GNU logs - #74523, boring messages


Message sent to monnier@HIDDEN, bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#74523: 31.0.50; `apply` elements screw up undo in region
Resent-From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: monnier@HIDDEN, bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 06:20:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.74523.B.173251559318187 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: report 74523
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: 74523 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: monnier@HIDDEN
X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
X-Debbugs-Original-Xcc: monnier@HIDDEN
Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.173251559318187
          (code B ref -1); Mon, 25 Nov 2024 06:20:01 +0000
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2024 06:19:53 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37570 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1tFSRs-0004jH-Mt
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:19:53 -0500
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:46978)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <monnier@HIDDEN>) id 1tFSRq-0004j7-Pm
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:19:51 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <monnier@HIDDEN>)
 id 1tFSRq-0003VA-IW
 for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:19:50 -0500
Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <monnier@HIDDEN>)
 id 1tFSRo-0001cJ-Ll
 for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:19:50 -0500
Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4BFD44409F5
 for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:19:45 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca;
 s=mail; t=1732515584;
 bh=94VUKxvRL6yoKfiO+LKnY64IAGycH3mZh7zlH331LXo=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:From;
 b=jyuY4gF9GioetwDQql87LXVFxxMbpsKBvt5oKd1uxGELxY9o3cS98UfiAl2lXTEUj
 ipupNyHKH7Qo9ZkozLxWQ6FvztGlngPuR0RsK9iX9od4SVjc8i3SseocHAEAYgb+yc
 eat0liTTpbViNfwhGl+Mn6uPCH1Qq5J7G/iplVP2OPZKtNueBK4P6qJJgJX6AsIoHC
 0i1iPljryNDLp4Z0KzX8keFrbh3dez+qCFjT5+ia/RrDa7da0okO/+Jc34FFJMzQUt
 zhfCjFBwBO6Ki6MO8RicFEzuhz1b5oKusEaGldX2jcDNw1kS6NE9r5dij2xUvp79Mw
 YGv4UaqcvMyXA==
Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1])
 by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 571C94401E0
 for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:19:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from pastel (104-195-225-43.cpe.teksavvy.com [104.195.225.43])
 by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3DEFF1204E2
 for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:19:44 -0500 (EST)
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <jwv34jfon6j.fsf-monnier+@gnu.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:19:43 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-SPAM-INFO: Spam detection results:  0
 ALL_TRUSTED                -1 Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 AWL -0.018 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DKIM_SIGNED               0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
 not necessarily valid
 DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
 DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
 domain
 DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from
 domain
X-SPAM-LEVEL: 
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50;
 envelope-from=monnier@HIDDEN; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca
X-Spam_score_int: -42
X-Spam_score: -4.3
X-Spam_bar: ----
X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3,
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001,
 SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)

Package: Emacs
Version: 31.0.50


We currently don't support `apply` undo-elements very well (if at all)
in the undo-in-region feature.
Those elements used to be rare, but now that `comment-region` and other
users of `combine-change-calls` generate them, it's not as rare.

The following test fails because of that:

    (ert-deftest simple-tests--undo-apply ()
      (with-temp-buffer
        (modula-2-mode) ;; A simple mode with non-LF terminated comments.
        (buffer-enable-undo)
        (insert "foo\n\n")
        (let ((midbeg (point-marker))
              (_ (insert "midmid"))
              (midend (point-marker)))
          (insert "\n\nbar")
          (undo-boundary)
          (goto-char (+ midbeg 3))
          (insert "\n")
          (undo-boundary)
          (comment-region (point-min) midbeg)
          (undo-boundary)
          (comment-region midend (point-max))
          (undo-boundary)
          (progn
            (goto-char midbeg)
            (set-mark midend)
            (setq last-command 'something-else) ;Not `undo', so we start a new run.
            (undo '(4))
            (should (equal (buffer-substring midbeg midend) "midmid")))
          )))

- Stefan





Message sent:


Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#74523: Acknowledgement (31.0.50; `apply` elements screw up
 undo in region)
Message-ID: <handler.74523.B.173251559318187.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <jwv34jfon6j.fsf-monnier+@gnu.org>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 74523
X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs
Reply-To: 74523 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 06:20:01 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

As you requested using X-Debbugs-CC, your message was also forwarded to
  monnier@HIDDEN
(after having been given a bug report number, if it did not have one).

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 74523 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
74523: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D74523
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems


Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#74523: 31.0.50; `apply` elements screw up undo in region
Resent-From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:20:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.74523.B74523.173254798818937 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 74523
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: 74523 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 74523-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B74523.173254798818937
          (code B ref 74523); Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:20:02 +0000
Received: (at 74523) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2024 15:19:48 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40029 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1tFasO-0004vN-Bt
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 10:19:48 -0500
Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:28157)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <monnier@HIDDEN>) id 1tFasM-0004v7-4G
 for 74523 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 10:19:47 -0500
Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2FA1B100154;
 Mon, 25 Nov 2024 10:19:39 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca;
 s=mail; t=1732547978;
 bh=s29zm+c9PLOPHe55FHoDPviNBFTn8reSI8msh0kt074=;
 h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From;
 b=ElCbnSvUtvv7lZUMp4O714gGbLSvM1FVFQfRDl98xT+Fo+HjwsG0Gk/f73xuOW609
 eaQeCQ1sY2E6r6cLAnqv5xQvXVmFxe/R+PETiXIHXnz1R2a3psWT5NvmmvjKedwqOc
 DVMqFskua6FbmzQ/TNbMPnTBYbkxgCRz1TCng1eTxyq1fCfXr8K94Gn3voJM9iIsff
 OMlE1dCLqrtAum0JbfOlfYmJUCsQPXW+yxG6fPVpXjnPQI6m07IqcBPnS+DthN+GRy
 DERf+5wVlkyHI/zQKteknmXsZGwEjvlX1tFMS6pFiealW6ou4pC2vfgVvr+vPU42GC
 5Q9XAj1pD+lGg==
Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1])
 by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8587C100035;
 Mon, 25 Nov 2024 10:19:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: from pastel (104-195-225-43.cpe.teksavvy.com [104.195.225.43])
 by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 62A6E12030F;
 Mon, 25 Nov 2024 10:19:38 -0500 (EST)
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <jwv34jfon6j.fsf-monnier+@gnu.org> (Stefan Monnier's message of
 "Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:19:43 -0500")
Message-ID: <jwvwmgrmjjf.fsf-monnier+emacs@HIDDEN>
References: <jwv34jfon6j.fsf-monnier+@gnu.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 10:19:36 -0500
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-SPAM-INFO: Spam detection results:  0
 ALL_TRUSTED                -1 Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 AWL -0.001 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DKIM_SIGNED               0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
 not necessarily valid
 DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
 DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
 domain
 DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from
 domain
X-SPAM-LEVEL: 
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

> We currently don't support `apply` undo-elements very well (if at all)
> in the undo-in-region feature.
> Those elements used to be rare, but now that `comment-region` and other
> users of `combine-change-calls` generate them, it's not as rare.

I pushed a patch which fixes the test I sent, but `apply` elements are
still never included in undo-in-region.

Fixing that won't be easy in general: we have no way for
`undo-adjust-elt` to handle them correctly.


        Stefan






Last modified: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 05:45:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.