Received: (at 72962) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2024 03:31:04 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 10 23:31:04 2024 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37450 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1soE4N-0005HL-Pg for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 23:31:03 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-f172.google.com ([209.85.167.172]:53376) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ncdehnel@HIDDEN>) id 1soE4M-0005Gr-8c for 72962 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 23:31:02 -0400 Received: by mail-oi1-f172.google.com with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3e03f0564c6so2050856b6e.2 for <72962 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 20:30:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1726025390; x=1726630190; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=7zPquDCtZyzOA5PY0kmGl8Aq5WV/QI7GoaYVVezsWQc=; b=mgsM5eXMjaeL+vSCcFLPW2AW/ImNx4XMs4EkLBcqIKo/TqnCYpFtsJKa1dolk+GnbL pwQn7qu/TpybiYUHv1IOY1/b+cUHGiLCJc+zwRDUPnPla9CfFcn2bY1n7tSkavdUy7XE 1tuhaim8WG9VVNLPMoiAMjYEYPsur5lyUwI91mIkizP4WO71ejabkD6sdDEPrVb8x2tb ufMTCLxBWfU5BB7mAbEdMEnXXPQWs5ZlIPvW/DDD+FfaCSfAunOlZhh+iL/r4yuQrMIG DBzsYQbybbERNnxpQWV5oifAC4BBux46lVf23KYzC8jTd/QhfQeREWQm3s6GaDOsAOB9 g5SA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1726025390; x=1726630190; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=7zPquDCtZyzOA5PY0kmGl8Aq5WV/QI7GoaYVVezsWQc=; b=VmIbULv4RA+jmyhnnnYwzhPLzGgvZ1G18Szc9f3GjA4ru+COPbJJpka13u1LG7JzMA ee6SmkHvuKqbrdickWm5dcQDH+oAbYc5NoT/3Yyd0vdd9wMguVvnn3ObAPst6Hb436+S g3ihCoeaObByABeuK1xn6czucvgMdKGuClJAYh/TvEkTA4W2uaLq19NQsp5extNL1hFe yYgUcit+0ZslxbBMMFwzSndEf+/zgcdJZEBh3xIPyHTKE83J+wQm16wXUUrS1XH0dPEX q+Yndo2knX4FwDh1ki0Dc8XY2fPo3rRQNwRJ5F5GzbRZOy4eAIAAqKmWuunwxrpVxsCQ QhtQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx/stNS6siQw4KP25F/Jw+1Yg7dSfcNU4nOup43Q+WEQb7LnDow qOY9m1eyRWwwRAGt3R748GF4Z+OynDwxZczzltK5jVtwAm7G7A07bu71sAGpUwBX7i/g6BmhnBG +PSZkEMMnXY4z+t6hiqcKad+uId9LVM9b X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFHf7/imDAwqU7G3QTFthLzliwysKqWTT6WYInYi0zI6ZSprGSHqRMlUvMuuAnRnV5gQ/PYG0BY/gtFmx5zr1M= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:238b:b0:3e0:3a72:e727 with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3e03a72f27dmr9370063b6e.23.1726025390128; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 20:29:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Nathan Dehnel <ncdehnel@HIDDEN> Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 22:29:39 -0500 Message-ID: <CAEEhgEtCXiJ8-ymcx93xYpjYjGCuDVWz_jempPrKd=77ULyg=Q@HIDDEN> Subject: php-8.3.10 build failure To: 72962 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 72962 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) ping
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#72962; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 72962) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Sep 2024 12:32:52 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Sep 04 08:32:52 2024
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33804 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1slpBr-0008GK-SJ
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2024 08:32:52 -0400
Received: from [81.190.248.246] (port=45734 helo=marekpasnikowski.pl)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <marek@HIDDEN>)
id 1slnKT-0004ri-TO; Wed, 04 Sep 2024 06:33:42 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost.local [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 23233604;
Wed, 4 Sep 2024 10:32:30 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=marekpasnikowski.pl; h=
from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:mime-version:content-type; s=dkim; bh=GfqubpR8I4+9iFTSv+JMiwXqt
zEq3nV6KwjbqTV+6qo=; b=YICK0Go6XL5/ZGwEobGa5QM8CuQK7DZeh+DNEYMy9
ARQA/WQRZJYJjwaW5SPTMIXk8EvWKBGEJLokfBzqDdEEIqCZMVBH6sb81MZTmpwN
TMSxDEp0Hfdo216V+AO3h4SO+fRv1WbazyEG6k3Kddmg2YAV+H8k0+DyUGoDuNiH
GpxVbFNtjgJ+ie3GzGBUi43k8Oo5yPRygA7mpeu31ROl7AXPXIL/u1Pnyq+G+CXn
KuFcZRGM5gyNHp00zXZ+7i4QY4eQTnY8hVz6uUPRRlKUvr6MzQ5KqRBYLv8WiumG
0eKA6g3tJYm++tezOqkG7tcSrzZfQRKIuWyCHyDZo2Zlw==
Received: by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 242c368c
(TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO);
Wed, 4 Sep 2024 10:32:30 +0000 (UTC)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Marek_Pa=C5=9Bnikowski?= <marek@HIDDEN>
To: Carlo Zancanaro <carlo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#72962: php-8.3.10 build failure
In-Reply-To: <87mskn3mlk.fsf@HIDDEN> (Carlo Zancanaro's message of
"Wed, 04 Sep 2024 17:27:19 +1000")
References: <87bk15eghd.fsf@HIDDEN>
<ac7837e79805d82097b172389a614146cd47108b.1725328494.git.carlo@HIDDEN>
<87cyljzzcw.fsf_-_@HIDDEN>
<87mskn3mlk.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2024 12:32:28 +0200
Message-ID: <878qw7zp37.fsf_-_@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 3.0 (+++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: The build completed and passed all the tests. Is this the
right moment to say reviewed-looks-good? Would I do it by writing the usertag
followed by thanks in the beginning of the message? Or am I confusing
concepts?
Content analysis details: (3.0 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
1.7 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
[URIs: marekpasnikowski.pl]
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 72962
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 04 Sep 2024 08:32:47 -0400
Cc: Rutherther <rutherther@HIDDEN>, 72962 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
72943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: The build completed and passed all the tests. Is this the
right moment to say reviewed-looks-good? Would I do it by writing the usertag
followed by thanks in the beginning of the message? Or am I confusing concepts?
Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
1.7 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
[URIs: marekpasnikowski.pl]
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
-1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
manager
The build completed and passed all the tests.
Is this the right moment to say reviewed-looks-good? Would I do it by
writing the usertag followed by thanks in the beginning of the message?
Or am I confusing concepts?
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#72962; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 72962) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Sep 2024 12:32:50 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Sep 04 08:32:50 2024
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33796 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1slpBq-0008Fr-43
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2024 08:32:50 -0400
Received: from [81.190.248.246] (port=58336 helo=marekpasnikowski.pl)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <marek@HIDDEN>)
id 1slkwO-0000cL-HO; Wed, 04 Sep 2024 04:00:37 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost.local [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id f1ab62bd;
Wed, 4 Sep 2024 07:59:30 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=marekpasnikowski.pl; h=
from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:mime-version:content-type; s=dkim; bh=m2YDhuiPP1XiJtYkRvRDW7WnL
MU5CltPlKgRLmTiprw=; b=GxpwZsocexFWGrlsi3FHIemejvVVhwTQ6bxjLe7Y8
kjApJB7JCevXPgXn6rpA9bmszNGNMKe9HDHmUpEWNSXwTT6F2sn14KXkrU/qs4JB
DqQoit+XWB6VlHj7EXKOBpkXowa7Lgi0z4unrTgVp6AN57YjiALmOAwpmnbUvhjJ
F/bOWCJUZpJ9teHNMBsbJg78A9ZLe0ZP9X901/n/Cb7r/Y4gNCfn2eS9Yy8qm9z1
txr437qyohMpO1CCZZluEVoHMjErh/ECWdN34Ba+ChHTLb6s6gIcpa3SpG/6Jafj
NjuowxWz4at39InLck5Fdkx55HsgUV+pFtoY8hGx0AaMw==
Received: by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 69eacbc3
(TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO);
Wed, 4 Sep 2024 07:59:29 +0000 (UTC)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Marek_Pa=C5=9Bnikowski?= <marek@HIDDEN>
To: Carlo Zancanaro <carlo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#72962: php-8.3.10 build failure
In-Reply-To: <87mskn3mlk.fsf@HIDDEN> (Carlo Zancanaro's message of
"Wed, 04 Sep 2024 17:27:19 +1000")
References: <87bk15eghd.fsf@HIDDEN>
<ac7837e79805d82097b172389a614146cd47108b.1725328494.git.carlo@HIDDEN>
<87cyljzzcw.fsf_-_@HIDDEN>
<87mskn3mlk.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2024 09:59:28 +0200
Message-ID: <87ttevq273.fsf_-_@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 3.0 (+++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Upon further inspection,
I noticed the second patch is missing
the From: <email> header. I copied it from the first patch and it applied.
The build is now in progress on my slow laptop, so I am sending this report
immediately.
Content analysis details: (3.0 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
1.7 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
[URIs: marekpasnikowski.pl]
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 72962
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 04 Sep 2024 08:32:47 -0400
Cc: Rutherther <rutherther@HIDDEN>, 72962 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
72943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Upon further inspection, I noticed the second patch is missing
the From: <email> header. I copied it from the first patch and it applied.
The build is now in progress on my slow laptop, so I am sending this report
immediately.
Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
1.7 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
[URIs: marekpasnikowski.pl]
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
-1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
manager
Upon further inspection, I noticed the second patch is missing the
From: <email> header. I copied it from the first patch and it applied.
The build is now in progress on my slow laptop, so I am sending this
report immediately.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#72962; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 72962) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Sep 2024 12:32:50 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Sep 04 08:32:50 2024
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33794 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1slpBp-0008Fj-Pn
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2024 08:32:50 -0400
Received: from [81.190.248.246] (port=46448 helo=marekpasnikowski.pl)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <marek@HIDDEN>)
id 1slkhC-00009y-05; Wed, 04 Sep 2024 03:44:56 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost.local [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id be3db921;
Wed, 4 Sep 2024 07:43:47 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=marekpasnikowski.pl; h=
from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:mime-version:content-type; s=dkim; bh=wopm4eyf9+7/+XUVi1znLGQrt
cCWS+egKoo/7vvdGyo=; b=DYhNKwV6Q6ctzcYpxReFxiHRbWyXtVs5e0eq36518
2xXaUTJ+xJmwhQ/buBZFz8Lew0mnK7z4+zRclLiKnwCgpHR1R8zg0YEu0m8zv7QZ
PAmYue/a+8wPZ/wKueOnK//IO7kTyS+fbUHT+x/OvF09l3MXsoFzOu3/ffJLxKTy
mSh6lu5WkeB+MdYN8mJtWmdKWbm03qdepIPmF7pnNEbDAFugdo7eDccLzwBwqhgE
xxE5KI/5FpqfzQ5mruivpNLBJ2vP6Hac47tUktO2EDZOTS8kNQcXO7DIJ1Gb99QO
ugQ1w4oSSAbpqbY+aiOX+j7rOiGRQqiVDsfe5yMXz5B/A==
Received: by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id e1a4ae27
(TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO);
Wed, 4 Sep 2024 07:43:47 +0000 (UTC)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Marek_Pa=C5=9Bnikowski?= <marek@HIDDEN>
To: Carlo Zancanaro <carlo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#72962: php-8.3.10 build failure
In-Reply-To: <87mskn3mlk.fsf@HIDDEN> (Carlo Zancanaro's message of
"Wed, 04 Sep 2024 17:27:19 +1000")
References: <87bk15eghd.fsf@HIDDEN>
<ac7837e79805d82097b172389a614146cd47108b.1725328494.git.carlo@HIDDEN>
<87cyljzzcw.fsf_-_@HIDDEN>
<87mskn3mlk.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2024 09:43:45 +0200
Message-ID: <87plpjrhhq.fsf_-_@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 3.0 (+++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Carlo Zancanaro <carlo@HIDDEN> writes: >> I
attempted
to build php with the following command: >> = >> guix build php
--with-patch=gd=patch-1.txt
--with-patch=php=patch-2.txt >> = > > You should be able to apply them in
a fresh clone of th [...]
Content analysis details: (3.0 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
1.7 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
[URIs: marekpasnikowski.pl]
1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 72962
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 04 Sep 2024 08:32:47 -0400
Cc: Rutherther <rutherther@HIDDEN>, 72962 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
72943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Carlo Zancanaro <carlo@HIDDEN> writes: >> I attempted
to build php with the following command: >> = >> guix build php --with-patch=gd=patch-1.txt
--with-patch=php=patch-2.txt >> = > > You should be able to apply them in
a fresh clone of th [...]
Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
1.7 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
[URIs: marekpasnikowski.pl]
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
-1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
manager
Carlo Zancanaro <carlo@HIDDEN> writes:
>> I attempted to build php with the following command:
>> =
>> guix build php --with-patch=gd=patch-1.txt --with-patch=php=patch-2.txt
>> =
>
> You should be able to apply them in a fresh clone of the repository with
> "git am $patch-name". To build, you can follow the instructions in the
> manual "(guix) Building from Git". After that, you can build PHP with
> these patches with "./pre-inst-env guix build php".
>
I had a guix clone from previous attempts to patch things, so I
proceeded to apply the patches. Patch 1 returned a message along the
lines (translation) of "apply: * gnu/packages/gd.scm (gd): Change inputs
to propagated-inputs". However,
=
LC_ALL=C git am ../Downloads/patch-2.txt
Patch format detection failed.
=
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#72962; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 72962) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Sep 2024 07:24:39 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Sep 04 03:24:39 2024
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33233 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1slkNa-00080u-Nr
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2024 03:24:39 -0400
Received: from [81.190.248.246] (port=57622 helo=marekpasnikowski.pl)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <marek@HIDDEN>)
id 1sljrp-00078K-3e; Wed, 04 Sep 2024 02:51:52 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost.local [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id fd799f9a;
Wed, 4 Sep 2024 06:50:40 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=marekpasnikowski.pl; h=
from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=dkim;
bh=fUD3SV4MhgmAu7ahsEwsj2Jp7K8+zSbv0lrUHmnt/KE=; b=gYVm35KaRfTo
ioGMqSTM0Nr67siXiXCA1oaYvI6c3x7JE1SAtbXacZv2rEmIZOTW9pgnxUh3J6Iz
ClCAu/5BqjrtC2TF8ZTbjZjCr0QCf9CG1AN4eh6zbRtPkBELc7WXc0IAMHA96jpi
kMEQ5a7+H0GuVClJyNnjLXjK/9dh1TAZYTrDaFO6vj1Wg1MDo8nhzRg1VCypUHIO
PkKw1vX/uBwXeZ+Kuapg1wxEMC5VXqucGJshEz6LZl7E3dRPjiXkBSDWXtckNf/A
nQwXyLOLB0KUoAM/rQ81PDe3hFQrAsoCaM4o+j51J2tFE1gEKgQYjCJ+I9Lywjns
yhVz0Wt6cA==
Received: by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id f3bd40a4
(TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO);
Wed, 4 Sep 2024 06:50:40 +0000 (UTC)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Marek_Pa=C5=9Bnikowski?= <marek@HIDDEN>
To: Carlo Zancanaro <carlo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#72962: php-8.3.10 build failure
In-Reply-To: <ac7837e79805d82097b172389a614146cd47108b.1725328494.git.carlo@HIDDEN>
(Carlo Zancanaro's message of "Tue, 3 Sep 2024 11:54:54 +1000")
References: <87bk15eghd.fsf@HIDDEN>
<ac7837e79805d82097b172389a614146cd47108b.1725328494.git.carlo@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2024 08:50:39 +0200
Message-ID: <87cyljzzcw.fsf_-_@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 3.0 (+++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Carlo Zancanaro <carlo@HIDDEN> writes: > * gnu/packages/php.scm
(php)[arguments]: Delete three tests that are known to > fail. > This is
my first time composing a patch review — I am not sure if I am doing it
correctly.
Content analysis details: (3.0 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
1.7 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
[URIs: marekpasnikowski.pl]
1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 72962
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 04 Sep 2024 03:24:36 -0400
Cc: Rutherther <rutherther@HIDDEN>, 72962 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
72943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Carlo Zancanaro <carlo@HIDDEN> writes: > * gnu/packages/php.scm
(php)[arguments]: Delete three tests that are known to > fail. > This is
my first time composing a patch review — I am not sure if I am doing it
correctly.
Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
1.7 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
[URIs: marekpasnikowski.pl]
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
-1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
manager
Carlo Zancanaro <carlo@HIDDEN> writes:
> * gnu/packages/php.scm (php)[arguments]: Delete three tests that are know=
n to
> fail.
>
This is my first time composing a patch review =E2=80=94 I am not sure if I=
am
doing it correctly.
I attempted to build php with the following command:
=3D
guix build php --with-patch=3Dgd=3Dpatch-1.txt --with-patch=3Dphp=3Dpatch-2=
.txt
=3D
The text files are files saved by using the =E2=80=9Cdownload=E2=80=9D opti=
on of the web
interface of Guix Issues. My understanding is that the patch to gd
applies cleanly, but the patch to php does not:
=3D
source is at 'php-8.3.10'
applying '/gnu/store/f2zxspb49cbcmcla3mbjrikl48kmbf52-patch-2.txt'...
can't find file to patch at input line 13
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|* gnu/packages/php.scm (php)[arguments]: Delete three tests that are known=
to
|fail.
|
|Change-Id: Ib684328654c75f37111d252fb0f9fb3356daff9a
|---
| gnu/packages/php.scm | 7 +++++++
| 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
|
|diff --git a/gnu/packages/php.scm b/gnu/packages/php.scm
|index 8f879dbdca..ce7458d0e5 100644
|--- a/gnu/packages/php.scm
|+++ b/gnu/packages/php.scm
--------------------------
No file to patch. Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
patch unexpectedly ends in middle of line
=3D
Is this helpful?
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#72962; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 72962) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Sep 2024 21:55:38 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Sep 02 17:55:38 2024
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52810 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1slF1N-0007pS-Ih
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2024 17:55:38 -0400
Received: from mail-40133.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.133]:29649)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <rutherther@HIDDEN>) id 1slArW-0006Vt-V9
for 72962 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2024 13:29:13 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com;
s=protonmail3; t=1725298083; x=1725557283;
bh=NqRfdQDQFu2S7YfBzlacr+RFfI6Yo9LRbC8NCU9Rs90=;
h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:
Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID:BIMI-Selector;
b=ph6m1dat6wYXExat0aNqknyrLjBUtOBPsaALOnTgXznygUcghOABsPsXjZU6VYneo
u2SRSYqLy3gzwDnmKkJMpxhZyKFkgfh8GAGhliPX2rYEx3Z5Ueej1UubsGYkdZ0GIn
X+gLIoCvrUz2TX96T4hhzdx/sBFU5E1eshizvAdCocepMxHCpkkSBHLOcdwou4MzYy
wFhJ5KBqwPWmlfVBVZtF97/O9TA+u5TNmo9sIXIl6KbQYFfS6hzYwR1aXEOp46DbP9
YDC8Tn5fsmbAy9ORDg2IVh3yJ0bjBNXjZ/li1N6uV/KH4hfEaYDR0xI+MVCxJ8bfkN
jvcC/QnfGHXtg==
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2024 17:27:59 +0000
To: 72962 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Rutherther <rutherther@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: php-8.3.10 build failure
Message-ID: <87frqi2cf6.fsf@HIDDEN>
Feedback-ID: 8107604:user:proton
X-Pm-Message-ID: afb2292918f6c40961199ca8acc2767999a2df63
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 72962
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 02 Sep 2024 17:55:32 -0400
Cc: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
Hello everyone,
note that the linked issue solves this only partially.
It fixes gd itself, but then there are still three
failing tests in php.
I suggest this as current workaround locally:
---
(use-modules
(guix packages)
(gnu packages gd)
(gnu packages php))
(define gd-fixed
(package/inherit gd
(name "gd-fixed")
(propagated-inputs
(package-inputs gd))))
(define php
(package/inherit php
(inputs (modify-inputs (package-inputs php)
(replace "gd" gd-fixed)))))
php
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#72962; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
Full text available.Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
Full text available.Received: (at 72962) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Sep 2024 11:49:13 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Sep 02 07:49:13 2024 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46652 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1sl5YW-0007tz-Nd for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2024 07:49:13 -0400 Received: from tobias.gr ([80.241.217.52]:58096) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <me@HIDDEN>) id 1sl5YT-0007tX-J9; Mon, 02 Sep 2024 07:49:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=2018; bh=9kx8g5IYiDXks 1860Fk9OwhkNIpVjeX6yBnVjIizPWY=; h=references:in-reply-to:subject:cc: to:from:date; d=tobias.gr; b=nrZpU5H9ITfLxrNFQP5eIdcoaZEIjEONaK+0+T+ZR dCITYTp6JGFpnMaxVkWDw/nCE44kshoRdxUYlJUdCASZp9YhrNyc8WyhWzxYzpyvwCctFr /1OLKsq4voDBtLRWSQTZIsa0hhBDOoCeNMxooaFUUD8RS+SpNocA8AG9IoNwpHbrkmJu3A OtHa7dFSGbgaIKgAH6Y74VvPUhfQbHCuGX1J03x7eLjOLFHPaJyib5FzYtwQaJjx8eQcIJ CWl1S3q/F0988prHhyeCnSGC+Db3rudFvxA1QRF1eRg2MXkMMouAR578+fwy0TaZ7gws12 uWRwnwNOE7bROW3p/i38A== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 20492207; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 11:48:03 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2024 13:48:03 +0200 From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN> To: =?UTF-8?Q?Marek_Pa=C5=9Bnikowski?= <marek@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#72962: php-8.3.10 build failure In-Reply-To: <87plpmiaey.fsf@HIDDEN> References: <87plpmiaey.fsf@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <7028ea249a468048c40100a3bd070024@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 72962 Cc: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 72962 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) merge 72943 72962 thanks ^ bot commands Hi Marek, > I apologize for not posting a patch, but I am still wrapping my head > around concepts more fundamental than patch submission. Good news! I've merged this issue with the likely cause and a possible fix. > For example, I > think it is a good idea to Cc the PHP team here, but failed to find > documentation on how to identify the team’s email address. Teams don't have addresses/aliases, so you could have kept looking. The teams are defined[0] in the Guix git repository, to facilitate automation[1] integrated with ‘git send-email’, and to keep one consistent source of truth. If those examples look too complicated, ignore them, and just manually look up your favourite team members :-) Kind regards, T G-R Sent from a Web browser. Excuse or enjoy my brevity. [0]: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/etc/teams.scm [1]: https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/html_node/Teams.html
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#72962; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Sep 2024 11:39:01 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Sep 02 07:39:01 2024 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46306 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1sl5Od-0007PO-S4 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2024 07:39:01 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:35342) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <marek@HIDDEN>) id 1sl4sX-0005q3-21 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2024 07:05:49 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <marek@HIDDEN>) id 1sl4rX-00039y-HG for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Mon, 02 Sep 2024 07:04:47 -0400 Received: from [81.190.248.246] (helo=marekpasnikowski.pl) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <marek@HIDDEN>) id 1sl4rS-0004VI-56 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Mon, 02 Sep 2024 07:04:47 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.local [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 8a097302 for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 11:04:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=marekpasnikowski.pl; h= from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=dkim; bh=hslS3azW1z+pcIzrHTYEkfd+E PyT+++wmCcVMvdlWsI=; b=NLSUBYIg4iQoqa5A5ce2JrSuHokbeZOqJzRJl+m+h 8S9ZwdMgvK9KCvoDdvgMh1xUch+1YjT+h9OEP7Z2iP6TJNASDcKM7hRYPXqo6LgB iV8xlBgWQpJD67tSgIyoj+pj694+UajTBm0fn84u+CfRhcbvV6+WAu8J4BIr9XuS N0IDqhJCsTXXx3RNctP7/VAjo/jSTjs1OmcvCxg1Y1+nRCc9qtdLlb8iOaJy6und 2W1UEOlnAwG5Mj4gSMArdVoILFolPDuABHSHVctEcLIPIv4GF0nJvoXUvvz2hHS7 nzKeK8gugXx/gEcMLNRsDTtqkKwZ0HXnSxf4dfsuxAW8Q== Received: by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id aabfad3e (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 11:04:37 +0000 (UTC) From: =?utf-8?Q?Marek_Pa=C5=9Bnikowski?= <marek@HIDDEN> To: bug-guix@HIDDEN Subject: php-8.3.10 build failure Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2024 13:04:37 +0200 Message-ID: <87plpmiaey.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 81.190.248.246 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=81.190.248.246; envelope-from=marek@HIDDEN; helo=marekpasnikowski.pl X-Spam_score_int: -12 X-Spam_score: -1.3 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 02 Sep 2024 07:38:55 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Good morning or afternoon. I am not able to update my system due to the following build failure: standard output context ~ The following derivations will be built: /gnu/store/m7jd9csjwb8yvznassm2mgkx8nyx9m0q-easyeffects-7.1.7.drv /gnu/store/1gr6a27wls2xlykjqkgy51pxv8c5hfmi-lsp-plugins-1.2.15.drv /gnu/store/gxjs8dzg8gmif2gj1ybkxxzv623qpq4q-php-8.3.10.drv ~ build log context ~ configure: error: Package requirements (gdlib >=3D 2.1.0) were not met: Package 'freetype2', required by 'gdlib', not found ~ I checked with the source code of (gnu packages php) =E2=80=94 freetype doe= s not exist in the file. I apologize for not posting a patch, but I am still wrapping my head around concepts more fundamental than patch submission. For example, I think it is a good idea to Cc the PHP team here, but failed to find documentation on how to identify the team=E2=80=99s email address.
Marek Paśnikowski <marek@HIDDEN>:bug-guix@HIDDEN.
Full text available.bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#72962; Package guix.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.