Received: (at 71577-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jul 2024 07:43:57 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 05 03:43:57 2024 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43515 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1sPdbp-0000am-2Z for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jul 2024 03:43:57 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59034) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1sPdbn-0000aW-1E for 71577-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jul 2024 03:43:55 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1sPdbe-0007PL-Sb; Fri, 05 Jul 2024 03:43:46 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=+Lk28zPRW79X6+7rILDRL5SW9ynPZTT4AH73evmvi64=; b=C9NNH1rXWOmRntbxHnYo 7DuxKLNdJ8yux0v1r8DQLznBG6e8AYk0kO7SexHu4sruDycrnNdJub64/ZTYNoqaIq5I4VejW6dGA 4lVU5b3tvPOe75HWqjbDlMQevVLOxTnoe76CEhxMBvrm6iaRiHhYgUd8zbjIY6LojOdEcpqpjR+U1 8odFXNykLGja7U9WTd5LW4+vnWHQAlKN1lDNdleY7zf3EnQSC29JWrQXCbv1PTaJWk8WFAkgLJPIm 3FNrKFHAfLznxKz/VuTdRkR7/tEtcD0k6mKdUvJa7RZQwji8vEXJnqdpESeCywUkBKpBkomVXUoo/ zXJmsKD1UBN1PQ==; From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> To: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#71577: Some Images jobset lack artifacts In-Reply-To: <CAEwRq=pFmUqwEwFZqFfUwwmNwxBUUxUt5zkq39t6_UcQr7d5Fw@HIDDEN> (Vincent Legoll's message of "Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:11:04 +0000") References: <CAEwRq=q3XeJ8E-TYmsEyRb5phX7FuL0k205ah==X2_wuh7nfgw@HIDDEN> <87wmmek9nl.fsf@HIDDEN> <CAEwRq=pM8v6b7ZT+xdmZqWy9ag56CuQcXQct1MtGDFMbdKat9Q@HIDDEN> <87a5j9dqeu.fsf@HIDDEN> <CAEwRq=pFmUqwEwFZqFfUwwmNwxBUUxUt5zkq39t6_UcQr7d5Fw@HIDDEN> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: Octidi 18 Messidor an 232 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9vol?= =?utf-8?Q?ution=2C?= jour de la Gesse X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2024 09:43:44 +0200 Message-ID: <87y16g5ln3.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 71577-done Cc: 71577-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi, Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@HIDDEN> skribis: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 2:54=E2=80=AFPM Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@HIDDEN= g> wrote: > >> There=E2=80=99s no x86_64 QCOW2 image, that=E2=80=99s why. :-) >> > > OK, that's a why, but may I ask why ? I don=E2=80=99t think there=E2=80=99s any particular reason, though one val= id consideration is disk usage. [...] > And to be completely clear, I'm not reporting this issue for myself, beca= use > I built that x86_64 qcow2 image locally and it's woking fine. I just think > the > path of least surprise for people who click on the latest dowload page is= to > find the same as on the release one. Yeah, we should probably consider doing that for symmetry. > Maybe you have decided that it's not worth the computing power usage, > and that would be fine with me. Just close the issue as "wontfix". I=E2=80=99m closing this one but we can track the QCOW2 image issue separat= ely. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#71577; Package guix.
Full text available.
Received: (at 71577) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2024 21:13:05 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jun 25 17:13:05 2024
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37707 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1sMDTH-0006mO-Rb
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:13:05 -0400
Received: from [209.85.215.174] (port=49271 helo=mail-pg1-f174.google.com)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <vincent.legoll@HIDDEN>) id 1sMDSr-0006lc-Le
for 71577 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:12:59 -0400
Received: by mail-pg1-f174.google.com with SMTP id
41be03b00d2f7-6c4926bf9baso4933847a12.2
for <71577 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 14:12:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1719349876; x=1719954676; darn=debbugs.gnu.org;
h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=XsFT4t5Ab+Q6t7VZASKreKBOjnAzY+LFaNyX36q+MgU=;
b=KtOnkPdcDy0QrM1fvhYOroKodjdFTUdzq04JXYe0/9Jb4csyqxctt2cWohTfKbbtyP
282ZDVB35PD5LU2kIZUgD8iRl8zkIaAWMZUWzcYXJQBBJOY9XtzsoANdcucpdO1EsIeO
0eVUZRi7tZY1CTL+/2OSOq7y2UwicfwbvZAdTY/6lpBJxIKQQsz2jh55hirFuJRN4pAk
L5jcecvLO7K9OfBxFjbZDm9j2MLb8xfkt7tFbQotEdwgTHXNsceQ0FzhX6fPN2JV068k
EaxyX6yLGySNtl57YUjZLgk6wUG0v7vuKTOl3mUFxd3G8OVuVpQzcNGfxbr1/DM7ITF8
kKQg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1719349876; x=1719954676;
h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
:reply-to;
bh=XsFT4t5Ab+Q6t7VZASKreKBOjnAzY+LFaNyX36q+MgU=;
b=c2A/28pWySR25tgQ1w6dzyUmEv8XMxXNYFHO/E80cpXL45h/EjcQfiwJF4Gtn/bf1n
AyVgyZUppmgQmsokIThumq7/kv+9+hcwfiFllFtIFARGGPxpJ6c9z0FGbn2zhW3cs9gN
aHv+gms8hJGbfq2K6qVev4fMgSQlIqdvvkZHD0GOd7k0l1FOyB7qRuwybIpTbbZuAXe3
6DiH++jbyrNne9hfPNp5Uz6hzWdrCE8Nu+NByWDlECKbI90FTUD5T9lQOsKhj9qi5esj
MKVtUEG4mNNsROWtUpWHrQB2RM7U2h4K2qeuSugBTBxmsnofBtsRqTHkRuEjoLSgfDb4
llIw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzKd645FMpLiyVmQmkpGVFC6p52uW85u9tt3BEMo43yGTiryfOx
281ewbdu9uvqgM9xiUc3rjZ8dYvOlRa/H1f3UhUD1pIwNnfsmZaFuW2QkkEVuc8XuW8HoOMJTpn
W8CzgBxXGkj26M3cCQnl1jtyznNY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IER3nihBO+d48jPzpgDwNTCDHYsfZMofTWzJ+BWHRhyUOSEuNYqKw7qsCmayAOMZgfJHa2blqjDM0nNzXBGEaw=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:189:b0:2c5:3dbd:58be with SMTP id
98e67ed59e1d1-2c8581cd07dmr8331449a91.14.1719349875769; Tue, 25 Jun 2024
14:11:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAEwRq=q3XeJ8E-TYmsEyRb5phX7FuL0k205ah==X2_wuh7nfgw@HIDDEN>
<87wmmek9nl.fsf@HIDDEN>
<CAEwRq=pM8v6b7ZT+xdmZqWy9ag56CuQcXQct1MtGDFMbdKat9Q@HIDDEN>
<87a5j9dqeu.fsf@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87a5j9dqeu.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:11:04 +0000
Message-ID: <CAEwRq=pFmUqwEwFZqFfUwwmNwxBUUxUt5zkq39t6_UcQr7d5Fw@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#71577: Some Images jobset lack artifacts
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000970867061bbd56b2"
X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Hello, On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 2:54 PM Ludovic Courtès
wrote: > There’s no x86_64 QCOW2 image, that’s why. :-) >
Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
provider (vincent.legoll[at]gmail.com)
0.0 T_SPF_TEMPERROR SPF: test of record failed (temperror)
0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3)
[209.85.215.174 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders
-0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available.
1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
0.0 PDS_HP_HELO_NORDNS High profile HELO with no sender rDNS
0.0 SPOOFED_FREEMAIL_NO_RDNS From SPOOFED_FREEMAIL and no rDNS
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 71577
Cc: 71577 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
--000000000000970867061bbd56b2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello,
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 2:54=E2=80=AFPM Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@HIDDEN>=
wrote:
> There=E2=80=99s no x86_64 QCOW2 image, that=E2=80=99s why. :-)
>
OK, that's a why, but may I ask why ?
I'm not trying to be painful, but, there's the 'release' download page, and
there's the 'latest'.
I was assuming (now I understand that was the wrong thing to do) that
I would find on the 'latest' page the same things as on the release page,
just built with git HEAD code.
> (The bug that was fixed is that the installation ISO and the Hurd QCOW2
> are no longer 404.)
>
Yeah, I followed that, and that's not the "problem" I have, that was simply
a bug that has been fixed, this happens, and it's normal.
And to be completely clear, I'm not reporting this issue for myself, becaus=
e
I built that x86_64 qcow2 image locally and it's woking fine. I just think
the
path of least surprise for people who click on the latest dowload page is t=
o
find the same as on the release one.
Maybe you have decided that it's not worth the computing power usage,
and that would be fine with me. Just close the issue as "wontfix".
Thanks
--=20
Vincent Legoll
--000000000000970867061bbd56b2
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>Hello,<br></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div d=
ir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 2:54=E2=80=AFPM Lud=
ovic Court=C3=A8s <<a href=3D"mailto:ludo@HIDDEN">ludo@HIDDEN</a>> =
wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0=
px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
There=E2=80=99s no x86_64 QCOW2 image, that=E2=80=99s why.=C2=A0 :-)<br></b=
lockquote><div><br></div><div>OK, that's a why, but may I ask why ?</di=
v><div><br></div><div>I'm not trying to be painful, but, there's th=
e 'release' download page, and</div><div>there's the 'lates=
t'.</div><div><br></div><div>I was assuming (now I understand that was =
the wrong thing to do) that</div><div>I would find on the 'latest' =
page the same things as on the release page,</div><div>just built with git =
HEAD code.<br></div><div>=C2=A0</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" styl=
e=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);paddin=
g-left:1ex">
(The bug that was fixed is that the installation ISO and the Hurd QCOW2<br>
are no longer 404.)<br clear=3D"all"></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yeah,=
I followed that, and that's not the "problem" I have, that w=
as simply</div><div>a bug that has been fixed, this happens, and it's n=
ormal.<br></div></div><div><br></div><div>And to be completely clear, I'=
;m not reporting this issue for myself, because</div><div>I built that x86_=
64 qcow2 image locally and it's woking fine. I just think the</div><div=
>path of least surprise for people who click on the latest dowload page is =
to</div><div>find the same as on the release one.</div><div><br></div><div>=
Maybe you have decided that it's not worth the computing power usage,</=
div><div>and that would be fine with me. Just close the issue as "wont=
fix".<br></div><div><br></div><div>Thanks<br></div><div><br></div><spa=
n class=3D"gmail_signature_prefix">-- </span><br><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"=
gmail_signature">Vincent Legoll</div></div>
--000000000000970867061bbd56b2--
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#71577; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at 71577) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2024 14:54:14 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jun 25 10:54:14 2024 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37544 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1sM7Yk-0006Nm-FH for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 10:54:14 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60892) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1sM7Yh-0006NT-F3 for 71577 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 10:54:13 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1sM7Ya-0003EV-Cg; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 10:54:04 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=AKkAOT6xq76sXw5hJFUFicAF+Fa3LjOtcdU7qMJ8N6c=; b=i0slB3HWh7vdkwy/YZUX Tcu8zadiCTfq/+n70LaKL4ohNf8yK7dGw1B4kEZ03eRkOOBqKWyp9WAQY/jUBXegepvOHB/Qv667E MMNxhAcIRscK5bejm3081p6IO15aTEOddtOogLC9wSOl6je79yHIAzOUn5S+JsqgpOjSeAfhetpGs azmD9DjrbZMe3Pih5GTqQVKp73Syf+ugcx5WXQtP0B5nkpk4cq6yUI78wsElRHdT5+XHByog04Ruj rtyZVQ0P/kwMY5ksfXwCyh5LBb3okeoBYkuELuXulFAAsWQZAZAP67WgF/W6g8LJF2EdmGRXc7r4/ MQgfdwcdQle7KQ==; From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> To: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#71577: Some Images jobset lack artifacts In-Reply-To: <CAEwRq=pM8v6b7ZT+xdmZqWy9ag56CuQcXQct1MtGDFMbdKat9Q@HIDDEN> (Vincent Legoll's message of "Mon, 24 Jun 2024 18:30:59 +0000") References: <CAEwRq=q3XeJ8E-TYmsEyRb5phX7FuL0k205ah==X2_wuh7nfgw@HIDDEN> <87wmmek9nl.fsf@HIDDEN> <CAEwRq=pM8v6b7ZT+xdmZqWy9ag56CuQcXQct1MtGDFMbdKat9Q@HIDDEN> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: Octidi 8 Messidor an 232 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volu?= =?utf-8?Q?tion=2C?= jour de =?utf-8?Q?l'=C3=89chalotte?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:54:01 +0200 Message-ID: <87a5j9dqeu.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 71577 Cc: 71577 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi, Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@HIDDEN> skribis: > But I tried to have a new look at : > https://guix.gnu.org/en/download/latest/ > > But with another browser, another computer, reloading the page in firefox, > or even forced reloading (CTRL+F5) I'm still not seeing the x86_64 qcow2. There=E2=80=99s no x86_64 QCOW2 image, that=E2=80=99s why. :-) (The bug that was fixed is that the installation ISO and the Hurd QCOW2 are no longer 404.) I hope this clarifies the situation. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#71577; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at 71577) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jun 2024 18:32:20 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 24 14:32:20 2024 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35425 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1sLoUF-0001v3-Vw for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 14:32:20 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:50681) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <vincent.legoll@HIDDEN>) id 1sLoUD-0001uo-Pf for 71577 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 14:32:18 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-f169.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1f6a837e9a3so28444685ad.1 for <71577 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 11:32:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1719253871; x=1719858671; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=dc+4Gux+PFbRKBisWjJjiMHggw5GegP/kjBDGy2ctIY=; b=FQCKPgTCQ+EAgWdkJolB2+JyQ+VUFlAZWn1oCsLABAUgG+SaqoBrPPvOLtOsHJbtQx 28euuIwva1y9ArAAMOOV05xpP3mi5xPktDU9OOXHUUMlUp78AEg4Ig2crG1oLwYEieff M1RAjmB0K3hIxh/1R3CD5cvW/YDBihr7s9KJNjN0MNX+EO073Vhxsay/5eaZDZKj2nXQ IpPfZVW+Xb7X//qpUrxb+HN2t3EjfPY1rgTvrOZddBO769aFrWvyvwxzcIdt+puWa0rR 7h7jER4nuTXe6ajHdVfz64VmTYA+iEcxfo7oAdhu1B5G089zQNl8KxEoklRz+ApCpU0u tXKg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1719253871; x=1719858671; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=dc+4Gux+PFbRKBisWjJjiMHggw5GegP/kjBDGy2ctIY=; b=WdBMUEW5EivVFhzkvmR8IN6Rngo18FMuCX3I2TACvh0VzzM/TvwQccUhAlucHh6D/b H7IyXRixJjH5C+v7BkXYtBpUMzgeqwoXik4Svtlhy8IYCRQ4I+qQXKSAMriDTLUbyd4C rLLVEjZxmtGN+aUrm7JhIOi1knYszXQOERUL0rgkfnKZjSdmUhIiu0ySHAh4uJFF4jhU e68NF0HB0UmKZEd3Q42h7tsJJ/KuC3t9F3cqYThHYSokMa8+j/MGDc01Pf0MGm4FElDh uG+2lHGgCYbn0KfSkMXq048wsSf6NRbLE2+NNrOm/B5HLPgiJ69kMosvNB70VuZggpEe 2rTw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxAULBl3QqlBc6CnQ9aCsrOAmwURHhQi1bmiINd4UW2hU2w/Zjs 25IKJq/BzDU/o5RaIfith7RwcOFx1aEOCznXCXVA0B2A08Jeq2+40KAgP/aiYdeUguQz8kiYtbz 3zRdVyhScrIWY66oV2a2uSYou1v0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE55arbvksVjinU7M7I8A/GcXdWXcQhLgiBc2Pqq9boYqw1GMzpi36pMygMnSMDTPCuUqSBaafIMaB0VKj83RI= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:214:b0:2c4:aab1:e435 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2c861486196mr3375651a91.44.1719253870708; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 11:31:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <CAEwRq=q3XeJ8E-TYmsEyRb5phX7FuL0k205ah==X2_wuh7nfgw@HIDDEN> <87wmmek9nl.fsf@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <87wmmek9nl.fsf@HIDDEN> From: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 18:30:59 +0000 Message-ID: <CAEwRq=pM8v6b7ZT+xdmZqWy9ag56CuQcXQct1MtGDFMbdKat9Q@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#71577: Some Images jobset lack artifacts To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003e14b1061ba6fc99" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 71577 Cc: 71577 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --0000000000003e14b1061ba6fc99 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Ludo, On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 8:49=E2=80=AFAM Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@HIDDEN>= wrote: > Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@HIDDEN> skribis: > > > I wanted to try a fresh guix in a VM, but the "Download / Latest" > > page (1) does not have the: > > "QCOW2 virtual machine (VM) image" > > "GNU Guix 1.4.0 QEMU Image" > > that is available on the "Download / Standard" page (2) > > This is now fixed: > > https://guix.gnu.org/en/download/latest/ > > For the record, the problem was that we=E2=80=99d be removing GC roots to= o > early, which was fixed here: > > > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/maintenance.git/commit/?id=3D489fc= 437c7b3aa0af41a40d6090eb4c51ced0028 > Yes, I remember seeing some discussion about this. But I tried to have a new look at : https://guix.gnu.org/en/download/latest/ But with another browser, another computer, reloading the page in firefox, or even forced reloading (CTRL+F5) I'm still not seeing the x86_64 qcow2. Is there some propagation delay, or something on my side that is wrong ? > > BTW, DL latest page also lacks checksum files to verify integrity. > > Since this process is automated, there cannot be a signature to verify > the authenticity of those binaries (integrity is most likely verified > indirectly via embedded checksums in the container formats). > That's why I spoke about checksum and not signatures, I'm not talking about authenticity, but just about DL checking. I don't really know if qcow has integrated checksums, but I doubt raw image does. So I think this could still have some usefulness. Thanks --=20 Vincent Legoll --0000000000003e14b1061ba6fc99 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div>Hello Ludo,<br></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quo= te"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 8:49=E2= =80=AFAM Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <<a href=3D"mailto:ludo@HIDDEN">ludo@gnu.= org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"marg= in:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1e= x"> Vincent Legoll <<a href=3D"mailto:vincent.legoll@HIDDEN" target=3D"_b= lank">vincent.legoll@HIDDEN</a>> skribis:<br> <br> > I wanted to try a fresh guix in a VM, but the "Download / Latest&= quot;<br> > page (1) does not have the:<br> > "QCOW2 virtual machine (VM) image"<br> > "GNU Guix 1.4.0 QEMU Image"<br> > that is available on the "Download / Standard" page (2)<br> <br> This is now fixed:<br> <br> =C2=A0 <a href=3D"https://guix.gnu.org/en/download/latest/" rel=3D"noreferr= er" target=3D"_blank">https://guix.gnu.org/en/download/latest/</a><br> <br> For the record, the problem was that we=E2=80=99d be removing GC roots too<= br> early, which was fixed here:<br> <br> =C2=A0 <a href=3D"https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/maintenance.git/co= mmit/?id=3D489fc437c7b3aa0af41a40d6090eb4c51ced0028" rel=3D"noreferrer" tar= get=3D"_blank">https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/maintenance.git/commi= t/?id=3D489fc437c7b3aa0af41a40d6090eb4c51ced0028</a><br></blockquote><div><= br></div><div>Yes, I remember seeing some discussion about this.</div><div>= <br></div><div>But I tried to have a new look at :</div><div><a href=3D"htt= ps://guix.gnu.org/en/download/latest/" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank"= >https://guix.gnu.org/en/download/latest/</a></div><div><br></div><div>But = with another browser, another computer, reloading the page in firefox,</div= ><div>or even forced reloading (CTRL+F5) I'm still not seeing the x86_6= 4 qcow2.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Is there some propagation delay, or s= omething on my side that is wrong ?<br> </div><div>=C2=A0</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0p= x 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"> > BTW, DL latest page also lacks checksum files to verify integrity.<br> <br> Since this process is automated, there cannot be a signature to verify<br> the authenticity of those binaries (integrity is most likely verified<br> indirectly via embedded checksums in the container formats).<br></blockquot= e><div><br></div><div>That's why I spoke about checksum and not signatu= res, I'm not talking</div><div>about authenticity, but just about DL ch= ecking.</div><div><br></div><div>I don't really know if qcow has integr= ated checksums, but I doubt raw</div><div>image does. So I think this could= still=C2=A0 have some usefulness.<br></div></div><br clear=3D"all"></div><= div>Thanks</div><div><br></div><div><span class=3D"gmail_signature_prefix">= -- </span><br><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_signature">Vincent Legoll</di= v></div></div> --0000000000003e14b1061ba6fc99--
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#71577; Package guix.
Full text available.Ludovic Courtès <ludo@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
Full text available.Received: (at 71577) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jun 2024 08:51:55 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 24 04:51:55 2024 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46975 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1sLfQZ-0004eC-Eq for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 04:51:55 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52692) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1sLfQX-0004dr-IP for 71577 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 04:51:54 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1sLfOL-0007i4-HW; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 04:49:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=FXQ8MUxi2M3nZXJhW/KbvFHa9oT2SCSfaUTMmEpht1M=; b=QSwtPvjAROqh6LuyhGd2 5uAdos4eN02Zfkz4KYeHZ9cv0LUnSyq0osTS5NN7R6Cen63h3MEEvf7SY3siK4c72jvbTe4UtqgtD OMOteEN+LoS9/uIb1heFLJ2ZEk5zag095Xx3Sb3fOkemNcr6wdqJRAoYhhh1akeglgr6OlsUkG/W0 hmD3htF+pLLKLLaFT4kG2bk1MhvqAmxJhk1ua+7oqjQX3oi7q8gvb3qQGDK/j4Si8wGejDTO/Bfz7 UbE4y4np/GXiXXQQ7v4CAsyGB4OWtHpLE0eo8iJOArGjBET8ame9cKeHJdYt2mIwupISXrW3jxWMa TvuHF8fCOO/ymQ==; From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> To: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#71577: Some Images jobset lack artifacts In-Reply-To: <CAEwRq=q3XeJ8E-TYmsEyRb5phX7FuL0k205ah==X2_wuh7nfgw@HIDDEN> (Vincent Legoll's message of "Sat, 15 Jun 2024 19:43:17 +0000") References: <CAEwRq=q3XeJ8E-TYmsEyRb5phX7FuL0k205ah==X2_wuh7nfgw@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 10:49:34 +0200 Message-ID: <87wmmek9nl.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 71577 Cc: 71577 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi Vincent, Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@HIDDEN> skribis: > I wanted to try a fresh guix in a VM, but the "Download / Latest" > page (1) does not have the: > "QCOW2 virtual machine (VM) image" > "GNU Guix 1.4.0 QEMU Image" > that is available on the "Download / Standard" page (2) This is now fixed: https://guix.gnu.org/en/download/latest/ For the record, the problem was that we=E2=80=99d be removing GC roots too early, which was fixed here: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/maintenance.git/commit/?id=3D489fc= 437c7b3aa0af41a40d6090eb4c51ced0028 > BTW, DL latest page also lacks checksum files to verify integrity. Since this process is automated, there cannot be a signature to verify the authenticity of those binaries (integrity is most likely verified indirectly via embedded checksums in the container formats). > no downloadable artifacts: > novena-barebones-raw-image > disk-image > > Is that intended or an oversight ? I think it was intentional that we=E2=80=99d only provide the =E2=80=9Cmost= useful=E2=80=9D images for download. If you think others should be added, please let=E2=80= =99s discuss it on guix-devel. Thanks! Ludo=E2=80=99.
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#71577; Package guix.
Full text available.
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Jun 2024 19:59:58 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jun 15 15:59:58 2024
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45590 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1sIZZ8-0005XF-2m
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2024 15:59:58 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:54510)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <vincent.legoll@HIDDEN>) id 1sIZZ6-0005WR-2J
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2024 15:59:56 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <vincent.legoll@HIDDEN>)
id 1sIZJG-0001yz-08
for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Sat, 15 Jun 2024 15:43:34 -0400
Received: from mail-pj1-x1033.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::1033])
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <vincent.legoll@HIDDEN>)
id 1sIZJE-0006p6-Bj
for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Sat, 15 Jun 2024 15:43:33 -0400
Received: by mail-pj1-x1033.google.com with SMTP id
98e67ed59e1d1-2c2eb98a64fso2707110a91.2
for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Sat, 15 Jun 2024 12:43:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1718480610; x=1719085410; darn=gnu.org;
h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject
:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=xZEtzwdLOGuJX/fiF2YvF17OrxR61Oe/QMcdUvF2OjI=;
b=TWQv8Aqnh/tDYe47xrz2KPcKbU/TU+cGuGQ9xmMhU6K/YTuoqhGdM/17oiNqGVCJop
HZpISs/d7bsgoF2jsCEKlEkwytlfaV8MegqHeywQid6ycN06x1vgK2oVY0WexpPkaQF9
89BU3VViHwsdlZH57nI1F3FzN/gJBJRKsUpmlmC3GPmXiMU9vA45mZ+kpqycFs/Mhkyv
FMwWmkT+wz3OdYvNiInpgQHOHwjHb4IvHVRfPCKnvrGY7E0tbRd/SjOMGA9t3sZDlOyx
n2qk6lvZFKWY/U9xKSsuSvbzOurwLLDl36Nl9Y4zXmeoiRjkU7NrY7eNd3u2b6obsURU
/tWA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1718480610; x=1719085410;
h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state
:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=xZEtzwdLOGuJX/fiF2YvF17OrxR61Oe/QMcdUvF2OjI=;
b=kTFa2ubM1q1OK65ICdAKVp9C1ojEJUP/2xhnBGOEV0K2JOnKlLLj+PJs2jP+3dOrGf
CpyWqJVZhnzsH3H5/fOXMGELRu3TDdzXQXMtAGl4CEX4ABalDwud6sSBE4Ecwgjz+0Le
p1KSACbzvph8MR8l/gCBpwC+N9uqi74so/MOmw9S0ypQNlakrShXWMqjEj5L6UColyWr
ToAVtU6JituXO8pseqCOnTeNGdzP5OiZSg0ldVAYvta/dVUJy2MlHWFEjy8p/HVrvq3m
XY8d05Trl1L99D80rMXUGp8sB4JPZ51XHe12aTN01BBHzjRNn2kLAV61Z10cu7JFmiSf
yi4A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzlwuvAwQDN03NkUBH2roSEmKeY0PdCY6fVCXR1eXyIJQcDQwL7
UkpMAAPtEmQQ+yIsOvCo9HndPsWzQRnEqoigr19i+Xd134Ff5f3WhwDgHiQw1tAADyaoHg8mraZ
RBlPfz+s9hmhvMu2qbporMax91uTT+xUM
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEf4QQ/hfqowoe08fz3sT1tFuZAqmtVCkCoj7SfP4wR4nVg3DWpvX3J2NneqJSVazatzFA77+6eZ7RyqWZJLSs=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4d8b:b0:2c4:aa67:895c with SMTP id
98e67ed59e1d1-2c4db242648mr5728091a91.17.1718480609833; Sat, 15 Jun 2024
12:43:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@HIDDEN>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 19:43:17 +0000
Message-ID: <CAEwRq=q3XeJ8E-TYmsEyRb5phX7FuL0k205ah==X2_wuh7nfgw@HIDDEN>
Subject: Some Images jobset lack artifacts
To: Bug Guix <bug-guix@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::1033;
envelope-from=vincent.legoll@HIDDEN; helo=mail-pj1-x1033.google.com
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
Hello,
I wanted to try a fresh guix in a VM, but the "Download / Latest"
page (1) does not have the:
"QCOW2 virtual machine (VM) image"
"GNU Guix 1.4.0 QEMU Image"
that is available on the "Download / Standard" page (2)
BTW, DL latest page also lacks checksum files to verify integrity.
So I looked at the CI, in the images jobset page (3), and strangely,
some jobs have "Build outputs" download links (but no checksum either),
whereas some other only have "Outputs" which is a store file path:
have downloadable artifacts:
hurd-barebones.qcow2
iso9660-image
pine64-barebones-raw-image
pinebook-pro-barebones-raw-image
no downloadable artifacts:
novena-barebones-raw-image
disk-image
Is that intended or an oversight ?
I think if this is fixed (missing artifacts and checksums), that page
could replace the "Download / Latest" one and the menu link could
directly link here.
WDYT ?
(1) - https://guix.gnu.org/en/download/latest
(2) - https://guix.gnu.org/en/download
(3) - https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/images
--
Vincent Legoll
Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@HIDDEN>:bug-guix@HIDDEN.
Full text available.bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#71577; Package guix.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.