Received: (at 75205) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jan 2025 13:20:55 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 06 08:20:55 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37276 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1tUn2N-0003ki-1d
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2025 08:20:55 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56330)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1tUn2K-0003kT-Qt
for 75205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2025 08:20:53 -0500
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
id 1tUn2F-0006Z4-2m; Mon, 06 Jan 2025 08:20:47 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To:
From; bh=hW0AhbgTSOs7z4u6cP9LTk4CZQzFOOFy/3YlnHcGa3U=; b=gRbYj0zwIj8y2D46aIr4
kUJrIkTt0jz421zDuyowwhxi8WcOX7WC4aqyEdsMAa/BWMcc4+Sq0YL2PkS0mpKYihQw6T3Hz1bAX
31lgjt0wvOu1XRHr7nQhuExwX8C5EQBqQ48mUZA/Wj/jVp7D3eHlf51ZZ4hCQ623i/d2Wkrp+YrAd
ERstBbxd3q6+gUibpYM+E5xg5p09G6KpzSVHTXl8NtjPyQrMjW0LiMmyCxBgl2PP3iFS95Y+AAu+M
2nuSDu1pDBmFB/WJfdSgMdp+nz40DraZMREz2xYERCHEBXzbr709IutO+JCx/UIGE+uZAhlOV7LH2
hNaoivJMq9a65Q==;
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
To: Ian Eure <ian@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#75205: guix package test failure on i686-linux
(kexec-load-file test)
In-Reply-To: <87v7uuphyg.fsf@HIDDEN> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?=
=?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Sat, 04 Jan 2025 19:11:35 +0100")
References: <87seq3uq0q.fsf@HIDDEN> <87v7uuphyg.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2025 14:20:42 +0100
Message-ID: <87wmf884et.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75205
Cc: 75205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)
See <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/75402>.
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#75205; Package guix.
Full text available.Ludovic Courtès <ludo@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
Full text available.Received: (at 75205) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jan 2025 09:08:34 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 06 04:08:34 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36625 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tUj69-0007ja-PW for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2025 04:08:34 -0500 Received: from mail.venatores.group ([2001:19f0:9002:2d20:5400:4ff:fe1f:ec4b]:60008) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <boogs@HIDDEN>) id 1tUTWu-0004IB-Jq for 75205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2025 11:31:09 -0500 From: boogs <boogs@HIDDEN> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=venatores.group; s=mail; t=1736094662; bh=N0VEWDGQy3w+MGz/jUCqAAvtaAiwF6jknF+xmMos8Oc=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=Vu1ZH7rAkvXfqp/JsonZJsUDnyXXQjmOK3x6ygV8ArI1c+iGNSnia86R6ACKlYdda FTI3DwuVH5VQ52LpEhi3KQ8kuOvVAyQ4o5TbGEgByN2oJ2o0bYSo+Lx+yEWlUqK3J3 ub99LISiac8ihseJxanVW77G9jrcyD2/8WkAEs6uOJ+91TAfZIV2QpvQLuCrESwQ2G qwekbGU4CqMuvJon/FdozcWiHHGLMC8TIzNf0CHmQFxWPKYAxR9dOchUoaHVQDLH2S H7BwqlhTTbNfZxXActa5pF26xYzpYFpX6lZCtzYrDmoB1ojLLyYtC15Q5ZNrnudYuz Ekemw5kcnNLlg== To: 75205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: guix package test failure on i686-linux (kexec-load-file test) Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2025 11:31:02 -0500 Message-ID: <87pll1kyt5.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75205 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 06 Jan 2025 04:08:32 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Forwarding my reply from this other relevant thread[1]: > Hi, > It looks like some people[1,2] including myself are running into an issue where the `guix system reconfigure` command fails, presumably because `KEXEC_FILE_DEBUG` is not supported in older kernel configurations. > > The output of reconfiguring my system is the same as Simen's[2] ending in: > > ``` > To complete the upgrade, run 'herd restart SERVICE' to stop, > upgrade, and restart each service that was not automatically restarted. > Run 'herd status' to view the list of services on your system. > WARNING: (guile-user): imported module (guix build utils) overrides core binding `delete' > guix system: error: kexec-load-file: Invalid argument > ``` > > My system runs a custom kernel configuration that I created via `make menuconfig` in the kernel repo. I suspect the issue lies here: > > ``` > (define (kexec-loading-program os) > "Return a program that calls 'kexec_file_load' to allow rebooting into OS > via 'kexec'." > (let ((root-device (file-system-device > (operating-system-root-file-system os)))) > (program-file > "kexec-load-system.scm" > (with-imported-modules '((guix build syscalls)) > #~(begin > (use-modules (guix build syscalls)) > (let ((kernel (open-fdes #$(operating-system-kernel-file os) > O_RDONLY)) > (initrd (open-fdes #$(operating-system-initrd-file os) > O_RDONLY))) > (kexec-load-file kernel initrd > (string-join > (list #$@(operating-system-kernel-arguments > os root-device))) > KEXEC_FILE_DEBUG))))))) > ``` > > This is the relevant snippet from my kernel configuration: > > ``` > # > # Kexec and crash features > # > CONFIG_CRASH_CORE=y > CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE=y > CONFIG_KEXEC=y > CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE=y > CONFIG_KEXEC_JUMP=y > CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP=y > CONFIG_CRASH_HOTPLUG=y > CONFIG_CRASH_MAX_MEMORY_RANGES=8192 > # end of Kexec and crash features > # end of General setup > ``` > > [1] https://issues.guix.gnu.org/75320 > [2] https://issues.guix.gnu.org/75211 [1] https://issues.guix.gnu.org/75027 -- Boogs
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#75205; Package guix.
Full text available.
Received: (at 75205) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jan 2025 18:11:57 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jan 04 13:11:57 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57247 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1tU8cu-0005No-SG
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 13:11:57 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39502)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1tU8cr-0005NW-QC
for 75205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 13:11:54 -0500
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
id 1tU8cm-0007Wx-5U; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 13:11:48 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To:
From; bh=sik+X1aJNkWQAG+oJGwfePlo1wlAzE4gcSTmNBnCmhk=; b=os8GK0s/i9hYIsWnZifT
G5tsiKGzKnj5FqxTPePFZNStJHpzQ7WlQ55L+Yo5Jh0Y29DLmUutYzyP6iYT1JjS2xVhDCO+eVri+
GQQezYULZfyp/1N1EDqfl9+s7GIgytGeCozWoHJOUNXhgX/e+EbxfHBREG03zPCyYWTIGV7UVRUu7
FrSci0aTAkTWcxCTZJSHPOLdmMXO7c3c2cHvmRLeFqhQ1w8kOjEKxUj1wUXm7kGr18c658iMHF/Wl
maNUjkFUEvZ0wn0q4tt0iEIpgrt6zqBmsPstFHK3myfsRiVxHBf3fIeX9XvDPk72xYcMNuZU2of1P
00kR9+80erJSug==;
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
To: Ian Eure <ian@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: guix package test failure on i686-linux (kexec-load-file test)
In-Reply-To: <87seq3uq0q.fsf@HIDDEN> (Ian Eure's message of "Tue, 31 Dec
2024 20:17:09 -0800")
References: <87seq3uq0q.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/
X-Revolutionary-Date: Quintidi 15 =?utf-8?Q?Niv=C3=B4se?= an 233 de la
=?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution=2C?= jour du Lapin
X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5
X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5
X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2025 19:11:35 +0100
Message-ID: <87v7uuphyg.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75205
Cc: 75205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)
Hello,
Ian Eure <ian@HIDDEN> skribis:
> This is failing for me on aarch64-linux also:
>
> test-name: kexec-load-file
> location:
> /tmp/guix-build-guix-1.4.0-31.121e96d.drv-0/source/tests/syscalls.scm:=
688
> source:
> + (test-equal
> + "kexec-load-file"
> + EPERM
> + (catch 'system-error
> + (lambda ()
> + (let ((fd1 (open-fdes "/dev/null" O_RDONLY))
> + (fd2 (open-fdes "/dev/null" O_RDONLY)))
> + (kexec-load-file fd1 fd2 "gnu.repl=3Dyes")))
> + (lambda args (system-error-errno args))))
> expected-value: 1
> actual-value: 38
> result: FAIL
Could you strace it, to see if strace decodes it are =E2=80=98kexec_file_lo=
ad=E2=80=99?
For example like this:
./pre-inst-env strace -e kexec_file_load \
guile -c '(use-modules (guix build syscalls)) (kexec-load-file (open-fd=
es "/dev/null" O_RDONLY) (open-fdes "/dev/null" O_RDONLY) "")'
38 is ENOSYS (=E2=80=9CFunction not implemented=E2=80=9D), not ERANGE. Thi=
s could mean
that kexec support is missing in this kernel.
Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#75205; Package guix.
Full text available.
Received: (at 75205) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jan 2025 04:17:21 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 31 23:17:21 2024
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37374 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1tSqAa-000414-MP
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Dec 2024 23:17:20 -0500
Received: from fhigh-a3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([103.168.172.154]:53603)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <ian@HIDDEN>) id 1tSqAY-00040q-1A
for 75205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Dec 2024 23:17:18 -0500
Received: from phl-compute-09.internal (phl-compute-09.phl.internal
[10.202.2.49])
by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB8451140157;
Tue, 31 Dec 2024 23:17:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: from phl-mailfrontend-02 ([10.202.2.163])
by phl-compute-09.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 31 Dec 2024 23:17:12 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=retrospec.tv; h=
cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date
:date:from:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:reply-to
:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1735705032; x=1735791432; bh=uN
+nPcllXViu4nmWIVu3ouLoVvKIgos0hhBtB1locQk=; b=2K9CWQzpue+MRYAP81
kAV1JV1RChHC1m9AwIR9aPpuwv659iQEezzYppU58L6MmMHyCnUb/BySxR0sq0Q/
/G9hKLhS6qsW0sV1J21sP8Uz6Q+CL4aHs0aug7DRzmf5Yhzmfh+7QesuQgQcepRU
pXbCWaWvgcW9+c+iitajKSoLCc9HwL7W2YCBrYJb5tFkPu/qxMzgnXA/p3qh3g4G
J/NmIa0/9qTu+NLA5MP8R18X3p0CEk2Lpfdkey3wG0XpKtVdytFHfA8Ob+R46a+G
7JikF35B3GHagL7s+I6jk2TFBx72gK4P4rV17+eGFaSZodEoJYbUWasLBTzHJ5n/
AdAQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding
:content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id
:from:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:reply-to:subject
:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=
fm2; t=1735705032; x=1735791432; bh=uN+nPcllXViu4nmWIVu3ouLoVvKI
gos0hhBtB1locQk=; b=wDy0vaaZ8cz19RLvAfk/Ae9LK+67nGqo8wl644RwSns7
ywhHf7fC2uF9WhRZB7O5+GIUJFHOIRf2IMrixYsv7DS7+FsfVtk1xoVnClOsOTw7
/O+RMH6XUmM7AhugAnDm0JlcFG6CVwZvzVtH+0JhYD3nQNFd+UykMUS6UCJ+BmPm
guiiDn1OhMWDPyx3lmKSOBEfGFFlP78xZe+4mZkVJHkBwcQBvX/H9rkd4ETa3tdU
BOF8VntztvXe/87Cdmb31gBRyAXihzn5+fQnOs2WN5ZvM9AWWKgf7/YzJSFnWdzC
jUPNUvJwBrJiitGINnw5b2TzMaLcvfCs7CSd1MgItQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:yMF0Z6oqEJ8-W-jH-Ir8HdpSA7TeOTGWMRoCBcOeXqZLKzn3XJbS3g>
<xme:yMF0Z4oC5Ugz75dqaN3Rs2JfPBlLMnKvR39Xa0ZirJxQLrCrs3tJMPMo0DWVT1sQP
8JklojdGYyKyr6hVg>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:yMF0Z_NoYsSXvtULkf1w20WSz4c6CzS3HFarO3dvrRyahwZq9iwbGKrkOgPqPNR0XWchyVd4dr6Ij8AUt-D_6_mWM2zljqWlj08_q5g>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefuddruddvledgjedtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf
fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfu
rfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnh
htshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhephffvvefufgffkfggtgfgsehtqhertddtreejnecu
hfhrohhmpefkrghnucfguhhrvgcuoehirghnsehrvghtrhhoshhpvggtrdhtvheqnecugg
ftrfgrthhtvghrnheptdetkeffffefiefhueekvdeiueegieegffdthfelveelgfdtvdfh
tdduheffuedvnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrh
homhepihgrnhesrhgvthhrohhsphgvtgdrthhvpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedvpdhmohgu
vgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehluhguohesghhnuhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtth
hopeejhedvtdehseguvggssghughhsrdhgnhhurdhorhhg
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:yMF0Z55tGMf5SBOFYxV5vQjNmVNFZBhab9RibglHVMAod3n-TPNPKg>
<xmx:yMF0Z55kzgUtRq1DKPWf9N7nQW9MvNYBpL-kFGnFlLfI2a3wVYjSCg>
<xmx:yMF0Z5hn1S0eYU8aJzN1egwHWTR3DxCBzcpjpidh6Fa_UG8QViAfhA>
<xmx:yMF0Zz49rQHVJhEKXEjez3d0zWRDqVPgxNZuHFbY2_jXnnplVriTXA>
<xmx:yMF0Z5EnulmtsEaVLgT8f3460CBVFMIPjoaAW5J7Fxsjsm2eoDMqaH-P>
Feedback-ID: id9014242:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue,
31 Dec 2024 23:17:12 -0500 (EST)
From: Ian Eure <ian@HIDDEN>
To: 75205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: guix package test failure on i686-linux (kexec-load-file test)
User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.7; emacs 29.4
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2024 20:17:09 -0800
Message-ID: <87seq3uq0q.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75205
Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)
This is failing for me on aarch64-linux also:
test-name: kexec-load-file
location:=20
/tmp/guix-build-guix-1.4.0-31.121e96d.drv-0/source/tests/syscalls.scm:6=
88
source:
+ (test-equal
+ "kexec-load-file"
+ EPERM
+ (catch 'system-error
+ (lambda ()
+ (let ((fd1 (open-fdes "/dev/null" O_RDONLY))
+ (fd2 (open-fdes "/dev/null" O_RDONLY)))
+ (kexec-load-file fd1 fd2 "gnu.repl=3Dyes")))
+ (lambda args (system-error-errno args))))
expected-value: 1
actual-value: 38
result: FAIL
If I downgrade to commit 96cd163c14e68c66c6a4cf0b18261fc454f8c1ba,=20
guix tests pass again -- the failing test was added in the next=20
commit. I=E2=80=99m not sure what the issue here, it seems like that=20
syscall shouldn=E2=80=99t be arch-dependent, and the errnos in the=20
failures are unhelpful. 38 is ERANGE, 14 is EFAULT, neither of=20
those seem applicable here. EPERM is 1, and 38 doesn=E2=80=99t have its=20
LSB set, so it can=E2=80=99t be a bitmask.
I=E2=80=99m encountering the issue using Guix as a foreign package manager=
=20
on top of Debian 12 "bookworm" in a VM. Perhaps there=E2=80=99s an=20
implicit dependency on the host system=E2=80=99s kernel in the test, which=
=20
Debian=E2=80=99s fails to meet.
Ludo=E2=80=99, any thoughts?
-- Ian
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#75205; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Dec 2024 16:55:34 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Dec 30 11:55:34 2024 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59653 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tSJ3G-0003r6-Fb for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 11:55:34 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:42464) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <dariqq@HIDDEN>) id 1tSJ3E-0003qy-GH for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 11:55:33 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <dariqq@HIDDEN>) id 1tSJ3D-0005o0-Io for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 11:55:32 -0500 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <dariqq@HIDDEN>) id 1tSJ3B-0001wR-T6 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 11:55:31 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41EB5240027 for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 17:55:25 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1735577726; bh=FDFv+lcHRtqv/35nRYGQ4z+y/79G1WOrPHZ/ZMYWUlU=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:From:Subject:To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:From; b=PpNlZpkGnO4Vy5qoje0wKUfbTy1Y7P9JwogcQXS3QddnjTz1sApRwIDwDNGI04TtO NAUN4ddTOH/JvMAzPf0dcLMlOs3WIEAW8H4JmDlf2xGZhx16nzhXbZzfCmaWuSQv5B ijtse1Y+OQs5IA9s+ZecnXObCLaN92PweprGAXvpb0zQBsyPEE/+nNKy3x+hsmlAyG Y1K2EcgbaEYmRswAomuq9wl0he0f3ACfk/j4xeZVq3sJMerpqSM7Z6GasrGMQStpXF gkYabcTwWQcVzyOoW9Ap8HnjiT4HlcOGF+w0qpUC9arC9MREiQy+QSfqrfSmDT6psB iEGNSYdlFN8EA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4YMMfj2QJXz9rxF for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 17:55:25 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <781419f2-6304-4c18-b01c-412121126ee5@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 16:55:17 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Dariqq <dariqq@HIDDEN> Subject: guix package test failure on i686-linux (kexec-load-file test) Content-Language: en-US To: bug-guix@HIDDEN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=dariqq@HIDDEN; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Hello, The guix package is failing the newly added kexec-load-file syscall test on i686-linux: From https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/7774049/details: test-name: kexec-load-file location: /tmp/guix-build-guix-1.4.0-31.121e96d.drv-0/source/tests/syscalls.scm:688 source: + (test-equal + "kexec-load-file" + EPERM + (catch 'system-error + (lambda () + (let ((fd1 (open-fdes "/dev/null" O_RDONLY)) + (fd2 (open-fdes "/dev/null" O_RDONLY))) + (kexec-load-file fd1 fd2 "gnu.repl=yes"))) + (lambda args (system-error-errno args)))) expected-value: 1 actual-value: 14 result: FAIL
Dariqq <dariqq@HIDDEN>:bug-guix@HIDDEN.
Full text available.bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#75205; Package guix.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.