GNU logs - #73435, boring messages

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#73435: gzdoom package probably depends on non-free files forbidding commercial distribution
Resent-From: Mamao@HIDDEN
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 08:33:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.73435.B.172708035524450 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 73435 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Mamao@HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 03:38:38 -0300
Message-ID: <y13i27td.fsf@gnu-plus-liberated-linux>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.17.147; envelope-from=Mamao@HIDDEN;
 helo=danwin1210.de
X-Spam_score_int: 12
X-Spam_score: 1.2
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam_report: (1.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335,
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001,
 SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: 2.2 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview:  https://zdoom.org/wiki/License talks about files included
 in GZDoom that forbid verbatim commercial distribution, violating GNU FSDG,
 which demands that even data not serving practical purpose must al [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (2.2 points, 10.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 0.9 SPF_FAIL               SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail)
 [SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom;
 id=mamao%40danwin1210.de; ip=209.51.188.17; r=debbugs.gnu.org]
 -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
 -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED      RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS        RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS
 [185.220.101.33 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
 -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE   No description available.
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 04:32:24 -0400
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  https://zdoom.org/wiki/License talks about files included
   in GZDoom that forbid verbatim commercial distribution, violating GNU FSDG,
    which demands that even data not serving practical purpose must al [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (1.2 points, 10.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.9 SPF_FAIL               SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail)
 [SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom;id=mamao%40danwin1210.de;ip=209.51.188.17;r=debbugs.gnu.org]
 -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
  3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS        RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS
                             [185.220.101.33 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
 -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED      RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
                             medium trust
                             [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE   No description available.
 -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
                             manager


https://zdoom.org/wiki/License talks about files included in GZDoom that
forbid verbatim commercial distribution, violating GNU FSDG, which
demands that even data not serving practical purpose must allow
commercial distribution.

After trying to delete all the files in GZDoom forbidding commercial
distribution, I was unable to get GZDoom working so it seems that these
files are a hard requirement of GZDoom and that GZDoom won't work
without them. I believe these files are found in
/usr(/local)/share/games/doom/ after GZDoom is installed, but I'm not
sure. The package for Guix says:

"-DGUIX_OUT_PK3=\\\"" out "/share/games/doom\\\""

I've even tried to stop the generation of these files during compile
time to see if that would help gzdoom work without them, but that broke
compilation.

Since gzdoom doesn't seem to work without these non-free files, that
arguably makes gzdoom proprietary software because commercial verbatim
distribution is forbidden when these files are in place. If gzdoom is
proprietary software, then the freedoom package is violating the FSDG as
it strongly recommends gzdoom in its documentation, therefore to make
freedoom FSDG-compliant would likely shunning the recommendation for
gzdoom. This issue affects not only Guix System but also other
FSDG-compliant distros, because e.g. PureOS and Trisquel also ship
Freedoom with the recommendation to use gzdoom.

-- 
All the works that are 100% my own, in my emails and elsewhere, are
libre (free as in freedom) and in public domain, see
https://pst.moe/paste/yhsdsh to know more

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Mamao@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#73435: Acknowledgement (gzdoom package probably depends on
 non-free files forbidding commercial distribution)
Message-ID: <handler.73435.B.172708035524450.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <y13i27td.fsf@gnu-plus-liberated-linux>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 73435
X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix
Reply-To: 73435 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 08:33:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-guix@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 73435 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
73435: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D73435
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#73435: gzdoom package probably depends on non-free files forbidding commercial distribution
Resent-From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 09:17:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.73435.B.17270829881331 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Mamao@HIDDEN, 73435 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 09:15:50 +0000
From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <y13i27td.fsf@gnu-plus-liberated-linux>
References: <y13i27td.fsf@gnu-plus-liberated-linux>
Message-ID: <5C1D717F-4E95-420A-B253-809EDC56ADEF@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:c205:2020:6054::1; envelope-from=me@HIDDEN;
 helo=tobias.gr
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--)

Hi!

Thanks for reporting your findings=2E

On 23 September 2024 06:38:38 UTC, Mamao--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix <=
bug-guix@gnu=2Eorg> wrote:
>After trying to delete all the files in GZDoom forbidding commercial
>distribution, I was unable to get GZDoom working so it seems that these
>files are a hard requirement of GZDoom and that GZDoom won't work
>without them=2E

This directly contradicts the link[0] you referenced=2E  Would you agree?

Let's not jump to the conclusion that GZDoom must be removed=2E  Removal i=
s the last step, not the first=2E

That of course doesn't mean than you're wrong, only that upstream has a di=
fferent opinion=2E  Did you ask them about it?  What did they say?

For example, I wouldn't *expect* simply omitting the data files to suffice=
, if there's optional code that also needs to be --disabled=2E  Did you loo=
k into that?


Kind regards,

T G-R

Sent on the go=2E  Excuse or enjoy my brevity=2E

[0]: https://zdoom=2Eorg/wiki/License

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#73435: gzdoom package probably depends on non-free files forbidding commercial distribution
Resent-From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 09:17:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.73435.B73435.17270829831314 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Mamao@HIDDEN, 73435 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 09:15:50 +0000
From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <y13i27td.fsf@gnu-plus-liberated-linux>
References: <y13i27td.fsf@gnu-plus-liberated-linux>
Message-ID: <5C1D717F-4E95-420A-B253-809EDC56ADEF@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

Hi!

Thanks for reporting your findings=2E

On 23 September 2024 06:38:38 UTC, Mamao--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix <=
bug-guix@gnu=2Eorg> wrote:
>After trying to delete all the files in GZDoom forbidding commercial
>distribution, I was unable to get GZDoom working so it seems that these
>files are a hard requirement of GZDoom and that GZDoom won't work
>without them=2E

This directly contradicts the link[0] you referenced=2E  Would you agree?

Let's not jump to the conclusion that GZDoom must be removed=2E  Removal i=
s the last step, not the first=2E

That of course doesn't mean than you're wrong, only that upstream has a di=
fferent opinion=2E  Did you ask them about it?  What did they say?

For example, I wouldn't *expect* simply omitting the data files to suffice=
, if there's optional code that also needs to be --disabled=2E  Did you loo=
k into that?


Kind regards,

T G-R

Sent on the go=2E  Excuse or enjoy my brevity=2E

[0]: https://zdoom=2Eorg/wiki/License

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#73435: gzdoom package probably depends on non-free files forbidding commercial distribution
References: <y13i27td.fsf@gnu-plus-liberated-linux>
Resent-From: Mamao@HIDDEN
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 13:26:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.73435.B.172709794622478 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 73435
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>
Cc: 73435 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: 73435 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-guix@HIDDEN
Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.172709794622478
          (code B ref -1); Mon, 23 Sep 2024 13:26:01 +0000
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Sep 2024 13:25:46 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43491 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1ssj4S-0005qS-L3
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2024 09:25:45 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:57204)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Mamao@HIDDEN>) id 1ssfoz-0002VN-PD
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2024 05:57:35 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Mamao@HIDDEN>)
 id 1ssfoc-0001EL-Mn
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Mon, 23 Sep 2024 05:57:10 -0400
Received: from danwin1210.de ([116.202.17.147])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Mamao@HIDDEN>)
 id 1ssfoa-0001QN-Ig
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Mon, 23 Sep 2024 05:57:10 -0400
Received: from gnu-plus-liberated-linux (27.tor-exit.nothingtohide.nl
 [192.42.116.179])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)
 server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested)
 by danwin1210.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 76C673EB4A;
 Mon, 23 Sep 2024 09:57:02 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=danwin1210.de;
 s=20211204-rsa; t=1727085425;
 h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
 in-reply-to:in-reply-to; bh=TqgXNCfqSjs61oBUeCIeVEnbvVshTZU39iPWj+2egbM=;
 b=RnDgveNxNGtiHTVeNHczbizf8vI1AkGvzRJLq6IlHdstYTSHmO95Bi4CYedess6hN18dCq
 K0pDVmBalfay0m37o+yicV1tPVYH8FfMeFrxj9kZ/SKLn7BD5naUVACo0nEuJi99bml8JN
 jhzCiPGKquGRxSn4otifRo77cNX7qdDXD30KLvOdq+lvoF9tslCIjF8/nf4fFyx4dlljVz
 JJTyKZzxIfasmXVpBsqW+tOrV8z0GZHBhyMBYn8E5FRsobuYdUQfjO5mAvvMRMFDn4a6GK
 oHoD9g/gsiPkjcEgHR89sstURTV9n+atti0pFZwm1k96I51EqvV+hu4gA1L6zg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=danwin1210.de;
 s=20211204-ed25519; t=1727085425;
 h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
 in-reply-to:in-reply-to; bh=TqgXNCfqSjs61oBUeCIeVEnbvVshTZU39iPWj+2egbM=;
 b=FchoygT5zI1ZSBY+YB9xuxaD7+ZRxPtDO/q7lVXD/Qgm890L32OYwbz1YW4dmPyp+YgNGu
 tf59eIe2YVs3N4AQ==
From: Mamao@HIDDEN
In-Reply-To: <5C1D717F-4E95-420A-B253-809EDC56ADEF@HIDDEN> (message from
 Tobias Geerinckx-Rice on Mon, 23 Sep 2024 09:15:50 +0000)
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 06:18:20 -0300
Message-ID: <4j66u3s3.fsf@gnu-plus-liberated-linux>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.17.147; envelope-from=Mamao@HIDDEN;
 helo=danwin1210.de
X-Spam_score_int: 26
X-Spam_score: 2.6
X-Spam_bar: ++
X-Spam_report: (2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.347,
 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: 3.4 (+++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN> writes: >>After trying
 to delete all the files in GZDoom forbidding commercial >>distribution, I
 was unable to get GZDoom working so it seems that these >>files are a hard
 requirement of GZDoom and that GZDoo [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (3.4 points, 10.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED      RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS        RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS
 [192.42.116.179 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
 0.9 SPF_FAIL               SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail)
 [SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom;
 id=mamao%40danwin1210.de; ip=209.51.188.17; r=debbugs.gnu.org]
 -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
 1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in
 bl.spamcop.net
 [Blocked - see <https://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?192.42.116.179>]
 -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE   No description available.
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 09:25:43 -0400
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 2.4 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN> writes: >>After trying
    to delete all the files in GZDoom forbidding commercial >>distribution, I
    was unable to get GZDoom working so it seems that these >>files are a hard
    requirement of GZDoom and that GZDoo [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (2.4 points, 10.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED      RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
                             medium trust
                             [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org]
  3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS        RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS
                             [192.42.116.179 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
  1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in
                             bl.spamcop.net
              [Blocked - see <https://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?192.42.116.179>]
  0.9 SPF_FAIL               SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail)
 [SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom;id=mamao%40danwin1210.de;ip=209.51.188.17;r=debbugs.gnu.org]
 -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
 -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE   No description available.
 -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
                             manager

Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN> writes:

>>After trying to delete all the files in GZDoom forbidding commercial
>>distribution, I was unable to get GZDoom working so it seems that these
>>files are a hard requirement of GZDoom and that GZDoom won't work
>>without them.
>
> This directly contradicts the link[0] you referenced.  Would you
> agree?

Yes, indeed

> Let's not jump to the conclusion that GZDoom must be removed.  Removal
> is the last step, not the first.

Yeah, sorry.

> That of course doesn't mean than you're wrong, only that upstream has
> a different opinion. Did you ask them about it? What did they say?

I can't find any way that would be suitable for me to contact them,
sorry

After looking for some time at
https://forum.zdoom.org/search.php?keywords=commercial&sid=8494f77771bc9efb089cfc0d688adf44
it doesn't seem to mention anything about the
non-commercial-distribution-only data

>
> For example, I wouldn't *expect* simply omitting the data files to
> suffice, if there's optional code that also needs to be --disabled.
> Did you look into that?

I studied the source code and didn't find anything that allowed the
disabling the requirement for non-free data, and didn't find any
--disable options for gzdoom itselff, but I don't know much about cmake
(which is used by gzdoom during building) so perhaps I missed something

-- 
All the works that are 100% my own, in my emails and elsewhere, are
libre (free as in freedom) and in public domain, see
https://pst.moe/paste/yhsdsh to know more

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#73435: gzdoom package probably depends on non-free files forbidding commercial distribution
References: <y13i27td.fsf@gnu-plus-liberated-linux>
Resent-From: Mamao@HIDDEN
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 13:26:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.73435.B73435.172709794622484 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 73435
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>
Cc: 73435 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: 73435 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-guix@HIDDEN
Received: via spool by 73435-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B73435.172709794622484
          (code B ref 73435); Mon, 23 Sep 2024 13:26:02 +0000
Received: (at 73435) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Sep 2024 13:25:46 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43493 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1ssj4T-0005qV-S4
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2024 09:25:46 -0400
Received: from danwin1210.de ([116.202.17.147]:52143)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Mamao@HIDDEN>) id 1ssfpU-0002WN-QH
 for 73435 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2024 05:58:06 -0400
Received: from gnu-plus-liberated-linux (27.tor-exit.nothingtohide.nl
 [192.42.116.179])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)
 server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested)
 by danwin1210.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 76C673EB4A;
 Mon, 23 Sep 2024 09:57:02 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=danwin1210.de;
 s=20211204-rsa; t=1727085425;
 h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
 in-reply-to:in-reply-to; bh=TqgXNCfqSjs61oBUeCIeVEnbvVshTZU39iPWj+2egbM=;
 b=RnDgveNxNGtiHTVeNHczbizf8vI1AkGvzRJLq6IlHdstYTSHmO95Bi4CYedess6hN18dCq
 K0pDVmBalfay0m37o+yicV1tPVYH8FfMeFrxj9kZ/SKLn7BD5naUVACo0nEuJi99bml8JN
 jhzCiPGKquGRxSn4otifRo77cNX7qdDXD30KLvOdq+lvoF9tslCIjF8/nf4fFyx4dlljVz
 JJTyKZzxIfasmXVpBsqW+tOrV8z0GZHBhyMBYn8E5FRsobuYdUQfjO5mAvvMRMFDn4a6GK
 oHoD9g/gsiPkjcEgHR89sstURTV9n+atti0pFZwm1k96I51EqvV+hu4gA1L6zg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=danwin1210.de;
 s=20211204-ed25519; t=1727085425;
 h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
 in-reply-to:in-reply-to; bh=TqgXNCfqSjs61oBUeCIeVEnbvVshTZU39iPWj+2egbM=;
 b=FchoygT5zI1ZSBY+YB9xuxaD7+ZRxPtDO/q7lVXD/Qgm890L32OYwbz1YW4dmPyp+YgNGu
 tf59eIe2YVs3N4AQ==
From: Mamao@HIDDEN
In-Reply-To: <5C1D717F-4E95-420A-B253-809EDC56ADEF@HIDDEN> (message from
 Tobias Geerinckx-Rice on Mon, 23 Sep 2024 09:15:50 +0000)
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 06:18:20 -0300
Message-ID: <4j66u3s3.fsf@gnu-plus-liberated-linux>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 4.8 (++++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN> writes: >>After trying
 to delete all the files in GZDoom forbidding commercial >>distribution, I
 was unable to get GZDoom working so it seems that these >>files are a hard
 requirement of GZDoom and that GZDoo [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (4.8 points, 10.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS        RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS
 [192.42.116.179 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
 1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in
 bl.spamcop.net
 [Blocked - see <https://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?192.42.116.179>]
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
 -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE   No description available.
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 09:25:43 -0400
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 3.8 (+++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN> writes: >>After trying
    to delete all the files in GZDoom forbidding commercial >>distribution, I
    was unable to get GZDoom working so it seems that these >>files are a hard
    requirement of GZDoom and that GZDoo [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (3.8 points, 10.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS        RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS
                             [192.42.116.179 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
  1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in
                             bl.spamcop.net
              [Blocked - see <https://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?192.42.116.179>]
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
 -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE   No description available.
 -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
                             manager

Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN> writes:

>>After trying to delete all the files in GZDoom forbidding commercial
>>distribution, I was unable to get GZDoom working so it seems that these
>>files are a hard requirement of GZDoom and that GZDoom won't work
>>without them.
>
> This directly contradicts the link[0] you referenced.  Would you
> agree?

Yes, indeed

> Let's not jump to the conclusion that GZDoom must be removed.  Removal
> is the last step, not the first.

Yeah, sorry.

> That of course doesn't mean than you're wrong, only that upstream has
> a different opinion. Did you ask them about it? What did they say?

I can't find any way that would be suitable for me to contact them,
sorry

After looking for some time at
https://forum.zdoom.org/search.php?keywords=commercial&sid=8494f77771bc9efb089cfc0d688adf44
it doesn't seem to mention anything about the
non-commercial-distribution-only data

>
> For example, I wouldn't *expect* simply omitting the data files to
> suffice, if there's optional code that also needs to be --disabled.
> Did you look into that?

I studied the source code and didn't find anything that allowed the
disabling the requirement for non-free data, and didn't find any
--disable options for gzdoom itselff, but I don't know much about cmake
(which is used by gzdoom during building) so perhaps I missed something

-- 
All the works that are 100% my own, in my emails and elsewhere, are
libre (free as in freedom) and in public domain, see
https://pst.moe/paste/yhsdsh to know more

Message sent to adam.faiz@HIDDEN, liliana.prikler@HIDDEN, iyzsong@HIDDEN, bug-guix@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#73435: [PATCH] gnu: gzdoom: Delete files that prohibit commercial redistribution.
References: <y13i27td.fsf@gnu-plus-liberated-linux>
In-Reply-To: <y13i27td.fsf@gnu-plus-liberated-linux>
Resent-From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: adam.faiz@HIDDEN, liliana.prikler@HIDDEN, iyzsong@HIDDEN, bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 16:58:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.73435.B73435.17271106333373 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 73435
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: 73435 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Adam Faiz <adam.faiz@HIDDEN>, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>, =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6?= <iyzsong@HIDDEN>
X-Debbugs-Original-Xcc: Adam Faiz <adam.faiz@HIDDEN>, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>, =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6?= <iyzsong@HIDDEN>
Received: via spool by 73435-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B73435.17271106333373
          (code B ref 73435); Mon, 23 Sep 2024 16:58:02 +0000
Received: (at 73435) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Sep 2024 16:57:13 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44680 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1ssmN6-0000sL-K7
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2024 12:57:13 -0400
Received: from tobias.gr ([80.241.217.52]:47062)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <me@HIDDEN>) id 1ssmMz-0000rz-PD
 for 73435 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2024 12:57:10 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=2018; bh=Hm2tTrte7BwD3
 U0a9xAxrMyv4pVwbx3E3W0Mz06ZNx8=; h=date:subject:to:from;
 d=tobias.gr; 
 b=CHByrHVBrNXG0I5wM6u5W4MPoNxU9CkrzBmAydoNisav1afpCgMFggsf49hTLwa2mI3f
 omROiHLSmScYFrj8VU8lStGZCUs5l/Db/4dRormEas+xZC3GNUH+HvsJNkk6TZVRnXkqWk
 QjacpADz7ICxGKG/ryRyNB2CBKPAmpQ6cTqc10yAM7mkW3a8ugWI3jClQQQw3jL2pHS+6R
 g8WoDqIBPAjszaWjAOyXD7gBp0VyE1xtAuT81B97TMEmr0Oi9MQx2b64AGabfKXaac2EBE
 fupwla/9IHEPNGIQhSTuiE4kC6ABqEnqI/3ZA+E0A42zbTfKF3Zi5NR3OxHI2uIQ==
Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id ed3e15c1
 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for <73435 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>;
 Mon, 23 Sep 2024 16:56:35 +0000 (UTC)
From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 02:00:00 +0200
Message-ID: <0bebafb4aea39e0d8abf27a949717ffe291b9d75.1726963200.git.me@HIDDEN>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.46.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)

See <https://zdoom.org/wiki/License#Commercial_use>.

* gnu/packages/games.scm (gzdoom)[source]: Delete files in the snippet.

Change-Id: I601bb251e9b690e375f707786bb5789a6a664b92
---

This still needs refinement.  I need to read the source, find out
*why* the wiki page tells us not to redistribute game_support.pk3
commercially.  Maybe there's a way around deleting it entirely.
Without it GZDoom finds not a single WAD, free or not.

 gnu/packages/games.scm | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/games.scm b/gnu/packages/games.scm
index 8aa828a8a4..c5fc59fd07 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/games.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/games.scm
@@ -8068,6 +8068,18 @@ (define-public gzdoom
        (modules '((guix build utils)))
        (snippet
         '(begin
+           ;; Remove files which can't be commercially redistributed according
+           ;; to <https://zdoom.org/wiki/License>.
+           (for-each
+            (lambda (directory)
+              (delete-file-recursively directory)
+              (substitute* "CMakeLists.txt"
+                (((string-append "add_subdirectory\\([[:blank:]]*"
+                                 directory
+                                 "[[:blank:]]*\\)"))
+                 "")))
+            (list "wadsrc_bm"           ;brightmaps.pk3
+                  #;"wadsrc_extra"))    ;game_support.pk3 XXX breaks Freedoom
            ;; Remove some bundled libraries.  XXX There are more, but removing
            ;; them would require, at least, patching the build system.
            (with-directory-excursion "libraries"

base-commit: 2da3c37e7d732f6d2744f70be9fd98858a433b5e
prerequisite-patch-id: 3aa23428693688751bb14a2fbe464f5693ae13d7
prerequisite-patch-id: 3f0ca744a21be95e47c8c9105dfe1e7fd0dc59c7
-- 
2.46.0

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#73435: [PATCH] gnu: gzdoom: Delete files that prohibit commercial redistribution.
Resent-From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 17:07:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.73435.B73435.17271111805521 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 73435
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>
Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6?= <iyzsong@HIDDEN>, 73435 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>, Adam Faiz <adam.faiz@HIDDEN>
Received: via spool by 73435-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B73435.17271111805521
          (code B ref 73435); Mon, 23 Sep 2024 17:07:01 +0000
Received: (at 73435) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Sep 2024 17:06:20 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44688 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1ssmVv-0001Qy-QS
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2024 13:06:20 -0400
Received: from tobias.gr ([80.241.217.52]:58120)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <me@HIDDEN>) id 1ssmVt-0001Qm-9k
 for 73435 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2024 13:06:18 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=2018; bh=AdKr+oN4emqf4
 tz986ICvOhSsCjLChe3khLjg3rCm/U=;
 h=references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:
 to:from:date; d=tobias.gr; b=CO0ShZtRRhgU0Evu7IcSk1bEkSMgi3CmbKsSMFRaR
 gVPihlYBnkqfA/EhAApyYREBE/3qRXlhiYU0E7j75KldLNu1wPuGo2ESuLV6W/JCIGvolE
 qiG20NmZrgL5L02bBjvHp8oOWHzkUZ4kQNUDkfDlvdHG01iJ9RGRCPdcWWZWMS5yjTapTA
 n9Bh+UFIeyUhELG4fXR3IlqNlmTf3BCZ/7PdQ6kX+modXcT4d1cUuWqxTI4DVryvnkCNxv
 7aD5Z8S9o20CwmxPXI6rD0oUk3NL/bwhvcoKP3+O1SrojBS6AA1htA4t0RqsmT6nawO1xB
 CrJCNTurCGHteuGQCnXcw==
Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 30ea917d;
 Mon, 23 Sep 2024 17:05:47 +0000 (UTC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 19:05:47 +0200
From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <0bebafb4aea39e0d8abf27a949717ffe291b9d75.1726963200.git.me@HIDDEN>
References: <y13i27td.fsf@gnu-plus-liberated-linux>
 <0bebafb4aea39e0d8abf27a949717ffe291b9d75.1726963200.git.me@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <da2c30211233906b7448e12bde29e83a@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

On 2024-09-22 2:00, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix 
wrote:
> Without it GZDoom finds not a single WAD, free or not.

Oh.  No mystery here if wadsrc_extra/static/iwadinfo.txt does what it 
looks like (explicitly list all supported WADs and how to identify 
them).  That can't be copyrightable, at least, so that's good news.

Let's see if we can include the list without including any problematic 
files.

Kind regards,

T G-R

Sent from a Web browser.  Excuse or enjoy my brevity.

Message sent to adam.faiz@HIDDEN, liliana.prikler@HIDDEN, iyzsong@HIDDEN, bug-guix@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#73435: [PATCH v2] gnu: gzdoom: Delete files that might prevent commercial distribution.
References: <y13i27td.fsf@gnu-plus-liberated-linux>
In-Reply-To: <y13i27td.fsf@gnu-plus-liberated-linux>
Resent-From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: adam.faiz@HIDDEN, liliana.prikler@HIDDEN, iyzsong@HIDDEN, bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 22:07:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.73435.B73435.172721557915635 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 73435
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: 73435 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Adam Faiz <adam.faiz@HIDDEN>, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>, =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6?= <iyzsong@HIDDEN>
X-Debbugs-Original-Xcc: Adam Faiz <adam.faiz@HIDDEN>, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>, =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6?= <iyzsong@HIDDEN>
Received: via spool by 73435-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B73435.172721557915635
          (code B ref 73435); Tue, 24 Sep 2024 22:07:02 +0000
Received: (at 73435) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Sep 2024 22:06:19 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43878 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1stDfm-000447-K4
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 18:06:19 -0400
Received: from tobias.gr ([80.241.217.52]:51338)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <me@HIDDEN>) id 1stDfj-00043r-2E
 for 73435 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 18:06:16 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=2018; bh=6gBF5YiEux992
 C5IR1K5L71Zcu5k2myYruANHreHVnI=; h=date:subject:to:from;
 d=tobias.gr; 
 b=L3YFbJGWa2vsr93L/RazwDTnu2b14fFr3YhJ8P3Kp3DxzM+4vJWp7gbmApvgVCHSFali
 gFW1SvToX2gLx3xwAZlC/7CYHcmAWEPo7mMjt+ic0IBhyAX1HbKcA0Mw5Bj9kst3MEob+M
 bUi8UkIoddYixFB16aDbn0IC928A7psZKCnHYxfHSPvIu8B4GeNrJDV/gRKzpQM+oZM5mQ
 o9jy7bQQBjOVAx8j4c0t4uhEPRvvVnXHhPL6iCXUtYCJ4Ww07ip6F2mvZEfPqOVq/7uh/z
 jHBg3vo1+jIS3CW2zwLUhnwGlM3rD1HpT55m3MlEW8t93Rl0zIQca2G/zZb299ZQ==
Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 624e428f
 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for <73435 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>;
 Tue, 24 Sep 2024 22:05:44 +0000 (UTC)
From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 02:00:01 +0200
Message-ID: <82144a28256c392b568b57644c331a4ad7d7dd50.1726963201.git.me@HIDDEN>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.46.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

* gnu/packages/games.scm (gzdoom)[source]: Delete files in the snippet.

Change-Id: I601bb251e9b690e375f707786bb5789a6a664b92
---
 gnu/packages/games.scm | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 gnu/packages/vim.scm   |  4 ++--
 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/games.scm b/gnu/packages/games.scm
index 8aa828a8a4..0c695f5dca 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/games.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/games.scm
@@ -8065,9 +8065,45 @@ (define-public gzdoom
         (base32 "0i4hyg72z84fc6ca2ic9q82q5cbgrbd7bynl3kpkypxvyasq08wz"))
        (patches (search-patches "gzdoom-search-in-installed-share.patch"
                                 "gzdoom-find-system-libgme.patch"))
-       (modules '((guix build utils)))
+       (modules '((guix build utils)
+                  (ice-9 regex)))
        (snippet
         '(begin
+           ;; Remove files which mustn't be commercially redistributed.  See
+           ;; <https://zdoom.org/wiki/License#Commercial_use>, the ‘Contribution
+           ;; Guidelines’ at <https://github.com/ZDoom>, and Guix issue #73435.
+           (for-each
+            (lambda (directory)
+              (delete-file-recursively directory)
+              (substitute* "CMakeLists.txt"
+                (((string-append "add_subdirectory\\([[:blank:]]*"
+                                 directory
+                                 "[[:blank:]]*\\)"))
+                 "")))
+            '( ;; "wadsrc_extra"        ;game_support.pk3
+              "wadsrc_bm"))             ;brightmaps.pk3
+
+           ;; Removing game_support.pk3 entirely would break Freedoom & remove
+           ;; users' ability to play commercial games, despite owning (only) the
+           ;; non-functional data.  That can't be right.  Out of an abundance of
+           ;; caution, remove anything from the PK3 that could conceivably be
+           ;; derived from copyrightable data that's not freely redistributable.
+           (display "Keeping only the following game_support.pk3 files:\n")
+           (let* ((regexps (list "/font\\.inf$"
+                                 "/harmony/.*\\.(txt|zs)$"
+                                 "/(iwadinfo|mapinfo|sprofs)\\.txt$"
+                                 "\\.z$"))
+                  (regexp* (format #f "(~{~a~^|~})" regexps))
+                  (regexp  (make-regexp regexp* regexp/icase)))
+             (define (keep-file? file stat)
+               (let ((keep? (regexp-exec regexp file)))
+                 (when keep?
+                   (format #t "  ~a~%" file))
+                 keep?))
+
+             (for-each delete-file (find-files "wadsrc_extra/static"
+                                               (negate keep-file?))))
+
            ;; Remove some bundled libraries.  XXX There are more, but removing
            ;; them would require, at least, patching the build system.
            (with-directory-excursion "libraries"
diff --git a/gnu/packages/vim.scm b/gnu/packages/vim.scm
index 786a85ab58..136ed5f0c9 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/vim.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/vim.scm
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ (define-module (gnu packages vim)
 (define-public vim
   (package
     (name "vim")
-    (version "9.1.0146")
+    (version "9.1.0737")
     (source (origin
              (method git-fetch)
              (uri (git-reference
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ (define-public vim
              (file-name (git-file-name name version))
              (sha256
               (base32
-               "05lz8ai39p9ypk22n7qc7g21868m08pl12sn4028jshx5nxwy2zn"))))
+               "1777vbr43prh9pqhz1lr5b1nym61iyy66yzxbhwichd3spnlrblk"))))
     (build-system gnu-build-system)
     (arguments
      `(#:test-target "test"

base-commit: 2da3c37e7d732f6d2744f70be9fd98858a433b5e
prerequisite-patch-id: 3aa23428693688751bb14a2fbe464f5693ae13d7
prerequisite-patch-id: 3f0ca744a21be95e47c8c9105dfe1e7fd0dc59c7
-- 
2.46.0

Last modified: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 05:45:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.