Received: (at 75879) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Feb 2025 20:59:21 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat Feb 15 15:59:20 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58216 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tjPFw-0004Gd-Hg for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Feb 2025 15:59:20 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53818) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1tjPFu-0004GI-0J for 75879 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Feb 2025 15:59:18 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1tjPFo-0002Uo-Dj; Sat, 15 Feb 2025 15:59:12 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=g7VRpzqJh8zmvJ2lmnjBhZrLzW3LMqhBr171JA6SExg=; b=GewKbij6jl6CDODcIDfm 5B/yIFEmeuDEq4S5eVOphANrzCbgwGQ+qyCBmZF4fvKW1QbVyBvOCbtUPvyyOQfMTMAbzDWsahrzT QTGbcmCNwPPaPPrVp3z+TpnHruVbMBaRHMnAqsR+MA4i4O7oEl2U3uYlZBsJ/OQQ9m4KyR7oaGp1M Ckdd2OWWWG3ZYtrUwKSvGYdo6mXHlUHv/kFmJKAY3z8g0Jo7HZuMVMBk0+TZp8YUg44cXV9vO4VGR sygY1gjcYGsvFC5El/mIBsM/uG937J2sUq0h7xPKQxGSS1nLYFzZ9F4auYjXMbF/QZTeBnu0/a9+u lALCkWDSYHdZZQ==; From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> To: David Elsing <david.elsing@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#75879: with-parameters does not work generally for packages In-Reply-To: <7yikq1p9g4.fsf@HIDDEN> (David Elsing's message of "Sun, 26 Jan 2025 21:11:07 +0000") References: <7yikq1p9g4.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2025 21:59:06 +0100 Message-ID: <87jz9qx6ud.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75879 Cc: dev@HIDDEN, zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN, othacehe@HIDDEN, me@HIDDEN, guix@HIDDEN, 75879 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi David, David Elsing <david.elsing@HIDDEN> skribis: > I noticed that 'with-parameters' from (guix gexp) does not work with > Guile parameters used in package definitions. They are still set > in 'lower-object', but not anymore when the monadic procedure returned > by 'lower-object' is evaluated. > > Attached is an example for a package wrapped by 'with-parameters', which > results in a file with "D" instead of "C" (it is not "A", because the > 'arguments' field of <package> is thunked). > > Is this intentional? I'm not really sure how (or whether) this should be > changed though. Something just came to mind: the object cache. The cache is keyed by object + system + target + grafts?; if there=E2=80=99s anything that influe= nces what the object lowers to, changes are the object->derivation mapping is already cached and that other thing will be ignored. That=E2=80=99s a problem generally speaking with using =E2=80=98with-parame= ters=E2=80=99 with parameters other than =E2=80=98%current-system=E2=80=99, =E2=80=98%current-= target-system=E2=80=99, and =E2=80=98%graft?=E2=80=99. I wonder if it=E2=80=99s the only thing at play here though. Ludo=E2=80=99.
bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#75879
; Package guix
.
Full text available.Ludovic Courtès <ludo@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
Full text available.Received: (at 75879) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jan 2025 23:02:58 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 31 18:02:58 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55341 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1te02M-0002C8-1d for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2025 18:02:58 -0500 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:57741) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <david.elsing@HIDDEN>) id 1te02J-0002Bs-CY for 75879 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2025 18:02:57 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B39C5240103 for <75879 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2025 00:02:48 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1738364568; bh=leFUe7B38hXNTKoifT7Mg3VgRbX0jkdF65yXgsqzClE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:From; b=O7uDK5yufWSwIzo7aMecS9w9bVOpkJOQqtWFUqRKgmDhpnySaevpPe8VQyU8lx6rZ jRBfs6J8JHCflRofDVKQjvpeN8mdLZudq5pRJul4krVGnfu9g75qTERnqAap6QfF7y AHovI9GMx6TCbAH8JdajhPXj6m2tjIGTQNyceFEufeQoUTDFSWnohNUKYwP3nnDixl pjv7kZRnw6e0JYOAdiZUIsEhjSFY+++7ZQnFLuYAcHqD5cFMXnHy99XsZafKyu9K6P xCbmXYlMY7XSa/J0yO42+ffoB5axkbUi4Q5KebK+DhPotUuNqWm3Wm6/w0EGB6Gjtj SyHlxG0YJNv0w== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4YlBHq5SXHz9rxD; Sat, 1 Feb 2025 00:02:47 +0100 (CET) From: David Elsing <david.elsing@HIDDEN> To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#70895] [PATCH] grafts: Only compute necessary graft derivations. In-Reply-To: <874j1fc5lm.fsf@HIDDEN> References: <20240512134301.2234-1-david.elsing@HIDDEN> <87zfs1921p.fsf@HIDDEN> <7ycyov5amj.fsf@HIDDEN> <87ikqbsp58.fsf@HIDDEN> <86sepetrtn.fsf@HIDDEN> <87h65tkqvx.fsf@HIDDEN> <7yldv3q3d1.fsf@HIDDEN> <87plk7aq27.fsf@HIDDEN> <7yfrl1pgcs.fsf@HIDDEN> <874j1fc5lm.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 23:02:47 +0000 Message-ID: <86frky7fjc.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75879 Cc: 75879 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hello, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@HIDDEN> writes: > Uh, looks like this is a real bug. I=E2=80=99m surprised because we do h= ave > tests for that in =E2=80=98tests/gexp.scm=E2=80=99 (and it=E2=80=99s actu= ally used in a few > important places), but maybe they=E2=80=99re not exercising the right thi= ng. Yes indeed, 'with-parameters' is tested for %current-system and %current-target-system, which are evaluated earlier as a special case in the gexp-compiler of <parameterized>, and an additional parameter is only tested by immediately evaluating it. Best, David
bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#75879
; Package guix
.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jan 2025 21:11:22 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jan 26 16:11:22 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58115 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tc9uc-0004fW-BU for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jan 2025 16:11:22 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:58844) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <david.elsing@HIDDEN>) id 1tc9ua-0004fG-Ah for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jan 2025 16:11:20 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <david.elsing@HIDDEN>) id 1tc9uT-0008P0-Vq for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Sun, 26 Jan 2025 16:11:14 -0500 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <david.elsing@HIDDEN>) id 1tc9uR-0007M5-St for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Sun, 26 Jan 2025 16:11:13 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 195B4240101 for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Sun, 26 Jan 2025 22:11:08 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1737925868; bh=vIXHk6YYZSWZnT6W+9sLGF0yPYwupdYDZqzsz6HTi6o=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:From; b=iWmpWw7CGwgUHbUW2yL1OxSTb6hoXcvzVClzKkxHXFXM63q8V240XD2zmeNge4573 LJ6CuRM4K4YIaydXncFkmMzVMLChz/7r4cuh4kZmHKiGO4dYlJYzWbjW6Z5qky28N4 E7DrR4OMbrzWMHAOppcIx0If8wQYSRnk9iGSgwcttwqrHPQpY7jxP5WNsg2HJN20e4 q1HLTJSMYkbv8ZnR/kidWUa62JrzN//vpgd11yOU+7gI6w9z2SO2WfVJe5hNDnnET6 GrZJgl/TpD3RYqZnzJKN2rhPOJNww3WYoSpNfCgxN4F9i7akFkQdGkIVqgKVWtWV0M TP9/krFDRTroQ== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4Yh43H5Lkgz9rxM for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Sun, 26 Jan 2025 22:11:07 +0100 (CET) From: David Elsing <david.elsing@HIDDEN> To: bug-guix@HIDDEN Subject: with-parameters does not work generally for packages X-Debbugs-Cc: guix@HIDDEN, dev@HIDDEN, ludo@HIDDEN, othacehe@HIDDEN, zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN, me@HIDDEN Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2025 21:11:07 +0000 Message-ID: <7yikq1p9g4.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=david.elsing@HIDDEN; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Hello, I noticed that 'with-parameters' from (guix gexp) does not work with Guile parameters used in package definitions. They are still set in 'lower-object', but not anymore when the monadic procedure returned by 'lower-object' is evaluated. Attached is an example for a package wrapped by 'with-parameters', which results in a file with "D" instead of "C" (it is not "A", because the 'arguments' field of <package> is thunked). Is this intentional? I'm not really sure how (or whether) this should be changed though. Best, David --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline; filename=test-parameter-package.scm (use-modules (guix build-system trivial) (guix gexp) (guix derivations) (guix packages) (guix store) (gnu packages base)) (define %param (make-parameter "A")) (define testp (package (name "testp") (version "0") (source #f) (build-system trivial-build-system) (arguments (list #:builder #~(let ((port (open-file (string-append #$output) "w"))) (display (string-append #$(%param) "\n") port) (close-port port)))) (home-page #f) (synopsis #f) (description #f) (license #f))) (%param "B") (define obj (with-parameters ((%param "C")) testp)) (%param "D") obj --=-=-=--
David Elsing <david.elsing@HIDDEN>
:guix@HIDDEN, dev@HIDDEN, ludo@HIDDEN, othacehe@HIDDEN, zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN, me@HIDDEN, bug-guix@HIDDEN
.
Full text available.guix@HIDDEN, dev@HIDDEN, ludo@HIDDEN, othacehe@HIDDEN, zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN, me@HIDDEN, bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#75879
; Package guix
.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.