GNU logs - #75658, boring messages

Message sent to janneke@HIDDEN, samplet@HIDDEN, bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#75658: Non-deterministic Gash error in =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98gcc-mesboot-4.9.4=E2=80=99?=
Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludovic.courtes@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: janneke@HIDDEN, samplet@HIDDEN, bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 22:09:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.75658.B.173723810610127 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 75658 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN>, Timothy Sample <samplet@HIDDEN>
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludovic.courtes@HIDDEN>
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 23:08:09 +0100
Message-ID: <87msfnsrli.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=192.134.164.83;
 envelope-from=ludovic.courtes@HIDDEN;
 helo=mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr
X-Spam_score_int: -43
X-Spam_score: -4.4
X-Spam_bar: ----
X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Hello,

I stumbled upon this interesting non-deterministic failure while
building =E2=80=98gcc-mesboot-4.9.4.drv=E2=80=99 on current =E2=80=98core-p=
ackages-team=E2=80=99 (which
is unchanged compared to =E2=80=98master=E2=80=99):

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
source directory: "/tmp/guix-build-gcc-mesboot-4.9.4.drv-0/gcc-4.9.4" (rela=
tive from build: ".")
build directory: "/tmp/guix-build-gcc-mesboot-4.9.4.drv-0/gcc-4.9.4"
configure flags: ("CONFIG_SHELL=3D/gnu/store/bhmkf29xki04mmydpm0axpbh35md4v=
fb-gash-boot-0.3.0/bin/bash" "SHELL=3D/gnu/store/bhmkf29xki04mmydpm0axpbh35=
md4vfb-gash-boot-0.3.0/bin/bash" "--prefix=3D/gnu/store/mgbd56zvid129vkk8l9=
zir7pf46r5038-gcc-mesboot-4.9.4" "--enable-fast-install" "--build=3Dx86_64-=
unknown-linux-gnu" "--prefix=3D/gnu/store/mgbd56zvid129vkk8l9zir7pf46r5038-=
gcc-mesboot-4.9.4" "--build=3Di686-unknown-linux-gnu" "--host=3Di686-unknow=
n-linux-gnu" "--with-host-libstdcxx=3D-lsupc++" "--with-native-system-heade=
r-dir=3D/gnu/store/qxp7icgwbn1hqqwvkan7aljgzfn439zh-glibc-mesboot-2.16.0/in=
clude" "--with-build-sysroot=3D/gnu/store/qxp7icgwbn1hqqwvkan7aljgzfn439zh-=
glibc-mesboot-2.16.0/include" "--disable-bootstrap" "--disable-decimal-floa=
t" "--disable-libatomic" "--disable-libcilkrts" "--disable-libgomp" "--disa=
ble-libitm" "--disable-libmudflap" "--disable-libquadmath" "--disable-libsa=
nitizer" "--disable-libssp" "--disable-libvtv" "--disable-lto" "--disable-l=
to-plugin" "--disable-multilib" "--disable-plugin" "--disable-threads" "--e=
nable-languages=3Dc,c++" "--enable-static" "--enable-shared" "--enable-thre=
ads=3Dsingle" "--disable-libstdcxx-pch" "--disable-build-with-cxx")
Backtrace:
In gash/eval.scm:
 221: 19 [eval-sh (<sh-set!> ("ac_useropt" (<sh-cmd-sub> #)))]
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
 642: 18 [for-each #<procedure 1502320 at gash/eval.scm:221:17 (name word)>=
 # #]
In gash/eval.scm:
 222: 17 [#<procedure 1502320 at gash/eval.scm:221:17 (name word)> "ac_user=
opt" #]
 131: 16 [eval-word (<sh-cmd-sub> (<sh-pipeline> # #)) #:output string ...]
 121: 15 [expand-word (<sh-cmd-sub> (<sh-pipeline> # #)) #:output string ..=
.]
In gash/shell.scm:
 289: 14 [sh:substitute-command #<procedure 15022a0 at gash/eval.scm:129:35=
 ()>]
 270: 13 [%subshell #<procedure v ()>]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
 157: 12 [catch quit #<procedure v ()> ...]
In ice-9/r4rs.scm:
 176: 11 [with-output-to-port #<variable 13a02e0 value: #<output: file 39>>=
 ...]
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
 619: 10 [for-each #<procedure eval-sh (exp)> ((<sh-pipeline> # #))]
In gash/shell.scm:
 344: 9 [sh:pipeline #<procedure 1506f40 at gash/eval.scm:149:6 ()> ...]
 310: 8 [plumb #<input: #{read pipe}# 36> #f ...]
 270: 7 [%subshell #<procedure thunk* ()>]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
 157: 6 [catch quit #<procedure thunk* ()> ...]
In gash/shell.scm:
 316: 5 [thunk*]
 129: 4 [sh:exec-let () "sed" "s/[-+.]/_/g"]
  92: 3 [exec-utility () ...]
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
 616: 2 [for-each #<procedure ec3b20 at gash/shell.scm:70:12 (i)> (0 1 2 ..=
.)]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
1473: 1 [dup->port #<input: file 38> "r" 7]
In unknown file:
   ?: 0 [fdopen 7 "r"]

ERROR: In procedure fdopen:
ERROR: In procedure scm_fdes_to_port: Bad file descriptor
Backtrace:
In gash/eval.scm:
 221: 19 [eval-sh (<sh-set!> ("ac_useropt" (<sh-cmd-sub> #)))]
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
 642: 18 [for-each #<procedure 1502320 at gash/eval.scm:221:17 (name word)>=
 # #]
In gash/eval.scm:
 222: 17 [#<procedure 1502320 at gash/eval.scm:221:17 (name word)> "ac_user=
opt" #]
 131: 16 [eval-word (<sh-cmd-sub> (<sh-pipeline> # #)) #:output string ...]
 121: 15 [expand-word (<sh-cmd-sub> (<sh-pipeline> # #)) #:output string ..=
.]
In gash/shell.scm:
 289: 14 [sh:substitute-command #<procedure 15022a0 at gash/eval.scm:129:35=
 ()>]
 270: 13 [%subshell #<procedure v ()>]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
 157: 12 [catch quit #<procedure v ()> ...]
In ice-9/r4rs.scm:
 176: 11 [with-output-to-port #<variable 13a02e0 value: #<output: file 39>>=
 ...]
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
 619: 10 [for-each #<procedure eval-sh (exp)> ((<sh-pipeline> # #))]
In gash/shell.scm:
 347: 9 [sh:pipeline #<procedure 1506f40 at gash/eval.scm:149:6 ()> ...]
 310: 8 [plumb #f #<output: #{write pipe}# 38> ...]
 270: 7 [%subshell #<procedure thunk* ()>]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
 157: 6 [catch quit #<procedure thunk* ()> ...]
In gash/shell.scm:
 316: 5 [thunk*]
 129: 4 [sh:exec-let () "printf" "%s\\n" "libsanitizer"]
  92: 3 [exec-utility () ...]
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
 616: 2 [for-each #<procedure ec3b20 at gash/shell.scm:70:12 (i)> (0 1 2 ..=
.)]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
1473: 1 [dup->port #<input: file 36> "r" 7]
In unknown file:
   ?: 0 [fdopen 7 "r"]

ERROR: In procedure fdopen:
ERROR: In procedure scm_fdes_to_port: Bad file descriptor
checking build system type... i686-unknown-linux-gnu
checking host system type... i686-unknown-linux-gnu
checking target system type... i686-unknown-linux-gnu
checking for a BSD-compatible install... ./install-sh -c
checking whether ln works... yes
checking whether ln -s works... yes
checking for a sed that does not truncate output... /gnu/store/i61mvrw30k8n=
g8hxym8s180nydnsbji6-gash-utils-boot-0.2.0/bin/sed
checking for gawk... gawk
checking for libsanitizer support... yes
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

What happens is that Gash crashes in the middle of a substitution on
$ac_useropt.  As a result, =E2=80=98--disable-libsanitizer=E2=80=99 (and ot=
her options,
it seems) are discarded, hence the =E2=80=9Clibsanitizer support... yes=E2=
=80=9D line.
Hours later, build fails while trying to build libsanitizer.

Any idea what could cause EBADF?

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludovic.courtes@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#75658: Acknowledgement (Non-deterministic Gash error in
 =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98gcc-mesboot-4.9.4=E2=80=99?=)
Message-ID: <handler.75658.B.173723810610127.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <87msfnsrli.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 75658
X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix
Reply-To: 75658 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 22:09:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

As you requested using X-Debbugs-CC, your message was also forwarded to
  Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN>, Timothy Sample <samplet@HIDDEN=
m>
(after having been given a bug report number, if it did not have one).

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-guix@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 75658 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
75658: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D75658
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#75658: Non-deterministic Gash error in =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98gcc-mesboot-4.9.4=E2=80=99?=
Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2025 18:25:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.75658.B75658.17373110926843 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 75658 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Timothy Sample <samplet@HIDDEN>, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN>
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87msfnsrli.fsf@HIDDEN> ("Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?="'s message of "Sat, 18 Jan 2025 23:08:09 +0100")
References: <87msfnsrli.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2025 19:24:25 +0100
Message-ID: <87wmeqpspy.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludovic.courtes@HIDDEN> skribis:

> I stumbled upon this interesting non-deterministic failure while
> building =E2=80=98gcc-mesboot-4.9.4.drv=E2=80=99 on current =E2=80=98core=
-packages-team=E2=80=99 (which
> is unchanged compared to =E2=80=98master=E2=80=99):

Just got another one:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
checking for struct sigaction.sa_sigaction... yes
checking for volatile sig_atomic_t... yes
checking for sighandler_t... yes
checking for sigprocmask... (cached) yes
checking whether sleep is declared... yes
checking for working sleep... yes
checking for socklen_t... Backtrace:
In gash/shell.scm:
 129: 19 [sh:exec-let () "ac_fn_c_try_compile" "2817"]
In gash/environment.scm:
 215: 18 [save-variables-excursion () ...]
 292: 17 [with-arguments # #<procedure 2210f00 at gash/shell.scm:145:25 ()>]
 389: 16 [call-with-return #<procedure 2210e40 at gash/shell.scm:147:28 ()>]
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
 619: 15 [for-each #<procedure eval-sh (exp)> ((<sh-begin> # # # ...))]
 619: 14 [for-each #<procedure eval-sh (exp)> (# # # # ...)]
In gash/shell.scm:
 441: 13 [sh:cond # #]
  55: 12 [without-errexit #<procedure 13185e0 at gash/eval.scm:149:6 ()>]
 372: 11 [sh:and #<procedure 1318560 at gash/eval.scm:149:6 ()> ...]
  55: 10 [without-errexit #<procedure 1318560 at gash/eval.scm:149:6 ()>]
 372: 9 [sh:and #<procedure 1318500 at gash/eval.scm:149:6 ()> ...]
  55: 8 [without-errexit #<procedure 1318500 at gash/eval.scm:149:6 ()>]
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
 616: 7 [for-each #<procedure eval-sh (exp)> (# # # # ...)]
 619: 6 [for-each #<procedure eval-sh (exp)> (# # #)]
In gash/shell.scm:
 245: 5 [#<procedure 1f63030 at gash/shell.scm:239:17 ()>]
 129: 4 [sh:exec-let () "grep" "-v" "^ *+" "conftest.err"]
  92: 3 [exec-utility () ...]
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
 616: 2 [for-each #<procedure ea9a60 at gash/shell.scm:70:12 (i)> (0 1 2 ..=
.)]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
1473: 1 [dup->port #<input: file 20> "r" 7]
In unknown file:
   ?: 0 [fdopen 7 "r"]

ERROR: In procedure fdopen:
ERROR: In procedure scm_fdes_to_port: Bad file descriptor
yes
checking whether symlink handles trailing slash correctly... yes
checking whether <sys/ioctl.h> declares ioctl... yes
checking for unsetenv... yes
checking for unsetenv() return type... int
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

That one likely doesn=E2=80=99t change the build outcome since it still
determines that =E2=80=98socklen_t=E2=80=99 is defined, but it sounds a bit=
 like a dice
roll.

Ludo=E2=80=99.

Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2025 15:17:29 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 06 10:17:29 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58852 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1tg3dB-0000Qr-J1
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2025 10:17:29 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47126)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1tg3d8-0000QZ-N8
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2025 10:17:27 -0500
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1tg3d3-0002ZQ-3m
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2025 10:17:21 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:Subject:From:To:Date:in-reply-to:
 references; bh=dMWYLEIOuvJIaUBD0PW1JRS7houWkf7cCF7aM331s+k=; b=TUmqttij90MBnc
 GEPj568Bx4AeUmIqCYQ4Ll9swkA0b6hvoUMoMXBBcVRchmsJZe8/4lXuuFPgmhtdZo2Pvq0trnSOy
 QHSmMgQ7XHJkiRMrLUwToyBDCQ6xjBZQWX1cjbOzh67o9lCg3NuSURl5rW4Rs4GhmTH6bkfQSZ2gE
 aHTLF/2WIOsYbP6jtTKzLcQmp/JyJJ98xTsHmg0XKaPNjeDHefd6kF7xtUB3w6aElrNA5CpKQvSzC
 qaG2Xanm4b/3IOZ0PYF74ZuRjKzxOfM5oEnzVhZ58p0LbGdC9c6gwaWpRiRlwHby1t+XM+wSvMU23
 CrH8PItamxhNHAzndRmg==;
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2025 16:17:12 +0100
Message-Id: <877c636r2f.fsf@HIDDEN>
To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Subject: control message for bug #75518
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

block 75518 by 75658
quit

Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Feb 2025 21:18:00 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 17 16:18:00 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50148 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1tk8V6-0001e4-Fd
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2025 16:18:00 -0500
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.83]:12127)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1tk8V3-0001dV-L8
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2025 16:17:58 -0500
Authentication-Results: mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr;
 dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none;
 spf=SoftFail smtp.mailfrom=ludo@HIDDEN;
 dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) d=gnu.org
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,293,1732575600"; d="scan'208";a="208701208"
Received: from 91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net (HELO ribbon) ([91.160.117.201])
 by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with
 ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Feb 2025 22:17:51 +0100
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 22:17:50 +0100
Message-Id: <87frkcl18h.fsf@HIDDEN>
To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Subject: control message for bug #75658
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)

severity 75658 important
quit

Last modified: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 21:30:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.