GNU bug report logs - #71625
build of /gnu/store/5mzanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-guix-package-cache.drv failed

Previous Next

To reply to this bug, email your comments to 71625 AT debbugs.gnu.org.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: danclm <at> tutanota.com
To: Bug Guix <bug-guix <at> gnu.org>
Subject: build of
 /gnu/store/5mzanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-guix-package-cache.drv failed
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 23:41:34 +0200 (CEST)

Hi Guix, 
I'm getting this bug when attempting to guix pull (it persists with an older generation):

build of /gnu/store/5mzanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-guix-package-cache.drv failed
hint: This usually indicates a bug in one of the channels you are pulling from, or some incompatibility among them.  You can check the build log
and report the issue to the channel developers.

The channels you are pulling from are: guix.

View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/5m/zanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-guix-package-cache.drv.gz'.
cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/r7v8j9pgaw3sc3wjmchd99arjp527w73-profile.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
guix pull: error: build of `/gnu/store/r7v8j9pgaw3sc3wjmchd99arjp527w73-profile.drv' failed
(repl-version 0 1 1)
Generating package cache for '/gnu/store/gxhl3fny25a9d1rmpl9fr9h8brd1ng4m-profile'...

Backtrace:
In gnu/packages.scm:
   439:11 19 (generate-package-cache _)
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
   460:18 18 (fold #<procedure expand-cache expr> _ _)
In gnu/packages.scm:
   399:37 17 (expand-cache . _)
In guix/packages.scm:
  1411:17 16 (supported-package? #<package acpi-call-linux-module <at> 1?> ?)
In guix/memoization.scm:
    101:0 15 (_ #<hash-table 7fffe4f30ea0 1780/3517> #<package acpi?> ?)
In guix/packages.scm:
  1381:14 14 (_)
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
   460:18 13 (fold #<procedure 7ffff4aa6de0 at guix/packages.scm:13?> ?)
In guix/packages.scm:
  1385:44 12 (_ _ ("x86_64-linux" "i686-linux"))
In guix/memoization.scm:
    101:0 11 (_ #<hash-table 7fffe4f30ea0 1780/3517> #<package dwar?> ?)
In guix/packages.scm:
  1381:14 10 (_)
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
   460:18  9 (fold #<procedure 7ffff4aa7d20 at guix/packages.scm:13?> ?)
In guix/packages.scm:
  1385:44  8 (_ _ ("x86_64-linux" "i686-linux"))
In guix/memoization.scm:
    101:0  7 (_ #<hash-table 7fffe4f30ea0 1780/3517> #<package libb?> ?)
In guix/packages.scm:
  1389:39  6 (_)
  1651:16  5 (package->bag _ _ _ #:graft? _)
  1755:47  4 (thunk)
In gnu/packages/linux.scm:
  9981:25  3 (native-inputs #<package libbpf <at> 1.4.1 gnu/packages/linu?>)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
  1685:16  2 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
  1780:13  1 (_ #<&compound-exception components: (#<&undefined-vari?>)
In unknown file:
           0 (backtrace #<undefined>)

(exception unbound-variable (value #f) (value "Unbound variable: ~S") (value (linux-libre-headers-6.8)) (value #f))
Thank you,
Best regards

-- 

Message #8 received at 71625 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: danclm <at> tutanota.com
Cc: 71625 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#71625: build of
 /gnu/store/5mzanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-guix-package-cache.drv failed
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 15:26:24 +0200

Hi,

Sorry for the late reply.

On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 at 23:41, danclm <at> tutanota.com wrote:

> (exception unbound-variable (value #f) (value "Unbound variable: ~S") (value (linux-libre-headers-6.8)) (value #f))

It means you have one channel that does not define this
’linux-libre-headers-6.8’ symbol (one package I guess).

Well, if you are still able to reproduce the bug, could you provide the
information:

 1. Do you have only the main Guix channel?  Or do you have extra
    channels?

 2. Could you provide the revision you are targetting?


Cheers,
simon

Message #11 received at 71625 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: danclm <at> tutanota.com
To: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 71625 <71625 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#71625: build of
 /gnu/store/5mzanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-guix-package-cache.drv failed
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 20:40:06 +0200 (CEST)

Hi Simon, 
do not worry and thanks for your reply.

I can't reproduce the bug now as I changed my config/repo and deleted the older generations. I also don't remember how I fixed the issue. I use only the main Guix channel, no extra channels.
--
Sep 10, 2024, 18:17 by zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com:

> Hi,
>
> Sorry for the late reply.
>
> On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 at 23:41, danclm <at> tutanota.com wrote:
>
>> (exception unbound-variable (value #f) (value "Unbound variable: ~S") (value (linux-libre-headers-6.8)) (value #f))
>>
>
> It means you have one channel that does not define this
> ’linux-libre-headers-6.8’ symbol (one package I guess).
>
> Well, if you are still able to reproduce the bug, could you provide the
> information:
>
> 1. Do you have only the main Guix channel?  Or do you have extra
> channels?
>
> 2. Could you provide the revision you are targetting?
>
>
> Cheers,
> simon
>

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.