GNU bug report logs - #70647
30.0.50; When are :core packages released to GNU ELPA?

Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.

Package: emacs; Reported by: No Wayman <iarchivedmywholelife@HIDDEN>; Done: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@HIDDEN>; Maintainer for emacs is bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN.

Message received at 70647-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 70647-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Mar 2025 02:40:00 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 28 21:40:00 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56461 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1toClk-0003FR-8e
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 21:40:00 -0500
Received: from mail-ed1-x536.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::536]:42291)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <stefankangas@HIDDEN>)
 id 1toClh-0003Er-Sr
 for 70647-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 21:39:58 -0500
Received: by mail-ed1-x536.google.com with SMTP id
 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5e4ce6e3b8cso3504240a12.1
 for <70647-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 18:39:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1740796792; x=1741401592; darn=debbugs.gnu.org;
 h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to
 :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=+vqOy0eOwISvlYooJu6c+hern9MZJhLD9CS9N26RfJs=;
 b=X0MS+DkhotCfLUTf5JB0EO2KUJX3dwN4rD9RIc1KwEEVdBXOyURq6P8quVUfRHJ0fO
 6CUrjl4qThkcykyU3sMn9S+SnOLvsqkX502VkiapDcr2f4tfbOQLJtjXzBPo3XHoTjvO
 x2WIlk6TOBogedjfppDPAc3k8O8VhnB1i7hY3nrkGoyYrvFe3xMibXDw8cwkaj9PMOkd
 sORXR+WkmIoAd3TgPNX8kl6Uk+PT5oy/lgLIxIbUCOg+i+fOUUPVBuEDzlvbMtrQ8OXV
 6PAeY1JaIRA0s7fBjQ+VaUKvURkH8MWmi/nepgSolsXHOHQISec97MZccub7Rc5Yn8Wi
 f6SA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1740796792; x=1741401592;
 h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to
 :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=+vqOy0eOwISvlYooJu6c+hern9MZJhLD9CS9N26RfJs=;
 b=DdaMGdkLx+ZevBKb7uGteIlwZ8YpYU1k7jWoV7jJ65tWeAowlCMYG60Ej+Fc7M1BVM
 CYUhl8Ik09mp9TOQm8+HHuFmA2xsLBh2zF1sONrQaBiw/nl+aCWIXfCoY5vmdbJHbKua
 adwm4WnhOuB998ESL16rh2SAjKepvuP91rgeIXFTzbd9YkkMlicVUiFn8NByisnMUpmK
 vwn8yYGflfKQFC866LBMMq/uKU8HERPVZW/mco8I28Zk6xEcXqqm/fpV+TJBwaKyMr/Y
 rxMCRIdV3OIbgHaR7a321DeOgx2MFstYXEM/V13yDr6k+WeHBXVS77CWR+VkAuVLJK17
 C5Rg==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1;
 AJvYcCWRsUzBGQBW9vGgjWElYE2vLxTeWuTVLNLyOqDorEejpONLSdVA01jXTTgIT+X1otcua6UHVXpQbqW4 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxzfA9gx4xaC+5+zgIFwfrdzPD3XCj4RshFJRklkXLOM8wv2Xzi
 1EXXGQwHAf4+06DQ3svinMv4Drln8Joe25Lqpt8dV32Tw9x/Nwy2iR7oToHdTLtW2YL42MIU1pl
 oebPkzMdq5d3srY9yhKvfne8xhG0=
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncs96wDUmuLdKVZl+Jv3CNlDcYjE87PnSZqPi/RSE452kvxZtQ6VRO12zMFuL3b
 54atVejGPWc9rp3vpT6Fnsp9EzzE5AHYYAVaylE5jEL8ksDlNGdk1DogNQq+fiYgUZB89DP1YoC
 KnLo1iSwc80OAMmJiCTlf4ALWquxI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFWziHA6awCfZodvQ9BsRgM2SLhK5jRUD+ts81vjhGuUhmA3dRknBIo2DLXmrV4NHfjki99jo5Y2o4uDrliF0I=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:354c:b0:5e0:8a34:3b5c with SMTP id
 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5e4d51fef15mr5325967a12.0.1740796791828; Fri, 28 Feb 2025
 18:39:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with
 HTTPREST; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 18:39:51 -0800
From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87y18wkq8k.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <87mspcmj1g.fsf@HIDDEN> <86wmogqper.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87y18wxoll.fsf@HIDDEN> <86sez4qndc.fsf@HIDDEN> <87cyq8dz4h.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <86r0eoqlrn.fsf@HIDDEN> <87y18wkq8k.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 18:39:51 -0800
X-Gm-Features: AQ5f1JpRv1RWoRQlnjstuaE89XM4yYlV7JdAtDlWacH7jR0bn-3quMW3YUIm6HM
Message-ID: <CADwFkmkE+KwmQ7d2HWo7WwP7iS1uGwDuWpjv90dw9vK4OLzquQ@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#70647: 30.0.50; When are :core packages released to GNU ELPA?
To: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70647-done
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>, No Wayman <iarchivedmywholelife@HIDDEN>,
 70647-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

I think the questions here were answered.

I'm therefore closing this bug report.




Notification sent to No Wayman <iarchivedmywholelife@HIDDEN>:
bug acknowledged by developer. Full text available.
Reply sent to Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@HIDDEN>:
You have taken responsibility. Full text available.

Message received at 70647 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 70647) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2024 07:30:19 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 01 03:30:19 2024
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35899 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1s24Py-0002er-W9
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 May 2024 03:30:19 -0400
Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:40087)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <philipk@HIDDEN>) id 1s24Px-0002eh-10
 for 70647 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 May 2024 03:30:17 -0400
Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) 
 by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FEB4240103
 for <70647 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed,  1 May 2024 09:29:50 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017;
 t=1714548590; bh=sMGQBCC88PkG9QGNUAxXbSI8Avp7TuCFuaJnpj5HRXk=;
 h=From:To:Cc:Subject:OpenPGP:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:
 Content-Type:From;
 b=JZIlU33/p3NQT4FRputlwvtKyt8nwXcMm07SChwOu6U+h5wKn995EnFtIUHDTGEME
 u/bZFc4uMmuHmUtCUYkc2zjUNl5Oz9uowpyuRbGGUHb/kRfP8A+4HRWCe+mrWyjXTm
 rBNdeWCume2YpMLaYafVossWNgLI7+SvrAcPXfMUVpdbCXnhpvtaux3WeOaNKE1CNw
 RT0WEjJaihIrEsaCtfMudAj34xFspypFnVnWIShelnhyjFqrEIqGxWVijq6T2VGlEg
 PI1p3PpDA59Fh+j7aa278weriAFVLEuewupq7uNO7GLFe63VVjcP1F0y8+C40UTbxc
 dusbOBCDiV08g==
Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4VTpcF27mkz6txl;
 Wed,  1 May 2024 09:29:48 +0200 (CEST)
From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@HIDDEN>
To: No Wayman <iarchivedmywholelife@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#70647: 30.0.50; When are :core packages released to GNU ELPA?
In-Reply-To: <871q6map91.fsf@HIDDEN> (No Wayman's message of "Tue, 30 Apr
 2024 10:39:38 -0400")
References: <87mspcmj1g.fsf@HIDDEN> <871q6map91.fsf@HIDDEN>
OpenPGP: id=7126E1DE2F0CE35C770BED01F2C3CC513DB89F66;
 url="https://keys.openpgp.org/vks/v1/by-fingerprint/7126E1DE2F0CE35C770BED01F2C3CC513DB89F66";
 preference=signencrypt
Date: Wed, 01 May 2024 07:29:48 +0000
Message-ID: <87jzke56s3.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70647
Cc: Jim Porter <jporterbugs@HIDDEN>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>,
 70647 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

No Wayman <iarchivedmywholelife@HIDDEN> writes:

> PK> When a commit modifies the Version header in the main file, then
> the PK> state of that commit is used to trigger a new release, both
> for core and PK> otherwise.
>

> Where is this documented?

In the ELPA README[0]:

    This cron job only creates a new package when the "version" (as
    specified in the =Version:= header) of a package is modified.  This
    means that you can safely work on the next version here without
    worrying about the unstable code making it to GNU ELPA, and simply
    update the =Version:= when you want to release the new code.

[0] https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/elpa.git/plain/README

> JP> I believe the reason that Eglot's release date is March 31 is
> because that's the JP> day that ELPA itself was updated to include
> Atom feeds for package updates, JP> which re-published all the
> existing packages. See here: JP>
> <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2024-03/msg00777.html>.
>
> PK> There were issues related to some recent changes that re-build the
> PK> package tarballs, but the content should have been the same.  But
> that PK> was a mistake, and not something that should happen on a
> regular basis.
>
> Thanks to both of you for the clarification.
>
> This still begs the question of why the publication date is listed
> rather than the commit date for the tarball.

AFAIK this has historical reasons, that might relate to the old
implementation of the ELPA build server.  It should be possible to
change this now, that all packages have git repositories.

> Imagine if when searching for a film on IMDB the results presented the
> date the IMDB page was last updated rather than the year the film was
> released. e.g. "Ghostbusters (2024-04-15)" for the 1984 film. Not a
> perfect analogy, but it makes the point:
> The tarball publishing date, if displayed at all, should be secondary to the commit date.

I get what you mean, the point is that using the tarball date was just an
easy internal hack to avoid having to re-determine the commit date.
Setting aside issues like those mentioned above, it works well enough.

-- 
	Philip Kaludercic on peregrine




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:
bug#70647; Package emacs. Full text available.

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Apr 2024 14:40:12 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 30 10:40:12 2024
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59734 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1s1oeS-0004Ef-0c
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 10:40:12 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:49564)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <iarchivedmywholelife@HIDDEN>) id 1s1oeM-0004EE-Rd
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 10:40:10 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <iarchivedmywholelife@HIDDEN>)
 id 1s1odw-0001Vy-OC
 for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 10:39:40 -0400
Received: from mail-qk1-x72b.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::72b])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <iarchivedmywholelife@HIDDEN>)
 id 1s1odv-0002te-00; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 10:39:40 -0400
Received: by mail-qk1-x72b.google.com with SMTP id
 af79cd13be357-78f05e56cb3so353285785a.1; 
 Tue, 30 Apr 2024 07:39:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1714487977; x=1715092777; darn=gnu.org;
 h=mime-version:message-id:date:cc:user-agent:references:in-reply-to
 :subject:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=4bnqKJagEQhmZPgZPuF0/Gg9uFC74uAvrITtVRh89h8=;
 b=NDJLH/DsMWHsUYgDcanMlMqFrx4BVZ4eDzap/ziIZ04P0olPrxgQlDQLtl24S5mXQC
 O0KWaK7yViHY5ZPxa6XlWaWgkC3Cn6IxypLhxxpvFI2DqKmZZE8aB5YlS3AN1iY9ZX8f
 i+KqzfwQyZyljLgY9nZUzz+WiOVMwIWg97qgkzj4U2ofdlYY82/H9AyHaBEmZNCX0IQk
 IRO+30i4w9W19GA1/Zw0PAPiw35AVmqfH1HoThbJOd5/TzhlXoLR1YZ6em8wrUdBoRfe
 zwgDAPhP5njz/GpAyP0mLOlvNdpP8Q9zofpMK9gitdTNW3+8CXPHdte4IkFkNXJ7+iGM
 aB7w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1714487977; x=1715092777;
 h=mime-version:message-id:date:cc:user-agent:references:in-reply-to
 :subject:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date
 :message-id:reply-to;
 bh=4bnqKJagEQhmZPgZPuF0/Gg9uFC74uAvrITtVRh89h8=;
 b=TXiZbWLc/KRzZtKOb2/1a64WlcVuqgCPeuGDUPEAQYq+x+cviTDEea+fG2zONn3M1F
 LSa8ymiuGs1CAWe9I9z5D4r7FxlecU5KjD05UxNufDONErEujWmSzXZ5vurOXs5Cgxa/
 IGBWsXPrxLFewe363txOgsSL89PEBt/3cire0sYhGtXexHQUoQ+8pgxNX1zuiPCcW40t
 ePWOYr5Qkh6itho38JnHssDcA17dpCO8zkQprzJUoEf/IQOnmKKxCQmGXjJU98izhUo1
 63nUcprH6vzxbnxJIzUioMcfwNNBrqC4Y094uY0zHN87ixwRR69OpfVQY7GuKOVco/X4
 Bbtg==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1;
 AJvYcCXt5dqilnxtP7Np7s9yqBgA4B4KnsKiNqP4KgfrXhWyu9NA9HwNpd91FwMUUgzfpwJSBnf7+xtXeQTfMbI=
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx5dA5e9fV5FHSlhpN4K6/7U0DZ7VAzdLp+rA0A9MZ3yw/1UFrZ
 OjWcSzun+MGREVJBo6RSHvCKTcYEa9Kt90Anp0Edd3hwOKl3gjJxeZRlUpH/
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE0jeNa/GC78JnO+kSMGTMWz78DG5HY6NJokMmlcwoif3v+ITkwFTYlbvY2iIe8m+iL4d7yIw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:2545:b0:78d:69c8:7ffa with SMTP id
 s5-20020a05620a254500b0078d69c87ffamr17993954qko.46.1714487976827; 
 Tue, 30 Apr 2024 07:39:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from laptop ([2601:84:847f:c697:e217:2894:4724:14f4])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 k9-20020ae9f109000000b0078ede0c25b5sm11458301qkg.23.2024.04.30.07.39.35
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Tue, 30 Apr 2024 07:39:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: No Wayman <iarchivedmywholelife@HIDDEN>
To: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Subject: Re: 30.0.50; When are :core packages released to GNU ELPA?
In-Reply-To: <87mspcmj1g.fsf@HIDDEN> (No Wayman's message of "Mon, 29 Apr
 2024 08:48:27 -0400")
References: <87mspcmj1g.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.4; emacs 30.0.50
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 10:39:38 -0400
Message-ID: <871q6map91.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::72b;
 envelope-from=iarchivedmywholelife@HIDDEN; helo=mail-qk1-x72b.google.com
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
Cc: Jim Porter <jporterbugs@HIDDEN>, Philip Kaludercic <philipk@HIDDEN>,
 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)

 
PK> When a commit modifies the Version header in the main file, 
then the PK> state of that commit is used to trigger a new 
release, both for core and PK> otherwise.

Where is this documented?
 
JP> I believe the reason that Eglot's release date is March 31 is 
because that's the JP> day that ELPA itself was updated to include 
Atom feeds for package updates, JP> which re-published all the 
existing packages. See here: JP> 
<https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2024-03/msg00777.html>.

PK> There were issues related to some recent changes that re-build 
the PK> package tarballs, but the content should have been the 
same.  But that PK> was a mistake, and not something that should 
happen on a regular basis.

Thanks to both of you for the clarification.

This still begs the question of why the publication date is listed 
rather than the commit date for the tarball.
Imagine if when searching for a film on IMDB the results presented 
the date the IMDB page was last updated rather than the year the 
film was released. e.g. "Ghostbusters (2024-04-15)" for the 1984 
film. Not a perfect analogy, but it makes the point:
The tarball publishing date, if displayed at all, should be secondary to the commit date.




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:
bug#70647; Package emacs. Full text available.

Message received at 70647 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 70647) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2024 18:16:56 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 29 14:16:56 2024
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58513 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1s1VYc-0000ma-FG
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 14:16:56 -0400
Received: from mail-pf1-x434.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::434]:45418)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <jporterbugs@HIDDEN>) id 1s1VYR-0000mU-9i
 for 70647 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 14:16:53 -0400
Received: by mail-pf1-x434.google.com with SMTP id
 d2e1a72fcca58-6eff9dc1821so4566313b3a.3
 for <70647 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 11:16:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1714414577; x=1715019377; darn=debbugs.gnu.org;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to
 :content-language:subject:mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc
 :subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=NWmVOe0piL+oWWUs6KqWMwXdmW2hztJTWGWqVPixjCE=;
 b=Z9RQlX2O/SZcDd6kr2fH9Tw52q7vOZ1Ejpf8XwdVuTkUslIwiWNWudH2Skb0+nDdiH
 lYlQ/2Y/oVAumawH2/bVFzuC5fBLVRwwn9YAcUmHnW1ya4McS39JRjSDjbNQbExZpN2g
 clA0zY3ZzQO6FhqdgcfMlyVbm8k/Tc6cyEcc83AncwqPItsiWdZYtqHoUpGsHmpMI1vr
 r8vzIeyQBAyqiS+iCfR1pXvpMOvIWyHNeEvZCTwLjCSFbLXuR4iZoBuS2mWwaeanElb0
 sLPMEEWDXzPnG6wpBppS9C8figaHsZXrBj3GydiyJSL5b8t34+8gJzMZCyS1amWkGDXe
 zGGw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1714414577; x=1715019377;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to
 :content-language:subject:mime-version:date:message-id
 :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=NWmVOe0piL+oWWUs6KqWMwXdmW2hztJTWGWqVPixjCE=;
 b=kIW80Rs1d+W9Whx+iviQV4xgFS0fRTBozmqW9R+jeXmEmKhmOhtg1Cwmcr5SoJ3Y9L
 XqMhOMxPFMU5ufbmHN4HBgi+7XQiMp3yVSwIJAaE9unHXrkZ3RBPjPk5iH4VjiHHUg5X
 9Yi0fNBqNTcpsQcqkpyYJllmwkM3I9Z2pakG73Ez2Me+PXg45xvvJbxiZ7kOYaWp4XkU
 J0RQSAon5m9HCOwpL6B6rl+E+NOScQ0130F+K5riaY/o1O9RO75EbCtLJLI3V1PAGCyJ
 8lo85gF69MjFOAOkxpPHYeyr8v9ZFHn81o0OYBQw0RaQUNl7PVxjOqjRE4+UaEb9giG1
 G2zw==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1;
 AJvYcCVnyl1BkHMwhYNecqvk+GKSrKVAJYZuHGpAfR5Jsco+FSbOzKjR70ITSrOL1ttdmvLeyNqAVNcOgAA8Nt/MsTWUfpsSBkk=
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxhlz1o7qvHeawl+x8hRus48RPTWrTBPeGUTYbcGfELSisUyzG4
 h6wkYxQZmlitAvc2vg9Hd4ymliZ8nCSoQ3bA+7eExh5np2kE+nWz
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHpvUGXaJAbieGoedPEBEi7+qzzudNl36weIKBgV+GJpxX5dJIXt/D9ba5GcqfhC1imCY3B4Q==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a21:3e09:b0:1a8:2cd0:10ef with SMTP id
 bk9-20020a056a213e0900b001a82cd010efmr8464438pzc.22.1714414576978; 
 Mon, 29 Apr 2024 11:16:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([23.240.98.37])
 by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id
 d7-20020a056a00244700b006f0ba1c8ddesm10150383pfj.184.2024.04.29.11.16.16
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Mon, 29 Apr 2024 11:16:16 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <016db49b-ff7d-5dc6-faa5-e90ddd9ae334@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 11:16:15 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: bug#70647: 30.0.50; When are :core packages released to GNU ELPA?
Content-Language: en-US
To: No Wayman <iarchivedmywholelife@HIDDEN>, 70647 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
References: <87mspcmj1g.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Jim Porter <jporterbugs@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87mspcmj1g.fsf@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70647
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

On 4/29/2024 5:48 AM, No Wayman wrote:
> As I understand it, GNU ELPA releases packages when a commit changes the 
> Version package header. GNU-devel ELPA is a rolling release. How about 
> "core" packages? For example, the eglot version bundled with Emacs 29.3 
> is at Version 1.12.xx. The latest version on GNU ELPA is 1.17, released 
> on 3/31/2024, but git points to commit "b014bca833a" on 1/25/2024 as 
> responsible for bumping the version to 1.17.

I believe the reason that Eglot's release date is March 31 is because 
that's the day that ELPA itself was updated to include Atom feeds for 
package updates, which re-published all the existing packages. See here: 
<https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2024-03/msg00777.html>.




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:
bug#70647; Package emacs. Full text available.

Message received at 70647 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 70647) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2024 17:56:28 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 29 13:56:28 2024
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58485 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1s1VEp-0000VY-Td
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 13:56:28 -0400
Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:59083)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <philipk@HIDDEN>) id 1s1VEl-0000VP-0M
 for 70647 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 13:56:26 -0400
Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) 
 by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA912240103
 for <70647 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 19:55:56 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017;
 t=1714413356; bh=Elxin9qpTsLGdrsQwzlc0zFv5PmNtAbTBiHmgnxXmew=;
 h=From:To:Cc:Subject:OpenPGP:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:
 Content-Type:From;
 b=WHsGQcMFt+XpYbr62QNkry66XaO0KBU4mh9Fp6U4KIn5XcYI03JIHLuz8CNXFeFuq
 x0Fwb+wkuK/ooYSf/+wgLH+GySkmlMfT9b1pIdiwA8k8tFl8ZUcLI2hSULv3SeuxvX
 6mFZ0JKbYp99yC1g8G35ZTtePv1THQOtVzyviFmGMlNJl+v6UUurFSU7otMWcXV62f
 4rW8+ytqIkf4CsUUxg4SjztepyOppdtq6r6o9IUS6GZKEq0H4Sxu3yfKfOSXyUDNhZ
 S7SEGqfnhu0i2VkuYMagGR0sndi/hebfdstzKEkta3qYAm4+m4yjyjZahgsjpc+4uv
 /zjdMVcefpgGA==
Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4VSrbc2VS6z6tvZ;
 Mon, 29 Apr 2024 19:55:56 +0200 (CEST)
From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@HIDDEN>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#70647: 30.0.50; When are :core packages released to GNU ELPA?
In-Reply-To: <86r0eoqlrn.fsf@HIDDEN> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 29 Apr
 2024 17:35:56 +0300")
References: <87mspcmj1g.fsf@HIDDEN> <86wmogqper.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87y18wxoll.fsf@HIDDEN> <86sez4qndc.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87cyq8dz4h.fsf@HIDDEN> <86r0eoqlrn.fsf@HIDDEN>
OpenPGP: id=7126E1DE2F0CE35C770BED01F2C3CC513DB89F66;
 url="https://keys.openpgp.org/vks/v1/by-fingerprint/7126E1DE2F0CE35C770BED01F2C3CC513DB89F66";
 preference=signencrypt
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 17:55:55 +0000
Message-ID: <87y18wkq8k.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70647
Cc: No Wayman <iarchivedmywholelife@HIDDEN>, 70647 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes:

>> From: No Wayman <iarchivedmywholelife@HIDDEN>
>> Cc: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@HIDDEN>
>> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 10:25:50 -0400
>> 
>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes: 
>>  
>> > [Why private email?]
>> 
>> Apologies. Must've fat-fingered my reply key binding. 
>
> Looks like you did it again.  Please use Reply All, to have the bug
> tracker CC'ed.
>
> Resending to the bug tracker.
>
>> >> From: No Wayman <iarchivedmywholelife@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 29 
>> >> Apr 2024 09:52:54 -0400  Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes:  
>> >>   
>> >> > Are there any differences in the code between version 1.17 on 
>> >> > ELPA and the Eglot code as of commit b014bca833a. 
>> >>  I would hope not. Otherwise the version information is 
>> >> incorrect. 
>> > 
>> > Then why is this a problem?  File time stamps are immaterial 
>> > with modern VCSes.
>> 
>> The problem is it's confusing.
>> When is the "release date" of eglot 1.17?
>> The date of the commit which bumped the Version header?
>> The date of some other action which triggered an ELPA build?
>> If file timestamps are indeed immaterial, than it would make the 
>> most sense to stick with the commit date which bumped the Version 
>> header.
>> That does not appear to be the case.
>>   
>> >> > What would you like to be documented? 
>> >>  - What triggers a package build/release on GNU ELPA in all 
>> >> cases  
>> >>   (:core or otherwise)? 
>> > 
>> > Philip will tell, but I'm not surprised, given that this is a 
>> > volunteer project. 

When a commit modifies the Version header in the main file, then the
state of that commit is used to trigger a new release, both for core and
otherwise.

>> >> - What triggers a package build/release on GNU-devel ELPA. 
>> > 
>> > What is "GNU-devel ELPA"?
>> 
>> Forgive me if I misspoke, but: https://elpa.gnu.org/devel/

These are rebuilt on every commit.  The intended audience IMO are
developers here though, so that they can easily preview the state of
packages.

>> > <h1> GNU-devel ELPA Packages </h1>
>> 
>> If that's not what it's called, then the website should be updated 
>> to reflect the preferred name.

The name is fine.  I am just guessing that it is not something that Eli
has to deal with that often.

>> > I don't even understand the problem you see here. 
>> 
>> I've seen other package maintainers confused about what/when a 
>> rebuild is triggered. I have reports on Elpaca's issue tracker 
>> where users are confused by the release dates listed on GNU ELPA's 
>> websites. I myself am not 100% sure I understand all cases that 
>> trigger builds. The issue is I could not find a place where this 
>> is all clearly documented.

There were issues related to some recent changes that re-build the
package tarballs, but the content should have been the same.  But that
was a mistake, and not something that should happen on a regular basis.

-- 
	Philip Kaludercic on peregrine




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:
bug#70647; Package emacs. Full text available.

Message received at 70647 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 70647) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2024 14:36:31 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 29 10:36:31 2024
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57572 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1s1S7L-0003X1-5W
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 10:36:31 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34190)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1s1S7G-0003Wr-34
 for 70647 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 10:36:29 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>)
 id 1s1S6p-0004Xx-N4; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 10:35:59 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
 mime-version; bh=6fklFXdGH5yCrHIq6NVsPaOEGf3lpXD2Vhg5m0kCmFA=; b=nUuvVU8f9dRP
 bbQUIZj2wMsqQNTPvp7xCi5Igyv+FAgLim+sy/VO1pWLfd2CrcCkXmGnaJL0QELjjqKLNfljczOQo
 llHquIJVtLmN8NSU7z6110lWUK+neohN5Iq1X/loDRWL/iRC62r+jbGzIV2WyHOuxKDtTlnKljhuM
 niSgSbiSNydRYSU7cb2QycCFv6jb4c0HJrpvjnMTcPoPgq7YtYVx71f81ffvfOvYy67fTrJHENWPk
 ntiHiSsT4O0yWPtjKE4EzwGKnOEOgBkiUbn6RQ8m0QShmAZOPJg1lHL356C8yx4l2HkEA5AZFuJp/
 VqFz8emTa+JHqFfM+DPKQA==;
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 17:35:56 +0300
Message-Id: <86r0eoqlrn.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
To: No Wayman <iarchivedmywholelife@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87cyq8dz4h.fsf@HIDDEN> (message from No Wayman on Mon, 29 Apr
 2024 10:25:50 -0400)
Subject: Re: bug#70647: 30.0.50; When are :core packages released to GNU ELPA?
References: <87mspcmj1g.fsf@HIDDEN> <86wmogqper.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87y18wxoll.fsf@HIDDEN> <86sez4qndc.fsf@HIDDEN> <87cyq8dz4h.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70647
Cc: philipk@HIDDEN, 70647 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

> From: No Wayman <iarchivedmywholelife@HIDDEN>
> Cc: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@HIDDEN>
> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 10:25:50 -0400
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes: 
>  
> > [Why private email?]
> 
> Apologies. Must've fat-fingered my reply key binding. 

Looks like you did it again.  Please use Reply All, to have the bug
tracker CC'ed.

Resending to the bug tracker.

> >> From: No Wayman <iarchivedmywholelife@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 29 
> >> Apr 2024 09:52:54 -0400  Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes:  
> >>   
> >> > Are there any differences in the code between version 1.17 on 
> >> > ELPA and the Eglot code as of commit b014bca833a. 
> >>  I would hope not. Otherwise the version information is 
> >> incorrect. 
> > 
> > Then why is this a problem?  File time stamps are immaterial 
> > with modern VCSes.
> 
> The problem is it's confusing.
> When is the "release date" of eglot 1.17?
> The date of the commit which bumped the Version header?
> The date of some other action which triggered an ELPA build?
> If file timestamps are indeed immaterial, than it would make the 
> most sense to stick with the commit date which bumped the Version 
> header.
> That does not appear to be the case.
>   
> >> > What would you like to be documented? 
> >>  - What triggers a package build/release on GNU ELPA in all 
> >> cases  
> >>   (:core or otherwise)? 
> > 
> > Philip will tell, but I'm not surprised, given that this is a 
> > volunteer project. 
> > 
> >> - What triggers a package build/release on GNU-devel ELPA. 
> > 
> > What is "GNU-devel ELPA"?
> 
> Forgive me if I misspoke, but: https://elpa.gnu.org/devel/
> 
> > <h1> GNU-devel ELPA Packages </h1>
> 
> If that's not what it's called, then the website should be updated 
> to reflect the preferred name.
>  
> > I don't even understand the problem you see here. 
> 
> I've seen other package maintainers confused about what/when a 
> rebuild is triggered. I have reports on Elpaca's issue tracker 
> where users are confused by the release dates listed on GNU ELPA's 
> websites. I myself am not 100% sure I understand all cases that 
> trigger builds. The issue is I could not find a place where this 
> is all clearly documented.
> 




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:
bug#70647; Package emacs. Full text available.

Message received at 70647 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 70647) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2024 13:17:51 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 29 09:17:51 2024
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57226 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1s1QtD-0002T3-2E
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 09:17:51 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46024)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1s1Qt8-0002St-JI
 for 70647 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 09:17:49 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>)
 id 1s1Qsj-000419-0b; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 09:17:21 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
 mime-version; bh=dV/QV39wombG7jlkXC/qsdWCdlZRVyX7Dz5uB0CZimM=; b=lxkIzjJR5KJL
 9VZlutjW/59mO3qP0V3tr76G2XHSVoggRgih0kHIzk/nnxViwaZW7C+WCiAwtEWRkbvpU6bZGfvMm
 CPqfH/1oON7lT430b6Rs0sriqrEPRCdiTKChmTaIyCHFQq0f+EK2Sawvt/lvTAQUpwohZC0rOhcLi
 wKapCCtjgP4XnT5A6Z/XuXEZ1CNQbTJTHIeWlflAaxw1QULqxZiujQDuudqzRuuUJYSA/4T0AqJdk
 NM611aHImWMjpuJuVoeC/2borm3GrGRx0yoYfw9JZoJ7PJP4OVSg9hY1GVbYvzDvOd0Ll1mSitIB0
 hY/lt3kQWkJx24YKIoyH/w==;
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 16:17:16 +0300
Message-Id: <86wmogqper.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
To: No Wayman <iarchivedmywholelife@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87mspcmj1g.fsf@HIDDEN> (message from No Wayman on Mon, 29 Apr
 2024 08:48:27 -0400)
Subject: Re: bug#70647: 30.0.50; When are :core packages released to GNU ELPA?
References: <87mspcmj1g.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70647
Cc: 70647 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

> From: No Wayman <iarchivedmywholelife@HIDDEN>
> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 08:48:27 -0400
> 
> 
> As I understand it, GNU ELPA releases packages when a commit 
> changes the Version package header. GNU-devel ELPA is a rolling 
> release. How about "core" packages? For example, the eglot version 
> bundled with Emacs 29.3 is at Version 1.12.xx. The latest version 
> on GNU ELPA is 1.17, released on 3/31/2024, but git points to 
> commit "b014bca833a" on 1/25/2024 as responsible for bumping the 
> version to 1.17.

Are there any differences in the code between version 1.17 on ELPA and
the Eglot code as of commit b014bca833a.

> Is all of this documented somewhere?

What would you like to be documented?




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:
bug#70647; Package emacs. Full text available.

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2024 12:49:09 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 29 08:49:09 2024
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57088 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1s1QRQ-0002C2-LP
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 08:49:08 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:45174)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <iarchivedmywholelife@HIDDEN>) id 1s1QRN-0002Ay-74
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 08:49:07 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <iarchivedmywholelife@HIDDEN>)
 id 1s1QQx-0007Yy-FZ
 for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 08:48:39 -0400
Received: from mail-qv1-xf29.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::f29])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <iarchivedmywholelife@HIDDEN>)
 id 1s1QQk-0006Ab-Ve
 for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 08:48:39 -0400
Received: by mail-qv1-xf29.google.com with SMTP id
 6a1803df08f44-6a0d1032362so2588966d6.3
 for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 05:48:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1714394905; x=1714999705; darn=gnu.org;
 h=mime-version:message-id:date:user-agent:subject:to:from:from:to:cc
 :subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=ZnIE4lR8c7/v/CsvTuFmxu3uEUmFaPA/jqtnNvcT71Y=;
 b=NcYZPpy8Apmrk7fzG64ZUafNBGiMB0k74cAoTgj6EbNLBIrxASofvb/Cayj7QPuQ62
 AtotXA5QfkbwPprw3WmLddmHd2BH1QxnJ/nQMOLDVnA2gJBLrbjGjiGqBEHM3OKDDzxq
 v0LW915Cv76Pe4QEDG8hK0048wN6oUQHL5nlkZXUHxP8WImp6xy41bnn7GiitjlzDH6z
 qdf8PH8Os/8yZ50ou7PzGbNblc5i+Wj1arLbMqoKTL2lWFBbkYXmRDs8a0OotLHuS7Dh
 7teybgvgdTdUE5BxO0cksBtKEORgH0rFhpwYFZAIo53gZkZ/1zaC4+TgM5T9bLhBFuyy
 bb0A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1714394905; x=1714999705;
 h=mime-version:message-id:date:user-agent:subject:to:from
 :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=ZnIE4lR8c7/v/CsvTuFmxu3uEUmFaPA/jqtnNvcT71Y=;
 b=QjEklOUkZdWJWxGjHsmCAc+WlZ4lcTLkYPp4DdPJmPfeNkIPbvf6WI5RUTVzKYszsO
 RvjTPq+WLqzV9IaHkBEsIHNNhOWX5ltIdMuEvHZ8LstnBlZzO+taI0EgCd+5eVspKwTt
 D1ntVM8ZPqoa/v5ML/ep8tFvT7oXTJutxanFBCnxBvVrlFC9qehp6Fh2c2i3gbuOgHQg
 hip0GqcylqEPpVyuhQnRVjA5ysedQwRRd3hjG5Ap08wWWDW1HW8pomYVnsPxVI4fGfp2
 yFyfyV50HKEjNHqyyxyl2Q27ttdDAnL8F8qHZSjWFz3eHHzsS9H7bstZw1eCgk1rgBiQ
 LKsg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwWNxqEzjeX4VxpNh8CaBkG+dDJWXkXOaPh1N/buG9peUElHpkz
 CNcVzUjRjyW+Q94yl+uMXtL1hvpYbL1S+s8RDVxBlOot92CG5kaq0D0lNA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGt6+8nbjOazhjAAAe7tRDCNSMcLtP+UTIQdIUdsxavVrpQUxSXGwI2+dLTFH5lRuO1pQ/CMA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:2a49:b0:6a0:d56e:4b30 with SMTP id
 jf9-20020a0562142a4900b006a0d56e4b30mr1474902qvb.53.1714394905077; 
 Mon, 29 Apr 2024 05:48:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from laptop ([2601:84:847f:c697:e217:2894:4724:14f4])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 o16-20020a0cfa90000000b006a0c3547211sm1752931qvn.37.2024.04.29.05.48.24
 for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Mon, 29 Apr 2024 05:48:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: No Wayman <iarchivedmywholelife@HIDDEN>
To: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Subject: 30.0.50; When are :core packages released to GNU ELPA?
User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.4; emacs 30.0.50
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 08:48:27 -0400
Message-ID: <87mspcmj1g.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::f29;
 envelope-from=iarchivedmywholelife@HIDDEN; helo=mail-qv1-xf29.google.com
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)


As I understand it, GNU ELPA releases packages when a commit 
changes the Version package header. GNU-devel ELPA is a rolling 
release. How about "core" packages? For example, the eglot version 
bundled with Emacs 29.3 is at Version 1.12.xx. The latest version 
on GNU ELPA is 1.17, released on 3/31/2024, but git points to 
commit "b014bca833a" on 1/25/2024 as responsible for bumping the 
version to 1.17.

Is all of this documented somewhere?




Acknowledgement sent to No Wayman <iarchivedmywholelife@HIDDEN>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN. Full text available.
Report forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:
bug#70647; Package emacs. Full text available.
Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.
Last modified: Sat, 1 Mar 2025 02:45:01 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.