-C3; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:29:08 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>)
 id 1rucgl-0000Hy-Er; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:28:51 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
 mime-version; bh=hFttxS97sGqMICVu9ZQTulSlKVyOPY+fLw0KiE0hXao=; b=pEI9s+FDJcNn
 capWJdKhkmJtC//j6JmlarKTg7qVkm7mG1qhNSwSds74zMfMKwUdfjRxxFYteHqwvrzap4F6+cnwR
 +Ad6wedkLD2ALSH7mjb00NRTA3AqJ1YKV740ClM8Ny6JWo03aF8NFskpM0qgMORA2VpCyMukqPjwI
 nPw9BLu3UiwliH+CDd7kR5Dj6D1+E3xa/GsDZaj3TIPF7JMNmhxF4Qpjq7aszjkqE74ERxoeqzzH9
 7wTPOhniOImVQg/cdwW4sf5hfDtcUi3oVFgJ9hbD8goBvPlGePZtgWjX8uVvzJFInO1yDHT8LjDdO
 8c0WLIO0URo5pK8maE/J3A==;
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 21:28:47 +0300
Message-Id: <86h6g9ul5s.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
To: Markus Triska <triska@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <m2frvtf53e.fsf@HIDDEN> (message from Markus Triska on Wed, 
 10 Apr 2024 20:24:53 +0200)
Subject: Re: bug#70326: 30.0.50;
 Backup Files documentation does not match observed behaviour
References: <m2frvtf53e.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
Cc: 70326 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

tags 70326 notabug
thanks

> From: Markus Triska <triska@HIDDEN>
> Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 20:24:53 +0200
> 
> In 19.3.2 Backup Files, we read:
> 
>    "Emacs makes a backup for a file only the first time the file is saved
>     from a buffer."
> 
> However, when I launch Emacs with:
> 
>     $ emacs -Q
> 
> and then do:
> 
>     C-x C-w backup.txt RET

"C-x C-w" is not "saving the file from a buffer".  "C-h c" says that
"C-x C-w runs the command write-file".  So I don't see anything wrong
with what the manual says.




Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#70326: 30.0.50; Backup Files documentation does not match observed behaviour
Resent-From: Markus Triska <triska@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 18:55:08 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.70326.B70326.171277526312288 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 70326
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Cc: 70326 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 70326-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B70326.171277526312288
          (code B ref 70326); Wed, 10 Apr 2024 18:55:08 +0000
Received: (at 70326) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Apr 2024 18:54:23 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54381 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1rud5R-0003Am-AK
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:54:23 -0400
Received: from [78.47.144.35] (port=60314 helo=metalevel.at)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <triska@HIDDEN>) id 1rud5A-00035I-3z
 for 70326 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:54:15 -0400
Received: by metalevel.at (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id EFE279C76F; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 20:53:53 +0200 (CEST)
From: Markus Triska <triska@HIDDEN>
References: <m2frvtf53e.fsf@HIDDEN> <86h6g9ul5s.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 20:53:53 +0200
In-Reply-To: <86h6g9ul5s.fsf@HIDDEN> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 10 Apr
 2024 21:28:47 +0300")
Message-ID: <87ttk9ujzy.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes: > "C-x C-w" is not
 "saving
 the file from a buffer". "C-h c" says that > "C-x C-w runs the command
 write-file".
 So I don't see anything wrong > with what the manual says. 
 Content analysis details:   (1.3 points, 10.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 0.0 SPF_NONE               SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record
 1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes:

> "C-x C-w" is not "saving the file from a buffer".  "C-h c" says that
> "C-x C-w runs the command write-file".  So I don't see anything wrong
> with what the manual says.

To reproduce the issue, you can also type a letter and then use C-x C-s
(i.e., save-buffer), and observe the same effect: A backup file is not
created, even though a file is saved for the first time from a buffer.

All the best,
Markus





Last modified: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 18:45:10 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.