GNU bug report logs - #75510
Building grub-image.png.drv fails with rsvg

Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.

Package: guix; Reported by: Roman Scherer <roman.scherer@HIDDEN>; dated Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:00:02 UTC; Maintainer for guix is bug-guix@HIDDEN.

Message received at 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 75510) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jan 2025 22:00:41 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 24 17:00:41 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47302 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1tbRjF-0002yj-0h
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jan 2025 17:00:41 -0500
Received: from mail-ej1-x631.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::631]:50683)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <roman.scherer@HIDDEN>)
 id 1tbRjC-0002yR-A4
 for 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jan 2025 17:00:38 -0500
Received: by mail-ej1-x631.google.com with SMTP id
 a640c23a62f3a-aaec61d0f65so568950766b.1
 for <75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 24 Jan 2025 14:00:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=burningswell-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1737756031;
 x=1738360831; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; 
 h=mime-version:message-id:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to
 :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=/3gct2ITZ6dxKZ84BNME6fD6CLD+0LfgpTML8epsOEQ=;
 b=Fr5JkrjqQs1ue7/lplEDSFe9XoyPqt7TPDPiGJ0jZF34uTJBUbVVYm+Q8QWynq2Wae
 X4a+MQ9QdPSXfBvqEHkeDC7o9gVj3YI2FF9AWwiuZicOO1ADch+zsjbNGKutLb7hb83g
 9LRmWmY86ZKCJ6dO5XQtcL95GDd15a/vhnUqgh5doZSE+OGOOAPlVn3owfeUPRPpvQFf
 wd5vosVHf/aPl8fKiyqsd+PXp8lgqvvVEf8Kxx6bNh0QYSpMs/l1j+pST7Eggj8LKViD
 2TlF+cOUo19xCiVor+kRl8ImautFH6JECmJfx/6oO0U62ba1VrCfUCQT0q164MZs7OlS
 MgrA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1737756031; x=1738360831;
 h=mime-version:message-id:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to
 :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date
 :message-id:reply-to;
 bh=/3gct2ITZ6dxKZ84BNME6fD6CLD+0LfgpTML8epsOEQ=;
 b=ugGqcKxHwuEnztvUSCjrG3DDZTIT+PgUG6tyiSBKDNHg2OzxDjiXlGVjLPjVK/SZIc
 VHkwOxFJEqWeoKQtvUdD7HQt2ONEv8CE7D644eiQR7bWZCNk2feYnqMPvsL0XrIx40af
 7PFZUDGPAZoyQb4Qd/M/UfanFqYBv5jgN7m+HYOOh2EoCFGbqa4AwxGR9Ss6S8HdZDdc
 9kkv3PQ3YAFHGKm8BJsIMi3O18vY2hQInzeG1u29aRpJnO9xTaMXY+D0FKa8HikVCbBE
 38rzzPPBIx/X1Shu5k6M5k4HJaxFkMixtsg3TdxdVHFr+8H9t1sSsF4hImnCqRPCmSXq
 jNgA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwuFiKxg2llQMfQlaHdGMet9mLypBseZ832rP8BiHsfgTHUPT33
 PZCjKTAErljIWL62h0h/ryrWnAMh3XA6w9MrTKilmLWnArT2dgc4Gx2tTie6SAUUz9VS+7F7gYB
 wduQ=
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctvSFYBTK9GlvYya2C0j8JZ+c1OyCO3OgywyKV7YEPqVHktSDQ426I3qBbVjoO
 TaFppCA/qDmeZlQZVdWdYVVrawN06+VIVPOqX6OTbmwpdc0dpbWJahXO2TUuKmgG3jv24dDXLRh
 Ulm3sJrPXAMJmkpMVWyAYMVDmMkbTuXvE+pEuAOYcYWEpNzlCjldG45DoHXZlSjhb8CtB52OAwV
 uxvMo0tdk2wlkWo8ysg+hOTKYGWEIgqvss5LGNcohwbfRa8mOx9P2eiUJBE4+znJge7blkxVtv4
 8z8X3cOH
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFv16nyWUhU+UomvLcZLWQPncm/1VO+//jaHE5euiCHcmdOzjNChbyzgmeq9fbZCqkGejOLZQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:1c26:b0:aab:9361:f8f8 with SMTP id
 a640c23a62f3a-ab38b3cdfa1mr2922142966b.50.1737756031144; 
 Fri, 24 Jan 2025 14:00:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from m1 ([2a01:599:11f:daca:25d1:a6d0:c374:4ebd])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 a640c23a62f3a-ab6760fbeb4sm185754766b.133.2025.01.24.14.00.30
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Fri, 24 Jan 2025 14:00:30 -0800 (PST)
From: Roman Scherer <roman.scherer@HIDDEN>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#75510: Building grub-image.png.drv fails with rsvg
In-Reply-To: <Z5QNDAdJnPyuUS0p@HIDDEN> (Leo Famulari's message of "Fri,
 24 Jan 2025 16:58:36 -0500")
References: <86bjwcs68x.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z49oywSPyExSDssV@lambda>
 <86v7u8uz7v.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z5AzOQu6Pv0k0We6@lambda>
 <Z5NSPJWIbktkIXlq@3900XT> <86zfjg359l.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <Z5QNDAdJnPyuUS0p@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.7; emacs 29.4
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 23:00:28 +0100
Message-ID: <86cygboosj.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75510
Cc: 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain


Alright, thank you Leo!

Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> writes:

> On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 10:55:34AM +0100, Roman Scherer wrote:
>> I'm not very familiar with grafts and have a question. When no grafts
>> are used for building the Grub image, does it mean it uses packages with
>> no security updates applied, or is it just that the grafts are not used
>> and the packages are built from scratch using the latest security
>> updates?
>
> If you use '--no-grafts', then you will not receive the security
> updates.

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQFTBAEBCAA9FiEE0iajOdjfRIFd3gygPdpSUn0qwZkFAmeUDXwfHHJvbWFuLnNj
aGVyZXJAYnVybmluZ3N3ZWxsLmNvbQAKCRA92lJSfSrBmSfZB/9jOfqjhlAjCMAl
ae3ewbGVrCQ7BVvga54/uyWxXf9HMclAHtMIhyleEoXTgRY2ld45KbY07VRQx7j7
F0dHMst3/h0uaHt7qiPBrxxA6nI1LDkaMW5Qcm9DzoTpqHcdUdrobLsdcVYInnpA
E7UE4ikEhL3yqNv4gI6n5+0zXEzqYmMX+DZ3lz9C3RIKuRPwnxcxc/QgfbXgur7w
4hvg/SNVxRqHvweji+h8bTTf1xbCDkjhd+LJawuBInTEQtY1biN7lRGQ1+Ro/csz
X6ndXuvYGSZjf36iShE+zmqbm60Lcu22bCpeShHvOfsDIpRumQIQi1TwPb2acYgD
utVfw160
=cO0C
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#75510; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 75510) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jan 2025 21:58:48 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 24 16:58:48 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47289 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1tbRhP-0002nX-Rm
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jan 2025 16:58:48 -0500
Received: from fout-b2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([202.12.124.145]:39901)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1tbRhM-0002nG-Rp
 for 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jan 2025 16:58:45 -0500
Received: from phl-compute-01.internal (phl-compute-01.phl.internal
 [10.202.2.41])
 by mailfout.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AAF711400AC;
 Fri, 24 Jan 2025 16:58:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: from phl-mailfrontend-02 ([10.202.2.163])
 by phl-compute-01.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 24 Jan 2025 16:58:39 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name;
 h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from
 :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
 :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=mesmtp; t=1737755919; x=
 1737842319; bh=/5+6UNch44zgGRIOWnXhlrSbsDiir6zG7QAjGqCcyks=; b=S
 eoeAQ/+xXQtG9KMcV5hMjYkY2s8p7OML1KV5EmPsDnHuFlXUSKpbAKThU5jgugkv
 sUthQCuF6cYi/kZgdPPu4qzp962t2R2hhKCJK7cjMeN5wKihHMld59GCIF1X6AYC
 2/sQ641GVUTWcabrazG0iL0y7ZHJ838RZq71Zshhns=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date
 :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to
 :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to
 :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=
 1737755919; x=1737842319; bh=/5+6UNch44zgGRIOWnXhlrSbsDiir6zG7QA
 jGqCcyks=; b=LkdvA0PCl6jpXw9khrQwVAKsJBfXYSultnoH51P7z4iv+H979Kp
 XKdQxF8nnJP5+X+v83mEK3nWfAtZKgiopNpgvIz1Yc+AEcpmfkBkey1IPGWP1U34
 lqg4ZBa8ul6de43WJqg2tHZ6aZZ2dCBLd/fqdR9cpqgOdJeLE943UKb/fO6IokG3
 dZXzNwSDwEaWV7RV96A5OEKcLB3vXUjUmcYyrUlMrF+9fZbLYoilhiRFyeosbEkV
 l5UpZb2E+/1ad4AL4ROMHJ3aDlUrpWqwWyjVcbVbFCQTzjrsT9jrpWfQ15aGlS+9
 lt+TFl7wR7JeqYkfDnS/1JMUYXlmcwaKWLg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:Dg2UZ1o7m1d5coYAsVgbvJeYcbtfBSQ_gdqadkXPU-buq1kRzbUFfQ>
 <xme:Dg2UZ3o9Wc-A4l-IBW7uEA6rcgbHBF_NYfA-yxsjQKMMdg4L8LAFmPpVwWb_pa2uF
 zpvsk4ks3hzv3UNMA>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:Dg2UZyMhE-a08OQZqUgfinyNc0n85HP6xx_8uouk7_hGFFm7HAPksYx-u0_rvp-8xCLQ36VtB8HCrHV6Eo58UCWv>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefuddrudejgedgheeihecutefuodetggdotefrod
 ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdp
 uffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivg
 hnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvvefukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertddttddv
 necuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnh
 grmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeiteduheefkeeufeelgeduhfejgfelheefleeu
 hfeffffgueduleehvdejleeiteenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmh
 epmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvpdhnsggprhgtphht
 thhopeegpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehrohhmrghnrdhstghhvg
 hrvghrsegsuhhrnhhinhhgshifvghllhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopegvfhhrrghimhes
 fhhlrghshhhnvghrrdgtohdrihhlpdhrtghpthhtohepghhuihigsehikhhhvghrsggvrh
 hsrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepjeehhedutdesuggvsggsuhhgshdrghhnuhdrohhrgh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:Dg2UZw76EVHRQ13mvGLOoVLxx5OkV4B5pV2sttoDFNqbaKkuICrAsg>
 <xmx:Dg2UZ07Qe5AK04G8Xni5KzUl-GflTXdYjADzBtZpKlVU-twgL8ng4A>
 <xmx:Dg2UZ4hhrO7DV66VG7Z_FUU4sN-0RGAMcscpCcIQ4GpoA8SE7LQ8Ug>
 <xmx:Dg2UZ25IA8u3lx3z4v8gtwCGVJpdn8CXaamkiNsGxZtwwA-sfM-pvA>
 <xmx:Dg2UZ_02QFRcDsLVN3EgWmOe6ECNWnD8xxuM7usMhIh8_PR6eS4t9czs>
Feedback-ID: i819c4023:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri,
 24 Jan 2025 16:58:38 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 16:58:36 -0500
From: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
To: Roman Scherer <roman.scherer@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#75510: Building grub-image.png.drv fails with rsvg
Message-ID: <Z5QNDAdJnPyuUS0p@HIDDEN>
References: <86bjwcs68x.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z49oywSPyExSDssV@lambda>
 <86v7u8uz7v.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z5AzOQu6Pv0k0We6@lambda>
 <Z5NSPJWIbktkIXlq@3900XT> <86zfjg359l.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <86zfjg359l.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75510
Cc: vicvbcun <guix@HIDDEN>, Efraim Flashner <efraim@HIDDEN>,
 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)

On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 10:55:34AM +0100, Roman Scherer wrote:
> I'm not very familiar with grafts and have a question. When no grafts
> are used for building the Grub image, does it mean it uses packages with
> no security updates applied, or is it just that the grafts are not used
> and the packages are built from scratch using the latest security
> updates?

If you use '--no-grafts', then you will not receive the security
updates.




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#75510; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 75510) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jan 2025 09:55:48 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 24 04:55:48 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43722 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1tbGPj-000109-LE
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jan 2025 04:55:48 -0500
Received: from mail-ej1-x635.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::635]:54719)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <roman.scherer@HIDDEN>)
 id 1tbGPf-0000zs-Jd
 for 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jan 2025 04:55:46 -0500
Received: by mail-ej1-x635.google.com with SMTP id
 a640c23a62f3a-aa6a92f863cso400262266b.1
 for <75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 24 Jan 2025 01:55:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=burningswell-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1737712537;
 x=1738317337; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; 
 h=mime-version:message-id:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to
 :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=reQD5Vg9bVVanT4WU9Hzd+oOy6kkA6BSXeTOfIWeGAc=;
 b=MZMuCW1gTTNLZ/crD0atOx/jp6ZZBXEymQQJO/1AUAcFq8atkMik8pRIrjkCjwXH2J
 uXg6CoU8YEflZhxMJCxDlqVI8P0AXShcBGqSJf1CuYe5/HWz17u9uEG5cpnNQP6z8zpE
 4ngmWscILYRxrWS7mgvLM8llawyWvaDxBZ7d+ucSzsN6mfzxqvnkfa/xyh71aO7+ZUrJ
 ImwwGRrL8b3MonMTweRcJRFIp4TlC17L7uLZ+EufOaRqJ1oLpf22cpffYUdEU7K/AU7g
 iKOoWnNLJ1jcoHtcnf2QA3VWwi6JP93OQ1z+s+jp1wrpdLO/j2YaXiLzaoA3Ra3kQFm4
 9StQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1737712537; x=1738317337;
 h=mime-version:message-id:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to
 :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date
 :message-id:reply-to;
 bh=reQD5Vg9bVVanT4WU9Hzd+oOy6kkA6BSXeTOfIWeGAc=;
 b=Ncn8WkF/HVxuxGE86p3deJ4aZEYltZ6hkYbRYjecW8/e37A9Nhi3e2asTqtODa24UR
 96DtAVry1u7HSJfIhB4/SXjXKYz3RrVjAx6g4PXDEFMEVrh86KQf8mg2LIOdiJCm5HfR
 YNjMzbdIJXcvjWMgY9n36ROAyQUyDwMwWgHoIVJ9UUlBEutE1CZr4hIHARgCWh5qnZ+c
 E57M2wAQKJUc84fEnNVzRZXNISF5yuEeWuu68cFk7Hy48uugBMz4ihQOD30TNPSudRZP
 bMlNLSfnYinB8lU9QsTf04BP7oyeKDWrOKPu56TPc60tj4wPJj1MNmcS9xaRt0QzCpFu
 1feg==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1;
 AJvYcCUtYoZfo3sgiVzt4cQBG0nLy7mx/+S4+nRXjlbzkSbrDlYcejcH4ia6MXpNiBGnbBImH05CsA==@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxxSH3CfnijN6pudnTyALSpOh8qlG6S5pikRoaYRfqMQO8V5WFZ
 om7ZrH0rv19+JbZO3j6abHqmnmd8Igth5/sl1dtn87WulvmJy+eI95sV9D+blw9F6SEfowJwwsz
 jIb8=
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsmD7b4fGP6fZHcka11pUyNqPYMWhAlVGsZCeWk3+hEBocULCLCpZ8dRpJHggj
 otVcTBQelxGu9NXfMunYcRuYiRByy60vc0HxwtOzhFr4llFBqLyO4XYrQzUJAjixL9AjSKxU/Sa
 piwzEuknA/ihu27e9JItSY4KxAeKN0D6UoINBAZWcytuXHLm+grXBDyyre5+RWRsWAcT33Q/TbP
 kk/s8Cr+BlbqZWqy1KjvSEYOMoUnhcBnNaorjeUfMHVY3m5HdlLm67xFEt6QBUOiNK2msNpUH9T
 dwBBox7K
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEs03IgKsqZ+WyPttglg+91faJOONSv67D3BMnAIR0DpTrj8YxtBOZ78NpGZQK1mCREWQLXFg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:f6cd:b0:ab6:3704:5f0b with SMTP id
 a640c23a62f3a-ab637046235mr1377054866b.10.1737712537274; 
 Fri, 24 Jan 2025 01:55:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from m1 ([2a01:599:11f:daca:25d1:a6d0:c374:4ebd])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 a640c23a62f3a-ab675e8b02dsm99338866b.85.2025.01.24.01.55.36
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Fri, 24 Jan 2025 01:55:36 -0800 (PST)
From: Roman Scherer <roman.scherer@HIDDEN>
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#75510: Building grub-image.png.drv fails with rsvg
In-Reply-To: <Z5NSPJWIbktkIXlq@3900XT> (Efraim Flashner's message of "Fri, 24
 Jan 2025 10:41:32 +0200")
References: <86bjwcs68x.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z49oywSPyExSDssV@lambda>
 <86v7u8uz7v.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z5AzOQu6Pv0k0We6@lambda>
 <Z5NSPJWIbktkIXlq@3900XT>
User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.7; emacs 29.4
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 10:55:34 +0100
Message-ID: <86zfjg359l.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75510
Cc: vicvbcun <guix@HIDDEN>, 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Hi Efraim,

thanks for looking into this! Much appreciated. I just tried your patch
and reconfigured my system as usual without using --no-grafts and I can
confirm that it is working again.

I'm not very familiar with grafts and have a question. When no grafts
are used for building the Grub image, does it mean it uses packages with
no security updates applied, or is it just that the grafts are not used
and the packages are built from scratch using the latest security
updates?

Thanks, Roman.

Efraim Flashner <efraim@HIDDEN> writes:

> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 12:52:25AM +0100, vicvbcun wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> below are my current findings.
>>
>> As of commit
>>     87045f0982 (gnu: paritwine: Update to 0.2.1., 2025-01-17)
>> guile-rsvg depends on a version of guile-cairo different from the one I =
get
>> by simply building guile-cairo:
>>
>>     $ ./pre-inst-env guix build guile-cairo
>>     =E2=87=92 /gnu/store/k4kglplg98098y78flnw0f9wjyyc9zk2-guile-cairo-1.=
11.2
>>
>> whereas
>>
>>     $ guix gc --references "$(./pre-inst-env guix build guile-rsvg)" | g=
rep guile-cairo
>>     =E2=87=92 /gnu/store/lz8cv73yzzrbwrhafzadixnwgmspz2cg-guile-cairo-1.=
11.2
>>
>> (gnu build svg) loads both (rsvg) and (cairo) which causes two different
>> libguile-cairo.so's to be loaded (interestingly enough the order matters:
>> loading (cairo) first would hide the issue):
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>> ./pre-inst-env guix shell --no-cwd -C guile guile-cairo guile-rsvg -- \
>>     guile -s /dev/stdin <<EOF | grep libguile-cairo
>>
>> (begin
>>  (use-modules (ice-9 textual-ports)
>>               ;; order matters!
>>               (rsvg)
>> 	            (cairo))
>>
>> (display (call-with-input-file "/proc/self/maps" get-string-all)))
>> EOF
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>> shows two different libguile-cairo.so's.  The only difference between the
>> two guile-cairo derivation is that they graft cairo to different
>> derivations, which in turn differ only in grafting fontconfig-minimal to
>> different versions which finally only graft glibc and expat in different
>> order.
>>
>> All this confirms the hypothesis Mark expressed in [0].
>>
>> My guess is that the change to rust-ring somehow changes how it interacts
>> with grafting.  Perhaps it is added / not added to some hashtable, causi=
ng
>> iteration order to change?
>>
>> 0: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/47115#23
>
> I tried setting rust-ring's sources to #:target #f but that didn't make
> any difference.  I feel like it shouldn't make a difference, and should
> probably be #:target #f anyway, but that can be a different time.
>
> I'm attaching a patch that creates the grub image using ungrafted
> inputs.  I think it would make sense to go through and figure out which
> derivations actually need to use grafted inputs and which ones don't
> matter, but I'm not sure it's worth the maintenance burden to check them
> regularly.
>
> The image also seems like something that could be #:target #f and we
> could cheat by getting a generated image built on a different
> architecture, but that's never seemed to work that way, only for
> cross-building.

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQFTBAEBCAA9FiEE0iajOdjfRIFd3gygPdpSUn0qwZkFAmeTY5YfHHJvbWFuLnNj
aGVyZXJAYnVybmluZ3N3ZWxsLmNvbQAKCRA92lJSfSrBmU+6CADMNRUDCVLoGzZu
6vqeLFd9oC8u9SSQ0xHAhUqrrz/2W5yadUa8/vRSSFV3YVhIB7mgE6/5R074qOlB
GZpGvkAVuZLDnDEUOHEfUfvhjvRl7D03TAIQzAbe4/Ypc0iVBFxT8m70mMZVsD2O
8UULWpNdaDxwIeRpcWL+SDtqNrvDSVBU9ISiX74PvwQjh3k2AW0e7iYF0gIFtEmP
DZ6p+F+LNX9YQjicrGGCD/p+fbaR9LeF1NR3nqd43NAIgepsnPfzOCzVzoY7GA1o
H45tIo+sF7hZhx2RA2Ot4efJF+7pV63SDNInCsXA37l3eT6I83txtAj4CJBDCQjE
D6vyi0m0
=42TS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#75510; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 75510) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jan 2025 08:41:54 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 24 03:41:54 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43563 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1tbFGD-00030O-EF
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jan 2025 03:41:54 -0500
Received: from mail-wr1-x42b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42b]:52338)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <efraim.flashner@HIDDEN>)
 id 1tbFG8-000307-1N
 for 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jan 2025 03:41:51 -0500
Received: by mail-wr1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id
 ffacd0b85a97d-3862ca8e0bbso1660434f8f.0
 for <75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 24 Jan 2025 00:41:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1737708102; x=1738312902; darn=debbugs.gnu.org;
 h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references
 :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:to:from:date:sender:from:to:cc
 :subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=rougMtfRTTo6cH3Bb4UMtzfmYrXo376Zrj4std4oclg=;
 b=eRTsV3Uu6blqLdL/d0toWCxGynK2FvzNYYUrEvw+F/qNEGK0ldezv0+v8VIUCavgQk
 LO7T+XQuS6DgiMQECoypoOXiZMYatq74TnVl+SlsL/htBlXc7bFfE9ChTCQPlhzNAZah
 9Frfxjg+IUr9CXbXuaRh6eF9PLO9OVvlbdvmUUypmroG0qhu1LBPwiKTBCvh0NRralmS
 x38gfd6fRsYFQ4dqzmFvIc6oHKy57RyE3lUB5ZGAL5o4W2gxE+d5u36nGIGIBuIwb8FE
 ThsyyGIkls1IVCrVz/45GKcRa2IJFTqCT+TXeuMsNB6EeHcAjZAn0K81o93hfIE4kNRu
 Ljjw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1737708102; x=1738312902;
 h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references
 :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:to:from:date:sender
 :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=rougMtfRTTo6cH3Bb4UMtzfmYrXo376Zrj4std4oclg=;
 b=ICivUIkFpImW3V/JLOIsJlGAwjPLMtyAosWNbMCLHmBj+ht3vjsTJEIqwA2+6QkmEF
 6XaBV4wwEHnEKedVQz+sNmp8I3ACcofESmv4TzbKbZOd83Q7Zrjm74wLrbXtYK1vEaJm
 /aCVJJZXRiX9E1zHe/lbio3ZQFmh9BxA3pCuhxmo84S7QRfdVhzBSeErS/+i075ij4M3
 pHCXL+r5SCH+Lg4pcJNqUdAUqrYXXz8poHNH+17H2mluRnyII1ibKfq+BykggnmGtpUV
 Y4EzKI0njhHaCQJGYrjUQH3lL/Hw0MHeggTmi0tRYNJFwwybUk0Xfz2unIDE+veu7zs0
 HzRw==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1;
 AJvYcCX19jzGH4IV+3ssD2b6ALO0APZXiCv8k+ATf2l8BDlqEU0TiWysgC3etQyZZl6H4sW2iJe5lw==@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzEVKZpM4tidRHmpD/gOVC/hQp8tU3zAJRVnzSGa1Dz37mL/KIO
 COml8OSdj34h3ODRgZs7C9hs6/1rpi7jqQ2aJKWu4FR6sQMvUSshK0ovBWOZ
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvnVXkiZiXVRFolj3KG3fjLkBATTnYtVoZyh/9TLIPHnHVCGeIzqI10ZZD023l
 J97Wac1/S0Yt63HfnCky0TeBqOURFmG0mvXodM1pYalNbjBnWJKiy8EZB/OLqBMJbVjVDme1Awd
 iwrveNmg96vjsGY8YS1ORq/IoRbEd7HL4eSsOFThydtkMwCtGJNV7wYK1xxgrenGrzjGZ053fnx
 A2/R5+u3eD3FrgM+vLlfroIoi9zDmbjOqVO48LDTYmIfGDwzcRYnu/Ya0NgXgbyibg3lvQAsASJ
 H5yg
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHWIsDYZBbnoSeEPZXOYqiDp/ur0yxMW/Th2oz6DyVufaAX15FEcrg1DtKaHYgUkWOoEh1pnw==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:59ab:0:b0:386:605:77e with SMTP id
 ffacd0b85a97d-38bf57beaebmr30567243f8f.49.1737708101390; 
 Fri, 24 Jan 2025 00:41:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([141.226.10.168]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 ffacd0b85a97d-38c2a1764b7sm2054961f8f.10.2025.01.24.00.41.40
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Fri, 24 Jan 2025 00:41:40 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 10:41:32 +0200
From: Efraim Flashner <efraim@HIDDEN>
To: vicvbcun <guix@HIDDEN>,
 Roman Scherer <roman.scherer@HIDDEN>,
 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#75510: Building grub-image.png.drv fails with rsvg
Message-ID: <Z5NSPJWIbktkIXlq@3900XT>
Mail-Followup-To: Efraim Flashner <efraim@HIDDEN>,
 vicvbcun <guix@HIDDEN>,
 Roman Scherer <roman.scherer@HIDDEN>,
 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
References: <86bjwcs68x.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z49oywSPyExSDssV@lambda>
 <86v7u8uz7v.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z5AzOQu6Pv0k0We6@lambda>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fszw91GPaHuVdJP+"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Z5AzOQu6Pv0k0We6@lambda>
X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x41AAE7DCCA3D8351
X-PGP-Key: https://flashner.co.il/~efraim/efraim_flashner.asc
X-PGP-Fingerprint: A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75510
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)


--fszw91GPaHuVdJP+
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="RMpJv4c6QrFjiRSJ"
Content-Disposition: inline


--RMpJv4c6QrFjiRSJ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 12:52:25AM +0100, vicvbcun wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> below are my current findings.
>=20
> As of commit
>     87045f0982 (gnu: paritwine: Update to 0.2.1., 2025-01-17)
> guile-rsvg depends on a version of guile-cairo different from the one I g=
et
> by simply building guile-cairo:
>=20
>     $ ./pre-inst-env guix build guile-cairo
>     =E2=87=92 /gnu/store/k4kglplg98098y78flnw0f9wjyyc9zk2-guile-cairo-1.1=
1.2
>=20
> whereas
>=20
>     $ guix gc --references "$(./pre-inst-env guix build guile-rsvg)" | gr=
ep guile-cairo
>     =E2=87=92 /gnu/store/lz8cv73yzzrbwrhafzadixnwgmspz2cg-guile-cairo-1.1=
1.2
>=20
> (gnu build svg) loads both (rsvg) and (cairo) which causes two different
> libguile-cairo.so's to be loaded (interestingly enough the order matters:
> loading (cairo) first would hide the issue):
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> ./pre-inst-env guix shell --no-cwd -C guile guile-cairo guile-rsvg -- \
>     guile -s /dev/stdin <<EOF | grep libguile-cairo
>=20
> (begin
>  (use-modules (ice-9 textual-ports)
>               ;; order matters!
>               (rsvg)
> 	            (cairo))
>=20
> (display (call-with-input-file "/proc/self/maps" get-string-all)))
> EOF
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> shows two different libguile-cairo.so's.  The only difference between the
> two guile-cairo derivation is that they graft cairo to different
> derivations, which in turn differ only in grafting fontconfig-minimal to
> different versions which finally only graft glibc and expat in different
> order.
>=20
> All this confirms the hypothesis Mark expressed in [0].
>=20
> My guess is that the change to rust-ring somehow changes how it interacts
> with grafting.  Perhaps it is added / not added to some hashtable, causing
> iteration order to change?
>=20
> 0: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/47115#23

I tried setting rust-ring's sources to #:target #f but that didn't make
any difference.  I feel like it shouldn't make a difference, and should
probably be #:target #f anyway, but that can be a different time.

I'm attaching a patch that creates the grub image using ungrafted
inputs.  I think it would make sense to go through and figure out which
derivations actually need to use grafted inputs and which ones don't
matter, but I'm not sure it's worth the maintenance burden to check them
regularly.

The image also seems like something that could be #:target #f and we
could cheat by getting a generated image built on a different
architecture, but that's never seemed to work that way, only for
cross-building.

--=20
Efraim Flashner   <efraim@HIDDEN>   =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D =
=D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8
GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

--RMpJv4c6QrFjiRSJ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename="0001-bootloader-grub-Create-grub-background-image-with-un.patch"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

=46rom 5d617f45c32834fb645975787c4e364fc603e2cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-ID: <5d617f45c32834fb645975787c4e364fc603e2cb.1737707855.git.efraim=
@flashner.co.il>
=46rom: Efraim Flashner <efraim@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 10:36:16 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] bootloader/grub: Create grub background image with ungraft=
ed
 inputs.

This fixes bug https://issues.guix.gnu.org/75510.

* gnu/bootloader/grub.scm (image->png): Create the grub-image using
ungrafted inputs.

Change-Id: Ia23dd081d9711c703b7bf795dc376e024bb5caff
---
 gnu/bootloader/grub.scm | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gnu/bootloader/grub.scm b/gnu/bootloader/grub.scm
index c2462d5d036..e136482c541 100644
--- a/gnu/bootloader/grub.scm
+++ b/gnu/bootloader/grub.scm
@@ -140,7 +140,12 @@ (define* (image->png image #:key width height)
                              (svg->png #+image #$output
                                        #:width #$width
                                        #:height #$height))
-                           (copy-file #+image #$output))))))
+                           (copy-file #+image #$output))))
+                 ;; Work around a bug in grafts where different versions of
+                 ;; guile-cairo are loaded from (gnu build svg).
+                 ;; As seen in https://issues.guix.gnu.org/47115#23 and
+                 ;; in https://issues.guix.gnu.org/75510.
+                 #:options '(#:graft? #f)))
=20
 (define* (grub-background-image config)
   "Return the GRUB background image defined in CONFIG or #f if none was fo=
und.

base-commit: 97fe03d53635de996028562da9e65b697eedf0f5
--=20
Efraim Flashner   <efraim@HIDDEN>   =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D =
=D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8
GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted


--RMpJv4c6QrFjiRSJ--

--fszw91GPaHuVdJP+
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=jwIH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--fszw91GPaHuVdJP+--




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#75510; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 75510) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jan 2025 23:52:46 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 21 18:52:46 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58164 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1taO2z-0007T1-5y
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2025 18:52:46 -0500
Received: from mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de ([85.215.255.24]:42849)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <guix@HIDDEN>)
 id 1taO2q-0007Sg-Dq
 for 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2025 18:52:37 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1737503547; cv=none;
 d=strato.com; s=strato-dkim-0002;
 b=FlDBJxt5m+pg5V8UbdwgDqzsa5EBwkbwIkD/f7uQlmnp4O9DFMzS9vASmKB84D5eEl
 A55Fe1lZJmC8pYuA8cip63F2vu3UTTIKgGzUGTCNP3v4952wVWa2fIqfUZfgRqOM5mrQ
 CkGpsk93aNMjDRPg5Xrm0M901nFMW43scnIUoDp30EXWYGQoF27aVtFkQ26FlBK6cnxp
 2RS5jKzYkl+ygp1ScfS8ibzQl9lojkxajhZy3UpIAuXM+r0uyQeRdW4RlxJsvruciuSA
 dSmFZzSS71BeDL3rc0RzpPe9HfLJXovR9BLhWx7yn57qItQFAWapFyyhvliG5uoNyqjg
 G1gg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1737503547;
 s=strato-dkim-0002; d=strato.com;
 h=In-Reply-To:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Cc:Date:
 From:Subject:Sender;
 bh=Lwqz1y8hPfCuKvzDhC4x1eLs+9I8nRpmAcN5vZ7pWOc=;
 b=jmyXEMEeTmRpsiTYwNQsYee4dspeMc05+EO9YQXUDkGf+808S5BuVkB6Qn5kq+8OoN
 0RziT27Wa9NJ51UxDmNyKopKBBxeCXHRXA37YPMUPN0y1D9oDPnRZuK6nD0Sp+4NuEM5
 ur6aAYI4Jv4/vVv1lH7V9KhU3aPyhDTHlDUniPe2RtUQR/jZl64k1PaY369CwmrfzZ1k
 s7PS1JVc7DbrPGNO+E7Wksar3j5KWA7b8gErnMEiLDN6G/msKkz5J2qGG1wSg44+Kukk
 9GBxuqrI/QMxtJmVvh4sHnu2uke7e441WTuVEXhW0WVJDN/y+2cueVOV8al8dJQ6ntnf
 3vTQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; strato.com;
    arc=none;
    dkim=none
X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1737503547;
 s=strato-dkim-0002; d=ikherbers.com;
 h=In-Reply-To:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Cc:Date:
 From:Subject:Sender;
 bh=Lwqz1y8hPfCuKvzDhC4x1eLs+9I8nRpmAcN5vZ7pWOc=;
 b=Uo7nn8zTl1vytng8BX8anvdqBWerrK/xvb1JGIC+d2eMAxL/0RXYPc8MaFslgQmPoq
 3xwicUjLhnLexigt/wYkuPvu6PV0lQfyU9ansBlRhcUeQrAEdIKSmr5GEHv4WAR9Ah3o
 QKIWB0UbnC+B+0lJxMPbw0EHFcoVVtHJ7G+rnuB9DVGAxBZfv5EVZR/ONMwHjUeDYYCI
 jgP4jiUOnQ7tM60g02oZjjjyvgiEo/Wc2s9NCIeNASFoKwqqVos7pGLPYCoZOXdIr5lM
 qg2bsD8cQ8g5SDWrdz/XCqtccxiz8t2Dj74gGC91dRhWX6DrmRO5CWhkScSY8EW+2q2d
 oNBQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1737503547;
 s=strato-dkim-0003; d=ikherbers.com;
 h=In-Reply-To:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Cc:Date:
 From:Subject:Sender;
 bh=Lwqz1y8hPfCuKvzDhC4x1eLs+9I8nRpmAcN5vZ7pWOc=;
 b=MTVIUBG/Ds5q3Rkg8AJp6Lpna5CI0GgyHTg5RM7oe1F6LXaT3YMMwJfZprCMCQaDqe
 sjNWcBcojq6NZ6knzwCQ==
X-RZG-AUTH: ":IUwNfkitaf3qOWm2b/jA5tveVwUUcwH3Nk6Yq72yyCbdHpqhh0xAC7Jg4vTFWNm2UVThQMF1Lgp4FitIyyXLUSuww0YUCA=="
Received: from lambda.localdomain by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 51.2.17 AUTH)
 with ESMTPSA id 5193b310LNqQSr8
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate);
 Wed, 22 Jan 2025 00:52:26 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 00:52:25 +0100
From: vicvbcun <guix@HIDDEN>
To: Roman Scherer <roman.scherer@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#75510: Building grub-image.png.drv fails with rsvg
Message-ID: <Z5AzOQu6Pv0k0We6@lambda>
Mail-Followup-To: vicvbcun <guix@HIDDEN>,
 Roman Scherer <roman.scherer@HIDDEN>,
 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Efraim Flashner <efraim@HIDDEN>,
 Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
References: <86bjwcs68x.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z49oywSPyExSDssV@lambda>
 <86v7u8uz7v.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <86v7u8uz7v.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75510
Cc: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>, 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 Efraim Flashner <efraim@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Hi,

below are my current findings.

As of commit
     87045f0982 (gnu: paritwine: Update to 0.2.1., 2025-01-17)
guile-rsvg depends on a version of guile-cairo different from the one I 
get by simply building guile-cairo:

     $ ./pre-inst-env guix build guile-cairo
     ⇒ /gnu/store/k4kglplg98098y78flnw0f9wjyyc9zk2-guile-cairo-1.11.2

whereas

     $ guix gc --references "$(./pre-inst-env guix build guile-rsvg)" | grep guile-cairo
     ⇒ /gnu/store/lz8cv73yzzrbwrhafzadixnwgmspz2cg-guile-cairo-1.11.2

(gnu build svg) loads both (rsvg) and (cairo) which causes two different 
libguile-cairo.so's to be loaded (interestingly enough the order 
matters: loading (cairo) first would hide the issue):
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
./pre-inst-env guix shell --no-cwd -C guile guile-cairo guile-rsvg -- \
     guile -s /dev/stdin <<EOF | grep libguile-cairo

(begin
  (use-modules (ice-9 textual-ports)
               ;; order matters!
               (rsvg)
	            (cairo))

(display (call-with-input-file "/proc/self/maps" get-string-all)))
EOF
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
shows two different libguile-cairo.so's.  The only difference between 
the two guile-cairo derivation is that they graft cairo to different 
derivations, which in turn differ only in grafting fontconfig-minimal to 
different versions which finally only graft glibc and expat in different 
order.

All this confirms the hypothesis Mark expressed in [0].

My guess is that the change to rust-ring somehow changes how it 
interacts with grafting.  Perhaps it is added / not added to some 
hashtable, causing iteration order to change?

0: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/47115#23




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#75510; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 75510) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jan 2025 12:29:53 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 21 07:29:53 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53572 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1taDOD-0008RI-6n
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2025 07:29:53 -0500
Received: from mail-ej1-x634.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::634]:61908)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <roman.scherer@HIDDEN>)
 id 1taDOA-0008R2-9z
 for 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2025 07:29:50 -0500
Received: by mail-ej1-x634.google.com with SMTP id
 a640c23a62f3a-aaee0b309adso834845166b.3
 for <75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 21 Jan 2025 04:29:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=burningswell-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1737462584;
 x=1738067384; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; 
 h=mime-version:message-id:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to
 :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=lDGS6/GQ77n/14s66rHf3L1VCDUAG4HBVrnR9T23X04=;
 b=07udRN33mn+hs0SvQi8mXX295pSXdWbRY3P2GvpkSqVbNzkLqGtf0dqDFDN8hUTA6J
 q5xkXYBYaY7Fi9s9NjWNB8lqf2+ShB2royZiM/fcufzXBfXWc9BB+Um+0Anoh9K0znXM
 HFJhYQGqDL5kYaPTdWlLGTDUC1PiFFkf/TleV8wu3aXqNGXYViNEzM0MCrfLxtAKTJDZ
 gWjT16rZB4XDfcaebzIkHOnZ18CX9L+DwpISvgVGQ5+wh3fIj+/tjxeDFtUrloou9NSx
 v4g0fLmggY6iw9DKD74bbERlb52X8wXW+kI42h26ADV9rNs3zglAod58kvKEc7b+6l9/
 9U6w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1737462584; x=1738067384;
 h=mime-version:message-id:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to
 :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date
 :message-id:reply-to;
 bh=lDGS6/GQ77n/14s66rHf3L1VCDUAG4HBVrnR9T23X04=;
 b=jQLm2END5/gOpV0RBJWmVAdeTJfBO0j4wxHybLtkI6FphA+usffajoCz1EP7oh/0cV
 Tst0kx+POqD7Q75Y2+jM7z7UIpqC44gaEmgK4/dpn61411SXXmbhOgxYX6sWGk4xdioK
 dNsP7lRjv5bOpiINzyjC/gmT5Owlh9mvGGAmr3RcSbsiHBDmYqj8dd+ofuj4sOHc3ZOz
 Q2lSWDBdjcX7uTWTZxp7kjgqlhWZCpoev+SYPnvY+LLjVrJ1rTbp5AGCL/xUS0NtFD9j
 Eag+gJztha7PlOdyJlmKg5mZQoR6V/H15EorjS7RRdx90Ic74s8puRN86yK/bgquJEDH
 Yfhw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Ywg6GLm/XETHOikvO98jv0auUv6oiDr4fnzQ1R7+kpaGErpSkXz
 iDrA/uGgl6LUlnOCLyB9Vv8CK6vMtSjLE7Wh4pZpKsE8ZWs0oFwZNcQiCIeKYaLtApn9PrcwfTo
 QZjk=
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnct7Ed3FB70lNxerezB46UC59Im61iB7rZJ4klmqys+nlyuZgpt1SHHXlxcTKlh
 kTKFrozzR+9vqUYAZcCQSklzBI2msJgGp6BWoUrAiPu5Mfgm0BAXWT1tpVn3+48OrWoFO1uTOr6
 FUuAlPLwAs1BQFztg1icuW/Chah4I3JwCyWct/YUOJsVsBZEUzurg7XEfTynYKYIxoVbMSJMjPp
 6jxcPwcBqUfeRRntSHOjjb8z6QlucY4a0hDDKE9obX6Wwq/7Ms940xa9OwiWxiNLme+lR06mA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFEYjzmMUumeSAAF9u0HKVopBWJVEELaqaUmJ2ErQjTiHjeVuNgRzYVSXTCEux+wuMRCfmzRQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:60d2:b0:aa6:82ea:69d6 with SMTP id
 a640c23a62f3a-ab38b10cfbfmr1498464066b.18.1737462583901; 
 Tue, 21 Jan 2025 04:29:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from m1 ([2a01:599:126:6b09:5846:b7e7:8b1b:c137])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 a640c23a62f3a-ab384c63b5fsm747988266b.32.2025.01.21.04.29.42
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Tue, 21 Jan 2025 04:29:43 -0800 (PST)
From: Roman Scherer <roman.scherer@HIDDEN>
To: vicvbcun <guix@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#75510: Building grub-image.png.drv fails with rsvg
In-Reply-To: <Z49oywSPyExSDssV@lambda> (vicvbcun's message of "Tue, 21 Jan
 2025 10:28:43 +0100")
References: <86bjwcs68x.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z49oywSPyExSDssV@lambda>
User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.7; emacs 29.4
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 13:29:40 +0100
Message-ID: <86v7u8uz7v.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75510
Cc: 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Efraim Flashner <efraim@HIDDEN>,
 Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain


Hi vicvbcun,

thanks looking into this! Good to know when this started failing, but
I'm still lost understanding what the issue is, why it works without
grafts, or how to fix it.

Maybe Efraim has an idea? I put him on CC.

Thanks for your help!

Roman

vicvbcun <guix@HIDDEN> writes:

> Hi,
>
> On 2025-01-12T10:58:54+0100, Roman Scherer wrote:
>>
>>Hello Guix,
>>
>>I can't reconfigure my (aarch64) system anymore. When building
>>/gnu/store/bpda8gfvxm6iv3mc6n8sf3ydxc5b6zi9-grub-image.png.drv I see the following backtrace:
>>
>>```
>>building /gnu/store/bpda8gfvxm6iv3mc6n8sf3ydxc5b6zi9-grub-image.png.drv...
>>Backtrace:
>>           2 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/3rcg4ann6607iqsh1aj84cqdnw8?")
>>In gnu/build/svg.scm:
>>     53:6  1 (svg->png "/gnu/store/41841pid2mmsvar44vy9xafsrf3cyb9i?" ?)
>>In unknown file:
>>           0 (rsvg-handle-render-cairo #<rsvg-handle fffff770ae60> #)
>>
>>ERROR: In procedure rsvg-handle-render-cairo:
>>Wrong type (expecting finalized smob): #<cairo-context fffff770ad90>
>>builder for `/gnu/store/bpda8gfvxm6iv3mc6n8sf3ydxc5b6zi9-grub-image.png.drv' failed with exit code 1
>>build of /gnu/store/bpda8gfvxm6iv3mc6n8sf3ydxc5b6zi9-grub-image.png.drv failed
>>View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/bp/da8gfvxm6iv3mc6n8sf3ydxc5b6zi9-grub-image.png.drv.gz'.
>>applying 4 grafts for asahi-scripts-20240623 ...
>>cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/mnavmxm513zwy16m1lyz2yppdgjbam3l-grub.cfg.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
>>guix system: error: build of `/gnu/store/mnavmxm513zwy16m1lyz2yppdgjbam3l-grub.cfg.drv' failed
>>```
>>
>>Any ideas how to fix this?
>
> I have the same problem on my server, also aarch64-linux.  A minimal
> reproducer that fails on both my server and my laptop (x86_64-linux)
> is
>
>     guix build -s aarch64-linux -e '
>     (begin
>      (use-modules (gnu bootloader)
>                   (gnu bootloader grub))
>      ((@@ (gnu bootloader grub) grub-background-image)
>       (bootloader-configuration
>        (bootloader grub-efi-bootloader))))
>     '
>
> I have tried bisecting it with this (see the attached log) and ended
> up at commit
>     6975b1871b (gnu: rust-ring-0.17: Build source using trivial-build-system., 2024-12-15)
> If I revert this commit and additionally
>     584c79d5df (gnu: rust-ring-0.13: Build source using trivial-build-system., 2024-12-17)
>     57be7a0184 (gnu: rust-ring-0.14: Build source using trivial-build-system., 2024-12-17)
>     7db675130f (gnu: rust-ring-0.16: Build source using trivial-build-system., 2024-12-17)
> (make fails when reverting only 6975b1871b) on top of commit
>     87045f0982 (gnu: paritwine: Update to 0.2.1., 2025-01-17)
> I get no error.  No idea what that has to do with grafts though.
>
> vicvbcun
>
> [2. text/plain; bisect-log.txt]...

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQFTBAEBCAA9FiEE0iajOdjfRIFd3gygPdpSUn0qwZkFAmePkzQfHHJvbWFuLnNj
aGVyZXJAYnVybmluZ3N3ZWxsLmNvbQAKCRA92lJSfSrBmR6pCADGKT461YClUFTU
pXf9twejkKOZ06yfSMQPnZkcUT4Q6mjyhLZmERc4OX/lghP4Lma5GwT65bJw//jU
ZY9LkmgjmQooIBhcBD4h1E7l4tsUnu05d0+9nOpJSCu8L1/H7jgcA0+c42BbrPav
UPRiOACd861CoiH9T+DOoUqM2HpwzP3usSJ2iXf6spPNe+UbNP7Ze+NkR4utsOSw
bhln820npQGtS19uGRxkFhbmQtCCHmN+fdu8eK9E+5qBEspyvE4bzndrCVKnwMbh
XKXgjfZ8jfCWI6C9RCvrnEJC1WUe4iAoEGIstx86YomfRBylRsNj1vEFxI/qzluS
66e9d67Q
=aq9O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#75510; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 75510) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jan 2025 09:28:54 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 21 04:28:54 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53281 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1taAZ3-0007Ge-Ou
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2025 04:28:54 -0500
Received: from mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de ([81.169.146.160]:44855)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <guix@HIDDEN>)
 id 1taAYz-0007GM-8U
 for 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2025 04:28:50 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1737451724; cv=none;
 d=strato.com; s=strato-dkim-0002;
 b=oIgwaZsSaO++QIiJO6B4dhWrlaMXGKXynzBPjC44LCy7IHMxYe87u18sdv71dDvkZC
 qSKejvrT8SNIdOPBNZDunnqu+XdwcVYK/uqLjCozNse/+ZGbf184p6E8cmNRaV1H9kJR
 6uQi8hzQNlHbeb39f8f5NDvIHaw0yr0bE/5GTJQCTAPX0exXbNg5IJjkUfGNSqOe3mq3
 bvrCVdwX600qPvsZLWS7MxMkBWp+wj3qhCBRXjqXJoOOmL0XFx/tka65YUWROrfH4ilf
 WBsuqPvyTfH4P5fu7+4Wy0Gj6x3V5FTJpK8TsBqTrBjWnj1MXsqEvNwuNK9JR1dBmpkv
 hczA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1737451724;
 s=strato-dkim-0002; d=strato.com;
 h=In-Reply-To:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Cc:Date:
 From:Subject:Sender;
 bh=NH0V3Po8WmSn9XUxSFem2JFJfFwHtCJpRbAMVf1p/I0=;
 b=hrefIP67iYBAAsou+D3qqUHWwlzHS6dl5OUJOI8nyuvXNOXGzdB7OJ4U+CA5EuM9rh
 UxxpvZ1fVASUSYB+CgVtabBKwialB/IJoJJQQjRjsdRo/whAwXXe29EhGKWe7317IhmD
 q+hXFNMtruYIiRje4HLesf5fAqfHikq1KBahVNAIBlBru5Vq+HBjQ98UKYO2q4hT53xc
 l67DlhFg93y/ZwICBp61o6FZDkr/u+cfT89okPoeBQieG+eVX3KYCQoynLHruQ0hEhRG
 ldvRRol3nvML+s/Ln9HgRfUQx9bB/pHoztRNYh3uKssrZcBGxXA0VR3jrHK2H2tF4OA1
 3/cQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; strato.com;
    arc=none;
    dkim=none
X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1737451724;
 s=strato-dkim-0002; d=ikherbers.com;
 h=In-Reply-To:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Cc:Date:
 From:Subject:Sender;
 bh=NH0V3Po8WmSn9XUxSFem2JFJfFwHtCJpRbAMVf1p/I0=;
 b=W0UjdKz5TTM8cdPsFciWPkOVqaTxMcfoberQvpLGHnTgYH4QLsGZFa9QLynTeGrEKj
 fGSDo6tflKytVKaPTlBsMuyuowdoKXqqyms3vYtn9aB26dLXObG1j/kyD/D9oJxXdNKU
 f85qNvXskS/VrveCF4UHaEuiyX4B7eOjOYHk6q0hyFlkJAb9SRf2Gfs1hJXND/HdTD4t
 ArHVGd/74ADOHS3pM/3qE/LGXuBfKcUWcsoSAF68f27+4sUCLGxKRliVLi6dxjA3LBhG
 XcFxYp5MNAiIpTmBaGx/AeruSfgwrSbu0LXH+kY99gfHTb7sm2jcOKyws5KqWHzYUiK1
 N5Dw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1737451724;
 s=strato-dkim-0003; d=ikherbers.com;
 h=In-Reply-To:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Cc:Date:
 From:Subject:Sender;
 bh=NH0V3Po8WmSn9XUxSFem2JFJfFwHtCJpRbAMVf1p/I0=;
 b=kRUaAv7HvaXmXrCQ9VVg95oSGp9F+eAAR8en8yLF0kYUenMEdrQRPHDVbYOFbTN0QX
 i8pBPHwTPa3bFBwguUDQ==
X-RZG-AUTH: ":IUwNfkitaf3qOWm2b/jA5tveVwUUcwH3Nk6Yq72yyCbdHpqjhxwXUzRPTUenFbzqrjHgrCU5kl70Fz4LeepjrV9HuLy7Tw=="
Received: from lambda.localdomain by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 51.2.17 AUTH)
 with ESMTPSA id 5193b310L9SiPma
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate);
 Tue, 21 Jan 2025 10:28:44 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 10:28:43 +0100
From: vicvbcun <guix@HIDDEN>
To: Roman Scherer <roman.scherer@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#75510: Building grub-image.png.drv fails with rsvg
Message-ID: <Z49oywSPyExSDssV@lambda>
Mail-Followup-To: vicvbcun <guix@HIDDEN>,
 Roman Scherer <roman.scherer@HIDDEN>,
 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
References: <86bjwcs68x.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="SLU9ZDUQExSunWzy"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <86bjwcs68x.fsf@HIDDEN>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75510
Cc: 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)


--SLU9ZDUQExSunWzy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi,

On 2025-01-12T10:58:54+0100, Roman Scherer wrote:
>
>Hello Guix,
>
>I can't reconfigure my (aarch64) system anymore. When building
>/gnu/store/bpda8gfvxm6iv3mc6n8sf3ydxc5b6zi9-grub-image.png.drv I see the following backtrace:
>
>```
>building /gnu/store/bpda8gfvxm6iv3mc6n8sf3ydxc5b6zi9-grub-image.png.drv...
>Backtrace:
>           2 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/3rcg4ann6607iqsh1aj84cqdnw8?")
>In gnu/build/svg.scm:
>     53:6  1 (svg->png "/gnu/store/41841pid2mmsvar44vy9xafsrf3cyb9i?" ?)
>In unknown file:
>           0 (rsvg-handle-render-cairo #<rsvg-handle fffff770ae60> #)
>
>ERROR: In procedure rsvg-handle-render-cairo:
>Wrong type (expecting finalized smob): #<cairo-context fffff770ad90>
>builder for `/gnu/store/bpda8gfvxm6iv3mc6n8sf3ydxc5b6zi9-grub-image.png.drv' failed with exit code 1
>build of /gnu/store/bpda8gfvxm6iv3mc6n8sf3ydxc5b6zi9-grub-image.png.drv failed
>View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/bp/da8gfvxm6iv3mc6n8sf3ydxc5b6zi9-grub-image.png.drv.gz'.
>applying 4 grafts for asahi-scripts-20240623 ...
>cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/mnavmxm513zwy16m1lyz2yppdgjbam3l-grub.cfg.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
>guix system: error: build of `/gnu/store/mnavmxm513zwy16m1lyz2yppdgjbam3l-grub.cfg.drv' failed
>```
>
>Any ideas how to fix this?

I have the same problem on my server, also aarch64-linux.  A minimal 
reproducer that fails on both my server and my laptop (x86_64-linux) is

     guix build -s aarch64-linux -e '
     (begin
      (use-modules (gnu bootloader)
                   (gnu bootloader grub))
      ((@@ (gnu bootloader grub) grub-background-image)
       (bootloader-configuration
        (bootloader grub-efi-bootloader))))
     '

I have tried bisecting it with this (see the attached log) and ended up 
at commit
     6975b1871b (gnu: rust-ring-0.17: Build source using trivial-build-system., 2024-12-15)
If I revert this commit and additionally
     584c79d5df (gnu: rust-ring-0.13: Build source using trivial-build-system., 2024-12-17)
     57be7a0184 (gnu: rust-ring-0.14: Build source using trivial-build-system., 2024-12-17)
     7db675130f (gnu: rust-ring-0.16: Build source using trivial-build-system., 2024-12-17)
(make fails when reverting only 6975b1871b) on top of commit
     87045f0982 (gnu: paritwine: Update to 0.2.1., 2025-01-17)
I get no error.  No idea what that has to do with grafts though.

vicvbcun

--SLU9ZDUQExSunWzy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="bisect-log.txt"

git bisect start
# status: waiting for both good and bad commits
# good: [af07f6bfe94bb3dac1f46533e586d4186d7e59b6] gnu: python-trio-websocket: Update to 0.11.1.
git bisect good af07f6bfe94bb3dac1f46533e586d4186d7e59b6
# status: waiting for bad commit, 1 good commit known
# bad: [87045f0982bd7aebb07b380cbf322651227546f4] gnu: paritwine: Update to 0.2.1.
git bisect bad 87045f0982bd7aebb07b380cbf322651227546f4
# bad: [312c7d4b7bb084a54a6d39273c1e1da37dc9971e] gnu: zoxide: Update to 0.9.6.
git bisect bad 312c7d4b7bb084a54a6d39273c1e1da37dc9971e
# bad: [db99452d7d776f69a3745b6e072b63d212c9cd1e] gnu: rust-derive-arbitrary-1: Update to 1.4.1.
git bisect bad db99452d7d776f69a3745b6e072b63d212c9cd1e
# good: [701159efe0ad0cae514c5bd690ff2d897d2633eb] gnu: rust-http-body-util-0.1: Update to 0.1.2.
git bisect good 701159efe0ad0cae514c5bd690ff2d897d2633eb
# bad: [a7950bf0699ae1faa763b1220c76fec08898936d] gnu: rust-git-testament-0.2: Update to 0.2.6.
git bisect bad a7950bf0699ae1faa763b1220c76fec08898936d
# good: [a7af54ec322297cd171000fbe9df6fe70f59a482] gnu: Add rust-pyo3-0.23.
git bisect good a7af54ec322297cd171000fbe9df6fe70f59a482
# bad: [979839cf777b42675db22d4df2cb38a4b5835256] gnu: x265: Link together all library variants.
git bisect bad 979839cf777b42675db22d4df2cb38a4b5835256
# bad: [57ed4771e9c0d571510e613f70f3fc578901fd60] gnu: rust-ruzstd-0.7: Update to 0.7.3.
git bisect bad 57ed4771e9c0d571510e613f70f3fc578901fd60
# good: [5c48aa9954085b276491e85f0980a817ac8f2c7d] gnu: alacritty: Skip a test.
git bisect good 5c48aa9954085b276491e85f0980a817ac8f2c7d
# bad: [584c79d5dfb10208a9704a01f79af79f7d012544] gnu: rust-ring-0.13: Build source using trivial-build-system.
git bisect bad 584c79d5dfb10208a9704a01f79af79f7d012544
# bad: [7db675130fca0a17e3d7e9631a117c3bba883d22] gnu: rust-ring-0.16: Build source using trivial-build-system.
git bisect bad 7db675130fca0a17e3d7e9631a117c3bba883d22
# bad: [6975b1871bce10a5aeffc49aa37271d7a7555ca1] gnu: rust-ring-0.17: Build source using trivial-build-system.
git bisect bad 6975b1871bce10a5aeffc49aa37271d7a7555ca1
# first bad commit: [6975b1871bce10a5aeffc49aa37271d7a7555ca1] gnu: rust-ring-0.17: Build source using trivial-build-system.

--SLU9ZDUQExSunWzy--




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#75510; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 75510) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jan 2025 19:22:16 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 17 14:22:16 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38868 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1tYrv6-0001Xz-7e
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jan 2025 14:22:16 -0500
Received: from fout-b1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([202.12.124.144]:33229)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1tYrv1-0001XV-Og
 for 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jan 2025 14:22:13 -0500
Received: from phl-compute-09.internal (phl-compute-09.phl.internal
 [10.202.2.49])
 by mailfout.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB7B6114011E;
 Fri, 17 Jan 2025 14:22:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from phl-mailfrontend-01 ([10.202.2.162])
 by phl-compute-09.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 17 Jan 2025 14:22:04 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name;
 h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type
 :date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id
 :mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=
 mesmtp; t=1737141724; x=1737228124; bh=gVeNN3NyVEX56AJftbzyQuCPz
 rpY0QacJn/DQC2sMfY=; b=2FVrm72sQq/j+n14DiuA62yutlthKdgzXCYd4zc5n
 VysCzvX/VX4gsgY0kQMVy8LAcNGjD48v6NJt1vjIZQscmdOLjeEf+Zj5t8a6z60M
 9erMEeJTkt9F9xjdiH+xG/ssbCTy7m07CTdcEAuZ9jdlK3EfsaOlbnPXU6+Ih6Dh
 zk=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding
 :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id
 :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version
 :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy
 :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1737141724; x=
 1737228124; bh=gVeNN3NyVEX56AJftbzyQuCPzrpY0QacJn/DQC2sMfY=; b=Y
 gxDJXLP+TMa7I9NHvUzjAUAmOLbQE85BwpdPxKcUwfnTCojDiDH5NucIj8q5B2de
 mRPIv4k3+pOukZwey27EMpyxDIg2UiI7sApVicoQtoBcX72MI28eoUhIgAIVmo8F
 0oVgAHNugtLexzpZyMF9Kkj1tjmU9Wug7QtxOLCvboB0Tih+mtNr0+dNR0OsPf9f
 ycXkX31Wr+e+hqrNDqm3u3sJEg3NyYD9ROUJzwbohb9I+2nts6LCD95uEk28+EEZ
 B6EvuexvoVWs1yjHidGGQUvpdh+558arePoNyvWJxigi5CykVcO0wJVN56mdLjf0
 50APeyOKA9L8E7CrPKTAg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:3K2KZ_qG4ZSWqh3onPlxg0Hl-n2UE8TeDif9COehnVIaoPVnWyLkRQ>
 <xme:3K2KZ5owuYXM7KfVe7QQvL_m7XdHRO0xjo5KyTAd4h_0TpXGBuZUykXSebM7Jv_Ht
 5pWDkILzTau2Pwegg>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:3K2KZ8Nl3KLrI9rlPFqpLs8JsbGL0uSHyHdJwMrIgVMazPdhnFXZ4PZ-dn2wV61UjG8mhv-BqZZ1w8f0DU_ksmcw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefuddrudeifedguddvudcutefuodetggdotefrod
 ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdp
 uffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivg
 hnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvvefukfhfgggtugfgjgesthhqredttddt
 vdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcuhfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhird
 hnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepheeiteeuveeufeeitdehtdeuieejleduudeg
 ffeiueejieffheehgeduhfelhfetnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrg
 hmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgdpnhgspghrtghp
 thhtohepvddpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtoheprhhomhgrnhdrshgthh
 gvrhgvrhessghurhhnihhnghhsfigvlhhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepjeehhedutdes
 uggvsggsuhhgshdrghhnuhdrohhrgh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:3K2KZy7y64niIqTFz9Gg5yRsDGTUeXOM7n4OFMRKdAgBnZl8J_N2zg>
 <xmx:3K2KZ-41txdjv7nA1ruAXHp5UUqIvBmq9Wcs6NmViemsZrlUSFkMDg>
 <xmx:3K2KZ6hmxE--Ggl1_AkaMFz4vCp3fsvGGTWPZF7drFP-rDQUa8G9_g>
 <xmx:3K2KZw43WDA6EwmZqzY-BdxrIqsI9bDEqbtHXvd4L6L28GVXGXI6Rg>
 <xmx:3K2KZ-HSTTOnjgw-hS1WgC7TaFNvH7uIueeYJ0sPgAsBzPJSwiHRI1fV>
Feedback-ID: i819c4023:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri,
 17 Jan 2025 14:22:03 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 14:22:02 -0500
From: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
To: Roman Scherer <roman.scherer@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#75510: Building grub-image.png.drv fails with rsvg
Message-ID: <Z4qt2iNzoLLsmzB_@HIDDEN>
References: <86bjwcs68x.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z4QmT1tGJj5hhvPu@HIDDEN>
 <Z4SGazuOKCWp6Z61@HIDDEN>
 <73217a34a8baaa1c9e250df38c86591c3070411f75b7b61c084068d32480765f@HIDDEN>
 <86ed12vesy.fsf@HIDDEN> <861px1jy3f.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In-Reply-To: <861px1jy3f.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75510
Cc: 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)

On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 03:48:04PM +0100, Roman Scherer wrote:
> Roman Scherer <roman.scherer@HIDDEN> writes:
>=20
> Hmm, but it looks I'm now stuck using --no-grafts all the time. Any
> ideas how to solve that?

That's not great. I don't really understand this bug. Is it a problem in
Guile? That would seem hard to fix in the short term.

I wonder what is the current status of "ungrafting" efforts in Guix?




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#75510; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 75510) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jan 2025 14:48:21 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 17 09:48:21 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36549 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1tYne0-0000Xw-Rx
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jan 2025 09:48:21 -0500
Received: from mail-ed1-x536.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::536]:60674)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <roman.scherer@HIDDEN>)
 id 1tYndy-0000Xf-9b
 for 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jan 2025 09:48:19 -0500
Received: by mail-ed1-x536.google.com with SMTP id
 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5d90a5581fcso3820335a12.1
 for <75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 17 Jan 2025 06:48:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=burningswell-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1737125292;
 x=1737730092; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; 
 h=mime-version:message-id:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to
 :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=BpEAy1KtdaG7vFiAhdjTJhpIxll89qS2Uh8XoNbkr4I=;
 b=sOUkDHI5ZF/oxdSkSJSGctd0WJpGxfqVoRLCsDpfsvlWNUa/5RUpwI1TPyaerrtHws
 LjI/GwcttU0L3TzaRmwOAlgoc1YTclttYXZNdVkgcPPiCZ3ZWt3wN0UfQk1Yq5ZiaX3R
 Uq37KrFq2D7I9Dk5ok9Jokd0q8laEBtho7kbvo0AltXzr+lqVN1N+UJVYa0XMmkNDGv4
 zChhm0qfSNiuqWNkbgkbKweuVpAjKR6/+FUdIWMrVen+uA5p8xnBrbplOQsXydvA78qC
 7fwFU09OFNQ4ywhkRXXjAUtW0be0zBqlp5vpeZRACpJL1V4fkzRmW4SeP1/7frcauc0O
 UGyQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1737125292; x=1737730092;
 h=mime-version:message-id:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to
 :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date
 :message-id:reply-to;
 bh=BpEAy1KtdaG7vFiAhdjTJhpIxll89qS2Uh8XoNbkr4I=;
 b=rejkBq323cXiYiU/OkhdY7KjRE7gzXSnvJGDBRDrjpoRTmMq4iRyTBz+/eD6Dv8Jhn
 WZSW7s5l258LCSuzKZ0uSwu/IiF6WCe3d0LUc9ItNE0NXguekqERXKaaK0IVLDr6w4j0
 NBJbBB0J7gsWeYUF0gszVJL+f8o/HE2Wp/rqn4hNQTvv49ZwE1uvpdN14H0iJ9rdaKn+
 C7xBx1W4+bmDgKR/ot2YULisz1A2Bbr16weRBQ/4glYOhua0I/djn68AHPw6KcG2yovS
 bplCLQXO5mZC2JlGRJ6zSOz/5+h1y+Sg4aasUHt67addDhZxCC6JTryfvcwjwykaDmzu
 efaw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxeSoC5G1hESX+GN//NVkYs1+xs5XkiHO8+8AaYVnxCG7lXs9Y4
 /n2vXaowsoStKdTG8Duk1GGGUpPf7Btdau5M0vRTuhZQGlHN76c0ezCSgFrE9TJA2Z1r1wy4/c5
 Yh44=
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncv9oc2wvv4FcGXQWiMODAUsVLs8iGSQDCjs5mBmp7zNSuFO8Gj0BnL9/+g+DYh
 rqMhznaWW5vLpR2Z1QPWeIPukoHwZrVIg1k/ojFjmHbF/XJyBvKMf5Hv7col2ZcTEjrmSPOYWBn
 3S9NvGYoUF/W+cTff+84LaoK8KzSvYRguXXCXrPUS2TVQLbshlFe1kYaCLEmEXU2fBV/f26V9wZ
 FYqBC9XACn5MCrRh5a9wSD7hWH7AAhPRIeh7SQYm9wlPakI8RVUleY5jF3a
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFWwuUWt1FJ5eNCbz205Unc4wNiFjxexDX3v7WNNoR/+/b0p7j9V2CPfgm5pjsNymuOESLx5w==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:3553:b0:5d9:fb83:5e77 with SMTP id
 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5db7d2f7f12mr2788732a12.10.1737125291752; 
 Fri, 17 Jan 2025 06:48:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from m1 ([2a01:599:11b:d164:8b54:e489:1ac3:a284])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5db73670dbbsm1623804a12.28.2025.01.17.06.48.10
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Fri, 17 Jan 2025 06:48:11 -0800 (PST)
From: Roman Scherer <roman.scherer@HIDDEN>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#75510: Building grub-image.png.drv fails with rsvg
In-Reply-To: <86ed12vesy.fsf@HIDDEN> (Roman Scherer's message of
 "Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:39:25 +0100")
References: <86bjwcs68x.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z4QmT1tGJj5hhvPu@HIDDEN>
 <Z4SGazuOKCWp6Z61@HIDDEN>
 <73217a34a8baaa1c9e250df38c86591c3070411f75b7b61c084068d32480765f@HIDDEN>
 <86ed12vesy.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.7; emacs 29.4
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 15:48:04 +0100
Message-ID: <861px1jy3f.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75510
Cc: 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

Roman Scherer <roman.scherer@HIDDEN> writes:

Hmm, but it looks I'm now stuck using --no-grafts all the time. Any
ideas how to solve that?

> Roman Scherer <roman.scherer@HIDDEN> writes:
>
> So, it looks like this issue might be related to:
>
> - https://issues.guix.gnu.org/47853
> - https://issues.guix.gnu.org/47115
>
> I reconfigured my system now with --no-grafts, and this time it worked.
>
>> <#secure method=pgpmime mode=sign>
>>
>> Hi Leo,
>>
>> here is the `guix desribe` run as my normal user account.
>>
>> ```
>> [roman@m1 guix-home]$ guix describe
>> Generation 305	Jan 12 2025 09:17:24	(current)
>>   asahi 2a6f8b5
>>     repository URL: https://github.com/asahi-guix/channel
>>     branch: main
>>     commit: 2a6f8b59d97a3451639f128ff1c53d9009897e45
>>   guix 5d6c876
>>     repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
>>     branch: master
>>     commit: 5d6c8767f67885bc9b2c8f18ab1f667d0065346b
>>   nonguix 565d287
>>     repository URL: https://gitlab.com/nonguix/nonguix
>>     branch: master
>>     commit: 565d287b7502ef9435b2fba38622d0a8f458677b
>>   r0man-guix 9bb5571
>>     repository URL: https://github.com/r0man/guix-channel
>>     branch: main
>>     commit: 9bb55710a8dc61a23c6cc4e8d2bcdc9503008492
>> ```
>>
>> As this user I usually run the following command to reconfigure my
>> system.
>>
>> ```
>> sudo guix system reconfigure -L modules modules/r0man/guix/system/m1.scm
>> -v 5
>> ```
>>
>> I don't use the -i flag when reconfiguring. Is that problematic?
>>
>> So here's the guix describe I usually get when I'm reconfiguring my
>> system:
>>
>> [roman@m1 guix-home]$ sudo guix describe
>>   asahi 2a6f8b5
>>     repository URL: https://github.com/asahi-guix/channel
>>     branch: main
>>     commit: 2a6f8b59d97a3451639f128ff1c53d9009897e45
>>   guix 5d6c876
>>     repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
>>     branch: master
>>     commit: 5d6c8767f67885bc9b2c8f18ab1f667d0065346b
>>   nonguix 565d287
>>     repository URL: https://gitlab.com/nonguix/nonguix
>>     branch: master
>>     commit: 565d287b7502ef9435b2fba38622d0a8f458677b
>>   r0man-guix 9bb5571
>>     repository URL: https://github.com/r0man/guix-channel
>>     branch: main
>>     commit: 9bb55710a8dc61a23c6cc4e8d2bcdc9503008492
>>
>> And this is the "guix describe" with the -i flag:
>>
>> [roman@m1 guix-home]$ sudo -i guix describe
>>   guix 121e96d
>>     repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
>>     branch: master
>>     commit: 121e96dca273ab407df11725da0026ee34abdf79
>>
>> Reconfiguring with the -i flag does not work, because I'm missing some
>> modules from the channels that aren't listed there.
>>
>> I'm also linking my config, just in case:
>>
>> https://github.com/r0man/guix-home/blob/main/modules/r0man/guix/system/m1.scm
>>
>> Thanks for your help, Roman.
>>
>> Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> writes:
>>
>>> On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 03:30:07PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 10:58:54AM +0100, Roman Scherer wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > I can't reconfigure my (aarch64) system anymore. When building
>>>> > /gnu/store/bpda8gfvxm6iv3mc6n8sf3ydxc5b6zi9-grub-image.png.drv I see the following backtrace:
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>> > View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/bp/da8gfvxm6iv3mc6n8sf3ydxc5b6zi9-grub-image.png.drv.gz'.
>>>>
>>>> Can you share this log?
>>>
>>> Okay, thanks.
>>>
>>> Also, from the environment where you try to reconfigure, can you also
>>> share the results of `guix describe`?
>>>
>>> What I mean by that is, for example, if you log in to the root account
>>> to reconfigure, run `guix describe` from there.
>>>
>>> Another example: if you do `sudo -i guix system reconfigure [...]`, run
>>> `sudo -i guix describe`.
>>>
>>> Does that make sense?

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQFTBAEBCAA9FiEE0iajOdjfRIFd3gygPdpSUn0qwZkFAmeKbaQfHHJvbWFuLnNj
aGVyZXJAYnVybmluZ3N3ZWxsLmNvbQAKCRA92lJSfSrBmV5GB/49g8p+x6Zr9lXV
B45SgDgChG0lNBmdXAeydzeJ9KsMoJLTR0S9WUywm4bUS1j6w2l1ZEr8PVxYiaXA
d+FiHwsUo/+PAv6JasI9qlE8dEI8lq4qI4jAZhwLsFYQFpe7hAkQgmIWjUt0m8vo
IWfdm9DzTlLz6z+uZtw6sxVJNu7FhnVjJAPeZO1pgaQER/x4hRQuZsZbSs/pbV9Z
k/zJweioYwfTnWtX8XtdY2isx7ts76cVUrtWOnxGi9Dczw/PlAmZl8KuSEn3M5ne
vgld8UV4bUdd/OTR9FdyL1Qia+KcKzaFAJvEmZ3AoO9iKqm6BhalQHudFrix5amJ
ZKMhiMqP
=UM+B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#75510; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 75510) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jan 2025 17:39:40 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jan 16 12:39:40 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34541 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1tYTqG-0000ZA-Aa
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2025 12:39:40 -0500
Received: from mail-ej1-x636.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::636]:49450)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <roman.scherer@HIDDEN>)
 id 1tYTqC-0000Yt-K6
 for 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2025 12:39:38 -0500
Received: by mail-ej1-x636.google.com with SMTP id
 a640c23a62f3a-ab2bb0822a4so236263166b.3
 for <75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 16 Jan 2025 09:39:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=burningswell-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1737049170;
 x=1737653970; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; 
 h=mime-version:message-id:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to
 :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=DQ93f2zUcVrM5xx+Byl6Cc3HitIUnMXbpEkk65gnEVU=;
 b=BShvR9eP4y0xl0xN51vodFPTdeZagy9pwiwLhEzVNiLAnR3yyk/7nfOQIPZlkLEZ3j
 CsL2QbQNCgxozngW2HTkDyVotwOMF+Bo0wmC/u4zuCUWxZxZCpfy37XAFCUpw7FMDcAG
 6N/5HA/pHIxSXF6bcnQtKtRzlDx+3zp0HPb74cvbcbvr99YUuBUi/qCI++E9jbwe207M
 bbUXCahqP08I5pi1EA767OzQ3yxjU+pOEDhdui9yQwgNjh+oy5NetljHYRbMKnuCKCNu
 7Yefmo2fLPxxfQ85J0ufygtit+FLjN7rgAvRf/voW1ToiyhkE2kbQDKRh0jFaaRvpAto
 NLpw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1737049170; x=1737653970;
 h=mime-version:message-id:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to
 :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date
 :message-id:reply-to;
 bh=DQ93f2zUcVrM5xx+Byl6Cc3HitIUnMXbpEkk65gnEVU=;
 b=VPzSCh/U+ocZdaQwEnBKW0k59JZaN9ocLeQnCXmzIy6Qr1gppqoHmjNTMN6xO1WB/L
 sCMd23XluU2Taq1Et3Z4pKabJn2ANAFS4yUlBVN+Zp0tV+AMzYgsVGeEUvUwon27IRfk
 MDEEgwg09c8/5GaFlK5lMUMXJwrUya9d4+o797XSXaWSQtBfQ41RqwIGrl27SmE/eU7d
 B4XXeOfU2Bc094UMdDCKlnpz+/W0yG74fiA/KapDSAocShnGzYyF3XV02kq07oZ3EDZc
 DscD+dkUGxYx1P2TUu5yhMCHb7/Y7YDVY2a3mX/r0ZqKxLl8esvkxDPRbE1mgWXYP78x
 YG5Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyEouj8FH5BZbT+ZtQbvpAnLLzANVcEFwtTGnCpr6sfSoWXtidq
 z0zfvYv6nw0cfq+8yXUhW3JwUqS9P6vxtnoGn4ER5mOq8LrCeB+Yh1/fhg9b1brbgOZtCOZAPRy
 TzB0=
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuv1JXgSkRyTEIkPdT18EjiWBCzmpkAWuT7ytSDrzYMOHKa3Ov6D4vJjMDDyEu
 70lKLxxS+iqGCsCdW1W6Kws4v+d0tCW0PhklGXrns5ii45Mtw+pfzyDbt2jVvz+a+IfCYvAVdey
 2XQB4hCJsHeda/18AlSUCJeInfhyTKFoW/yziYaWXMtgMm+pfQ3Wa/+ustNel3drv/D0gGfaBZY
 wCeV5PeUnauXjLUjEX29xUdnTzWAm8FSFr2UPWG1P1TyEbH0EaKsi7kNlHR
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE5+HUIRLgt2aM+cfdC1SeP195EqZky7bFSplamXTJHCQtXvqerw7voZ/gg7HLqIjOKdz1/eQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1196:b0:ab2:eb1a:9471 with SMTP id
 a640c23a62f3a-ab2eb1a9d1cmr2008456366b.48.1737049169678; 
 Thu, 16 Jan 2025 09:39:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from m1 ([2a01:599:11b:d164:8b54:e489:1ac3:a284])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 a640c23a62f3a-ab384f8627esm24603466b.153.2025.01.16.09.39.28
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Thu, 16 Jan 2025 09:39:29 -0800 (PST)
From: Roman Scherer <roman.scherer@HIDDEN>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#75510: Building grub-image.png.drv fails with rsvg
In-Reply-To: <73217a34a8baaa1c9e250df38c86591c3070411f75b7b61c084068d32480765f@HIDDEN>
 (Roman Scherer's message of "Mon, 13 Jan 2025 19:35:03 +0100")
References: <86bjwcs68x.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z4QmT1tGJj5hhvPu@HIDDEN>
 <Z4SGazuOKCWp6Z61@HIDDEN>
 <73217a34a8baaa1c9e250df38c86591c3070411f75b7b61c084068d32480765f@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.7; emacs 29.4
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:39:25 +0100
Message-ID: <86ed12vesy.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75510
Cc: 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

Roman Scherer <roman.scherer@HIDDEN> writes:

So, it looks like this issue might be related to:

- https://issues.guix.gnu.org/47853
- https://issues.guix.gnu.org/47115

I reconfigured my system now with --no-grafts, and this time it worked.

> <#secure method=pgpmime mode=sign>
>
> Hi Leo,
>
> here is the `guix desribe` run as my normal user account.
>
> ```
> [roman@m1 guix-home]$ guix describe
> Generation 305	Jan 12 2025 09:17:24	(current)
>   asahi 2a6f8b5
>     repository URL: https://github.com/asahi-guix/channel
>     branch: main
>     commit: 2a6f8b59d97a3451639f128ff1c53d9009897e45
>   guix 5d6c876
>     repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
>     branch: master
>     commit: 5d6c8767f67885bc9b2c8f18ab1f667d0065346b
>   nonguix 565d287
>     repository URL: https://gitlab.com/nonguix/nonguix
>     branch: master
>     commit: 565d287b7502ef9435b2fba38622d0a8f458677b
>   r0man-guix 9bb5571
>     repository URL: https://github.com/r0man/guix-channel
>     branch: main
>     commit: 9bb55710a8dc61a23c6cc4e8d2bcdc9503008492
> ```
>
> As this user I usually run the following command to reconfigure my
> system.
>
> ```
> sudo guix system reconfigure -L modules modules/r0man/guix/system/m1.scm
> -v 5
> ```
>
> I don't use the -i flag when reconfiguring. Is that problematic?
>
> So here's the guix describe I usually get when I'm reconfiguring my
> system:
>
> [roman@m1 guix-home]$ sudo guix describe
>   asahi 2a6f8b5
>     repository URL: https://github.com/asahi-guix/channel
>     branch: main
>     commit: 2a6f8b59d97a3451639f128ff1c53d9009897e45
>   guix 5d6c876
>     repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
>     branch: master
>     commit: 5d6c8767f67885bc9b2c8f18ab1f667d0065346b
>   nonguix 565d287
>     repository URL: https://gitlab.com/nonguix/nonguix
>     branch: master
>     commit: 565d287b7502ef9435b2fba38622d0a8f458677b
>   r0man-guix 9bb5571
>     repository URL: https://github.com/r0man/guix-channel
>     branch: main
>     commit: 9bb55710a8dc61a23c6cc4e8d2bcdc9503008492
>
> And this is the "guix describe" with the -i flag:
>
> [roman@m1 guix-home]$ sudo -i guix describe
>   guix 121e96d
>     repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
>     branch: master
>     commit: 121e96dca273ab407df11725da0026ee34abdf79
>
> Reconfiguring with the -i flag does not work, because I'm missing some
> modules from the channels that aren't listed there.
>
> I'm also linking my config, just in case:
>
> https://github.com/r0man/guix-home/blob/main/modules/r0man/guix/system/m1.scm
>
> Thanks for your help, Roman.
>
> Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> writes:
>
>> On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 03:30:07PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 10:58:54AM +0100, Roman Scherer wrote:
>>> >
>>> > I can't reconfigure my (aarch64) system anymore. When building
>>> > /gnu/store/bpda8gfvxm6iv3mc6n8sf3ydxc5b6zi9-grub-image.png.drv I see the following backtrace:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> > View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/bp/da8gfvxm6iv3mc6n8sf3ydxc5b6zi9-grub-image.png.drv.gz'.
>>>
>>> Can you share this log?
>>
>> Okay, thanks.
>>
>> Also, from the environment where you try to reconfigure, can you also
>> share the results of `guix describe`?
>>
>> What I mean by that is, for example, if you log in to the root account
>> to reconfigure, run `guix describe` from there.
>>
>> Another example: if you do `sudo -i guix system reconfigure [...]`, run
>> `sudo -i guix describe`.
>>
>> Does that make sense?

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQFTBAEBCAA9FiEE0iajOdjfRIFd3gygPdpSUn0qwZkFAmeJRE8fHHJvbWFuLnNj
aGVyZXJAYnVybmluZ3N3ZWxsLmNvbQAKCRA92lJSfSrBmV4SCAC1iVcDVzTk2ucw
d98W2IGg7l311dP5T/W4dRaxYaOtyXJU2XytJhpBu76VUbVnbQfyzduZJbcRt4Zu
/8mX7mQlhPSmD+J3IBKyA/fEBrbQMH2cmVOy46begc/PNH0u3dbgKIe0MsxkEPhe
eYerBCoq/zEJERoZkrNoK5GjJWVr2AeQPyThRs0b3vww2m3d8LviadiaZ9dRrcIV
0VRanDxeAWuorb8WQgFdxW9TtU0CYl6Ea+ju1jjZV9DipEKbFB8QKnj/c8MAXPXJ
L+5ZgtJ+vRkL4LUs7tHLwVg1eWKC9DkowTi/EcveHbPL/024NgNQEjdphVM3Vsry
l/SFiUqn
=BOLs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#75510; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 75510) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jan 2025 09:13:04 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 13 04:13:04 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50147 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1tXGVM-0003Hl-7M
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2025 04:13:04 -0500
Received: from mail-ej1-x62a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::62a]:54299)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <roman.scherer@HIDDEN>)
 id 1tXGVJ-0003HB-9s
 for 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2025 04:13:02 -0500
Received: by mail-ej1-x62a.google.com with SMTP id
 a640c23a62f3a-aaeecbb7309so754880566b.0
 for <75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:13:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=burningswell-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1736759574;
 x=1737364374; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; 
 h=mime-version:message-id:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to
 :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=Wzpy/JhKSqdcmj1QwKPUcClC+NNu4+W2K+wURWI8auc=;
 b=qpaeZ85PSQMcHvDGOwfbWmnAxsIQuK9cUSwPiug9XMjs4roeQoXYE7FrSCjNQhCV3c
 DbWKSQYmmsyc0Gnh6L3BAfryKFwVuPMD732ok7wIQMslcl6FczqO4PxNcIASM1c41NZT
 1i7sJD+BIlzkjpD6POeRH1k41l9+jerFpt66xAyOQIUd0DEG30rvgEIdUBP7/JJI/vp4
 d4EddHf/6pCdRUl4SR1bDXz0Hi2YKzgM1hQ2QfGukMnyT+VfOpxHkTVPKs367Oi/qYh/
 i6dI5TgvSjV1ZYihphLo8AxppbFGydZkeuEO5Ms1f5xkm2yptm69/hEa8KI7KSTTFfs/
 vlbA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1736759574; x=1737364374;
 h=mime-version:message-id:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to
 :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date
 :message-id:reply-to;
 bh=Wzpy/JhKSqdcmj1QwKPUcClC+NNu4+W2K+wURWI8auc=;
 b=TpYWsvTI6h5F7k/9YgPTRxogs2LFrGiP067dy9NKhRGJ4Zste9LrDejo5f0TUfp0Wf
 002vBgloEdnqQCxCTfJuPzFxiOUVkUOweQ5T8eMFjbA4T2AZNoxu8z/ftOIq7PZ2jIOz
 BQcuY/1gd2Bx6LzqNLVSLv7NpHlpC5ZuXvEJ/VMCn1hKnEerK4QU2Mpf6exw1LSMIKmr
 ZhGMunryAz7XNjxfNqXgqr/Gj0EuB7YPAtZNNvd/eCCR27j0oUgEhJRcjY7J0TZb4meA
 5Ji7TlWo8qavZQbVf+vJG10XoovvexfHEq/EpQJgkAREh714R8nX1t453GjUcNQ0X6xb
 mZ1Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyIELLvqq2yNTcShbBxWEyC4ObjiKjxcA2ly0f+oO8dLDae9c1r
 DhBRohuRjTfbw+9+R6Vvlnyntwbn5ipDFtTNl6gjZRaMN6jd9Go7FZIx/AyJuEExPTwnddKjTCE
 bWIg=
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncue752GJ7TeYMhVQKdKd8R5oMh2Y2AM/8N6j/QV/2uwn+ieZKt6nig2KEBPhos
 g6AksMvxNpw1dFnd1MkmgbN/iYGcnhNEv1Dfm0gsg2h+1AG90wKACPuGGi0OGYjGgwcGRjdMzfe
 z2ZHwyGVuO3UquiB5fqSqV9ntmj5AH1qqNDYyKRZZTxu0M6upRgceFvB9O7eA/W7SRdmihFd8as
 JL/OLlcCzAVkU8QZ7CDd9tbYxidk1b68qsKiSGNILQ7lRqWG8/jjgDt+pYl
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IELah7eAjTPuzejKrx7zXdlAqsKzd7gfbftk9ZyV9mzHGijHcdOzCbg7CoM84ava+JTrY3TBA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:948b:b0:aa6:6f92:74b1 with SMTP id
 a640c23a62f3a-ab2ab6fd565mr1660552066b.13.1736759573711; 
 Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:12:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from m1 ([2a01:599:105:2294:958e:9a47:b199:29d0])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 a640c23a62f3a-ab2c90da195sm472930866b.46.2025.01.13.01.12.52
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:12:53 -0800 (PST)
From: Roman Scherer <roman.scherer@HIDDEN>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#75510: Building grub-image.png.drv fails with rsvg
In-Reply-To: <Z4SGazuOKCWp6Z61@HIDDEN> (Leo Famulari's message of "Sun,
 12 Jan 2025 22:20:11 -0500")
References: <86bjwcs68x.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z4QmT1tGJj5hhvPu@HIDDEN>
 <Z4SGazuOKCWp6Z61@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.7; emacs 29.4
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 10:12:51 +0100
Message-ID: <86zfjv6prg.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75510
Cc: 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain


Hi Leo,

here is the `guix desribe` run as my normal user account.

```
[roman@m1 guix-home]$ guix describe
Generation 305	Jan 12 2025 09:17:24	(current)
  asahi 2a6f8b5
    repository URL: https://github.com/asahi-guix/channel
    branch: main
    commit: 2a6f8b59d97a3451639f128ff1c53d9009897e45
  guix 5d6c876
    repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
    branch: master
    commit: 5d6c8767f67885bc9b2c8f18ab1f667d0065346b
  nonguix 565d287
    repository URL: https://gitlab.com/nonguix/nonguix
    branch: master
    commit: 565d287b7502ef9435b2fba38622d0a8f458677b
  r0man-guix 9bb5571
    repository URL: https://github.com/r0man/guix-channel
    branch: main
    commit: 9bb55710a8dc61a23c6cc4e8d2bcdc9503008492
```

As this user I usually run the following command to reconfigure my
system.

```
sudo guix system reconfigure -L modules modules/r0man/guix/system/m1.scm
-v 5
```

I don't use the -i flag when reconfiguring. Is that problematic?

So here's the guix describe I usually get when I'm reconfiguring my
system:

[roman@m1 guix-home]$ sudo guix describe
  asahi 2a6f8b5
    repository URL: https://github.com/asahi-guix/channel
    branch: main
    commit: 2a6f8b59d97a3451639f128ff1c53d9009897e45
  guix 5d6c876
    repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
    branch: master
    commit: 5d6c8767f67885bc9b2c8f18ab1f667d0065346b
  nonguix 565d287
    repository URL: https://gitlab.com/nonguix/nonguix
    branch: master
    commit: 565d287b7502ef9435b2fba38622d0a8f458677b
  r0man-guix 9bb5571
    repository URL: https://github.com/r0man/guix-channel
    branch: main
    commit: 9bb55710a8dc61a23c6cc4e8d2bcdc9503008492

And this is the "guix describe" with the -i flag:

[roman@m1 guix-home]$ sudo -i guix describe
  guix 121e96d
    repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
    branch: master
    commit: 121e96dca273ab407df11725da0026ee34abdf79

Reconfiguring with the -i flag does not work, because I'm missing some
modules from the channels that aren't listed there.

I'm also linking my config, just in case:

https://github.com/r0man/guix-home/blob/main/modules/r0man/guix/system/m1.scm

Thanks for your help, Roman.

Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> writes:

> On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 03:30:07PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 10:58:54AM +0100, Roman Scherer wrote:
>> >
>> > I can't reconfigure my (aarch64) system anymore. When building
>> > /gnu/store/bpda8gfvxm6iv3mc6n8sf3ydxc5b6zi9-grub-image.png.drv I see the following backtrace:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> > View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/bp/da8gfvxm6iv3mc6n8sf3ydxc5b6zi9-grub-image.png.drv.gz'.
>>
>> Can you share this log?
>
> Okay, thanks.
>
> Also, from the environment where you try to reconfigure, can you also
> share the results of `guix describe`?
>
> What I mean by that is, for example, if you log in to the root account
> to reconfigure, run `guix describe` from there.
>
> Another example: if you do `sudo -i guix system reconfigure [...]`, run
> `sudo -i guix describe`.
>
> Does that make sense?

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQFTBAEBCAA9FiEE0iajOdjfRIFd3gygPdpSUn0qwZkFAmeE2RMfHHJvbWFuLnNj
aGVyZXJAYnVybmluZ3N3ZWxsLmNvbQAKCRA92lJSfSrBmQK/B/9/JcAVwlS5pxtR
si1OmkYPO7Ax8ywdaVFWnm6iKzNuVGrmA/89OzqDJOv7lJjyJYrz59TVQGrqPkhs
S4k2zks9iZVDic+Bif1votyB3olR7IiCxdXWQ0XS42si6ESxuNI1HalIGq3/imn7
PDzoVrD6UYtMprRmb+HfQM/dPNBxkHyNDR4dyLAbcIbLmytNVLPRLGodyJVPL7jW
1WPYyppPctSBSkiehTUB6yJhHVsDoeiPR87sH6Ft4tUb3pN2PqB5DhdTxd2cFmiJ
NmXgTwx5Hg+ClqR7TwbIFBASiOgp8uhIaKVUCpqGIByh6vzLAbP8lmpL+TzLbexK
tYILZXck
=U9Mp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#75510; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 75510) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jan 2025 03:20:23 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jan 12 22:20:23 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49707 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1tXB03-0001Xl-Bh
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2025 22:20:23 -0500
Received: from fhigh-b4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([202.12.124.155]:59091)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1tXAzz-0001Vg-T6
 for 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2025 22:20:21 -0500
Received: from phl-compute-12.internal (phl-compute-12.phl.internal
 [10.202.2.52])
 by mailfhigh.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18087254017F;
 Sun, 12 Jan 2025 22:20:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from phl-mailfrontend-02 ([10.202.2.163])
 by phl-compute-12.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 12 Jan 2025 22:20:14 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name;
 h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from
 :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
 :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=mesmtp; t=1736738413; x=
 1736824813; bh=ZDbuQ9AVd6N9oETz59tPYTxfgIKFKIj+UlCSbyOPkMc=; b=L
 mV1sOr8OSR7CFUXqoWMuFDZ1hhWwFgm16ep2Gydk06i2KesBo97iBvkda6xOh4VN
 aL4RAqsnaQ1OZtBn4VnBC1DQM7zyS0d4B37Kl5b6YtQQ8w2+pZwRq7OzKNQx5AT/
 GcgZZ9nb67nCCrWiQP3AX2pt+3aXZ2cpuFn5lm6u44=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date
 :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to
 :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to
 :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=
 1736738413; x=1736824813; bh=ZDbuQ9AVd6N9oETz59tPYTxfgIKFKIj+UlC
 SbyOPkMc=; b=fr8rsGgg2byQrF+Za5op4slNSo+eKYaIkEm0gtRMIwZMvpz/TC2
 bsuwfFskXS5pDGb5s7By5hPke9sApY7dFYfxJqroF/2onUdK4K73cxJCp6/9OkES
 S2KxsGP1q8OhZNxanaZ2Ipafi94S9WTFis2/xekv4Eht1hw5YcOiD99LjvfezbeF
 rXBl4WhdYfF3krvuLB9r1ks9d74ufbRusCVOLwDGBzrfgXjQ3PTYJdFqxej1UfCC
 Q2ar3TmLIQdHtLzmGxQYXPEwHUfeaKnuELn71S9P1II/VTjSUDAUDGCohBc3p3KN
 GZg+N6swRim6NAfb44BEph2cbzsQd/H+U0Q==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:bYaEZ_FjSE565UST5ZYx6jhc7M3rO9X1Yx9XW2NOSBAas8L-KmHH3g>
 <xme:bYaEZ8Uvv8brBCFAuUSpqGjqSPkzu3ZwNTN_C6ntGpFmaWc7z2SQ96J6LSTXycvz5
 _MaN1NFTYm4yPamXg>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:bYaEZxKtTjuZbGHVhqz6dPNMaN25hK_Ela5ZfQKVL5dKSPBbcmSsosB-UopDTB-eznYqbJtC_O2Bd7LxxxvT6dch>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefuddrudehfedgheeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf
 fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfu
 rfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnh
 htshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepfffhvfevuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvden
 ucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcuhfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrg
 hmvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepieetudehfeekueefleegudfhjefgleehfeeluefh
 feffgfeuudelhedvjeelieetnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpe
 hmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgdpnhgspghrtghpthht
 ohepvddpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtoheprhhomhgrnhdrshgthhgvrh
 gvrhessghurhhnihhnghhsfigvlhhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepjeehhedutdesuggv
 sggsuhhgshdrghhnuhdrohhrgh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:bYaEZ9FIeV0F_gPLM345IwzesCa8JkMV6rfJRNFf0vagqDCnJFbL7A>
 <xmx:bYaEZ1WL_14xySq6XAiIq_vpuEvj31Hu-mgauxCbNDZALt_fXrvOcg>
 <xmx:bYaEZ4NNP7N-lTRmcFbSqh5bAXQyC60Nenpa1TY7M_P17ut7MAS5AA>
 <xmx:bYaEZ01E-bINVhWj6MdGk0_7mktNfrqUTQAn3KHKeh7G5HFhYYoSFA>
 <xmx:bYaEZyjOjqGsd1zsUC-aIM5XYOTHEwmIWxi7jZWaqhX38jD489LLaS-L>
Feedback-ID: i819c4023:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun,
 12 Jan 2025 22:20:13 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 22:20:11 -0500
From: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
To: Roman Scherer <roman.scherer@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#75510: Building grub-image.png.drv fails with rsvg
Message-ID: <Z4SGazuOKCWp6Z61@HIDDEN>
References: <86bjwcs68x.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <Z4QmT1tGJj5hhvPu@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Z4QmT1tGJj5hhvPu@HIDDEN>
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75510
Cc: 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)

On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 03:30:07PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 10:58:54AM +0100, Roman Scherer wrote:
> > 
> > I can't reconfigure my (aarch64) system anymore. When building
> > /gnu/store/bpda8gfvxm6iv3mc6n8sf3ydxc5b6zi9-grub-image.png.drv I see the following backtrace:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/bp/da8gfvxm6iv3mc6n8sf3ydxc5b6zi9-grub-image.png.drv.gz'.
> 
> Can you share this log?

Okay, thanks.

Also, from the environment where you try to reconfigure, can you also
share the results of `guix describe`?

What I mean by that is, for example, if you log in to the root account
to reconfigure, run `guix describe` from there.

Another example: if you do `sudo -i guix system reconfigure [...]`, run
`sudo -i guix describe`.

Does that make sense?




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#75510; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 75510) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jan 2025 22:12:49 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jan 12 17:12:49 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49378 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1tX6CP-0001kr-BA
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2025 17:12:49 -0500
Received: from mail-ed1-x536.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::536]:43292)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <roman.scherer@HIDDEN>)
 id 1tX6CM-0001ka-Hy
 for 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2025 17:12:47 -0500
Received: by mail-ed1-x536.google.com with SMTP id
 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5d3f57582a2so9350379a12.1
 for <75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 12 Jan 2025 14:12:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=burningswell-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1736719959;
 x=1737324759; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; 
 h=mime-version:message-id:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to
 :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=/M5t57uJD5bEQazj/0LzDV+88KZCqMM4DGuk7jDgXB4=;
 b=uAf4ZQNyn401DsW578RgR8BNwH02wsdFEG3XYh45J4/j1TfmK0MPGGRBlJuIqluEPY
 HvnbEs9mcTgA7qufOIZeXw15BVk6oWXF+fLHf5buQq2tk4cn/11TZtgrjiabdu6arucp
 yxohIgWCT8N8LkRf88I7frzSwDYVGD3t/u80IH63QuIMyjafI7c6qB7HuZaS2A0iLllC
 VeM0RbcC1xUQ6eY1GSb3WIxbVvNc4RMBIUnYC9aq3u2jibfbZ0eUWhtBiA3mrtM2XivK
 nx8wz4FU1Gb/n/QRzV6+j6Q9SEVp0Rp74mjM2OyciOz3Q9wG3SyGaABRO9Z5zNtEymJ0
 6L7A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1736719959; x=1737324759;
 h=mime-version:message-id:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to
 :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date
 :message-id:reply-to;
 bh=/M5t57uJD5bEQazj/0LzDV+88KZCqMM4DGuk7jDgXB4=;
 b=Foctz82BzHum3JYx7co9voCr7QZ8c5jEo+pDhe+pgtmhIilXrS3z9/5DF+nrYJE1Ch
 /qVtalNK/P/Y/u+97kqL25FFVl5FCFjZMv/Jwf8E7/uLRIW1VPfC3ZHXwHiaieAwH4Ix
 +S6JvgyPYacebLUQdYd+6vwpb4cNE+IbfusVBwOucmjU1NRvmQ/5ndTA1xXVvxHLSMa/
 0P+leqF3k0RBmFWSieZEcjNPT0rkRxBUNl8PqiBCp0GPzeUfLOAomONiRPELYI3DmL8P
 /FY+cK+Kg/Kp4MvKcr3Pa/S40tMaDRMD6MqBiGos+Gj6rVWFESYFw6jlMi6qvDZCkPQQ
 WVGA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxUENsHjCBu42/c/TnZ3LzbFZ+GnV4Vzfr2s3L14pRUh6n3/kNO
 AvAp9WzOBkHt6s2x4u+y8Z4eLMkA4jECakYEX134wtDBN0USAlvJDw6qp68LleCgcmCuyIc63nc
 NowQ=
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncusgzTlStTG04FZ2N0Qi8HZohjGyZaYmfyBiuIDaAdhg3k3xUEX7cBva/5V/Ce
 acDX+5YlBP1woaaaYlVfGgGUWXehG5Wln/mtycOUNnW8DPZbeAjB98fRQXJf5TgKpkqCDIfBp/B
 sVXUjS3MWBZhx7ScCik2Vqrw2JJO00zRAPbuua+30Ztjzf3fAV+yo3eUFRC9fwNizAHSiF4Qert
 JmXV9SbVgBKQtAGf+LiEBenQJd8eicKvppBUqe7FW5Bj0O+3us4A6apJoeL
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH99IdflBEdfHA95xKT2aYv7Cu5pjkOU1eA/pXgdS9XzXOy3ZjBsXdKyVy9rHtQMAq5Dk3IAQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:4305:b0:5d3:e9fd:9a16 with SMTP id
 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5d98627df9amr12935062a12.12.1736719959371; 
 Sun, 12 Jan 2025 14:12:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from m1 ([2a01:599:105:2294:958e:9a47:b199:29d0])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5d9904a411csm4123317a12.72.2025.01.12.14.12.38
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Sun, 12 Jan 2025 14:12:38 -0800 (PST)
From: Roman Scherer <roman.scherer@HIDDEN>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#75510: Building grub-image.png.drv fails with rsvg
In-Reply-To: <Z4QmT1tGJj5hhvPu@HIDDEN> (Leo Famulari's message of "Sun,
 12 Jan 2025 15:30:07 -0500")
References: <86bjwcs68x.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z4QmT1tGJj5hhvPu@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.7; emacs 29.4
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:12:37 +0100
Message-ID: <865xmj8ywa.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75510
Cc: 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> writes:

Hi Leo,

the log only contains the backtrace from my previous mail, it is this:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Backtrace:
           2 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/3rcg4ann6607iqsh1aj84cqdnw8?")
In gnu/build/svg.scm:
     53:6  1 (svg->png "/gnu/store/41841pid2mmsvar44vy9xafsrf3cyb9i?" ?)
In unknown file:
           0 (rsvg-handle-render-cairo #<rsvg-handle fffff770ae60> #)

ERROR: In procedure rsvg-handle-render-cairo:
Wrong type (expecting finalized smob): #<cairo-context fffff770ad90>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Roman

> On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 10:58:54AM +0100, Roman Scherer wrote:
>>
>> I can't reconfigure my (aarch64) system anymore. When building
>> /gnu/store/bpda8gfvxm6iv3mc6n8sf3ydxc5b6zi9-grub-image.png.drv I see the following backtrace:
>
> [...]
>
>> View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/bp/da8gfvxm6iv3mc6n8sf3ydxc5b6zi9-grub-image.png.drv.gz'.
>
> Can you share this log?

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQFTBAEBCAA9FiEE0iajOdjfRIFd3gygPdpSUn0qwZkFAmeEPlUfHHJvbWFuLnNj
aGVyZXJAYnVybmluZ3N3ZWxsLmNvbQAKCRA92lJSfSrBmZJ8B/9Z1Ua5YeNsZmbe
k4UhvZ61iBiKQ2FQkDDd/PWMuJCPRjhclfxbm40gtpGgX1ozyLp4DhWBzaikV7Cu
jAacOPiv46aY+gQsUJoWBakpghLjxXp4aH2Bm6tX7wATXtqgZ7cw/zV2gYIrhftt
KBBCcV6PiezB0D1uenzvlmoxG5HLI36M9JngIVcXImjk9iUwTIDyVu18gbabsPbd
3wbP2yYSLsYjm1p3M7DEiFD2Y1m23xfPYC0QAWikog9MkZijpsCoE+Y2Frl6YubQ
UC9sdxcS7ZVihf8oWGRwVD0Id1jh/4SfLh5vk/U3zcjEizW1mtMvGqtZUJXUDjSp
6PXI5aeh
=Vzo1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#75510; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 75510) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jan 2025 20:30:18 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jan 12 15:30:18 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49271 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1tX4bC-0005je-0K
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2025 15:30:18 -0500
Received: from fhigh-b8-smtp.messagingengine.com ([202.12.124.159]:44617)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1tX4b9-0005jB-Dq
 for 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2025 15:30:16 -0500
Received: from phl-compute-04.internal (phl-compute-04.phl.internal
 [10.202.2.44])
 by mailfhigh.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id F04532540140;
 Sun, 12 Jan 2025 15:30:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from phl-mailfrontend-01 ([10.202.2.162])
 by phl-compute-04.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 12 Jan 2025 15:30:10 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name;
 h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from
 :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
 :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=mesmtp; t=1736713809; x=
 1736800209; bh=ioXIMvkT6SkkW/rcrOV4aswaOt40EihCtHN+7Y4d9zs=; b=i
 ay70Fj83vIed4DYW1/7BSKqWTvOrsje6D0oqYvnu6kM6QX1jfeVDp21KAXbSQ+3k
 Qt3p/lXFcYn20K1/SdXsiol/2aRESHkpnbpYVsDgShKKXPeQfLe4fuj9jZOFleX7
 JJIPpClZMoOYlBlbnDwIpNw9yKdsaPMZmcaZ4Js9Mc=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date
 :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to
 :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to
 :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=
 1736713809; x=1736800209; bh=ioXIMvkT6SkkW/rcrOV4aswaOt40EihCtHN
 +7Y4d9zs=; b=nQ430ofowK+y38apzc0SdysFmIOuSy9Jj4mRoMWCUfUyEkRBbGz
 ZN2NtCBQGuMTfpEgsD3x6ftHYejj3Lx9QrZF7h1PWX2dLmGMw8k4P1QCsGIgHcCn
 /WOl16ytUIsD1L3n/z8owpnJd79/rIHKSEe2D+h6eQ6oqxxmfFxEBaBoMl+D6TcK
 k4SAGcxx24Q/HmOVSk35Quq1Q8yoiAOzQsZHD8gKY2Em8iBuVFRORL0KbKwuz6Em
 5Ik78gvANJAFKq2WIAd2FwqW8XfF26+esLGPpE2B+JvzRHQ9dnf5dwAzQBLEA46h
 ezEhqTMLpCB3PsbYmj5ZbaT0er8HZMyzg+Q==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:USaEZ0ukhQlqhmvTEYk91yL-44xZYRQPTI8AlxEZ_Frw4LHpzpueGw>
 <xme:USaEZxdynOZ0jbgEAkxgi_4dS3Za-TVAtrjQn1RKMPSbRzTAP_cCPy6XrERiXWLoD
 OyxVxvuThEdao-law>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:USaEZ_yVsdVD3ldlnL1C1WsOsCPuxeUpEvfe_PYvTIyUQxvyrTf-57875AgLlGOv8sCvnGNgj8zVJ3pAo0uKP58u>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefuddrudehvddgudefjecutefuodetggdotefrod
 ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdp
 uffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivg
 hnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvvefukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertddttddv
 necuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnh
 grmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeiteduheefkeeufeelgeduhfejgfelheefleeu
 hfeffffgueduleehvdejleeiteenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmh
 epmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvpdhnsggprhgtphht
 thhopedvpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehrohhmrghnrdhstghhvg
 hrvghrsegsuhhrnhhinhhgshifvghllhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopeejheehuddtsegu
 vggssghughhsrdhgnhhurdhorhhg
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:USaEZ3OwkJrkEXUXx0Si_geRxv4Inr5sOckwTcr0QhApWGpP4JjsTg>
 <xmx:USaEZ083am6CdarCXXOns4Zw7il7WcVVO7f6dmZAWuhsBPOoJD5ETg>
 <xmx:USaEZ_UipXDPc93rIs9kGv7TAZ2OIDA8VTG5dtDI_2DuckwkjpbdVQ>
 <xmx:USaEZ9eRMXbl-4prJuBPSNmuPsW9wsX6j-ik9zPGT4dP2OuBPuQTsg>
 <xmx:USaEZ2I_QQDKC2jbIUpLchs6z1rrk9LAirpyVKm9AV7BrVkPWOL7WMVC>
Feedback-ID: i819c4023:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun,
 12 Jan 2025 15:30:08 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 15:30:07 -0500
From: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
To: Roman Scherer <roman.scherer@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#75510: Building grub-image.png.drv fails with rsvg
Message-ID: <Z4QmT1tGJj5hhvPu@HIDDEN>
References: <86bjwcs68x.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <86bjwcs68x.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75510
Cc: 75510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)

On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 10:58:54AM +0100, Roman Scherer wrote:
> 
> I can't reconfigure my (aarch64) system anymore. When building
> /gnu/store/bpda8gfvxm6iv3mc6n8sf3ydxc5b6zi9-grub-image.png.drv I see the following backtrace:

[...]

> View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/bp/da8gfvxm6iv3mc6n8sf3ydxc5b6zi9-grub-image.png.drv.gz'.

Can you share this log?




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#75510; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jan 2025 09:59:10 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jan 12 04:59:10 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46170 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1tWukQ-00015l-4F
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2025 04:59:10 -0500
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:58338)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <roman.scherer@HIDDEN>)
 id 1tWukN-00015V-Ig
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2025 04:59:07 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <roman.scherer@HIDDEN>)
 id 1tWukI-0004qh-0p
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Sun, 12 Jan 2025 04:59:02 -0500
Received: from mail-ej1-x62e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::62e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <roman.scherer@HIDDEN>)
 id 1tWukF-0002Ek-Kb
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Sun, 12 Jan 2025 04:59:01 -0500
Received: by mail-ej1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id
 a640c23a62f3a-ab2bb0822a4so697796166b.3
 for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Sun, 12 Jan 2025 01:58:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=burningswell-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1736675937;
 x=1737280737; darn=gnu.org; 
 h=mime-version:message-id:date:user-agent:subject:to:from:from:to:cc
 :subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=K8FDBn62cGpNJQeDy2QWpwVRXxWxUjpmHNfkyINjpOU=;
 b=fGjk+amaDxUjXr1CZIdYPoYSu6GCU6g3U1pJ52+luNJ+XUF+ys5Vfg3hTCDNsMdKQv
 cd18PEXOzrwibsAz16Cyf0rh+TEW1jLEIroPsRHcTmnh3EKdx9GtlGfCsijD+T2QIWNu
 5JUFbrY87jlVULbhq3jWBrecQWA/HJcSvy6o3N65rXtrdi/qRJgYXMd3ywtXBOD5ig8a
 b+m2HO9sZrMSVaaq23//GagsB3HQzszrAG0IdkbRYs380VjeU8dBZ+VB4QRPFAeXARNU
 5W0nkEr7IuIHI1McVIDG0BvF0NvlOSw/3hJ4ZD/Arf7jD9dj4VYD5BuHvSmtH4jc+o3h
 Qm4g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1736675937; x=1737280737;
 h=mime-version:message-id:date:user-agent:subject:to:from
 :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=K8FDBn62cGpNJQeDy2QWpwVRXxWxUjpmHNfkyINjpOU=;
 b=g/N5b/dQg3V1uqAPVd4oyK7xWj4EM8gXQBx1XyFIWvLanMan6G8vcLfzBniu7EoEUB
 wrexJnz+wYlXf4zU1BRTPWlZNim2WWeRGyuMGB1EV6Rs2GpybhFgKZItOViN/Or1On07
 wySUQBN8OiFafICmIpiCgVahRV0RdOBgP41VFDjRS+4qB5+5yMC/tvNFgUO2PEU16STG
 7Ey6lkll1rmDOS4UxuZZZGcNOZeSU+x/ueVNnDe99u6hFYCKJO3wD8jiE6QhEO4P2sKU
 UGR49bbU0H2FEPENPksugJXq/xExKFRwFNvcocB3B8d4qVIOeF3xnKTiUwmDiAlBnfH5
 UyTQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw6BR79fdIoCDuc9x3V4Z+Uf1J7dYxm/cwjDCrPmlo2uTEmkGYY
 Rcw04OfMSCWi+Dp3emBhJ46foJqxL59Smlcl1iO1p1/jGzKFeqGQHckwolvYwmEuM1JayZd11cm
 7yFw=
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncunNX2KCmHsEujbJCJw6gXehr3ic1l82Th0WAep2kqMc/YEAeimllYpZ9d6gdj
 R5yvQKdY1PzrkXwumZdWzeR0GOgrbBPxUKOpLlwQJ0c4vqEKhUAQfweDF2CMQN6IsSqKCKgFQAk
 p4yS6rx3+4YEhCVbutU8xHOJy/Wotc5r0cTEaWrHFh63G0+WKvQm6kuZOBtOuPo1m9ixyVatRUn
 j7IMSqPc6xqRhXqFY/ngQNBBFwYqJxwIuxEhybJLISSqYvvFkYK1KBHw7SW
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFSh9Tsf6GTKoP54XXr/qoIwVPP9RfHFdROH3q6F6lwESqISVTL5RhMWsNTwJ6E3DhSfgpZXQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2990:b0:ab2:ea29:b6 with SMTP id
 a640c23a62f3a-ab2ea2905d2mr624436966b.35.1736675936578; 
 Sun, 12 Jan 2025 01:58:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from m1 ([2a01:599:105:2294:958e:9a47:b199:29d0])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 a640c23a62f3a-ab2c964dc9dsm359680366b.178.2025.01.12.01.58.55
 for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Sun, 12 Jan 2025 01:58:55 -0800 (PST)
From: Roman Scherer <roman.scherer@HIDDEN>
To: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Subject: Building grub-image.png.drv fails with rsvg
User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.7; emacs 29.4
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:58:54 +0100
Message-ID: <86bjwcs68x.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Received-SPF: none client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::62e;
 envelope-from=roman.scherer@HIDDEN; helo=mail-ej1-x62e.google.com
X-Spam_score_int: -18
X-Spam_score: -1.9
X-Spam_bar: -
X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain


Hello Guix,

I can't reconfigure my (aarch64) system anymore. When building
/gnu/store/bpda8gfvxm6iv3mc6n8sf3ydxc5b6zi9-grub-image.png.drv I see the following backtrace:

```
building /gnu/store/bpda8gfvxm6iv3mc6n8sf3ydxc5b6zi9-grub-image.png.drv...
Backtrace:
           2 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/3rcg4ann6607iqsh1aj84cqdnw8?")
In gnu/build/svg.scm:
     53:6  1 (svg->png "/gnu/store/41841pid2mmsvar44vy9xafsrf3cyb9i?" ?)
In unknown file:
           0 (rsvg-handle-render-cairo #<rsvg-handle fffff770ae60> #)

ERROR: In procedure rsvg-handle-render-cairo:
Wrong type (expecting finalized smob): #<cairo-context fffff770ad90>
builder for `/gnu/store/bpda8gfvxm6iv3mc6n8sf3ydxc5b6zi9-grub-image.png.drv' failed with exit code 1
build of /gnu/store/bpda8gfvxm6iv3mc6n8sf3ydxc5b6zi9-grub-image.png.drv failed
View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/bp/da8gfvxm6iv3mc6n8sf3ydxc5b6zi9-grub-image.png.drv.gz'.
applying 4 grafts for asahi-scripts-20240623 ...
cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/mnavmxm513zwy16m1lyz2yppdgjbam3l-grub.cfg.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
guix system: error: build of `/gnu/store/mnavmxm513zwy16m1lyz2yppdgjbam3l-grub.cfg.drv' failed
```

Any ideas how to fix this?

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQFTBAEBCAA9FiEE0iajOdjfRIFd3gygPdpSUn0qwZkFAmeDkl4fHHJvbWFuLnNj
aGVyZXJAYnVybmluZ3N3ZWxsLmNvbQAKCRA92lJSfSrBmQgcB/474csTCqGn8JEQ
Q6AtPYYLZA6CbAAA8C6fm677GH6lSxflZKEqlLSeLb18vSUW8y+zb11aYMNLBFtn
BI5Uia60rsRk8GGs7LetsuewjYknrdZLnNYc4Ebq70WTDGvrZK8mlqvmrXVNkgAT
+GVJGVb/cJmYUHJZAkunzMMPuiCBRScvOUSwzDhZEQeY3tcfirkkz7irlzNIrwUi
FeSd3XEo1hQaLLSJQL72BYZSdCiDMvWf7c/6iJ2JvHeMxWJsfx4M2AoX9+w2hCog
hZcICibESOuu0ENAhHprgHayZGfkBQjM1CcpyNbbLqny5UMh54PhG8W1sRrLB2TT
AQEeruve
=426t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--




Acknowledgement sent to Roman Scherer <roman.scherer@HIDDEN>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN. Full text available.
Report forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#75510; Package guix. Full text available.
Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.
Last modified: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 22:15:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.