GNU bug report logs -
#74570
[PATCH] gnu: xterm: Update to 395.
Previous Next
Reported by: kiasoc5 <kiasoc5 <at> disroot.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 05:20:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 74570 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 74570 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#74570; Package
guix-patches.
(Thu, 28 Nov 2024 05:20:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
kiasoc5 <kiasoc5 <at> disroot.org>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org.
(Thu, 28 Nov 2024 05:20:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
* gnu/packages/xorg.scm (xterm): Update to 395.
Change-Id: If8434c5d5055fa0a3163a7018b4c0ba5e5280935
---
gnu/packages/xorg.scm | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/xorg.scm b/gnu/packages/xorg.scm
index 554dc21ba7..470e8f1bc3 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/xorg.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/xorg.scm
@@ -5969,7 +5969,7 @@ (define-public xmessage
(define-public xterm
(package
(name "xterm")
- (version "390")
+ (version "395")
(source
(origin
(method url-fetch)
@@ -5979,7 +5979,7 @@ (define-public xterm
(string-append "ftp://ftp.invisible-island.net/xterm/"
"xterm-" version ".tgz")))
(sha256
- (base32 "03wwdwnpj5dg1ah5sfp00ppzawjd81lnw47g4p20jjhpqly7q4bm"))
+ (base32 "1j1x16c1789w845hgs49wsmgx7b2cwan49r8427f7siqb6m3qvi8"))
(patches
(search-patches "xterm-370-explicit-xcursor.patch"))))
(build-system gnu-build-system)
base-commit: c6d15cf27a137051ccd8f301330a70dd0eecc3d4
--
2.46.0
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#74570; Package
guix-patches.
(Fri, 29 Nov 2024 10:01:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
kiasoc5 via Guix-patches via <guix-patches <at> gnu.org> writes:
> * gnu/packages/xorg.scm (xterm): Update to 395.
>
> Change-Id: If8434c5d5055fa0a3163a7018b4c0ba5e5280935
> ---
> gnu/packages/xorg.scm | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/xorg.scm b/gnu/packages/xorg.scm
> index 554dc21ba7..470e8f1bc3 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/xorg.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/xorg.scm
> @@ -5969,7 +5969,7 @@ (define-public xmessage
> (define-public xterm
> (package
> (name "xterm")
> - (version "390")
> + (version "395")
> (source
> (origin
> (method url-fetch)
> @@ -5979,7 +5979,7 @@ (define-public xterm
> (string-append "ftp://ftp.invisible-island.net/xterm/"
> "xterm-" version ".tgz")))
> (sha256
> - (base32 "03wwdwnpj5dg1ah5sfp00ppzawjd81lnw47g4p20jjhpqly7q4bm"))
> + (base32 "1j1x16c1789w845hgs49wsmgx7b2cwan49r8427f7siqb6m3qvi8"))
> (patches
> (search-patches "xterm-370-explicit-xcursor.patch"))))
> (build-system gnu-build-system)
>
> base-commit: c6d15cf27a137051ccd8f301330a70dd0eecc3d4
Now the xvfb-run test depends on xterm, so we can't simply update xterm,
we might add a new xterm package and hide the original xterm for
xvfb-run only.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#74570; Package
guix-patches.
(Fri, 29 Nov 2024 10:01:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#74570; Package
guix-patches.
(Sat, 07 Dec 2024 14:19:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 74570 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Zheng,
Zheng Junjie <zhengjunjie <at> iscas.ac.cn> writes:
> kiasoc5 via Guix-patches via <guix-patches <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
>> * gnu/packages/xorg.scm (xterm): Update to 395.
>>
>> Change-Id: If8434c5d5055fa0a3163a7018b4c0ba5e5280935
>> ---
>> gnu/packages/xorg.scm | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/xorg.scm b/gnu/packages/xorg.scm
>> index 554dc21ba7..470e8f1bc3 100644
>> --- a/gnu/packages/xorg.scm
>> +++ b/gnu/packages/xorg.scm
>> @@ -5969,7 +5969,7 @@ (define-public xmessage
>> (define-public xterm
>> (package
>> (name "xterm")
>> - (version "390")
>> + (version "395")
>> (source
>> (origin
>> (method url-fetch)
>> @@ -5979,7 +5979,7 @@ (define-public xterm
>> (string-append "ftp://ftp.invisible-island.net/xterm/"
>> "xterm-" version ".tgz")))
>> (sha256
>> - (base32 "03wwdwnpj5dg1ah5sfp00ppzawjd81lnw47g4p20jjhpqly7q4bm"))
>> + (base32 "1j1x16c1789w845hgs49wsmgx7b2cwan49r8427f7siqb6m3qvi8"))
>> (patches
>> (search-patches "xterm-370-explicit-xcursor.patch"))))
>> (build-system gnu-build-system)
>>
>> base-commit: c6d15cf27a137051ccd8f301330a70dd0eecc3d4
>
> Now the xvfb-run test depends on xterm, so we can't simply update xterm,
> we might add a new xterm package and hide the original xterm for
> xvfb-run only.
Yes, we could rename the current 'xterm' variable to xterm/pinned, make
it hidden, then proceed to add a new 'xterm' package which inherits from
it, at its latest version.
--
Thanks,
Maxim
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#74570; Package
guix-patches.
(Sun, 08 Dec 2024 23:29:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 74570 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 12/7/24 09:17, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> Hi Zheng,
>
> Zheng Junjie <zhengjunjie <at> iscas.ac.cn> writes:
>
>> Now the xvfb-run test depends on xterm, so we can't simply update xterm,
>> we might add a new xterm package and hide the original xterm for
>> xvfb-run only.
>
> Yes, we could rename the current 'xterm' variable to xterm/pinned, make
> it hidden, then proceed to add a new 'xterm' package which inherits from
> it, at its latest version.
>
I agree with making a separate xterm package for tests. Since naming is
one of the hardest things in computer science, how about naming the
pinned version 'xterm-for-tests' instead?
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#74570; Package
guix-patches.
(Mon, 09 Dec 2024 00:45:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #20 received at 74570 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi,
kiasoc5 <kiasoc5 <at> disroot.org> writes:
> On 12/7/24 09:17, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>> Hi Zheng,
>> Zheng Junjie <zhengjunjie <at> iscas.ac.cn> writes:
>>
>>> Now the xvfb-run test depends on xterm, so we can't simply update xterm,
>>> we might add a new xterm package and hide the original xterm for
>>> xvfb-run only.
>> Yes, we could rename the current 'xterm' variable to xterm/pinned,
>> make
>> it hidden, then proceed to add a new 'xterm' package which inherits from
>> it, at its latest version.
>>
>
> I agree with making a separate xterm package for tests. Since naming
> is one of the hardest things in computer science, how about naming the
> pinned version 'xterm-for-tests' instead?
I don't have a strong preference, but note that in general I think
naming things based on what they *are*, rather than what they are *used*
for, is a better practice, as we can't reasonably foresee all future use
cases.
There is also a recent convention to use the '/pinned' suffix for
packages that shouldn't be updated often such as with our
git-minimal/pinned one [0]
[0] https://issues.guix.gnu.org/61078
--
Thanks,
Maxim
bug closed, send any further explanations to
74570 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and kiasoc5 <kiasoc5 <at> disroot.org>
Request was from
Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
(Sun, 26 Oct 2025 10:41:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
(Sun, 23 Nov 2025 12:24:07 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 7 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.