GNU bug report logs -
#71902
tex-site.el is not included in auctex 13.3
Previous Next
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 71902 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 71902 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-auctex <at> gnu.org
:
bug#71902
; Package
auctex
.
(Tue, 02 Jul 2024 14:26:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
WANG Yizhen <wangyz <at> iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-auctex <at> gnu.org
.
(Tue, 02 Jul 2024 14:26:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Dear maintainers of auctex,
The current commit of auctex seemed to have packed tex-site.el.in
instead of tex-site.el, which makes auctex unusable. I look forward to a
quick fix.
Best regards,
Yizhen
Information forwarded
to
bug-auctex <at> gnu.org
:
bug#71902
; Package
auctex
.
(Tue, 02 Jul 2024 14:53:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 71902 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
WANG Yizhen <wangyz <at> iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp> writes:
> The current commit of auctex seemed to have packed tex-site.el.in
> instead of tex-site.el, which makes auctex unusable. I look forward to
> a quick fix.
I presume you've downloaded the 13.3 tarball, right? You still have to
install the package once you unpack it. This is from the INSTALL file
distributed in the tarball:
The remainder of this section is about installing AUCTeX from a
release tarball or from a checkout of the AUCTeX repository.
Installing AUCTeX should be simple: merely ‘./configure’, ‘make’, and
‘make install’ for a standard site-wide installation (most other
installations can be done by specifying a ‘--prefix=...’ option).
OTOH, we recommend to install AUCTeX from ELPA where possible. Again,
from the README:
The modern and strongly recommended way of installing AUCTeX is by using
the Emacs package manager integrated in Emacs 24 and greater (ELPA).
Simply do ‘M-x list-packages <RET>’, mark the auctex package for
installation with ‘i’, and hit ‘x’ to execute the installation
procedure. That's all.
I don't see a bug here.
Best, Arash
Information forwarded
to
bug-auctex <at> gnu.org
:
bug#71902
; Package
auctex
.
(Wed, 03 Jul 2024 05:56:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 71902 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi WANG,
>>>>> WANG Yizhen <wangyz <at> iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp> writes:
> Dear maintainers of auctex,
> The current commit of auctex seemed to have packed tex-site.el.in
> instead of tex-site.el, which makes auctex unusable. I look forward to
> a quick fix.
This isn't a bug; tex-site.el is generated from tex-site.el.in under
standard installation process, namely configure&make. Follow the
instruction included in the distribution or put at
https://www.gnu.org/software/auctex/manual/auctex/Installation.html
Maybe a simpler solution is to use ELPA release. That's described in the
above document, too.
Regards,
Ikumi Keita
#StandWithUkraine #StopWarInUkraine
#Gaza #StopMassiveKilling #CeasefireNOW
Information forwarded
to
bug-auctex <at> gnu.org
:
bug#71902
; Package
auctex
.
(Thu, 04 Jul 2024 10:48:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 71902 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Yizhen,
>>>>> WANG Yizhen <wangyz <at> iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp> writes:
> Sorry for the inconvenience. I was using straight.el to install
> auctex,
If I understand correctly, straight.el uses ELPA package for AUCTeX.
Thus I expect you already have tex-site.el locally.
1. Is it sure that you lack tex-site.el? I'm not a straght.el user, but
if it installs ELPA packages in standard place, you will find it as
~/.emacs.d/elpa/auctex-X.Y.Z/tex-site.el
, where X, Y and Z are the version number.
2. If you cannot find tex-site.el where straight.el stores the package
contents, it means that your installation of AUCTeX is broken. I
recommend to delete the broken installation of AUCTeX and to
re-install it again. (I don't know how to do that in standard way of
straight.el.)
3. If that doesn't help yet, then I suspect that your straight.el isn't
working correctly. Maybe re-installing straight.el itself helps.
> and as I navigated to the repository directory, there was actually no
> tex-site.el there.
Yes, that's normal; tex-site.el is generated on the ELPA server and
bundled into the distribution files when a new AUCTeX ELPA release is
out.
...I realized that staright.el manifests itself as[2]
,----
| Packages are cloned as Git (or other) repositories, not as opaque tarballs.
`----
Then it really doesn't install tex-site.el?
...Hmm, straight.el needs special treatment for AUCTeX like this[3]
actually?
[1] https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/auctex.git
[2] https://github.com/radian-software/straight.el?tab=readme-ov-file
[3] https://github.com/radian-software/straight.el/issues/800
Regards,
Ikumi Keita
#StandWithUkraine #StopWarInUkraine
#Gaza #StopMassiveKilling #CeasefireNOW
Information forwarded
to
bug-auctex <at> gnu.org
:
bug#71902
; Package
auctex
.
(Thu, 04 Jul 2024 13:57:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 71902 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Keita,
Sorry for the inconvenience. I was using straight.el to install auctex,
and as I navigated to the repository directory, there was actually no
tex-site.el there. Maybe it is a problem of the straight packaging? I
will try to trace it further.
Best regards,
Yizhen
On 2024-07-03 14:54, Ikumi Keita wrote:
> Hi WANG,
>
>>>>>> WANG Yizhen <wangyz <at> iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp> writes:
>> Dear maintainers of auctex,
>> The current commit of auctex seemed to have packed tex-site.el.in
>> instead of tex-site.el, which makes auctex unusable. I look forward to
>> a quick fix.
> This isn't a bug; tex-site.el is generated from tex-site.el.in under
> standard installation process, namely configure&make. Follow the
> instruction included in the distribution or put at
> https://www.gnu.org/software/auctex/manual/auctex/Installation.html
>
> Maybe a simpler solution is to use ELPA release. That's described in the
> above document, too.
>
> Regards,
> Ikumi Keita
> #StandWithUkraine #StopWarInUkraine
> #Gaza #StopMassiveKilling #CeasefireNOW
Information forwarded
to
bug-auctex <at> gnu.org
:
bug#71902
; Package
auctex
.
(Fri, 12 Jul 2024 08:45:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #20 received at 71902 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Ikumi Keita <ikumi <at> ikumi.que.jp> writes:
>>>>>> WANG Yizhen <wangyz <at> iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp> writes:
>> Sorry for the inconvenience. I was using straight.el to install
>> auctex,
>
> If I understand correctly, straight.el uses ELPA package for AUCTeX.
> Thus I expect you already have tex-site.el locally.
> 1. Is it sure that you lack tex-site.el? I'm not a straght.el user, but
> if it installs ELPA packages in standard place, you will find it as
> ~/.emacs.d/elpa/auctex-X.Y.Z/tex-site.el
> , where X, Y and Z are the version number.
> 2. If you cannot find tex-site.el where straight.el stores the package
> contents, it means that your installation of AUCTeX is broken. I
> recommend to delete the broken installation of AUCTeX and to
> re-install it again. (I don't know how to do that in standard way of
> straight.el.)
> 3. If that doesn't help yet, then I suspect that your straight.el isn't
> working correctly. Maybe re-installing straight.el itself helps.
>
>> and as I navigated to the repository directory, there was actually no
>> tex-site.el there.
>
> Yes, that's normal; tex-site.el is generated on the ELPA server and
> bundled into the distribution files when a new AUCTeX ELPA release is
> out.
>
> ...I realized that staright.el manifests itself as[2]
> ,----
> | Packages are cloned as Git (or other) repositories, not as opaque tarballs.
> `----
> Then it really doesn't install tex-site.el?
> ...Hmm, straight.el needs special treatment for AUCTeX like this[3]
> actually?
>
> [1] https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/auctex.git
> [2] https://github.com/radian-software/straight.el?tab=readme-ov-file
> [3] https://github.com/radian-software/straight.el/issues/800
Any update on this? I think the issue is how to teach straight.el to
deal with AUCTeX, and not the way around. Or am I missing something?
Best, Arash
Information forwarded
to
bug-auctex <at> gnu.org
:
bug#71902
; Package
auctex
.
(Fri, 12 Jul 2024 12:02:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #23 received at 71902 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
After the update of auctex on elpa on July 12, this seemed fixed.
Best regards,
Yizhen
On 2024-07-12 17:44, Arash Esbati wrote:
> Ikumi Keita <ikumi <at> ikumi.que.jp> writes:
>
>>>>>>> WANG Yizhen <wangyz <at> iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp> writes:
>>> Sorry for the inconvenience. I was using straight.el to install
>>> auctex,
>> If I understand correctly, straight.el uses ELPA package for AUCTeX.
>> Thus I expect you already have tex-site.el locally.
>> 1. Is it sure that you lack tex-site.el? I'm not a straght.el user, but
>> if it installs ELPA packages in standard place, you will find it as
>> ~/.emacs.d/elpa/auctex-X.Y.Z/tex-site.el
>> , where X, Y and Z are the version number.
>> 2. If you cannot find tex-site.el where straight.el stores the package
>> contents, it means that your installation of AUCTeX is broken. I
>> recommend to delete the broken installation of AUCTeX and to
>> re-install it again. (I don't know how to do that in standard way of
>> straight.el.)
>> 3. If that doesn't help yet, then I suspect that your straight.el isn't
>> working correctly. Maybe re-installing straight.el itself helps.
>>
>>> and as I navigated to the repository directory, there was actually no
>>> tex-site.el there.
>> Yes, that's normal; tex-site.el is generated on the ELPA server and
>> bundled into the distribution files when a new AUCTeX ELPA release is
>> out.
>>
>> ...I realized that staright.el manifests itself as[2]
>> ,----
>> | Packages are cloned as Git (or other) repositories, not as opaque tarballs.
>> `----
>> Then it really doesn't install tex-site.el?
>> ...Hmm, straight.el needs special treatment for AUCTeX like this[3]
>> actually?
>>
>> [1] https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/auctex.git
>> [2] https://github.com/radian-software/straight.el?tab=readme-ov-file
>> [3] https://github.com/radian-software/straight.el/issues/800
> Any update on this? I think the issue is how to teach straight.el to
> deal with AUCTeX, and not the way around. Or am I missing something?
>
> Best, Arash
Reply sent
to
Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Fri, 12 Jul 2024 16:03:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
WANG Yizhen <wangyz <at> iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Fri, 12 Jul 2024 16:03:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #28 received at 71902-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
WANG Yizhen <wangyz <at> iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp> writes:
> After the update of auctex on elpa on July 12, this seemed fixed.
Thanks for the feedback. I'm closing this report.
Best, Arash
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sat, 10 Aug 2024 11:24:05 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 105 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.