GNU bug report logs - #72051
License compliance - pdbpp

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Matt Jolly <kangie <at> gentoo.org>

Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 04:31:02 UTC

Severity: normal

To reply to this bug, email your comments to 72051 AT debbugs.gnu.org.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#72051; Package guix. (Thu, 11 Jul 2024 04:31:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Matt Jolly <kangie <at> gentoo.org>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix <at> gnu.org. (Thu, 11 Jul 2024 04:31:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Matt Jolly <kangie <at> gentoo.org>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: License compliance - pdbpp
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 09:01:23 +1000
Hi Guix bug wranglers,

It's come to my attention that pdbpp (pdb++) is a noncompliant
derivative of CPython code and cannot be legally distributed;
the package claims a BSD 3 Clause license but as a derivative
of CPython code must be PSL-2.0.

https://github.com/pdbpp/pdbpp/issues/529

This software is packaged in your repository as:

https://packages.guix.gnu.org/packages/python-pdbpp/

Please take any appropriate action to prevent further infringement
while upstream considers their response.

Regards,

Matt Jolly
Gentoo Linux Developer






Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#72051; Package guix. (Thu, 11 Jul 2024 05:07:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 72051 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>
To: 72051 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Matt Jolly <kangie <at> gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: License compliance - pdbpp
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 00:06:17 -0500
> Please take any appropriate action to prevent further infringement
> while upstream considers their response.

Would you be interested in sending a patch for the license in that
package once upstream responds?
-- 
all the best,
jgart




Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#72051; Package guix. (Thu, 11 Jul 2024 05:35:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #11 received at 72051 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Zheng Junjie <zhengjunjie <at> iscas.ac.cn>
To: Matt Jolly <kangie <at> gentoo.org>, 72051 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#72051: License compliance - pdbpp
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 13:34:27 +0800
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Matt Jolly <kangie <at> gentoo.org> writes:

> Hi Guix bug wranglers,
>
> It's come to my attention that pdbpp (pdb++) is a noncompliant
> derivative of CPython code and cannot be legally distributed;
> the package claims a BSD 3 Clause license but as a derivative
> of CPython code must be PSL-2.0.
>
> https://github.com/pdbpp/pdbpp/issues/529
>
> This software is packaged in your repository as:
>
> https://packages.guix.gnu.org/packages/python-pdbpp/
>
> Please take any appropriate action to prevent further infringement
> while upstream considers their response.
>
> Regards,
>
> Matt Jolly
> Gentoo Linux Developer
Thanks, i remove it on https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=8cbc5e5bf0ca35f12cf5bbf123efbc3b6a57ad44
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 98 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.