GNU logs - #70573, boring messages

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#70573: 30.0.50; Setting gud-gud-lldb-command-name does not take effect
Resent-From: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= <gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 17:58:09 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.70573.B.171406787215090 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 70573 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= <gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 19:56:12 +0200
Message-ID: <m2msphpbr7.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::629;
 envelope-from=gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN; helo=mail-ej1-x629.google.com
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)


1. emacs -Q
2. (setq gud-gud-lldb-command-name "hansi")
3. M-x lldb RET

The new command name "hansi" is not used when prompting the user.

In GNU Emacs 30.0.50 (build 1, aarch64-apple-darwin23.4.0, NS
 appkit-2487.50 Version 14.4.1 (Build 23E224)) of 2024-04-23 built on
 pro2.fritz.box

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= <gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#70573: Acknowledgement (30.0.50; Setting gud-gud-lldb-command-name
 does not take effect)
Message-ID: <handler.70573.B.171406787215090.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <m2msphpbr7.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 70573
X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs
Reply-To: 70573 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 17:58:11 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 70573 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
70573: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D70573
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#70573: 30.0.50; Setting gud-gud-lldb-command-name does not take effect
Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 19:03:13 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.70573.B70573.171407175228047 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= <gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN>
Cc: 70573 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 22:01:38 +0300
Message-Id: <86ttjpz2p9.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <m2msphpbr7.fsf@HIDDEN> (message from Gerd
 =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= on Thu, 25 Apr 2024 19:56:12 +0200)
References: <m2msphpbr7.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

> From: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN>
> Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 19:56:12 +0200
> 
> 
> 1. emacs -Q
> 2. (setq gud-gud-lldb-command-name "hansi")
> 3. M-x lldb RET
> 
> The new command name "hansi" is not used when prompting the user.

It looks like this part:

  (interactive (list (gud-query-cmdline 'lldb)))

is the culprit: the minor-mode, which is the argument to
gud-query-cmdline, should be 'gud-lldb, not 'lldb.  Here's my
evidence:

  (when (and gud-comint-buffer
	     (buffer-name gud-comint-buffer)
	     (get-buffer-process gud-comint-buffer)
	     (with-current-buffer gud-comint-buffer (eq gud-minor-mode 'gud-lldb)))

Btw, this line seems also to be confused wrt the name of
gud-minor-mode:

  (setq-local gud-minor-mode 'lldb)

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#70573: 30.0.50; Setting gud-gud-lldb-command-name does not take effect
Resent-From: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= <gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 19:27:09 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.70573.B70573.171407319412090 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Cc: 70573 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= <gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <86ttjpz2p9.fsf@HIDDEN> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 25 Apr
 2024 22:01:38 +0300")
References: <m2msphpbr7.fsf@HIDDEN> <86ttjpz2p9.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 21:25:48 +0200
Message-ID: <m24jbpp7lv.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes:

>> From: Gerd M=C3=B6llmann <gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN>
>> Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 19:56:12 +0200
>>=20
>>=20
>> 1. emacs -Q
>> 2. (setq gud-gud-lldb-command-name "hansi")
>> 3. M-x lldb RET
>>=20
>> The new command name "hansi" is not used when prompting the user.
>
> It looks like this part:
>
>   (interactive (list (gud-query-cmdline 'lldb)))
>
> is the culprit: the minor-mode, which is the argument to
> gud-query-cmdline, should be 'gud-lldb, not 'lldb.  Here's my
> evidence:
>
>   (when (and gud-comint-buffer
> 	     (buffer-name gud-comint-buffer)
> 	     (get-buffer-process gud-comint-buffer)
> 	     (with-current-buffer gud-comint-buffer (eq gud-minor-mode 'gud-lldb=
)))
>
> Btw, this line seems also to be confused wrt the name of
> gud-minor-mode:
>
>   (setq-local gud-minor-mode 'lldb)

I'm currently seriously confused by gud.el, I'm afraid. And I was
already confused when I tried to mimic gud-gdb here, which does

  (interactive (list (gud-query-cmdline 'gud-gdb)))

  (when (and gud-comint-buffer
	   (buffer-name gud-comint-buffer)
	   (get-buffer-process gud-comint-buffer)
	   (with-current-buffer gud-comint-buffer (eq gud-minor-mode 'gdbmi)))
    (gdb-restore-windows)
    (error
     "Multiple debugging requires restarting in text command mode"))

  (gud-common-init command-line nil 'gud-gdb-marker-filter)
  (setq-local gud-minor-mode 'gdb)

Would you agree that the interactive form should use gud-lldb, but that
the setq-local is right? The setq-local is gud-gdb uses gdb, not
gud-gdb. Or am I confusing myself here?

(Sorry, it's probably too late in the evening for me, or I have compiled
too many LLVM versions today, or whatever.)

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#70573: 30.0.50; Setting gud-gud-lldb-command-name does not take effect
Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 06:30:07 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.70573.B70573.171411299416623 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 70573
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= <gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN>
Cc: 70573 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 70573-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B70573.171411299416623
          (code B ref 70573); Fri, 26 Apr 2024 06:30:07 +0000
Received: (at 70573) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Apr 2024 06:29:54 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33639 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1s0F5k-0004Jj-5i
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 02:29:54 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50816)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1s0F5h-0004Iv-Bv
 for 70573 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 02:29:51 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>)
 id 1s0F5J-0008Us-M7; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 02:29:25 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:
 Date; bh=wll9WaFzbJUBRu/JEnRWYRfmMvfa6SSx0vm3W3/8kPA=; b=PrfY7nnxcE2unCFt+Gg1
 ctxKEGcafIILvN+gGhPOCzQL268JLl+ob3Qtwl2BTEoBaqxEAwctoluhfniVluxQOzxfciYqq+ov0
 C8tifgrqr+sfhIeNWdIwonJvi/u0mxFAmy1GgTOhWejK/YYn56qe6/eBY7eOp6WSDDiMDj7m5djpK
 3awk3e92qjDN5nasR4sfr689xkiDTe3nkwTlRNx61gveWAEwgp72/Wu6lS3S5Z5IKtz7vPQ4sUHE8
 XPZ0TYIbakUKcSQgs1AtB0fEp90uBPTGKN5Intc8IqVxZ1IHt8s9kvcEiFgVYPfCBfnuJn5ywuEbd
 l6Dc2lr8l42IaQ==;
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 09:29:21 +0300
Message-Id: <86pluczlfi.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <m24jbpp7lv.fsf@HIDDEN> (message from Gerd
 =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= on Thu, 25 Apr 2024 21:25:48 +0200)
References: <m2msphpbr7.fsf@HIDDEN> <86ttjpz2p9.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <m24jbpp7lv.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

> From: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN>
> Cc: 70573 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 21:25:48 +0200
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes:
> 
> > It looks like this part:
> >
> >   (interactive (list (gud-query-cmdline 'lldb)))
> >
> > is the culprit: the minor-mode, which is the argument to
> > gud-query-cmdline, should be 'gud-lldb, not 'lldb.  Here's my
> > evidence:
> >
> >   (when (and gud-comint-buffer
> > 	     (buffer-name gud-comint-buffer)
> > 	     (get-buffer-process gud-comint-buffer)
> > 	     (with-current-buffer gud-comint-buffer (eq gud-minor-mode 'gud-lldb)))
> >
> > Btw, this line seems also to be confused wrt the name of
> > gud-minor-mode:
> >
> >   (setq-local gud-minor-mode 'lldb)
> 
> I'm currently seriously confused by gud.el, I'm afraid. And I was
> already confused when I tried to mimic gud-gdb here, which does
> 
>   (interactive (list (gud-query-cmdline 'gud-gdb)))
> 
>   (when (and gud-comint-buffer
> 	   (buffer-name gud-comint-buffer)
> 	   (get-buffer-process gud-comint-buffer)
> 	   (with-current-buffer gud-comint-buffer (eq gud-minor-mode 'gdbmi)))
>     (gdb-restore-windows)
>     (error
>      "Multiple debugging requires restarting in text command mode"))
> 
>   (gud-common-init command-line nil 'gud-gdb-marker-filter)
>   (setq-local gud-minor-mode 'gdb)

I don't think the complications of GDB should concern you.  AFAIU, the
above tries to handle the tricky situation where we have 2 GDB minor
modes: gdbmi and gud-gdb.  There's no such problem with LLDB, AFAIU.

So I think you should copy-cat the other minor modes, like gud-pdb,
which don't have these complications.

> Would you agree that the interactive form should use gud-lldb, but that
> the setq-local is right? The setq-local is gud-gdb uses gdb, not
> gud-gdb. Or am I confusing myself here?

I think both should use gud-lldb, at least that's my understanding.
Look at gud-query-cmdline, gud-val, and gud-symbol, and you will see
that they encode the command name as gud-MINORMODE-SYMBOL, where
SYMBOL is "command-name" in this case.  So if the command name's
symbol is gud-gud-lldb-command-name, then MINORMODE must be gud-lldb,
for this stuff to work.

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#70573: 30.0.50; Setting gud-gud-lldb-command-name does not take effect
Resent-From: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= <gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 06:45:03 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.70573.B70573.171411384927054 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 70573
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Cc: 70573 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 70573-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B70573.171411384927054
          (code B ref 70573); Fri, 26 Apr 2024 06:45:03 +0000
Received: (at 70573) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Apr 2024 06:44:09 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33644 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1s0FJZ-00072H-46
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 02:44:09 -0400
Received: from mail-ed1-x52e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::52e]:45062)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN>) id 1s0FJV-00070D-OU
 for 70573 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 02:44:07 -0400
Received: by mail-ed1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id
 4fb4d7f45d1cf-57255e89facso299639a12.2
 for <70573 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 23:43:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1714113821; x=1714718621; darn=debbugs.gnu.org;
 h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to
 :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=QA+kFLjbGzQQVfERopRWpUmfiOEb8hl5jahkUQKwx7E=;
 b=hyJBOY11+Tm6D4BlKAwGGIF3rI3zkuesXuVmYf1GPkJoYKZ64vGH91TUx4/WR36mGg
 RThj6umUzFRG3E90sjEf36EgfDkdtDh25OHtO7kWoVV4msH2yL1wVo7RS+LeLbyFJjgn
 Xk6NsqBc+G1Ig9Fpwq0rLa54HxXSL7QgA/NA/z6v/bTUhlHLqMGyT+8fpkjCx5tYo1f5
 t58SWiEdRfRiL2Zc4MUG6wW5+tQ5PoguZu+MjJTsw3S327SKMKdMkYboXrhqOyI5C9Pk
 QCJhFlGs4tVzCddfHboPAvztUCSE8RybrbW8QHkFt0BkoWpmkhZhCCl8AE555zOVoBS8
 T2ug==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1714113821; x=1714718621;
 h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to
 :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date
 :message-id:reply-to;
 bh=QA+kFLjbGzQQVfERopRWpUmfiOEb8hl5jahkUQKwx7E=;
 b=Rx2P06q4l2Mw4Oz0OLKd1XdBQ4Eir2NxNIrUXbLP9OBI2z/e44fpR5avF2uC3oQ/rO
 wibjcYPLn5i9KNhyiD5e3Nf8QH0/sSwUNHNxx3+ihcIDs0oxI2dn1q3dwgWJxTf3IOq3
 0pUqny6txjuKsblU/mDF9n4WjuNg5/Kz3QHLtV9Yoq3XcJbmGl9Ic2ndBJZovho9ngAP
 vHX0+WA3gLfD/ozrhZFTYi3BxAEtSBSayZ3IFHkcriW08xl4B3+hQJTwLG4lxmh+2jUo
 ++k1ziq7cP+E9r4ku/4FpZrT2pmj0wuceFZ5j0gvdOkglMYFzP0FUck2fMHqu5KUzl5j
 NUXg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyvwhjE33v6Qe/CAAVTaXxsyK7YUnDisYcA9zFh/pX0BIcT0iIk
 9COGb4NAZN5gYw/c4hxdmqXwfwKNFEFp1SXGu41N/01SerGdSBJhRqPUvA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEO/KyO/nP9qXmRvJ3iAsuLWUbC10SW58SFI0sf5ErXiWPnW6QOrgE/KqIIBZ/BzBX4zdINWA==
X-Received: by 2002:a50:cd15:0:b0:56e:2452:f867 with SMTP id
 z21-20020a50cd15000000b0056e2452f867mr1237539edi.37.1714113821139; 
 Thu, 25 Apr 2024 23:43:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pro2.fritz.box (p4fe3a4eb.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.227.164.235])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 c4-20020a056402100400b005720caa01easm5243626edu.69.2024.04.25.23.43.40
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Thu, 25 Apr 2024 23:43:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= <gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <86pluczlfi.fsf@HIDDEN> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 26 Apr
 2024 09:29:21 +0300")
References: <m2msphpbr7.fsf@HIDDEN> <86ttjpz2p9.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <m24jbpp7lv.fsf@HIDDEN> <86pluczlfi.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 08:43:39 +0200
Message-ID: <m2v844oc84.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes:

>> Would you agree that the interactive form should use gud-lldb, but that
>> the setq-local is right? The setq-local is gud-gdb uses gdb, not
>> gud-gdb. Or am I confusing myself here?
>
> I think both should use gud-lldb, at least that's my understanding.
> Look at gud-query-cmdline, gud-val, and gud-symbol, and you will see
> that they encode the command name as gud-MINORMODE-SYMBOL, where
> SYMBOL is "command-name" in this case.  So if the command name's
> symbol is gud-gud-lldb-command-name, then MINORMODE must be gud-lldb,
> for this stuff to work.

Thanks. I'll try to come up with something later today.

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#70573: 30.0.50; Setting gud-gud-lldb-command-name does not take effect
Resent-From: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= <gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 10:32:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.70573.B70573.171412748421949 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 70573
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Cc: 70573 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 70573-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B70573.171412748421949
          (code B ref 70573); Fri, 26 Apr 2024 10:32:02 +0000
Received: (at 70573) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Apr 2024 10:31:24 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34035 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1s0IrS-0005hm-JU
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 06:31:23 -0400
Received: from mail-ej1-x630.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::630]:45516)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN>) id 1s0IrC-0005dJ-Eu
 for 70573 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 06:31:20 -0400
Received: by mail-ej1-x630.google.com with SMTP id
 a640c23a62f3a-a5883518135so228066566b.3
 for <70573 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 03:30:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1714127442; x=1714732242; darn=debbugs.gnu.org;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date
 :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date
 :message-id:reply-to;
 bh=tawqkgeBmlQtheBifB4C06RN7ldkVTqCoZp4/N4gCJQ=;
 b=IWNq2gauM++x9ADBFsJjBca9BgTE5KW+t4F9Ynj+BoGASKZyj5NOTqMuWo7U3Z/l71
 5UGHTGbHIeeJBiOFtHC51f2wQEyK6j2ys6gcuStFvh5QebIwR0RFkgAD+SNKlxPi6ozG
 KR2H0ymIqR2q9z0eCcY3VIWSwV9ufaO9CDQ/gio8zljyjUbu2gAl9oX1pMJTT0FGKGoN
 /IX49IE7PCqu6ne7ktFKUeLkOcqiNDUhJyXSCSttL8WypCzS/0pgdoLos2FFy6CSohhb
 k674FjHF4rA54ttn2TeIaN9UogYa926SYcrmOCKPJu2H87FrmNuLWHUID+4i9+HNE7GY
 da6g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1714127442; x=1714732242;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date
 :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from
 :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=tawqkgeBmlQtheBifB4C06RN7ldkVTqCoZp4/N4gCJQ=;
 b=lEhDUM8o/E3yKj/dAPBNufwx5XyIGv0dedzAjRN2T3fbXeraSyBUcBfwJT3M4HOpXP
 GVtn9uXZ9fEK3/9XjZ6xPYK51mXQf3p6BaSSUFhF/yz89yJOWu4h2QwAgL8kU6e8A6Lj
 CHB5X48Ikk6I3wbnxvOWbnLzvq5I0uARiGRs+RQggM3G1HFHv6+QGp8wZ9FtulDW3i2E
 tEK2PqwZF0kwLW0Mh3cdzOMvO0EheDFHrn0AvT0tXyJ4HT2pQSUQStV82rZPKzwnmjDZ
 xEr4u6Cn05EcrPEqwPkaagiD+nFsPHTQSVTBD98CZcB3oNlG3dWF6hrTleVRyCNFLukA
 dNsA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxs69BU1wSJMsj4Cr6cqKKMLJl8SsT4HijV/AeXJ9jUQe7u8tuP
 /hlWSQ2SMbPsxX8RIopKAZxTy1bGIs2tTL82RBvZ26T2d3/+fVTt0GHZ5Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHhfz+uqYvAaOEfJw9K+zzRqN8xa8B4DDzUMwiLAhsBVg13OFPu+Q8/5tNeU3OsB/GfFL3ztg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:f748:b0:a55:b021:c0b1 with SMTP id
 jp8-20020a170906f74800b00a55b021c0b1mr2121041ejb.9.1714127441674; 
 Fri, 26 Apr 2024 03:30:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pro2.fritz.box (p4fe3a4eb.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.227.164.235])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 q21-20020a170906771500b00a51d408d446sm10482652ejm.26.2024.04.26.03.30.41
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Fri, 26 Apr 2024 03:30:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= <gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <m2v844oc84.fsf@HIDDEN> ("Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?="'s message of "Fri, 26 Apr 2024 08:43:39 +0200")
References: <m2msphpbr7.fsf@HIDDEN> <86ttjpz2p9.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <m24jbpp7lv.fsf@HIDDEN> <86pluczlfi.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <m2v844oc84.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 12:30:40 +0200
Message-ID: <m2ttjomn5b.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Gerd M=C3=B6llmann <gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN> writes:

> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes:
>
>>> Would you agree that the interactive form should use gud-lldb, but that
>>> the setq-local is right? The setq-local is gud-gdb uses gdb, not
>>> gud-gdb. Or am I confusing myself here?
>>
>> I think both should use gud-lldb, at least that's my understanding.
>> Look at gud-query-cmdline, gud-val, and gud-symbol, and you will see
>> that they encode the command name as gud-MINORMODE-SYMBOL, where
>> SYMBOL is "command-name" in this case.  So if the command name's
>> symbol is gud-gud-lldb-command-name, then MINORMODE must be gud-lldb,
>> for this stuff to work.
>
> Thanks. I'll try to come up with something later today.

Pushed a fix to master, and closing. I forgot to add the bug# to the
commit message, though, sorry.

What a wonderful confusion of mine :-/.

Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Apr 2024 10:31:32 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Apr 26 06:31:32 2024
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34038 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1s0Irb-0005iy-TI
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 06:31:32 -0400
Received: from mail-lf1-x12f.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::12f]:54396)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN>) id 1s0Ira-0005i8-7P
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 06:31:30 -0400
Received: by mail-lf1-x12f.google.com with SMTP id
 2adb3069b0e04-5194cebd6caso2253870e87.0
 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 03:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1714127466; x=1714732266; darn=debbugs.gnu.org;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:from:to:message-id
 :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=HmD+vOU0WTLgbQJkm+eqRbBO7NjJ5+MFMJU6fuMpS64=;
 b=BoNDFwI2wYjCHNvGSbBNuV2JEVTXxAu0sGyTk56Bk7Kvdis6H96xSNmD8aOpYpyhqO
 6GgduuIaIMpHVyddoekTYen4vY5Mw+P4bqHh6OE7/6Hu7XetLqtpZHrwNPDiVAKZtc8l
 plfkYgSBmkSEnnl8ItEb8eV/uhMmU7XBqWkxVvgHPi9MrPqLs/u/JO9XsWbk+9bxfL0a
 1I7T6iH4Qvn33NFbNQ/Lu95NOR5Pmx0DaND9xWK+zv/nN0aPJESL8ervdDll6cn/CYmm
 Smk4dcbQ2hOTMW9Z5xI7NJcIfkYk8CksFlwIFcOE4WXwZlZZ0pf3FC87MHfCgT64EcIu
 P9/w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1714127466; x=1714732266;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:from:to:message-id
 :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=HmD+vOU0WTLgbQJkm+eqRbBO7NjJ5+MFMJU6fuMpS64=;
 b=PDuqmwsu6Bj7LDwQvlinPs2nqVwv/iQW8HNSvn5dKNfdxDHwidLPasQigcDin/aM1K
 M7p6GcwmjtdX7m2ZSHr4aejT0oouiH6fx/MfibD4A6HmdGzMQJW17bULQOQYl8kOJz/b
 uhfj19OQIxYR6xhJ4LB0fD225WUcndh+I5Ujrxbtpe6cu+/+P/B+1BMbJnLw0xXRmtJX
 BO0D8QzwWiro1xoJfPkAw9nAQPmQSgAMVY7+cD34OVeqBL7ioAr8SX0pDJ+Qk0jVo3jg
 xheOLfeDLwgXiHcbcNhN1f41lPIwWB1BHlD1E+e8sxVPh/iGrGp5wbV+SC5QJnu9osrs
 pNEA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwIexfGnxYLX7QW32l8cCHeyZLV4s2uHX+aI9bqwK2VItu/xz1L
 XRLYcN5QWKKxO5khBQH8sNzJl5tgRBD7vwH5D3gArnnQdxMdhdKc7ST58d8H
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGb9nKDUviR9K0vNfbHkaN2iCj3Ttn4m/Wx6BKTmWC32Z9tFIDLKzizUjjT4qD2Hpny+EIKIw==
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:532f:0:b0:518:c5bd:cf78 with SMTP id
 f15-20020ac2532f000000b00518c5bdcf78mr1292163lfh.31.1714127465575; 
 Fri, 26 Apr 2024 03:31:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pro2.fritz.box (p4fe3a4eb.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.227.164.235])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 q10-20020a056402248a00b0056fe7c5475bsm9890535eda.10.2024.04.26.03.31.04
 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Fri, 26 Apr 2024 03:31:05 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 12:31:04 +0200
Message-Id: <m2sez8mn4n.fsf@HIDDEN>
To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: =?utf-8?Q?Gerd_M=C3=B6llmann?= <gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN>
Subject: control message for bug #70573
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Score: 2.1 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview:  close 70573 30.1 quit 
 Content analysis details:   (2.1 points, 10.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 no trust [2a00:1450:4864:20:0:0:0:12f listed in]
 [list.dnswl.org]
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
 provider (gerd.moellmann[at]gmail.com)
 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 2.1 MALFORMED_FREEMAIL     Bad headers on message from free email
 service
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  close 70573 30.1 quit 
 
 Content analysis details:   (1.1 points, 10.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
                              no trust
                             [2a00:1450:4864:20:0:0:0:12f listed in]
                             [list.dnswl.org]
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
                             provider (gerd.moellmann[at]gmail.com)
  0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
  2.1 MALFORMED_FREEMAIL     Bad headers on message from free email
                             service
 -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
                             manager

close 70573 30.1
quit

Last modified: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 10:45:09 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.