X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#74523: 31.0.50; `apply` elements screw up undo in region
Resent-From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: monnier@HIDDEN, bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 06:20:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.74523.B.173251559318187 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: report 74523
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords:
To: 74523 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: monnier@HIDDEN
X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
X-Debbugs-Original-Xcc: monnier@HIDDEN
Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.173251559318187
(code B ref -1); Mon, 25 Nov 2024 06:20:01 +0000
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2024 06:19:53 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37570 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1tFSRs-0004jH-Mt
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:19:53 -0500
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:46978)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <monnier@HIDDEN>) id 1tFSRq-0004j7-Pm
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:19:51 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <monnier@HIDDEN>)
id 1tFSRq-0003VA-IW
for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:19:50 -0500
Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50])
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <monnier@HIDDEN>)
id 1tFSRo-0001cJ-Ll
for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:19:50 -0500
Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4BFD44409F5
for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:19:45 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca;
s=mail; t=1732515584;
bh=94VUKxvRL6yoKfiO+LKnY64IAGycH3mZh7zlH331LXo=;
h=From:To:Subject:Date:From;
b=jyuY4gF9GioetwDQql87LXVFxxMbpsKBvt5oKd1uxGELxY9o3cS98UfiAl2lXTEUj
ipupNyHKH7Qo9ZkozLxWQ6FvztGlngPuR0RsK9iX9od4SVjc8i3SseocHAEAYgb+yc
eat0liTTpbViNfwhGl+Mn6uPCH1Qq5J7G/iplVP2OPZKtNueBK4P6qJJgJX6AsIoHC
0i1iPljryNDLp4Z0KzX8keFrbh3dez+qCFjT5+ia/RrDa7da0okO/+Jc34FFJMzQUt
zhfCjFBwBO6Ki6MO8RicFEzuhz1b5oKusEaGldX2jcDNw1kS6NE9r5dij2xUvp79Mw
YGv4UaqcvMyXA==
Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1])
by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 571C94401E0
for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:19:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from pastel (104-195-225-43.cpe.teksavvy.com [104.195.225.43])
by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3DEFF1204E2
for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:19:44 -0500 (EST)
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <jwv34jfon6j.fsf-monnier+@gnu.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:19:43 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-SPAM-INFO: Spam detection results: 0
ALL_TRUSTED -1 Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
AWL -0.018 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
domain
DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from
domain
X-SPAM-LEVEL:
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50;
envelope-from=monnier@HIDDEN; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca
X-Spam_score_int: -42
X-Spam_score: -4.3
X-Spam_bar: ----
X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3,
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001,
SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
Package: Emacs
Version: 31.0.50
We currently don't support `apply` undo-elements very well (if at all)
in the undo-in-region feature.
Those elements used to be rare, but now that `comment-region` and other
users of `combine-change-calls` generate them, it's not as rare.
The following test fails because of that:
(ert-deftest simple-tests--undo-apply ()
(with-temp-buffer
(modula-2-mode) ;; A simple mode with non-LF terminated comments.
(buffer-enable-undo)
(insert "foo\n\n")
(let ((midbeg (point-marker))
(_ (insert "midmid"))
(midend (point-marker)))
(insert "\n\nbar")
(undo-boundary)
(goto-char (+ midbeg 3))
(insert "\n")
(undo-boundary)
(comment-region (point-min) midbeg)
(undo-boundary)
(comment-region midend (point-max))
(undo-boundary)
(progn
(goto-char midbeg)
(set-mark midend)
(setq last-command 'something-else) ;Not `undo', so we start a new run.
(undo '(4))
(should (equal (buffer-substring midbeg midend) "midmid")))
)))
- Stefan
Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN> Subject: bug#74523: Acknowledgement (31.0.50; `apply` elements screw up undo in region) Message-ID: <handler.74523.B.173251559318187.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org> References: <jwv34jfon6j.fsf-monnier+@gnu.org> X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 74523 X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs Reply-To: 74523 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 06:20:01 +0000 Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. As you requested using X-Debbugs-CC, your message was also forwarded to monnier@HIDDEN (after having been given a bug report number, if it did not have one). Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please send it to 74523 <at> debbugs.gnu.org. Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. --=20 74523: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D74523 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#74523: 31.0.50; `apply` elements screw up undo in region
Resent-From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:20:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.74523.B74523.173254798818937 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 74523
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords:
To: 74523 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 74523-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B74523.173254798818937
(code B ref 74523); Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:20:02 +0000
Received: (at 74523) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2024 15:19:48 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40029 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1tFasO-0004vN-Bt
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 10:19:48 -0500
Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:28157)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <monnier@HIDDEN>) id 1tFasM-0004v7-4G
for 74523 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 10:19:47 -0500
Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2FA1B100154;
Mon, 25 Nov 2024 10:19:39 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca;
s=mail; t=1732547978;
bh=s29zm+c9PLOPHe55FHoDPviNBFTn8reSI8msh0kt074=;
h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From;
b=ElCbnSvUtvv7lZUMp4O714gGbLSvM1FVFQfRDl98xT+Fo+HjwsG0Gk/f73xuOW609
eaQeCQ1sY2E6r6cLAnqv5xQvXVmFxe/R+PETiXIHXnz1R2a3psWT5NvmmvjKedwqOc
DVMqFskua6FbmzQ/TNbMPnTBYbkxgCRz1TCng1eTxyq1fCfXr8K94Gn3voJM9iIsff
OMlE1dCLqrtAum0JbfOlfYmJUCsQPXW+yxG6fPVpXjnPQI6m07IqcBPnS+DthN+GRy
DERf+5wVlkyHI/zQKteknmXsZGwEjvlX1tFMS6pFiealW6ou4pC2vfgVvr+vPU42GC
5Q9XAj1pD+lGg==
Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1])
by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8587C100035;
Mon, 25 Nov 2024 10:19:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: from pastel (104-195-225-43.cpe.teksavvy.com [104.195.225.43])
by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 62A6E12030F;
Mon, 25 Nov 2024 10:19:38 -0500 (EST)
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <jwv34jfon6j.fsf-monnier+@gnu.org> (Stefan Monnier's message of
"Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:19:43 -0500")
Message-ID: <jwvwmgrmjjf.fsf-monnier+emacs@HIDDEN>
References: <jwv34jfon6j.fsf-monnier+@gnu.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 10:19:36 -0500
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-SPAM-INFO: Spam detection results: 0
ALL_TRUSTED -1 Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
AWL -0.001 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
domain
DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from
domain
X-SPAM-LEVEL:
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)
> We currently don't support `apply` undo-elements very well (if at all)
> in the undo-in-region feature.
> Those elements used to be rare, but now that `comment-region` and other
> users of `combine-change-calls` generate them, it's not as rare.
I pushed a patch which fixes the test I sent, but `apply` elements are
still never included in undo-in-region.
Fixing that won't be easy in general: we have no way for
`undo-adjust-elt` to handle them correctly.
Stefan
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.