GNU bug report logs - #70599
join vs. numeric order

Previous Next

Package: coreutils;

Reported by: Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>

Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 05:03:11 UTC

Severity: normal

To reply to this bug, email your comments to 70599 AT debbugs.gnu.org.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org:
bug#70599; Package coreutils. (Sat, 27 Apr 2024 05:03:14 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org. (Sat, 27 Apr 2024 05:03:15 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>
To: bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org
Subject: join vs. numeric order
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 06:55:08 +0800
(info "(coreutils) Sorting files for join") needs to talk about numeric
order.

$ seq 111|join --check-order - /dev/null
join: -:10: is not sorted: 10

So the info manual needs to mention 'Even though your files might be in
perfect "sort --numeric-sort" order, you need to make them into plain
"sort" order first. Sorry. At least you'll get the same number of joins.'

Or, add a new join -n option. The join man page could now say:
'-n: use numeric comparisons. Note sort order also needs to be "sort -n" order.'

And / or mention how the user might tinker with LC_NUMERIC and / or
LC_COLLATE to somehow achieve numeric sorting...





This bug report was last modified 214 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.