GNU bug report logs - #72588
performance bug regarding CRC32 algorithm implementation

Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.

Package: gzip; Reported by: Daniel Ruf <ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN>; dated Mon, 12 Aug 2024 06:53:01 UTC; Maintainer for gzip is bug-gzip@HIDDEN.

Message received at 72588 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 72588) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Aug 2024 12:20:14 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Aug 16 08:20:13 2024
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51827 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1sevwC-0001Jw-Ti
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2024 08:20:13 -0400
Received: from mx-out.tlen.pl ([193.222.135.158]:34936)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <p.z.l@HIDDEN>) id 1serWX-00024N-QD
 for 72588 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2024 03:37:26 -0400
Received: (wp-smtpd smtp.tlen.pl 18181 invoked from network);
 16 Aug 2024 09:36:39 +0200
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=o2.pl; s=1024a;
 t=1723793799; bh=8sittpmX2n0ncFeoUSZIk3VhwHRz24+bQMPXAP7ek2s=;
 h=Subject:From:To;
 b=o0szju57d1/OVr3xj3mpueR8xYPuyKzb7AH6bDCnrk6N0u7+3252DRde4SvriFQ3c
 vtNfSfHeCwMWQJZiAr1UhVHWsao7I8Vy+YBCX21WE0ZKSnnx6jw/6BnIm/A1KwvieD
 bjGVP2F5Joq/CEaaqr70WglYCe6Ts9SESFyBeqoU=
Received: from localhost.localdomain (HELO localhost) ([46.134.106.54])
 (envelope-sender <p.z.l@HIDDEN>) by smtp.tlen.pl (WP-SMTPD) with SMTP
 for <bug-gzip@HIDDEN>; 16 Aug 2024 09:36:39 +0200
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="2KACIFTPJFPNDMBNKXTLInhgwp"
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: GWP-Draft
X-FactoryStamp: H---
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 09:36:39 +0200
X-Draft-Variant: reply
X-Draft-Parentmailid: 530c05b6c03856606a7f9911
X-Draft-Contenttype: text/html
Priority: normal
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_bug=2372588=3A_performance_bug_regarding_CRC32_algorithm_implementation?=
From: =?UTF-8?Q?p=2Ez=2El?= <p.z.l@HIDDEN>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_Ruf_via_=22GNU_gzip_discussion_and_bug_reports=2E?=
 <bug-gzip@HIDDEN>, =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_Ruf?= <ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN>,
 =?UTF-8?Q?72588=40debbugs=2Egnu=2Eorg?= <72588 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Message-ID: <f39e34139a224e3cbe1d9617e87fc647@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <<CA+_CZ9UNr17JrY076gjFKw7-4Lg6KMGNSvWTxy_zsq6ZpR=UQg@HIDDEN>>
References: <CA+_CZ9UNr17JrY076gjFKw7-4Lg6KMGNSvWTxy_zsq6ZpR=UQg@HIDDEN>
X-WP-MailID: dfbc3e8a8fe1aeba0ae89ab442cfff09
X-WP-AV: skaner antywirusowy Poczty o2
X-WP-SPAM: NO 0000010 [0YP0]                               
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 72588
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 08:20:11 -0400
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

--2KACIFTPJFPNDMBNKXTLInhgwp
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Is the article correct and the implementation should be updated, or is the =
 benchmark flawed?   I&#39;ll go classic - it&#39;s not a bug it&#39;s a fe=
ature.   lists.gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gzip/2023-11/=
msg00000.html=0D

--2KACIFTPJFPNDMBNKXTLInhgwp
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

<div><br></div><div class=3D"nh_extra"><blockquote class=3D"nh_quote" style=
=3D"border-left: 2px solid #999; padding-left: 8px; margin: 0;"><div id=3D"=
gwp7d01f648"><div>Is the article correct and the implementation should be u=
pdated, or is the<br></div><div>benchmark flawed?<br></div></div></blockquo=
te></div><div><br></div><div>I'll go classic - it's not a bug it's a featur=
e.<br></div><div><br></div><div><a href=3D"https://lists.gnu.org/archive/ht=
ml/bug-gzip/2023-11/msg00000.html">https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-g=
zip/2023-11/msg00000.html</a><br></div>
--2KACIFTPJFPNDMBNKXTLInhgwp--




Information forwarded to bug-gzip@HIDDEN:
bug#72588; Package gzip. Full text available.

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Aug 2024 12:20:14 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Aug 16 08:20:14 2024
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51829 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1sevwD-0001K3-U1
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2024 08:20:14 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:45658)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <p.z.l@HIDDEN>) id 1serWZ-00024a-6X
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2024 03:37:27 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <p.z.l@HIDDEN>) id 1serVx-0001Gl-MX
 for bug-gzip@HIDDEN; Fri, 16 Aug 2024 03:36:49 -0400
Received: from mx-out.tlen.pl ([193.222.135.158])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <p.z.l@HIDDEN>) id 1serVv-0005mf-7t
 for bug-gzip@HIDDEN; Fri, 16 Aug 2024 03:36:49 -0400
Received: (wp-smtpd smtp.tlen.pl 18181 invoked from network);
 16 Aug 2024 09:36:39 +0200
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=o2.pl; s=1024a;
 t=1723793799; bh=8sittpmX2n0ncFeoUSZIk3VhwHRz24+bQMPXAP7ek2s=;
 h=Subject:From:To;
 b=o0szju57d1/OVr3xj3mpueR8xYPuyKzb7AH6bDCnrk6N0u7+3252DRde4SvriFQ3c
 vtNfSfHeCwMWQJZiAr1UhVHWsao7I8Vy+YBCX21WE0ZKSnnx6jw/6BnIm/A1KwvieD
 bjGVP2F5Joq/CEaaqr70WglYCe6Ts9SESFyBeqoU=
Received: from localhost.localdomain (HELO localhost) ([46.134.106.54])
 (envelope-sender <p.z.l@HIDDEN>) by smtp.tlen.pl (WP-SMTPD) with SMTP
 for <bug-gzip@HIDDEN>; 16 Aug 2024 09:36:39 +0200
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="2KACIFTPJFPNDMBNKXTLInhgwp"
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: GWP-Draft
X-FactoryStamp: H---
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 09:36:39 +0200
X-Draft-Variant: reply
X-Draft-Parentmailid: 530c05b6c03856606a7f9911
X-Draft-Contenttype: text/html
Priority: normal
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_bug=2372588=3A_performance_bug_regarding_CRC32_algorithm_implementation?=
From: =?UTF-8?Q?p=2Ez=2El?= <p.z.l@HIDDEN>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_Ruf_via_=22GNU_gzip_discussion_and_bug_reports=2E?=
 <bug-gzip@HIDDEN>, =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_Ruf?= <ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN>,
 =?UTF-8?Q?72588=40debbugs=2Egnu=2Eorg?= <72588 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Message-ID: <f39e34139a224e3cbe1d9617e87fc647@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <<CA+_CZ9UNr17JrY076gjFKw7-4Lg6KMGNSvWTxy_zsq6ZpR=UQg@HIDDEN>>
References: <CA+_CZ9UNr17JrY076gjFKw7-4Lg6KMGNSvWTxy_zsq6ZpR=UQg@HIDDEN>
X-WP-MailID: dfbc3e8a8fe1aeba0ae89ab442cfff09
X-WP-AV: skaner antywirusowy Poczty o2
X-WP-SPAM: NO 0000010 [0YP0]                               
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=193.222.135.158; envelope-from=p.z.l@HIDDEN;
 helo=mx-out.tlen.pl
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001,
 SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 08:20:11 -0400
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--)

--2KACIFTPJFPNDMBNKXTLInhgwp
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Is the article correct and the implementation should be updated, or is the =
 benchmark flawed?   I&#39;ll go classic - it&#39;s not a bug it&#39;s a fe=
ature.   lists.gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gzip/2023-11/=
msg00000.html=0D

--2KACIFTPJFPNDMBNKXTLInhgwp
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

<div><br></div><div class=3D"nh_extra"><blockquote class=3D"nh_quote" style=
=3D"border-left: 2px solid #999; padding-left: 8px; margin: 0;"><div id=3D"=
gwp7d01f648"><div>Is the article correct and the implementation should be u=
pdated, or is the<br></div><div>benchmark flawed?<br></div></div></blockquo=
te></div><div><br></div><div>I'll go classic - it's not a bug it's a featur=
e.<br></div><div><br></div><div><a href=3D"https://lists.gnu.org/archive/ht=
ml/bug-gzip/2023-11/msg00000.html">https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-g=
zip/2023-11/msg00000.html</a><br></div>
--2KACIFTPJFPNDMBNKXTLInhgwp--




Information forwarded to bug-gzip@HIDDEN:
bug#72588; Package gzip. Full text available.

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Aug 2024 06:52:38 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Aug 12 02:52:38 2024
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42299 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1sdOv0-0008TR-IS
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 02:52:38 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:56810)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN>) id 1sdOuz-0008TJ-PU
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 02:52:38 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN>)
 id 1sdOuT-0005tD-NV
 for bug-gzip@HIDDEN; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 02:52:05 -0400
Received: from mail-ed1-x52d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::52d])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN>)
 id 1sdOuR-00085r-V4
 for bug-gzip@HIDDEN; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 02:52:05 -0400
Received: by mail-ed1-x52d.google.com with SMTP id
 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5a10835487fso5345677a12.1
 for <bug-gzip@HIDDEN>; Sun, 11 Aug 2024 23:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=googlemail.com; s=20230601; t=1723445522; x=1724050322; darn=gnu.org;
 h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject
 :date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=ZOO8f3TC5alKR7ZvBSxBZyAL4IW56OYRKE92J78DkEI=;
 b=Nhto9rRxmPQ7XmRoZl158GawCAJXmiLRq3FhOZcFu4TRPNZy3sJdUUzHeqBQGAttk2
 qX/9E7oAO5QqVwV/MRCqhK9nJ5gdlnDmZEKcJkIP9e1PNVIh4wAVOkCN+I4E/txFzMjh
 HZFTeuTrav5clSlg/fYt0COB2FtuaWFIlXE4XUq5bgjtxwFC+2oczFmxlZlQ0tdWSEF9
 1nZhbhQebpL3dcuxVVAwLWDxQU+AgLeU3jx+cHST1/A/SeH1zsL6hy5Duk7baq0Ra6KQ
 K9D4JYhYRVn/iwJTCuwBy5v+UAZxFZ2ugRTICShBsFV2xQgYvYEEBGRziIDe2MiuxFEz
 XtpQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1723445522; x=1724050322;
 h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state
 :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=ZOO8f3TC5alKR7ZvBSxBZyAL4IW56OYRKE92J78DkEI=;
 b=dqptH+MA53/bPXsdfsEJxYzcoKIy8CCIZLndzaFMFQWkktPd3tHNrLf3dh+fIvhZPI
 eGm6U8bQXDzUZl3Mg/xvH28uUCJcoY7WXosmURKxcSBOTlKfslmNktpnbAIA7igHTbzI
 iOzQT4h7VzQmHjdpB4QP4f1+wOETakeoac/7orbNr/r3SWX1faTLLd1qxHrBkazs24DR
 U0H79FDZVknK+jvLMWfT7Uzr1a4hXA1CdfPCGmJIqtGQoXaUabRiEHzltTdqhiDd1gIO
 qAmAqW8isvqGD1QeFuIYGTMNeF4+twhuPW6E0Y8BipniRa+gUNBqjD5xXKE/ZLhcSG2i
 wkbQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxZGLzQ/2bgB8FMKf3VwCW9aOnu1bgGSt9LLkmqZG1TtmdZd4rm
 qYmJFR9yitQTbRyfYMnebTKlS1vbwkOXSJ2fZYrpg915jU4paCLJ5H9AyfEZwI8nnfB01gVhIoA
 xr/zKTplwrs51P+R/IYSRwbMGwGuv0Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGdZkkJTyFqolhONpOvCDTjNfmxlNPKM1XF0B8o1xHZhorTYwEUqGjoJGP+q5PRt1IQ81RRtd1i7X2AKduF6YI=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7d90:b0:a7a:8e0f:aaf0 with SMTP id
 a640c23a62f3a-a80aa5dd5c6mr624010566b.36.1723445521784; Sun, 11 Aug 2024
 23:52:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Daniel Ruf <ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 08:51:50 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+_CZ9UNr17JrY076gjFKw7-4Lg6KMGNSvWTxy_zsq6ZpR=UQg@HIDDEN>
Subject: performance bug regarding CRC32 algorithm implementation
To: bug-gzip@HIDDEN
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001da80f061f76ee41"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::52d;
 envelope-from=ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN; helo=mail-ed1-x52d.google.com
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)

--0000000000001da80f061f76ee41
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

During my research regarding faster gzip implementations I found
https://medium.com/@techhara/speeding-up-system-gzip-by-60-75edbc8ac0e8

Is the article correct and the implementation should be updated, or is the
benchmark flawed?

--0000000000001da80f061f76ee41
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"auto">During my research regarding faster gzip implementations =
I found=C2=A0<a href=3D"https://medium.com/@techhara/speeding-up-system-gzi=
p-by-60-75edbc8ac0e8">https://medium.com/@techhara/speeding-up-system-gzip-=
by-60-75edbc8ac0e8</a><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Is the =
article correct and the implementation should be updated, or is the benchma=
rk flawed?</div></div>

--0000000000001da80f061f76ee41--




Acknowledgement sent to Daniel Ruf <ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-gzip@HIDDEN. Full text available.
Report forwarded to bug-gzip@HIDDEN:
bug#72588; Package gzip. Full text available.
Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.
Last modified: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 05:45:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.