GNU bug report logs - #74856
Evaluation failed on ci.guix.gnu.org

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>

Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 18:43:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 74856 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 74856 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#74856; Package guix. (Fri, 13 Dec 2024 18:43:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix <at> gnu.org. (Fri, 13 Dec 2024 18:43:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Evaluation failed on ci.guix.gnu.org
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 13:41:47 -0500
A recent evaluation of the 'kernel-updates' job on ci.guix.gnu.org
failed:

https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/1903071

I was able to `guix time-machine` using the same commit, so the problem
may be more subtle (specific to Cuirass) or it may be a transient error.

I've pushed the master branch to 'kernel-updates' as a test.




Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#74856; Package guix. (Sat, 14 Dec 2024 19:54:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 74856 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: 74856 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: ludo <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: Evaluation failed on ci.guix.gnu.org
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2024 14:53:49 -0500
I'd guess that the evaluation failures of the 'kernel-updates' job is
related to the recent renaming of the manifests.

I see that maintenance.git has been updated accordingly.

But have the changes in maintenance.git been made effective on
ci.guix.gnu.org? Or do we still need to do that?




Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#74856; Package guix. (Tue, 17 Dec 2024 14:36:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #11 received at 74856 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Cc: 74856 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Evaluation failed on ci.guix.gnu.org
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 15:35:23 +0100
Hi,

Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name> skribis:

> I'd guess that the evaluation failures of the 'kernel-updates' job is
> related to the recent renaming of the manifests.
>
> I see that maintenance.git has been updated accordingly.
>
> But have the changes in maintenance.git been made effective on
> ci.guix.gnu.org? Or do we still need to do that?

Yes, there were issues.  Normally it should be fine now: I reconfigured
with the updated maintenance.git a couple of days ago.

Let me know if there are still problems!

Ludo’.




Reply sent to Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>:
You have taken responsibility. (Wed, 12 Mar 2025 02:14:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Wed, 12 Mar 2025 02:14:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #16 received at 74856-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: 74856-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Evaluation failed on ci.guix.gnu.org
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 22:13:37 -0400
It's been okay, so I'm closing this bug.




bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 09 Apr 2025 11:24:14 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 29 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.