GNU bug report logs - #71870
Some broken Go packages (including Podman)

Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.

Package: guix; Reported by: Nils Landt <nils@HIDDEN>; dated Mon, 1 Jul 2024 07:36:02 UTC; Maintainer for guix is bug-guix@HIDDEN.

Message received at 71870 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 71870) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jul 2024 10:03:16 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jul 02 06:03:16 2024
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35964 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1sOaM0-0006U4-A8
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 06:03:16 -0400
Received: from mail-40136.proton.ch ([185.70.40.136]:44681)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <woshilapin@HIDDEN>) id 1sOaLx-0006Tm-6b
 for 71870 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 06:03:15 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuziwo.info;
 s=protonmail; t=1719914585; x=1720173785;
 bh=pkNKI5vkpooHObBOPXm5DnMxyBsQjYN3pFJ/WHcLFRA=;
 h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:
 Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID:BIMI-Selector;
 b=lXengzGZSVYE3FNXtISMbqXJrKFntUCei3NvpzpjkgrPv7WRjdZ7u4jKxO5+9O4A7
 UCGhiUg9w4xiUiMyXJF8nQsjDOYQd0Qt/zkIoLYBtuKD0A0gGAe9eTEhiaymKy56XP
 CTottdcr67i4rp788d453Cv+bv5xuQmiELr35m8ukRH0lWYgf2snWAwq/iClByXDxi
 CPoLc6wC2t/sg1M3YDMI7ctv7aPjorYN3KYadNqCBehdl23l8r1ocmyVW9MUexgTxg
 ksQbfdwMtOLRx1Ff1Ly2B1GPX+DxsKeXJdxBpIbw/AF18g41AAoP09SAZP9yKo7xY6
 o2V2T01/6wsyg==
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2024 10:03:00 +0000
To: "71870 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <71870 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
From: woshilapin <woshilapin@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: Some broken Go packages (including Podman)
Message-ID: <0ywYMXpaeVXncJ4ceEEQU0GJ9EcrgQytIK2atgICiAkTnNn6ZN8TU9HqsD4T3doVZUJUmO_rSAUBwgWbDdfxLBoy-o1-P8t1T4yIFEmPE3w=@tuziwo.info>
Feedback-ID: 30348956:user:proton
X-Pm-Message-ID: 6598ed8b6e5c92d699fd28f03199172ccf0ff12b
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 71870
Cc: "nils@HIDDEN" <nils@HIDDEN>,
 "jgart@HIDDEN" <jgart@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Hi Nils, hi jgart,

> Building the new Podman package fails because building a depdency
> (gvisor-tap-vsock) fails:
> <...>
> It looks to me like 0df957eecc536e1d0a5722b47dda1563439bbe04 removed
> remove-go-references, but it is still used by podman,
> gvisor-tap-vsock, and buildah.

You might be interested in this other issue that links to some
interesting content related to the removal of `remove-go-references`,
especially the following comment.

https://issues.guix.gnu.org/71852#1

Sincerely,
--
Jean SIMARD aka woshilapin





Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#71870; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 71870 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 71870) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jul 2024 06:20:58 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jul 02 02:20:58 2024
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35620 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1sOWsr-00066W-Jz
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 02:20:57 -0400
Received: from mout-p-201.mailbox.org ([80.241.56.171]:38492)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <nils@HIDDEN>) id 1sOWsm-00066D-4D
 for 71870 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 02:20:56 -0400
Received: from smtp102.mailbox.org (smtp102.mailbox.org
 [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:b231:465::102])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mout-p-201.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WCt7v1Sc6z9sWS;
 Tue,  2 Jul 2024 08:20:43 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=landt.email; s=MBO0001;
 t=1719901243;
 h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
 to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
 bh=PeBuQtU23ESAvjLnKE/cUjG4CCOefM94AqHhRUvObcM=;
 b=t2w/NZHhoO4yaAh0ZQ7zhPCHyvepk8oac1/Ln0Rtcf6By9Sqss2+D63MCL/B4SPnJ2205A
 brTfRvXyTyybS5FrBJTva7dbdzDo6GzgwjaLiZhsaxrq/E842j1u7PniiyWSDqrGSLuIV9
 zqN5z/kt0qmBRd4/a/LPs4+B1s21GEHqT+mGFEJKSLkg4d1F0AlutDdW/spg8wKaW85NAg
 pBGOFoFgsJrVWextahm0M2PJxmLvxs8ugT0tNUMMreWDvbTGNdPB7dlpjF/2E11EJSZ9yn
 j1ZDK50ILudlY05Eu1r4y3whk4lUoQBzSnrEounjxZ13+39C+7jMVJNq8O9ZxA==
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 08:20:42 +0200 (CEST)
From: Nils Landt <nils@HIDDEN>
To: jgart <jgart@HIDDEN>, 71870 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Message-ID: <479449617.175721.1719901242517@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <35d9a037be458b7f3e9b88ddbf9c7b877bfe9028@HIDDEN>
References: <602050338.91939.1719819308299@HIDDEN>
 <871q4dw56z.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <1191618923.144212.1719845034655@HIDDEN>
 <35d9a037be458b7f3e9b88ddbf9c7b877bfe9028@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: Some broken Go packages (including Podman)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4WCt7v1Sc6z9sWS
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 71870
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)

> jgart <jgart@HIDDEN> hat am 01.07.2024 19:04 CEST geschrieben:
> 
>  
> > No, the patch submission process is too annoying for me.
> >
> 
> Hi Nils,
> 
> Sorry to hear that. I can relate to that as I've also been annoyed by aspects of the process.
> 
> Can you share some of the pain points that you've experienced with the patch submission process?
> 
> This will help us potentially address that and open discussion around it.
>
> How do you think that the patch submission process can be improved?
 
Nothing that hasn't been talked about for years, really.

- Patch submission workflow without email
- Code review tool with threaded at-code conversations
- Code formatter that I can make work for vim (i.e. guix style for non-packages)
- Useful commit messages instead of GNU ChangeLog

My previous attempt at contribution (https://issues.guix.gnu.org/66557) was quite unpleasant.
I don't know how to phrase my critique of the reviewers in a constructive manner, given that I respect we're all human beings volunteering time for this hobby.
 
> I'm going to give a talk in August at the Guix London meetup on patch review, the mumi CLI tool, and my current personal workflow.

I will be watching the recording, but I don't see how it would address my wishlist :)




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#71870; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 71870 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 71870) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jul 2024 17:04:20 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jul 01 13:04:20 2024
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34322 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1sOKRw-0004nh-2q
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2024 13:04:20 -0400
Received: from mx2.dismail.de ([159.69.191.136]:13191)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <jgart@HIDDEN>) id 1sOKRt-0004nM-Rz
 for 71870 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2024 13:04:18 -0400
Received: from mx2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mx2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id eaf32340;
 Mon, 1 Jul 2024 19:04:09 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h=
 mime-version:date:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from
 :message-id:subject:to:in-reply-to:references; s=20190914; bh=/C
 Bi4OuKuLtK/ZV+e88Y9ObzSdJj+ZfweaEzWboJyXw=; b=QWtXZTlmTMzyVS0UsZ
 yXwIqsyvzS4/MsdZ0vx+KATbyYrWloM3lA874j645SOQeMluX3gTJsTlxLrtC3Cc
 4302CGdFOlq+9HWp9SLb5t/eU47HofLSEfzE4TRxFQtMgkBR3dmYWcBdtDM3oz/r
 xkBr0v2IjWdd8Xj8iRfnqc/89QaZgj9gl6KTgun3ItmR6E7ovqkeWPDw/egX/Vrc
 GvZhK5Sqb2lUCKuTBLPInmD7TTurvxd6S9WOxLmGOs+laoodAQyqdxj42mI5bLjF
 F8gAYRJGwcPSCJXKPgQtNF1yobB5JPFkt1aPxBkU96PzVorgDgG8tm5+0d/iRLPm
 NvDw==
Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (<unknown> [10.240.26.12])
 by mx2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id b197a611;
 Mon, 1 Jul 2024 19:04:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id b41e5e0f;
 Mon, 1 Jul 2024 19:04:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 7045abec
 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); 
 Mon, 1 Jul 2024 19:04:08 +0200 (CEST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2024 17:04:08 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: "jgart" <jgart@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <35d9a037be458b7f3e9b88ddbf9c7b877bfe9028@HIDDEN>
TLS-Required: No
Subject: Re: Some broken Go packages (including Podman)
To: "Nils Landt" <nils@HIDDEN>, 71870 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <1191618923.144212.1719845034655@HIDDEN>
References: <602050338.91939.1719819308299@HIDDEN>
 <871q4dw56z.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <1191618923.144212.1719845034655@HIDDEN>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 71870
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

> No, the patch submission process is too annoying for me.
>

Hi Nils,

Sorry to hear that. I can relate to that as I've also been annoyed by asp=
ects of the process.

Can you share some of the pain points that you've experienced with the pa=
tch submission process?

This will help us potentially address that and open discussion around it.

How do you think that the patch submission process can be improved?

I'm going to give a talk in August at the Guix London meetup on patch rev=
iew, the mumi CLI tool, and my current personal workflow.

TBA,

jgart




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#71870; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 71870 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 71870) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jul 2024 14:44:09 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jul 01 10:44:09 2024
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33491 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1sOIGG-0006GK-R7
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2024 10:44:09 -0400
Received: from mout-p-103.mailbox.org ([80.241.56.161]:40778)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <nils@HIDDEN>) id 1sOIGC-0006Ff-Ib
 for 71870 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2024 10:44:07 -0400
Received: from smtp102.mailbox.org (smtp102.mailbox.org [10.196.197.102])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mout-p-103.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WCTLz1PqCz9sQ6;
 Mon,  1 Jul 2024 16:43:55 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=landt.email; s=MBO0001;
 t=1719845035;
 h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
 to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
 bh=7KDxtz30SWBz40x8YTEGQftbnD1N6RCtuX4jFLYio28=;
 b=IC6HHrjJxl4BdssVT1t6q/AWsOlAU4Yu09Nak3Rf3y12LJ69qqom953/7U5i/80SoSI61h
 FnnZNS55cnD7656hqxVUBjMgHV4bH8mQ6B1qVg2tO/SL+z1iiAsIU5ndtnP7SCFDVnqszA
 mCL8Y+Fvbs6uSBZEg30M/nOJJOzhbdHmsyzShojmlt0VYvhBRN9NA4+a4qbFLjjcOxLHxz
 7SauLWmYCJ1KTk25GYmFZmC15iCT95E6MDP8+/h1Hjjf7H9rnTPG+Cs8V4bAqu7p5J/94B
 QzbCAyXHSRdOH7Ll2ZLqARyMMw5KCIDe4zVVLrVMEgaX6uo1OEIpZZfLy/TxIQ==
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 16:43:54 +0200 (CEST)
From: Nils Landt <nils@HIDDEN>
To: jgart <jgart@HIDDEN>, 71870 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Message-ID: <1191618923.144212.1719845034655@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <871q4dw56z.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <602050338.91939.1719819308299@HIDDEN>
 <871q4dw56z.fsf@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: Some broken Go packages (including Podman)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 71870
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)

> jgart <jgart@HIDDEN> hat am 01.07.2024 16:35 CEST geschrieben:
> 
>  
> > Building the new Podman package fails because building a depdency
> > (gvisor-tap-vsock) fails:
> 
> Hi Nils,
> 
> Would you be interested in sending patches to fix these failures?

No, the patch submission process is too annoying for me.




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#71870; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 71870 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 71870) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jul 2024 14:35:54 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jul 01 10:35:53 2024
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33473 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1sOI8H-00062h-LP
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2024 10:35:53 -0400
Received: from mx1.dismail.de ([78.46.223.134]:2753)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <jgart@HIDDEN>) id 1sOI8E-00062Q-FM
 for 71870 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2024 10:35:52 -0400
Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 93da03fd;
 Mon, 1 Jul 2024 16:35:43 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h=from:to:cc
 :subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;
 s=20190914; bh=JtPSM4HBKfcsVkvaQOXnDC8ABJknKLcOEbGC8IN/pks=; b=
 YXCuf2f1lFYr5dliWGKlbYKWfpCqhNXydZp3oxNb1rPwZgM6GbSruwiyLNPpo2kr
 wX7hzKLSOycMS15ovKdp3uEEIWkYytWfV62Y0KaGYMcipy0j9zwDczMyUIT3citU
 qxfabaX5WKND8FF1e6Bi3Znw6uYqm55x2IYLvVz7QIk+b+6yUAQrsHjF1MxGMtTj
 PvJd9cgFMIeW4bUJhQkc0mtpqscHR21UMX5gJ5WaRilDUmH/TLvKoBOupGuPYYXj
 JqnkfXEV+zm05qa6R5kf44ldk70PLFWiIrKC20ZmtbtKGWfNXyZiT6z68RozlcXB
 R6XStd9DgcI6uTkmKtUVgw==
Received: from smtp1.dismail.de (<unknown> [10.240.26.11])
 by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 68e98b73;
 Mon, 1 Jul 2024 16:35:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 63adc0a5;
 Mon, 1 Jul 2024 16:35:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 47211f76
 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); 
 Mon, 1 Jul 2024 16:35:42 +0200 (CEST)
From: jgart <jgart@HIDDEN>
To: 71870 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Some broken Go packages (including Podman)
In-Reply-To: <602050338.91939.1719819308299@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2024 09:35:32 -0500
Message-ID: <871q4dw56z.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 71870
Cc: Nils Landt <nils@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)


> Building the new Podman package fails because building a depdency
> (gvisor-tap-vsock) fails:

Hi Nils,

Would you be interested in sending patches to fix these failures?
-- 
all the best,
jgart




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#71870; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jul 2024 07:35:27 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jul 01 03:35:27 2024
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60011 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1sOBZP-0008MK-3g
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2024 03:35:27 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:33340)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <nils@HIDDEN>) id 1sOBZM-0008MA-OC
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2024 03:35:25 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <nils@HIDDEN>) id 1sOBZL-000463-M8
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Mon, 01 Jul 2024 03:35:24 -0400
Received: from mout-p-201.mailbox.org ([2001:67c:2050:0:465::201])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <nils@HIDDEN>) id 1sOBZJ-0000oX-Nl
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Mon, 01 Jul 2024 03:35:23 -0400
Received: from smtp102.mailbox.org (smtp102.mailbox.org [10.196.197.102])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mout-p-201.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WCHrD544yz9sjD
 for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Mon,  1 Jul 2024 09:35:08 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=landt.email; s=MBO0001;
 t=1719819308;
 h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
 to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type;
 bh=WDLCXl386JVffJOXqyJwqkXoAOHgIg/kiKqrDoLtQhc=;
 b=rpMdaaZd9g+9jDYkF8EVeHhFz9fzbZKXWY60MipMplZn7KB1gYMHWCERVbWHM/mKmifNha
 rsNozwYJb2fokBfoB5GAj313HDk3pnMOt9AivVHUv0Lm7749SPMIFHUo8wRS2AmSM29qiN
 Mws/cgakOEd7GjGrW7z5PaNrtSrnYaMoKXnzjugwzxuIdw9AkmwZxMYdxi7gkW0QK52exo
 2fwzrpM8ERVuQ168QE7Gpitxaz2Nw7z2+D8zA3pd6hSKj665ZJuCPVrKhwn3Z80G1xqPid
 n9QJK+DeUB+ZQRCFNx+5OMb3PVIcJug42lqLjk1/Prlcdve7GWK0aLJSgefLmw==
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 09:35:08 +0200 (CEST)
From: Nils Landt <nils@HIDDEN>
To: "bug-guix@HIDDEN" <bug-guix@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <602050338.91939.1719819308299@HIDDEN>
Subject: Some broken Go packages (including Podman)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
 boundary="----=_Part_91938_266859965.1719819308297"
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:67c:2050:0:465::201;
 envelope-from=nils@HIDDEN; helo=mout-p-201.mailbox.org
X-Spam_score_int: -27
X-Spam_score: -2.8
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)

------=_Part_91938_266859965.1719819308297
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Building the new Podman package fails because building a depdency (gvisor-tap-vsock) fails:
 
The following derivation will be built:
/gnu/store/4lzcddslib984s8mlf854ig2lpgmnv3k-gvisor-tap-vsock-0.7.3.drv
building /gnu/store/4lzcddslib984s8mlf854ig2lpgmnv3k-gvisor-tap-vsock-0.7.3.drv...
WARNING: (guile-user): imported module (guix build utils) overrides core binding `delete'
Backtrace:
16 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/2a9k7v2qhydivh63xv921gr6kp9?")
In ice-9/eval.scm:
214:21 15 (_ #f)
217:50 14 (lp (#<procedure 7ffff77ff680 at ice-9/eval.scm:282:?> ?))
217:50 13 (lp (#<procedure 7ffff77ff660 at ice-9/eval.scm:282:?> ?))
217:50 12 (lp (#<procedure 7ffff77ff640 at ice-9/eval.scm:282:?> ?))
217:50 11 (lp (#<procedure 7ffff77ff620 at ice-9/eval.scm:282:?> ?))
217:50 10 (lp (#<procedure 7ffff77ff5c0 at ice-9/eval.scm:649:?> ?))
217:50 9 (lp (#<procedure 7ffff77ff580 at ice-9/eval.scm:282:?> ?))
217:50 8 (lp (#<procedure 7ffff77ff520 at ice-9/eval.scm:649:?> ?))
217:50 7 (lp (#<procedure 7ffff77ff500 at ice-9/eval.scm:282:?> ?))
217:50 6 (lp (#<procedure 7ffff77ff4c0 at ice-9/eval.scm:282:?> ?))
217:50 5 (lp (#<procedure 7ffff77ff4a0 at ice-9/eval.scm:282:?> ?))
217:33 4 (lp (#<procedure 7ffff77ff0a0 at ice-9/eval.scm:649:?> ?))
293:34 3 (_ #(#(#(#(#(#<directory (guile-user) 7f?> ?) ?) ?) ?) ?))
173:55 2 (_ #(#(#(#(#(#<directory (guile-user) 7f?> ?) ?) ?) ?) ?))
223:20 1 (proc #(#(#(#(#(#<directory (guile-user)?> ?) ?) ?) ?) ?))
In unknown file:
0 (%resolve-variable (5 (guix build go-build-system) . #) #)
ERROR: In procedure %resolve-variable:
In procedure module-lookup: Unbound variable: remove-go-references
builder for `/gnu/store/4lzcddslib984s8mlf854ig2lpgmnv3k-gvisor-tap-vsock-0.7.3.drv' failed with exit code 1
build of /gnu/store/4lzcddslib984s8mlf854ig2lpgmnv3k-gvisor-tap-vsock-0.7.3.drv failed
View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/4l/zcddslib984s8mlf854ig2lpgmnv3k-gvisor-tap-vsock-0.7.3.drv.gz'.
guix build: error: build of `/gnu/store/4lzcddslib984s8mlf854ig2lpgmnv3k-gvisor-tap-vsock-0.7.3.drv' failed
error: Recipe `guix` failed on line 13 with exit code 1
 
It looks to me like 0df957eecc536e1d0a5722b47dda1563439bbe04 removed remove-go-references, but it is still used by podman, gvisor-tap-vsock, and buildah.
 
--
Nils Landt
------=_Part_91938_266859965.1719819308297
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!doctype html>
<html>
 <head> 
  <meta charset="UTF-8"> 
 </head>
 <body>
  <div class="default-style">
   Building the new Podman package fails because building a depdency (gvisor-tap-vsock) fails:
  </div> 
  <div class="default-style">
   &nbsp;
  </div> 
  <div class="default-style"> 
   <div class="default-style">
    The following derivation will be built:
    <br>/gnu/store/4lzcddslib984s8mlf854ig2lpgmnv3k-gvisor-tap-vsock-0.7.3.drv
    <br>building /gnu/store/4lzcddslib984s8mlf854ig2lpgmnv3k-gvisor-tap-vsock-0.7.3.drv...
    <br>WARNING: (guile-user): imported module (guix build utils) overrides core binding `delete'
    <br>Backtrace:
    <br>16 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/2a9k7v2qhydivh63xv921gr6kp9?")
    <br>In ice-9/eval.scm:
    <br>214:21 15 (_ #f)
    <br>217:50 14 (lp (#&lt;procedure 7ffff77ff680 at ice-9/eval.scm:282:?&gt; ?))
    <br>217:50 13 (lp (#&lt;procedure 7ffff77ff660 at ice-9/eval.scm:282:?&gt; ?))
    <br>217:50 12 (lp (#&lt;procedure 7ffff77ff640 at ice-9/eval.scm:282:?&gt; ?))
    <br>217:50 11 (lp (#&lt;procedure 7ffff77ff620 at ice-9/eval.scm:282:?&gt; ?))
    <br>217:50 10 (lp (#&lt;procedure 7ffff77ff5c0 at ice-9/eval.scm:649:?&gt; ?))
    <br>217:50 9 (lp (#&lt;procedure 7ffff77ff580 at ice-9/eval.scm:282:?&gt; ?))
    <br>217:50 8 (lp (#&lt;procedure 7ffff77ff520 at ice-9/eval.scm:649:?&gt; ?))
    <br>217:50 7 (lp (#&lt;procedure 7ffff77ff500 at ice-9/eval.scm:282:?&gt; ?))
    <br>217:50 6 (lp (#&lt;procedure 7ffff77ff4c0 at ice-9/eval.scm:282:?&gt; ?))
    <br>217:50 5 (lp (#&lt;procedure 7ffff77ff4a0 at ice-9/eval.scm:282:?&gt; ?))
    <br>217:33 4 (lp (#&lt;procedure 7ffff77ff0a0 at ice-9/eval.scm:649:?&gt; ?))
    <br>293:34 3 (_ #(#(#(#(#(#&lt;directory (guile-user) 7f?&gt; ?) ?) ?) ?) ?))
    <br>173:55 2 (_ #(#(#(#(#(#&lt;directory (guile-user) 7f?&gt; ?) ?) ?) ?) ?))
    <br>223:20 1 (proc #(#(#(#(#(#&lt;directory (guile-user)?&gt; ?) ?) ?) ?) ?))
    <br>In unknown file:
    <br>0 (%resolve-variable (5 (guix build go-build-system) . #) #)
   </div> 
   <div class="default-style">
    ERROR: In procedure %resolve-variable:
    <br>In procedure module-lookup: Unbound variable: remove-go-references
    <br>builder for `/gnu/store/4lzcddslib984s8mlf854ig2lpgmnv3k-gvisor-tap-vsock-0.7.3.drv' failed with exit code 1
    <br>build of /gnu/store/4lzcddslib984s8mlf854ig2lpgmnv3k-gvisor-tap-vsock-0.7.3.drv failed
    <br>View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/4l/zcddslib984s8mlf854ig2lpgmnv3k-gvisor-tap-vsock-0.7.3.drv.gz'.
    <br>guix build: error: build of `/gnu/store/4lzcddslib984s8mlf854ig2lpgmnv3k-gvisor-tap-vsock-0.7.3.drv' failed
    <br>error: Recipe `guix` failed on line 13 with exit code 1
   </div> 
   <div class="default-style">
    &nbsp;
   </div> 
   <div class="default-style">
    It looks to me like 0df957eecc536e1d0a5722b47dda1563439bbe04 removed remove-go-references, but it is still used by podman, gvisor-tap-vsock, and buildah.
   </div> 
  </div> 
  <div class="default-style">
   &nbsp;
  </div> 
  <div class="io-ox-signature"> 
   <div class="default-style">
    --
   </div> 
   <div class="default-style">
    Nils Landt
   </div> 
  </div>
 </body>
</html>
------=_Part_91938_266859965.1719819308297--




Acknowledgement sent to Nils Landt <nils@HIDDEN>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN. Full text available.
Report forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#71870; Package guix. Full text available.
Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.
Last modified: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 10:15:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.