X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#74523: 31.0.50; `apply` elements screw up undo in region Resent-From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-CC: monnier@HIDDEN, bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 06:20:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.74523.B.173251559318187 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: report 74523 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 74523 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Cc: monnier@HIDDEN X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN X-Debbugs-Original-Xcc: monnier@HIDDEN Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.173251559318187 (code B ref -1); Mon, 25 Nov 2024 06:20:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2024 06:19:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37570 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tFSRs-0004jH-Mt for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:19:53 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:46978) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <monnier@HIDDEN>) id 1tFSRq-0004j7-Pm for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:19:51 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <monnier@HIDDEN>) id 1tFSRq-0003VA-IW for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:19:50 -0500 Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <monnier@HIDDEN>) id 1tFSRo-0001cJ-Ll for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:19:50 -0500 Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4BFD44409F5 for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:19:45 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1732515584; bh=94VUKxvRL6yoKfiO+LKnY64IAGycH3mZh7zlH331LXo=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=jyuY4gF9GioetwDQql87LXVFxxMbpsKBvt5oKd1uxGELxY9o3cS98UfiAl2lXTEUj ipupNyHKH7Qo9ZkozLxWQ6FvztGlngPuR0RsK9iX9od4SVjc8i3SseocHAEAYgb+yc eat0liTTpbViNfwhGl+Mn6uPCH1Qq5J7G/iplVP2OPZKtNueBK4P6qJJgJX6AsIoHC 0i1iPljryNDLp4Z0KzX8keFrbh3dez+qCFjT5+ia/RrDa7da0okO/+Jc34FFJMzQUt zhfCjFBwBO6Ki6MO8RicFEzuhz1b5oKusEaGldX2jcDNw1kS6NE9r5dij2xUvp79Mw YGv4UaqcvMyXA== Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 571C94401E0 for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:19:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from pastel (104-195-225-43.cpe.teksavvy.com [104.195.225.43]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3DEFF1204E2 for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:19:44 -0500 (EST) From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <jwv34jfon6j.fsf-monnier+@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:19:43 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SPAM-INFO: Spam detection results: 0 ALL_TRUSTED -1 Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP AWL -0.018 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain X-SPAM-LEVEL: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@HIDDEN; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Package: Emacs Version: 31.0.50 We currently don't support `apply` undo-elements very well (if at all) in the undo-in-region feature. Those elements used to be rare, but now that `comment-region` and other users of `combine-change-calls` generate them, it's not as rare. The following test fails because of that: (ert-deftest simple-tests--undo-apply () (with-temp-buffer (modula-2-mode) ;; A simple mode with non-LF terminated comments. (buffer-enable-undo) (insert "foo\n\n") (let ((midbeg (point-marker)) (_ (insert "midmid")) (midend (point-marker))) (insert "\n\nbar") (undo-boundary) (goto-char (+ midbeg 3)) (insert "\n") (undo-boundary) (comment-region (point-min) midbeg) (undo-boundary) (comment-region midend (point-max)) (undo-boundary) (progn (goto-char midbeg) (set-mark midend) (setq last-command 'something-else) ;Not `undo', so we start a new run. (undo '(4)) (should (equal (buffer-substring midbeg midend) "midmid"))) ))) - Stefan
Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN> Subject: bug#74523: Acknowledgement (31.0.50; `apply` elements screw up undo in region) Message-ID: <handler.74523.B.173251559318187.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org> References: <jwv34jfon6j.fsf-monnier+@gnu.org> X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 74523 X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs Reply-To: 74523 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 06:20:01 +0000 Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. As you requested using X-Debbugs-CC, your message was also forwarded to monnier@HIDDEN (after having been given a bug report number, if it did not have one). Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please send it to 74523 <at> debbugs.gnu.org. Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. --=20 74523: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D74523 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#74523: 31.0.50; `apply` elements screw up undo in region Resent-From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.74523.B74523.173254798818937 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 74523 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 74523 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 74523-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B74523.173254798818937 (code B ref 74523); Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:20:02 +0000 Received: (at 74523) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2024 15:19:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40029 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tFasO-0004vN-Bt for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 10:19:48 -0500 Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:28157) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <monnier@HIDDEN>) id 1tFasM-0004v7-4G for 74523 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 10:19:47 -0500 Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2FA1B100154; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 10:19:39 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1732547978; bh=s29zm+c9PLOPHe55FHoDPviNBFTn8reSI8msh0kt074=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=ElCbnSvUtvv7lZUMp4O714gGbLSvM1FVFQfRDl98xT+Fo+HjwsG0Gk/f73xuOW609 eaQeCQ1sY2E6r6cLAnqv5xQvXVmFxe/R+PETiXIHXnz1R2a3psWT5NvmmvjKedwqOc DVMqFskua6FbmzQ/TNbMPnTBYbkxgCRz1TCng1eTxyq1fCfXr8K94Gn3voJM9iIsff OMlE1dCLqrtAum0JbfOlfYmJUCsQPXW+yxG6fPVpXjnPQI6m07IqcBPnS+DthN+GRy DERf+5wVlkyHI/zQKteknmXsZGwEjvlX1tFMS6pFiealW6ou4pC2vfgVvr+vPU42GC 5Q9XAj1pD+lGg== Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8587C100035; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 10:19:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from pastel (104-195-225-43.cpe.teksavvy.com [104.195.225.43]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 62A6E12030F; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 10:19:38 -0500 (EST) From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <jwv34jfon6j.fsf-monnier+@gnu.org> (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:19:43 -0500") Message-ID: <jwvwmgrmjjf.fsf-monnier+emacs@HIDDEN> References: <jwv34jfon6j.fsf-monnier+@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 10:19:36 -0500 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SPAM-INFO: Spam detection results: 0 ALL_TRUSTED -1 Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP AWL -0.001 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain X-SPAM-LEVEL: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > We currently don't support `apply` undo-elements very well (if at all) > in the undo-in-region feature. > Those elements used to be rare, but now that `comment-region` and other > users of `combine-change-calls` generate them, it's not as rare. I pushed a patch which fixes the test I sent, but `apply` elements are still never included in undo-in-region. Fixing that won't be easy in general: we have no way for `undo-adjust-elt` to handle them correctly. Stefan
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.