GNU bug report logs -
#71625
build of /gnu/store/5mzanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-guix-package-cache.drv failed
Previous Next
To reply to this bug, email your comments to 71625 AT debbugs.gnu.org.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#71625
; Package
guix
.
(Tue, 18 Jun 2024 07:56:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
danclm <at> tutanota.com
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Tue, 18 Jun 2024 07:56:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Guix,
I'm getting this bug when attempting to guix pull (it persists with an older generation):
build of /gnu/store/5mzanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-guix-package-cache.drv failed
hint: This usually indicates a bug in one of the channels you are pulling from, or some incompatibility among them. You can check the build log
and report the issue to the channel developers.
The channels you are pulling from are: guix.
View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/5m/zanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-guix-package-cache.drv.gz'.
cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/r7v8j9pgaw3sc3wjmchd99arjp527w73-profile.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
guix pull: error: build of `/gnu/store/r7v8j9pgaw3sc3wjmchd99arjp527w73-profile.drv' failed
(repl-version 0 1 1)
Generating package cache for '/gnu/store/gxhl3fny25a9d1rmpl9fr9h8brd1ng4m-profile'...
Backtrace:
In gnu/packages.scm:
439:11 19 (generate-package-cache _)
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
460:18 18 (fold #<procedure expand-cache expr> _ _)
In gnu/packages.scm:
399:37 17 (expand-cache . _)
In guix/packages.scm:
1411:17 16 (supported-package? #<package acpi-call-linux-module <at> 1?> ?)
In guix/memoization.scm:
101:0 15 (_ #<hash-table 7fffe4f30ea0 1780/3517> #<package acpi?> ?)
In guix/packages.scm:
1381:14 14 (_)
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
460:18 13 (fold #<procedure 7ffff4aa6de0 at guix/packages.scm:13?> ?)
In guix/packages.scm:
1385:44 12 (_ _ ("x86_64-linux" "i686-linux"))
In guix/memoization.scm:
101:0 11 (_ #<hash-table 7fffe4f30ea0 1780/3517> #<package dwar?> ?)
In guix/packages.scm:
1381:14 10 (_)
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
460:18 9 (fold #<procedure 7ffff4aa7d20 at guix/packages.scm:13?> ?)
In guix/packages.scm:
1385:44 8 (_ _ ("x86_64-linux" "i686-linux"))
In guix/memoization.scm:
101:0 7 (_ #<hash-table 7fffe4f30ea0 1780/3517> #<package libb?> ?)
In guix/packages.scm:
1389:39 6 (_)
1651:16 5 (package->bag _ _ _ #:graft? _)
1755:47 4 (thunk)
In gnu/packages/linux.scm:
9981:25 3 (native-inputs #<package libbpf <at> 1.4.1 gnu/packages/linu?>)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
1685:16 2 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
1780:13 1 (_ #<&compound-exception components: (#<&undefined-vari?>)
In unknown file:
0 (backtrace #<undefined>)
(exception unbound-variable (value #f) (value "Unbound variable: ~S") (value (linux-libre-headers-6.8)) (value #f))
Thank you,
Best regards
--
This bug report was last modified 81 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.