Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 May 2025 11:20:18 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 02 07:20:18 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56927 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1uAoRG-0001Cn-9A for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 May 2025 07:20:18 -0400 Received: from tobias.gr ([2a02:c205:2020:6054::1]:53826) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <me@HIDDEN>) id 1uAoRD-00018c-Ah for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 May 2025 07:20:16 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=2018; bh=f3zPBD/mSyVMa wqCHFJQni1yxViP8+xsoCO2Ifetzlg=; h=to:subject:date:from; d=tobias.gr; b=PdkvoQwRwtZsiejojLdsD8jKxvdA6FcE/dVkV8o1eOK+MUQ+/qLCH07QDbzGVfpqAPR6 H7bRmTxwu20xoFrQPK2YQ0tNDPQ7TdflmoInRflwlh915LS2ofCCP2QOwlZA27sMLPNAbH DFm94xOTBIYMnu/T3LNCWyNhuoDGy4lgBRk6100pNF85KH9xCE8ywwepB5xRswbdeBGV8+ rIIY3rKMgS7PxltfexhKPHiuwYw5ihAn5/VuGcwj/kTw3T229e1AUBPqA2EfrjmbwqaO6H pClOkDr04HoK3S3qrW+GYspqXVXhzZMkbcKX5SJRYO/65+yzB/sVB6fKYNiMwqeA== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 819d058e (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 2 May 2025 11:20:14 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 13:19:41 +0200 Subject: Re: [GCD] A better name for the default branch Message-Id: <DBA61125-CF17-435D-971C-346CA6EC342E@HIDDEN> To: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (22E252) X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) I accept. Sent on the go. Excuse or enjoy my brevity.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2025 22:43:11 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 01 18:43:11 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54047 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1uAccZ-000864-8a for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 May 2025 18:43:11 -0400 Received: from mail-il1-x129.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::129]:57771) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <cox.katherine.e@HIDDEN>) id 1uAccT-00085R-PT for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 May 2025 18:43:08 -0400 Received: by mail-il1-x129.google.com with SMTP id e9e14a558f8ab-3d96836c1bcso5359425ab.3 for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 01 May 2025 15:43:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1746139380; x=1746744180; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:subject:from:to:content-language :user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=meleAQCAhNcZY1ujh/Waz33ZfDYgacgxumm5zCNGF0E=; b=X5z6B7e6kK+IMFMXqUCvWy634eocgaJEca50RQiT6vndVGhTpY+vgr1CC/tIHKcO7O cjNKlRDrTJg72PHr0+7gIX/d9lyeVkRXvBVXazHOwuRmN7iZyWGkTyHvffCCsiht/Ay0 lhVDnzsNQTnqr21CiwvQNhpHEiNQL5bV67Y7Hgeoxuump0wQQSoaS6FG/f+OYCPIzpAd qgB7NLeK9OwfXrKeU0CFF0knc2BwigiYlrScKdYoy6tt5NTb6SsAbMCqY2QrVNFbfC0Q OcDb7fwKlNhSBc1Y/4C4BjWp/CsR3kNHbmQHfBv0fKUrjirt5kRgfnPQE9Tc30TkDP18 k01Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1746139380; x=1746744180; h=content-transfer-encoding:subject:from:to:content-language :user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=meleAQCAhNcZY1ujh/Waz33ZfDYgacgxumm5zCNGF0E=; b=JvICj8QgAz77fgeMsXGiQRAaC3GQhE8LBKn7yMHLO22QcmJ8mnIAJFJZuwwTvxonIj KDTowmcz719nlrFaj7AdkfyHUgnJOahWaV6+ow6IAg7OU5eMLXw1+G0e3CCYl0ke2eDa J8PJkWOEfdG72DrSfA0F1qem1SdEQhEJ3GNccUsk01/OWzvDeHaUC0GjAOWgmTMqV/RJ z2csk75YZ6oQTynjL/YjTXpahBVfy/nepReOtjU9D7zyTmtNFqdjn1K7M7KDsI2rQ+6W /N/Wvux4TKFkRGJWxvjdS+1cAoPWVWDnNcAfIHsKb29YMaTbl4CK8LhviwtnoPh7deVS 5sww== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzvM2jFCCn9Q2/3LKKpw5qXOMQnlYeodW3Evkjx27FhYW9RW/Ng 0bxNo6ToLVdGtYAR9JsxFvsGXdDO2rBMqXRKBMhj2pYcTml3AN2JmK7j6q1N X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnct0p6m7PNwYhGNJeH9KNIWvijxUua+yza0R1xSM97qkr62gskOZKXaFO/vxI64 oU7dfZE4iBoNXOys0dp+PZ6dQrAoqGTfxW77WNOqtDF0OWswCvD12ubYK2PJH6fVf4op/mzO8Hs h5lVKmzCwrIR0V2WQqQoa21ZD47dplkrkuKUournMhEWwdm/FTVYHzXEpKf2VR3HHxIrEu8SuXj 0fvtfsTgb0xn0R72cA/XTb2sjcQOyWuCHeImXslSGCrHGpBhSB3labUpUmqlSRu0gvW87Wp9SFK nloFXjzsYR6qkIE1xye8RZ8miXtGRmFY6wyMScJkYdOwyk6m49x7pRQkPDmYbSY0pd1kOdMpo8q v5s1oXS8NN1y1mA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHnLxg3hydDp/furSFl3BARgyHNHxYtN3ClT66ePuKApI168hVFkITrN/IP4GcA9DF8F9WyJw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1fcf:b0:3d4:2a4e:1272 with SMTP id e9e14a558f8ab-3d97c2604bamr9271695ab.19.1746139379998; Thu, 01 May 2025 15:42:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.2.153] (c-174-51-218-141.hsd1.co.comcast.net. [174.51.218.141]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 8926c6da1cb9f-4f88a8cf769sm83067173.2.2025.05.01.15.42.59 for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 01 May 2025 15:42:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <16ca5542-a8f3-45c6-a709-4144c477bec7@HIDDEN> Date: Thu, 1 May 2025 16:42:58 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Icedove Daily Content-Language: en-US To: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org From: Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e@HIDDEN> Subject: I support Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) I support. Thanks for taking this up! - Katherine
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2025 10:10:19 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 01 06:10:19 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48809 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1uAQrz-0000SO-FV
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 May 2025 06:10:19 -0400
Received: from fout-a7-smtp.messagingengine.com ([103.168.172.150]:36671)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <me@HIDDEN>)
id 1uAQrw-0000Rz-2G
for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 May 2025 06:10:17 -0400
Received: from phl-compute-03.internal (phl-compute-03.phl.internal
[10.202.2.43])
by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2DE913801BD;
Thu, 1 May 2025 06:10:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phl-mailfrontend-01 ([10.202.2.162])
by phl-compute-03.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 01 May 2025 06:10:10 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
bonfacemunyoki.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date
:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version
:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1746094210;
x=1746180610; bh=6pUyZ1fBEokYsZTNvpy9k6rIAiP2uuW67Fuxk2+tpKo=; b=
AaGz/098yW96LNq+Dh2k5RPdy7e3OqYhWa/JIgN8djjqH00PDSiuXwKsdQyEcyl/
giRGfd6dk8pYqXr3Mb4dzERLbbsOcGNXjegVfkFohXniPr33Is+SmdYVvzdWB4Lq
JuZGMAEzG4jat76ghLXEGwLMRzWJyOmWqwUF79OwL7DPCBW4+0nb2s7kaEfCAsdB
7T4614dK8nTcptrE9AostFYT1MuxwFC403qpQnRFff47sFyKRT8tWgdyASC4/gM1
NBVUu+gC1sYsKLmQaMOnAXg5CuUl7Gs+Kj97F1qvLVtIZ6zVFC6PfKY1AvDBkJyi
gFFvsajmzzMB1giO0SBKIw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date
:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to
:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to
:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=
1746094210; x=1746180610; bh=6pUyZ1fBEokYsZTNvpy9k6rIAiP2uuW67Fu
xk2+tpKo=; b=vgqNu4XyfV3JysHLecozSIEXshDkHXAPk2zgJWNUjHrqoSttOOR
Kuu6vPH82bquZBoWOD2Rjk5UfsN/c9CehQRXGvDMx0f3S3ITmzsSg94g1yN3TZ2V
Ccd2wOLStXR8OqMzPlPcMbH5KeSUE2eGZUJHyu1QBIzLEM6v3Hfboqp99O8OiwEP
o8A2Bsmy4OBT6YlZtZNGXxlPM2Bcv9SqC21TrVYHk7vZ8819Bab7ewuSVnFSL9AE
ZP0wBSO57RYo/Q+1fH/5cZRpG66o4Jv5JX7ttwsdUFx8NN2cR+GGhP2dQokHuset
YOxSKXYkuU8bQ1BuJMMREduKOgc+BoGv1gQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:gkgTaMYU-gWQELSoXDlaIPYE_HhpOCF1z4_he8wR7dKG5lGty_Jv8w>
<xme:gkgTaHbYolz_k_XwzzXTa9wvq0G1NhoBBnixyhu26yRnT0NC2hs7NiQGABSn-itVc
rgaHeNXwlUZLwguogA>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:gkgTaG-G-JfFFgeApd5fBTJNoGRPDqN8G_K4wCQ77afQzEGrllmeJNOvqb77kA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefvddrtddtgddvieelfedtucetufdoteggodetrf
dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggv
pdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpih
gvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhephffvvefujghffffkgggtsehgtderredttddt
necuhfhrohhmpefouhhnhihokhhiucfmihhlhihunhhgihcuoehmvgessghonhhfrggtvg
hmuhhnhihokhhirdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedtudetfefgieeukeelkefh
ueeftdehteejuedtudejjefhtedvlefgtdeujeefleenucffohhmrghinhepohhpvghnph
hgphdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhr
ohhmpehmvgessghonhhfrggtvghmuhhnhihokhhirdgtohhmpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhope
egpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehlihhlihgrnhgrrdhprhhikhhl
vghrsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepghhuihigqdguvghvvghlsehgnhhurd
horhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepihhnfhhoqdhguhhigiesghhnuhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthho
peejieegtdejseguvggssghughhsrdhgnhhurdhorhhg
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:gkgTaGpj0HJR8cqHb4hdOTCSzuMDkcNgpTkVBsDpWzfJeuNDv32IBA>
<xmx:gkgTaHpUB-ruj_Y4vkYtBK9sjamY5oEuibYayoEVcuOjFPnms5WVuw>
<xmx:gkgTaEQwY2inWGKU6Vj1y0l2Jnw9NvI5ra8xvydS6QF4exDLVeqsSA>
<xmx:gkgTaHo25nh86jBX_jj9yjV5VVdKm8f1Dmoo2eBwhVNJ2UCIG0GhJg>
<xmx:gkgTaCDt4sFgK-UWWMfU8Av6aw3yxNs9w7NRrEl9Rr6efhGYOBTDFy7R>
Feedback-ID: ib8a1471e:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu,
1 May 2025 06:10:09 -0400 (EDT)
From: Munyoki Kilyungi <me@HIDDEN>
To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>, guix-devel@HIDDEN,
info-guix@HIDDEN
Subject: Re: Deliberation period for GCD 003 "Rename the default branch" has
technically started
In-Reply-To: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN>
References: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 01 May 2025 13:10:06 +0300
Message-ID: <871pt83am9.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407
Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)
--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I support
=2D-=20
(Life is like a pencil that will surely run out,
but will leave the beautiful writing of life)
(D4F09EB110177E03C28E2FE1F5BBAE1E0392253F
(hkp://keys.openpgp.org))
--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=pZQ8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2025 09:46:12 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 01 05:46:12 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48709 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1uAQUd-0004aR-MY for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 May 2025 05:46:12 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x531.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::531]:48287) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <efraim.flashner@HIDDEN>) id 1uAQUW-0004ZW-VO for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 May 2025 05:46:08 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-x531.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5e5cded3e2eso1201443a12.0 for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 01 May 2025 02:46:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1746092759; x=1746697559; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=IkPkj2ItLYOTnaL7l8myWp/1r0PUq5ppoeRrpDS+9tk=; b=hNxoTHSFIl3Ea3lEKToHEFyKOMd1SN6nr37z8MIibIvto90/cDad+bH94s0dYWPxq/ EErg0hOJgeApxqNZX/i6kfecwfcDhy5HVbsWSmFt0cK5SG/MNPotrqQn//Fa46eh7Uz7 MRzfhQsZx8ibe/CIcD/w9rN6n/+sbu6Ev/92sdyhmXMCV7XoZXRv3mm7pC5Y6GXHK+Zr 6oRoGZz0dcmJqU/CEXdPjuk1RtymsJPBp+7d6L2SkCszSGqtmRNMp4/rwuaKre/zRCxi QxmQOvsV7kpZfxdi1o7CeN2ewec9q2oT6glufaUP3uqmZzO1Z08gzlxgtuA7jZKUdL42 ov8w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1746092759; x=1746697559; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:sender :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=IkPkj2ItLYOTnaL7l8myWp/1r0PUq5ppoeRrpDS+9tk=; b=qGtlQ/0yVZAFehveoL85Ew8llDyn2q4dmZNfLSa37qayFMOhl6sTJOR1DWQTJioOn/ iPCTjIGYV5gwnEj7U5g0mPBYuMOrwsrJYC/zUZS7ZDRLuC7z73KfddIQJHTi0UGdkata OFhVT6l7zjicaKBXJK4ozDpvTAlwpn54YhO1txPFbheb8dVKtd++SZCx405XjEVfb0Fa yeCsQVa3Q6cslVDLJaen1JR8zTeOLn3pUijoS3NObWzMaPIlH/DoPEeyUTKeSI3WodU7 OBAa34qoNZspCLIw4EfSxe80Iru8XdrQLZIDT+cNYpeaKSBzk+EBmczkqzV5mODS1eom 0m2Q== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCU3XMTDfo/B2/tKj4NVGPA/JHK5GvUMGJ1fIacSAimlcS1nnVsDjeuSFNrJHgmrmfe2deQY/A==@debbugs.gnu.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwFj3fgCe2eS6sMjcEmnj8z+JmPzp5er+qlmg8NTd/E1Euz9w43 wqpJTq2Y0NDGfkSl910gBGnAREgsx3DKC0mCRp+kL7cCgUUXo/GY X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvSLL3nFxKd4Xo3BmzOzI2YctnyNoabpp6qx6Xscsu/Ot0w/yO0bigsgincWIM DdgdcPt5pdzp/BI1Ha4X0y7zxCUdMB/IVjF5OHLmpMN2NaD2KV7+tz2T1//dLT8TGbtVfTrB5Pr CuDkfCGIY/Twzs7AY1a22negZKFHcYuW1mwcFrVJUPQAHEYjlMvBPYUWFRE1mZVBJogP2BSJKPM FjrIpWeoF5q3fJxEvRVQFyFqT431hgsc/F8qcKWKAG4x+IKQUcVKGEe0eFRsR82cNPVqHjg8WmR MIp+yd1ZSuGnwk1PQ3V2IntYwiidnl0vM6/8ycn9 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFbmuNy8e+cu2uC3synflEhoMDtofZBffJcIeMvo2Fud2wakOPzhgzqH0d6/l6y0F17DIgVsw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:2111:b0:5f6:fab2:9128 with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5f9127e26aemr2160984a12.19.1746092758458; Thu, 01 May 2025 02:45:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([141.226.15.135]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5f92fb9c283sm215954a12.0.2025.05.01.02.45.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 01 May 2025 02:45:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 1 May 2025 12:45:54 +0300 From: Efraim Flashner <efraim@HIDDEN> To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: Deliberation period for GCD 003 "Rename the default branch" has technically started Message-ID: <aBNC0tQUBqw0VwW6@3900XT> Mail-Followup-To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>, guix-devel@HIDDEN, 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org References: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yX+l5kmyyAdhqjS+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x41AAE7DCCA3D8351 X-PGP-Key: https://flashner.co.il/~efraim/efraim_flashner.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: guix-devel@HIDDEN, 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --yX+l5kmyyAdhqjS+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I support --=20 Efraim Flashner <efraim@HIDDEN> =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --yX+l5kmyyAdhqjS+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAmgTQs4ACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1FTgxAAh7mDk4e2G0yu06oD6WCGrDZpASxEOO8MxELqDXvxfkogJWGLC4Yv6UqB q03BwSJkfpTkwXP4YZlNC3tl8HQZhML/0bygJxEXlW5r7B9fFCUKG4IstyrG+BEl 4RCJ4+y16fIKUY/D2opPgjqzO73MdqI77PQvOa6yKxxF3rnf3iImjSs6Ku3tqvAH Ba0/GuIjJpmOoxeSDcZ4zZFSlmuRE6Zbp23h6XWnjwT6OS4OKTDOaOtyNeTHGZaa Edsp8mgfTZ9mariWVvln9iPq/XRtay5l+8lsEij/9rCwx8/h+JWknnZ6c73KHKXt UVi4vle5NPyOnNsmVe8hWHVP8a86Xo3J4LwdPoiTiaYlKf2Soa5UrkaOv3T0D0v7 WXX7oezZ2BPWIf/TKegFknDQ51iRlmuJYC0gWSjkguR0X7NNjhl0ivzZA8rXIKzG kbY5zqIAItn9gEnVSL5RKvozT8FvlWNdz7kyljyIxQNjungzqzQ3KidKaDrZ3C2u SmowvGmf6GHo9qW0levYHNnMOS7KwLa7I9qwEwtUaUrkV0SEJeC9LWZL1wqPwhr/ ceQXR0FHa/5x7GKzU+4A6fMjeI7fqyxgNpSVJosB/2zAVKMP4IluVgcK9mcZ1GQU kyulMuypXYrSI6XDLWcxRnyM0bY542jf0uzrV4EeLsaKQbMhUF8= =6zRv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yX+l5kmyyAdhqjS+--
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2025 00:01:33 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Apr 30 20:01:33 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46569 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1uAHMq-0001aw-Vk for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2025 20:01:33 -0400 Received: from fhigh-a4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([103.168.172.155]:58133) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <philip@HIDDEN>) id 1uAHMm-0001aZ-Ua for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2025 20:01:30 -0400 Received: from phl-compute-03.internal (phl-compute-03.phl.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B93B311400D5; Wed, 30 Apr 2025 20:01:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-imap-14 ([10.202.2.87]) by phl-compute-03.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 30 Apr 2025 20:01:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= philipmcgrath.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1746057683; x=1746144083; bh=LdRfwMR4aB kIwhphBLF4VyPn/jIlQoJnQ/1qWgOkayc=; b=gs0L56olHgI4azLYxB/wcDEM5P kBCZGRRCCmZlz6jzUE00PJARENBFQzPjFhfwN9hAg5vj92nFYN99ehTb0y85Mfvp gzIxBi99THYtQ5JZks0ONhKYSeVY6mmRH31QYEm9CXl+ya8sO0ccWGVt/Yhm8mKf vDVRZT5QnDU/3SN7LR+sB1zCGsxc2CbPFouWxOAsvjF7ohEyVMayg0yu/6zliMgn 9Ja5T6T/kmnY/HMhKSEPcXN9K8vXlih3Mo9eLgxLiKObo55vsPc+aA4e3aDmkbYt yrhwon8iF+PpJzDvLNPOEKXljWmasRNbBo32Y1NlbhZljlHQJYEQo8YxDOAA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1746057683; x= 1746144083; bh=LdRfwMR4aBkIwhphBLF4VyPn/jIlQoJnQ/1qWgOkayc=; b=U ZR2nxJmDkXlk7/h2FcCjTAZsWeFc0fP3LGoiZ3+u/tMlt4gss/HkLYOnbuxUfvdd icyBMF6S+xKznzur2nYMg/G9rIWkPKzaDd/g8ei1xa73cn05vbj+6IemURHqWyQt yUK2RQ/M6ailMsySYP1bs2ccZjGDbVwQsT+tyTPKNKZxl+RdatkzX8CyXWb78j6i wqcoRVoAtTQpasWrv3M/6XtfijQ/JJOnDpELOSIoIsJeCZvexB9jGNXg+/i/e6xY 16u5JcCkVMV6BW1urHT0bbx9wMICBRVTld2h3QAsAfGppMzbYcyTsvNXTVEIMV5T wyAjJe2k7yXBZqOwpGlkw== X-ME-Sender: <xms:07kSaHZZWuXkq45VQZmEPXshIayIPKL9VGNeD1Kdge1vPCC2MRflRg> <xme:07kSaGY3luhsdNw_b2i-me61HQdCcBxlyx1Q_wPwSTuQs2lLNoQnaasnzrFUrVcDK 2fXRw2f9DaNtBcrsGI> X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefvddrtddtgddvieektdekucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggv pdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpih gvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepofggfffhvfevkfgjfhfutgfgsehtjeertder tddtnecuhfhrohhmpedfrfhhihhlihhpucfotgfirhgrthhhfdcuoehphhhilhhiphesph hhihhlihhpmhgtghhrrghthhdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepvdefieelteef iedujeehffetudegvdduvdeffffhffelheevffeljeekfeekudevnecuffhomhgrihhnpe hgnhhomhgvrdhorhhgpdhgihhtlhgrsgdrtghomhdpgidrtghomhdpkhgvrhhnvghlrdho rhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepph hhihhlihhpsehphhhilhhiphhmtghgrhgrthhhrdgtohhmpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopeef pdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopeejieegtdejseguvggssghughhsrd hgnhhurdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtoheplhhilhhirghnrgdrphhrihhklhgvrhesghhmrghi lhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehguhhigidquggvvhgvlhesghhnuhdrohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:07kSaJ-SI3tVCvCJLvH0Osn5eBVgmmLiw7J7UsAuQZWLjRqNgKcWTg> <xmx:07kSaNqzV7UaSt2BSsMBa-BI-X_rcy8fIlAzyPTsv-Y9wthcsOSRqg> <xmx:07kSaCo0KRe9D4pcpkq17lx9r-WK9P4xMQfbwgjZmXFVA8BKxHSbgA> <xmx:07kSaDSOB-WdBR50I0vO1UydZPtm2C8ac_tmiLMhN1uRrgo6vpXBoA> <xmx:07kSaOdcbBPGR6JqNAi8vGvWSvxGLi4-DGHw4aK6yLJx9To7jXohcWM9> Feedback-ID: i2b1146f3:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.phl.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 4B8D92800087; Wed, 30 Apr 2025 20:01:23 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThreadId: Tf070f1dc5caeffe8 Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 20:01:01 -0400 From: "Philip McGrath" <philip@HIDDEN> To: "Liliana Marie Prikler" <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>, "Guix Development" <guix-devel@HIDDEN> Message-Id: <45ec2006-4735-4868-83fb-dd8cf51a8a20@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> References: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: Deliberation period for GCD 003 "Rename the default branch" has technically started Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) I support. I did note thoughtful comments from some people who support the goal of renaming but have concerns about implementation specifics. I hope constructive suggestions to improve implementation will be welcome (though I don't have any myself), but I especially support making this change now, in conjunction with GCD 002. Since I haven't seen it mentioned elsewhere in this discussion, one factor that's informed my view is that, while "master" indeed has many meanings, its use in Git appears to derive from its use in Bitkeeper, the non-free version control system Git was written to replace, and Bitkeeper explicitly uses "master" as part of a "master"/"slave" model. Some references: - https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2019-May/msg00066.html - https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2021/03/10/new-git-default-branch-name/ - https://x.com/xpasky/status/1272958618124595201 - https://lore.kernel.org/git/Pine.LNX.4.58.0506242257450.11175@HIDDEN/
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Apr 2025 18:03:02 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Apr 30 14:03:02 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36116 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1uABlt-0000lr-Nc for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2025 14:03:02 -0400 Received: from latitanza.investici.org ([2001:888:2000:56::19]:50431) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <divya@HIDDEN>) id 1uABlq-0000lg-Q8 for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2025 14:02:59 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=subvertising.org; s=stigmate; t=1746035136; bh=2Vmp4aMpfHWl7j2PlSLhckIY4hAESKF9SXNgztpHR+A=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=rAQ0qNeMZj4B0ZW5W9xUayBtmL/3f7P5JzAUHNJLRkbIm+mTWlTYPnef62eFy7G24 o5uC9EPQqgMQe8LFSOH1Uk9e9UDlWCglmnVJTyREgl5k7suDGatYgfR0msDn3dxMo+ Udvc3LAKPow25kB0oZcrO3gV2IRcv2ASXHAT52NI= Received: from mx3.investici.org (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by latitanza.investici.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Znl2m4MyVzGp4c; Wed, 30 Apr 2025 17:45:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.94.249.234] (mx3.investici.org [82.94.249.234]) (Authenticated sender: divya@HIDDEN) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Znl2l2yykzGp4V; Wed, 30 Apr 2025 17:45:35 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 17:45:25 +0000 From: Divya Ranjan <divya@HIDDEN> To: guix-devel@HIDDEN, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>, info-guix@HIDDEN Subject: =?US-ASCII?Q?Re=3A_Deliberation_period_for_GCD_003_=22Rename?= =?US-ASCII?Q?_the_default_branch=22_has_technically_started?= User-Agent: Thunderbird for Android In-Reply-To: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> References: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <42B91BB7-0F4B-4ADD-B1EC-A8E38C0CDA13@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=----KAAZKF0QBZSQ476DG23O5BMMVR0B7J Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) ------KAAZKF0QBZSQ476DG23O5BMMVR0B7J Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I disapprove=2E On 21 April 2025 14:07:14 GMT, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana=2Eprikler@gm= ail=2Ecom> wrote: >Hi Guix, > >as the date for the GCD 003 was set to February 18th, the discussion >period actually ended on Saturday already=2E I have incorporated some >changes on Sunday to realign the proposal with GCD 002 (the Codeberg >one), but barring any emergency changes there, GCD 003 is now to be >considered final=2E > >As outlined in GCD 001, please respond to this mail with one of the >following: > >- =E2=80=9CI support=E2=80=9D, meaning that you support the proposal; >- =E2=80=9CI accept=E2=80=9D, meaning that you consent to the implementat= ion of the > proposal; >- =E2=80=9CI disapprove=E2=80=9D, meaning that you oppose the implementat= ion of the > proposal=2E > >To count my own vote, I support the change of the default branch name >to =E2=80=9Cmain=E2=80=9D=2E > >Cheers > Divya Ranjan, Mathematics, Philosophy and Libre Software ------KAAZKF0QBZSQ476DG23O5BMMVR0B7J Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html><head></head><body><div dir=3D"auto">I disapprove=2E</div><br><br><di= v class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"auto">On 21 April 2025 14:07:14 GMT, Li= liana Marie Prikler <liliana=2Eprikler@gmail=2Ecom> wrote:</div><bloc= kquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0=2E8ex; border-l= eft: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> <pre class=3D"k9mail"><div dir=3D"auto">Hi Guix,<br><br>as the date for th= e GCD 003 was set to February 18th, the discussion<br>period actually ended= on Saturday already=2E I have incorporated some<br>changes on Sunday to r= ealign the proposal with GCD 002 (the Codeberg<br>one), but barring any eme= rgency changes there, GCD 003 is now to be<br>considered final=2E<br><br>As= outlined in GCD 001, please respond to this mail with one of the<br>follow= ing:<br><br>- =E2=80=9CI support=E2=80=9D, meaning that you support the pro= posal;<br>- =E2=80=9CI accept=E2=80=9D, meaning that you consent to the imp= lementation of the<br> proposal;<br>- =E2=80=9CI disapprove=E2=80=9D, mean= ing that you oppose the implementation of the<br> proposal=2E<br><br>To co= unt my own vote, I support the change of the default branch name<br>to =E2= =80=9Cmain=E2=80=9D=2E<br><br>Cheers<br><br></div></pre></blockquote></div>= <div dir=3D"auto">Divya Ranjan, Mathematics, Philosophy and Libre Software<= /div></body></html> ------KAAZKF0QBZSQ476DG23O5BMMVR0B7J--
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Apr 2025 16:24:44 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Apr 30 12:24:44 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44194 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1uAAEl-00080l-LD
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2025 12:24:44 -0400
Received: from mx0.riseup.net ([198.252.153.6]:44668)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <nandre@HIDDEN>) id 1uAAEk-00080V-4s
for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2025 12:24:42 -0400
Received: from fews02-sea.riseup.net (fews02-sea-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.112])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
(No client certificate requested)
by mx0.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ZnjFH6QDgz9wZ5;
Wed, 30 Apr 2025 16:24:35 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
t=1746030276; bh=E69YT5JJZpsLRInWi1fBMTuwXKYRXiYw/r6OsIIYTac=;
h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From;
b=WKhlbjI15mPd1enb9pNkQiiQTwQqyjGn6EV7din0QtGaTxjp1fEGN/y45gR1wfN3i
ZOB33YhicoTBdpAKLi/ZruQFEYANDYlPqkP/kgcY1C2A2Utb6yK0AYjba13GGKrefS
AgUXi9D3o6l/2G97qxhpSHKOgKD9jCYcA2cZ69m0=
X-Riseup-User-ID: 84DEDBDEAEFDB58FAFD925CEF547EFE4D1ABADC28CBDA2B123CD702593CDA3C2
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by fews02-sea.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4ZnjFG4ybRzFpsc;
Wed, 30 Apr 2025 16:24:34 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 13:24:12 -0300
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Batista <nandre@HIDDEN>
To: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: About GCD process, consensus and derailment (was Re:
Deliberation period for GCD 003 "Rename the default branch" has technically
started)
Message-ID: <aBJOrMjWflalm7T_@andel>
References: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN>
<87ecxlqr31.fsf@wireframe> <87msc63ms8.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <87msc63ms8.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407
Cc: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@HIDDEN>, guix-devel@HIDDEN,
Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>, 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)
Hi Simon,
qua 23 abr 2025 às 17:44:39 (1745441079), zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN enviou:
> Hi Vagrant, all,
>
> On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 at 11:58, Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@HIDDEN> wrote:
>
> > The nature of (at least some of) those responses were largely a negation
> > that left little room to discuss how to move forward, which left me at
> > an impass as to how to even continue the discussion.
> >
> > Only in retrospect of having encountered this situation did I realize
> > there is a fundamental flaw in the GCD process (at least in my
> > opinion)...
>
> I think the fundamental flaw comes from the lack of self-discipline.
>
> Somehow, I’ve seen too: « a negation that left little room to discuss
> how to move forward ». Building consensus requires a friendly mindset
> of the participants. Did we read that?
>
>
> > in that there is a presumption of moving forward and
> > accepting the proposed changes (in some capacity), rather than
> > maintaining the status quo. E.g. a person has to propose improvements in
> > order to reject the proposal, but there is nowhere in the process that
> > handles a fundamental disagreement about the proposal in any form. This
> > is contrary to any other genuine consensus process I have worked with.
>
> As I wrote in [1]:
>
> Why do people need to drag in the discussion – in no specific order–:
> Black friends, personal history with slavery or dictatorship, opinions
> on US imperialism, Gaza massacre, English language, Ukrainian war, a
> quote of Frantz Fanon, etc.
>
> Well, from my point of view, the flaw isn’t about “proposing
> improvements in order to reject the proposal”, the flaw comes from the
> inadequate mindset when approaching the proposal. For instance, one
> might disagree with the motivations section and instead of locking the
> discussion in some confrontational opinions, instead one might frame:
>
I agree, but this mindset maybe has to be either "fixed" or taken in
account by the process itself.
Blind, arbitrary negation shouldn't be valid, IMU. People need to
understand that if a GCD was worked on and has supporters, there is an
issue to be addressed and that our personal preferences aren't what we
are being asked for, aka, this is not a pure voting system.
So even if the issue described does not affect one ("works here"), that
does not mean the issue is non-existent.
With this in mind, the bias towards approval is not a flaw or something
that was overlooked, but how we should work on it.
It could be that some proposal didn't get support, had an improper
solution, raised other issues which were not addressed, etc. However,
it should not be admissable to disapprove without having "made
constructive comments during the discussion period", as GCD-1 stated.
In sum, disapproval blockades are not valid.
The flaw I see with this is: how do we decide if "constructive
comments" were made? Vote counting becomes convoluted and recursive.
Vote invalidation becomes a sore issue among us.
IMO, right now we give it time to mature, before trying any premature
"optimization" to the process.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2025 18:08:52 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 29 14:08:51 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60888 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1u9pNz-0006Yn-E4 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 14:08:51 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.12]:42253) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <jonathan.brielmaier@HIDDEN>) id 1u9pNw-0006X6-Ei for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 14:08:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=web.de; s=s29768273; t=1745950121; x=1746554921; i=jonathan.brielmaier@HIDDEN; bh=/ojESokxnVcy7oOuhht9NiB7ILUqqE7l1OPkRsMknaM=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc: References:From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:cc:content-transfer-encoding: content-type:date:from:message-id:mime-version:reply-to:subject: to; b=GBfmafGMvA9okaDvnTCut64qDfVTqd9d+SbAtD92lRH9BZCN2wmzqzwp1/c/r/iV 5sROVYuwf2brYoYs0DWfqJ2INczWQblt26PpiIOIEYGIfIWLFEkk8I5qzi5XN8H1I uDHNN0nRZqFJJ7z3EKq4F4kaTicca9TmtRm6b5vTwOC8y0zKchLqQOgfQ79IMd2Sz rruCd1RVDX7k2HA3uy3lsrwB9P00N8tX3DuKV6ZKl7DdKixOR7D95/xvA0NuP4IK2 Ptfe0g7pchgVFvqyIztH6N7Uh0zVm3ESAxuLdf87tUvghkcLLFHN9tO4aDaJP37Hf VBsWnXo66uhg4EgyQA== X-UI-Sender-Class: 814a7b36-bfc1-4dae-8640-3722d8ec6cd6 Received: from [192.168.1.109] ([77.189.175.50]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb105 [213.165.67.124]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1Mm9Va-1urzp32Rwu-00pLuA; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 20:08:41 +0200 Message-ID: <34bc1853-e422-45b7-a100-de158e3798ca@HIDDEN> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 20:08:40 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Deliberation period for GCD 003 "Rename the default branch" has technically started To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> References: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> Content-Language: de-DE From: Jonathan Brielmaier <jonathan.brielmaier@HIDDEN> Autocrypt: addr=jonathan.brielmaier@HIDDEN; keydata= xsBNBFLri3sBCAC70cM07IJUQ2ZJaIsJy3gIDyNhtbRCFuu5zpuzhbqQ/+CsNX7zFGRn47xx O/QnByEA5FIUspgXFaSX72tMGD1MnydJ6PO+i1OuspEcpneqtaIn74TWq/tJxwll0A8qwJXD HZ9r4lQrTsJkUkaWgIeWJfwy2bi/Eu2RwcgApa3fKCBXbNCIif1/LkM6Y9xH7vedYiSE6yDs Tuy5xQmZqkoRnpr/Gfc0JrNFRWZr99VNIHDvIkqczfuYHqfCTxndFbc9WjBj7XgumAi/4Il5 RaUHlBpG19IV0kO8OfJxyfLvOa1vjX0vTXt5WxpnCXk/r7Fux0BwImFbysCEjL+picGPABEB AAHNJGpvbnNnZXIgPGpvbmF0aGFuLmJyaWVsbWFpZXJAd2ViLmRlPsLAlQQTAQgAPwIbIwYL CQgHAwIGFQgCCQoLBBYCAwECHgECF4AWIQSBQWA26Bpc94+AEHHs/IOYi05LnwUCZbgCNgUJ FK2qOwAKCRDs/IOYi05Ln4ztB/47yrAeIqSboGgAkiomBqw8vTyLhFSf4tx/7Un4TP84RYmO H2loDQ0tmUqQB4HWXJc9mGPafnCPmoICQ9uY3kUSl5gL7i29f0HBdoCTW7Vu2uk8XdBvZW8Y DfrqK/UBQ5POor7obZWCcTgP6AbintkBGHKNcfft6kKXbNP5W3QUO/vZvGkxtvFh5vAeLdrI Bkl+QbQELlhNjTr69y3ahHfLp7CUrKJkWYc2pC4aMyoInywhdWX48H4m/Oh/OaMsURb5l/yB +2H3dYXUcHIN8EycOIOq7CoX5bBZesJrDubuM7PfnaWvN7FysY1unJ5Q9gJ0O4qJs1rs2n3e 0HvXVU4PzsBNBFLri3sBCACwZ6+JWOTtYCKURCtuNbmxwvxTmePYmJy1ROX3FUAkp5sp93XB h4Qx2K0kjn2pVvMXRCC8SYF3If/xhVJ/Bl7VdZB8AZlBXdxLfYiFcmqqDphPZcRuVb2uRNXl JbGzXkWIzNUL5uRZj/Gepqj6+OiriskW6ebj0bgc3XJ6aJs/Y2Y6O7AcTdA6FA8KNi5iRfq7 boBGXBqSayP+pDx9IeAByJVMf1Uo9qbVnM7jvHckzfpsHsaYtpb6qKP2TfpD4jpafoS7Jg/n pgGwtrSVPG6bO7pUA10acAt2MllEgNiniOSClfBTH7mzOzzm5JJwO62Z5KCdIDGm0KfxlHkC UWN9ABEBAAHCwHwEGAEIACYCGwwWIQSBQWA26Bpc94+AEHHs/IOYi05LnwUCZ5lRVgUJFo75 WwAKCRDs/IOYi05Ln/h2CAC35aCiZ11JScDarUwAs7o1QRWIAqP75DMEFdHHHKDr/cc3gpxy SR+bk4iDJlC9lMCLUn4ryxYCPUn5/6K0Bk5xPPCOyKzl9V9PGi/mToEhHrqs7C2adecZPTXg smH5aBFRNKjzjqr0pzSWDb4pmcXVu/ly5X45JtKLxiawl7k42SQracwQVphpgWlzcKQUi0v5 SKJdjJ0wD82zn+kvNKUzlv0RNxLCinZ7bRUjxG9zGKmdXmZ5YwOnNhUCesAouHAj0U1iZ6qI E4ydJlSLrbxLag78YhJwBKqQ/x6gDbULrtyZqe3yv+hqYCuwHI/s9CFZVTm3ttid/7DdpTsM WI2/ In-Reply-To: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:tLNFH7eekjdvp2vXR1viADFZkSSwASS2tF4YXR8tjX7wXqpHNwz p3Se6tjH9eZy7bs9gRRvGSc/KANOdFtaUS1el+qoh2RrP5HRJgkLu9qtbEap1WZfFuPqmxo 6enzjBnw/1biOH8SrxzYQmr6zOzRzdRG6jVxRwHtw9HhPhRjyM3D9s9fCXvSRH6WP3OS3+B 7eUUIicZwkoDM1pm2avHg== X-Spam-Flag: NO UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:3gzh+gCinkE=;naEXtpLtcLfs4K+ffBHeWvBJrN/ z/p7HLER47XQ4MNJTzCjivqTbVcf1xFrQG1v3HOFnOwl8R/NLeLTxsMyELdMawhC7cjqLS141 aHnoxNQldWtnSsauEwpUML42RIgvGWWNHz3jHCWgEnEAi5YuJKuivvXRtkDEw/m4WE1eGwSoY QxgJ3AGkPAeYgXdKK6LnFhwm86jG0Am1V5GX1Z6Zlp6zyI6vj/m85ALR6VFAsyq5WrL8xM3uj JmnvsYwjeJLeuUqLh1gqFRilehZ32r9tJoY7RTbzocn2+fZw8LsWdjFyBffQzohgNB7WGquhG iCGG6HDEgaX8uFpir2dgb/WRDzOECy+AQF7amssnjqo2ua0GIo+j5jXOr6ptFqF5WdXKNn2e4 IAVZiH5Cg9sfc0iImCohUkkvQCcQnnhqdf/IyEcYT4TPpO1C1IUQdfUn78h5sC4jTaxpR/8Iw AwoK02SCJ3WKA29xinQI02VUjmRJQatXTcBUgjG8TEaPkd0Y/PiI+TQgKgutgYYpyytJfARp9 ZoKYUpy7jWo3JkNvdeTmSu2TRLDPS+c3lej3ENZdKUDJfHWxbHCMa44rKaeNtA8vAEY0HrDt5 fpYFAajXRHHfs3uxpcIo6USY9L2uk4xtRIe7V2DT1FsZv+VhIDc7of3zmLrtC2CQtUXjannex 14IIXiCopD3j6rq1PquBQ+X4IKFfFRWlUKqkV72MNkUNJ9Yn2kSH7lMMG8Nv57gdXaXWUvxGz N0Vu5BJADzKLRt0mRNcL6oDR+cV049Yq6+cdoCwu940B9XB7dzmh6vKrxqP1W9LRGKFjATkq+ p1lJ5w+qOcGniJHptYchnPjILCC7BTwXkEJoR9+WrqYqblXw2OGRFayTf6j8iTaOJndljqxGj VcV/a1YGva4XmafJPoZqlZlsnHjILszYQgZkAk5Ppb673Wgjflwh9uwdLVGcuOZJ9esTAEu50 D/mnVNvRqWU2ztbWjBMyB/FPxYqgjxl3ZtYRtB/NSxUjEGR85CaGAuuZXdoSSiU/GFZGzIblw 190j3bz/Xg4gv9RaEcc9D7/YikMRy2+lTr0CK2Due4upGqSpMp6uukX7XkdmDvD2VO+LfJqfA nalUSoFOCCTP5z5yMTaB1L8yzw/b+dRzsW88KM8i+VwBoGsH1hKg73hyXcWqf3TgnL1Q6M9rZ uBdIuUI0Rz9CXG2QLfuxfpHS3+sWATbWxoPICjhINIzTIvbItZcy29WqeASkRwblzZ9Fw5gCK e7vp1N161G/xev+F7gayJ6Nuy23ICJCgNUW+Ia/5iBeBTUATc+XSkg4hafRmCF253GV6NQZet KaFUxTQ/TM52py3uYE8rsZ8+EjNwBmi5s7VR7Vgr9T2DxJjLV2bWKVEu8PLK5zgO3p2glouwX 76d2tI2GgbA0qVM8qSJXuvzajanMsCbhdD/0S3bMyEcJcZPxJ6IKr0fQiPtr+93fAuiVHwcjR ne1QWVfXoilWpw/E3TwIJKn7X7vJ3rl9h/vitledYdm9w9pFp3isZo4aerLZUP2vmZrKlIykU /2UZuNZBR7ujJutATY5NJ38L+cUtzDtsvw19s/ppbSh/HQZUZv0I7OixLkHPU+3BqRmSXt3Am EzsuenmWHrN2C5KSEFjYDiId2SyyJXzFx+en00esQtwLLddSJbyox8yRsTcB9LGsjKidJX1j8 S2kS3xCJoUyfn1fX4HxnB4SUmzFHD/Kf65Qbzy7PRaTVuaXKx8qIfwfaPqg3wlup5lspQZUA0 Z1BgyQmSOiNW3AaoDRBJGGgP+tHglUvcBG0jxkvl08WM6gWxb9KGZ/pz4SWDK/RsFAd3FDBpM nhyrLbtLAhoWGq8cFDvpVis48CVnqMU6Y8SZkyM4PvWnBb8dxOPl1V48Exj365QgQJ3Fv+p8h 5DwU009wGI8AWAAQkJfNx4TFl/SbnxHzQgTbVP2J37s+oN35b17Sjpp2tmZBSHXmVNN+eDIgN hTNs7mYyeqKjgQgr+jcAFMCmFCF5KqCVjdScYLYlrrLvwTGkg+H9KGehPJHu0uAIFFgnvryXT zFgZf5/valfnXbLEtkRrQqntnBI0YXLRaIWVEkR/3CPYszEzuwxzWLwYK6HuQEAHv31G4K+iW iP2vPd7OhVigRfz5x7a5AXxVD3VlWupvx0ukjQfMCI/rL+cLJnXOzPxScLGQWJNcs7NNVBLbw s3zY4L5cca7RYM4s9H6esn2vnQbQ6SjWqF5osrvcQflEyFc3QZR/4X8Bc2yXMiIVFDQ7YsoMD vSSLYybI3+Fw+9M7ENPDEx6MH2s+AsGeyAuQ7No/y3m63dOjKutAK3bvTeR9Vtc+qooqFg6HR +PF3sCHzOUxBFs5vydCNaeWjITSr7GQaBxIkYOkxnAV2ZY48N521IYeSy1sVVQAF2giWIAcbG edVn3SZMmLGN30RDJYON1aF2+xw5rIZbU3YNBp6V4N3yXzpM5BpaBSUW1+6EKpvac/mWeXGkf hmDvpuODZ7gAEMs1L/nG6uhMk+LG88L9vKDDR49YW+xPQWwOZC0p7BSMtY0IuiFTBBajeKpoJ aL3inwr8d4xc2MEjFbrbB6Jq66ElxKynP15v3/Ds0F0PYdA36jVoAqA7lcjnMcnVQj/qhu3aU oUrLi9Z6gHcUt1Danck2XA+ZLiQ9R9/DXoNoiL0YwyGGGIlBj7ZRFYwWW9ItbyXS/QkxU9ic/ gAX+Mn2BndmOLz7PNm69csGxnyggEH9iCjrDumip/VWhzgNkQvO43ejEGBwsIxWGQTYkbTgaZ 4wjsGEUBJVK0B8c+yqA8Y2htN18mBK+O0Y0Lx+057TzV/pWZIjfgzd568qvaTAjqtGM+yy53n 8x1oksxPKXZTX/TjZ/sruzsLowR6HhDjzrwCBBnd9xeyrfXf/0cBbYrYx049C4Xhz8N4405xl eBwXhOtLTu5vnCDQ9+FxJJ69A9gvSpBKe9cZ7GwbG36pMJbx2+QztnMqH1Ivfy9FpeT9Xs+c2 xudMros3d97Myw9xZqMjcw/GXUcPi+BOEWe33ulR2wdxrQKnm88FeK1KN49gyV+GnzqRgJ3D7 oQTvbpHgXyZt0Y76VKJwxY0T3v5BJWXr5oX34aFo/tt X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Am 21.04.25 um 16:07 schrieb Liliana Marie Prikler: > as the date for the GCD 003 was set to February 18th, the discussion > period actually ended on Saturday already. I have incorporated some > changes on Sunday to realign the proposal with GCD 002 (the Codeberg > one), but barring any emergency changes there, GCD 003 is now to be > considered final. >=20 > As outlined in GCD 001, please respond to this mail with one of the > following: >=20 > - =E2=80=9CI support=E2=80=9D, meaning that you support the proposal; > - =E2=80=9CI accept=E2=80=9D, meaning that you consent to the implementa= tion of the > proposal; > - =E2=80=9CI disapprove=E2=80=9D, meaning that you oppose the implementa= tion of the > proposal. I disapprove. ~Jonathan
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2025 06:45:10 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 29 02:45:10 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46427 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1u9eiK-0004CI-E0 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 02:45:10 -0400 Received: from lepiller.eu ([2a00:5884:8208::1]:55916 helo=hermes.lepiller.eu) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <julien@HIDDEN>) id 1u9eiE-00049p-Ro for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 02:45:05 -0400 Received: from hermes.lepiller.eu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hermes.lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 302baf51; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 06:44:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=lepiller.eu; h=date:from :to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=dkim; bh=v6kLDTmtRumZ qPmPQOFeU1u+e7HqHXb6JT5jD6u6ixU=; b=P3jNqeoaZcM80eaobl5LxH0H2Ws6 gCPDA8gae+AylVw519RjFUZ/TLtZrekqA7GtDrYyEHiFTTIkRapJ9onuCh3HXorm ZrlwN0ljGsS54+R1VIftmA6UwnKdfDUEzgFHKc+e/y7H+bH6O3ZUlLuj2vlmjjLH d6G6HPNDP4IVwS/RCoPaplecUBPeWVEC6t6mVdlGgTnEG3J56NqTTba6MgIgaag2 KDFCuu/s01y1ZQVLzlLLodUtKdxR1Yu1bHJPrJEs52igIOcZT4PnQvfsgGi4B68z ciFGrmLstUp+wCfpg3Q++fJisIEKMtG1hHBkoWwoD7lN5yEPZ2Wt2Kr8dw== Received: by hermes.lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 1e534825 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Tue, 29 Apr 2025 06:44:57 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 08:44:55 +0200 From: Julien Lepiller <julien@HIDDEN> To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: Deliberation period for GCD 003 "Rename the default branch" has technically started Message-ID: <20250429084455.58104cd1@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> References: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.43; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: guix-devel@HIDDEN, info-guix@HIDDEN, 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) I accept
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Apr 2025 09:37:56 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 28 05:37:55 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53708 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1u9Kvx-0001X1-PG for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2025 05:37:55 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:49847) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <glv@HIDDEN>) id 1u9Kvu-0001Vi-32 for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2025 05:37:51 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6581240103 for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 2025 11:37:42 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1745833062; bh=Q/sVdPl9rjPuL4bsLOajSFhfKjF3vZHdQKbAlpe/Doo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: From; b=ErynBgMvb2W9cHcIo+bG2O3RUDIq+WdI6QAoqTIGtDP0vcY9ngVSxG09swY5cyYaw zR0H/2DYEtSOGMQs9Zn8nxG+0jffUd/Lpi1PtSLQMBMThjSWpvITCBVCtZbQFfnTCM 4xfmbJy0WuWxNfhvlKTHPUqcALoe5eWRI5COsnHI5y10QTuFn3wCWjKc359UU1NQve pnKZiyDzBw6O//OvmqfzOEJ4PPiVLv4Qk0aV1cHYAqPy/L0wIOflj3ALU3yXeY6QpM i6z4WzA831zCqK8VroEyw/dmEl+ijz+fV4i+B64EHy1iVlYTgkH1IVIHBN8gIm15ES PlWBRX+OeOIBQ== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4ZmJJj451Pz9rxR; Mon, 28 Apr 2025 11:37:41 +0200 (CEST) From: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv@HIDDEN> To: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: Deliberation period for GCD 003 "Rename the default branch" has technically started In-Reply-To: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> (Liliana Marie Prikler's message of "Mon, 21 Apr 2025 16:07:14 +0200") References: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 09:37:32 +0000 Message-ID: <87a580mxsz.fsf@kitej> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: guix-devel@HIDDEN X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> skribis: > Hi Guix, > > as the date for the GCD 003 was set to February 18th, the discussion > period actually ended on Saturday already. I have incorporated some > changes on Sunday to realign the proposal with GCD 002 (the Codeberg > one), but barring any emergency changes there, GCD 003 is now to be > considered final. > > As outlined in GCD 001, please respond to this mail with one of the > following: > > - =E2=80=9CI support=E2=80=9D, meaning that you support the proposal; > - =E2=80=9CI accept=E2=80=9D, meaning that you consent to the implementat= ion of the > proposal; > - =E2=80=9CI disapprove=E2=80=9D, meaning that you oppose the implementat= ion of the > proposal. > > To count my own vote, I support the change of the default branch name > to =E2=80=9Cmain=E2=80=9D. > > Cheers I accept. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEAREKAC0WIQTLxZxm7Ce5cXlAaz5r6CCK3yH+PwUCaA9MXA8cZ2x2QHBvc3Rl by5uZXQACgkQa+ggit8h/j9fzwD9F9JRhiK2UfbjBFT/7f2dwUX0TVxoWlzGKfLK Mb+X69AA/02xQdk6ZfeHsQVK/rKPWK7CuAyJlc8wwKDDwaqkznTC =Bj40 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Apr 2025 22:41:59 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 27 18:41:59 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45734 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1u9AhD-00026p-8u
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Apr 2025 18:41:59 -0400
Received: from mail-lf1-x135.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::135]:48491)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <sharlatanus@HIDDEN>)
id 1u9AhA-00026T-74
for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Apr 2025 18:41:57 -0400
Received: by mail-lf1-x135.google.com with SMTP id
2adb3069b0e04-54d65cb6e8aso5340660e87.1
for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 27 Apr 2025 15:41:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1745793709; x=1746398509; darn=debbugs.gnu.org;
h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject
:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=kiD4vt14kKBc5ykD74oZygdfnny7DfbRJ5dw92WwbZU=;
b=Xk7BVeYdsy0Db1FfjW5FrUCy3hOlxI70Lmz8LxObz3XTj3LoeqG/r5+u8cj6ciCAYC
nEIP33d6Wavn+G0FbIVldQDSNwuEiB+PuIGNUVGOJUJSwt9Kdaf73MEpuUZfWq12QzzU
IHXpSUpUGnYVl1gpOdgZExOoVYTItoctxiJWiHlPg9FUVWQeGN3drgGZ/Js+Sb9hO84w
IqLEF2vZUcRI+GKYI3IuP8xzjedA3ApPpjQhrhhWSd0GmQdNvtB6JHd/ikk3HCunXXly
Sf9K21DXLnSdbqoUZcMROjwysrMYEtc5CwNwAao7GGUzB2TvV2M4Dao/izx6YXDOt4ny
lh6g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1745793709; x=1746398509;
h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state
:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=kiD4vt14kKBc5ykD74oZygdfnny7DfbRJ5dw92WwbZU=;
b=JCGtEM+7sHIKJN4HJ8WefDSgHhMkyG3AbxUixQhjzTvZ3pllxpIySDK2mmqKMLsHHv
EoD/8c7mh+hdVfVFoQg+PU177mlh5LTjNAwNTtZ4c8ywpkKihPNJ0UW6CpUW7nywjaww
MlvY1+B7M/K0VnexQ9NqNnxrVHbcT6iyYO9nFEaeonb0jafpuSzB8uSVxUclynsdA+Qv
4eya55YNvWUjVqu5ECtimMmRdbGkIHU4ir42GGUP4Pte+OK2nGD0dA7aQ43Ao5YA3XFV
o4CJUMvNwgQX4AmhpXilF5Vt4rU64RYoP1h3Zx6j3MCYU3FWGItknguxHn0z68luq6pL
B2HQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyxLovbQ/5qXFZ9mZjmANdxxp87R+rOvkYGO0YiJkLNStJTZJyh
ymCMO+gbUUPk4wdQaDX2DpJUXMJvhyY+mSzdEVwzoTuWppwPHY0l6fv/vELlsmnQmOnUiI3f4pT
Qt3zS9OFZDSNJeClAPZh3fIpfh7etKugW
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncudzI7bTgrzJk3JCOAN69+lwEAWifLf1MT9nW+6Sj+JE3dQgDFxp5gTnLP0pZw
bhZJZEonys4jpTynJAWmPAJjTjWdjSzRy1qbPE3DHHGOQmma9J4c3srF6rrvMX2sYoQExJSZASd
hHHmHFBKi/blViaTPaR107
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHmFfvlHAWbPIOm3iaMm0YDyKngn+PVWGW0bzA31Pt9EU8+VRQZkNs7r0JUXbThQZ8tzr7h630dgwblEuvrOCY=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:2356:b0:54a:fa58:a6f4 with SMTP id
2adb3069b0e04-54e8cbd5ce8mr3158067e87.24.1745793708809; Sun, 27 Apr 2025
15:41:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Sharlatan Hellseher <sharlatanus@HIDDEN>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2025 23:41:37 +0100
X-Gm-Features: ATxdqUEQG6gOc6aHM_qK7mwp4lW-EEf_vyu5lN8G4lQr66LhCzGy2d8ViLIWM3k
Message-ID: <CAO+9K5oc9b-rNB=Oqi3TV93Lmb99E3nDM=buxCTbEdnd6nz-QQ@HIDDEN>
Subject: [GCD] A better name for the default branch
To: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000dd65b60633ca452a"
X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Hi, Keeping as it is,
no support on this GCD from me. As aikido
practitioner and sound engineer I would suprise to call my teacher main or
trunk instead of master or Sensei ;-) Same in sound - mastering - moving
from raw to production state.
Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust [2a00:1450:4864:20:0:0:0:135 listed in]
[list.dnswl.org]
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
provider (sharlatanus[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs
[URI: github.incerto.xyz (xyz)]
0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
2.5 MIXED_ES Too many es are not es
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Hi, Keeping as it is, no support on this GCD from me. As aikido
practitioner and sound engineer I would suprise to call my teacher main or
trunk instead of master or Sensei ;-) Same in sound - mastering - moving
from raw to production state.
Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust
[2a00:1450:4864:20:0:0:0:135 listed in]
[list.dnswl.org]
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
provider (sharlatanus[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs
[URI: github.incerto.xyz (xyz)]
0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
2.5 MIXED_ES Too many es are not es
-1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
manager
--000000000000dd65b60633ca452a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64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==
--000000000000dd65b60633ca452a
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64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--000000000000dd65b60633ca452a--
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Apr 2025 19:16:20 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 27 15:16:20 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44662 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1u97UB-0005tm-JO for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Apr 2025 15:16:19 -0400 Received: from sender-pp-o94.zoho.in ([103.117.158.94]:2149) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ashvithshetty0010@HIDDEN>) id 1u97U8-0005tL-QE for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Apr 2025 15:16:17 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1745781363; cv=none; d=zohomail.in; s=zohoarc; b=eY+P7jYgOIZzw8k/tVk5dLNHEeSNCgp+dXTSKWFa3+i18C0mRxCQZNvR/vfh+ccnsSJ6MygvDkWs4CbRtfNdDqJCj4h5M43P3ScfVGr60eWuzYc7utbYxFkbEGqxHo0UA5eAqrT/h3Qb860Je75lQ4/G/wh7z8QWEBZ3pvkqPN8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.in; s=zohoarc; t=1745781363; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:From:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:Subject:To:To:Message-Id:Reply-To; bh=sDjcsBg1/qC774yoUZkZ0cWr5PU+c0CyNT4rivE1D8g=; b=HjoJgNVNfWHs2tTyDx+QIkBKHD2hn9sJb+4pdhwhy/2n9wrOezUr3Sz3xbV4I/dcXuj3T1UQDUr/OqFEUikVZIpJmaWB1taTcyg+3aM6rs8kyD2vJTfBm84UxDhR108Q+wVcpdrEPjcpkDCi9lN1HHUdSRP30PFoPPJwcOJnkDA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.in; dkim=pass header.i=zohomail.in; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ashvithshetty0010@HIDDEN; dmarc=pass header.from=<ashvithshetty0010@HIDDEN> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1745781363; s=zoho; d=zohomail.in; i=ashvithshetty0010@HIDDEN; h=Message-ID:Subject:Subject:From:From:To:To:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Message-Id:Reply-To; bh=sDjcsBg1/qC774yoUZkZ0cWr5PU+c0CyNT4rivE1D8g=; b=beEEGmpamkDolvV4la6bvJA14d5kyIdEd6REacowrZBNRY0dhmBxCXXG+Ddg+cZX ArQZV+QG3V/lO8V6K+/2k67DC6mQyln9tcD3zXTZmZC8LYXFSbWZ4Ne+1OWb/SaedTB zp49+JBs1s+PStdr2ecqb8bXENI5F5c6EIKMaZc4= Received: by mx.zoho.in with SMTPS id 1745781361138115.55410772676646; Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:46:01 +0530 (IST) Message-ID: <6319761f7be73d6d00a71669fc7bf01317432576.camel@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: Deliberation period for GCD 003 "Rename the default branch" has technically started From: Ashvith Shetty <ashvithshetty0010@HIDDEN> To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:46:00 +0530 In-Reply-To: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> References: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.54.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello, On Mon, 2025-04-21 at 16:07 +0200, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: > Hi Guix, >=20 > as the date for the GCD 003 was set to February 18th, the discussion > period actually ended on Saturday already.=C2=A0 I have incorporated some > changes on Sunday to realign the proposal with GCD 002 (the Codeberg > one), but barring any emergency changes there, GCD 003 is now to be > considered final. >=20 > As outlined in GCD 001, please respond to this mail with one of the > following: >=20 > - =E2=80=9CI support=E2=80=9D, meaning that you support the proposal; > - =E2=80=9CI accept=E2=80=9D, meaning that you consent to the implementat= ion of the > =C2=A0 proposal; > - =E2=80=9CI disapprove=E2=80=9D, meaning that you oppose the implementat= ion of the > =C2=A0 proposal. >=20 > To count my own vote, I support the change of the default branch name > to =E2=80=9Cmain=E2=80=9D. >=20 > Cheers >=20 I support. Regards, Ashvith
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Apr 2025 15:03:05 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 27 11:03:05 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43524 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1u93X7-0006iX-9Q for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Apr 2025 11:03:05 -0400 Received: from smtp-bc0e.mail.infomaniak.ch ([2001:1600:4:17::bc0e]:34769) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <tanguy@HIDDEN>) id 1u93X4-0006hu-IH for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Apr 2025 11:03:03 -0400 Received: from smtp-3-0000.mail.infomaniak.ch (smtp-3-0000.mail.infomaniak.ch [10.4.36.107]) by smtp-3-3000.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ZlqZQ4JVVzl7V; Sun, 27 Apr 2025 17:02:54 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bioneland.org; s=20230804; t=1745766174; bh=h1B0/f3uXPEZxFeS4w3Z3iCgyjUpqCzvayqXQtzGX9Y=; h=Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=eVzLwPQG04p+NOkAl9YkbFglzxlD0mYG1PatkGrjPJ98pJWfbdeGrnrSJ4caltoNY Ts8XT8R/ENTo9VNI90YhlpHlGonedOG+ttSB+YkH09X0bv2FJJMHpmiBCiwHSaMkAJ gu+o8tBHJgck9VsZvgBiRps4yjn4LXNPF6MKIYi/adpjd6PHUqJKiSpPHGB7ZRTEeE Oi0NE/ifeRskcLTcTNJzzFjPyZojJqDEqCwaJGUdSgOAqQdnfP3H0r3eWDz7iguppT UEq8QT2GeeRySB1nEUnHM4egO9vRP9BKMMysnJTYf1xjTiu8fLA9Q37Kgy5TR2Ee1O vDjT2/+vKu/aw== Received: from unknown by smtp-3-0000.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4ZlqZQ13wzzbwb; Sun, 27 Apr 2025 17:02:54 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2025 17:02:53 +0200 Message-Id: <D9HIGKGW52DS.2HZGOU82H3XFO@HIDDEN> To: "Liliana Marie Prikler" <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>, <guix-devel@HIDDEN> From: "Tanguy Le Carrour" <tanguy@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: Deliberation period for GCD 003 "Rename the default branch" has technically started X-Mailer: aerc 0.20.1 References: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> X-Infomaniak-Routing: alpha X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) I accept. On Mon Apr 21, 2025 at 4:07 PM CEST, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: > as the date for the GCD 003 was set to February 18th, the discussion > period actually ended on Saturday already. I have incorporated some > changes on Sunday to realign the proposal with GCD 002 (the Codeberg > one), but barring any emergency changes there, GCD 003 is now to be > considered final. > > As outlined in GCD 001, please respond to this mail with one of the > following: > > - =E2=80=9CI support=E2=80=9D, meaning that you support the proposal; > - =E2=80=9CI accept=E2=80=9D, meaning that you consent to the implementat= ion of the > proposal; > - =E2=80=9CI disapprove=E2=80=9D, meaning that you oppose the implementat= ion of the > proposal. > > To count my own vote, I support the change of the default branch name > to =E2=80=9Cmain=E2=80=9D. > > Cheers
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Apr 2025 13:35:58 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 27 09:35:58 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40519 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1u92Ao-0000G5-9m for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Apr 2025 09:35:58 -0400 Received: from cotopaxi.ee.ethz.ch ([129.132.148.196]:44127) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <gabriel@HIDDEN>) id 1u92Aj-0000FC-VZ for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Apr 2025 09:35:55 -0400 Received: from blackbox (212-51-128-25.fiber7.init7.net [212.51.128.25]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: gabriel) by cotopaxi.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EBCE3204E0 for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 27 Apr 2025 15:35:43 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=erlikon.ch; s=20250312; t=1745760945; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=Cuh5HxAkvHVIjfDfzSO28JwVC6rPejbW5p9QWu5OqlY=; b=aw3J096rEIZoJX+iGVVdwHJ7FyuokqcttKqn/AjXmhNyf7270R0XioJDHGRj8Roi5ndEjw iwZ9bs3d+2e2e0EsgbLTcuVUdH8CCGNP5eXElIIGnZv2b7oSJxRPp78IaPsXpFGuMXmsH6 s9kMchdlouMyU2UL7+HGfzrLVDtHzfEu4Wo6+xNXIjVpejgNLKBgeCH7hW5CA4KghFCnTc lh2DmhpwcXK2BtAEOCNiu2oiGbPBWHktX7/vzue3UidrPMPnGr6gO4k16+otF+hkY7ZESU iwhqYYpwpBA4D8jM8A6GndalQB82UikmVXd5ZUKR46DBMAmiO3jGu6tv6Gyoyb5xAh8JzK wXQnvnL8NKoI5QO7ylIOFHICdMBk8tj0KSeH1te7jaB6T9lGojcWF8UzUxsVd3A1NnAM/X Xk/YUHKQclQx340m36Y83RSxe3gTh8c/lqdforHwbsrZ53UlymGRXQDLTJpG1tc8cTR/mq Al7qjJPDXvmGwAHZ3wP/nFeYYi9sTGLBj9F7FRptIqbmtgQ5gW6JXZDtMBs/R/oEkOFkCW OZjkVyn/+VDurPdU50DwhjwLDpzZc/L1JQ/pbMmAJuYRCGuW1Yg8usvSlNDvToOzIez5bB UqLL75dt5ZTGIHO2pb9PrSJNYGq5tJJQt9vgFn/Htnrkgs6ePP7i0= From: Gabriel Wicki <gabriel@HIDDEN> To: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2025 15:35:43 +0200 Message-ID: <87frhtohg0.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I follow what I understood of the opinions of Steve/futurile and Simon Tournier here. I approve. Or actually I don't know but I guess "I approve" fits best? I don't want this to fail just because of me stating my opinion but I find the amount of political discussion (on cultural/historical topics [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. [129.132.148.196 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com] 0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. [129.132.148.196 listed in sa-trusted.bondedsender.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) I follow what I understood of the opinions of Steve/futurile and Simon Tournier here. I approve. Or actually I don't know but I guess "I approve" fits best? I don't want this to fail just because of me stating my opinion but I find the amount of political discussion (on cultural/historical topics of the angloshpere) not qualified to be held in this arena of contributors to a free software project. These discussions tend to divide more than they bring us together. Let's try to stick to the GNU Kind Communications Guidelines[0] even more. [0] https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/kind-communication.en.html
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Apr 2025 12:54:29 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 27 08:54:29 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40286 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1u91We-0002no-Tz for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Apr 2025 08:54:29 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44766) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <janneke@HIDDEN>) id 1u91Wc-0002nD-Rg for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Apr 2025 08:54:27 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <janneke@HIDDEN>) id 1u91WW-0004vs-OR; Sun, 27 Apr 2025 08:54:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=zd3AjA2Vnfy/Q0B3OfzoHpkN1C0w9+hIcPbCgIEkxok=; b=aBIDoY4N7MuRRFtu6bh+ j13CmSGSASsvhGIcsffC6aSUMNnX5wf6XRooezpNDs1kaEnna/Y5JS+TfSOUfeSVRfok48z/xKljH ISn2/rdiGR4XZSY32/KaliM4OwWI0oXMb6+hsI2GA61UoMs8tFtr2EbAM29be17L2BzBq071KmbUw gT38ey8K964vqX+/HJNEys5wRnZGibC1k5pABy/XUb9hQxPVHvYDBXgnJXwBiX9DupTGGI5r4r0uT 2RHoz8ULS/MWT2Fr3nwjYLEMrUmHE2x0Z7fwGSXxZB6GJQKjVaw3ZbdMkthk2IE9lDDr5HEvA9V4b zoRwcvdyZo4t6A==; From: Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: Deliberation period for GCD 003 "Rename the default branch" has technically started In-Reply-To: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> (Liliana Marie Prikler's message of "Mon, 21 Apr 2025 16:07:14 +0200") Organization: AvatarAcademy.nl References: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> X-Url: http://AvatarAcademy.nl Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2025 14:54:18 +0200 Message-ID: <87wmb5zrwl.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: guix-devel@HIDDEN, 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Liliana Marie Prikler writes: > as the date for the GCD 003 was set to February 18th, the discussion > period actually ended on Saturday already. I have incorporated some > changes on Sunday to realign the proposal with GCD 002 (the Codeberg > one), but barring any emergency changes there, GCD 003 is now to be > considered final. I accept. Greetings, Janneke --=20 Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> | GNU LilyPond https://LilyPond.org Freelance IT https://www.JoyOfSource.com | Avatar=C2=AE https://AvatarAcade= my.com
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Apr 2025 12:03:07 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 27 08:03:07 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39940 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1u90iw-0007vo-Kq for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Apr 2025 08:03:06 -0400 Received: from mail-yb1-xb2b.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2b]:51678) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <laurent.gatto@HIDDEN>) id 1u90it-0007v6-Vl for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Apr 2025 08:03:04 -0400 Received: by mail-yb1-xb2b.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-e72cc45d99cso3389967276.3 for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 27 Apr 2025 05:03:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1745755378; x=1746360178; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=ErwxPfGwM3UTi8TY1v0VJ9OSWsa0ierq0NfKXJ/qyGk=; b=dD2dH991HczCUYNygPKeYqcgz4g9c2fJkG6qeoDyMGE9mWKirZVgdUY0rg75RzEFve bfV715rRt4X66j/hOXP3p7Us2PFx6ImTQQkyxUb090T2TI/vHoXleUhX+y4qKQR0jYM4 FQxG1CbMtNPzkt1BFVy7si3TUILoi4WcnyAvuoGmG4KXeqdHZQwDuKIT5WYfzIf39NBj FsxAoV3JWY+Q9FR5jiA0XjmJxSJaYJmTl3pLGHwYKeTgzoCPl+w9fqyqG6U6CLYSWXSR +1io65pAk1mSmZS3hrRfqjGXBC5z98t/G4dnI48H5EeCJilDZZt/84vVnfXtvi/RCrEE HLxg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1745755378; x=1746360178; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ErwxPfGwM3UTi8TY1v0VJ9OSWsa0ierq0NfKXJ/qyGk=; b=qwoqmGAx27cEMSl0YFeuCXxJTE8Ok3vPM3SM092c9HM63zhijmLqp5C8cS3UXPP9tW DoYrJnk3ODqdPk1viQZ/v1fIGQRImHKEjdXlmFIak/mM68evpdJUD9ij5zXSaigzLJtp 65QqzAxH9GDTnyIK0DEGCzlbVZYBGyaqohxarwMWwF+w1MlSx6bdabj3XYc/pLnq1LCh WCFcPcNMBn2T9n3UtIPQ9kI2w9T5MMcJJiXoHzX8mkf4p45f5YNvTIqztXLN7oHGZoAm grKLWFsANQPN4GaodrdAGF0+kkdN6jILxvRkdYNgL0cyPcd1sJY6pnPzcpD0JhaFJNp6 QHMQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxyUksqfk0DLk9eQiI4AdfAQoEfzwLlsgolYHXQN1yFRXfafAvr 6w80CB5QRTDGAuq1UksiCmTP7w5mZeX7ocgWpUh2w3EYJe2iJcqHwcQNAIPkjt+mrUj7DSkmvoZ VIfB3hFGj+rXSF8+wml+yF0WmoHfgJszB X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuxIue4rgoRHd6tovspmhrK1jPbyCWGF1Wo+nejSFQk+nXVuh1ed73ur/TX5Ja 2RPZHfb0Z/Rifu75pXgzeygsJZHSHsSKeDfzI1OGFAgvfzNLpJ/rEwKIB3e2LFmudLVB7naf919 /ICagLJ3hMPF7Lk4fhA/bXh40GU8Z2Lt3CHreiB0uRnpiq6GmTbOYREjSb X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHQDBr9fv3QpY10eTiBJfkLJK2duWIcOMw4u8M8Yf/S2byK82F5WXJ63yFF3BxBcFnQBv58N2oaOXQqAkY8osw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:690c:708d:b0:6ff:1c8d:fbfc with SMTP id 00721157ae682-7085f23fde5mr77359377b3.31.1745755377896; Sun, 27 Apr 2025 05:02:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> From: Laurent Gatto <laurent.gatto@HIDDEN> Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2025 14:02:31 +0200 X-Gm-Features: ATxdqUFku6-ty2tx5jhRUD8LdkfGxso_BF8GRQVtyz0WUe4cB1W7EBFAolTc3Zg Message-ID: <CA+uNOzj-KV_Ketz+jA3r4U1gONn+Vbu-cYLzZ=zdxawufXd84Q@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: Deliberation period for GCD 003 "Rename the default branch" has technically started To: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: guix-devel@HIDDEN, info-guix@HIDDEN X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) I support. On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 at 16:07, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> wrote: > > Hi Guix, > > as the date for the GCD 003 was set to February 18th, the discussion > period actually ended on Saturday already. I have incorporated some > changes on Sunday to realign the proposal with GCD 002 (the Codeberg > one), but barring any emergency changes there, GCD 003 is now to be > considered final. > > As outlined in GCD 001, please respond to this mail with one of the > following: > > - =E2=80=9CI support=E2=80=9D, meaning that you support the proposal; > - =E2=80=9CI accept=E2=80=9D, meaning that you consent to the implementat= ion of the > proposal; > - =E2=80=9CI disapprove=E2=80=9D, meaning that you oppose the implementat= ion of the > proposal. > > To count my own vote, I support the change of the default branch name > to =E2=80=9Cmain=E2=80=9D. > > Cheers >
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Apr 2025 15:48:30 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Apr 23 11:48:30 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58417 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1u7cKo-0007Up-Cr
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 11:48:29 -0400
Received: from mail-wr1-x42d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42d]:45264)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>)
id 1u7cKW-0007Qz-Rc
for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 11:48:13 -0400
Received: by mail-wr1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id
ffacd0b85a97d-39c0dfad22aso4828573f8f.2
for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 08:48:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1745423283; x=1746028083; darn=debbugs.gnu.org;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references
:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
:reply-to; bh=HyReAhDd2Ll4HyrqhUNL/mYGUv2pqaCdzGELvPMelJM=;
b=XSfQY3Mu4ZzHtzMcutxsmGKeUGAJmfUEE30CZ6cwguTjkCUgyP4vLMvNRRHYOuolB9
S6TCN5P7xhxq8Rp9RaDTIt6pUIhP/2FkAANbBR6wzN6L81AEbP3dT2wIfi7HBtW6hqGK
aSZtlAT+1/S/2VdPUTihnwHdPqZE6aaqC1hw86eDMkz5goTemA6tqUW9X6wmMT9Cw8m/
6OPEupa35DcgiYIe4YKOCBpp5ucQJahVCq7NiNVCcSIlnP1Tv0zmahes0hgHcsXJrZTi
81ItO3th9MTpv7jKEK5s4ppOCOFH9sq39hmon5dM4/FR6Icc47QlIkmlmxKIN9Upe7eu
NJXA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1745423283; x=1746028083;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references
:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=HyReAhDd2Ll4HyrqhUNL/mYGUv2pqaCdzGELvPMelJM=;
b=n1Mez0eet//8Di6E4A3zLWDHYqxqOK29EevpLwnIJFJYfB0fcQJF8EmL3IdJOWSSU0
tvpSwPXQUWK9f2QBNZN771cHp24w1mBxOVIFfHm52lV1ZD0pAJKNrWclpSXy11kiDlB3
vrXgVDtxtYu6XV1/ODEb1ckOqxP0AbkQWfm2tsQMnDO+Lokq58PC0/k0NYcxV5cLbmLC
QrJFuNojABDlcupQ3onMqRAc9gjFPpQ8nDvDPRFw/9p1YGlbQIMcGdxn9jcKoCf8P5dc
rbEtpIiahZFwN4VxsTXJr2d7SDOu1WnpQV2UaAfUSxoN+pkSOUW/sXRoLlBVc58Tkp2w
TVFw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy7OvMlcTp5lu34Od/29QGt/IzGttDrdC6YLI81UaZ5DFUZFsW/
JVUFYxUHdKyxyoR6w453EDr4Fx9dI4OLpB0kxmU+Xbmi73XM6NINnihO5Q==
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncujnqADcThXsrxUm/rgGDF/0kNGlYXuS/F+1NN/bSTinA8zT6Q91cDuRHxNFmW
1SbS8LWWVNylh9MV5o94iPlnqHDK0iqpqD8X3crjkIaJ/lW/5XQuvpQQESlv4quAzWtOdGZHpTf
QmOPECc1Bcv1MtUmGwPDp2MnBYYvhJzjUSlfmb2E6Sl9jH6TAlJcgMrvq5fpi15BRp0eSND0NzS
sAo1VACq0iGwzfVhnp+RUDQ6vBqclRYNw9hAvF5qFxcMHNVY0nC/w1XqID1lZVNMX6g7Qwi5mKf
Q4gFSpnq0EukR3OZ1Q0O17i+7x4+zy0CGsSkeOKLWPN0yR9kfTc5PQ0EW+v1PQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFHYECXtvQwC3iQ/t7QnWTmeFDaztXGwssGWglSvnOfiRqOGvK2KzQJombmlS5ml47849UbpA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:18ae:b0:39c:2661:4ce0 with SMTP id
ffacd0b85a97d-3a06c3841d8mr89256f8f.13.1745423282288;
Wed, 23 Apr 2025 08:48:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lili (107.11.220.81.rev.sfr.net. [81.220.11.107])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
ffacd0b85a97d-39efa3a1685sm19160992f8f.0.2025.04.23.08.48.01
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
Wed, 23 Apr 2025 08:48:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
To: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@HIDDEN>, Liliana Marie Prikler
<liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>, guix-devel@HIDDEN, info-guix@HIDDEN
Subject: About GCD process, consensus and derailment (was Re: Deliberation
period for GCD 003 "Rename the default branch" has technically started)
In-Reply-To: <87ecxlqr31.fsf@wireframe>
References: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN>
<87ecxlqr31.fsf@wireframe>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 17:44:39 +0200
Message-ID: <87msc63ms8.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407
Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
Hi Vagrant, all,
On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 at 11:58, Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@HIDDEN> wrote:
> The nature of (at least some of) those responses were largely a negation
> that left little room to discuss how to move forward, which left me at
> an impass as to how to even continue the discussion.
>
> Only in retrospect of having encountered this situation did I realize
> there is a fundamental flaw in the GCD process (at least in my
> opinion)...
I think the fundamental flaw comes from the lack of self-discipline.
Somehow, I=E2=80=99ve seen too: =C2=AB a negation that left little room to =
discuss
how to move forward =C2=BB. Building consensus requires a friendly mindset
of the participants. Did we read that?
> in that there is a presumption of moving forward and
> accepting the proposed changes (in some capacity), rather than
> maintaining the status quo. E.g. a person has to propose improvements in
> order to reject the proposal, but there is nowhere in the process that
> handles a fundamental disagreement about the proposal in any form. This
> is contrary to any other genuine consensus process I have worked with.
As I wrote in [1]:
Why do people need to drag in the discussion =E2=80=93 in no specif=
ic order=E2=80=93:
Black friends, personal history with slavery or dictatorship, opini=
ons
on US imperialism, Gaza massacre, English language, Ukrainian war, a
quote of Frantz Fanon, etc.
Well, from my point of view, the flaw isn=E2=80=99t about =E2=80=9Cproposing
improvements in order to reject the proposal=E2=80=9D, the flaw comes from =
the
inadequate mindset when approaching the proposal. For instance, one
might disagree with the motivations section and instead of locking the
discussion in some confrontational opinions, instead one might frame:
+ Can we rewrite the Motivation section? Because people have Master
degree and the diploma=E2=80=99s not yet renamed, to my knowledge=
. Is the
words master really harmful, racist or sexist?
+ About the Motivation, why not narrow the scope and focus on some
aspects: quoting [-] =C2=AB a) most users leave unchanged the Git=
default
"main", therefore "master" will become increasingly uncommon and
unexpected, b) the choice of "main" is masterfully similar when
tab-completing or looking through a sorted list of refs, and c) t=
he
move to Codeberg presents a hopefully rare opportunity combine
disruptive changes =C2=BB
+ The Motivation appears to me poorly written because I=E2=80=99ve =
never heard
that the term master would be harmful or racist or sexist. Do we=
have
references for backing this claim?
Etc.
Maybe I=E2=80=99m missing something but, IMHO, building consensus requires =
to be
very specific on the document itself. Similarly as we do about patches
=E2=80=93 we do not discuss in the vacuum of the abstract but based on conc=
rete
code; I do not see why it would be fully different for the GCDs.
> Which... is certainly out of scope for GCD 003 "Rename the default
> branch", but because it is a clear example of a flaw of this GCD
> process, figured it was worth noting.
All that said, I agree that the GCD process needs refinements! Well, we
could name these refinements some =E2=80=9Cflaws=E2=80=9D. :-) IMHO, we ne=
ed to bound
the scope =E2=80=9Chow to build consensus=E2=80=9D and we need to reinforce=
the
positions of =C2=AB Sponsor =C2=BB who are the guards against the derailmen=
t.
WDYT? Although we should discuss that elsewhere. :-)
Cheers,
simon
1: [bug#76407] About consensus, again (was Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename the=
default branch)
Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
Wed, 26 Mar 2025 21:20:36 +0100
id:871pujtugb.fsf@HIDDEN
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/76407
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/msgid/871pujtugb.fsf@HIDDEN
https://yhetil.org/guix/871pujtugb.fsf@HIDDEN
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Apr 2025 15:48:17 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Apr 23 11:48:17 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58413 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1u7cKa-0007Se-V7 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 11:48:16 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x32f.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::32f]:42098) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1u7cKU-0007QM-Pc for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 11:48:09 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-43d0359b1fcso224575e9.0 for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 08:48:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1745423280; x=1746028080; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=VBghoZ3O0GKhQn/jQ34PpY+N4dMjBhbvAtamabW32XM=; b=jFIi4iIfWFv1scp06c15Yy8wy1HBMk1wGwRldC68JGLwriRAWgMPiPeQe7pe4o/L6s lRysL83tzQD1q7Io6IwOc3gH7iiVyCcHjs6zaL9RaK/SaVVexan9HDHuTPmdKjq6MBeG 79DgclCj/Qhfbck7Q/t8AS9a1UfOtLz9A7hvGyI17cESHXtL0ygc3y2EQIx0mUxTLeYK 9+ER4M51ZKZ+jNMnTXpj4F5+qXg9ZEQGD88PTFEFsSj4iacpEhrF7hqQwLDLm7liooeo kaPNHLc2pPBHjPE1vvXXjkMk14bwcyFhGi0jHxXLVjfV2VTptf+RVU78xVhAIGlSA2n7 mwbA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1745423280; x=1746028080; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=VBghoZ3O0GKhQn/jQ34PpY+N4dMjBhbvAtamabW32XM=; b=VDTFjRItQovsvKInEvzuWka13DnUJMlugAeaPQl7UG0ZYwfBG5YETF94jc00prBckr 8sBrE1/44nll+iPrMk2Nqr/p7Y982T6bsfiIIPGJ0nZjVTYvbZHWW7RfPm5wS8aRSWff rNLllw8y6lhAZ0vhzcRClg+8pngy1beiYC1qkzzwULLF6mQ+yLCD9/AoqQ3WxGyaVwjt 6nhXncP0u5nx2erWNqPV0q0LdReqq4xNcc2WNU9BY0770LK8kJbP4spCbGy1spuT3z0g nIQeh3GpUyXawIHQvEuqdSOHjNvrLo/3OH0XF03qfMdoaweLCcxLK6YPu2vrLWYdAwqA Ez3A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyHL+zFwhPreQgaGWDJgQTYTH3HexkUILjCXWh/d7DOSpW4TpZI 3LnqlF2lm175sF+jCOtc44boMGeaJu5Rk8Fdqpp7GIfbusyqVariJMPZuQ== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsDm2B7Hp04CpQsQ1lphxrUH9QgwMn/CsbDWOZwJWtcgmj1la/7WZOXhmopDYr 1b8RpZaQhZT5yiKEEZzvCOYR+55OKO4KhQVXfsNyvigl2KSv5W7yE0/lToyKjz8mAmW9gzV7ZSt QR823tWHv9CY1LoGa/32y5Zebq6B2sBEu7GdnejPJL2y8AUby5WkLZmY11Rq716qQ5SrnWzE14w 45a+6Wa32kOgxobXwi433YD/HeXIAThic2H0lhlUAoK3DzbMCpgHic2Dq41HajKFA/swfCZXr73 hg/syZ2fXUDccPnzf0rs4Ia3Zl+HLnfp9iLjI5KPkVPO0HwbzBd1RJG34vyGLifcgpItnvvY X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGtTeI0fNV5n8+lhFRfVuBmkoQnDh9ZYniv0wjgb87KcykI4V+IWEkAo+h/668pUn9271guTg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3d0b:b0:439:8878:5029 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-44091ed703emr30349115e9.2.1745423280342; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 08:48:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili (107.11.220.81.rev.sfr.net. [81.220.11.107]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-39efa4332b2sm19513990f8f.30.2025.04.23.08.47.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 23 Apr 2025 08:48:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>, guix-devel@HIDDEN, info-guix@HIDDEN Subject: Re: Deliberation period for GCD 003 "Rename the default branch" has technically started In-Reply-To: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> References: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 17:15:24 +0200 Message-ID: <87tt6e3o4z.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, I disapprove the current state of the GCD; although I sponsor the GCD and I think renaming from master to main is the right direction. IMHO, the section Motivations would require a complete revamp and technical bits need more adjustments. I hope we will be able to revisit this proposal in the near future keeping in mind that confrontational discussion is helpless and consensus requires self-discipline [1]. Cheers, simon 1: [bug#76407] About consensus, again (was Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename the default branch) Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> Wed, 26 Mar 2025 21:20:36 +0100 id:871pujtugb.fsf@HIDDEN https://issues.guix.gnu.org/76407 https://issues.guix.gnu.org/msgid/871pujtugb.fsf@HIDDEN https://yhetil.org/guix/871pujtugb.fsf@HIDDEN
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Apr 2025 15:01:20 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Apr 23 11:01:20 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58283 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1u7bbE-0007Bi-Bb
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 11:01:20 -0400
Received: from mail-pl1-x635.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::635]:44523)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>)
id 1u7bbA-00079h-RQ
for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 11:01:17 -0400
Received: by mail-pl1-x635.google.com with SMTP id
d9443c01a7336-223fb0f619dso75945245ad.1
for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 08:01:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1745420469; x=1746025269; darn=debbugs.gnu.org;
h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to
:subject:cc:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=22UUtqAU43EsKiKt3f0uopefbleThBXLQvJ1EiwV4Do=;
b=OYneSPUvuG0eY833HSgC72rLOodcBrMCOzXexsDHs97P6fMd7Lgr1XxjFUwSweMf9Y
IccjKkiMrO2lTIlYFy47yVPedgB9Hqy2RRDS/XRDk2/FHqmnsxpTw4aPRJQ/z32AAI6Q
WHvvy9qViJFzCnZdlaEfbGcVRM9e+WD1UdSJbyXHXU2Ph0uoE8VxfKTPYbC7sxiTKogU
99JB03wdEXHDKtX2fakcoGeT80oyA4Rv2w9ju7QRQSWUKgV/Zafvt/t9jiavky8sde0R
jp+EXlf+gZNMZ0BFS3VEyOgdlSEucngTRNNStND3zvW/9peA5Ac4zT5rx0twmnor8vN9
XqPQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1745420469; x=1746025269;
h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to
:subject:cc:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date
:message-id:reply-to;
bh=22UUtqAU43EsKiKt3f0uopefbleThBXLQvJ1EiwV4Do=;
b=IKRj7MkEcUo3CDnluPzeUBDd2DcsJMdonpZIfEw+ZXoqTNBN+FYvzi3ca3s0TA7iTs
xhUv3NIFK2TwtAkEIHrMMS7DlrO0Y4ae4uynZN214WFn4/2cmyL2QZTH/FwvQRwYT3k1
4KZrW89aaP4xeC5Al9/cDk5E/cjXsYSfQXCe9rsElYlUEqMWTqHrNgJPl54Cy8VQEf8L
3nu24sgwb0lD0UtGuuVTSMZKNKytJfxFai1NXBzQc8nAPUyGoxmPMBxqswoI7DJGoHQk
CD27Vg/kfs5Y62QwDo0FBiE04mJokPhalh/tK/nS3gSeovUl+MXIxT0VgL+88GyNrJPZ
UWJw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyq2V2iRZUGP0o9aOFbCDT66Tc8W8LX8d2Hr2AkRbuJovXXbdKL
Isqta3cGMwg4tdbMr9gk1/riC4WUucglCahQCHI2CSwpcTZs8r91i/FGK0c+
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncs1LCA8iF0VND4gtGIaEFZtlNxdn+jIz49Dzh/fAqm24xO5Tc6YqqSDLrgDY/u
jDL8twDJpf09+0xdJAnucEENcvTbVPqofGwzo5S0FFlKsDSS4x3/mZUvs6DG7lOULQtzA9V+/PY
QAnqPGTfhDPuUXvlI3fd76seSp16uW6qqoA3EzIonqh6HMXWnptmiGb3Ea8a7yXLbWPpK9e+rai
G7I3EfW9kCTjfCTbCe92J2FhM8LPdyPUS2Lm8D1dKslJqiTphMpq3chgROuQHlE8f/ZWRJc1nRF
qdZD7YK3P/DzVxMswGCHEpXuzm7Gt3MFCM9zYi8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHgAdJKgeaMUcscrA50rBnR2SjPVA2XrvUAQtREbjodvAhujMh0WC9xjFd1m8n3SfO3472foQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:3203:b0:220:e9ac:e746 with SMTP id
d9443c01a7336-22c5365a2edmr310762595ad.53.1745420469377;
Wed, 23 Apr 2025 08:01:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from terra ([2405:6586:be0:0:83c8:d31d:2cec:f542])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
d9443c01a7336-22c50bf3fffsm105379465ad.91.2025.04.23.08.01.07
for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
Wed, 23 Apr 2025 08:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: Deliberation period for GCD 003 "Rename the default branch" has
technically started
In-Reply-To: <87h62gbq63.fsf@HIDDEN> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Tue, 22
Apr 2025 03:39:21 -0400")
References: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN>
<87h62gbq63.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 00:01:06 +0900
Message-ID: <87tt6eudl9.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 3.3 (+++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: I accept. -- Thanks, Maxim
Content analysis details: (3.3 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust [2607:f8b0:4864:20:0:0:0:635 listed in]
[list.dnswl.org]
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
provider (maxim.cournoyer[at]gmail.com)
0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.2 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header
2.0 MALFORMED_FREEMAIL Bad headers on message from free email
service
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407
Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 2.3 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: I accept. -- Thanks, Maxim
Content analysis details: (2.3 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust
[2607:f8b0:4864:20:0:0:0:635 listed in]
[list.dnswl.org]
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
provider (maxim.cournoyer[at]gmail.com)
0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.2 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header
2.0 MALFORMED_FREEMAIL Bad headers on message from free email
service
-1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
manager
I accept.
--
Thanks,
Maxim
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Apr 2025 11:23:33 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Apr 23 07:23:33 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54694 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1u7YCS-0001U9-NA for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 07:23:33 -0400 Received: from mail.boiledscript.com ([2a01:4f8:242:4aeb::42]:57650) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <hako@HIDDEN>) id 1u7YCO-0001TL-HV for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 07:23:29 -0400 Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 19:20:37 +0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ultrarare.space; s=mail; t=1745407406; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Y3jxFx4odnVBi6G+JDiL7Hk8G7AevrwY7H0nHr7hHoM=; b=YQvcLEWGKXwqzgsmwaxCEL1PjZXvsC1l3OWxV0GBGMvnYiFEcpD3KBz+7KQG9cxZrVwUvn OzdITx6NtVKG/OdoMIxZQPgJWmDkIzlwHOxx/+9YGnH4bMeKKCQ7rmi6AwlvwugX2hlsAa nfasIrmCWkcDoelCnneIShcHQSKxDkKeNFA5JXpBJafBicoZGL4O7tXLL9zORpDYudjXg+ EYirmSZN3ZhYc4rZk/sdtdhzWvE3D7WTAElZ2G06XSeFH/eoAcvFMk5cJGeb9p+izlpDd2 vduvyUC3Rw9vTPYYuIjQurGDUR+y3V0FWmmSFm9aiTimdmql9xzE3t9XrqCGaA== Message-ID: <87r01jjf96.wl-hako@HIDDEN> From: Hilton Chain <hako@HIDDEN> To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: Deliberation period for GCD 003 "Rename the default branch" has technically started In-Reply-To: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> References: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: guix-devel@HIDDEN, 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 22:07:14 +0800, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: > > Hi Guix, > > as the date for the GCD 003 was set to February 18th, the discussion > period actually ended on Saturday already. I have incorporated some > changes on Sunday to realign the proposal with GCD 002 (the Codeberg > one), but barring any emergency changes there, GCD 003 is now to be > considered final. > > As outlined in GCD 001, please respond to this mail with one of the > following: > > - $B!H(BI support$B!I(B, meaning that you support the proposal; > - $B!H(BI accept$B!I(B, meaning that you consent to the implementation of the > proposal; > - $B!H(BI disapprove$B!I(B, meaning that you oppose the implementation of the > proposal. I accept.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Apr 2025 09:12:16 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Apr 23 05:12:15 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53087 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1u7W9P-0000Dg-6v for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 05:12:15 -0400 Received: from dane.soverin.net ([2a10:de80:1:4091:b9e9:222f:0:1]:52415) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ekaitz@HIDDEN>) id 1u7W9L-0000CN-6v for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 05:12:13 -0400 Received: from smtp.soverin.net (unknown [10.10.4.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dane.soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ZjCzR4LPxzxd6; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 09:12:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.soverin.net (smtp.soverin.net [10.10.4.99]) by soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4ZjCzR0Clkz3n; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 09:12:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.soverin.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=elenq.tech header.i=@elenq.tech header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=soverin1 header.b=GqVm1lc5; dkim-atps=neutral DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=elenq.tech; s=soverin1; t=1745399523; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=FGCSavWquW8QPkkreQaotkxQiBcyKLsi9MAMpCLMq8M=; b=GqVm1lc58qY/hqXUVxHdwqFwilF1AZIDFY/SQH9Jc42nXiF1F0b1+SMDCl6t0XFDGumCoH /UQO6YfP2jJeXDV6RLMKldY64ZLNMbzO0IiIRor2h/Rk9/HUycMARL7a0U+tezIgQ9j10L 7wVUeUFCzqPBgI/qwuvIMoEhQnBNVdCIvbm4cAY41YNU3x4xSkeuZDQaH4newsISK3zouC rEcZTx+adSi7EuHUw3S9GuV0QVKNS44MowWpWwy6DhEEExGPd950k4bq3PiCRnb4rtobFn vqfB5WBOr4dT73/qcp29vIHW813YKZmAxOn2wb6O3uX1cy6XMQmPLABW2MZxWA== X-CM-Envelope: MS4xfHipcga6oGksE+Ep9VXpVhHMFxNxtYPYatfSRA1gdbEQ8Ixr5SY6YJGi3ffHBaMy9GKaj0o/HfE25V0jCnHF2gOfb7AsOLet2pVprBCDdQ6y3UzkQyvW F5lk7gXEGN7RwN0w/TVfS05mB3NLg2FgNFbHX0rPAOf756LHq4RmBLWeXylKJgoEyr5o19NarE9x3NPdWt/fs46NZnERZBV6quu+imcnYiZVMnKYIXXF7HUD fb7Kgnppxr8bXAkcnTKFYPsqXoylpWnZ/hjxr/3vczG6OhszUoOVGLvLEJeAq73+OBmQBqEwEy6pr4xbhtmnXg== X-CM-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=d/oPyQjE c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=6808aee3 a=GfXQuWAYjYMZp4ahSyumlQ==:117 a=GfXQuWAYjYMZp4ahSyumlQ==:17 a=3Q4YiEK3GMGmrnVZ:21 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=MKtGQD3n3ToA:10 a=1oJP67jkp3AA:10 a=ghNTcEWf2ykg7JOSvnQA:9 a=3ZKOabzyN94A:10 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=yPy0HX4kI4LsAlP3oO-2:22 Message-ID: <a69935e3-ef54-4104-83b7-22f39ada596e@HIDDEN> Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 11:12:02 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] A better name for the default branch To: =?UTF-8?Q?Andr=C3=A9_Batista?= <nandre@HIDDEN>, =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> References: <f072096c292546c760d1342aa7d4f6c950027da9.camel@HIDDEN> <87seocwh1p.fsf@HIDDEN> <87msej45ha.fsf@HIDDEN> <87wmdk8fpd.fsf@wireframe> <c2532d09-e54b-49fe-9ace-dca55239f394@HIDDEN> <d2db73de82bb7bb3a6589a4299287d02dc961c14.camel@HIDDEN> <547c549d-970e-4331-8944-dc7a79698426@HIDDEN> <87wmcm2sqc.fsf@HIDDEN> <49ba31a6-6f1d-4607-9169-95b7dc557cfb@HIDDEN> <8734f43tlq.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <aAhgdmfQieBkVgAq@andel> Content-Language: en-US, es-ES, eu From: Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN> Autocrypt: addr=ekaitz@HIDDEN; keydata= xsFNBGcvh/QBEACePF16wEeQaqfJNgeaSQB6ty6PzLaYtl8UVApPSCF1PYNEhDtxQOOpBXeu k6h68cjhRX7hmug8mAraXotw4aG4Z3kbUro4fzXOYW3rCi/mAm5NFXLUmBX3E1AV1pcD8hDA 5s3LeGzfTo4xRGTW4zTzxGEyrvbChkVib7wTSk52a/WkFas6l3sXnepF8HmIEOWkwQcYdcuo gaNDFP1kjZYvqfKJXmCZnY+lC8Zfe/vlD/x8FZQYBQ5xgXIfbSR0xlRz/XIHfJv6j+3myUUr 2UKMku1dkjlkhNkyfw+RypQzmbJ0oJ4bk76/ju0nnlN65/LvyeTVUh/2O2VnPnZ49keL8sqr APXF4di4pWT+/mPxfoEtiSDtjyzbr8+ajcwLa4SSKLlexqjZj8X6R4tt31Rf/Pliwe4TdPmd 2leE3BIJl9bAuslEvd5tqZ1oa3Zfb62tvpaJCRYMtOEWuGkYdyrwTW7UXJPQpam4X7WoW2jW c5aTpAnpnqIPzaWJmua1lGQjEXgt4xvVdhVmZq32fkTy/rXw9l5a+XU7N4/Zz8AR/0xO+UBc Q1J+wHADjL8Q0v0tZLEaiWL72AsxN3GMWNPXWAplaTPUNPUlNK0JPHwhTX/cQVkIc9avSKc3 BeUofC96d13I7QmRjQ0gcBaLtV9lMOuYwbC+6tb70x2fQsI3bwARAQABzSJFa2FpdHogWmFy cmFnYSA8ZWthaXR6QGVsZW5xLnRlY2g+wsGUBBMBCAA+FiEEXb4j05BTZSZ/jMdq/blSvT9z VtYFAmcvh/QCGwMFCQPCZwAFCwkIBwIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQ/blSvT9zVtbW CRAAkbla35s8RKhQBweqwEcdYDV2Zpt16OgENymjLs/qhh7Y9WgWZ0YraSNYDGCt6lemhior vrXX48+yZC98c8ZgCrr4Hmt8i/6TvJqVhwlZ9//3W/z/YuYDtUPBzRHgwM8tejiXmNqYM8lF Jg64pQaczmGAR29Xf0WTQegSociBSUg9eC7BS74Uh7UbHCgytyretoKmqJAp8SKE/Czt5x4R lXKVgGawzg1GerriwnNbudy0eyl1q0Pn7Q+K+tQ14EPDAM+QsGR/fBV4a3uYP6sBF+SdM+DO LX5MRVbWJ8O3kLmbAKQeLgSLlnYydMY/mTvjgxMAakfGCA4q69gmyDSB0fzAUm3c1JV5VwIo 63rykiOEB/k2m4aiiujH5kOC86sjb273+XXWlOhOEO/vKHHdAh+B7dnEEYUPXnUEMQ23PaF4 22u7C62kw3yH/krKr60t5FxcqNWtCOxEWc0WMZw12Q3Gw8+9oA5DI/f4gjlGvQiQWqj6dvoX vIDmifr0R3sTi6xh+udu2Rp8PsKOW8ZRyQ0/VOiwzBfQkf4PFowaiRp8LnkjLEVft6ruuA1h awO2SKKJ8WpgZPw5oMigZR5DgbunxMD4BcqmD7bSoTRV/ljx1I8UgAaQLPqVVnLt31iENtLv 43kPHl56AbYpAzcvf8nGU3KPhGOoByyuyph4RYDOwU0EZy+H9AEQANc9vw7DnBeNGKhq1Bg5 oiGII7npGXCChe7PB6CJjkvN6n1kXrvBYsaORXvZJPNgmBTKu/ETGYS0t0YeGlI4WTOK9dgB /7T8dngRmrGjPmZjryzfk18tXnJq0zoLixLizDT3FqV4jOG5KjPTxQvpdBMiX9oX4Je2OMqF d14fopLGav0rW7Fh5p83OSREpXbJUJJiUaH3p9U9Ss8IBHzr669PViAqe09EfxL/L0l1JIFj HQjJcg01PUXZAW6aPtd7q6eNCSLTXYPiDRQe2GdRUcB7WfqCogR/LEpzLLcd0NkxCnc0T6da rq2Dupt8rvQ95L4/cOGVcDUDOGE6U92XCkaCvUQkypxQCGKSEjbTFoLRG/4JQj0pAWSaqxPS 7hkTFql4qUAdRwzHN1ib6XedcFfqHSy2Mk5ttW8DaBGKhCm7Mn6+4smXENHSuQxCqHlCQ2m+ 9ogpbxavNVfAblE/ucxyfyo6FlDbGHEG3Yu5296kUPT7PqZLiR3KetMPJfCLY2jVPio3t4tD s7Sj41sG5aIwEApb0Zoz3bPBt5O5GUoPFnXyjO306WLxXrM2tjY38jwHxF1Qvs3HQTJgRei2 g3D3KiiR27cXXs/8lrr8tblr5J1tE4TaQCea5lDuEgTCDLnlcopoYcKpFAUBGQtzcNkudT9w sM2nf9y6INcUE3FlABEBAAHCwXwEGAEIACYWIQRdviPTkFNlJn+Mx2r9uVK9P3NW1gUCZy+H 9AIbDAUJA8JnAAAKCRD9uVK9P3NW1td1D/4xx8AbDKAKx9ezT6GdTZbK6FS66qRQCEzTa5MX ZCEogASOla71CB10l5fFtsRWCtNQLzmgwkFwhdxyjqendDgacc5v/71NBb5KpKni6wDJMeiG s3Lq3ZgWfHte3NZ99iSH+La3aBSFbCloJ/Yf/MJBkzrm1sTTKcgF9/i0pzkume5vtpKRDjjS z4abHu7qk4Sgi5gwWpoKFTT38q6nLP+9SUla3JJjNqU3gvn8kwv6KDMKc4marnSp/c+5O6E+ lNrxMdD0n8+io/Bf/UEI6BU8F7JshPq732bHN1NzUXvgMd4cNsAlvsWM8UCKZ4/usFl1euMM FOvnadZinsTHpXhahJzkYWA7nAKbCoNNq9LPtWxfjHsIfhs+QQafF31Pw+jqHqruB4tH0eiL abrz7kejaZvJdVipNIzRUWYnpP+18khep2UtT1n9VNs6QNb4cHPsoe+s4ga4ZK/klCdEhLya XtbcaNEHb7NZUOBj3HhKFgIY8PD1AptAObHjsUNF5+jfEnl+5WjwyTZTIgDRiOrwn8LWOANQ 0JpR69t06uJwmiogQgnlYe36YFaauHGQZFa+L+R2zgnGn8TnR4C3tH7gNAef9+PKqgmJT5pN IkFzlDmZi05E9xzhj4WQ/OOsqU64eHL2PaDk+2TdfrzNwNFbkABJ+C7BHNAytQ6h9cpUbg== In-Reply-To: <aAhgdmfQieBkVgAq@andel> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spampanel-Class: ham X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: liliana.prikler@HIDDEN, 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On 2025-04-23 05:37, André Batista wrote: > I do not personally believe for one second that > Ekaitz has either argued in good faith Dude, relax.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Apr 2025 03:40:36 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 22 23:40:36 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51429 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1u7QyS-000862-8I for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 23:40:36 -0400 Received: from mx0.riseup.net ([198.252.153.6]:41824) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <nandre@HIDDEN>) id 1u7QyO-00085j-67 for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 23:40:33 -0400 Received: from fews02-sea.riseup.net (fews02-sea-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.112]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx0.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Zj4cp1Qjwz9v2B; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 03:40:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1745379626; bh=1N6oqWRV6zVLjC1IMFFH/wvwDbCmCXzbLc8eIwwodXE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ixLcvaMAwf5N9Kof54vgRIXYmJ04FfEN+xKzfQbSaXtJK9snd8pYHl3QodgmK80VR 19EYKRu+wFojADW33kx4KictzUFIArpt1G+EcWBYlYKnIffGxQlieVhDAg+27FrHT2 ONteOLncwgQG21F2UOSgXbUd4PANu2EkRI8/jp18= X-Riseup-User-ID: 10EF70F6B0EEA373980B4034835429ABA9CE3616D0CA58E3E7670E73E62F5E12 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews02-sea.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Zj4cm216bzFptF; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 03:40:24 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 00:40:19 -0300 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Batista <nandre@HIDDEN> To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#76407] Deliberation period for GCD 003 "Rename the default branch" has technically started Message-ID: <aAhhI1cY5ItiHopB@andel> References: <b900cd17b88123af3ae95f4e7d572e540f86e879.camel@HIDDEN> <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: guix-devel@HIDDEN, 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hi Liliana, seg 21 abr 2025 s 16:07:14 (1745262434), liliana.prikler@HIDDEN enviou: > Hi Guix, > > as the date for the GCD 003 was set to February 18th, the discussion > period actually ended on Saturday already. I have incorporated some > changes on Sunday to realign the proposal with GCD 002 (the Codeberg > one), but barring any emergency changes there, GCD 003 is now to be > considered final. > I support. Thanks!
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Apr 2025 03:38:05 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 22 23:38:05 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51412 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1u7Qw0-0007uw-ME for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 23:38:05 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:36786) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <nandre@HIDDEN>) id 1u7Qvt-0007u4-AY for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 23:37:59 -0400 Received: from fews02-sea.riseup.net (fews02-sea-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.112]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Zj4Yq1z9vzDqBD; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 03:37:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1745379471; bh=BLhdrLdqehRhHiMrmCWEtVjzgCU8py8uhnV94ot+YfM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=BGozmElPCQ2XBi9umCl4Wdmh2nIVfZs1+uMR5BZD6U3HuzEWsS/p0Wu/f9mxo2bPx e0KMJulpCAIACv6g8wF6LUGQKSt6VAlJY5fKH56FvzKibmgYr4s61PmDVTH+3FsF0n PrzIrVqTr5q4Ole7opPb5PHn2QhcOBUVnzhpeM0A= X-Riseup-User-ID: AF27CB1F8D1175EB11D0FABD62235DE3CE8045AD6E2EA78F4D363389E3478D18 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews02-sea.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Zj4Ym6mHkzFtCj; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 03:37:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 00:37:26 -0300 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Batista <nandre@HIDDEN> To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] A better name for the default branch Message-ID: <aAhgdmfQieBkVgAq@andel> References: <f072096c292546c760d1342aa7d4f6c950027da9.camel@HIDDEN> <87seocwh1p.fsf@HIDDEN> <87msej45ha.fsf@HIDDEN> <87wmdk8fpd.fsf@wireframe> <c2532d09-e54b-49fe-9ace-dca55239f394@HIDDEN> <d2db73de82bb7bb3a6589a4299287d02dc961c14.camel@HIDDEN> <547c549d-970e-4331-8944-dc7a79698426@HIDDEN> <87wmcm2sqc.fsf@HIDDEN> <49ba31a6-6f1d-4607-9169-95b7dc557cfb@HIDDEN> <8734f43tlq.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <8734f43tlq.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: liliana.prikler@HIDDEN, 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN>, Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hi, dom 23 mar 2025 às 11:54:25 (1742741665), ludo@HIDDEN enviou: > Egun on Ekaitz, > > Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN> skribis: > > > Also, what drains me from this is not only the fact that this is an > > unreasonable change in many levels, but the fact that those who push > > for it don't care about being reasonable but do care about winning and > > labeling others as "far right". […] > > I haven’t read in detail the previous discussion on guix-devel that you > must be referring to, but derogatory comments like those you report > could be a violation of the code of conduct. > I have spent quite some time reading the discussion and what I saw was the exact opposite of what Ekaitz is claiming. For the record: I do not personally believe for one second that Ekaitz has either argued in good faith on this thread or that their interjections were aimed at consensus building at all. I also do believe that their wording were inviting others to harass Liliana and anyone who openly supports oppressed minorities. And I see that as being very problematic since it's comming from someone with commit rights on our project. I'll elaborate on this further down. Normally, I would have just skipped this whole thread after the first few troublesome remarks I've read, as I do know that nothing good comes out of this sort of interactions and I'm beyond hoping some people to face that they are very much part of the problem and to change their harmful ways toward others. However, this community is very dear to me and, being so, I don't want to let this kind of behaviour be normalized around here. I also know I've been wrong many times in my life and hopefully this is one of those times. That being said, I'll reframe the issue at hand in the hopes of untangling it from some dead end discussions, most importantly those related to subjective perceptions, cultural-societal customs and mores and personal intentions. First of all: the strugle against oppression and for human rights is _NOT_ one that can be put to majority voting, opinion polling or other numerical methods of decision making. That would be tantamount to requiring oppressed minorities to be majorities to have their issues, interests taken seriously. The paradox is clear cut. However, Ekaitz has leaned on this numbers game more than once as if saying that "a minority is a minority" were some kind of "argument" or ARGUMENT as they put it. Make Minorities Great Again. If that was the whole of it, one could ascribe it to a lack of a proper logical education or reasoning on their part. But they didn't stop there. Over and over they put into question the actual _existence_ of such minority, proceeded to claim that these people are "imaginary", claimed that their lack of interactions with this minority is some kind of proof of their non-existence and _demanded_ to be _convinced_ of the contrary. There are many issues on that reasoning, but for us here three stand out: 1. They are implying that those who proposed/supported this GCD are either brainwashed puppets, liers, ill-intentioned or non-people; 2. They are demanding that people who are oppressed/victimized "show their faces" on this public fora, conveniently ignoring that those people could and probably would be targeted after showing their faces, which is a form of violence in itself; 3. They are posing as if they have to be convinced for things to proceed, not as if the burden was on them to show that their disagreement is based on reasons that are shared by the community. More than that, they then proceeded to claim that this non-existent imaginary folks where some kind of super majority which would win by a land slide on this GCD and to pose as some sort of vilanized defender of _real_ oppressed people which would be very much harmed by such a change, even though they don't say _HOW_ such people are being harmed by the current GCD. This is all well-known playbook tactics of fascists/nazis which no one claimed them to be, but which they themselves rushed to say they are being labeled. Another old trick on the aforementioned playbook. Say it first so as to discredit any one who says it later. Play the victim of a Schrödinger enemy, one that is at the same time super strong and patetically weak. To add insult to injury, they then proceeded to claim that they couldn't care less for the name of the default branch. So, even though they don't actually care, they somehow find the strenght, time and resources to be _very_ involved in denying that the proposal could have any meaning or benefit at all and that it is outright harmful to the project, opening the gates to some flood of similar proposals. Similar on what? On being against oppression? Polical movements, ethical considerations and a clear stance against oppression all require that we take sides and that we make some people unconfortable. The question is _NOT_ which is the optimal decision that will make the greater number of people happy. That is easy: go by the status quo, it is the status quo because the majority is conformant to it. The question is: which decision brings us closer to a society without or with the bare minimum possible oppression? Also, oppression does not cease to be oppression because those who are oppressed do not or cannot recognize it as oppression. It does not matter that you happen to know someone who is a black, blind, handicaped, fat, old, trans, muslim, schizo, cognitively impaired illegal immigrant who happens to not care about this issue. Their opinion is not the "truth" on the matter at hand. It's just their opinion. And they are only a flawed human who are trying to cope with their lot on life. The fact that they have a huge following, became internet influencers and got thousands of likes on their message saying that they don't care is not proof that this is not an issue, it is rather proof that there is social aceptance for things to stay as they are. But then again, oppression has always had social acceptance, it cannot exist without it, there is no need to prove it. Finally, I despise imperialism, I despise corporations, I despise PR stunts and I despise propaganda, but corporations and empires trying to pander to progressive causes is _NOT_ the reason I despise them. The reason I despise them is because they do cause and maintain a state of normalized oppression. But unlike me, there are those who don't have any issues with oppression as long as they themselves can assume the role of oppressors. These are the people who have issues every time someone tries to critically question the status quo and to propose tiny changes to the way we talk, behave, think. Of course branch names on guix won't end oppression, no one is expecting that. Of course "master" has other meanings which are unrelated to slavery, no one is saying it does not. However, the harmful meaning was brought up and some people showed issued with it. Is there a strong reason to keep this handle for our repos in sight of that? Some prople brought valid concerns: guix time machine for instance. Pandering to those who might feel alienated by moving away from this name is not a valid concern IMO. Why is this word so special to them? Or, if it is not special to them, why all this noise? PS: many times people's rights were invoked to defend this position. Let me then remember that capitalists have a right to hoard wealth, slavers had a right to trade on human lives and copyright holders have a right to keep their code proprietary. That does not mean we should support their "rights". At least for the last one, I think it is safe to say that our project very much does not support that right. PPS: Since nation-states were brought up as a subject, here is my 2c on that front: Spain is well-known for having excelled at two things: inquisition and genocide.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Apr 2025 08:11:04 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 22 04:11:04 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44899 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1u78ie-0001g9-EB for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 04:11:04 -0400 Received: from mailtransmit04.runbox.com ([2a0c:5a00:149::25]:43512) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <steve@HIDDEN>) id 1u78ib-0001fY-3t for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 04:11:02 -0400 Received: from mailtransmit02.runbox ([10.9.9.162] helo=aibo.runbox.com) by mailtransmit04.runbox.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <steve@HIDDEN>) id 1u78iS-001ZRm-Iz; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 10:10:52 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=futurile.net; s=selector1; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=VApOB3rMd0JsDs2MZxUN6wXo7aiEMarmb0lf15/aHNM=; b=rb26F0XMOm19REWus0TzcE66pY 9jAEyNJz0Wf5C4vomzsbsH0E1htFAG+F2iKeJ9BKHtLbIepe4IcHdBPz+sEWfpXUcXug9fjloXkue 0aL80ZHZ+n5Ra/+Wu6jC4+G6i0F7uotLpm8qVVZEHyjPFOuz5iXbRB7aKcqrgFfSTMVH5G6TibDWy oWmnNXEGlzEUoIbOyAhNWTWUtkRIps9CliTE216bfKD1y8eT7GMMm/R5RZQcFB29yrX9zqnnXpaaU QBiQtgEF+GiqGdnCWaMoCasGIZu3jPAPqNzmFtsLhIMAG316x8k+1tRND+UwNN/fnxSaGA42hxbI4 ZFQkuVWQ==; Received: from [10.9.9.73] (helo=submission02.runbox) by mailtransmit02.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from <steve@HIDDEN>) id 1u78iR-0003Fh-Vg; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 10:10:52 +0200 Received: by submission02.runbox with esmtpsa [Authenticated ID (641962)] (TLS1.2:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.93) id 1u78iP-007jyN-8F; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 10:10:49 +0200 Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 09:10:48 +0100 From: Steve George <steve@HIDDEN> To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: Deliberation period for GCD 003 "Rename the default branch" has technically started Message-ID: <gy4btw2qz6gd3ribhauraokpjhek66mmu6fqzmfp2wnqdkn7q6@hoxtvrtlpsxy> References: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: guix-devel@HIDDEN, info-guix@HIDDEN, 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On 21 Apr, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: > Hi Guix, > > as the date for the GCD 003 was set to February 18th, the discussion > period actually ended on Saturday already. I have incorporated some > changes on Sunday to realign the proposal with GCD 002 (the Codeberg > one), but barring any emergency changes there, GCD 003 is now to be > considered final. > > As outlined in GCD 001, please respond to this mail with one of the > following: > > - “I support”, meaning that you support the proposal; > - “I accept”, meaning that you consent to the implementation of the > proposal; > - “I disapprove”, meaning that you oppose the implementation of the > proposal. > > To count my own vote, I support the change of the default branch name > to “main”. > > Cheers > I disapprove. I don't think the deliberations on this have gone well either from a group dynamics or technical perspective. It may be that it's simply too social-political to go well, or that as a group we're too new at this type of formal consensus building to do it well. It's an extremely difficult area. At this point I think it needs some calm and further discussion. Steve / Futurile
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Apr 2025 07:36:33 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 22 03:36:33 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44624 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1u78BF-0007Nc-7Y for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 03:36:33 -0400 Received: from world.peace.net ([50.187.222.44]:48904) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>) id 1u78BB-0007Mf-Pr for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 03:36:30 -0400 Received: from mhw by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>) id 1u78B4-0001R0-8Z; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 03:36:22 -0400 From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN> To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: Deliberation period for GCD 003 "Rename the default branch" has technically started In-Reply-To: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> References: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 03:39:21 -0400 Message-ID: <87h62gbq63.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: guix-devel@HIDDEN, 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) I accept.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Apr 2025 03:58:38 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 21 23:58:37 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42641 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1u74mL-0003lT-I7 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 23:58:37 -0400 Received: from fout-a7-smtp.messagingengine.com ([103.168.172.150]:52005) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ian@HIDDEN>) id 1u74mH-0003kq-Re for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 23:58:34 -0400 Received: from phl-compute-09.internal (phl-compute-09.phl.internal [10.202.2.49]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A0BF138021A; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 23:58:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-02 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-09.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 21 Apr 2025 23:58:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=retrospec.tv; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1745294308; x=1745380708; bh=uQM9Sc9eAkzl0Ds5JrDeNc55FSARS8Xqc3zZ/JYS2BE=; b= ojs/7FK3kBb9Y3OZLYspXElUZjRQf7LjedUJy+Nul56KVV/L/5y6Vb3grewA8aWl BuH3WCUsGxdjhY4lV1nE94kr++bx4AdsTTedXxTXbqwQMLskSjGYgn7LcgNn54HH brY6tAhZCXPVG0pi4Gh0Y3RfomPXupEWAdl/ylrhwMUyNhTtgKe2aFdrc6t6c54e MNJTJAAWyby6etQVtYGFKEamrxsAV4lelsTiUQn9qSs/MWKpWWWp7HzgV6FQIxA5 zC5tls8SJGvqZqh5lwXOECQvxzD3UHGXdSJWvbAf34tc4PEt5vBuUQtJqYLxPl2A bXFApltQy4v0lQZOHgfYaA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1745294308; x= 1745380708; bh=uQM9Sc9eAkzl0Ds5JrDeNc55FSARS8Xqc3zZ/JYS2BE=; b=l zwfhNUSBdosBhB5fum29ygYeeFuJlK33hhi6WJgFq5EagHGiKeRVO6bbqTFuTzIR H4mXsc0rTh5t0gF/zrIw0hXi6SnCeBYs0NriJKN/WdA1bHCCkDJCq6gGPiZlFnnp JnWrgWqtc8dHKjm0rC0+aJyY/VtREowpzQOY3oFbu2jsaE5OplrjbopsaJOHnqA9 5pLqZ92jJ+5zvxvB4n1MsRTXQlgKFaztSlrZGYluXcZKrmOvNcYmiu0Vy6J6Ulnl b3uzAhhkQaq+3uDIR4dM+fX4e3tWE7jWESETBHV26bdtbtQ+PO3KIoHA32fPljQ7 5e/gKpk1y4bQXSeZcJa7A== X-ME-Sender: <xms:4xMHaP2fQETE38_vTTXQeJTGmo4E3rZxfCV8HQjcyUePUoXE-30k9w> <xme:4xMHaOGIc0qPE_18Z1YU2fkQaT6dPVkFWD8uY6kuYgmlKu0miTBrgkQGxKU9kZqCH 9skkcWEKxhrYrMlBw> X-ME-Received: <xmr:4xMHaP7F98QRMkmlvsq81LkIS8DM2eQF-ytyps8e7yFn7TKX8yjpkxPl2EVt5RTot_cmzpOBtCCRljzJbngZuATDuNaXR_OLpkLf> X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefvddrtddtgddvgedvjeduucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggv pdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpih gvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhephffvvefujghffgffkfggtgfgsehtqhertddt reejnecuhfhrohhmpefkrghnucfguhhrvgcuoehirghnsehrvghtrhhoshhpvggtrdhtvh eqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepveeuleeugedujeeukefhhffhlefgjeehfeffhefgffel keevkeeutdegkeelgeffnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrg hilhhfrhhomhepihgrnhesrhgvthhrohhsphgvtgdrthhvpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopeeg pdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopeejieegtdejseguvggssghughhsrd hgnhhurdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepihhnfhhoqdhguhhigiesghhnuhdrohhrghdprhgt phhtthhopehguhhigidquggvvhgvlhesghhnuhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehlihhlih grnhgrrdhprhhikhhlvghrsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:4xMHaE3tbIjpJCS9aPpwM9T8ZfeML3Ghv8WrgS2vfUvJQADIswlxCQ> <xmx:4xMHaCH807h0Z_1aWcWplDfA98qmXd4YSx4NQquruAwoR81UJzNKSg> <xmx:4xMHaF-cGrQdssusgpICk7wI5itdaBir4F9jgfelFAtMBxRDARpvaw> <xmx:4xMHaPl_A5T5RcRFeXIIeaXQH-FBP4VDvsnd6fm0V1_DwWO-tnwbBw> <xmx:5BMHaI92kOvgb1c9SRK9e7B5x8WKv97iZQzHRJgW0emLd0GtyWra8LU7> Feedback-ID: id9014242:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 23:58:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Ian Eure <ian@HIDDEN> To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: Deliberation period for GCD 003 "Rename the default branch" has technically started In-Reply-To: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> (Liliana Marie Prikler's message of "Mon, 21 Apr 2025 16:07:14 +0200") References: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.9; emacs 29.4 Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 20:58:25 -0700 Message-ID: <87bjsoj19a.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: guix-devel@HIDDEN, info-guix@HIDDEN, 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hi Liliana, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> writes: > Hi Guix, > > as the date for the GCD 003 was set to February 18th, the=20 > discussion > period actually ended on Saturday already. I have incorporated=20 > some > changes on Sunday to realign the proposal with GCD 002 (the=20 > Codeberg > one), but barring any emergency changes there, GCD 003 is now to=20 > be > considered final. > > As outlined in GCD 001, please respond to this mail with one of=20 > the > following: > > - =E2=80=9CI support=E2=80=9D, meaning that you support the proposal; > - =E2=80=9CI accept=E2=80=9D, meaning that you consent to the implementat= ion of=20 > the > proposal; > - =E2=80=9CI disapprove=E2=80=9D, meaning that you oppose the implementat= ion of=20 > the > proposal. > > To count my own vote, I support the change of the default branch=20 > name > to =E2=80=9Cmain=E2=80=9D. > I support. Thanks, -- Ian
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Apr 2025 23:59:25 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 21 19:59:25 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41099 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1u712r-0001xs-6N for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 19:59:25 -0400 Received: from relay.yourmailgateway.de ([188.68.63.170]:58727) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <pelzflorian@HIDDEN>) id 1u712o-0001xh-2h for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 19:59:23 -0400 Received: from mors-relay8203.netcup.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mors-relay8203.netcup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ZhMm76xQmz8dXF; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 23:59:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=pelzflorian.de; s=key2; t=1745279960; bh=4MmBK9gyWJ2Io7trxxzTuDdeXPbKZD6ZYHkXcjM01+M=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=hnfVhsYymPoGzU0l4xjG/0PJ8HFp9KqRKQZmkxHtPKTLyHQKX+9bcgX25rl8hkXrg vr0yGTJKa7rff/Zx/JiJLO9kBpioaqccxmCaCvPEFUsJMODWF3VTD8A93kH7yvMS1t zQCRdkm1nHtQx36cQZzaepPocJxV0+Smqx+hDGdASA7irHlULQ2nw9mqqYgRoyHORP LX/n+8xnV1yO1eNhcZXmEDrOjY/ORHuUzI4UwWqcFBtaqt4peeiDZKF3PiPVSoo2+Z T1YliGmLkk8tGhMvpGEg2tRvKuzZ8B+ji3GOm28D0rHPQE3cHjos6vySWN2k9d8UOy O0n+Vk649nnkA== Received: from policy02-mors.netcup.net (unknown [46.38.225.35]) by mors-relay8203.netcup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ZhMm76DXkz8dXD; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 23:59:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mxe217.netcup.net (unknown [10.243.12.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by policy02-mors.netcup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ZhMm73h3Pz8sch; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 01:59:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from florianhp (ipb21a5dbf.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de [178.26.93.191]) by mxe217.netcup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ECD568530B; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 01:59:11 +0200 (CEST) From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian@HIDDEN> To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: Deliberation period for GCD 003 "Rename the default branch" has technically started In-Reply-To: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> (Liliana Marie Prikler's message of "Mon, 21 Apr 2025 16:07:14 +0200") References: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 01:59:11 +0200 Message-ID: <87jz7dukvk.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd-worker-8404 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: ECD568530B X-NC-CID: bSUbbhA75WVEw7mdz+61wVu9oL3TqQuy0oNIrVS8ps4BBQcGxyh69b7M X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: guix-devel@HIDDEN, 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) I support, because main is a better name and the cost will be handled well. Despite and not because renaming sends a political message, specifically Ekaitz wrote <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D76407#95>: 3. I don't think the change will make the project more inclusive, but may be counterproductive. (I disagree with Ekaitz=E2=80=99 other numbers.) The GCD embraces and emphasizes inclusiveness as motivation for naming, though it acknowledges the ongoing political debate in the drawbacks. The GCD=E2=80=99s wording is honest, but is not why I say I support. Regards, Florian
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Apr 2025 22:25:41 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 21 18:25:41 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40510 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1u6za8-0004B7-Qs
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 18:25:41 -0400
Received: from sail-ipv4.us-core.com ([208.82.101.137]:60322)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <felix.lechner@HIDDEN>)
id 1u6za4-0004Au-K6
for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 18:25:37 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=2017; bh=ddTVWPG6DYWgPEi
NYZLAwjCfHlMvEQR2ufI8LVP0qxg=;
h=date:references:in-reply-to:subject:
cc:to:from; d=lease-up.com; b=ZYx1EcsZD92n4tY+LFWFw0MTd7eL0M/xCbmIfDXs
paOJRO9XikkQj9DA2v7OBkicdIA3YhypZTrIwrX4ZNLgyZZkH5Z8u+TwPpAFEafaaZKFSo
aemp41r3SuuzLsdkp1D51SUDXr4sVgYG/vFGQwlJGbuE8RCFXJh399hdkecVk=
Received: by sail-ipv4.us-core.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 7cced4a8
(TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO);
Mon, 21 Apr 2025 22:25:33 +0000 (UTC)
From: Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@HIDDEN>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: Deliberation period for GCD 003 "Rename the default branch" has
technically started
In-Reply-To: <87r01l5l00.fsf@HIDDEN> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?=
=?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Mon, 21 Apr 2025 22:15:43 +0200")
References: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN>
<87ecxlqr31.fsf@wireframe> <87r01l5l00.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.9; emacs 29.4
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 15:25:26 -0700
Message-ID: <87ikmx2lux.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407
Cc: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@HIDDEN>, guix-devel@HIDDEN,
Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>, 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)
Hi Ludo'
On Mon, Apr 21 2025, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
> I=E2=80=99m curious how else this could be handled
Vagrant will surely repond better than I can, but just to get the ball
rolling: Debian has a mandated "further discussion" (FD) option, which
was somehow renamed to "none of the above" (NOTA). [1]
Kind regards
Felix
[1] https://www.debian.org/vote/2021/vote_003
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Apr 2025 21:51:25 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 21 17:51:25 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40010 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1u6z2y-0001ep-TD for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 17:51:25 -0400 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([212.71.252.8]:44196) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <mail@HIDDEN>) id 1u6z2r-0001eT-9A for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 17:51:21 -0400 Received: from localhost (21.48.90.146.dyn.plus.net [146.90.48.21]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CC70127BC49; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 22:51:14 +0100 (BST) Received: from fang (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 6387d832; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 21:51:14 +0000 (UTC) From: Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN> To: guix-devel@HIDDEN, 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: Deliberation period for GCD 003 "Rename the default branch" has technically started In-Reply-To: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> (Liliana Marie Prikler's message of "Mon, 21 Apr 2025 16:07:14 +0200") References: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.9; emacs 29.4 Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 22:51:11 +0100 Message-ID: <874iyhgp4g.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> writes: > as the date for the GCD 003 was set to February 18th, the discussion > period actually ended on Saturday already. I have incorporated some > changes on Sunday to realign the proposal with GCD 002 (the Codeberg > one), but barring any emergency changes there, GCD 003 is now to be > considered final. > > As outlined in GCD 001, please respond to this mail with one of the > following: > > - =E2=80=9CI support=E2=80=9D, meaning that you support the proposal; > - =E2=80=9CI accept=E2=80=9D, meaning that you consent to the implementat= ion of the > proposal; > - =E2=80=9CI disapprove=E2=80=9D, meaning that you oppose the implementat= ion of the > proposal. I disapprove. I do actually still support the idea of moving away from master as a branch name, but I think the implementation of GCD 003 as it currently stands is lacking. I've been using trunk as the master branch for the last couple of months for some of the Guix Git repositories that I'm more involved in on Savannah. There's still a need to delete the branch master, but I'm unclear whether if this GCD goes through, it would be necessary to change from trunk to main. Personally I dislike main as a branch name and prefer trunk. Going back to my concerns earlier in the discussion, there's nothing in GCD 003 about keeping the data service or bordeaux build farm working with a change to the master branch name. Maybe it's not necessary to include anything in the GCD about branch name replacements in configuration, but both the build farm and data service have data connected to the Git branch, and it's less clear what to do with this data and how to handle historic references to the master branch. Maybe these are just minor issues and not worth disapproving the GCD over, but it feels like it's these kind of issues that the process in general should address, even if that is to just note that it was raised, discussed and the conclusion was to not include it in the scope. I do still hope that an agreement to change the master branch name can be reached, but I think it's important to handle it well, both in terms of this GCD process which is in it's infancy still, and also the actual technical/user impactful changes. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKlBAEBCgCPFiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAmgGvc9fFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcRHG1haWxAY2Jh aW5lcy5uZXQACgkQXiijOwuE9XfrLxAArtfpC6kWQ+XwrBVmOoUwMiXt6V8Ar4Lc dIj7/U7C5LSGhnL87uTRPvCz9jGw8U+a1WBQHPA/ACkmHEBGlDkrd1UMTywqNB9R tSxqnLOBzAwWf+nim/cdu+mLzJAAvt92DHEDh0ZSTkp+GRs3IIOYGdgwDe09a5nH bd7VKynYBzI0SW9Pdr+j66WhNzyniP7Ymg/i0zPFWrQcg6Tc8LxwruxqcZxgQ2GJ jGOP0YnTod8x+teXDPPfAlqqZhsVPUl9x5BuYDre5QQdsMRkeclGtsmNJjXqNTmv rnDTvF0oGrES0CYZoPBBb/ZQlJha3J8t/FDDItAvBxpfiYizBOsJtk9PUlVpRZtm OlDO4SrusNY+mXu0oGt72irJ8YZyOpVS6iR0jc9HTR9AbZ97IjlSVQcpcNY4nmGo K5VXLvJSJgvoKM9FkChNEGguUSVATcD0Dh+nyxTy5XjbqTmD05TyUD7pGZDleHel VimHEJs4tjaiSheUjiFTfbMWy55T5c6Ov0ONorr8QC0RuWribtPhQSrDn4BMfcsT n2A8dZtPqcXKSdPRuvU39kQaOXlrdFiN7iLHqCT78awt0pmDeZsp/Sw9C2cOBScO EjTRBteSrZEw9GBm3utP/QAuGFPu3O3ubKWyE0YmXt6q0rNs1DedlFg4ZnXdtV+X 11EMeYHtJ8w= =ZEnc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Apr 2025 21:28:11 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 21 17:28:11 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39805 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1u6ygV-0008Qt-53 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 17:28:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33458) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1u6ygS-0008Px-69 for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 17:28:09 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1u6ygL-0008Af-Vg; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 17:28:01 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=7ylzmpJf2II4/iYbO2cRb9HbNKnD/31e7rrvPt5aBnM=; b=O2waW6jllJ7wa8K+1qnI HkQGLrVGGeibexhPSHvyqTLIouVJ4+zJG73TWMFTHL75jJTHDRDGfEOHHRei8I3+893x2O4vNFgQT yn3jWqFQim49WA77eZiqVUMK1j+073DabNRqyY8Dbau00RHfrSQmioj91WHD7hptlAKNL5BrBxtkI 2MrVekOxpEsO9YetFD6Mka+I7RSO5s27ZHHr9htjTBwqFXCNUv7sl4nR+vsYFucmTfcbk3/CxN9E3 c6XOB/ARp1x9ptg3EECV4ktQTEKIBVIa5ZNeZisdBsCCQQjzhZb98F97Ie1g8bdMGrIvGOLPhk72v g3v9nvYBX5tdQw==; From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> To: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: Deliberation period for GCD 003 "Rename the default branch" has technically started In-Reply-To: <87ecxlqr31.fsf@wireframe> (Vagrant Cascadian's message of "Mon, 21 Apr 2025 11:58:42 -0700") References: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> <87ecxlqr31.fsf@wireframe> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.9; emacs 29.4 X-URL: https://people.bordeaux.inria.fr/lcourtes/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu X-Revolutionary-Date: Duodi 2 =?utf-8?Q?Flor=C3=A9al?= an 233 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution=2C?= jour du =?utf-8?Q?Ch=C3=AAne?= Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 22:15:43 +0200 Message-ID: <87r01l5l00.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: guix-devel@HIDDEN, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>, 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi, Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@HIDDEN> writes: > Only in retrospect of having encountered this situation did I realize > there is a fundamental flaw in the GCD process (at least in my > opinion)... in that there is a presumption of moving forward and > accepting the proposed changes (in some capacity), rather than > maintaining the status quo. E.g. a person has to propose improvements in > order to reject the proposal, but there is nowhere in the process that > handles a fundamental disagreement about the proposal in any form. This > is contrary to any other genuine consensus process I have worked with. The fundamental disagreement is expressed with =E2=80=9CI disapprove=E2=80= =9D, meant to be a last resort if all attempts to build consensus failed. I=E2=80=99m curious how else this could be handled, based on your experienc= e. Ludo=E2=80=99.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Apr 2025 19:26:21 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 21 15:26:21 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38932 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1u6wma-0008II-Tj
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 15:26:21 -0400
Received: from smtp1-g21.free.fr ([2a01:e0c:1:1599::10]:24376)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <noelopez@HIDDEN>) id 1u6wmW-0008I5-HA
for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 15:26:18 -0400
Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0a:990:a960:b4f3:8f44:ec4:5af5])
(Authenticated sender: noelopez@HIDDEN)
by smtp1-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9F496B00571;
Mon, 21 Apr 2025 21:26:11 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=free.fr;
s=smtp-20201208; t=1745263575;
bh=4jtjIkLwMxEy4g2aITkTp2w6CwEC7EAW9tjQ4gcsrxk=;
h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From;
b=UbDSe65T78tgvrYpMOqIeg0mmTZZPUAS4NDDSbD4lPRXjgBkYBp8u+zMsXqUL6MWK
Fkw0vIxaHVCsxsLUA0I7yCX7J6AJWAXfu66xQi2A4FNRV0OvKgr15RGb3JX2SogcqJ
NuJtmvgGUHh9bm74fThV2BqKabHY+k9n4eYELnwFqn2ZbBdhRH6judnXmAeGHljB5M
ZTkjMe/Xav/AAEtaGzo/gTGOwsHohol0EYpbfJ3jSxDB6CdzVmhV/YzPqUaI6HtWVA
OqH1JSfFx05Qag1G6yjgVC05Lx+4ejgL0VVwJMGnuCujQHUQSAM11el7QCFt2kDJaR
TvfkVpHSxBlcg==
From: =?utf-8?Q?No=C3=A9?= Lopez <noelopez@HIDDEN>
To: Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: [bug#76407] Deliberation period for GCD 003 "Rename the default
branch" has technically started
In-Reply-To: <CA+3U0Zks3r-K43GDcrCELE49VAjGhbVb2ugF3orH==OX8WTqLA@HIDDEN>
References: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN>
<87tt6hwiiy.fsf@HIDDEN> <871ptlxubi.fsf@HIDDEN>
<CA+3U0Zks3r-K43GDcrCELE49VAjGhbVb2ugF3orH==OX8WTqLA@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 21:26:06 +0200
Message-ID: <8734e1gvu9.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407
Cc: Christopher Howard <christopher@HIDDEN>,
Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>, 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 2:08=E2=80=AFPM No=C3=A9 Lopez <noelopez@HIDDEN>=
wrote:
>>
>> Christopher Howard <christopher@HIDDEN> writes:
>> It seems like you are not a member of any team. This means you are not
>> eligible to vote on the GCD.
>
> Where is this documented? Perhaps we should better distinguish votes
> by deliberating members. Apache "PMC members have formally binding
> votes, but in general communities encourage all their members to vote,
> even if their votes are only advisory"
> [https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html].
>
I am not a native english speaker, so a difference between eligibile and
deliberating member was not what I was trying to point out, it seems the
example you provide is similar to our GCD process.
The GCD process can be found at
<https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/guix-consensus-documents.git/tree/0=
01-gcd-process.md>.
Here is the related paragraph:
>The *deliberation period* starts when the authors publish a final version
>of the GCD at `info-guix@HIDDEN`. Anyone who is a team member is a
>deliberating member and is encouraged to contribute to the deliberation.
>> In any case, please explain your rationale for disapproval. To quote the
>> GCD process:
>>
>> >Thus, no decision is made against significant concerns; these concerns =
are
>> >actively resolved through counter proposals. A deliberating member
>> >disapproving a proposal bears a responsibility for finding alternatives,
>> >proposing ideas or code, or explaining the rationale for the status quo.
>
> This "finding alternatives, proposing ideas or code, or explaining the
> rationale for the status quo" is the discussion period. I do agree
> that summarizing one's viewpoints (and how these issues went
> unaddressed) when voting for "disapproval" is worthwhile ("withdrawal
> does not necessarily equate with rejection; it could mean that more
> discussion and thought is needed before ideas in the GCD are accepted
> by the community").
>
Agreed, though it is not specified that the quoted paragraph refers only
to the discussion period. It is part of a section on consensus based
decision making, which applies to the whole GCD process and Guix in
general.
Have a nice day,
No=C3=A9
--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=G9dS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Apr 2025 18:59:18 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 21 14:59:18 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38735 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1u6wMQ-0006GW-7a
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 14:59:18 -0400
Received: from mail-oa1-x2d.google.com ([2001:4860:4864:20::2d]:49661)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <code@HIDDEN>)
id 1u6wMH-0006Fz-DP
for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 14:59:10 -0400
Received: by mail-oa1-x2d.google.com with SMTP id
586e51a60fabf-2b8e26063e4so2301263fac.3
for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 11:59:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=greghogan-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1745261943; x=1745866743;
darn=debbugs.gnu.org;
h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from
:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date
:message-id:reply-to;
bh=rx8adElRJbHPLne8Qcy+Qc9+fzfZwtvIije0lpW9cWU=;
b=efT0vvUfMdI/Duq2szBAEXSI77dDxBsBaMe31yjCAYa7U+pI1/8b/d+WiFQ+mZ1jHP
a8M7wJBRxN7oqMBx8r/7NIOjG/vVKv/7l8IbsNNx0d7ISlKchYNj8lEdi+y4YIbhh+53
rVkUwl6xlwl643/zpuV8p9bi5OClLFVvVb60GW25VowOKlfi3Y6Jr7VJ9F4zXieL33WU
5ZyWl37SqYPYKCTO0bL9b7llxSuCA26Zc7ui6kpmH/l6JIuEsmn0CbNuLUMR/JomHXy5
ZhpvFG/h0VyuX3l4h0gDCaKZq2YsNJX0c0rgTbSKJDw8nmZ/lLQbI2CLgWw8Oe9VFhMX
2JBQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1745261943; x=1745866743;
h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from
:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=rx8adElRJbHPLne8Qcy+Qc9+fzfZwtvIije0lpW9cWU=;
b=f8kPe9av0UJ66iYDXZL8JJB+koBuYN2XUazXadbhENyRXcPBxLCxCXCM6APx1/OSp+
mMex3SgGUYcs1GbN5ACBUSHOQXJTAp1/gZdeqSc+XICkZMVshRSLt4a8XoUGpICFOCbZ
QkAudsgEZA6ErZrx5Cbkm5XIprOMSTQo+JycYu+PuU7VuFDW1EDx+BT0lHmGadpm6uNc
SlrfWldL9U13PwPnAV0V45u4H5vxqy0c3qYIKeLtxcB+NynLs4vW+4Kl1XlmDFDSPOa1
wI2b+Qmw2WeJxDE7Nx8ciG+TbRvT9UrNsVzB2s/JfwDnX/+w3sUpE+4p0SCgl/Plx1RT
/WJg==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1;
AJvYcCVmnNikdGys2QHzkSv60evJGmhWnQVkp76OBs6h2zAQ58NpRJtKtUbgDrQthnsMtvE5yAmVcQ==@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwzQVGAIFhwtLzHaliQxmABtT6o4QnKHv4SwaA41oUOMzMZ1/i1
TW9OKDx7gesc8O1sZsr003AcIMbC0S4/COa+4r6hX9s8eL/xnjvKwXK65QyBNNvxpLNvIBGT0uY
W2HATo/bnaJkarYrxA5EUjGhHJudnBxHlj6ZZow==
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctjjBlTGbV+d6u+bZr7gNrckAa8cPGAJ5ReagBnh2j6KVqVY/0ebCFQLw71lPT
EYlI7Bzo04Lfp7GAONOkcxIlH6KOONLSnXWY/FP3fn4XCJ2wr7Y2Bv6pOibqFoXUaYX/ryRaF86
RoB+NnCmdlJ+tUD17GnPm+TA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGIqDA//U0aFpYyDFUFqOV7VHuavSh79kYeB8nkP96t0x6rkyFMUC9GIkFxFQ+FamRXGmUCIP1sYxzLul9qSYU=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6871:a584:b0:297:24ad:402f with SMTP id
586e51a60fabf-2d526bd3221mr6973864fac.12.1745261943264; Mon, 21 Apr 2025
11:59:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN>
<87tt6hwiiy.fsf@HIDDEN> <871ptlxubi.fsf@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <871ptlxubi.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 14:58:52 -0400
X-Gm-Features: ATxdqUE3rNnSIlT_zvFZs9GEq2xHaL6Hlv3R60MNwRRKqZAk0Ru8Zz2n87EmJtw
Message-ID: <CA+3U0Zks3r-K43GDcrCELE49VAjGhbVb2ugF3orH==OX8WTqLA@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: [bug#76407] Deliberation period for GCD 003 "Rename the default
branch" has technically started
To: =?UTF-8?Q?No=C3=A9_Lopez?= <noelopez@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407
Cc: Christopher Howard <christopher@HIDDEN>,
Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>, 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 2:08=E2=80=AFPM No=C3=A9 Lopez <noelopez@HIDDEN> w=
rote:
>
> Christopher Howard <christopher@HIDDEN> writes:
> It seems like you are not a member of any team. This means you are not
> eligible to vote on the GCD.
Where is this documented? Perhaps we should better distinguish votes
by deliberating members. Apache "PMC members have formally binding
votes, but in general communities encourage all their members to vote,
even if their votes are only advisory"
[https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html].
> In any case, please explain your rationale for disapproval. To quote the
> GCD process:
>
> >Thus, no decision is made against significant concerns; these concerns a=
re
> >actively resolved through counter proposals. A deliberating member
> >disapproving a proposal bears a responsibility for finding alternatives,
> >proposing ideas or code, or explaining the rationale for the status quo.
This "finding alternatives, proposing ideas or code, or explaining the
rationale for the status quo" is the discussion period. I do agree
that summarizing one's viewpoints (and how these issues went
unaddressed) when voting for "disapproval" is worthwhile ("withdrawal
does not necessarily equate with rejection; it could mean that more
discussion and thought is needed before ideas in the GCD are accepted
by the community").
> Have a nice day,
> No=C3=A9
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Apr 2025 18:59:18 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 21 14:59:18 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38733 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1u6wMP-0006GM-MA for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 14:59:17 -0400 Received: from cascadia.aikidev.net ([173.255.214.101]:54234) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <vagrant@HIDDEN>) id 1u6wM3-0006FC-K6 for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 14:58:56 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=debian.org; s=1.vagrant.user; t=1745261928; bh=+XlA1BYFhtp/MUfSdwkwtUKEjpr63QiUQeV3N6d/oYg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=Qb2LiNa7T9YFQwOqos8d5r2EAp2GqL3mBeW8KmbLWXPJd+raQuWY3CJ3POZr8/Qjw ZAWtfjCVHRquZhv9lL3a+5S4pScFJ09pF9TpDawLmR+ODcgBqS18Q1EXYoZLIMhCHn UMqycLR6Lq8GJspkOXv6YWtouYHKLDt34ejaNl094UO80afQIfef7+5lGzCaa1B45h toXZnS4oQVO+nY6fBk2UHet26+BSNQ7aQBprPRhSM7CtLDGeAQMMtc8O/FkYchPuUs AosVF7KpI1DfOF5YbCBfLQJ6b1+nzxIcf0S6WHHz9X+n7WKSvnNJDd5gPg8a7SWFG2 L9pO/q9e3CUmw== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2600:3c01:e000:21:7:77:0:50]) by cascadia.aikidev.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C7AD687F; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 11:58:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@HIDDEN> To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>, guix-devel@HIDDEN, info-guix@HIDDEN Subject: Re: Deliberation period for GCD 003 "Rename the default branch" has technically started In-Reply-To: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> References: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 11:58:42 -0700 Message-ID: <87ecxlqr31.fsf@wireframe> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2025-04-21, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: > as the date for the GCD 003 was set to February 18th, the discussion > period actually ended on Saturday already. I have incorporated some > changes on Sunday to realign the proposal with GCD 002 (the Codeberg > one), but barring any emergency changes there, GCD 003 is now to be > considered final. > > As outlined in GCD 001, please respond to this mail with one of the > following: > > - =E2=80=9CI support=E2=80=9D, meaning that you support the proposal; > - =E2=80=9CI accept=E2=80=9D, meaning that you consent to the implementat= ion of the > proposal; > - =E2=80=9CI disapprove=E2=80=9D, meaning that you oppose the implementat= ion of the > proposal. I accept. ...with reservations... While I initially had been inclined to "support" this as an issue of little consequence that would be simple enough to move forward with, there were some very strongly contrary responses that I feel went essentially unresolved. The nature of (at least some of) those responses were largely a negation that left little room to discuss how to move forward, which left me at an impass as to how to even continue the discussion. Only in retrospect of having encountered this situation did I realize there is a fundamental flaw in the GCD process (at least in my opinion)... in that there is a presumption of moving forward and accepting the proposed changes (in some capacity), rather than maintaining the status quo. E.g. a person has to propose improvements in order to reject the proposal, but there is nowhere in the process that handles a fundamental disagreement about the proposal in any form. This is contrary to any other genuine consensus process I have worked with. Which... is certainly out of scope for GCD 003 "Rename the default branch", but because it is a clear example of a flaw of this GCD process, figured it was worth noting. live well, vagrant --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQRlgHNhO/zFx+LkXUXcUY/If5cWqgUCaAaVYgAKCRDcUY/If5cW qtmVAQDY4AYxlKQfE7vmlzti7stKrhcDvLY8d3gMZjpCBviXDAEAl80c5z4E8olz ceJFZNr1UNhEogdYXQAjpDeQ8G1+8AU= =P7mn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Apr 2025 18:43:41 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 21 14:43:41 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38600 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1u6w7J-0002FV-8i for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 14:43:41 -0400 Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([212.103.80.154]:53938) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <christopher@HIDDEN>) id 1u6w7F-0002FF-QW for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 14:43:38 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mx.kolabnow.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 430643004C5B; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 20:43:31 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: ext-mx-out013.mykolab.com (amavis); dkim=pass reason="pass (just generated, assumed good)" header.d=librehacker.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=librehacker.com; h=content-type:content-type:mime-version:message-id:date:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:subject:from:from:received :received:received; s=dkim2; t=1745261011; x=1747075412; bh=OgTp wOJCCVj/6hmBfv0noH5oFsuEwYvR+LCBee4PhF0=; b=c2zJYabKUqv0CqhzuLZY FInmxPniNGteoogGnoyP55f/Mzdjo0dUE8v+U7B7IGYUQ+S/1yfgPMhP00djxsra VMIjeKlmZNIzL54QuynVb1IblLdyPGrUK7wFpvxzzPVpHhcxuV14yP9rJ9xGTOpk E1iedCKAiLvAMuRGahl/dzBQWbTlmaF/kD0b7tfhrFpZn/F0byFxVtSzk0H6h1FL tsF6OqKRBr+GHuHehcCeo2K0Hic6zBJlP4hmXftwUF6yBC2CtAH/cZJVHdZqTfuX AGsXNOkbSjl7Kv1OGQJtvjXW+7n2NRPc/9wCmtccnKm1lCXaOY+cS2I/9Tml5Tph fA== X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at mykolab.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ext-mx-out013.mykolab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id nuZ3qj7mRF_8; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 20:43:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from int-mx009.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.13.9]) by mx.kolabnow.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7A3A3004C50; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 20:43:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ext-subm010.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.6.10]) by int-mx009.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E22D20C284D; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 20:43:30 +0200 (CEST) From: Christopher Howard <christopher@HIDDEN> To: =?utf-8?Q?No=C3=A9?= Lopez <noelopez@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: Deliberation period for GCD 003 "Rename the default branch" has technically started In-Reply-To: <871ptlxubi.fsf@HIDDEN> (=?utf-8?Q?=22No=C3=A9?= Lopez"'s message of "Mon, 21 Apr 2025 20:06:57 +0200") References: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> <87tt6hwiiy.fsf@HIDDEN> <871ptlxubi.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 10:43:01 -0800 Message-ID: <87ldrtwe2y.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>, 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) > It seems like you are not a member of any team. This means you are not > eligible to vote on the GCD. Oh okay. The request for votes, address to "Guix", didn't mention the voter requirements. If you would that in future vote requests, you might avoid a lot of pointless responses. > > In any case, please explain your rationale for disapproval. To quote the > GCD process: > >>Thus, no decision is made against significant concerns; these concerns are >>actively resolved through counter proposals. A deliberating member >>disapproving a proposal bears a responsibility for finding alternatives, >>proposing ideas or code, or explaining the rationale for the status quo. > I am fundamentally opposed to avoiding the branch name "master", simply because this word supposedly has racist overtones. I perceive this is part of a larger CRT and PC movement that aims to eradicate from public consciousness and history anything that can be remotely connected to something that people find offensive. The branch name "master" has a long historical precedent. Furthermore, the branch name "master" is much more colorful and descriptive than "main". I like to think of the "master disk", which is a very important recording from which other copies are made. Also, even if the intended analogy of "master" was intended to refer to "master" and "slave" branches, that wouldn't make the word a bad choice, and is not an inherently racist idea. The concepts of "master" and "slave" can be used in computing to refer to software or networking architectures where some processes are totally subservient to others. Because we design some processes to be slaves to others, that doesn't mean that anyone is advocating for sailing off to foreign shores and kidnapping humans. Furthermore, isn't it offensive, to people whose ancestors actually were slaves, to go around eradicating from human memory all cultural, lexical, and historical references that might possibly remind us of the past existence of slavery? -- Christopher Howard
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Apr 2025 18:15:18 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 21 14:15:18 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38344 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1u6vfp-0005e5-3o for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 14:15:17 -0400 Received: from libre.brussels ([144.76.234.112]:55430) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <indieterminacy@HIDDEN>) id 1u6vfl-0005ba-NQ for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 14:15:15 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=libre.brussels; s=mail; t=1745259305; bh=yJbQUT8CEAJN9t38SYjvHLRaj/AmYn+yLo7ZdN2wxeo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=QL6Uv/3SRBEW2bLuZ4TKqya6dzOf+eynCENsTzWL9vW4hvKEWTQ5uya93xqE+z9Ee PHB0twELOnSwBoh7+Ta37iFCtLbkaeeALn7uLodPQIwtVIq7pw43Vm3ZG3mJPNzFxJ pMqnR+TDTdX+FNjlD70eVgW9oQ7cKKRaHAObM9vg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 18:15:05 +0000 From: indieterminacy <indieterminacy@HIDDEN> To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: Deliberation period for GCD 003 "Rename the default branch" has technically started In-Reply-To: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> References: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <4e42802cf2a55442ad3453e09626850b@HIDDEN> X-Sender: indieterminacy@HIDDEN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: guix-devel@HIDDEN, info-guix@HIDDEN, 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) “I accept” On 2025-04-21 14:07, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: > Hi Guix, > > as the date for the GCD 003 was set to February 18th, the discussion > period actually ended on Saturday already. I have incorporated some > changes on Sunday to realign the proposal with GCD 002 (the Codeberg > one), but barring any emergency changes there, GCD 003 is now to be > considered final. > > As outlined in GCD 001, please respond to this mail with one of the > following: > > - “I support”, meaning that you support the proposal; > - “I accept”, meaning that you consent to the implementation of the > proposal; > - “I disapprove”, meaning that you oppose the implementation of the > proposal. > > To count my own vote, I support the change of the default branch name > to “main”. > > Cheers (for future votes can the Deliberation period notice please provide a reference to the discussion page and the relevant GCD(s)) https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/guix-consensus-documents.git/tree/003-rename-default-branch.md?h=main Note the irony of the flag above -- if its fine on the savannah,... ;) https://issues.guix.gnu.org/76407 Jonathan McHugh
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Apr 2025 18:10:31 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 21 14:10:31 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38308 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1u6vbD-0005In-5b for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 14:10:31 -0400 Received: from msg-3.mailo.com ([213.182.54.8]:43490 helo=mailo.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <mail@HIDDEN>) id 1u6vb8-0005HR-PS for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 14:10:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nicolasgoaziou.fr; s=mailo; t=1745259018; bh=wdw6i4G4ojTVacBHg9W4jX2J9Rq6opU/k9HufZU8Bc4=; h=X-EA-Auth:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=baG3ena7raUmVnFcC2fzOQua6XOCrHlOKhDh8u1Lvtch0lDTxru3sA+2zo76hHQlt OLDuKH+j2MZl0VgLSg6AIl0a7C12D2i8Z9+iT1crDALRxU/ZTDE2o5mXRCeHeEHyuP hajWZS2ZOITpKBW1VtPNnaAAVYB9BkAoypE3EspA= Received: by b221-6.in.mailobj.net [192.168.90.26] with ESMTP via ip-20.mailobj.net [213.182.54.20] Mon, 21 Apr 2025 20:10:18 +0200 (CEST) X-EA-Auth: q9TG/U4tUsCqjiXICFhDolgAA/3eVDodPuJJTcjVWy66RKmqu7Y2EsBlwaABQhRLqDKqb+LhruZnYwuOHno5BPphXZXEhVvMgtZSyhWYMGk= From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@HIDDEN> To: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: [bug#76407] Deliberation period for GCD 003 "Rename the default branch" has technically started In-Reply-To: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel__8124.3238107831$1745244541$gmane$org@HIDDEN> (Liliana Marie Prikler's message of "Mon, 21 Apr 2025 16:07:14 +0200") References: <b900cd17b88123af3ae95f4e7d572e540f86e879.camel@HIDDEN> <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel__8124.3238107831$1745244541$gmane$org@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 20:10:02 +0200 Message-ID: <87zfg9qtc5.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> writes: > as the date for the GCD 003 was set to February 18th, the discussion > period actually ended on Saturday already. I have incorporated some > changes on Sunday to realign the proposal with GCD 002 (the Codeberg > one), but barring any emergency changes there, GCD 003 is now to be > considered final. I support. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Apr 2025 18:07:07 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 21 14:07:07 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38280 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1u6vXv-000539-3n for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 14:07:07 -0400 Received: from smtp1-g21.free.fr ([2a01:e0c:1:1599::10]:20028) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <noelopez@HIDDEN>) id 1u6vXs-00052x-T9 for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 14:07:05 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0a:990:a960:b4f3:8f44:ec4:5af5]) (Authenticated sender: noelopez@HIDDEN) by smtp1-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 31FF1B0053E; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 20:07:01 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=free.fr; s=smtp-20201208; t=1745258823; bh=GBzBR+madADRU8fLSL70ATTDB60fWWW3VEKhcTzu7bU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=l9QJjKWqJBcJ2j0C+svgX2HnRD4KWZ9b4HxTJyjHmf3K0HaGId7lnaxEhfxjgskbn /gIQF/+iHm/ygM+s9UKVRYTA2iW3TqROChZ0q71lcdi2o4PU18V3LftstyUq4+EKma LcmQCOPi1mEdC70jMO2rWWgx5RTmUKVD3AFanI67A9h7MLKcwkVdjRJSvirCE2UShe Zc28BhSid+KOwczzx6aVQAGLXxMvS6hZHMoKoaN/OOck/IK3AZwDzOWAhrgDi/YhS8 2JgmaJ9fpd1zTZbJEqev35IZ/QpG6OYPGTQ8H4oZPRQ3B0deDpJ1QzfLbj1OwL/oC8 1136pJBsnKnRw== From: =?utf-8?Q?No=C3=A9?= Lopez <noelopez@HIDDEN> To: Christopher Howard <christopher@HIDDEN>, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: Deliberation period for GCD 003 "Rename the default branch" has technically started In-Reply-To: <87tt6hwiiy.fsf@HIDDEN> References: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> <87tt6hwiiy.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 20:06:57 +0200 Message-ID: <871ptlxubi.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Christopher Howard <christopher@HIDDEN> writes: > I disapprove. > > --=20 > Christopher Howard Hi Christopher, It seems like you are not a member of any team. This means you are not eligible to vote on the GCD. In any case, please explain your rationale for disapproval. To quote the GCD process: >Thus, no decision is made against significant concerns; these concerns are >actively resolved through counter proposals. A deliberating member >disapproving a proposal bears a responsibility for finding alternatives, >proposing ideas or code, or explaining the rationale for the status quo. Have a nice day, No=C3=A9 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQHFBAEBCAAvFiEEXVTPJVeyOOiNwYCiLSIyQQq3QEMFAmgGiUERHG5vZWxvcGV6 QGZyZWUuZnIACgkQLSIyQQq3QEOahAwAmFVePJkSjm/tjy0h4kCPLXLeATBaRyDA xE3dTit3SWHgoDn9mA2LEb8suY1nsDJmhhR16+BepKT52rO4aFsWPyK24hhA7xog O1F138qrAO6l8pAHkFpE2hYfqw5HbB9LFjgfqiYNiS7FZiN1xAfHClNK1uwircyV u+W2RX7qUrdGZ1ieqLOekZtfI5+ppgMSjUajLnB4PsNuUWm1o87x7EP4mpxx59Rx vKkbPDO1fQK+qiq7ZxPhvKrzQcGV8BWR6L2RHHHAQ8JmAi1LNjZOrK2hsdXW7fql 9Py/AnRf1qKw2QDLrjlfHSzVmEMcXBSiQnNQjZEdyOFUEl4BWk9B1V7EwdOcRjBj Qp/vH9YfSXVvzgldvHxMOyGjdhRd0/0piy1cMAomzHztH/pJjS7WUNTPFsvaHHVU GibBrmhPzsf++nR719lNj7/VL+ul6qMd886gVJdMl7MWcmzNNO+UiPIEyMz2oCp0 QTpuPyw4qq3MpSE1RSI3w7FZ9boHSH8j =L2iX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Apr 2025 18:05:23 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 21 14:05:23 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38258 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1u6vWF-0004vg-CW for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 14:05:23 -0400 Received: from dane.soverin.net ([185.233.34.25]:43137) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ekaitz@HIDDEN>) id 1u6vW9-0004pf-Ae for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 14:05:18 -0400 Received: from smtp.soverin.net (c04smtp-lb01.int.sover.in [10.10.4.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dane.soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ZhCvV2bGlzyNy; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 18:05:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.soverin.net (smtp.soverin.net [10.10.4.100]) by soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4ZhCvT6YryzJt; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 18:05:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.soverin.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=elenq.tech header.i=@elenq.tech header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=soverin1 header.b=eGXKSd5w; dkim-atps=neutral DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=elenq.tech; s=soverin1; t=1745258710; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=+NbmTuYuYq0SPtCLCsss9fPg30QX2M+I9c5JLcDXgWg=; b=eGXKSd5wFfYa7Ey3gjlGD7J8REP7UCr+13s6rLhJ9NB3TvvxSNfWRYIUpoIcyXGk9BTUlp +Tuh9CPvJYiq6l89dIXuy2F2gkUpqw5wlbhn7QEnGBI+Ul5HIBNhGrHdpWZtNhnPdCUAbg l4iwpgCvoRmMdCExHuFM4GEc+IhPbbZm6yPs8IDxDGG8oYmhkOSxzDCtWyM8GFXyNbwSVL QutG/h+pGhSnlUpyF8CWSpdcHealFkCQhvnTXlEfUzW9yfkSXByNwncnvkOKK8vSapb/pJ ZAkbU/IcQPfqiskF0KagCXyhxOlro4IFwsohPeY2CFg2v+TMYlnDgeu42+Za4Q== X-CM-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=UsCZN/wB c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=680688d6 a=GfXQuWAYjYMZp4ahSyumlQ==:117 a=GfXQuWAYjYMZp4ahSyumlQ==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=MKtGQD3n3ToA:10 a=1oJP67jkp3AA:10 a=e0jjEgBCjsD4Je2xMAIA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=yPy0HX4kI4LsAlP3oO-2:22 X-CM-Envelope: MS4xfKNHuZEp5hUtpjzTH1YfIs5mEzUhgj3ZKMoe8QOjfEQ9ZOg9HygSkTWbKa9ANzYO0Hh10eTfpGlT1x3nY6rDYzwT+48liASwFVlLmu5TKHkpYJ80EdZi ydrI1+umW48OZ+WA3idSn/XQCZXaO8g4R+X+LfLmAhgLLSXAAL/VaNkHvxuL8nm6xlrnZVLdW1mVdrBOUlTU5tr//vARUGm1yq7oxu/17wYR0raF4Stlszwz YzSXdk2jM90JNx3B2M/dxw== Message-ID: <3b65669a-9aa7-4ecd-9019-75538244efd0@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 20:05:09 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Deliberation period for GCD 003 "Rename the default branch" has technically started To: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org References: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> <CAJ=RwfZp4iwSZvm+b1Kk1gp_yhRekpQraN2oF2pffP-yXv8Yag@HIDDEN> Content-Language: en-US, es-ES, eu From: Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN> Autocrypt: addr=ekaitz@HIDDEN; keydata= xsFNBGcvh/QBEACePF16wEeQaqfJNgeaSQB6ty6PzLaYtl8UVApPSCF1PYNEhDtxQOOpBXeu k6h68cjhRX7hmug8mAraXotw4aG4Z3kbUro4fzXOYW3rCi/mAm5NFXLUmBX3E1AV1pcD8hDA 5s3LeGzfTo4xRGTW4zTzxGEyrvbChkVib7wTSk52a/WkFas6l3sXnepF8HmIEOWkwQcYdcuo gaNDFP1kjZYvqfKJXmCZnY+lC8Zfe/vlD/x8FZQYBQ5xgXIfbSR0xlRz/XIHfJv6j+3myUUr 2UKMku1dkjlkhNkyfw+RypQzmbJ0oJ4bk76/ju0nnlN65/LvyeTVUh/2O2VnPnZ49keL8sqr APXF4di4pWT+/mPxfoEtiSDtjyzbr8+ajcwLa4SSKLlexqjZj8X6R4tt31Rf/Pliwe4TdPmd 2leE3BIJl9bAuslEvd5tqZ1oa3Zfb62tvpaJCRYMtOEWuGkYdyrwTW7UXJPQpam4X7WoW2jW c5aTpAnpnqIPzaWJmua1lGQjEXgt4xvVdhVmZq32fkTy/rXw9l5a+XU7N4/Zz8AR/0xO+UBc Q1J+wHADjL8Q0v0tZLEaiWL72AsxN3GMWNPXWAplaTPUNPUlNK0JPHwhTX/cQVkIc9avSKc3 BeUofC96d13I7QmRjQ0gcBaLtV9lMOuYwbC+6tb70x2fQsI3bwARAQABzSJFa2FpdHogWmFy cmFnYSA8ZWthaXR6QGVsZW5xLnRlY2g+wsGUBBMBCAA+FiEEXb4j05BTZSZ/jMdq/blSvT9z VtYFAmcvh/QCGwMFCQPCZwAFCwkIBwIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQ/blSvT9zVtbW CRAAkbla35s8RKhQBweqwEcdYDV2Zpt16OgENymjLs/qhh7Y9WgWZ0YraSNYDGCt6lemhior vrXX48+yZC98c8ZgCrr4Hmt8i/6TvJqVhwlZ9//3W/z/YuYDtUPBzRHgwM8tejiXmNqYM8lF Jg64pQaczmGAR29Xf0WTQegSociBSUg9eC7BS74Uh7UbHCgytyretoKmqJAp8SKE/Czt5x4R lXKVgGawzg1GerriwnNbudy0eyl1q0Pn7Q+K+tQ14EPDAM+QsGR/fBV4a3uYP6sBF+SdM+DO LX5MRVbWJ8O3kLmbAKQeLgSLlnYydMY/mTvjgxMAakfGCA4q69gmyDSB0fzAUm3c1JV5VwIo 63rykiOEB/k2m4aiiujH5kOC86sjb273+XXWlOhOEO/vKHHdAh+B7dnEEYUPXnUEMQ23PaF4 22u7C62kw3yH/krKr60t5FxcqNWtCOxEWc0WMZw12Q3Gw8+9oA5DI/f4gjlGvQiQWqj6dvoX vIDmifr0R3sTi6xh+udu2Rp8PsKOW8ZRyQ0/VOiwzBfQkf4PFowaiRp8LnkjLEVft6ruuA1h awO2SKKJ8WpgZPw5oMigZR5DgbunxMD4BcqmD7bSoTRV/ljx1I8UgAaQLPqVVnLt31iENtLv 43kPHl56AbYpAzcvf8nGU3KPhGOoByyuyph4RYDOwU0EZy+H9AEQANc9vw7DnBeNGKhq1Bg5 oiGII7npGXCChe7PB6CJjkvN6n1kXrvBYsaORXvZJPNgmBTKu/ETGYS0t0YeGlI4WTOK9dgB /7T8dngRmrGjPmZjryzfk18tXnJq0zoLixLizDT3FqV4jOG5KjPTxQvpdBMiX9oX4Je2OMqF d14fopLGav0rW7Fh5p83OSREpXbJUJJiUaH3p9U9Ss8IBHzr669PViAqe09EfxL/L0l1JIFj HQjJcg01PUXZAW6aPtd7q6eNCSLTXYPiDRQe2GdRUcB7WfqCogR/LEpzLLcd0NkxCnc0T6da rq2Dupt8rvQ95L4/cOGVcDUDOGE6U92XCkaCvUQkypxQCGKSEjbTFoLRG/4JQj0pAWSaqxPS 7hkTFql4qUAdRwzHN1ib6XedcFfqHSy2Mk5ttW8DaBGKhCm7Mn6+4smXENHSuQxCqHlCQ2m+ 9ogpbxavNVfAblE/ucxyfyo6FlDbGHEG3Yu5296kUPT7PqZLiR3KetMPJfCLY2jVPio3t4tD s7Sj41sG5aIwEApb0Zoz3bPBt5O5GUoPFnXyjO306WLxXrM2tjY38jwHxF1Qvs3HQTJgRei2 g3D3KiiR27cXXs/8lrr8tblr5J1tE4TaQCea5lDuEgTCDLnlcopoYcKpFAUBGQtzcNkudT9w sM2nf9y6INcUE3FlABEBAAHCwXwEGAEIACYWIQRdviPTkFNlJn+Mx2r9uVK9P3NW1gUCZy+H 9AIbDAUJA8JnAAAKCRD9uVK9P3NW1td1D/4xx8AbDKAKx9ezT6GdTZbK6FS66qRQCEzTa5MX ZCEogASOla71CB10l5fFtsRWCtNQLzmgwkFwhdxyjqendDgacc5v/71NBb5KpKni6wDJMeiG s3Lq3ZgWfHte3NZ99iSH+La3aBSFbCloJ/Yf/MJBkzrm1sTTKcgF9/i0pzkume5vtpKRDjjS z4abHu7qk4Sgi5gwWpoKFTT38q6nLP+9SUla3JJjNqU3gvn8kwv6KDMKc4marnSp/c+5O6E+ lNrxMdD0n8+io/Bf/UEI6BU8F7JshPq732bHN1NzUXvgMd4cNsAlvsWM8UCKZ4/usFl1euMM FOvnadZinsTHpXhahJzkYWA7nAKbCoNNq9LPtWxfjHsIfhs+QQafF31Pw+jqHqruB4tH0eiL abrz7kejaZvJdVipNIzRUWYnpP+18khep2UtT1n9VNs6QNb4cHPsoe+s4ga4ZK/klCdEhLya XtbcaNEHb7NZUOBj3HhKFgIY8PD1AptAObHjsUNF5+jfEnl+5WjwyTZTIgDRiOrwn8LWOANQ 0JpR69t06uJwmiogQgnlYe36YFaauHGQZFa+L+R2zgnGn8TnR4C3tH7gNAef9+PKqgmJT5pN IkFzlDmZi05E9xzhj4WQ/OOsqU64eHL2PaDk+2TdfrzNwNFbkABJ+C7BHNAytQ6h9cpUbg== In-Reply-To: <CAJ=RwfZp4iwSZvm+b1Kk1gp_yhRekpQraN2oF2pffP-yXv8Yag@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spampanel-Class: ham X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@HIDDEN>, info-guix@HIDDEN X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) I disapprove
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Apr 2025 17:38:08 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 21 13:38:08 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37968 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1u6v5r-0002m1-Lg for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 13:38:07 -0400 Received: from smtp1-g21.free.fr ([2a01:e0c:1:1599::10]:60938) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <noelopez@HIDDEN>) id 1u6v5m-0002lL-Fw for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 13:38:05 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0a:990:a960:b4f3:8f44:ec4:5af5]) (Authenticated sender: noelopez@HIDDEN) by smtp1-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DBA37B0059A; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 19:37:58 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=free.fr; s=smtp-20201208; t=1745257080; bh=ci/QSLbxVm/TR9iRfDgJ5GPLQGB2pWnsY8sgZvDoBXU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=C5vNGDJk0aldbxj94LFzcECkbEtt+5wUWfodBJxE0vQhiNPWivYL9PWBp76kaYP/w Em4q0NaUMpGCz77ogascJLpTAx0CXBfVl3N5R5mYJvw3ASDXby2L4/O5iW+ARiWdA6 bbjmbNaaMFMMfXuBcyrd2kuaQwbT8SHClZJOK9+RGDPAuEDX438sM8gP9+nI+b9wBi 6hMGMI1tfS+RSUtEEsHhZH9PpM6ob7lWfGQSH4HiBlZFLyjaeFbCO8pU5gKZSdp9SJ Pp3+yIMhhNfDKUzf4TIf+xx90OGH1ehdbl+ogSJb15lGFbsgEwv1oenZyS0izQiuIw 7cERqznSxjQjg== From: =?utf-8?Q?No=C3=A9?= Lopez <noelopez@HIDDEN> To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: Deliberation period for GCD 003 "Rename the default branch" has technically started In-Reply-To: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> References: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 19:37:53 +0200 Message-ID: <877c3dxvny.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> writes: > Hi Guix, > > as the date for the GCD 003 was set to February 18th, the discussion > period actually ended on Saturday already. I have incorporated some > changes on Sunday to realign the proposal with GCD 002 (the Codeberg > one), but barring any emergency changes there, GCD 003 is now to be > considered final. > > As outlined in GCD 001, please respond to this mail with one of the > following: > > - =E2=80=9CI support=E2=80=9D, meaning that you support the proposal; > - =E2=80=9CI accept=E2=80=9D, meaning that you consent to the implementat= ion of the > proposal; > - =E2=80=9CI disapprove=E2=80=9D, meaning that you oppose the implementat= ion of the > proposal. > > To count my own vote, I support the change of the default branch name > to =E2=80=9Cmain=E2=80=9D. > > Cheers I accept. P.S. The link in =E2=80=9COn other channels=E2=80=9D has the wrong syntax. = The link and label are swapped. =2D [https://issues.guix.gnu.org/49252](HEAD may be used freely) + [HEAD may be used freely](https://issues.guix.gnu.org/49252) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQHFBAEBCAAvFiEEXVTPJVeyOOiNwYCiLSIyQQq3QEMFAmgGgnIRHG5vZWxvcGV6 QGZyZWUuZnIACgkQLSIyQQq3QEOCnQwAzHKNJh3yM4i81u8LQq1jmzX95pp81mZn 8bn26a8OT9QBcDCXHuAUSCB9f7PldOZGEcgpN54qTg7Xh683XtZmWsWk2+CglMkg BhV5OmgOpwLI4bEf2D1YYmjna1LhdkkJZ082xPoGeh7wZDpOjGcWC2QnRI9i+lJk V3yt3VqShykMekcDU9gOlvS6N2K0itJ1sRrxEy79ONv9c3OBv6MR/5m8ekPZA8G6 t1z8NqISgjk9v9FgtXxGXU+AWgnII+xeVq33yp+EQ+soARU8pXcfSKV9TUSodelD 1jg7LmEK2jUAt9XHt/3D3kICvy7IiqXlyJ3F9/PW/fFe2XoDYV3M2lT4p57NoVws VdTmyI8FKIsrYIxSxd0G9cKNMvSFv+CkbD1HMd0MDM6mWj69HV3QpVsdk773ZDqP 2g8qVrB8r0GroSRvFLRG4PjvzalYIuMqX5Aa7+fC9xJPX/XGdoScJIzxH9lMtqkW Jx1j1VmnQg2f9LdmU9y1t+bxAwyfq/Bc =ychG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Apr 2025 17:17:22 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 21 13:17:21 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37801 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1u6ull-00019l-G8 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 13:17:21 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x62b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::62b]:61801) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <dthompson2@HIDDEN>) id 1u6ulg-00019P-VM for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 13:17:18 -0400 Received: by mail-ej1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-ac29fd22163so642736666b.3 for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 10:17:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=worcester.edu; s=google; t=1745255831; x=1745860631; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=N2x1A0A0VACVNVVHtwhSvAUUWkTJ6ziGSWUJL3EWmsk=; b=GhIry7Ip2Y+d7RuqBqJm+Zf5PBIHNSZX/S7+yiP8qwUIv4sOZzRdrzwrvEcwwlLkqS mgveNIikD7NwiLvvwfMUv2J8DKErfos+ChW3b/02jOCl2XgDidfq3G6iOB8c4pXciYFA t5U95m+i9Qc66s95FiGPR0n/yIEIlmXuVAPbw= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1745255831; x=1745860631; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=N2x1A0A0VACVNVVHtwhSvAUUWkTJ6ziGSWUJL3EWmsk=; b=xOS+8ASfyuEpjeYV6x/1EVcLTw12sgG1okr3USpMXPhpALIjADZIAdg9y2DjidYekp u47rwZv3QWA32ogY/BRkWTePW7FYXWJMc0aXrhLWUqELc484ex36fBO8rVK1q9fwom9n O+j5r4GyBGVhbGeXeEYs81uaeqsKmJ+jnX6rM7P2RUuW8cj4Ir13tSPUaon0HXg8sx+1 5rBdHxT6kAgRKk3X06jAC24ZpuodBBfiZll9KnOzIYEwQJ0RQeAkRDZADyEiDMl/GO62 4tJd0miAyNGvT+eswtPlTILTMglPUtRiaII4EV6nhkK0K64NZGn3y9wbwJb0GIobKEwp i1Ow== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXat/KbHyVH03gd012uhTM57s+Q04UhcmrhiXqTzcNVSbeOfWgVOCIOm81Fsg9cn31I+NH+Zg==@debbugs.gnu.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz4P+6yImKm3J0IyQah6mZLeg11S9C+NX8i16Vex6YV2nhT7Sh1 VyVkiv1Zgy4SJb/Pddu7E39zmXxjz5GqW300q6QdnsZYB0krXw7OuLIkSeVZ1wBDgy38O9UUgNE 8cjKL2bJ/IAMnj49J8fF44OfpPHXOqgG8APTd3w== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuEYv0RqBNO637BgWbApgJToo1sXvEbcAmQLac+PP4v6IBJ8L27wSUGtwf1gfd UU5sMidSXaJ1peLP8VQEVfNEaYjPHRunva1MB13YSt5lG3V1NJI9H+KrblCsvItS5rRD7v3wZ47 i6FfJ/zARNT7LQsMgwia7hF1CS6uFPfAgIeR0UU1YsG3/GRnc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEZw/qdnXGGeV6S8PiVW5I9b/8/QWHk+92ZiP+mnusFv9EQHqd4mUP9qBQusHvIv2MwU+Gz+yLz3Cnt3gbAOL8= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2d29:b0:ac7:b7:c0ce with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-acb74dd3342mr1065564466b.53.1745255829949; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 10:17:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> From: "Thompson, David" <dthompson2@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 13:16:59 -0400 X-Gm-Features: ATxdqUF5LVDv3lE_-drX1arqTwqzmpjeJyZ04skZzMqgwUgGLfz0gDPL3Is9Wwo Message-ID: <CAJ=RwfZp4iwSZvm+b1Kk1gp_yhRekpQraN2oF2pffP-yXv8Yag@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: Deliberation period for GCD 003 "Rename the default branch" has technically started To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@HIDDEN>, info-guix@HIDDEN, 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) I support. - Dave
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Apr 2025 17:07:40 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 21 13:07:40 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37737 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1u6ucO-0000Qx-60 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 13:07:40 -0400 Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([212.103.80.154]:40128) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <christopher@HIDDEN>) id 1u6ucL-0000Qe-PU for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 13:07:38 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mx.kolabnow.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C61403004C5B; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 19:07:31 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: ext-mx-out013.mykolab.com (amavis); dkim=pass reason="pass (just generated, assumed good)" header.d=librehacker.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=librehacker.com; h=content-type:content-type:mime-version:message-id:date:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:subject:from:from:received :received:received; s=dkim2; t=1745255251; x=1747069652; bh=Gl0z T3RfDFQibLkG877snUQ9BmZThdP/AEdqr/TWN2Q=; b=mLMj+6RyDkDa+fG9JAHF he8u2WCT9WybeeejtB9KxRWB/kDgA4yvirTjP1xZFy5mO6nNSIiQFSj3qkd9Wp5F xto9tJXAYHHbYZmameLTw58wlZC61/rMVscpCCL8XHxZK3NhzxRJLShxd7UWq63D N7gn3ODyPVmRQQNH0Y9j0L6HRxXtrkQp/aHyUks2349ReBR0a4MeEFNB7/jHGXyf SL9RBE2i7GjGPn3zKV40nurIzg4at+CKTjIWQwxlCZHJSSnlTZSyhTbpS+IrBaiA M+j5+lypni/rFdNC0KsXhgB28U28tF4HYOiZGi+9x3fi6QT6EJ8s57v52JNqjXvU 2w== X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at mykolab.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ext-mx-out013.mykolab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id Le7Rbf5XJVXu; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 19:07:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from int-mx011.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.13.11]) by mx.kolabnow.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8973C3004C50; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 19:07:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ext-subm010.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.6.10]) by int-mx011.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E8493244D8A; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 19:07:30 +0200 (CEST) From: Christopher Howard <christopher@HIDDEN> To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: Deliberation period for GCD 003 "Rename the default branch" has technically started In-Reply-To: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> (Liliana Marie Prikler's message of "Mon, 21 Apr 2025 16:07:14 +0200") References: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 09:07:01 -0800 Message-ID: <87tt6hwiiy.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: guix-devel@HIDDEN, info-guix@HIDDEN, 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) I disapprove. -- Christopher Howard
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Apr 2025 16:18:50 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 21 12:18:50 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37310 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1u6tr7-0004xz-9o for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 12:18:49 -0400 Received: from mail-yw1-x1133.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::1133]:48477) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <gboskovits@HIDDEN>) id 1u6tdW-0003gz-W3 for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 12:04:47 -0400 Received: by mail-yw1-x1133.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-70575d66612so32949557b3.1 for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 09:04:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1745251481; x=1745856281; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=/0TmWQhnD3vwpkUT8lBbndXkoFfQ5lp293ujI/sA4uA=; b=hIwa4HXibxxi0VxHtH7RfTSBb2JtanH9k8wnKP9qKSW1MJLdvCw/TXRrHko60gVDSo kPBjPSc1m5GeqX4QadcF6xIgPCOCzUtK7ql98oCB7c5fTPOuMSKKvrkC3n690ll2Zm/I njpSwKZ1K7w+8snZCE7JvqjUSK56rPfvU6earKnxZgO8UDHX1MsD56mp+UJG2AjbAX2v TgJ9klSkWew8Svgu2FbEXSrWADEgKI8we9mVJCPFgULYzt3m8pTu62iftL0FU0Mb9GaE 05qB185qsQHlq+J6RibnuqFV0Nm0SZwMmx6bNC2HNEHhlRExYmMQBJ/sCOxu6hEXRsPJ MX1w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1745251481; x=1745856281; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=/0TmWQhnD3vwpkUT8lBbndXkoFfQ5lp293ujI/sA4uA=; b=TzKZuSSAXRD/G6+dkNrQJIuntQ0NYbe0s/HvSar25o8r9t1niN8LQOUPdvO+YZz7DG DyDXlmHaceAWHTIyxpPpLnCcdW3U1anKxH1EXepi0yjfalE5xoJt40tLorwMjc+UMkyw ID96hr/68bzx2qE0GVY5TgiMZXU6hI+LXAnCWaGEIdCY2Exy+2eQxZYwORXGDKXsWG2Y WfZG1t9a16IAFQDzsxbR+cMftPjJNQl0bPfgzRmOl3U3oMO9Zut3YoHEImjKrURLMG+z zYjXiDDe87B5XJzFUPpNfhiExrdAa+gxpcRNXRH38n/v+3aRhw45iKmiJCfUYebPHaqE 0inw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVUGoorq10mQ3coI+Luk2z82KJKVSz9aqcHrIft9KWwksDxvaNxgf1sxT1p9D5h4yHHFR8AXg==@debbugs.gnu.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxZup/GA+G7JE7v9/c5yjrdALnd6/1Rks/oVwGRbOUbsu7bjAkx OuUnV2GdGfhPvUHKMXbqjfgFFR8D6zuLjMeKER4kEVtFlfTLfSrMgLqDOfhT4cIhCJfs1wTu7AW KNK64gPWtEcVeTlTCUv/UUnuaIFE= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvKt2PVgzOEkwlD3+IFjKHm4FK/rjflNS5RCwmXbOuhPpqF0gN2XD6B7zL5YmI I7fPa9Ql2kCmr1YTHz7qbgb+3KYolFlXm/gfYhmW6LGtxjVV8wa8gQR+piP+7rdws4NWGAZrRxs 1UZrfX7qi2Eb250GHX6CeZ31qCh8MN2S+grz1ORIVWpgWIK+CNkhHsRXPj X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGMEPjy+5bIdARaNkSbj+jeEQvDBXslbEu1iVidnmphblfBks58I7U7t1j68FLsL0Fd09rTAM86qr0KhcZX4v8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:2085:b0:e6d:f3ca:3e15 with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-e7297da7a7amr15878120276.3.1745251480366; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 09:04:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> From: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor_Boskovits?= <gboskovits@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 18:04:28 +0200 X-Gm-Features: ATxdqUGJGaTWtaAOejtimWBeu3s7P2anGzLkCmKsqlmVbicrrcjATP-2qU32-3E Message-ID: <CAAqdTgN8TwOpw+MCLzJbdWy2LtH19EEtwnkRaksHAfsMD=hMfw@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: Deliberation period for GCD 003 "Rename the default branch" has technically started To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 12:18:47 -0400 Cc: guix-devel@HIDDEN, info-guix@HIDDEN, 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) I accept. Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> ezt =C3=ADrta (id=C5=91po= nt: 2025. =C3=A1pr. 21., H, 16:07): > > Hi Guix, > > as the date for the GCD 003 was set to February 18th, the discussion > period actually ended on Saturday already. I have incorporated some > changes on Sunday to realign the proposal with GCD 002 (the Codeberg > one), but barring any emergency changes there, GCD 003 is now to be > considered final. > > As outlined in GCD 001, please respond to this mail with one of the > following: > > - =E2=80=9CI support=E2=80=9D, meaning that you support the proposal; > - =E2=80=9CI accept=E2=80=9D, meaning that you consent to the implementat= ion of the > proposal; > - =E2=80=9CI disapprove=E2=80=9D, meaning that you oppose the implementat= ion of the > proposal. > > To count my own vote, I support the change of the default branch name > to =E2=80=9Cmain=E2=80=9D. > > Cheers >
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Apr 2025 15:19:06 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 21 11:19:06 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36697 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1u6svK-0007dc-5M for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 11:19:06 -0400 Received: from sender4-of-o51.zoho.com ([136.143.188.51]:21152) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rekado@HIDDEN>) id 1u6svC-0007cA-Ka for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 11:18:59 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1745248725; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=JrZX8UKXXxCqLRZ9RW7BST/mAbqHxa/OP0hKwjWwth2vizkKSyQMa+UXmFygYOh7dqxcQO/IY6tiiUhL/coP8N0KAPicHSYEO7nPcE5uSD1ceJtvMkLipRgNXjc9Rl5l20xbgrkfUjMXdcK4awUshnK7qVbvbo3TNLN3ejrNNcM= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1745248725; h=Content-Type:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:From:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:Subject:To:To:Message-Id:Reply-To; bh=isA+i6Yx8m15AzWBzgRSZmG9ldqlusnHNI0lA1dhjIs=; b=lNwRATLfKWS0kpDSiYT2IqgtqxmXgt84FiIvN4cGaKqp3+/PCu6/DFNyjjMZteJupTV0BwcdzyUZOB2TQthRnJckdlrEIkafyCO7xYVO7nPJlx6b/pUFgyQcKwMjHQ5TowpeB5z/KrheQE3E5s4rGRu5sidXhj2V/9g+aUey8Lg= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@HIDDEN; dmarc=pass header.from=<rekado@HIDDEN> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1745248725; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@HIDDEN; h=From:From:To:To:Cc:Cc:Subject:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:Reply-To; bh=isA+i6Yx8m15AzWBzgRSZmG9ldqlusnHNI0lA1dhjIs=; b=fVSsuF+hTW/U1GhTrhLsck7Y/1pJttWl5nOOusel2kSK1IEmQmGfKcRvosWBbXnI TNUk4Zs1nk1XW+EbAAML3xiaY+7NSZZjLDMDsCcE1XmJaPym0cfGj7LypgADiDcLLlj +oFHeCfUhwAwX6B25BywZF9Awic5qJUKSysvYAZE= Received: by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1745248721681361.51224616689433; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 08:18:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@HIDDEN> To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: Deliberation period for GCD 003 "Rename the default branch" has technically started In-Reply-To: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> (Liliana Marie Prikler's message of "Mon, 21 Apr 2025 16:07:14 +0200") References: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.9; emacs 29.4 Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 17:18:38 +0200 Message-ID: <87y0vtilv5.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: guix-devel@HIDDEN, 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) I accept. -- Ricardo
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Apr 2025 15:18:09 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 21 11:18:09 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36670 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1u6suO-0007Wh-VG for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 11:18:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55358) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1u6suM-0007Vs-5T for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 11:18:06 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1u6suG-0002qr-HL; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 11:18:00 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=E+EvSPKAEF89KtxcheMqfnj0dHXID5+an1U1Xy5JnHU=; b=EJFV9SmQkWi9f++gY1Uq kIEqek0JiNE3rNjYSr7eBNrPJXS09jqFwwYWEmh9rjhdtleQG/u5wX5M3y6cJ3hv/D02p/0OH0jlV 0HcX+MY7nFJon/goOb+W3auaUwFY5Q++Ksc8p5xK7iGjggXcyXxGkz99pZ6glnRTWS2ToPG3sTvVy p1j+nbOdsqfeJAnyInvRkcBxPySj6Jd+718APDMXhEm4JD/4m/WBlAyW64WsEM0b56qlxIubi4JBT V010ghOATmenE8ysKvDw78KN9cTeYii7TjPtXb5EU+1zmtyIPXuoi/Dwo+llkcXvx9z1zFfkZrkT8 Sfex/Su9J+4bLw==; From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: Deliberation period for GCD 003 "Rename the default branch" has technically started In-Reply-To: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> (Liliana Marie Prikler's message of "Mon, 21 Apr 2025 16:07:14 +0200") References: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.9; emacs 29.4 X-URL: https://people.bordeaux.inria.fr/lcourtes/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu X-Revolutionary-Date: Duodi 2 =?utf-8?Q?Flor=C3=A9al?= an 233 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution=2C?= jour du =?utf-8?Q?Ch=C3=AAne?= Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 16:39:36 +0200 Message-ID: <8734e1a89j.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Liliana, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> writes: > as the date for the GCD 003 was set to February 18th, the discussion > period actually ended on Saturday already. I have incorporated some > changes on Sunday to realign the proposal with GCD 002 (the Codeberg > one), but barring any emergency changes there, GCD 003 is now to be > considered final. I support. Ludo=E2=80=99. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJBBAEBCgArFiEEPORkVYqE/cadtAz7CQsRmT2a67UFAmgGWLQNHGx1ZG9AZ251 Lm9yZwAKCRAJCxGZPZrrtQ3vD/9dIvCuHVS4nAg9NORKNhTU2UfWyioEKa2Z3GIW +dSsBXt1vuc0ZO8BxYisnARsDnDknAARP0Xx5jeWNx7+FuxympZQ4LkForDcCgFM Qworv6I906CZJpy5BgNe/30+qXLchWFs/3sExppKhnsej92SCZrzB9dhb2sMQ+s7 9B6ateQfgCnTqDr6ysfZaifp7T+4ol/Ze0bqx7yJwaeJlKDdXskK2ZhFuquVRCVJ dhUGKq0XMgsLlgb0FoRpsWNDXgJaxrXOyAS9z6gQccX4BgoZHHevfwWZ4GLmCkVZ KEVQDO/JkKLuCygVhPco5Upj6tgz9y98+/Td/cquH4omxVnxgk/VxXeitgNTkCZq caKbA1ebzS6TYtnligqeg+FyErRS7yU9uHTyBL5yQjMYsPZTusgvFqUclw/5McML aX+9ZbaVAozwb4WJPYOnWNeuF0jLOnZhqs4PiGEXcp0uI3tR8EX+0LWER/eiyhAj oYvhF6okzTD3hmQgxQE0TAgSwHsYCkd0d2WvgdTWVP1rDagQ1X1QxfNL4oB8ZN/1 FIe/hvpLt1L3T80RN13Eo0Tr4e8yhastX/k6zhZmjzVLh0QxR2EfsGaAamlFVUGo eYa48N5aWcxdLeaNHz4cbzkckzEKE0JlyUXoAtKjyRuP+SYW/H9Xk8uY/Ny6EqMB mZj14w== =T0cy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Apr 2025 14:07:27 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 21 10:07:27 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35732 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1u6rnz-0001bg-6b for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 10:07:27 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x341.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::341]:42304) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>) id 1u6rnv-0001b9-Fz for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 10:07:24 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-x341.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-43cfa7e7f54so27786235e9.1 for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 07:07:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1745244437; x=1745849237; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:date:cc:to:from :subject:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=gbFE7PLzDrJkg/y7NBnhAI9aXPyR8y954qtgX+hIDEQ=; b=Dd9gKiIT5IhN2ABAn0s1s9eBy3yr9gfqVNiQ4Ux7/9TnVA4Sb5buubi07ytliOSRlk lTk6urMttGRJmZZ4pB9+77qvaRx4Q4LqBr/wUoYs6MYrlYufdkvyNtU0s8+T76HmPawQ OVVZ9Qg17y+EOCkI02PGtvuHLNH4+z2fEj37AVrnMBxMvWbU2Pq/BapZn1SPsyLjtnPe NBA79mXM0hIFn/Qv7vhfh8Nno5/G9uXXvdenmM9v49Uq477qR2iiZIFUlhWiFQalgnfd Qbemx6m0tYO1oHDQ/71dI2NWqDq/MtE/XxkztN1goMx/Iro61D9/yxe0XI0eN35fbsl9 CVHw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1745244437; x=1745849237; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:date:cc:to:from :subject:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=gbFE7PLzDrJkg/y7NBnhAI9aXPyR8y954qtgX+hIDEQ=; b=PpFMxqYNQ7Co3chBbvYFl5Ospx7kq9u8IkMDFg6uWT+ls9rCh3WM+qZb3T6DwYUZ/A gu8lNkUkVRSkWj0K0vCjWebvUd2CO0iTz35XfOxuJGIiE2PKd9c7aci6f4R5FzCDhqhI IvONA63/Au21kJnFGZOO1lhXcHB84dOUI3GgJo+2eSQZvvZIRA9/usn7C4hlY2VQVV+2 KHnNomE71Tqr4X8kVU1sq5qqoFB5mdOEcVTEQC//XFh2h/N1fKjP7tRkbt2qiWtkCC5p qjmWdMnEeDBOeH7+FA/f2Iy/1XWVm0/CLvtmYNGWVSFs6MrnJOhCWV8Tc/7JF4vAs0VG lUqQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy7xGMbXIpDacP6dxiNpJSp/JSAdvPY6eEFs4JGCjEhtjmnqCtB 8Qyr7sfIBL7BSDP7vJLqXTofdMLQ0GiV4eY4hs9pR8eTPKrfDQQy X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuT3Dvekqog6uZeMIwJXHBmvg7B+7CIiwdHQajfhBn4DrkkoPYWcpuaROraA76 k7tgRr8JLEH8z1VVuLVXXQUjtVl/qHH10g8+ZBOodoU/DukCfZupGWX795tXV1sNIY7S3sghHz0 gmHuhfuftqNlW4nfQsr+8HW2IiuNahYQfVB2Oig2A+3+uUyABuQF1XsGDvP/bsBKAS/zTyoSN/2 BJX791MpyyerWFdKWyg6kshkdzHLE+ZUEVhpDi20AyacI4XkD5UmE9o2dCgWfJT6sv85v1WNNNY B46G/s00wVq5I/jk8rA1sjmi4EWo+CMRfeEBsvQmJX3yJJtmkMnzGqh/HSFfOls4I9T1Pj4+chy oPldTT+yXD4iFFQ6h5m951hEqqgE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHRSq4lX0ypiBn0qsF1yqk6HEVP/f0lyqB1WfIb/WUrrfAFfpX52Q26bH8w2UULWo++UZNQvg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:5247:b0:43b:c7f0:6173 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4406b218773mr91680465e9.4.1745244437127; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 07:07:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lumine.fritz.box (85-127-114-32.dsl.dynamic.surfer.at. [85.127.114.32]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-39efa4207fcsm12148597f8f.19.2025.04.21.07.07.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 21 Apr 2025 07:07:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <46fed1958a6c563e0b2d5e02b2a5e5514f423f15.camel@HIDDEN> Subject: Deliberation period for GCD 003 "Rename the default branch" has technically started From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> To: guix-devel@HIDDEN, info-guix@HIDDEN Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 16:07:14 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.54.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Guix, as the date for the GCD 003 was set to February 18th, the discussion period actually ended on Saturday already. I have incorporated some changes on Sunday to realign the proposal with GCD 002 (the Codeberg one), but barring any emergency changes there, GCD 003 is now to be considered final. As outlined in GCD 001, please respond to this mail with one of the following: - =E2=80=9CI support=E2=80=9D, meaning that you support the proposal; - =E2=80=9CI accept=E2=80=9D, meaning that you consent to the implementatio= n of the proposal; - =E2=80=9CI disapprove=E2=80=9D, meaning that you oppose the implementatio= n of the proposal. To count my own vote, I support the change of the default branch name to =E2=80=9Cmain=E2=80=9D. Cheers
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Mar 2025 21:40:54 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 26 17:40:54 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44652 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1txYUY-0000s2-Bl for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 17:40:54 -0400 Received: from wolfsden.cz ([37.205.8.62]:39894) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <~@wolfsden.cz>) id 1txYUU-0000rf-Rh for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 17:40:52 -0400 Received: by wolfsden.cz (Postfix, from userid 104) id C07BE393006; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 21:40:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=wolfsden.cz; s=mail; t=1743025248; bh=S2vAuz1QEvMgu11IRNZhi/usK3Rk2EnAEd1JbiuxgCo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=R5AgJL/XJU1hstLyYuIMxso09sZqC0yuKZSRMaoNZ4pD+FYhfa9IieLYpwgu4I5hV 3FwdiXODl9BB/Hnp45SCkfE6/KIGoLjz4FG3gq0Lk47kfS+L9Dw/D7ejL8AckMflGs tfkf3/cosRhPM450nCryiPysU+1Oa2tkt7F0tqhXRt0aKIzqT8PwHvl3esbVCk3Y+5 vPRmfVfGZuSwrBwxClAu+QKkYinwZ+a0QI68ZwCCalDV0W2zmop2VfhGJz7N25G5eu m2y0PYRju5rbtMWqJPFXoRWk2q6Q5Sw9CJGNgaUYJv0HqlfDe3S4eoRCHABkvilP+O 8hcNYgAiGsdnpr+MVTsxvkDvsAOSj4+Ig6JCZsvKGoPhtXg8Jm9dYPqQ+/ugYYkIdo 9WM2iolKkHddIXyr48oBnyLSfMZ0x/NAdZIduoYOp3uFwvVhwuSsCPWWpkw7HgZ5i4 ZpJ4OQSMYTMMCSKhI/dOBj+18D6iWVGq1Yu38kIUfb5KO5D2NRXREFu5nig2reUAt5 VflN2tbTDCAyBAaGmOn52bFgk2juWvgQ24G1DOvn01Ktw80Hp8fPbbOOCbN6bVf7cI RGV9j3b6FZzAd9I1Cbca/9HekOR1DAh9qKTqNzlbis1uFYlQJqXdNNHMCQP2wZIdbK GyNVF9wu+TldTGQyTlHmg4vQ= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on wolfsden X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from localhost (unknown [128.0.188.242]) by wolfsden.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E6E20392C1A; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 21:40:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=wolfsden.cz; s=mail; t=1743025248; bh=S2vAuz1QEvMgu11IRNZhi/usK3Rk2EnAEd1JbiuxgCo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=R5AgJL/XJU1hstLyYuIMxso09sZqC0yuKZSRMaoNZ4pD+FYhfa9IieLYpwgu4I5hV 3FwdiXODl9BB/Hnp45SCkfE6/KIGoLjz4FG3gq0Lk47kfS+L9Dw/D7ejL8AckMflGs tfkf3/cosRhPM450nCryiPysU+1Oa2tkt7F0tqhXRt0aKIzqT8PwHvl3esbVCk3Y+5 vPRmfVfGZuSwrBwxClAu+QKkYinwZ+a0QI68ZwCCalDV0W2zmop2VfhGJz7N25G5eu m2y0PYRju5rbtMWqJPFXoRWk2q6Q5Sw9CJGNgaUYJv0HqlfDe3S4eoRCHABkvilP+O 8hcNYgAiGsdnpr+MVTsxvkDvsAOSj4+Ig6JCZsvKGoPhtXg8Jm9dYPqQ+/ugYYkIdo 9WM2iolKkHddIXyr48oBnyLSfMZ0x/NAdZIduoYOp3uFwvVhwuSsCPWWpkw7HgZ5i4 ZpJ4OQSMYTMMCSKhI/dOBj+18D6iWVGq1Yu38kIUfb5KO5D2NRXREFu5nig2reUAt5 VflN2tbTDCAyBAaGmOn52bFgk2juWvgQ24G1DOvn01Ktw80Hp8fPbbOOCbN6bVf7cI RGV9j3b6FZzAd9I1Cbca/9HekOR1DAh9qKTqNzlbis1uFYlQJqXdNNHMCQP2wZIdbK GyNVF9wu+TldTGQyTlHmg4vQ= From: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename the default branch In-Reply-To: <2c8496df5bc3ad4746a5e4d5dc0bc578fc1ae273.camel@HIDDEN> (Liliana Marie Prikler's message of "Wed, 26 Mar 2025 22:00:09 +0100") References: <d2db73de82bb7bb3a6589a4299287d02dc961c14.camel@HIDDEN> <547c549d-970e-4331-8944-dc7a79698426@HIDDEN> <87wmcm2sqc.fsf@HIDDEN> <49ba31a6-6f1d-4607-9169-95b7dc557cfb@HIDDEN> <871puq8hd8.fsf@HIDDEN> <738287cd-601e-482c-8af0-903381e38f3b@HIDDEN> <2445d6dff0a8edb8c00b30111a967c02c4da0987.camel@HIDDEN> <8ecbe54e-f305-43ed-91c5-9f4608ac083a@HIDDEN> <87h63imzli.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z-GOoRwoYCX3q8of@HIDDEN> <Z-PxQbkdMMX3wGJC@jurong> <4db1e94f-f67d-4d94-801a-78bf66fd4755@HIDDEN> <2c8496df5bc3ad4746a5e4d5dc0bc578fc1ae273.camel@HIDDEN> Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 22:40:47 +0100 Message-ID: <87ldsr4gio.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN>, Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>, Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>, Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN>, Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>, Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> writes: >> There is a possible negative outcome, for example, that those who >> think that is unfair (maybe because they grew up watching missiles >> falling in their city) leave the project. We can agree or disagree, >> but that is a possibility and we should be empathetic enough to >> understand it and predict it the same way we try to predict the >> negative outcomes of our technical decisions. > Should we also predict that those who grew up watching missiles falling > in their city are at some point actually hit by said missiles? I mean, > there is a possible negative outcome wherein we discuss trivial matters > such as branch naming while the powers that be invest in arms to start > a third world war. Should we not be in the streets in this very > instant to stop our local governments from spending money on war > machines that would be much more direly needed in the education and > healthcare sectors? Military spending should increase, not decrease. I personally would prefer if more of those money stayed in Europe by spending them on weapons manufactured here, instead of paying the protection racket to the US (which, with Trump, looks increasingly like a bad deal). But given the Russian invasion and atrocities committed by them, Europe needs a strong, self-sufficient fighting force to act as an deterrent. And, as demonstrated in last ~30 years, it is *hard* to have that force by spending less than 2% of GDP. So, to answer your question, no, I do not think we should be in the streets with the goal of forcing *our* governments to spend less on tools needed for our defense. Tomas -- There are only two hard things in Computer Science: cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Mar 2025 21:26:20 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 26 17:26:20 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44598 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1txYGR-00084N-6H
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 17:26:19 -0400
Received: from dane.soverin.net ([2a10:de80:1:4092:b9e9:2295:0:1]:34253)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ekaitz@HIDDEN>) id 1txYGN-00083w-Sv
for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 17:26:17 -0400
Received: from smtp.soverin.net (c04smtp-lb01.int.sover.in [10.10.4.74])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
(No client certificate requested)
by dane.soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ZNKbP6dMnzygM;
Wed, 26 Mar 2025 21:26:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.soverin.net (smtp.soverin.net [10.10.4.100]) by
soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4ZNKbP1F85zPt;
Wed, 26 Mar 2025 21:26:09 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: smtp.soverin.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key;
unprotected) header.d=elenq.tech header.i=@elenq.tech header.a=rsa-sha256
header.s=soverin1 header.b=nqR7P2Hs; dkim-atps=neutral
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=elenq.tech; s=soverin1;
t=1743024369;
h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt;
bh=ObxOopOXx5O4ynZivwNXU+UYSwd/DGDlS48DkVo4HCQ=;
b=nqR7P2HsVPtn949DT/J/3z40k5Ls+NYU+RD3BW/YFQyIAhiHX4m+9Qf/O6E9T/S+PJjOc6
tU9/zoc8N5lHOkOGNbhUIkx2turDV0TgJzWr33iHnjJhHqPjk1KzXT3ZL6WTFnG6RiZl6V
VIjtPhDTZOqpOiVuXTB5b9L9JF5iBk22+WPvHeovUpGCGfiDuUx1aJH3dS+c9L1gtrD7LV
0t5ZHpNkNO4ZhpLk4IZwOplsOp11perpfGGnDhhPi1WXFpB4+tScyqwZDu9EoHLoHKao+B
3/SiP1OcNicH0/r8nEAwqqWx3rUVzZxShEBdMSZ0PTyQ2Avcmkp1biscar/86g==
X-CM-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=UsCZN/wB c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=67e470f1
a=GfXQuWAYjYMZp4ahSyumlQ==:117 a=GfXQuWAYjYMZp4ahSyumlQ==:17
a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=MKtGQD3n3ToA:10 a=1oJP67jkp3AA:10
a=UgyV6E8431QAVCiSDMkA:9 a=3ZKOabzyN94A:10 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10
a=yPy0HX4kI4LsAlP3oO-2:22
X-CM-Envelope: MS4xfFBGS5Y0w5G0McqmaVgKsVIDlqEO3vcu1YT3FxBZ7MfC5CyLjFRo5pou9vaSr3fhz4qS75BVDb2K5y1MS3Y8lXrUI02UryjxBjwQulmQ53Nc5Tm3ddDq
rn2PXUs1EteV2WpKuO2KkGzvSmt5EAOltI12sQT0niLenJxhaEg5ZvPJMvFrlOAJEn7Pg1k7DRzOMSfAypfgV7zzux+Oyr27COvB4oJ/otWZWhMulURrSIvn
GifNNyDrx6lfUamyIENXcz3T0CvdPSmu6anC2i6PqjWJ2OkihB9B4F7RKoh3Uc38EGR7IkukNlBf5gCqukveMU7H+uu31HXmmdlinixXopgpvljjWudvVS6S
LAjt54ra1B6b7c738AdHRPoTONjneg==
Message-ID: <1d607661-a864-47fa-9e9f-b4501cd7b339@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 22:26:08 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename the default branch
To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>,
Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>, Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
References: <d2db73de82bb7bb3a6589a4299287d02dc961c14.camel@HIDDEN>
<547c549d-970e-4331-8944-dc7a79698426@HIDDEN> <87wmcm2sqc.fsf@HIDDEN>
<49ba31a6-6f1d-4607-9169-95b7dc557cfb@HIDDEN> <871puq8hd8.fsf@HIDDEN>
<738287cd-601e-482c-8af0-903381e38f3b@HIDDEN>
<2445d6dff0a8edb8c00b30111a967c02c4da0987.camel@HIDDEN>
<8ecbe54e-f305-43ed-91c5-9f4608ac083a@HIDDEN> <87h63imzli.fsf@HIDDEN>
<Z-GOoRwoYCX3q8of@HIDDEN> <Z-PxQbkdMMX3wGJC@jurong>
<4db1e94f-f67d-4d94-801a-78bf66fd4755@HIDDEN>
<2c8496df5bc3ad4746a5e4d5dc0bc578fc1ae273.camel@HIDDEN>
Content-Language: en-US, es-ES, eu
From: Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN>
Autocrypt: addr=ekaitz@HIDDEN; keydata=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==
In-Reply-To: <2c8496df5bc3ad4746a5e4d5dc0bc578fc1ae273.camel@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spampanel-Class: ham
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407
Cc: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>,
=?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8?= =?UTF-8?Q?s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>,
76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN>,
Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
Hi,
On 2025-03-26 22:00, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, dem 26.03.2025 um 18:06 +0100 schrieb Ekaitz Zarraga:
>> In any case, it's not our association what we are considering but the
>> association a possible minority (which I argue that it may not exist)
>> may have (which I argue it may be fabricated by the fact some people
>> decided the word "master" was offensive).
> Can we move past arguments that deny the existence of people? I think
> that discussion was already had five years ago and we do not need to
> rehash it.
I'm going just to ignore this.
>> But this is something I wanted to highlight, that I think we are kind
>> of avoiding discussing. It's not that it is forced upon us only, it's
>> that we should, in my opinion, prevent that from happening because
>> Guix is of all people, including those that are "cultural enemies" of
>> the USA (because of their own reasons or because the cultural context
>> where they had the chance to be raised in). And they are already
>> doing a huge effort to be here, an effort US Americans don't need to
>> do.
>>
>> I'd rather make software for the majority of the world, than only for
>> those that feel comfortable with the US American eccentricities.
>>
>> This includes *people* in Iran, Russia, North Korea, China (just for
>> mentioning some) and the rest of the globe.
> So, in your opinion, is using a branch name other than master something
> that precludes people from Iran, Russia, the DPRK or China from
> contributing, or would this only be the case if we chose a name that is
> particularly hostile – either directly or by accident – to those
> people. Continuing, if we had a sizable community of e.g. Chinese
> people telling us that using this or that sinophobic term as branch
> name is a bad idea, should we not honour those as well?
No.
I said we should be very aware of what kind of worldview we impose in
our project.
And the main point that I've been trying to make is that a Chinese
person is way less likely to propose such a change because of their culture.
> Now, I am personally not aware that any of the current suggestions are
> sinophobic or discriminatory w.r.t. any other ethnicity, religion,
> etc., but I am willing to be corrected on that.
>
>> The name of the branch is the color of the bikeshed, I agree with you
>> all. I'd prefer if the discussion wasn't put in the terms of "which
>> of the colors of the US American flag do we want to use to paint it".
> So, the US flag is composed of *checks notes* a desire to avoid racist
> and sexist rhetoric? Well, that colours me surprised.
>
>> Being clear, changing the branch name to please US American
>> sensibility may be counterproductive, those that might feel
>> underrepresented in Guix (and probably in (free-) software
>> development) might see how we lean towards a worldview that is too
>> far from theirs. No surprise that some countries use their own
>> software ecosystem. I don't like to work only for less than a quarter
>> of the planet. I think people from any place in the world deserves
>> this work, and those who we are trying to please are the ones that
>> need it the less.
> Can I get 1 USD the next time you insinuate that this proposal exists
> solely to placate the interests of people in the US? I also accept
> euros if need be.
I'm not insinuating it. I'm saying it. USA and those places that adopted
their culture.
> Now there might be a nugget of truth within this paragraph in that
> there is a risk to inadvertently choose a branch name that alienates a
> particular group of people. If you feel that this is not sufficiently
> discussed as a drawback to the proposal, then perhaps I concede that
> such wording ought to be added.
That's not what I'm saying.
I don't care about the new name we choose. Is the act of changing names
that might be uncomfortable to many.
It is to me. I don't think words are this important.
And please don't answer me I don't understand because I am privileged.
> Other than that, I do think it is understood based on our CoC that we
> should not choose such a name in the first place and such names should
> not be up for debate. In fact, the section on the choice of a name
> opens up with the goal to find a name that "Guix contributors, as a
> whole, feel comfortable with".
>
> Perhaps it was a bit naïve of me to assume a name exists that all of us
> can actually get behind. It appears as though some people will feel
> uncomfortable with anything but master for the mere reason that people
> dared questioning "master". I can't help but feel like all this talk
> about US imperialism this, US imperialism that is to waste time and
> effort that could otherwise be spent towards effecting positive change.
> I know I am not reviewing any patches as I type out this reply.
>
Our argument is a waste of time?
It's you who wanted to discuss this (nah, you didn't, you just wanted to
apply it), it's several people telling you this is related with US
American world view (I count 3 already). Real people.
>> This I wanted to point out when I proposed putting the Palestinian
>> flag in the Guix website. I'm sure that I didn't make people think as
>> much as I expected to, because this conversation was more
>> confrontational than anything. But please think about it again. We
>> cannot pretend that a discussion like that one would be only positive
>> for the project, like I think this GCD does.
> This is not at all how I read your proposal towards putting flags on
> websites. In fact, it didn't even look like a proposal.
That's the point. Your GCD, as it is worded, is not a proposal.
I proposed that as a thought exercise.
>> There is a possible negative outcome, for example, that those who
>> think that is unfair (maybe because they grew up watching missiles
>> falling in their city) leave the project. We can agree or disagree,
>> but that is a possibility and we should be empathetic enough to
>> understand it and predict it the same way we try to predict the
>> negative outcomes of our technical decisions.
> Should we also predict that those who grew up watching missiles falling
> in their city are at some point actually hit by said missiles? I mean,
> there is a possible negative outcome wherein we discuss trivial matters
> such as branch naming while the powers that be invest in arms to start
> a third world war. Should we not be in the streets in this very
> instant to stop our local governments from spending money on war
> machines that would be much more direly needed in the education and
> healthcare sectors?
It's really hard to discuss with you, Liliana.
That has nothing to do with what I said.
You are trying to make a change that has a huge political and religious
background, if you don't understand that it might have social drawbacks
maybe you are not the right person to propose this kind of change.
You have been taking all my arguments literally and distorting them to
the extreme. I'm trying to give you some context. I'm not great at it.
But you are not helping at all.
>> And if you wish, strictly speaking on the document. It describes
>> potential social benefits using heavy loaded words ("harmful",
>> "racist", "sexist") but it doesn't list any social drawback. That's
>> more than enough to understand how biased the proposal is (it's just
>> so obvious!)
> I do have a small drawbacks section containing loaded words such as
> "evolve", "future", "satisfaction", and "opinion". Oh, and "obvious".
Come on.
>> I don't know if Simon's question "are we really looking for consensus
>> here?" was pointed to me, but I've been trying to. Maybe poorly,
>> addressing the core issues of the proposal, and saying, probably we
>> shouldn't have even started it.
> Simon already pointed out (in reply to Andreas) how Codeberg et al.
> advise "main" as the default branch for new projects and how projects
> currently appear to be using "main" a lot as a result.
>
> If anything about the framing of the GCD is wrong, it's that we are not
> the vanguard – we are in fact lagging behind.
>
> Cheers
In the vanguard of what?
It's a very spanish thing to tell your kids "If the other kids jump of a
cliff, do you jump too?"
Again, you are doing the same thing you have been doing since the
beginning, trying to counter what I say point by point, taking literally
a couple of words of the picture I'm trying to paint.
It is clear to me that we are not compatible at all, as it was already
from previous interaction.
Consider me done.
This is just nonsense. This is not a conversation.
Bye.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Mar 2025 21:01:01 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 26 17:01:01 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44559 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1txXrw-0006Lb-Ft
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 17:01:01 -0400
Received: from mail-wm1-x343.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::343]:56675)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>)
id 1txXrF-0006E5-Vs
for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 17:00:18 -0400
Received: by mail-wm1-x343.google.com with SMTP id
5b1f17b1804b1-43948021a45so3017495e9.1
for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 14:00:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1743022811; x=1743627611; darn=debbugs.gnu.org;
h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references
:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to:cc:subject
:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=ok9fxszSjIBxXaauAkYe6Hf2WZkKYJ5SSgenYR4M0E0=;
b=lHOlmmtUOE1AgiCLLMzhYeRKyqvLZ3tlfDTcdPwWXYlO7+ib+EdEW8XqXrA3UR+gr3
M0QOY/xC3mV3vcnJRTkNxySkySHr5xMOhUh1f0GW4a6uzLp/ph1Ca7jaWJHnzb/4YPuI
oRggei2Jw4q/tdvJeXqbzPNwgX9NlV6gZtP7MWcfHLJweBkcezqRl5urJjTiKO959Akj
DDqEPHWVcBFJkYgF7qond+AiS3jYlZ8YZwgNC70NpB1NyR2Qd5+YhkwMY6XgiiJppH+6
nWLOAOFMFREa6VmE3BOn5dEBaM+qPaG5rik2BGMM8qcXRoja4JU2E0qIMLeJeClHhM42
VmCw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1743022811; x=1743627611;
h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references
:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-message-state
:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=ok9fxszSjIBxXaauAkYe6Hf2WZkKYJ5SSgenYR4M0E0=;
b=libR3AWyW/T0/0R7kKC5hEd3dbw/8F54sV09CyllFWRFZFrEKdJzPTEqjWENjhzcyN
w1Ld8qo/BAbH43Rh6fk7bnadTlJYJQFk63ztjO6hkTDQgFKhR+FdGR1DB2E/pAQKpQWC
vwWl4RBt4lQVmJjPr4MxEd6LnnqjOlqkr65b8YSxnZJO2/p0KS2rz4ZtfM+3G1uWqqMt
WxSc+4H+HudZ2Hv8HdIE34xxoI7gmi8XGx34IWKr3pTMak4KcIgv7PWsJ4VFlPQ8ZhJZ
GfqAVJZlwDNQH2gqGH9MtR2Z0UVXke3eIsIthjKp80rNSzBC9UwuDj9gMbJSaNOcqaEv
y+jw==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1;
AJvYcCV9wMmUqXCbLg9ILeWUFZLBhue8A6ZAxgYxNiaehyCiuhZ76nwnsN31MW+0ueYpUGr02Nt0XA==@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YycunhA3qKkRT9csgOsuZnETbuKaQMdEGKY4qLlU9jZ2Cew25eo
zaAOafa4C+TDfQlG7fyfkMsJwxZxdxri8HOFojoNIoxtwK6lUlgZ
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvqS4dneecOiq56pNW7cwQ2zGdT9CmSiTmgNs+htbQm2UqPl2sy0eClNbPDtyu
18XTvIqQj/f72mTWv1F/OuklqWJlHbrmzOIrbacke3p0k7zkheiMQq1f2y69j5LtsvkO/mnw4FM
Mj0CIhxK/9mjuLrf9/hd3krN/pV+71lMD99sR/T+GMbKUEJEfZK/4RDHvVWjkQ7BQeFOj7KzCmx
zqrc/VGjXA0LtpPThZvznu6+Wf5ZkB0yLAV0KC8kH4DBe9hJB70viuTLkbwMxCkQW9zqF8a1P9f
nJwTdjUfFaSvxFTCEbi9Dmldj7joWDUNVlJnvKKLqCx14+O7MjNs6FX2VeNcBQcmnXk6pNG71Kn
4TW3mnV+B7CSyOhfkcwEO
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFVOhfaVWtXzEGyKcErHcAS9HLYxDnU1V93es4DOAmiMxRJ/OO7VOW0w3iuGcXQr1wswjqJug==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1c28:b0:43d:2230:300f with SMTP id
5b1f17b1804b1-43d84e67696mr11068345e9.0.1743022810915;
Wed, 26 Mar 2025 14:00:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lumine.fritz.box (85-127-114-32.dsl.dynamic.surfer.at.
[85.127.114.32]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
5b1f17b1804b1-43d82dede98sm14142655e9.6.2025.03.26.14.00.09
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
Wed, 26 Mar 2025 14:00:10 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <2c8496df5bc3ad4746a5e4d5dc0bc578fc1ae273.camel@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename the default branch
From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>
To: Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN>, Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>, Leo
Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 22:00:09 +0100
In-Reply-To: <4db1e94f-f67d-4d94-801a-78bf66fd4755@HIDDEN>
References: <d2db73de82bb7bb3a6589a4299287d02dc961c14.camel@HIDDEN>
<547c549d-970e-4331-8944-dc7a79698426@HIDDEN>
<87wmcm2sqc.fsf@HIDDEN>
<49ba31a6-6f1d-4607-9169-95b7dc557cfb@HIDDEN>
<871puq8hd8.fsf@HIDDEN>
<738287cd-601e-482c-8af0-903381e38f3b@HIDDEN>
<2445d6dff0a8edb8c00b30111a967c02c4da0987.camel@HIDDEN>
<8ecbe54e-f305-43ed-91c5-9f4608ac083a@HIDDEN>
<87h63imzli.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z-GOoRwoYCX3q8of@HIDDEN>
<Z-PxQbkdMMX3wGJC@jurong> <4db1e94f-f67d-4d94-801a-78bf66fd4755@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.54.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407
Cc: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>,
Ludovic =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>, 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN>, Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
Am Mittwoch, dem 26.03.2025 um 18:06 +0100 schrieb Ekaitz Zarraga:
> In any case, it's not our association what we are considering but the
> association a possible minority (which I argue that it may not exist)
> may have (which I argue it may be fabricated by the fact some people=20
> decided the word "master" was offensive).
Can we move past arguments that deny the existence of people? I think
that discussion was already had five years ago and we do not need to
rehash it.
> But this is something I wanted to highlight, that I think we are kind
> of avoiding discussing. It's not that it is forced upon us only, it's
> that we should, in my opinion, prevent that from happening because
> Guix is of all people, including those that are "cultural enemies" of
> the USA (because of their own reasons or because the cultural context
> where they had the chance to be raised in). And they are already
> doing a huge effort to be here, an effort US Americans don't need to
> do.
>=20
> I'd rather make software for the majority of the world, than only for
> those that feel comfortable with the US American eccentricities.
>=20
> This includes *people* in Iran, Russia, North Korea, China (just for=20
> mentioning some) and the rest of the globe.
So, in your opinion, is using a branch name other than master something
that precludes people from Iran, Russia, the DPRK or China from
contributing, or would this only be the case if we chose a name that is
particularly hostile =E2=80=93 either directly or by accident =E2=80=93 to =
those
people. Continuing, if we had a sizable community of e.g. Chinese
people telling us that using this or that sinophobic term as branch
name is a bad idea, should we not honour those as well?
Now, I am personally not aware that any of the current suggestions are
sinophobic or discriminatory w.r.t. any other ethnicity, religion,
etc., but I am willing to be corrected on that.
> The name of the branch is the color of the bikeshed, I agree with you
> all. I'd prefer if the discussion wasn't put in the terms of "which
> of the colors of the US American flag do we want to use to paint it".
So, the US flag is composed of *checks notes* a desire to avoid racist
and sexist rhetoric? Well, that colours me surprised.
> Being clear, changing the branch name to please US American
> sensibility may be counterproductive, those that might feel
> underrepresented in Guix (and probably in (free-) software
> development) might see how we lean towards a worldview that is too
> far from theirs. No surprise that some countries use their own
> software ecosystem. I don't like to work only for less than a quarter
> of the planet. I think people from any place in the world deserves
> this work, and those who we are trying to please are the ones that
> need it the less.
Can I get 1 USD the next time you insinuate that this proposal exists
solely to placate the interests of people in the US? I also accept
euros if need be.
Now there might be a nugget of truth within this paragraph in that
there is a risk to inadvertently choose a branch name that alienates a
particular group of people. If you feel that this is not sufficiently
discussed as a drawback to the proposal, then perhaps I concede that
such wording ought to be added. =C2=A0
Other than that, I do think it is understood based on our CoC that we
should not choose such a name in the first place and such names should
not be up for debate. =C2=A0In fact, the section on the choice of a name
opens up with the goal to find a name that "Guix contributors, as a
whole, feel comfortable with".
Perhaps it was a bit na=C3=AFve of me to assume a name exists that all of u=
s
can actually get behind. It appears as though some people will feel
uncomfortable with anything but master for the mere reason that people
dared questioning "master". I can't help but feel like all this talk
about US imperialism this, US imperialism that is to waste time and
effort that could otherwise be spent towards effecting positive change.
I know I am not reviewing any patches as I type out this reply.
> This I wanted to point out when I proposed putting the Palestinian
> flag in the Guix website. I'm sure that I didn't make people think as
> much as I expected to, because this conversation was more
> confrontational than anything. But please think about it again. We
> cannot pretend that a discussion like that one would be only positive
> for the project, like I think this GCD does.=C2=A0
This is not at all how I read your proposal towards putting flags on
websites. In fact, it didn't even look like a proposal.
> There is a possible negative outcome, for example, that those who
> think that is unfair (maybe because they grew up watching missiles
> falling in their city) leave the project. We can agree or disagree,
> but that is a possibility and we should be empathetic enough to
> understand it and predict it the same way we try to predict the
> negative outcomes of our technical decisions.
Should we also predict that those who grew up watching missiles falling
in their city are at some point actually hit by said missiles? I mean,
there is a possible negative outcome wherein we discuss trivial matters
such as branch naming while the powers that be invest in arms to start
a third world war. Should we not be in the streets in this very
instant to stop our local governments from spending money on war
machines that would be much more direly needed in the education and
healthcare sectors?
> And if you wish, strictly speaking on the document. It describes=20
> potential social benefits using heavy loaded words ("harmful",
> "racist", "sexist") but it doesn't list any social drawback. That's
> more than enough to understand how biased the proposal is (it's just
> so obvious!)=20
I do have a small drawbacks section containing loaded words such as
"evolve", "future", "satisfaction", and "opinion". Oh, and "obvious".
> I don't know if Simon's question "are we really looking for consensus
> here?" was pointed to me, but I've been trying to. Maybe poorly,=20
> addressing the core issues of the proposal, and saying, probably we=20
> shouldn't have even started it.
Simon already pointed out (in reply to Andreas) how Codeberg et al.
advise "main" as the default branch for new projects and how projects
currently appear to be using "main" a lot as a result.
If anything about the framing of the GCD is wrong, it's that we are not
the vanguard =E2=80=93 we are in fact lagging behind.=20
Cheers
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Mar 2025 20:20:53 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 26 16:20:53 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44505 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1txXF6-0003cw-DQ
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 16:20:53 -0400
Received: from mail-wm1-x32e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::32e]:46512)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>)
id 1txXF2-0003cZ-8q
for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 16:20:49 -0400
Received: by mail-wm1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id
5b1f17b1804b1-43bb6b0b898so2729815e9.1
for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 13:20:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1743020442; x=1743625242; darn=debbugs.gnu.org;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references
:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
:reply-to; bh=ahH15auCQKgUgjCiZ6F4wBD9CGP3NWndyKw3Hl7K0uI=;
b=Ob5J+of6k4GEsHroqpnM1e/IkjXCo9VGJIOi80Y9KO2t3Y2Ms0FVfk/JnboMPKB2xr
sm9ibf/2sEQ9LEK8KeIAug+V8j0vcABKaAzZt+g7TiIFZptzsE84oUiQvtwTHP99ewGn
4/5q32M2S0r9iWrSBJ4fQB/haENEkcuI5bAbAYHndBRr7/5+Zj/uvkeA+cSZz5jkNVRJ
LO7mzdVyrd6oHob7SeBcdT+Kzuyi/CMacPuXCDAoey7+Ui8szEshbJEto+/7USoXHadH
wjkFLCSYDXDGWX1VmqUblFE1M8HTZnbOe0rqjGA79jApK7u5Ylt22xW7jdZB0qec5QKC
iWxQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1743020442; x=1743625242;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references
:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=ahH15auCQKgUgjCiZ6F4wBD9CGP3NWndyKw3Hl7K0uI=;
b=ttrb3UFyF7yFx7P4yK1l8fviKRKZxgvPpUyOGpf56r/QtujF8Av2Drhaa6MjaVtbkn
aQv9VQQPa5N/t0vI/7HS26sh+WTRSnxdEnDoJLzQ+nul1l6qIUx9XPfubc1jiwXxt48Q
dKgE+eOWF/WugYokShGDfkpDYnkz37W19ma+N5RJdbMt9DAiyd/7EoBsEglKpxQwUg+2
3dQZAhy/Lgjwmp6Tp/TcHk93Vb86GU0nWqcLJuuk6M0oTzVYM4oX4xDkaiJg2jUupOci
D17NwyOVxqo708/wrT0JkvcaRMV2+A/Dz7zJ6YvNBnMh5blKhuSjdxVeU3saLq/YdiEL
A6kw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzUrpU++Ha9ad5Wtns8lpD1F1ARtIlU0iUj3r2HBZugN7nAtlj8
HluwduYDNflgMysqg2OrQXA0pxHL9VeEkYE5oPS3drofuVSWTMLA
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuY2VUvyjhvzFJPEU7tby05y7GTT3zhyw5VVY2jlnN9sjl/k1xIwZHngdQEyIH
vTwdo2WV7jcnx5xqnpXZwocie70k/h2OXL38HOJDAJSi3CiEIwylGUKaK2b9JAwyEo1zUzOSESi
1KqoOPwwZF2ZnDR+GXjlMy/atZ7e9xuGOMenrFXHmZg7gEvM89s2fo29y6VAx5h7fcR/2WbjHwH
UFstZgkozsk/EEfF/QTKAbM6JiEQKXuTDqHN/mbTfMGfqEmJ1E+b6peHlXjxdD1yUQEz9p763/6
lbrJIxBkpmrSkyYBgphfN5UxDB3ZWX1Godywl8d4i2kahBhnFzkyqHxNIzmOI9DWcOTiHIgB/Vy
qMqfdEq4KxXFpLFeMgkRdNqXpdcRxqhfW2zf/LT7n
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFiKib+RboSiwGHth9EqKt5jfkixIQIkaF4SG+vKFytSFFqbV2VSA/CVAKMnmjjB6kYR4eLuw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:63c3:b0:43d:40b0:5b with SMTP id
5b1f17b1804b1-43d86af28b5mr545075e9.25.1743020441442;
Wed, 26 Mar 2025 13:20:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lili (roam-nat-fw-prg-194-254-61-42.net.univ-paris-diderot.fr.
[194.254.61.42]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
5b1f17b1804b1-43d82f1bc29sm13069975e9.27.2025.03.26.13.20.40
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
Wed, 26 Mar 2025 13:20:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
To: Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN>, Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>, Leo
Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
Subject: About consensus, again (was Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename the
default branch)
In-Reply-To: <4db1e94f-f67d-4d94-801a-78bf66fd4755@HIDDEN>
References: <d2db73de82bb7bb3a6589a4299287d02dc961c14.camel@HIDDEN>
<547c549d-970e-4331-8944-dc7a79698426@HIDDEN>
<87wmcm2sqc.fsf@HIDDEN>
<49ba31a6-6f1d-4607-9169-95b7dc557cfb@HIDDEN>
<871puq8hd8.fsf@HIDDEN>
<738287cd-601e-482c-8af0-903381e38f3b@HIDDEN>
<2445d6dff0a8edb8c00b30111a967c02c4da0987.camel@HIDDEN>
<8ecbe54e-f305-43ed-91c5-9f4608ac083a@HIDDEN>
<87h63imzli.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z-GOoRwoYCX3q8of@HIDDEN>
<Z-PxQbkdMMX3wGJC@jurong>
<4db1e94f-f67d-4d94-801a-78bf66fd4755@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 21:20:36 +0100
Message-ID: <871pujtugb.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407
Cc: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>, Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>,
76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN>,
Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
Hi Ekaitz, all,
On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 at 18:06, Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN> wrote:
> I don't know if Simon's question "are we really looking for consensus=20
> here?" was pointed to me, but I've been trying to. Maybe poorly,=20
> addressing the core issues of the proposal, and saying, probably we=20
> shouldn't have even started it.
Not specifically to you, Ekaitz; specifically to you, all. :-)
Still, I am not convinced we are trying to build something together.
For example, you, Ekaitz wrote in the message I reply:
And if you wish, strictly speaking on the document. It describes=20
potential social benefits using heavy loaded words ("harmful", "rac=
ist",=20
"sexist") but it doesn't list any social drawback. That's more than=
=20
enough to understand how biased the proposal is (it's just so obvio=
us!)=20
and how difficult that is to argue against. The belligerence this h=
as=20
been defended with doesn't help much to try to understand the answe=
rs it=20
got.
And this is the typical anti-pattern =E2=80=93 IMHO =E2=80=93 How to not bu=
ild together
a consensus. This is confrontational, again IHMO. For instance,
Ekaitz, compare this frame or one of [1] and the first question below.
FWIW, my views about how consensus works is to friendly ask about
specific wording and propose alternatives. It=E2=80=99s not to have a judg=
ement
or express a dismissive opinion.
Then, it=E2=80=99s because we are specific on the document itself that we c=
an
build something together =E2=80=93 as we do with regular patches. By asking
specifically on the document itself, it=E2=80=99s possible to friendly point
something that might appear useless or poorly worded, and maybe the GCD
itself might become weak or pointless. Well, as we do with regular
patches, no? Else all is doomed before we even try.
IIUC, the master problem is about these two sections:
# Summary
Currently, much of Guix's development takes place on the =E2=80=9Cm=
aster=E2=80=9D
branch. This name is neither particularly meaningful nor inclusive;
choosing to use it may inadvertently alienate potential contributor=
s.
To mitigate these effects, we should more clearly communicate, what=
the
default branch is all about.
# Motivation
It is well known, that Git works with whatever branch name one choo=
ses.
However, for historical reasons, the default/initial/main branch for
development used to be =E2=80=9Cmaster=E2=80=9D =E2=80=94 particula=
rly in 2012, when the first
commit to Guix was made.
Recent versions of Git support arbitrary initial branches and the
default branch name is subject to change upstream, at least in part
because the current default =E2=80=94 =E2=80=9Cmaster=E2=80=9D =E2=
=80=94 may be perceived as harmful.
While the intended meaning is something close to =E2=80=9Can origin=
al, from
which copies are made=E2=80=9D, there are several other meanings of=
the word
that spring to mind more easily, some of have a racist or sexist
connotation.
One goal of the Guix community is to foster a healthy community aro=
und
the software we use. Using clear language that does not pertain to
harmful stereotypes is a key towards achieving this goal. Thus, as=
a
proactive step, we should rename the default branch.
Therefore, being active and engaging would mean:
+ Can we rewrite the Motivation section? Because people have Master
degree and the diploma=E2=80=99s not yet renamed, to my knowledge. Is the
words master really harmful, racist or sexist?
+ About the Motivation, why not narrow the scope and focus on some
aspects: quoting [1] =C2=AB a) most users leave unchanged the Git default
"main", therefore "master" will become increasingly uncommon and
unexpected, b) the choice of "main" is masterfully similar when
tab-completing or looking through a sorted list of refs, and c) the
move to Codeberg presents a hopefully rare opportunity combine
disruptive changes =C2=BB
+ The Motivation appears to me poorly written because I=E2=80=99ve never he=
ard
that the term master would be harmful or racist or sexist. Do we have
references for backing this claim?
Etc.
Bah after a frank but friendly discussion, if the Motivation appears
empty, then it answers by itself, no?
Why do people need to drag in the discussion =E2=80=93 in no specific order=
=E2=80=93: my
Black friends, personal history with slavery or dictatorship, opinions
on US imperialism, Gaza massacre, English language, Ukrainian war, a
quote of Frantz Fanon, etc.
Do not take me wrong, I see the gift to have people with different
backgrounds on board, and I celebrate because people do not fear to
generously share what they think. Even, I=E2=80=99m never the last to
cross-pollinate^W -battle ideas or learn about what other people think.
However, let be honest, this dragging, is it really helpful to build
something together?
Build a consensus implies a self-discipline when approaching the
discussion. It=E2=80=99s about patience and stay on the document itself. =
I let
you all to judge who drifted or framed it out of the scope.
Somehow, I=E2=80=99m very disappointed about not being able to build togeth=
er.
Bah I=E2=80=99m still confident about Decision Making via consensus, even on
such bikeshedding topic! Well, I=E2=80=99m confident because I=E2=80=99m s=
ure we will
all learn about this GCD and so reset to friendly questions on the
document itself when approaching the Discussion Period.
Anyway, I=E2=80=99m done with this GCD.
Bye.
simon
1: Re: [GCD] Rename =E2=80=9Cmain=E2=80=9D branch
Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN>
Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:57:35 +0100
id:c2532d09-e54b-49fe-9ace-dca55239f394@HIDDEN
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2025-02
https://yhetil.org/guix/c2532d09-e54b-49fe-9ace-dca55239f394@HIDDEN
2: [bug#76407] [GCD] A better name for the default branch
Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN>
Fri, 28 Feb 2025 10:46:05 -0500
id:CA+3U0ZmnhHSbd=3DsKRYVhYDJ+c4AJZBos91GKMwSAm7OEQ4Wmkg@HIDDEN
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/76407
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/msgid/CA+3U0ZmnhHSbd=3DsKRYVhYDJ+c4AJZBos91GKMw=
SAm7OEQ4Wmkg@HIDDEN
https://yhetil.org/guix/CA+3U0ZmnhHSbd=3DsKRYVhYDJ+c4AJZBos91GKMwSAm7OEQ4Wm=
kg@HIDDEN
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Mar 2025 17:06:49 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 26 13:06:49 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44182 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1txUDI-0001Iv-Ln
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 13:06:49 -0400
Received: from dane.soverin.net ([185.233.34.21]:34345)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ekaitz@HIDDEN>) id 1txUDF-0001Id-2j
for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 13:06:46 -0400
Received: from smtp.soverin.net (c04smtp-lb01.int.sover.in [10.10.4.74])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
(No client certificate requested)
by dane.soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ZNCqy5C2qz6G;
Wed, 26 Mar 2025 17:06:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.soverin.net (smtp.soverin.net [10.10.4.99]) by soverin.net
(Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4ZNCqx6RR8z1j;
Wed, 26 Mar 2025 17:06:37 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: smtp.soverin.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key;
unprotected) header.d=elenq.tech header.i=@elenq.tech header.a=rsa-sha256
header.s=soverin1 header.b=asaRafRX; dkim-atps=neutral
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=elenq.tech; s=soverin1;
t=1743008798;
h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt;
bh=yE/31ls9hPsk1v+N1dUZrbWoZLRLKkbARmRUj1Y9i+0=;
b=asaRafRX+J8mdCqYU84YYo79u0imvtsEe/EA4DKswiyZoKvwN7K7MMOYB4Y8zUwCxGCb3q
VBVv2BNxkBsshzKhuccUXQ35gFHmscB7ubGNfY/MJdPAJNqmCXuMdQ4Qu5nh3X/IFCp7br
yMA2TSedjTHhdUkKn+A2Ti1fstnc+tG8HHKT1Btn4yGZB+aE6Z4QqFYziU+xT/YETgzTJQ
AbcrcAgEWgBSY6KpfleV6pi+OjFat6n3wEBF6CusbgB+sfO/KcW89lrTI3nKsqQcHoq6OX
K0iipCdd8fYEToQTncJT61bLg8M0Js0bYoJsMy/OoXzJ8wN3qI57QNEpcThhMQ==
X-CM-Envelope: MS4xfFfueMVktOvXW83KLwozBta6PhrlpqbicLxsSopk0356kT3grzuOAMup/KQovIjmNyEGD77Za42VphQcYrwc2B832gpv94vNJa7kdGVVbuF5yf+iL0b1
IdLKkJjLhXrotdSxAtOzt7iZtSv0VW9UjgMAAtXHejLgW7e/lDW3EynylsCnibLY/+kIZUdiY2ARHf7bVJ0T3WfKop38ChUrnWWkIc+NcAhU729YmznSh0Ih
LApeycag5gpSAuryQUWMpqyL4FEpKMGHNZxM3nx9TioLlCpH0MGXokVNaiuocXLKCB7O8o+a0xiETu/oWC5RjBrRRloWUs8nqQofwqHL2hrkxRikH0G6ZZhL
PkkyySL1W5RkmD77107GpNwjWqVlMg==
X-CM-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=d/oPyQjE c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=67e4341e
a=GfXQuWAYjYMZp4ahSyumlQ==:117 a=GfXQuWAYjYMZp4ahSyumlQ==:17
a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=MKtGQD3n3ToA:10 a=1oJP67jkp3AA:10
a=YFUR9hapnMfkAcU_wyYA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=yPy0HX4kI4LsAlP3oO-2:22
Message-ID: <4db1e94f-f67d-4d94-801a-78bf66fd4755@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 18:06:37 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename the default branch
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>, Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
References: <d2db73de82bb7bb3a6589a4299287d02dc961c14.camel@HIDDEN>
<547c549d-970e-4331-8944-dc7a79698426@HIDDEN> <87wmcm2sqc.fsf@HIDDEN>
<49ba31a6-6f1d-4607-9169-95b7dc557cfb@HIDDEN> <871puq8hd8.fsf@HIDDEN>
<738287cd-601e-482c-8af0-903381e38f3b@HIDDEN>
<2445d6dff0a8edb8c00b30111a967c02c4da0987.camel@HIDDEN>
<8ecbe54e-f305-43ed-91c5-9f4608ac083a@HIDDEN> <87h63imzli.fsf@HIDDEN>
<Z-GOoRwoYCX3q8of@HIDDEN> <Z-PxQbkdMMX3wGJC@jurong>
Content-Language: en-US, es-ES, eu
From: Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN>
Autocrypt: addr=ekaitz@HIDDEN; keydata=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==
In-Reply-To: <Z-PxQbkdMMX3wGJC@jurong>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spampanel-Class: ham
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407
Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>,
Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>,
Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN>,
=?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8?= =?UTF-8?Q?s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)
First of all Andreas, thanks for your thoughtful message.
It seems like you pretty much agree with what I shared, including the
association you make with the name master ("maestro" for me, which could
be a teacher, or a person that excels in something, but also the first
original-essential work you use for others (production molds, pillars in
buildings and so on).
In any case, it's not our association what we are considering but the
association a possible minority (which I argue that it may not exist)
may have (which I argue it may be fabricated by the fact some people
decided the word "master" was offensive).
Btw, the other day I was informed that the University of Southern
California's School of Social Work removed the "field" work from their
curriculum because it may have racist connotations related to slavery. I
think the "master" case is the same. The only difference is "master"
looks more like a natural change because we have too many voices telling
us it is.
On 2025-03-26 13:21, Andreas Enge wrote:
> The negative connotations of the word "master" seem to come only from a
> US American viewpoint from the word pair "master"/"slave"; so from my
> point of view, we are importing a US American culture war, by which I do
> not feel concerned, into our international project.
> Ekaitz writes: "the USA imperialism is forced upon me."
> Even before reading his words, I essentially felt the same. Maybe we
> could call it "US American cultural dominance" to be a bit more neutral.
> We are already expected to communicate in English (while I may regret
> that Latin has gone out of fashion, I must admit that English is just
> the most practical solution right now). We are expected to use
> US American spelling. Now we consider pandering to US American
> sensitivities with respect to their history on how we name our branches.
> (As far as I understand, the author of the proposal is not from the USA,
> but this does not invalidate the argument about cultural dominance.)
> All this is somewhat ironic: We start by using a language that is foreign
> to many or probably even most of us, and end up being expected to share
> also the cultural connotations linked to that language (in a particular
> part of the world) that would not pose a problem if we had used a
> different language from the start.
But this is something I wanted to highlight, that I think we are kind of
avoiding discussing. It's not that it is forced upon us only, it's that
we should, in my opinion, prevent that from happening because Guix is of
all people, including those that are "cultural enemies" of the USA
(because of their own reasons or because the cultural context where they
had the chance to be raised in). And they are already doing a huge
effort to be here, an effort US Americans don't need to do.
I'd rather make software for the majority of the world, than only for
those that feel comfortable with the US American eccentricities.
This includes *people* in Iran, Russia, North Korea, China (just for
mentioning some) and the rest of the globe. The world is too large, and
it's crowded.
If we want to make *people* (not just *some* people) feel comfortable,
we should take a look to the broad picture and stop looking at our own
belly button (spanish idiom :) ).
The name of the branch is the color of the bikeshed, I agree with you
all. I'd prefer if the discussion wasn't put in the terms of "which of
the colors of the US American flag do we want to use to paint it".
Because if there's no possibility to discuss the very core of this
proposition, that's how it sounds to me, and I'm not particularly a
hater of the USA. I cannot even imagine how could this all sound to others.
Being clear, changing the branch name to please US American sensibility
may be counterproductive, those that might feel underrepresented in Guix
(and probably in (free-) software development) might see how we lean
towards a worldview that is too far from theirs. No surprise that some
countries use their own software ecosystem. I don't like to work only
for less than a quarter of the planet. I think people from any place in
the world deserves this work, and those who we are trying to please are
the ones that need it the less.
This I wanted to point out when I proposed putting the Palestinian flag
in the Guix website. I'm sure that I didn't make people think as much as
I expected to, because this conversation was more confrontational than
anything. But please think about it again. We cannot pretend that a
discussion like that one would be only positive for the project, like I
think this GCD does. There is a possible negative outcome, for example,
that those who think that is unfair (maybe because they grew up watching
missiles falling in their city) leave the project. We can agree or
disagree, but that is a possibility and we should be empathetic enough
to understand it and predict it the same way we try to predict the
negative outcomes of our technical decisions.
I think my previous messages were understood as I was opposing the
change just because I'm a free-speech absolutist (heh) or an
anti-"woke". It's not the change what I oppose, I reject its terms, and
the premises it is proposed on top of, which I think are simply
counterproductive in a way that is not even contemplated in the document.
And if you wish, strictly speaking on the document. It describes
potential social benefits using heavy loaded words ("harmful", "racist",
"sexist") but it doesn't list any social drawback. That's more than
enough to understand how biased the proposal is (it's just so obvious!)
and how difficult that is to argue against. The belligerence this has
been defended with doesn't help much to try to understand the answers it
got.
I could say mea culpa a for my part, maybe my wording wasn't the best,
but I don't think my previous arguments were really listened to, simply
because the rename *is the right thing to do*.
I don't know if Simon's question "are we really looking for consensus
here?" was pointed to me, but I've been trying to. Maybe poorly,
addressing the core issues of the proposal, and saying, probably we
shouldn't have even started it.
I hope this speaks more clearly about what I said before.
Best,
Ekaitz
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Mar 2025 16:07:40 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 26 12:07:40 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44018 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1txTI3-0006nO-Mn for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 12:07:39 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x344.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::344]:43048) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>) id 1txTI1-0006n9-Ot for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 12:07:38 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-x344.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-43cf680d351so6873835e9.0 for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 09:07:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1743005251; x=1743610051; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ogpYwL0a4IQBLH9RMWyzB/i8beUpQZn0/1AnJd6CuCo=; b=ICmwAwM3slT0hF9BEqT1DpyIrmkyzbHgIgsiRJIOgU7+nAEliG119+M8oMOLangzJG +tHZhPzJAs8JPomSNDAUOy3O5ZQkI2j2jDnEid7ZbR3zosnc7GHkVVk7vZw2LQx5yLqy 2YyXEAThDnoVS1aMUfXzyWA9108vVcKj//F1u21Nvar70tB+gABeEIU4b8i/VKFyFSrI o5c5z5aXOCHXTAr2DlXQWpXl0921YKoQVGGGlgw36ysQmu3d0YM2BvgPScAxAvl/8R4p ClLw4ybo/F8KIVblEzSVH/rEDbKJ2+W++T155cGs3io1zfj3CWN0z/m4HDu740H2nPvr 68sA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1743005251; x=1743610051; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ogpYwL0a4IQBLH9RMWyzB/i8beUpQZn0/1AnJd6CuCo=; b=eDRnNcEyDNIMq7iKp7CTUKqK+bDirsv91pN2SCy6bzXgsjGNaK46b4b1NfvU+3ZCfE JLVOq/fEGrhKDJO+IMcBq9VbkSw+xDSZDIVjgCrjvVyf/Z9C+ptPFy7q9x60GF7TiMAW 7dgA6ymlD4H0Y4BfI5O1wHdZ7F+ACnqfTgfCiQSffRl5HAgT5YNVJd+Ev20E2SZ//qgB zDGmdMpkBv07570Vu+6QP3J00GET/JQ4/X1uuBmeEFHr+zbKuqBDKOQJxMeeE3L5rnQ4 tZUh9qzeoUX2w5EgZJZqDqYIASExtd/eHpY6QCFgWRrIi7UBHW9uBXY8QdEjxrPfeYvP 9x2Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YySxDEPO1mK3+FzT4gd7gzf6bpIZ7Ogd9y2jd6UF5V3SAXHSjRx /d+CctULu6me9e2WCjrtUMXIF5Aneo/sQ0TVD7+jeYnnN+fvku4v X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsWsVshUUJJ7ihqTgrBinmPjmFFX+X5W7ELwVtBwYQ7ylSH7NiYlmxf9Yyd5g6 H3S6/uCwkHz5KYv8DMBzB57gu01Pmy7NtvyJBHxGEI6fZFxfFZj+46ax88yppVWNnbftenv6cS0 fEP0OhdBd+cwyq0OPvzN0lDopvoy93SH/Kko9IETUd/+LgU6WSs5ingJ7sak8jmy6t5F+P2noks iimvtt573wP2zE7MdYzxAREyFI9sIu6cbri+MZQjVz4vB2pijXxLRYiESjgW2jK6g76XeyJUPFR dnTAx2razeq4AyYORjVIuXTjL7hcHW3XmLfdIi1KzvyvruzJj6FecC+QIN8YtCFD8Jv0UJF37jB 3/TL8cL1MA0og9q5vObbp+DFe1TtUQfI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHSjXVTh9P0EYjsxY9oWu3auupwYaTYjfS7ldOVUkrZBFdQJdHPvklx91VO7B0pR7xCRzsqXQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:64a9:0:b0:39a:c6d1:c343 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-39acc44f0aemr3440865f8f.10.1743005250792; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 09:07:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lumine.fritz.box (85-127-114-32.dsl.dynamic.surfer.at. [85.127.114.32]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-43d830f5708sm6751755e9.32.2025.03.26.09.07.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 26 Mar 2025 09:07:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1cca5f33082da0871f224f45c32a2771630972a5.camel@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename the default branch From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> To: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>, Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>, Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 17:07:29 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87v7rvu9a1.fsf@HIDDEN> References: <d2db73de82bb7bb3a6589a4299287d02dc961c14.camel@HIDDEN> <547c549d-970e-4331-8944-dc7a79698426@HIDDEN> <87wmcm2sqc.fsf@HIDDEN> <49ba31a6-6f1d-4607-9169-95b7dc557cfb@HIDDEN> <871puq8hd8.fsf@HIDDEN> <738287cd-601e-482c-8af0-903381e38f3b@HIDDEN> <2445d6dff0a8edb8c00b30111a967c02c4da0987.camel@HIDDEN> <8ecbe54e-f305-43ed-91c5-9f4608ac083a@HIDDEN> <87h63imzli.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z-GOoRwoYCX3q8of@HIDDEN> <Z-PxQbkdMMX3wGJC@jurong> <87v7rvu9a1.fsf@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.54.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>, Ludovic =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>, 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN>, Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Am Mittwoch, dem 26.03.2025 um 16:00 +0100 schrieb Simon Tournier: > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Yeah, a branch named caput because it=E2=80=99s always= kaputt. :-D caput for core-updates 2026 :)
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Mar 2025 15:57:06 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 26 11:57:06 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43988 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1txT7p-0006HZ-UG for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 11:57:06 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x441.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::441]:54373) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>) id 1txT7n-0006H2-Cg for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 11:57:03 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-x441.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-39133f709f5so3783534f8f.0 for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 08:57:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1743004617; x=1743609417; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=JNPDdlrY/Jy2rpotD5vNSHmJjwzsdGQsxsMpMWI/EcY=; b=ICj7vwyAdjSRzRuumVxhsSWU1GVKI8sXsTn+XeRGUNYWNafp257JpC+QTkmAx/EfJp h19TMPQw9/T/1/fdUN8nI6jhGi1z+SsVmt0to+ypClJNtOD8dz2a9A3oKJD0DZ/EM4la 6CVqmGH09CAMtjJyiaV10yjH15jKaPAyrz9Q27ABtQItGKYt+xrwc3PBixVX5ZdMswkU UqBKBdjo+QOeyPJ1hzEAk3gslwnbJfkt+b6wwZeFGWJQdwgqNYL8L+fWsCPgOuBxxFfm WKFSvreRIkDPFRN/8xGsjq9G0n3qe3OxI9TFqU6XTEJ1rsn37sp3aDNJjCG5NoiCqyFA asdQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1743004617; x=1743609417; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=JNPDdlrY/Jy2rpotD5vNSHmJjwzsdGQsxsMpMWI/EcY=; b=EQMRVPyV1gNIXDNaZSIKr9SNRPSaIfQ3Vn5NsrlPM6pUD799O5TnTMgZOPlBzINU2u 2pE4g8XjmYn+xdeU7OArbHTvXlr1LL1vgJ8COyc4QbtT1af5WUNWy7CQ+AxxDxWQdC3a IqATplL21I1K+jQ2QBW/H7lWuBfS1yNw8tuDZ33aVAl1cmwbV0IbkslHMaJ1WlFeKwro QKzJyWPiAlgs5a9CGYmQdZUdiNk3H900kxyrSNrU5X+Q8TgfEUdaWdIfOpOxujJaWR7q /gOIMpNy4M2OjaHLgg+eSyFQFDgsZgfiymTRneLa9vncodhrt2IwkEftdccEYE2Qzj/v yrmQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCW7yZkj/Cc6lAdh8iVV38Eq5qqMZexj468LMCdo98jmW2/9mklGds0LgkkLOxqCAEQTNK3A5g==@debbugs.gnu.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx6z9qvIi9ijTR+A9/hOu0wvBm9pkdPqvbZC0dzmvLzDHuOwUoL 6CZCm/fFXkjujwJuBOknDxDXUUO+mXCVmvanBI8uVQ7rHSSJsAGa X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctQr9Qo/+9na1MwibxckMkYXy5hkI5t0jUyYN0mbYZi/RAswktbE7KpIDbYHoi Hc7xn7r1AWbm+txTbkqV0hLFWg5Dr5xAWzsDwWTNkBNr1mCWttXfON+S7cv/HGwgC7g+HpItLIG sJBiOIKG5ITh32mwsbZZX45zHLwAgrawuOUeMS2r0yAZzYRyhUPG85gcLdahokt81l8S0MWqIVO 07exafOtIGL4XM2lSusgBYDW5quCtw9NATHNZn26eXoUaGAvw9Q3/fEfWhHdkBYOL9XHVMiS5zl kj6bNCD0RqrBXu1J4K+TsjZJL1jmzDYHQJbFoKBhvx8SRxnoTw6+5d5RykOE4Nfvri94XFZjWoN cGgP36WS8L+IMhVjtm1dY X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHjaIYG2ZPsmMUJ46NKxNcbm57jllTQeaLtmEx1LYWxFwBfs+ejHre9zvlHUAj6h0avkhHb3g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:184e:b0:39a:c6c1:3408 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-39ac6c13529mr7171071f8f.37.1743004616850; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 08:56:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lumine.fritz.box (85-127-114-32.dsl.dynamic.surfer.at. [85.127.114.32]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-43d84632ffcsm2653015e9.31.2025.03.26.08.56.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 26 Mar 2025 08:56:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <545307019a80ab0d8e12d1fc81faa37e9d16d2ac.camel@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename the default branch From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> To: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN> Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 16:56:55 +0100 In-Reply-To: <Z-QOz1hD971mXq4O@jurong> References: <87wmcm2sqc.fsf@HIDDEN> <49ba31a6-6f1d-4607-9169-95b7dc557cfb@HIDDEN> <871puq8hd8.fsf@HIDDEN> <738287cd-601e-482c-8af0-903381e38f3b@HIDDEN> <2445d6dff0a8edb8c00b30111a967c02c4da0987.camel@HIDDEN> <8ecbe54e-f305-43ed-91c5-9f4608ac083a@HIDDEN> <87h63imzli.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z-GOoRwoYCX3q8of@HIDDEN> <Z-PxQbkdMMX3wGJC@jurong> <97420cd84fbcf27e84888e0c5331f042a29114ea.camel@HIDDEN> <Z-QOz1hD971mXq4O@jurong> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.54.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN>, Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>, Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>, Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN>, Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>, Ludovic =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Am Mittwoch, dem 26.03.2025 um 15:27 +0100 schrieb Andreas Enge: > Sorry, I do not know well enough how "guix pull" works to really > elaborate. And I am not sure what you mean by "master points towards > main". Assume we change the default branch; then as a committer I > will push to "main", and "master" is one commit behind. I do not > think that it is possible in git to have "master" just be an alias > for "main"? (Or maybe it is on codeberg?) Then we would have to > manually or automatically let master follow main; by running a script > as a git hook doing the equivalent of > =C2=A0=C2=A0 "git checkout master; git rebase origin/main; git push" > (beware of recursive "git push" hooks...)? Git does support symbolic references =E2=80=93 someone else already wrote a= bout those. Other than that, it'd probably be periodic runs of=C2=A0 git push origin main:master i.e. push the current main to master. We would need to prevent inadvertent pushes to master, though. > (Hm, this is a bit twisted, but it would be perfectly possible to > have a local branch main that follows origin/master or vice versa, > right? So locally each of us could use their own favourite > terminology.) Yes, that is possible. We are merely talking here about the remote view and the Guix tooling associated with it. > The first time one does a "guix pull", I think it amounts to a "git > clone", so whatever the default branch is at this time will be used. > Supposedly the next "guix pull" just does the equivalent of "git > pull", so if I am on master (and master is not updated to follow main > after every commit) I will not get the update. > Probably if master is simply deleted, I will get an error message, > and could then be invited to delete $HOME/.cache/guix/checkouts? That > would be okay in my opinion. I think you wouldn't even have to do that, because `guix pull' supports branches, so the pulled branch would simply switch from master to main. > But as said, I am convinced the technical details can be worked out, > but this requires to know exactly how "guix pull" works (which is > probably your case). >=20 > > > So maybe we should name the principal branch "caput" or > > > "=CE=BA=CE=B5=CF=86=CE=AC=CE=BB=CE=B1=CE=B9=CE=BF". > > Maybe "head", alluding to "HEAD"?=C2=A0 "caput" sadly has the meaning > > "broken" if we pronounce it German ;)=20 >=20 > Well, I sort of liked the self-deprecating pun here :) >=20 > But this was only in the bike shedding part about what we feel with > respect to the change; as said before, in reality I would oppose > anything but "master" or "main". I do not think anybody has a real > problem with "main", and then it is simply a matter of practicality > to switch to the second most used branch name instead of our own > invention. Fair enough. Cheers
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Mar 2025 15:49:19 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 26 11:49:18 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43958 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1txT0I-0005s2-Fg for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 11:49:18 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:54202) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <gabrielsantosdesouza@HIDDEN>) id 1txT09-0005qs-1o for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 11:49:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <gabrielsantosdesouza@HIDDEN>) id 1txT01-0000jk-GN for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 11:49:01 -0400 Received: from layka.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <gabrielsantosdesouza@HIDDEN>) id 1txSzy-0007dv-M7; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 11:49:01 -0400 Received: from mail01.disroot.lan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E32125EB5; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 16:48:57 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org Received: from layka.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8I7R9rjdavJz; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 16:48:52 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1743004132; bh=r7AJkKQeU5jrox9LkeWp2RwIsXrXCw52M2DeGXFSAmw=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=ARjpUQ6l0Aq6mQWxYAb2rPuF+IzWrKKjwEqDlMsKk+NoXcePYKpqbCFf7MGM0wywa 2MXxPXxzbH7qW2GCcjrFhPaEaTv2bciHszNM7/Tt240OcoivM8b6wllyqKtUzJ4nJK 3vLbFzzOZLoddkV55yw/V9g0ONLch+NeDZd3qvxfJ+BlIj5MzkwP55iQr3wIMUnhrF Cjnas/wwMwstT5XtyKyoFI0WhshC6wqS1scIA2enc4dFHqyn3+bceZGSDmWMgjci9k 6Ik7h3y9xnS+ilzVpVjz+biWltxijpsHgpV9uDPSzuFePz8i4hByEcMcVcxLNKT/g6 sX16h6J9H6oHw== Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 12:48:45 -0300 From: Gabriel Santos <gabrielsantosdesouza@HIDDEN> To: guix-patches@HIDDEN, Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename the default branch User-Agent: Thunderbird for Android In-Reply-To: <Z-QOz1hD971mXq4O@jurong> References: <87wmcm2sqc.fsf@HIDDEN> <49ba31a6-6f1d-4607-9169-95b7dc557cfb@HIDDEN> <871puq8hd8.fsf@HIDDEN> <738287cd-601e-482c-8af0-903381e38f3b@HIDDEN> <2445d6dff0a8edb8c00b30111a967c02c4da0987.camel@HIDDEN> <8ecbe54e-f305-43ed-91c5-9f4608ac083a@HIDDEN> <87h63imzli.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z-GOoRwoYCX3q8of@HIDDEN> <Z-PxQbkdMMX3wGJC@jurong> <97420cd84fbcf27e84888e0c5331f042a29114ea.camel@HIDDEN> <Z-QOz1hD971mXq4O@jurong> Message-ID: <7DB7B054-4117-4D94-A74D-C6B925E0F020@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=178.21.23.139; envelope-from=gabrielsantosdesouza@HIDDEN; helo=layka.disroot.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN>, Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>, Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>, Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN>, Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ludovic_Court=E8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) Em 26 de mar=C3=A7o de 2025 11:27:27 BRT, Andreas Enge <andreas@enge=2Efr> = escreveu: >[I]n reality I would oppose anything but "master" or "main"=2E Oh, nevermind my previous comment on "trunk" then=2E I'll read up on this GCD later to see if I have anyrhing to add to this conversation=2E --=20 Gabriel Santos
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Mar 2025 15:49:00 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 26 11:49:00 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43951 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1txT00-0005qa-4G for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 11:49:00 -0400 Received: from layka.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:51838) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <gabrielsantosdesouza@HIDDEN>) id 1txSzy-0005qS-2T for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 11:48:58 -0400 Received: from mail01.disroot.lan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E32125EB5; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 16:48:57 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org Received: from layka.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8I7R9rjdavJz; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 16:48:52 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1743004132; bh=r7AJkKQeU5jrox9LkeWp2RwIsXrXCw52M2DeGXFSAmw=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=ARjpUQ6l0Aq6mQWxYAb2rPuF+IzWrKKjwEqDlMsKk+NoXcePYKpqbCFf7MGM0wywa 2MXxPXxzbH7qW2GCcjrFhPaEaTv2bciHszNM7/Tt240OcoivM8b6wllyqKtUzJ4nJK 3vLbFzzOZLoddkV55yw/V9g0ONLch+NeDZd3qvxfJ+BlIj5MzkwP55iQr3wIMUnhrF Cjnas/wwMwstT5XtyKyoFI0WhshC6wqS1scIA2enc4dFHqyn3+bceZGSDmWMgjci9k 6Ik7h3y9xnS+ilzVpVjz+biWltxijpsHgpV9uDPSzuFePz8i4hByEcMcVcxLNKT/g6 sX16h6J9H6oHw== Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 12:48:45 -0300 From: Gabriel Santos <gabrielsantosdesouza@HIDDEN> To: guix-patches@HIDDEN, Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename the default branch User-Agent: Thunderbird for Android In-Reply-To: <Z-QOz1hD971mXq4O@jurong> References: <87wmcm2sqc.fsf@HIDDEN> <49ba31a6-6f1d-4607-9169-95b7dc557cfb@HIDDEN> <871puq8hd8.fsf@HIDDEN> <738287cd-601e-482c-8af0-903381e38f3b@HIDDEN> <2445d6dff0a8edb8c00b30111a967c02c4da0987.camel@HIDDEN> <8ecbe54e-f305-43ed-91c5-9f4608ac083a@HIDDEN> <87h63imzli.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z-GOoRwoYCX3q8of@HIDDEN> <Z-PxQbkdMMX3wGJC@jurong> <97420cd84fbcf27e84888e0c5331f042a29114ea.camel@HIDDEN> <Z-QOz1hD971mXq4O@jurong> Message-ID: <7DB7B054-4117-4D94-A74D-C6B925E0F020@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN>, Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>, Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>, Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN>, Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ludovic_Court=E8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Em 26 de mar=C3=A7o de 2025 11:27:27 BRT, Andreas Enge <andreas@enge=2Efr> = escreveu: >[I]n reality I would oppose anything but "master" or "main"=2E Oh, nevermind my previous comment on "trunk" then=2E I'll read up on this GCD later to see if I have anyrhing to add to this conversation=2E --=20 Gabriel Santos
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Mar 2025 15:48:15 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 26 11:48:15 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43946 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1txSzG-0005pQ-Ok
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 11:48:15 -0400
Received: from mail-wm1-x332.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::332]:54714)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>)
id 1txSyx-0005o2-PE
for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 11:47:58 -0400
Received: by mail-wm1-x332.google.com with SMTP id
5b1f17b1804b1-43d07ca6a80so35839545e9.1
for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 08:47:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1743004070; x=1743608870; darn=debbugs.gnu.org;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references
:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
:reply-to; bh=dgHvIdU+QvyzG88btlBWEN93j62/6XW7MNahcoogvtM=;
b=B00/pF1HUYsUsxORcmbQcdi7dXP4NoRLEksLUUj9EgD4OM4vsJ5/Bm0dc1nhZqcVna
M/oAS5DZRUDQMomuazhgGOPY75+hrT1Im9zhLcjWKXRf/6ieGNK2nwRDYxpfkLv4g/oy
wVPkYUdHMFEB9OmHD93xFjlah+uTpFJ7rbkksVHZVlaoZRiHCK5daUIWYfALIDOSxbDB
P8sgqcgYw8KIzMBUo2xtwLKTKZuIIOBXo/BuLggTYGr2rzqwKwhseQYnBKlz500biw2q
S1kb8IeQ0ZizEGaT+NXkGagSgx2OEiaFO/ieCHF+d8OuYQdNhJF0XCC4J/hEY059FV6Z
Xp0Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1743004070; x=1743608870;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references
:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=dgHvIdU+QvyzG88btlBWEN93j62/6XW7MNahcoogvtM=;
b=spJ5eS0+B1rODRMdmm+e4D0TgeRXvb3AJ9gGlh1kqWcT/grjeMTCsPybN2PD85LhIz
cIVL6DUAax9lLUXpLHP1cldyQlvAbhsbn9aA6gEHalvojiArAouwp2NHHCRBjKJ4FJpO
7HDlyTGmdOCA9nwhN4X5M56sUj4aEeJmTkplrpUUToE2uqBgmKQu9UXMmwjtnX9QpILE
wBxGyJf2gB2U/fqWa4+tnZDOQ418NBzkowe/XaxUQlKXm7r6YKYVmr/KI6rGmWh9suMM
LQLAso9eS2Bvusnyag6kLPb43Z/kR2bMYokYbY6JTnf5I+18vMlJCOJ8UZvV0xklK/LR
Y5PA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyM1SnLUxPUsCRbhHksVWkmiy8x/FQIR9uQJnqewLq6DEkJlvoO
Fh4GtHGZS1t8ubeTZk9LSylAiSlDl0xQrkCBo+SG8CCBDdli5AoLhsat8A==
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncs09XzV5dQePgTQWro04UNcz60EZAEbPsXMs612Vfzh440j/j3zoO+OQuGnS0o
7R5lya26MN0vFtX4GOCkdD3k4I+qLXwFLWo5yvssEpSXm1XBMUPXsYEMTB0CUxa/b8gXQjQieao
g1KjETkiTqY+RPo9KDNY54v88Op3srSP0yNuktpsLdBfwFaFdLBAg4txxdZJDqsz/xuvHOhg6p7
U1niPJsd/ezxb85mUlwfaiSqNXf4fYt0AQ57RObEvoSboPTB3/xSJZ27e4IGIvvBd7tQ0p6kZCS
AyGTPuiPDyqTlyS0yFhZ09i77tN2qNl6YMu3Sx568fQL7h80pLvJbCWi+fvB3GzVYpPFhHRLg8N
tw1ynrIOe7zFtC/UB7qFa4HNp29J92g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHp9jYGTdjZAFHew8ynppvr/wjMPP8+OMi3Qs+OW/nXzvkbRwzWAsP+82AbopKUlv1UGuT+/A==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4ed3:b0:43c:f85d:1245 with SMTP id
5b1f17b1804b1-43d509f8503mr231160735e9.17.1743004069434;
Wed, 26 Mar 2025 08:47:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lili (roam-nat-fw-prg-194-254-61-42.net.univ-paris-diderot.fr.
[194.254.61.42]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
5b1f17b1804b1-43d82f15585sm5836305e9.24.2025.03.26.08.47.48
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
Wed, 26 Mar 2025 08:47:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>, Liliana Marie Prikler
<liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename the default branch
In-Reply-To: <Z-QOz1hD971mXq4O@jurong>
References: <87wmcm2sqc.fsf@HIDDEN>
<49ba31a6-6f1d-4607-9169-95b7dc557cfb@HIDDEN>
<871puq8hd8.fsf@HIDDEN>
<738287cd-601e-482c-8af0-903381e38f3b@HIDDEN>
<2445d6dff0a8edb8c00b30111a967c02c4da0987.camel@HIDDEN>
<8ecbe54e-f305-43ed-91c5-9f4608ac083a@HIDDEN>
<87h63imzli.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z-GOoRwoYCX3q8of@HIDDEN>
<Z-PxQbkdMMX3wGJC@jurong>
<97420cd84fbcf27e84888e0c5331f042a29114ea.camel@HIDDEN>
<Z-QOz1hD971mXq4O@jurong>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 16:47:41 +0100
Message-ID: <87pli3u736.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407
Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN>,
Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>, Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN>,
Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>,
Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
Hi Andreas,
On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 at 15:27, Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN> wrote:
> I do not think that it is possible in
> git to have "master" just be an alias for "main"?
Hum, it seems possible directly with Git: Make master point to main
$ git symbolic-ref refs/heads/master refs/heads/main=20
Well, Denis gave the tips [1]. It requires an access to Savannah itself
and I=E2=80=99m sure Savannah admins will process if we open a ticket. :-)
Do I miss something?
Cheers,
simon
1: Re: [GCD] Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg
Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@HIDDEN>
Wed, 19 Feb 2025 02:12:40 +0100
id:20250219021240.7ad429f1@primary_laptop
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2025-02
https://yhetil.org/guix/20250219021240.7ad429f1@primary_laptop
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Mar 2025 15:47:57 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 26 11:47:57 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43942 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1txSyz-0005oN-3f
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 11:47:57 -0400
Received: from mail-wm1-x32e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::32e]:46250)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>)
id 1txSyw-0005o0-TS
for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 11:47:55 -0400
Received: by mail-wm1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id
5b1f17b1804b1-4394a823036so45095e9.0
for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 08:47:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1743004069; x=1743608869; darn=debbugs.gnu.org;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references
:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
:reply-to; bh=OBO3hydwc31kVjNROokZn+1Swoz0JZRbNPt33MKzoAA=;
b=Soi6zd6RLGc59bu3+6hIVN06j9OC1HsCx84AeM4bEg6QiGSDzNfzWjI4Qg1R/oadl3
xkm7t8+y8bR2LILaoOUW7g7oQv57qSke1XHRMWCRbrMHAfzQdJeOwAq6sQVCwXKDtilB
qUWCz/4w+PJos8SuGypQI33J6/dRTVVoLSANbuDEpiDZyiFRUrJbZXOl9WqsRLtjOCNV
QU+d4/F7HIwpNSgLqd/EP1dsPqpPW2rYa90w2/V2m8Uijq8h9lvAmcJ0GIX5Yebsv7+/
dbCgYTGcbjR3+dzuyDHd2r7gooHJJzpnSE4gs9j3lxDHNBDHJUulbCzfvyk7Flz9gC2U
aL6w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1743004069; x=1743608869;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references
:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=OBO3hydwc31kVjNROokZn+1Swoz0JZRbNPt33MKzoAA=;
b=OATiA4mbxsXr1VsPLKFATCSr66VccAeuv1SepVdq+h1qkUu5vvThwIFnd6lwdKWrS1
R7y2eI60N3xwWzlpOMuf/0eJl0V+zDRoh4Pb4FJ626NhiVvZH39Rd/kVUkBtsTDXOT0U
41fH1Kus3mKKofStUfknWhyfT+IDLC/1ViZ03MpVtntkaMDD6KIYtG99vlcjFtBgtq3L
Gi2tguYOyy4s6Z7sRTJ54AvkZ1UdQneQRTpELVxmrMLs32CRl7wdQaLOidB8GeonGRJ0
lv0RlGPPZiG4UlmUrpNFykyef0ABAkBIRH5jZHF0bSgPqwLQKBmU45m6a7s9LZYFTjd9
PyoA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxVkZAq4Q7OERSwCvHunmxHwAUQ8xF3SglJKVUCfthFhN/TCybw
bCBIGSwwP0tzxJGHy2fZMzdphJuSPIZTVtkn4mblasIASa50e7fF
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncufT0X+sZxqv9CRotDd2nBf8u2Ig+SV3a7IkSveMLvwlbstdR2R+id+SzzVTWs
UiioYWJkTG2DuXs0fVZHk/hoytWJyE1yUylTPdmRV8Oz8YG7UDJZTM6ypeur1RequuwHopANrjH
hZqQSIcj6ue5r9tUS8Kkv/tlmDz52CQVrvKq2+AP0+l+B7aorDl5jQrJ5xfknD9b85S1vJzHC9s
RGYlKxX+LEXAcRgx+gyorOKiCx16brjN3Tfw8cPR2/svOfYy4TbKclYf5tZc/iLQFGV0FJoTz4Q
/IC3kfqCP18OsD6mu+Z4uVqhUwOFeS3NBD8x91ijliGh1ipT4VykQYSPJRD4Na9BdOJFlvJmd4Z
m9gIy4rYJupdEoSOkur0yNeT9BSELYA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF7o9QHevredxBPmO9hfkL0Ey2eJNZZEfl0NSzb/OfvJnfHJAeMAK7BHwHtlYoxwOpCWsM7MA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1548:b0:43c:f78d:82eb with SMTP id
5b1f17b1804b1-43d509f5985mr241474575e9.15.1743004068349;
Wed, 26 Mar 2025 08:47:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lili (roam-nat-fw-prg-194-254-61-42.net.univ-paris-diderot.fr.
[194.254.61.42]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
5b1f17b1804b1-43d82f7f9b6sm5753495e9.39.2025.03.26.08.47.47
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
Wed, 26 Mar 2025 08:47:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>, Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename the default branch
In-Reply-To: <Z-PxQbkdMMX3wGJC@jurong>
References: <d2db73de82bb7bb3a6589a4299287d02dc961c14.camel@HIDDEN>
<547c549d-970e-4331-8944-dc7a79698426@HIDDEN>
<87wmcm2sqc.fsf@HIDDEN>
<49ba31a6-6f1d-4607-9169-95b7dc557cfb@HIDDEN>
<871puq8hd8.fsf@HIDDEN>
<738287cd-601e-482c-8af0-903381e38f3b@HIDDEN>
<2445d6dff0a8edb8c00b30111a967c02c4da0987.camel@HIDDEN>
<8ecbe54e-f305-43ed-91c5-9f4608ac083a@HIDDEN>
<87h63imzli.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z-GOoRwoYCX3q8of@HIDDEN>
<Z-PxQbkdMMX3wGJC@jurong>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 16:00:22 +0100
Message-ID: <87v7rvu9a1.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407
Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN>,
Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>,
Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>,
Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN>, Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
Hi Andreas,
I share many of your points and for some others, I need to re-read with
my full attention. Here a quick comment on one specific point=E2=80=A6
On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 at 13:21, Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN> wrote:
> ractically speaking, we could also stick with
> "master" and wait and see whether "main" becomes the majority, and
> decide to switch only if and when that happens.
=E2=80=A6when creating a new repository, Codeberg advises:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
Creating a new repository on the command line
touch README.md
git init
git checkout -b main
git add README.md
git commit -m "first commit"
git remote add origin https://codeberg.org/zimoun/test.git
git push -u origin main
Pushing an existing repository from the command line
git remote add origin https://codeberg.org/zimoun/test.git
git push -u origin main
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
And Gitlab, Github, Bitbucket, etc. propose the same.
The initial announcement is from 2020 [1]. Well, already 5 years but I
have not found a list of projects (or examples) that switched. For
instance, FreeBSD uses main but they=E2=80=99ve probably started to use Git
after 2020. :-)
Well, I=E2=80=99ve just opened the Explore webpage [3] and browsed the first
page of repositories:
main IIIIIIIIII
master IIIII
forgejo I
linkita I
demo I
nixos I
v3 I
For sure, it=E2=80=99s highly biased. :-)
1: https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname/
2: https://codeberg.org/FreeBSD
3: https://codeberg.org/explore/repos
Cheers,
simon
PS:
> while I may regret
> that Latin has gone out of fashion
[=E2=80=A6]
> "=CE=BA=CE=B5=
=CF=86=CE=AC=CE=BB=CE=B1=CE=B9=CE=BF".
At the time when Latin was fashionable, people raised the exact same
argument about cultural dominance=E2=80=A6 so they proposed another good
ol=E2=80=99: =E1=BC=A1 =CE=BA=CE=BF=CE=B9=CE=BD=E1=BD=B4 =CE=B4=CE=B9=
=CE=AC=CE=BB=CE=B5=CE=BA=CF=84=CE=BF=CF=82 ! :-) But koine greek was also a=
t some point
culturally dominant, so people proposed classical =D7=A2=D6=B4=D7=91=D6=
=B0=D7=A8=D6=B4=D7=99=D7=AA=E2=80=8E. And so on.
Hum, yet another bootstrap problem. ;-)
Yeah, a branch named caput because it=E2=80=99s always kaputt. :-D
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Mar 2025 15:45:17 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 26 11:45:17 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43937 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1txSwO-0005ib-GQ
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 11:45:17 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:39224)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <gabrielsantosdesouza@HIDDEN>)
id 1txSwB-0005d1-Ik
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 11:45:03 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <gabrielsantosdesouza@HIDDEN>)
id 1txSw5-0000Go-Gv
for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 11:44:57 -0400
Received: from layka.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139])
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <gabrielsantosdesouza@HIDDEN>)
id 1txSw4-00079k-1w; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 11:44:57 -0400
Received: from mail01.disroot.lan (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2FF025F12;
Wed, 26 Mar 2025 16:44:52 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org
Received: from layka.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP
id ntwuY_yU3Du8; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 16:44:50 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail;
t=1743003890; bh=JjFWt7e3sT4FMKD5h+Gwtm0jF5jE3lP473gYc6ko2b8=;
h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To:References;
b=W/ll+puRMkMC+BmN+EkUuq/o6D7yuuFQ7MyBQQFrOzNYh4TVY80V8m+0yiuYLY4z0
eHpePpsAcigHG8Unk4vlGOargT2yQH0jN79/PisBhxETsHpyxhU7Owa0tVQYVsrkde
H8NmcR5Y/67Vw717YnTfB1CEQsxFJ+H+eDLbemZncasXewxwBe39hJLBcB16YG5tfl
hSkMk8kkmUYeOKDYCv1Y6YHn8bKHtGq02p3Rfcfrzj9C3xiqWPBIFc6/ndWsxOdbAZ
HN7a+436W/zT2JHsfN7jr6XmvUxpYzz362/2rubCCfGVdoazrEY95dmyGNnFzcluLg
UmVQYXmLLg8LQ==
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 12:44:43 -0300
From: Gabriel Santos <gabrielsantosdesouza@HIDDEN>
To: guix-patches@HIDDEN, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>,
Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>, Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename the default branch
User-Agent: Thunderbird for Android
In-Reply-To: <97420cd84fbcf27e84888e0c5331f042a29114ea.camel@HIDDEN>
References: <d2db73de82bb7bb3a6589a4299287d02dc961c14.camel@HIDDEN>
<547c549d-970e-4331-8944-dc7a79698426@HIDDEN> <87wmcm2sqc.fsf@HIDDEN>
<49ba31a6-6f1d-4607-9169-95b7dc557cfb@HIDDEN> <871puq8hd8.fsf@HIDDEN>
<738287cd-601e-482c-8af0-903381e38f3b@HIDDEN>
<2445d6dff0a8edb8c00b30111a967c02c4da0987.camel@HIDDEN>
<8ecbe54e-f305-43ed-91c5-9f4608ac083a@HIDDEN> <87h63imzli.fsf@HIDDEN>
<Z-GOoRwoYCX3q8of@HIDDEN> <Z-PxQbkdMMX3wGJC@jurong>
<97420cd84fbcf27e84888e0c5331f042a29114ea.camel@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <F62DAB2A-8013-48B3-A725-62157FDF591B@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=178.21.23.139;
envelope-from=gabrielsantosdesouza@HIDDEN; helo=layka.disroot.org
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001,
SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN>,
Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>,
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ludovic_Court=E8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>,
Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN>, Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/)
Em 26 de mar=C3=A7o de 2025 10:52:40 BRT, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana=2E=
prikler@gmail=2Ecom> escreveu:
>I'm pretty sure SVN users will remember trunk :)
I never used SVN, but I always appreciate whenever I
see "trunk", because of the Git tree analogy ("branches")=2E
--=20
Gabriel Santos
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Mar 2025 15:44:56 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 26 11:44:56 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43930 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1txSw4-0005cq-4Z
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 11:44:56 -0400
Received: from layka.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:36070)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <gabrielsantosdesouza@HIDDEN>)
id 1txSw2-0005cf-BF
for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 11:44:55 -0400
Received: from mail01.disroot.lan (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2FF025F12;
Wed, 26 Mar 2025 16:44:52 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org
Received: from layka.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP
id ntwuY_yU3Du8; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 16:44:50 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail;
t=1743003890; bh=JjFWt7e3sT4FMKD5h+Gwtm0jF5jE3lP473gYc6ko2b8=;
h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To:References;
b=W/ll+puRMkMC+BmN+EkUuq/o6D7yuuFQ7MyBQQFrOzNYh4TVY80V8m+0yiuYLY4z0
eHpePpsAcigHG8Unk4vlGOargT2yQH0jN79/PisBhxETsHpyxhU7Owa0tVQYVsrkde
H8NmcR5Y/67Vw717YnTfB1CEQsxFJ+H+eDLbemZncasXewxwBe39hJLBcB16YG5tfl
hSkMk8kkmUYeOKDYCv1Y6YHn8bKHtGq02p3Rfcfrzj9C3xiqWPBIFc6/ndWsxOdbAZ
HN7a+436W/zT2JHsfN7jr6XmvUxpYzz362/2rubCCfGVdoazrEY95dmyGNnFzcluLg
UmVQYXmLLg8LQ==
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 12:44:43 -0300
From: Gabriel Santos <gabrielsantosdesouza@HIDDEN>
To: guix-patches@HIDDEN, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>,
Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>, Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename the default branch
User-Agent: Thunderbird for Android
In-Reply-To: <97420cd84fbcf27e84888e0c5331f042a29114ea.camel@HIDDEN>
References: <d2db73de82bb7bb3a6589a4299287d02dc961c14.camel@HIDDEN>
<547c549d-970e-4331-8944-dc7a79698426@HIDDEN> <87wmcm2sqc.fsf@HIDDEN>
<49ba31a6-6f1d-4607-9169-95b7dc557cfb@HIDDEN> <871puq8hd8.fsf@HIDDEN>
<738287cd-601e-482c-8af0-903381e38f3b@HIDDEN>
<2445d6dff0a8edb8c00b30111a967c02c4da0987.camel@HIDDEN>
<8ecbe54e-f305-43ed-91c5-9f4608ac083a@HIDDEN> <87h63imzli.fsf@HIDDEN>
<Z-GOoRwoYCX3q8of@HIDDEN> <Z-PxQbkdMMX3wGJC@jurong>
<97420cd84fbcf27e84888e0c5331f042a29114ea.camel@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <F62DAB2A-8013-48B3-A725-62157FDF591B@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407
Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN>,
Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>,
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ludovic_Court=E8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>,
Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN>, Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
Em 26 de mar=C3=A7o de 2025 10:52:40 BRT, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana=2E=
prikler@gmail=2Ecom> escreveu:
>I'm pretty sure SVN users will remember trunk :)
I never used SVN, but I always appreciate whenever I
see "trunk", because of the Git tree analogy ("branches")=2E
--=20
Gabriel Santos
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Mar 2025 14:27:46 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 26 10:27:46 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43799 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1txRjN-0007Jo-D8 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 10:27:46 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:53446) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <andreas@HIDDEN>) id 1txRjJ-0007JY-Nr for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 10:27:42 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F439DDF; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 15:27:34 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: hera.aquilenet.fr; none X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavis at hera.aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id eeEK1ljhG17s; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 15:27:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from jurong (176-179-191-150.abo.bbox.fr [176.179.191.150]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2BD983B2; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 15:27:30 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 15:27:27 +0100 From: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN> To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename the default branch Message-ID: <Z-QOz1hD971mXq4O@jurong> References: <87wmcm2sqc.fsf@HIDDEN> <49ba31a6-6f1d-4607-9169-95b7dc557cfb@HIDDEN> <871puq8hd8.fsf@HIDDEN> <738287cd-601e-482c-8af0-903381e38f3b@HIDDEN> <2445d6dff0a8edb8c00b30111a967c02c4da0987.camel@HIDDEN> <8ecbe54e-f305-43ed-91c5-9f4608ac083a@HIDDEN> <87h63imzli.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z-GOoRwoYCX3q8of@HIDDEN> <Z-PxQbkdMMX3wGJC@jurong> <97420cd84fbcf27e84888e0c5331f042a29114ea.camel@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <97420cd84fbcf27e84888e0c5331f042a29114ea.camel@HIDDEN> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 9F439DDF X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.10 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM(-3.00)[-1.000]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[8]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVRCPT(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[famulari.name, gmail.com, gnu.org, elenq.tech, debbugs.gnu.org, wolfsden.cz, greghogan.com] X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Server: hera X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN>, Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>, Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>, Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN>, Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>, Ludovic =?iso-8859-15?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Am Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 02:52:40PM +0100 schrieb Liliana Marie Prikler: > > Also, my impression is that it would be better to rather quickly > > delete the master branch if we change names instead of keeping it > > around. It would be better to create an error instead of letting > > people stick with an outdated branch. In particular, we should make > > sure that "guix pull" either works with the new name or breaks > > visibly, so that people do not remain on "master" while thinking they > > are updating their system. > Could you elaborate on this? My proposal to keep "master" for the time > being, but pointing it towards "main" would make it unlikely that an > upgrade is not a real upgrade. Then, once configurations default to > using main, we can make upgrades smooth for everyone using the default > configuration. Sorry, I do not know well enough how "guix pull" works to really elaborate. And I am not sure what you mean by "master points towards main". Assume we change the default branch; then as a committer I will push to "main", and "master" is one commit behind. I do not think that it is possible in git to have "master" just be an alias for "main"? (Or maybe it is on codeberg?) Then we would have to manually or automatically let master follow main; by running a script as a git hook doing the equivalent of "git checkout master; git rebase origin/main; git push" (beware of recursive "git push" hooks...)? (Hm, this is a bit twisted, but it would be perfectly possible to have a local branch main that follows origin/master or vice versa, right? So locally each of us could use their own favourite terminology.) The first time one does a "guix pull", I think it amounts to a "git clone", so whatever the default branch is at this time will be used. Supposedly the next "guix pull" just does the equivalent of "git pull", so if I am on master (and master is not updated to follow main after every commit) I will not get the update. Probably if master is simply deleted, I will get an error message, and could then be invited to delete $HOME/.cache/guix/checkouts? That would be okay in my opinion. But as said, I am convinced the technical details can be worked out, but this requires to know exactly how "guix pull" works (which is probably your case). > > So maybe we should name the principal branch "caput" or "κεφάλαιο". > Maybe "head", alluding to "HEAD"? "caput" sadly has the meaning > "broken" if we pronounce it German ;) Well, I sort of liked the self-deprecating pun here :) But this was only in the bike shedding part about what we feel with respect to the change; as said before, in reality I would oppose anything but "master" or "main". I do not think anybody has a real problem with "main", and then it is simply a matter of practicality to switch to the second most used branch name instead of our own invention. Andreas
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Mar 2025 13:52:51 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 26 09:52:51 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42150 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1txRBa-0005GW-FX for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 09:52:50 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x343.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::343]:45232) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>) id 1txRBY-0005GD-5G for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 09:52:48 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-x343.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-43cfebc343dso52622015e9.2 for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 06:52:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1742997162; x=1743601962; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=he5q0YqVFR5STQLcQZV8HFuFoxYUsqbxBDFkc7cwhMU=; b=YaA0zolp6gFNf9j2XnqE2iC+vBgyL3JmrnxLwd4cfHFNK0EiDN9naHEsRG68PxURca XFomIrUqoFmzClDhah8W+aqLnpHJy6y1PJI1rc41fcp+FijZos0naaGlGiWCQ8NUyuBT 4v6JPWTAuBJVVU5jBSbh+fAFihAb8GlS3OWvmEVQli/bAzEaDNGXwwxn8RZYimqgPE3m FhC0M5JHVs4GcXRHKSPi87PG2g1fGi+UHa4IFPnhUuHYSpeylGqX/WlDMiW4TK8I2nfb W9tgfLYP2yHjOvuJ2qoSAvLE1RJQCoVioDu+gSgO/9cyZ4oDHR+y1/ApLNDLkW+malfm 9uWA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1742997162; x=1743601962; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=he5q0YqVFR5STQLcQZV8HFuFoxYUsqbxBDFkc7cwhMU=; b=pbyyisTk/LWpqSMo6dERWUwqLHao3rNLsR634jM3Omshq6UuI03PuwPBkrcp2uCEr3 tO1YYq1Tjs1ugkg+Sx0zWA3kcHXNsy7j3YvI76Wo4ArMCAdUim+wYxsiQ3PPk+Cn9OHQ BLuBbkrXyr7v7EtHj6irAJkKkPU0s3B1H1DMcWl9/BdPj5YZ+yztBpcxkChs2nJttBAU duHJduxdRSMbEOGwKl4rcHffyWVaX72zRVIGzCiWJPOEQvLXGvpIvJXTmqWLblWwDMS9 Rl/vGGUxzM0kkeLdvwdNcByvOSZJljYuBl/L8cJvN1aJmaX1EYp/bvc8EHYIHkgP2sDv rxlA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWUBfdwaTYPbCbqkysehfvrIqSMha177PnPOktsD9j5aC/zvg02Rpwrc0LIt2Hhof3lPl3Odw==@debbugs.gnu.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw64qNDiVFv/5yRiCfLfCpBBC1f4Xa17eUxBgwB8eVR0DUx5p/y mJUZOB0225OXEh4+2lWnpqkgObhyGfQk8U0qQ64t3ltbFhrYgh1F X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuSeHwCE8t3NxyDUBNflJuSz0j6/T1ZQ/zQJEk3gExMVi7t8rL47zJQHAYT3KV KCOX8YoRnIWxbxkaulK30Q9Vvyf9qi7s5CY8biLyB82loL8WV3rnMlEE+n4oJ/usC88uaXrSzoY YijSLctknNEYR+JXBau7LVgZXFxvGHrmBCTE06K92TqiG7F8uWYjjiH/uMIIRGyfdjDwDuhf3cH 6ofRHyVFO+v2lctZIytle8Zpu7fDBe9tzU5dKR8L7T8Z1moVCNZci8gCAa+Jjd7/PbHQW6wZCRH azluwcd4V9yXOjhdM1PC3NhU/dWoG4zeRP+j3hukXQf1IecnSAV7j70s8SahsFzj0xAXTLzGOOT 5mfs92B/4kPP2UXNZjQQy X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFQ6wBMnwtsTb6S0LpNwRq7HGZ0IiuE9R1o2qskxpnXYCkdO2CKC+1n9WkAin46/rTy8odksg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:46c3:b0:43c:f616:f08 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-43d6d04eeefmr75601305e9.8.1742997161776; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 06:52:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lumine.fritz.box (85-127-114-32.dsl.dynamic.surfer.at. [85.127.114.32]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-43d8314b3e2sm2605885e9.33.2025.03.26.06.52.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 26 Mar 2025 06:52:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <97420cd84fbcf27e84888e0c5331f042a29114ea.camel@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename the default branch From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> To: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>, Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 14:52:40 +0100 In-Reply-To: <Z-PxQbkdMMX3wGJC@jurong> References: <d2db73de82bb7bb3a6589a4299287d02dc961c14.camel@HIDDEN> <547c549d-970e-4331-8944-dc7a79698426@HIDDEN> <87wmcm2sqc.fsf@HIDDEN> <49ba31a6-6f1d-4607-9169-95b7dc557cfb@HIDDEN> <871puq8hd8.fsf@HIDDEN> <738287cd-601e-482c-8af0-903381e38f3b@HIDDEN> <2445d6dff0a8edb8c00b30111a967c02c4da0987.camel@HIDDEN> <8ecbe54e-f305-43ed-91c5-9f4608ac083a@HIDDEN> <87h63imzli.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z-GOoRwoYCX3q8of@HIDDEN> <Z-PxQbkdMMX3wGJC@jurong> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.54.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN>, Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>, Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>, Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN>, Ludovic =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Am Mittwoch, dem 26.03.2025 um 13:21 +0100 schrieb Andreas Enge: > Concerning the name, the current standard for git repositories is > "master". Apart from that, I have only seen "main". So maybe we can > agree that all other names are not practical? There is muscle memory > involved in typing "git checkout ...", and I do not see any point in > choosing a completely separate name only for the Guix project.=C2=A0 I'm pretty sure SVN users will remember trunk :) And I don't think that "practical" is necessarily defined on the number of other projects that use the same branch name. Perhaps within the wider Guix ecosystem, though, a single default branch name is preferable over an "anything goes" approach, and we seem to be heading towards "main" if we follow this route. > Also, my impression is that it would be better to rather quickly > delete the master branch if we change names instead of keeping it > around. It would be better to create an error instead of letting > people stick with an outdated branch. In particular, we should make > sure that "guix pull" either works with the new name or breaks > visibly, so that people do not remain on "master" while thinking they > are updating their system. Could you elaborate on this? My proposal to keep "master" for the time being, but pointing it towards "main" would make it unlikely that an upgrade is not a real upgrade. Then, once configurations default to using main, we can make upgrades smooth for everyone using the default configuration. The default configuration holds a special place here, because Guix is also used by people who do not have a deep understanding of all of its parts and would find a sudden, unprompted `guix pull' failure quite confusing. > Now to the bike shedding part. Personally, I only associate positive > things with "master" and its versions in other languages. Usually > the word designates a person with particular training in a skill: > A "master of arts" has a university degree, a "ma=C3=AEtre menuisier" or > "Tischlermeister" is particularly trained in original woodwork, more > so than a "compagnon" or "Geselle", a "maestro" takes part in > creating exceptionally nice music. I think this is clearer in other languages, where the use of the word master is more narrow and some uses, e.g. the German "lord over a people or dominion" have fallen out of fashion. Also, "master" doesn't translate uniquely into those languages, e.g. in German it's "meister" for the Tischlermeister, but "magister" or "magistra" for the academic degree =E2=80=93 that is, until we started using English wherever we had previously used Latin or French. > The negative connotations of the word "master" seem to come only from > a US American viewpoint from the word pair "master"/"slave"; so from > my point of view, we are importing a US American culture war, by > which I do not feel concerned, into our international project. There is also the German word "Herrenrasse" which translates into English as "master race"=E2=80=A6 and I don't think UK or US English makes = much of a difference w.r.t. that. Also, I don't know enough French computing lingo to be sure, but TIL that according to Wiktionary, ma=C3=AEtre/esclave is a thing. > All this is somewhat ironic: We start by using a language that is > foreign to many or probably even most of us, and end up being > expected to share also the cultural connotations linked to that > language (in a particular part of the world) that would not pose a > problem if we had used a different language from the start. Well, using a common language, we can come to a common understanding. =20 > So maybe we should name the principal branch "caput" or "=CE=BA=CE=B5=CF= =86=CE=AC=CE=BB=CE=B1=CE=B9=CE=BF". Maybe "head", alluding to "HEAD"? "caput" sadly has the meaning "broken" if we pronounce it German ;) We could also use "t=C3=AAte" if we wanna be French about it :) Cheers
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Mar 2025 12:21:38 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 26 08:21:37 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41877 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1txPlJ-00033U-EA for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 08:21:37 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:39628) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <andreas@HIDDEN>) id 1txPlH-00033G-CQ for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 08:21:36 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC632DBC; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 13:21:27 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: hera.aquilenet.fr; none X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavis at hera.aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id QC_HjTClLKvE; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 13:21:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from jurong (176-179-191-150.abo.bbox.fr [176.179.191.150]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 009A2DBB; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 13:21:23 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 13:21:21 +0100 From: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN> To: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename the default branch Message-ID: <Z-PxQbkdMMX3wGJC@jurong> References: <d2db73de82bb7bb3a6589a4299287d02dc961c14.camel@HIDDEN> <547c549d-970e-4331-8944-dc7a79698426@HIDDEN> <87wmcm2sqc.fsf@HIDDEN> <49ba31a6-6f1d-4607-9169-95b7dc557cfb@HIDDEN> <871puq8hd8.fsf@HIDDEN> <738287cd-601e-482c-8af0-903381e38f3b@HIDDEN> <2445d6dff0a8edb8c00b30111a967c02c4da0987.camel@HIDDEN> <8ecbe54e-f305-43ed-91c5-9f4608ac083a@HIDDEN> <87h63imzli.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z-GOoRwoYCX3q8of@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <Z-GOoRwoYCX3q8of@HIDDEN> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: EC632DBC X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.10 / 15.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; NEURAL_HAM(-3.00)[-1.000]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[8]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVRCPT(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[gmail.com, gnu.org, elenq.tech, debbugs.gnu.org, wolfsden.cz, greghogan.com] X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Server: hera X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN>, Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>, Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>, Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN>, Ludovic =?iso-8859-15?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello all, echoing Leo's statement, my intuition is that this proposal is poorly suited for a consensus based approach. There is not much compromise possible (in the end, we need a branch name and only one), on a subject where preferences are mainly based on feelings rather than technical merits (in reality, any branch name would work, it is purely a matter of convention). More generally, the GCD process has a strong bias in favour of change for bikeshedding issues: Unless a person strongly opposes the change (which is difficult to do, since then one is expected to work towards a consensus on whether the shed should be painted in red or blue), it is enough that 25% of the participants do reply with a weak "I accept" (and in practice I suppose that at least the author will support). So as Leo said, in such cases one is almost certain that a proposal will be accepted without there being a strong consensus that it is a good change. The proposal has a few technical drawbacks (there is always a cost involved in changing), but it looks to me like these can be overcome without too many problems as already suggested by several participants to the discussion. There do not seem to be real gains (except for people feeling better about a different name, which is somewhat vague for people not sharing that feeling). Concerning the name, the current standard for git repositories is "master". Apart from that, I have only seen "main". So maybe we can agree that all other names are not practical? There is muscle memory involved in typing "git checkout ...", and I do not see any point in choosing a completely separate name only for the Guix project. Also the "git checkout m<tab>" argument is convincing. Practically speaking, we could also stick with "master" and wait and see whether "main" becomes the majority, and decide to switch only if and when that happens. Also, my impression is that it would be better to rather quickly delete the master branch if we change names instead of keeping it around. It would be better to create an error instead of letting people stick with an outdated branch. In particular, we should make sure that "guix pull" either works with the new name or breaks visibly, so that people do not remain on "master" while thinking they are updating their system. Now to the bike shedding part. Personally, I only associate positive things with "master" and its versions in other languages. Usually the word designates a person with particular training in a skill: A "master of arts" has a university degree, a "maître menuisier" or "Tischlermeister" is particularly trained in original woodwork, more so than a "compagnon" or "Geselle", a "maestro" takes part in creating exceptionally nice music. The negative connotations of the word "master" seem to come only from a US American viewpoint from the word pair "master"/"slave"; so from my point of view, we are importing a US American culture war, by which I do not feel concerned, into our international project. Ekaitz writes: "the USA imperialism is forced upon me." Even before reading his words, I essentially felt the same. Maybe we could call it "US American cultural dominance" to be a bit more neutral. We are already expected to communicate in English (while I may regret that Latin has gone out of fashion, I must admit that English is just the most practical solution right now). We are expected to use US American spelling. Now we consider pandering to US American sensitivities with respect to their history on how we name our branches. (As far as I understand, the author of the proposal is not from the USA, but this does not invalidate the argument about cultural dominance.) All this is somewhat ironic: We start by using a language that is foreign to many or probably even most of us, and end up being expected to share also the cultural connotations linked to that language (in a particular part of the world) that would not pose a problem if we had used a different language from the start. So maybe we should name the principal branch "caput" or "κεφάλαιο". Andreas
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Mar 2025 13:01:50 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Mar 25 09:01:50 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36862 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1tx3uf-00024I-G1
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Mar 2025 09:01:50 -0400
Received: from mail-wm1-x32b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::32b]:46430)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>)
id 1tx3tW-00020W-48
for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Mar 2025 09:00:39 -0400
Received: by mail-wm1-x32b.google.com with SMTP id
5b1f17b1804b1-43bb6b0b898so53626135e9.1
for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 25 Mar 2025 06:00:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1742907632; x=1743512432; darn=debbugs.gnu.org;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references
:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
:reply-to; bh=G3MHfl74vbIZcezmddU/FrmZT2sqPED5i7fuK7NdWaQ=;
b=OhY0FtKE8dXWbSH8HbDu2Ip36ZucMRNatGqk+xhEW22ps2yuojBVhBtkWdJw23MMOr
2qvXJNUkwf8nAsfbzXEDV2PR8OPFlxfaQEGxVanknFKljpuxYvRRPek8WKkWaOTMGvrZ
QHUFTG5XLsWIkFITHXHS9vNd4RUezyLU8+oDEQtB8gSvU1kkED8zdzblgsomqoB6Khur
rkP//vRYDVNNshD6QoF2HJFioavdg+7+CjoN8WWB6IDAJVNRdTfmv5tzRoD0liFtXSUC
g42ZlFJvHiTcvzCrXNRJ+NWNJ6T3kowZqdeaMapdJLWj4E6I/L/mNDw3A6UEaA/nCEVh
z0bw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1742907632; x=1743512432;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references
:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=G3MHfl74vbIZcezmddU/FrmZT2sqPED5i7fuK7NdWaQ=;
b=lNBwTi7KoRjz+7X1zd/91nMRO+lcvI60nNlqMdRZyhKCnklZWF/AOjHVg0VR7pWcB5
Yg2XTKNIc5N21JKGJlfuFrpK8tW7M0u67NGVSdXsZqdHZPdj5x1x/TESfw7aR2tPvfNM
rN/601cKE6puKecMWelVU1gKcLcq7MoC73UPfILhmfkejMT8UFUr/8yuohoCJvkK+89V
qgZs+eXU/KBoQ6qeAT9GMwQiSFs+pZd4MwbiJTlEtUe5rZ9J4qcHHS1z5Kbe9s7qf0yL
1xdzK/oMbefPDsz0bhnK8h1HbecCbNY3WL5i3pwDr1iobrL0r13qfdFakxvDOXf90Bqo
bVNA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YztO337nzg5PuCq1UC84fqLsGxqpZ684nl+Hz5BCLeIWSlFMWdo
J9mNjXSXZxwMBJ4avwVGuZq3wQstBLhbE5mtqlXMfZCYDWz2YAuL8BQR4A==
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsdfQbcXZzoBRCj7YrGgQtfIPCrpjOaftSaovbUDpJfPo26pjm2Vli6U6dWlYc
CReahginUUj+uUoO40607ablmS2yJfpgDBOKk4qw9WjGsQC4qQk+YpnbDuJGUJQo+hoJOZbnX0H
kPrMHKCHWIBHizHXbJnQJPZy3izPyqrOtMaZJb+BqNvGAPwGJ4Hnal04OOixS66zhrsTB/v+Eqm
ULhiUINj39X9ykliWv1zh430JPSkyOX9mJL/MjEeJzJ3N0xxgWwB6Yh20nxyqVZhxCaEcH0ZRad
LKvGFcuKEIoZhzK9gt6EfLz9SFJXQd7l6sGHDYyAEW3nXzafzs79BzwXWDv03j8a+lp6YgbV5DM
kIvcOja+RAArKf0KupIcatHnKhs7+Sg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHGkMDwgoJNFfu11F0Z+yyro1N9uCglQVSaxF3ipRWnfOI72WEAdneO2haep33wF/kdki4MnQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:59ae:0:b0:390:de58:d7fe with SMTP id
ffacd0b85a97d-3997f942339mr15733161f8f.51.1742907631836;
Tue, 25 Mar 2025 06:00:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lili (roam-nat-fw-prg-194-254-61-46.net.univ-paris-diderot.fr.
[194.254.61.46]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
ffacd0b85a97d-3997f9e6767sm13982971f8f.66.2025.03.25.06.00.31
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
Tue, 25 Mar 2025 06:00:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
To: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>
Subject: Re: [bug#76407] About consensus (was Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename
the default branch)
In-Reply-To: <871pum6s2m.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <c2532d09-e54b-49fe-9ace-dca55239f394@HIDDEN>
<d2db73de82bb7bb3a6589a4299287d02dc961c14.camel@HIDDEN>
<547c549d-970e-4331-8944-dc7a79698426@HIDDEN>
<87wmcm2sqc.fsf@HIDDEN>
<49ba31a6-6f1d-4607-9169-95b7dc557cfb@HIDDEN>
<871puq8hd8.fsf@HIDDEN>
<738287cd-601e-482c-8af0-903381e38f3b@HIDDEN>
<2445d6dff0a8edb8c00b30111a967c02c4da0987.camel@HIDDEN>
<8ecbe54e-f305-43ed-91c5-9f4608ac083a@HIDDEN>
<87h63imzli.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z-GOoRwoYCX3q8of@HIDDEN>
<87frj2e15r.fsf@HIDDEN> <871pum6s2m.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 13:30:48 +0100
Message-ID: <8734f1i96v.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407
Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
Hi Tomas,
On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 at 22:23, Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> wrote:
> Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> writes:
>
>> Somehow, in all this thread, after re-reading it, I=E2=80=99m still miss=
ing the
>> =E2=80=9Cactive=E2=80=9D part from: =C2=AB these concerns are actively r=
esolved through
>> counter proposals. A deliberating member disapproving a proposal bears
>> a responsibility for finding alternatives, proposing ideas or code, or
>> explaining the rationale for the status quo. =C2=BB
>
> But we are not in a deliberation period yet, so there, by definition, is
> no "A deliberating member disapproving a proposal". At least if I read
> the GCD #1 correctly.
The GCD reads:
Anyone who is a team member is a deliberating member
Contributors and even more so team members are expected to help
build consensus.
Therefore, my understanding of the paragraph,
A deliberating member disapproving a proposal bears a
responsibility for finding alternatives, proposing ideas or
code, or explaining the rationale for the status quo.
reads =E2=80=9Cdeliberating member=E2=80=9D <=3D=3D> =E2=80=9Cteam member=
=E2=80=9D here.
Well, I do not know if the GCD #001 appears to you unclear but, to me,
it reads:
+ We discuss the specific elements of the document for building a
consensus. The discussion is open to anyone; team members are
expected to help build consensus.
+ Once it=E2=80=99s done, team members deliberate.
Somehow, it would not make much sense that a team member waits the
(last) Deliberation Period to be active in finding alternatives,
proposing ideas or code, or explaining the rationale for the status quo.
When such activity fits the Discussion Period, IMHO.
That=E2=80=99s said, I read good faith in the intent of your comment and I
refrain myself to see some nitpicking.
Cheers,
simon
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Mar 2025 21:23:53 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Mar 24 17:23:53 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59658 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1twpGy-0005VM-PJ for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 17:23:53 -0400 Received: from wolfsden.cz ([37.205.8.62]:42260) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <~@wolfsden.cz>) id 1twpGv-0005UI-8v for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 17:23:50 -0400 Received: by wolfsden.cz (Postfix, from userid 104) id 3C052389B23; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 21:23:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=wolfsden.cz; s=mail; t=1742851427; bh=IK0ENkipjGByU6mzxicFDSWLFyi1VBLWashMzcHjhPI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=uqkvNQVM2Acusr9eozmNcX5PD7H9bGkGbTuQw5E2WmOaXsG82KhiHl0yZ9Ry3qeki sZEopbjtAFuGwkBK7SxED0o99tWw31nLOaaQvqqpwh21bqjWtOWREOIkbRlCQaTVgP cAFeSdyya2c6lrXKmjj9j+t6gTv9azMjmE7CtpPfQ6DKjczUnDwjSBZC0H8eFz4/sg dz8Q2Hakfs2AUP2dm4ZSA8r9i/kXbRceftvSQgmNuKj6yWUQ+7PQeFJ2KLGKa7/E6a i0+tLpYYLuCdG+5Xck85UHOas30diYAwhv5J+WNVQ5SDMHHL6v5VHgbm3X8h821NI1 HollCQl8uXHHONhpoNoNp6EAxdPoxj6KtopYpkI3SBDP0/MjeJmN+au+mzk7rvluNC wlXP+FaHWXmvJipniWMM3AEqNtxNiGjVa6UKfH0K1Z73FewjcHs/wc1krqeIe9jjhL JF+Nmv9gqmPh2JE0Y+C3a6whEwhUanM9Vtt+2cREjVeuGe0KANn7ZyQYv8xf/IUAXl F31bV8/hiwgwam5QeHomH+xlACDHZdLYD9vmAX6JXMjUkH/qpPpBl2ZzGP4/whMbn6 qJPnto1GBFjklwyX3zdZAC0IqqLigFSitOoqrIO6fSfVVugNclr6eOWjE1S7Qy15vb naTpqMhSSTJ8DooBry+WKCSw= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on wolfsden X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from localhost (unknown [128.0.188.242]) by wolfsden.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EFA0D38A512; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 21:23:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=wolfsden.cz; s=mail; t=1742851426; bh=IK0ENkipjGByU6mzxicFDSWLFyi1VBLWashMzcHjhPI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=bHRXxtEU4Zv7lIXTp3VNDKrB/urpxlHb2nH3txqxYTGTd62CGK3LhjPqdP0mU4tPj KX7tiZvltFKqxJwyRb20zmvp2Aiw5kWzTBdJlpIY8/e1DRhJKWcjOy7/usrb3Q3wtN hcb/fdVUVJrljvDC0uMe9ITo1RXJNFPFwqEipQsVkOmGGP95XTqnrJWbAhgil1GeA3 Y6+M8lHzmJPMMpNJgNwnnOwaLKKQKmHkyktPGoPUDBiRQyEnjyugIqJ0Hh8VPQceth jWQfvQF0vjRhQRl37YajGofiuFjK0IZCOVrg+nO89FFymuOmkdqrSjwvPwGsViUviz Eu2azVbLINzE7+6hUSrDX2wTVqDyUvSnp84CzRsG6O7jiEY3Mxwos/fNntHhtfsM0J uQetPa7/zN1eII7v+PNELatRdTvgOSUz4vShByIyv/mfz8jdTxnPtuOCH66KiX6wC9 rJNtaMJQy6IOK3g89+HAYcJprMUUg27uwJp1FXNrx7s/Wsni72hFLEF33h+/8T2NHD 0SdGyi2xaClHxSb+JQ59kULmT/xwBYbpzK0jFFh2U6FCsUZ3h61luFlT+anGZiTWQO A0+K7MWMOJweA75yIxbumZl+rv8SP3+FVENSo5mxHgRJ4TZsV8a8MaCWnVYiYWQqw3 R+qgusOQn23a4io2spg/fb7k= From: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> To: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#76407] About consensus (was Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename the default branch) In-Reply-To: <87frj2e15r.fsf@HIDDEN> (Simon Tournier's message of "Mon, 24 Mar 2025 19:25:36 +0100") References: <c2532d09-e54b-49fe-9ace-dca55239f394@HIDDEN> <d2db73de82bb7bb3a6589a4299287d02dc961c14.camel@HIDDEN> <547c549d-970e-4331-8944-dc7a79698426@HIDDEN> <87wmcm2sqc.fsf@HIDDEN> <49ba31a6-6f1d-4607-9169-95b7dc557cfb@HIDDEN> <871puq8hd8.fsf@HIDDEN> <738287cd-601e-482c-8af0-903381e38f3b@HIDDEN> <2445d6dff0a8edb8c00b30111a967c02c4da0987.camel@HIDDEN> <8ecbe54e-f305-43ed-91c5-9f4608ac083a@HIDDEN> <87h63imzli.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z-GOoRwoYCX3q8of@HIDDEN> <87frj2e15r.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 22:23:45 +0100 Message-ID: <871pum6s2m.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> writes: > Somehow, in all this thread, after re-reading it, I=E2=80=99m still missi= ng the > =E2=80=9Cactive=E2=80=9D part from: =C2=AB these concerns are actively re= solved through > counter proposals. A deliberating member disapproving a proposal bears > a responsibility for finding alternatives, proposing ideas or code, or > explaining the rationale for the status quo. =C2=BB But we are not in a deliberation period yet, so there, by definition, is no "A deliberating member disapproving a proposal". At least if I read the GCD #1 correctly. Tomas =2D-=20 There are only two hard things in Computer Science: cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJCBAEBCgAsFiEEt4NJs4wUfTYpiGikL7/ufbZ/wakFAmfhzWEOHH5Ad29sZnNk ZW4uY3oACgkQL7/ufbZ/wakBfA//UPg/4AdVnfhUymqFism+UT2sfY6lKX6N6Gbe 0moVxh2cHTZo66C4zINm7K0OJuI1fWL//qgJV3zASRqdUjPUHbyfgULNnvkjW3Xa nSuJwA0DYf+6Y5jFwDBbF5+UH6w0xfQ4T4EyxbpTy/Yp6Ezd2eA98WCZOGOYg9iU ksHqYfF7FQNhToGI/yHIpTZFSt/vWnqUumxBT8whgEkNW22foCeXh3nyTIVKXo1E clpGsf0a1WRD351xAEy0uSkpTkuxlVNeK0UkoJ12+8XZT7N5DcsLNXPcYfmYW8ed fkD+LfON1XZ9CMuzvME0qlY9D0fWECMLtq85f+sIbIPp5pcu9Cj6l1YTwkSnxzH+ RRxdtOvmm8+uM224HQNeSMKvZCVJAfjHXtMewvIeYdY+UUh1cZn1Y7Kol5+0RutW lNgat5dMQ/VfnCXpkB3tiCuiiEFSIb8aOyOGmgONlyhKtBUBFTb9GMMt5WQqyS9o 7xEqqIFdXOAnyCrMQDDsJ0/oM4XdJL0lui1NVFSQHVjOOYk6Z8cNEAOpGuCtr1kR /lGnHCdSMI+AoIcdcFZl3fzWGpnqRWW0k//Y4hmHQz/Dtei0C0Hsw8cTJouw9tR2 gHkHW46uT/5s9ysFhaYIxTOTLoHXc5lZAFFhkb1Ivm1EAuDDokofvOdTnScUcaJX MqOdZjA= =ZU6A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Mar 2025 18:50:17 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Mar 24 14:50:17 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58407 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1twmsK-0000O7-BF
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 14:50:16 -0400
Received: from mail-wr1-x435.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::435]:42040)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>)
id 1twmsF-0000I8-2I
for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 14:50:13 -0400
Received: by mail-wr1-x435.google.com with SMTP id
ffacd0b85a97d-3913d129c1aso3407851f8f.0
for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 11:50:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1742842205; x=1743447005; darn=debbugs.gnu.org;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references
:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
:reply-to; bh=3JVevcJfvXEg2W0t5jXLZLcZqQpphuvarYNqwNyfsLA=;
b=QF5Wd/jF/Vaf0y9YTTjJ7wcSd9jEnqmTpc2R4gkgM9E40WTz+zQnqXlUtsEgF3x6pI
lw5+7InbWBOhmEHUTWDhjSS570TNxSlmye4xNI+87lQpy45dBAXbuFJYSxbpGP0KyETJ
NIguhx4T6u8orVqukPoGws+bjRZ6Ies/kLF0KMpnIUoXO33SfUMJYBduhyBj6+5t/2LW
yBZ9Xj8buqlHMG4WxfiFiu5qB0ZK6kwqTQ2Q6mIeZPIYhDDXvrvJhYC11i83n6IWpG6H
F3VPELAeev2QhTIpnczgV/dbKM1iWn1UFZYT1WzmvIQnSS8+Di+AtLOc4MHIPYLqbxnJ
dCrQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1742842205; x=1743447005;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references
:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=3JVevcJfvXEg2W0t5jXLZLcZqQpphuvarYNqwNyfsLA=;
b=sS0OdawVgGXzbHt7e6/2j/APo5BNkS1I8TI+C/WV1prM3SkJ5/mYAkkbtHFzSYcRJo
Z0lQu/600U+Kwu+WqjPkV9zJOIcWgIt5N7JA1ObyZO7kwk0rA8Y+BVSrHR0VwoiU7w+w
ztR5Z5WzU9FbXtuecAeupHX9dreD0C6CBwprE1L97DBPmEWueN4s1Oqn7CCsBsDdD6po
I4GX9XgdWdPXrET9McyTzTGYlQFU4fw3YvtGlDelA2bt8YCk+NBoiFUb0yDTjjzdY9ao
Kf8WrQcguZrwfZ3v4XKQ2Zm8u3XgkYuM6B63iawfj2KxgmbrIaSAHdJTCqTH6WKE9gvX
2mXA==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1;
AJvYcCWTRE5ZJyTCILNo++bGLrL+oE5oOTk1Ydf8GTpmR1QbbgSbzTgYuTb5LvfVPC/10sFPYo5fGQ==@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzuGXCKk2trWjHJpmOe6+2FnCgp4/m4rmDnD7tccLC5n9zPPVFb
BJwlbNrEf6NMtBF8mUKwSZOxc1obyiZW/DbS+zlaN7CVxEERZ0x6
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsZtt34MxNCfofEqDYSWUAbqu5O6U/u6PvmZ7YavtzdV0wU59VKQkBUt7BT5Ji
inb1VcAURxunVbE97ZOoYpwQLIzd569G357s/ZjQksJYnWYnhgm3DItbJHfje4ZmuY3IxXLWJXO
DgU1nPBwssW14UpTdg+fD6jW742UUUnATpVwCrTU2vn8xalPSH3s7jUuwkK9T1w9DZYxySbrIVt
bSOiPxC/HcSTDXcgABnoXToJ5hl2wQIh6Fit+79zrheTlBjtXCz/aXvlTHvbndsv6W09KXg/dyG
/RtHZuxtz9hjySMfQKdLx1Pu/ruvuaeMp4n+cZSkmY9c
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH6wAxZ68okljx1bi0iaaWuAQqGiBgjy44wpR6ErkgGtNpH1OmOLo7GTKWo+LjeGlkPj2SnVg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1a87:b0:38d:b12f:60d1 with SMTP id
ffacd0b85a97d-3997f93d892mr12671793f8f.26.1742842204600;
Mon, 24 Mar 2025 11:50:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pfiuh07 ([193.48.40.241]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
ffacd0b85a97d-3997f9eff6esm11617933f8f.100.2025.03.24.11.50.04
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
Mon, 24 Mar 2025 11:50:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
To: Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN>, 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename the default branch
In-Reply-To: <CA+3U0ZnvNArEXDXewc8MSLthSRhwBHykWxZahTO+5CuZJ=WGqA@HIDDEN>
References: <d835c85c709a393309e6cad4ab065d039f1e08af.camel@HIDDEN>
<f072096c292546c760d1342aa7d4f6c950027da9.camel@HIDDEN>
<87seocwh1p.fsf@HIDDEN> <87msej45ha.fsf@HIDDEN>
<87wmdk8fpd.fsf@wireframe>
<c2532d09-e54b-49fe-9ace-dca55239f394@HIDDEN>
<d2db73de82bb7bb3a6589a4299287d02dc961c14.camel@HIDDEN>
<547c549d-970e-4331-8944-dc7a79698426@HIDDEN>
<87wmcm2sqc.fsf@HIDDEN>
<49ba31a6-6f1d-4607-9169-95b7dc557cfb@HIDDEN>
<871puq8hd8.fsf@HIDDEN>
<738287cd-601e-482c-8af0-903381e38f3b@HIDDEN>
<2445d6dff0a8edb8c00b30111a967c02c4da0987.camel@HIDDEN>
<8ecbe54e-f305-43ed-91c5-9f4608ac083a@HIDDEN>
<87h63imzli.fsf@HIDDEN>
<CA+3U0ZnvNArEXDXewc8MSLthSRhwBHykWxZahTO+5CuZJ=WGqA@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 19:45:55 +0100
Message-ID: <87cye6e07w.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407
Cc: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
Hi Greg,
On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 at 10:08, Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN> wrote:
> We can more easily find consensus by saying less (the opposite of a
> majoritarian system).
Do you specifically speak about the GCD at hand proposing to rename the
branch from =E2=80=9Cmaster=E2=80=9D to =E2=80=9Cmain=E2=80=9D? Or about g=
enerically about consensus?
Well, IIUC, it=E2=80=99s about the GCD at hand and your concrete proposal [=
1]
is:
Can we find greater but narrower consensus around the practical
motivation that 1) most users leave unchanged the git default "main=
",
therefore "master" will become increasingly uncommon and unexpected,
2) the choice of "main" is masterfully similar when tab-completing =
or
looking through a sorted list of refs, and 3) the move to Codeberg
presents a hopefully rare opportunity combine disruptive changes? We
do not need a comprehensive motivation if we can find consensus on =
the
outcome.
Right?
This appears to me reasonable. Your proposal is to narrow the
Motivation section, right?
Cheers,
simon
1: [bug#76407] [GCD] A better name for the default branch
Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN>
Fri, 28 Feb 2025 10:46:05 -0500
id:CA+3U0ZmnhHSbd=3DsKRYVhYDJ+c4AJZBos91GKMwSAm7OEQ4Wmkg@HIDDEN
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/76407
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/msgid/CA+3U0ZmnhHSbd=3DsKRYVhYDJ+c4AJZBos91GKMw=
SAm7OEQ4Wmkg@HIDDEN
https://yhetil.org/guix/CA+3U0ZmnhHSbd=3DsKRYVhYDJ+c4AJZBos91GKMwSAm7OEQ4Wm=
kg@HIDDEN
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Mar 2025 18:50:16 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Mar 24 14:50:16 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58404 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1twmsJ-0000Nu-1x for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 14:50:16 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x430.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::430]:60622) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1twmsE-0000Ht-Cc for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 14:50:12 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-x430.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-39129fc51f8so3870421f8f.0 for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 11:50:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1742842204; x=1743447004; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=A+3Qh/JPpV/Oj33qBxBkPIFFs+0G1qCpEZq0PSr+8kU=; b=LilQMBzaLK8dc0VE+v4oyryZhYKEA3df2Mt4cKXWTmmV3gxw4zAp+WHV77OsoUvl7L 5pzuzykfM/GqdjI/glhkbdZY0BjQn5VNHfPPiFqybfcEtinJpjPgw2yhupyWM52AJMZd HKKC+/5oDWbUZNWqGzkKW4W9+njjgz8iSyWJC4aWiutYjfW75JVyjrRN1wcJXSpyVm7O zplbefpzR6wjXDmb/unf2SRYqGeoJT5KJ9ogm+1CN5szA4SNGVdpfToemb7jZhB4Ma9m ioiqEaTtmRFU3Oi9ZHCdUzZNt1v59Jb6erxeyqVta8k+RvM/tOwG/SBljvqjwshC8+DO j9wA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1742842204; x=1743447004; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=A+3Qh/JPpV/Oj33qBxBkPIFFs+0G1qCpEZq0PSr+8kU=; b=FbVnfaV5bee0/6W4f8/1kzksMj0zkL5Ez9NgkADxpdCy19oOas/mxqlb9Nugwcdu7a Aqh99R9QRLKU4LwrUU3ZnqWNHl4SBM+fZ1fNplmcRKu7whJoyeNTVp1R6R0aDw/2pB8u ZQYpmDc9hoa/tcxSgagkpGeh0AbcWhUoY76FHzAWLRF5u6T0DAgLUy24QKFfd/Sv/6FG Wp3J1ybtlKOgS1nbeSS1D6Y5wYBL2k61kS2BwH0eWPGgSFMn95xlm+VDuo2kA/2IWzJv KJwKa2rV5k1Sre38U+Ny8hohp7/NdDLCcpBkO+c5K+NqOBZsF2/YZfcXF8d8ALh2GrYY kAIg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXxfVxvJzkKz8ncP7fsu2cFh/jCqFMQffIVJofCAEgrXw3NEb8rof5nis2UqcddAYHoYPNO8g==@debbugs.gnu.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxfYpTEE63ObFGUKxOgZjFIsdQysTyzfi3p2BZPhY8o2dezsFcF vgGRXzMV2yqLYK/5TUJpB2K3uZ+hh2X6a/LvEnrpbG8iE+0iKjEzwFGlUg== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuYJW76R5bKqKGTuGVa6GCCGxQu0z6YbmcAvnvWlK74DjYwGE1aplppYK4duCV Uggo3dveFUswHlHYLp0qBTt421AkLJ3PBwmeZxT1evVwE9HFGKgFLAgBtKhtIDd8brNhHcyxDfg biT+zmwOs2N/dt9LkQBGi5nF81ndOTdclfXCC1WYHps+CL7qhbU8Gh114xh3yRWz8XqIvn26CIf y2iUreQdlLly40VVs5le3hNP/P8TmQah6B05aBYO/Tjsuq3jye1TN5okpTVE6SBumGBqglqYIia 9G4kKh1iEwIhE1jcU+YgUe3ltgcgNQqwJ1d6FDY//giJ X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHDbGSeZx3d8Df4jlF873xeHaHJqvji6uV0Nd2TIqqSra4/2bqoO3UZmxVfoScZ0V/bgDHs2g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:184b:b0:38d:e584:81ea with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3997f940541mr12800337f8f.45.1742842203942; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 11:50:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pfiuh07 ([193.48.40.241]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-3997f9a50c1sm11846123f8f.38.2025.03.24.11.50.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 24 Mar 2025 11:50:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> To: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> Subject: About consensus (was Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename the default branch) In-Reply-To: <Z-GOoRwoYCX3q8of@HIDDEN> References: <c2532d09-e54b-49fe-9ace-dca55239f394@HIDDEN> <d2db73de82bb7bb3a6589a4299287d02dc961c14.camel@HIDDEN> <547c549d-970e-4331-8944-dc7a79698426@HIDDEN> <87wmcm2sqc.fsf@HIDDEN> <49ba31a6-6f1d-4607-9169-95b7dc557cfb@HIDDEN> <871puq8hd8.fsf@HIDDEN> <738287cd-601e-482c-8af0-903381e38f3b@HIDDEN> <2445d6dff0a8edb8c00b30111a967c02c4da0987.camel@HIDDEN> <8ecbe54e-f305-43ed-91c5-9f4608ac083a@HIDDEN> <87h63imzli.fsf@HIDDEN> <Z-GOoRwoYCX3q8of@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 19:25:36 +0100 Message-ID: <87frj2e15r.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>, Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN>, 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Leo, On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 at 17:56, Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> wrote: > Now we get into semantics, but I disagree that "consent means accepting > another angle than our own". The other part =E2=80=9Cone angle that I do not fully share but I can live = with=E2=80=9D of the quote matters, IMHO. :-) Anyway. If my wording was poor or misleading, sorry, so let point to the dictionary: If you give your consent to something, you give someone permission to do it. If you consent to something, you agree to do it or to allow it to be done. Yes, I agree that Making Decision based on consensus is a challenging bet at the scale of Guix. The most difficult part, IMHO, is to keep some conditions [1] under the constraints asynchronous and full remote. I=E2=80=99m still confident. :-) We will see=E2=80=A6 =20=20=20=20 In the all cases =E2=80=93 whatever any other final decision making system = as voting we would pick=E2=80=93, the practice of trying to reach a consensus appears to me sane and healthy because it pushes all the participants to be active in finding solutions. Yeah some subjects =E2=80=93 choosing betw= een the color yellow or orange for stuff =E2=80=93 seem inadequate, but consens= us is still worth to try, IMHO. :-) As said elsewhere, I=E2=80=99ve a rough draft of a GCD for amending GCDs. = Then, it would allow to amend GCD 001 and improve the process itself; for instance, we could imagine a mechanism that triggers some last resort option falling back to some voting method =E2=80=93 well it raises many det= ails that need to be discussed in some dedicated thread. ;-) For now with the GCD at hand, I think we all need to work on the objections specific to the document. Because, re-reading all the thread, what I observe is some general arguments not focused on the document itself. Somehow, in all this thread, after re-reading it, I=E2=80=99m still missing= the =E2=80=9Cactive=E2=80=9D part from: =C2=AB these concerns are actively reso= lved through counter proposals. A deliberating member disapproving a proposal bears a responsibility for finding alternatives, proposing ideas or code, or explaining the rationale for the status quo. =C2=BB Well, I am going to do my homework=E2=80=A6 :-) Cheers, simon 1: https://www.seedsforchange.org.uk/consensus#conditions
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Mar 2025 16:56:12 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Mar 24 12:56:12 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57611 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1twl5w-00048V-Bw for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 12:56:12 -0400 Received: from fhigh-a7-smtp.messagingengine.com ([103.168.172.158]:56583) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1twl5t-000488-6u for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 12:56:09 -0400 Received: from phl-compute-04.internal (phl-compute-04.phl.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 549621140210; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 12:56:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-01 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-04.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 24 Mar 2025 12:56:03 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type :date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s= mesmtp; t=1742835363; x=1742921763; bh=wA8ruc7ZTXyKhVECy6+WkcwKd 5hraLy/5D6V/lZDZd0=; b=ynXwIIFhF2PjzvywwJ5IQ8Mmaf0OWm4G2hLFEX1P7 9nuFjLmKL+ajZ+MgXW7Im8X/82AsuOTAl4t4pTK73N8Cr1xgNwhdhAnvmMexNf39 rNe6DIXUM/IuBAv/kn2IwlAGrROc2w7o3VWjFEf4hcAhqgF575RK5+opNPAIwXXK r8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1742835363; x= 1742921763; bh=wA8ruc7ZTXyKhVECy6+WkcwKd5hraLy/5D6V/lZDZd0=; b=i 6eBOz7Es7e1kLLCjJiEov/lztDP1viCa4HWSuyyjuJiRB8M+weaXk3LsybA285Q2 P7kzLXn/uLlhz4vGjQOoN/LGh9P1hU5ALe46FVfR45ynTWt7qJM/be5Llb81Lljv zueHXRl6B90lnw+JK/HyrvYj4fBnDDYTqodNlIpXVBhU/LqxncZGgA3w4uxeA7Vv ng9O1cg5cESPXBHC4UfzIKeODobckaUxKZtmY7B1XxTbJoO3HF8zpdliQyb/vsCJ 0vwi7np7pKQJgTIh1Ka00ekeJBnb0TitpFgu5PcUw4XTqWd3rU/ohgLYJhUzTXFu NqC5f1Um3Aa6LbT9EX7Uw== X-ME-Sender: <xms:oo7hZ00NqWwAh-b0DH_IqPSbg7i3zpOHSMbua186G69e5UoJ13tmJQ> <xme:oo7hZ_Hz33brSlZ0xD2yfVahnvid66uvQ4IKQhuhBPEEnUu9WqtbbWdhdrhVev0wQ Or6m10LEIOByVPZ6A> X-ME-Received: <xmr:oo7hZ867EarOqy-mdpN2SdxMxVJz7um1zMWDstWTj6Q6y1pn1FIy-fCA1cmvHUCzKSLESjxrbv5mjedUFcJO41jp> X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefvddrtddtgdduiedtfedtucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggv pdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpih gvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepfffhvfevuffkfhggtggugfgjsehtkeertddt tdejnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrih drnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpefgheejtdetheeujeelueekuedtgffggffh veevgeelvdelueeigeffjedthefgudenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrh grmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvpdhnsggprhgt phhtthhopeehpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopeiiihhmohhnrdhtoh huthhouhhnvgesghhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopegvkhgrihhtiiesvghlvghn qhdrthgvtghhpdhrtghpthhtoheplhhilhhirghnrgdrphhrihhklhgvrhesghhmrghilh drtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehluhguohesghhnuhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopeejieeg tdejseguvggssghughhsrdhgnhhurdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:oo7hZ912E2PPqY7EsYz9ls2n0u8iHmlhqzO-9RLkTEkFdKV6VwC2Nw> <xmx:oo7hZ3HuEyK5uYx2KyexVnbTeWbSrqXgGxYuccE0--WGMOM4l97xpQ> <xmx:oo7hZ2-oyLlZtcr6HU7qC244dHba8su-fAkayltis-YEoY7ojitLqg> <xmx:oo7hZ8kCtVykjgwzUW3KI8Vo3bH39LYI6fBp7cZtBnDHgR063kkFAQ> <xmx:o47hZ4PBPBk3fUm_t0SeT2v2Ae_-nQ1uCxGvAAzwn9o3xxtHB9Eso5nf> Feedback-ID: i819c4023:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 12:56:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 12:56:01 -0400 From: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> To: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename the default branch Message-ID: <Z-GOoRwoYCX3q8of@HIDDEN> References: <c2532d09-e54b-49fe-9ace-dca55239f394@HIDDEN> <d2db73de82bb7bb3a6589a4299287d02dc961c14.camel@HIDDEN> <547c549d-970e-4331-8944-dc7a79698426@HIDDEN> <87wmcm2sqc.fsf@HIDDEN> <49ba31a6-6f1d-4607-9169-95b7dc557cfb@HIDDEN> <871puq8hd8.fsf@HIDDEN> <738287cd-601e-482c-8af0-903381e38f3b@HIDDEN> <2445d6dff0a8edb8c00b30111a967c02c4da0987.camel@HIDDEN> <8ecbe54e-f305-43ed-91c5-9f4608ac083a@HIDDEN> <87h63imzli.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87h63imzli.fsf@HIDDEN> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>, Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN>, 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 12:34:33PM +0100, Simon Tournier wrote: > Consent does not mean we are all convinced, neither we fully support, > neither we are deeply aligned, neither our own opinion reads “yeah this > change the best idea ever”, etc. Consent means accepting another angle > than our own, one angle that I do not fully share but I can live with. Now we get into semantics, but I disagree that "consent means accepting another angle than our own". Consent should be active and, at least to some degree, enthusiastic. If we can't reach an enthusiastic consensus without strong objections from team members, then we can talk about using another method of making a decision, like I mentioned in my earlier email. But we shouldn't call it consensus. To repeat my earlier email again, I've been involved in decisions made by "consensus" where the reality is that a small group of advocates pushed very hard to make a change and eventually exhausted those with objections. The objectors made a calculated decision to accept the change because the cost to them, personally, of ultimately rejecting the proposal was too high. I think that's a valid way to decide, but it's not consensus. I understand the GCD process to aim higher than that. It requires us all to demonstrate leadership, solidarity, and care. It's easy to propose something, but then the work begins. Maybe I'm too pessimistic, but I don't think it will be possible to reach a consensus on every subject we discuss.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Mar 2025 16:49:00 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Mar 24 12:49:00 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57593 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1twkyy-0003gx-ES for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 12:49:00 -0400 Received: from fhigh-a7-smtp.messagingengine.com ([103.168.172.158]:44171) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1twkyv-0003gd-Fg for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 12:48:58 -0400 Received: from phl-compute-05.internal (phl-compute-05.phl.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC22D1140209; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 12:48:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-01 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-05.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 24 Mar 2025 12:48:51 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=mesmtp; t=1742834931; x= 1742921331; bh=lF1vQbYhC7z03t9swA1jPDh5ui888yfEaVvhX69Ujkg=; b=I d2OQobW0pODZ5jioUDXyegfe21v2xSLTAAeaxCHFf/y/IbJfmE+ZDKvI1FO9QpZz DB5A0VWAIWCX0PInnrclPRo/TESYHjdJZTEYvT0oDKnAsOLRX33aZidkiEo9NYez ElvC2cKLUP1AleKB8LYiAacwBv56zaTI6faxJnQgCA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t= 1742834931; x=1742921331; bh=lF1vQbYhC7z03t9swA1jPDh5ui888yfEaVv hX69Ujkg=; b=wPatQkmiqX4ga1RiSXbfpz9K378OSsYixSpMAiUfTqy7azJuTkq Jkklh3kRrpIZhJOVtWL5XV7Z/bKNC/raqODsc/FA/RY6fnFHGIVfKEx2cuaDOPjB loJYg0E5AGw569V6k2Yknd1x0RA7ewhEzLobo+HO10IrwZI7pVZ97GveKwrs5viq bKXc3qW6Jt8rJFcgCs6+A8/ApXR1DcbaYRP9/nBAine+bEnwWyMsGjpiPM1NLUd7 +xLI0AuHJbDM3Xj9Y26mplmU/kjiZqSBxySkPILznmKVsg+ZGj/ZLUMrCtXM5VQ7 V7xAIqVl78KCTZHDQpzj+HmcCDT2hrkNcgg== X-ME-Sender: <xms:84zhZ-iDux4X2qyFOUX1Yq-74h7Gw-534zs5zGM6aUBJMqy3DDwkug> <xme:84zhZ_C1L6C-yi8u-chO5FNRfU7nLBxByvvmIWltLmplfXT0Pw1CAGrj2CNlQ-Hgr dTWgepfdwbKUVyrYg> X-ME-Received: <xmr:84zhZ2FvZuKDwnVVZC3gD7v7nMmLetyzukb1rskMb_5Kshfnc6bpM4jjatFcdWRCGA_jUPQcwZb2gpBSCAf_TWIg> X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefvddrtddtgdduiedtfedtucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggv pdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhf fvvefukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfhrghmuhhlrghr ihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeite duheefkeeufeelgeduhfejgfelheefleeuhfeffffgueduleehvdejleeiteenucevlhhu shhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuh hlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedvpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdp rhgtphhtthhopegtohguvgesghhrvghghhhoghgrnhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopeejie egtdejseguvggssghughhsrdhgnhhurdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:84zhZ3T-_X2l6edaoZkQxPsv9QmMcPV8LdTvFwsGlfu8m9Ih9zVGhg> <xmx:84zhZ7xT9T6GqLD5q32CbvPbJUZjrTHaU2CvObYl44CPZQ1xTJPiIw> <xmx:84zhZ14r5vGbR-Vgohua32XtMPbURaoU9vsa_gYagAYxvk3-IL3kqw> <xmx:84zhZ4x8PLuSm6-FVLtxBhGXO8CpCVuM33KpWFbyooI0GOGWnguffw> <xmx:84zhZ2-cmBfbkVUuEYOOy46jJMkjuBQLY8jzsO-fCbrQ1g0uBs2M2llu> Feedback-ID: i819c4023:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 12:48:51 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 12:48:49 -0400 From: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> To: Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename the default branch Message-ID: <Z-GM8Vi4kPnHQtWC@HIDDEN> References: <d2db73de82bb7bb3a6589a4299287d02dc961c14.camel@HIDDEN> <547c549d-970e-4331-8944-dc7a79698426@HIDDEN> <87wmcm2sqc.fsf@HIDDEN> <49ba31a6-6f1d-4607-9169-95b7dc557cfb@HIDDEN> <871puq8hd8.fsf@HIDDEN> <738287cd-601e-482c-8af0-903381e38f3b@HIDDEN> <2445d6dff0a8edb8c00b30111a967c02c4da0987.camel@HIDDEN> <8ecbe54e-f305-43ed-91c5-9f4608ac083a@HIDDEN> <87h63imzli.fsf@HIDDEN> <CA+3U0ZnvNArEXDXewc8MSLthSRhwBHykWxZahTO+5CuZJ=WGqA@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <CA+3U0ZnvNArEXDXewc8MSLthSRhwBHykWxZahTO+5CuZJ=WGqA@HIDDEN> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 10:08:23AM -0400, Greg Hogan wrote: > We can more easily find consensus by saying less (the opposite of a > majoritarian system). That's a really interesting point that I've noticed intuitively, but hadn't ever identified explicitly.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Mar 2025 14:08:46 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Mar 24 10:08:45 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57243 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1twiTt-0004FU-Ku for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 10:08:45 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-x330.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::330]:50568) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <code@HIDDEN>) id 1twiTp-0004F8-7b for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 10:08:43 -0400 Received: by mail-ot1-x330.google.com with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-72bd5f25ea6so1108152a34.1 for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 07:08:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=greghogan-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1742825315; x=1743430115; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=WdGXf6+obG7hR9TNs6PoeoRF2NOKfzGC/rjNyi1kYy0=; b=RJZBYvnUGModRmKt2WkwEQf7ER9hLY611zeulXvmMiDKAH3lp16mteCht1kgteBZ6Q 4fmZRvwN6LgipNHw4zDSoIDgaC1z74mapnhkpb7N5FU8/tEbP3A7XV4gID8bjDxem/P/ 7F9raplSWyy3C1MLvYsszFAgt74Opz4J81zuMoin4iCTFiSdcsddFm9zmKmC7xPnbR8W AzOAp4IKtRuSVU7zOpt4oQmVsQujIctSdNCRc0HrVmPBdBxr7BkiHbvJltVf++rGdZ+j BQ7/84XJb84cX/ZklBfiK6cwTXH//wz6tN8gieMZeDiFh1nailH4gP4oddb/cLmACQWb WSbQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1742825315; x=1743430115; h=content-transfer-encoding:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=WdGXf6+obG7hR9TNs6PoeoRF2NOKfzGC/rjNyi1kYy0=; b=OWiURRemtGu+YhAX14tPGY6Ue3s6JzTuSSOsCkrWNhjw8U1SdV608W1QthtUthFuZI Q6704fVFyqyVjZn1wSscPXr3P205BSsTPIMkDEizWamV/P2Q/LyP+Msux5vqZpEvnrLS +NiZvJ1fAT6G0Q7RYcIS2mJnwPIBtKwgLI0liw7froTQergqAnxGAtAlE1proH/hCnMv x/jJWhQazKXorpvEIAX2OePLywaLWqJbehQlcS3N8kEaSYi6eLT8WjCtNrXXJo167oA3 idgmePI/HI4JkScYTtwuGtIIOZE1fI1K5S54qT7xNZqNe+8PErB9V29GWMpy+miek6eO I3KA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyWMVoINzk2p6XCtX62xvB1QVuVIGIYNExveKjDWOEO8JHQHEGx OYzWh/N0hXGxkuY6Lad5UqLAUmSxeyGs5CWlo03sq5eW45wcE81fEFjZF5ePJ5lMntOUPs5i+4s SjaUytQISpfgTe101203tlgWR2IlGFUOdCR3vBr4Y4UPF+8zg X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvZBD5wBHZFbRs1bNIkmgy6BPYkiB/nJGm6h23w2gG/Euia4FUD9wErRE0mLIL 0xl02rwjQBhH+nFa6CotVMq8fBxLKUKFJYhGiUc+JmzVzte6liCdRDupVctbkvF170WHkuV4HKE LVj46/op6FN7BqcoHx8qRZ/jmCRw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGrTJsekaNRs6fuSKlqh1lspWzad3AYiXhEYBBl2SYskA8PfWSIWZtEQiC4S3i/2Ygik84tw3ZxsbuISf3cYPc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:2a03:b0:72b:9df9:f7d1 with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-72c0af14956mr8960141a34.26.1742825314474; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 07:08:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <d835c85c709a393309e6cad4ab065d039f1e08af.camel@HIDDEN> <f072096c292546c760d1342aa7d4f6c950027da9.camel@HIDDEN> <87seocwh1p.fsf@HIDDEN> <87msej45ha.fsf@HIDDEN> <87wmdk8fpd.fsf@wireframe> <c2532d09-e54b-49fe-9ace-dca55239f394@HIDDEN> <d2db73de82bb7bb3a6589a4299287d02dc961c14.camel@HIDDEN> <547c549d-970e-4331-8944-dc7a79698426@HIDDEN> <87wmcm2sqc.fsf@HIDDEN> <49ba31a6-6f1d-4607-9169-95b7dc557cfb@HIDDEN> <871puq8hd8.fsf@HIDDEN> <738287cd-601e-482c-8af0-903381e38f3b@HIDDEN> <2445d6dff0a8edb8c00b30111a967c02c4da0987.camel@HIDDEN> <8ecbe54e-f305-43ed-91c5-9f4608ac083a@HIDDEN> <87h63imzli.fsf@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <87h63imzli.fsf@HIDDEN> From: Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 10:08:23 -0400 X-Gm-Features: AQ5f1JrDqpcv1MLwEjIZBaTrC8IlQ2C1UQl3JUrp2M8wIz8aLH_DBcJBPWfJfHo Message-ID: <CA+3U0ZnvNArEXDXewc8MSLthSRhwBHykWxZahTO+5CuZJ=WGqA@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename the default branch To: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 8:01=E2=80=AFAM Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmai= l.com> wrote: [...] > Making decision with consensus isn=E2=80=99t passive =E2=80=93 scanning t= he document and > then answering yes or no =E2=80=93 but consensus is active: Ask questions= and/or > Propose alternatives and/or Explain the rationale for the status quo. > > In this thread, are we working all together to build a consensus? Consensus on both the what and the *why*. We can more easily find consensus by saying less (the opposite of a majoritarian system).
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Mar 2025 12:00:40 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Mar 24 08:00:39 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54543 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1twgTv-0005cW-7m
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 08:00:39 -0400
Received: from mail-wm1-x32a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::32a]:55549)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>)
id 1twgRb-0005Of-N4
for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 07:58:16 -0400
Received: by mail-wm1-x32a.google.com with SMTP id
5b1f17b1804b1-43cf257158fso28245315e9.2
for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 04:58:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1742817489; x=1743422289; darn=debbugs.gnu.org;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references
:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
:reply-to; bh=fXJwzwgYFwzHA3OUt/vOShTdg1qFrcIlhZ1nzmzSis8=;
b=DqmQ2zwAgxFQMky7IwNv3DW8TJ2ESUju2EzIJfJbOo2tgg1oxZ2Cthwy7c9dwWoOJq
JGWfcOs7jadOqvrqyHcbqZoZo+FqApyLiXaVSmpmTrjqCdLvJ15Mvwk8O1oiSQDuPxty
GjMR+S0x5sKs1gxQV2ok0IobjsdG8EcHrhJ+3GCje6LVbYxxn/RmC+VG56egL7MQmFsS
YFBbgtGJXoxvT6xNkpFZRehADG4xxwv0a/jXQgmaVfKbFopGdBw2/Tv2amKjUBiAoLr/
pvqODoS7wtR1HjSYPM1fWV4eFAt9pvKht2OfZo/Hzo73Fx5mjBrM011av3V8cQvAfBKu
qwyA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1742817489; x=1743422289;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references
:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=fXJwzwgYFwzHA3OUt/vOShTdg1qFrcIlhZ1nzmzSis8=;
b=V6foxVUr8sWf1eHWtn50IZRMtxG12Xemxejt+EhhHCIi6szkWiFBhRoPfIw0hcb7Uv
Uj9W94L+7hpOnhZNxvSVSjumUXUmiD+1Vt+jHdnlhhykZHt62bFJoY3QPb6gNtMbKauL
2Ki+sbBXm1Z7bsE2HpgGi2Rt7EV/xfDVP+J1KFlm5ePtrgCdmFDzNyhgJZZySBmD3kLq
364d42MNpHybTcJ1HTcW7lRogs0KfAPH/ANlrYMMiPN3DtQJhelxQRgU9RASgYDwJicQ
3rrkiAaCk/yY+bcDTjLMR0HivJio9m2cjTKxGtrx/5JxrHMXKdeZhgv0DiuILzsj3rdF
3Guw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwX7tlw7+TEIra6rDPQ1ELC/TcnK6Vg+wjq+NXmWApPMRtfEsPc
4SFDnjVtyWOuxL6HzcQGb3SQCC50fFCDlWuWCV1tips6Sif6v8RcEa9v0Q==
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncs0CEojjGNJwK5+CdtkGcERLetdkCDHgsk/km3wxAaum2tGRiE237y3g4I8pSz
+IeZ2cIyVaDYFvPsAEtLnHXWnSSu45zP3QJLIbvMGwnwVZVHdMsGT4CWb/cWmxrJzxVjz5DifEl
BHSXZXAGmUyxzhe4gN0TGeyxAL01HZtqwoJ5VYCMt9d9jGSPjh+Gt0wSPkO2/l5NHxUvnSoNodN
mvCc24IoiKODatHWETAFj8ARTgJBGEjfqXcT8CJKgXkLLmUccTYoqCzX1PW/szpD7fyKUjiA7os
XwtEWjc9B7bt2S3JvjqdJwJQfwAIBvMUUFejQeOO71LNeyTyYRg7GS+hoQQ7p/YDAUk7qD2DFIR
6mhh76f5JEi8f0rRH+Nu7MHZj3pILmCvVVzoJ94cU
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGQVDh1zcba3XGgU+qpfblwLSfYj5XZUbtv/YnhfpaA/po5W25x6UqgbKR65rSi2zt6OpawrQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1913:b0:43d:649:4e50 with SMTP id
5b1f17b1804b1-43d509f67d4mr108446715e9.13.1742817489006;
Mon, 24 Mar 2025 04:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lili (roam-nat-fw-prg-194-254-61-47.net.univ-paris-diderot.fr.
[194.254.61.47]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
5b1f17b1804b1-43d42b8fcd4sm102935835e9.1.2025.03.24.04.58.08
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
Mon, 24 Mar 2025 04:58:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
To: Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN>, Liliana Marie Prikler
<liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>, Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=
<ludo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename the default branch
In-Reply-To: <8ecbe54e-f305-43ed-91c5-9f4608ac083a@HIDDEN>
References: <d835c85c709a393309e6cad4ab065d039f1e08af.camel@HIDDEN>
<f072096c292546c760d1342aa7d4f6c950027da9.camel@HIDDEN>
<87seocwh1p.fsf@HIDDEN> <87msej45ha.fsf@HIDDEN>
<87wmdk8fpd.fsf@wireframe>
<c2532d09-e54b-49fe-9ace-dca55239f394@HIDDEN>
<d2db73de82bb7bb3a6589a4299287d02dc961c14.camel@HIDDEN>
<547c549d-970e-4331-8944-dc7a79698426@HIDDEN>
<87wmcm2sqc.fsf@HIDDEN>
<49ba31a6-6f1d-4607-9169-95b7dc557cfb@HIDDEN>
<871puq8hd8.fsf@HIDDEN>
<738287cd-601e-482c-8af0-903381e38f3b@HIDDEN>
<2445d6dff0a8edb8c00b30111a967c02c4da0987.camel@HIDDEN>
<8ecbe54e-f305-43ed-91c5-9f4608ac083a@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 12:34:33 +0100
Message-ID: <87h63imzli.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407
Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
Hi all,
Sorry, I am missing something =E2=80=93 I=E2=80=99ve re-read all the thread=
. As Leo
pointed, are we building all together a consensus here? Reminder:
Contributors and even more so team members are expected to help bui=
ld
consensus. By using consensus, we are committed to finding solutio=
ns that
everyone can live with.
Thus, no decision is made against significant concerns; these conce=
rns are
actively resolved through counter proposals. A deliberating member
disapproving a proposal bears a responsibility for finding alternat=
ives,
proposing ideas or code, or explaining the rationale for the status=
quo.
Therefore, if some of us do not care to use master or main, then it
means some of us consent in one way or the other, no? That=E2=80=99s what =
I=E2=80=99m
missing, I guess.
Consent does not mean we are all convinced, neither we fully support,
neither we are deeply aligned, neither our own opinion reads =E2=80=9Cyeah =
this
change the best idea ever=E2=80=9D, etc. Consent means accepting another a=
ngle
than our own, one angle that I do not fully share but I can live with.
In full transparency, I sponsor the GCD but I do not support it: I agree
(consent) to change the branch name. Somehow, it removes me nothing
neither adds me something, and for the rest, I do not feel qualified
enough to publicly share a strong opinion. Ah, we are not yet in the
=E2=80=9CDeliberation Period=E2=80=9C. :-)
Hey, we are still in the =E2=80=9CDiscussion Period=E2=80=9D. :-)
In the =E2=80=9CDiscussion Period=E2=80=9D, the main rule is to listen the =
other points
of view and challenge our first impression or initial opinion. In other
words, we ask more explanations about some wording, we propose new
wordings, we ask more details about the motivation, etc. More
importantly, we challenge the technical bits.
And always being very specific with the GCD at hand.
Making decision with consensus isn=E2=80=99t passive =E2=80=93 scanning the=
document and
then answering yes or no =E2=80=93 but consensus is active: Ask questions a=
nd/or
Propose alternatives and/or Explain the rationale for the status quo.
In this thread, are we working all together to build a consensus?
Cheers,
simon
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Mar 2025 22:19:42 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 23 18:19:42 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52964 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1twTfS-0000Rd-AV for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 18:19:42 -0400 Received: from dane.soverin.net ([185.233.34.157]:41901) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ekaitz@HIDDEN>) id 1twTfN-0000RF-W9 for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 18:19:39 -0400 Received: from smtp.soverin.net (c04smtp-lb01.int.sover.in [10.10.4.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dane.soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ZLVwM3JpyzybK; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 22:19:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.soverin.net (smtp.soverin.net [10.10.4.99]) by soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4ZLVwL710Lz52; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 22:19:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.soverin.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=elenq.tech header.i=@elenq.tech header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=soverin1 header.b=wyrW4rDT; dkim-atps=neutral DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=elenq.tech; s=soverin1; t=1742768371; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=pCa6qAPXLbea2YvKXQEO5Ik3/N4sBTrNKcrCoz1kunY=; b=wyrW4rDTs8aazI/ppiSVL+18q8m+OP69HqMPrNN6ENvbjOgD28AY0ZxZ4/mvYOcet0FACy hxrLvBf23P76+asPsHMOXO6do9e4QFcTj1trasyX0lT38Nnn3lNgFJpVXD409DDix/mM6x BsY75UOZM7o7BWa9veOTQ7XNfR9Zw/KjQERtHP1cudAC5HnTd3nyzbc/wxwHoFHhZbb+jV pxnup7u//PfMxjBSiYF5/zw1X+S5OhqPEC3uErmeqhEJ6p3DNgA+mGMVwvxn7uq+rrVgme 3KmcfQPNJ3eB+Ryd3MYCdeuhP75X1ZFq8NJYMw6C2cXJZInYY05KyA8bc0MHZA== X-CM-Envelope: MS4xfF3UNV0iYmkJk4cLX76dAkrxKkc4eMCw03cEzXtPCKukekDC16kOZI7lqV6gIN5/qOxLmEZtmXf8Anl4opoZMcIORsXwZdncRBV9SILD/4ixwscpxWtD QtwRoo3ebLWR5dPdHmobPFCF1Czv0sDtaZgEDP3m6XGXxphPfmdHsSMF4so8Tg3KCBpCtXEosot5OXBrHExU6LSGWcs7zjvZlTw6V1nCQHg1wLAfMl6C8jw1 0Zz1wYeQvGMJdHp3CyX8oBZo9AMjWZNP4q8zLX78+jY= X-CM-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=I7afRMgg c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=67e088f3 a=GfXQuWAYjYMZp4ahSyumlQ==:117 a=GfXQuWAYjYMZp4ahSyumlQ==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=MKtGQD3n3ToA:10 a=1oJP67jkp3AA:10 a=tn0-D6YGRVVB5dVh-UAA:9 a=3ZKOabzyN94A:10 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=QYH75iMubAgA:10 a=yPy0HX4kI4LsAlP3oO-2:22 Message-ID: <c22df6b1-1589-4299-be75-29538ffbc4c7@HIDDEN> Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 23:19:30 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename the default branch To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>, Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>, =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> References: <d835c85c709a393309e6cad4ab065d039f1e08af.camel@HIDDEN> <f072096c292546c760d1342aa7d4f6c950027da9.camel@HIDDEN> <87seocwh1p.fsf@HIDDEN> <87msej45ha.fsf@HIDDEN> <87wmdk8fpd.fsf@wireframe> <c2532d09-e54b-49fe-9ace-dca55239f394@HIDDEN> <d2db73de82bb7bb3a6589a4299287d02dc961c14.camel@HIDDEN> <547c549d-970e-4331-8944-dc7a79698426@HIDDEN> <87wmcm2sqc.fsf@HIDDEN> <49ba31a6-6f1d-4607-9169-95b7dc557cfb@HIDDEN> <871puq8hd8.fsf@HIDDEN> <738287cd-601e-482c-8af0-903381e38f3b@HIDDEN> <2445d6dff0a8edb8c00b30111a967c02c4da0987.camel@HIDDEN> <8ecbe54e-f305-43ed-91c5-9f4608ac083a@HIDDEN> <826dd2289d6937443f0d83053a908ec38e0002bc.camel@HIDDEN> Content-Language: en-US, es-ES, eu From: Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN> Autocrypt: addr=ekaitz@HIDDEN; keydata= xsFNBGcvh/QBEACePF16wEeQaqfJNgeaSQB6ty6PzLaYtl8UVApPSCF1PYNEhDtxQOOpBXeu k6h68cjhRX7hmug8mAraXotw4aG4Z3kbUro4fzXOYW3rCi/mAm5NFXLUmBX3E1AV1pcD8hDA 5s3LeGzfTo4xRGTW4zTzxGEyrvbChkVib7wTSk52a/WkFas6l3sXnepF8HmIEOWkwQcYdcuo gaNDFP1kjZYvqfKJXmCZnY+lC8Zfe/vlD/x8FZQYBQ5xgXIfbSR0xlRz/XIHfJv6j+3myUUr 2UKMku1dkjlkhNkyfw+RypQzmbJ0oJ4bk76/ju0nnlN65/LvyeTVUh/2O2VnPnZ49keL8sqr APXF4di4pWT+/mPxfoEtiSDtjyzbr8+ajcwLa4SSKLlexqjZj8X6R4tt31Rf/Pliwe4TdPmd 2leE3BIJl9bAuslEvd5tqZ1oa3Zfb62tvpaJCRYMtOEWuGkYdyrwTW7UXJPQpam4X7WoW2jW c5aTpAnpnqIPzaWJmua1lGQjEXgt4xvVdhVmZq32fkTy/rXw9l5a+XU7N4/Zz8AR/0xO+UBc Q1J+wHADjL8Q0v0tZLEaiWL72AsxN3GMWNPXWAplaTPUNPUlNK0JPHwhTX/cQVkIc9avSKc3 BeUofC96d13I7QmRjQ0gcBaLtV9lMOuYwbC+6tb70x2fQsI3bwARAQABzSJFa2FpdHogWmFy cmFnYSA8ZWthaXR6QGVsZW5xLnRlY2g+wsGUBBMBCAA+FiEEXb4j05BTZSZ/jMdq/blSvT9z VtYFAmcvh/QCGwMFCQPCZwAFCwkIBwIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQ/blSvT9zVtbW CRAAkbla35s8RKhQBweqwEcdYDV2Zpt16OgENymjLs/qhh7Y9WgWZ0YraSNYDGCt6lemhior vrXX48+yZC98c8ZgCrr4Hmt8i/6TvJqVhwlZ9//3W/z/YuYDtUPBzRHgwM8tejiXmNqYM8lF Jg64pQaczmGAR29Xf0WTQegSociBSUg9eC7BS74Uh7UbHCgytyretoKmqJAp8SKE/Czt5x4R lXKVgGawzg1GerriwnNbudy0eyl1q0Pn7Q+K+tQ14EPDAM+QsGR/fBV4a3uYP6sBF+SdM+DO LX5MRVbWJ8O3kLmbAKQeLgSLlnYydMY/mTvjgxMAakfGCA4q69gmyDSB0fzAUm3c1JV5VwIo 63rykiOEB/k2m4aiiujH5kOC86sjb273+XXWlOhOEO/vKHHdAh+B7dnEEYUPXnUEMQ23PaF4 22u7C62kw3yH/krKr60t5FxcqNWtCOxEWc0WMZw12Q3Gw8+9oA5DI/f4gjlGvQiQWqj6dvoX vIDmifr0R3sTi6xh+udu2Rp8PsKOW8ZRyQ0/VOiwzBfQkf4PFowaiRp8LnkjLEVft6ruuA1h awO2SKKJ8WpgZPw5oMigZR5DgbunxMD4BcqmD7bSoTRV/ljx1I8UgAaQLPqVVnLt31iENtLv 43kPHl56AbYpAzcvf8nGU3KPhGOoByyuyph4RYDOwU0EZy+H9AEQANc9vw7DnBeNGKhq1Bg5 oiGII7npGXCChe7PB6CJjkvN6n1kXrvBYsaORXvZJPNgmBTKu/ETGYS0t0YeGlI4WTOK9dgB /7T8dngRmrGjPmZjryzfk18tXnJq0zoLixLizDT3FqV4jOG5KjPTxQvpdBMiX9oX4Je2OMqF d14fopLGav0rW7Fh5p83OSREpXbJUJJiUaH3p9U9Ss8IBHzr669PViAqe09EfxL/L0l1JIFj HQjJcg01PUXZAW6aPtd7q6eNCSLTXYPiDRQe2GdRUcB7WfqCogR/LEpzLLcd0NkxCnc0T6da rq2Dupt8rvQ95L4/cOGVcDUDOGE6U92XCkaCvUQkypxQCGKSEjbTFoLRG/4JQj0pAWSaqxPS 7hkTFql4qUAdRwzHN1ib6XedcFfqHSy2Mk5ttW8DaBGKhCm7Mn6+4smXENHSuQxCqHlCQ2m+ 9ogpbxavNVfAblE/ucxyfyo6FlDbGHEG3Yu5296kUPT7PqZLiR3KetMPJfCLY2jVPio3t4tD s7Sj41sG5aIwEApb0Zoz3bPBt5O5GUoPFnXyjO306WLxXrM2tjY38jwHxF1Qvs3HQTJgRei2 g3D3KiiR27cXXs/8lrr8tblr5J1tE4TaQCea5lDuEgTCDLnlcopoYcKpFAUBGQtzcNkudT9w sM2nf9y6INcUE3FlABEBAAHCwXwEGAEIACYWIQRdviPTkFNlJn+Mx2r9uVK9P3NW1gUCZy+H 9AIbDAUJA8JnAAAKCRD9uVK9P3NW1td1D/4xx8AbDKAKx9ezT6GdTZbK6FS66qRQCEzTa5MX ZCEogASOla71CB10l5fFtsRWCtNQLzmgwkFwhdxyjqendDgacc5v/71NBb5KpKni6wDJMeiG s3Lq3ZgWfHte3NZ99iSH+La3aBSFbCloJ/Yf/MJBkzrm1sTTKcgF9/i0pzkume5vtpKRDjjS z4abHu7qk4Sgi5gwWpoKFTT38q6nLP+9SUla3JJjNqU3gvn8kwv6KDMKc4marnSp/c+5O6E+ lNrxMdD0n8+io/Bf/UEI6BU8F7JshPq732bHN1NzUXvgMd4cNsAlvsWM8UCKZ4/usFl1euMM FOvnadZinsTHpXhahJzkYWA7nAKbCoNNq9LPtWxfjHsIfhs+QQafF31Pw+jqHqruB4tH0eiL abrz7kejaZvJdVipNIzRUWYnpP+18khep2UtT1n9VNs6QNb4cHPsoe+s4ga4ZK/klCdEhLya XtbcaNEHb7NZUOBj3HhKFgIY8PD1AptAObHjsUNF5+jfEnl+5WjwyTZTIgDRiOrwn8LWOANQ 0JpR69t06uJwmiogQgnlYe36YFaauHGQZFa+L+R2zgnGn8TnR4C3tH7gNAef9+PKqgmJT5pN IkFzlDmZi05E9xzhj4WQ/OOsqU64eHL2PaDk+2TdfrzNwNFbkABJ+C7BHNAytQ6h9cpUbg== In-Reply-To: <826dd2289d6937443f0d83053a908ec38e0002bc.camel@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spampanel-Class: ham X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Liliana, I told you what I believed, and I'll continue to do so, but I didn't I make any comment in bad faith and hurting you has never been my intention. I know you know that, even if we disagree. I understand that we all got defensive, but that doesn't make comments in bad faith acceptable, so if you got some I'm sorry. Those should be reported. On 2025-03-23 22:47, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: > I'm part of what makes Guix diverse 😉 We all are.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Mar 2025 21:47:58 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 23 17:47:58 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52906 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1twTAj-0007Md-5U for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 17:47:58 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x341.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::341]:47394) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>) id 1twTAf-0007MN-8i for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 17:47:55 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-x341.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-43cf034d4abso41182975e9.3 for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 14:47:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1742766467; x=1743371267; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=qOhFADyubiEjC+ugFxYQApUkyznvHdGXNiFuaaCutwg=; b=de7RTN0++p5rO03yIJgKaRhTXGIEWhFXj2eHYoZ1p6X3gPX3upUsPQplB6lr9Gdy+s Vdrd9Jx4+cnfbel01xt4KE1GAx9cHBfxpl2wcxz45mA26GMrcV+mOy8vWOjDbUGpDfJR ay+pSIBz8kvTEflmzkxfWE7RN9tBJnuQ5oT5+ujPdIwelL9+dIrJnoR42Heei8UpdwlA nOmjYky1PbFTld4pin1Aj+Z61AnZFmMVqAxF88bosbe+UQdLCWl7XqoVu1NEzM1ntWcM /FvvKmKN6XDbsSzXvx6f8UBTDvMtiZhMg+77ahg1qpRnl6gqQFUiuk3I4oGtUlsixjIJ 12Fw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1742766467; x=1743371267; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=qOhFADyubiEjC+ugFxYQApUkyznvHdGXNiFuaaCutwg=; b=DFEk18eKsV8ebyA0CKejtpNv8uV2vt36VvgKfhUsOLYgNBFUlRx8LfUEl2BD2NcPGi RMPCMVExR3428E8qZYfKt6In4Y9aiNrZNdSvzP3oMKxD0f/EFbgeXjckSVsc+yVWwVtn Mnu77D0q0QhxQITqr69W6htV3qGXruprEx7bDum5x5FAck+sK8aNVUfZnl0rQMYw6w9B GIMAuQ1cVuIjOFdkIQD2dc6znE/l8Ydi0F0TaC1wpu/q+XCf9Udpzvu599QxIqIe0tCQ VURIfUtFqHQAH0nNWJ9ijRlnnuiT+m4huVag4Pt4J8gmgExD8YIaQuaYUlpqLq+c4iEb 7S4g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxZVs2xe6RRMJDYbJA96msdp96hnHPTB+0Krk4YatkuUp0SA9xN vCp/YgqUVkAlNe8jAUjizVW/SErXh3tKh1M+D4nh9GlZtvtulP8K X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuFuGSKia/V4AIea7u9vuEPOe4MPJCR4fOhdNkKQYu3IP179zwEU46DNpiYOw5 zs40Cq9tzWy2zco4eoIqLMsijRVxPK/cZ55WtdmFh0CZrHKFqo+pvEY6EDDqsKvdGfj1jiQ6USX 7q7347eidNC+dKlu2Xjjy5jFuVFvcjj6v9CXuQFDiwE5BOcDJqk9F38/qFHcnbAQiOB+JyMoyvg 4B2GE9lc54XWZzcNpPPaEfhgMfEg12Alna7z/CSeYk2SsTmwqk2ikJTGlGtXzum9e+raOvME3DN kxrsxTXlpWPW0lrecpD7seYD1GMWBd7hNfhvUxfpEoo5bsTuHEJkyW6Z+VL7EJc2OFtwZZ2MFUv +S8vXyn5gTvkfomTYDQsD X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGt3/QfM3rUvtgDPUbmwa7+MfqamKvxrXM3KYg0NJtkx1qKB9CrCHzm01oZZV57j/3PIT+PHQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:b8d:b0:43b:ce08:c382 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-43d509f6797mr105333295e9.16.1742766466808; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 14:47:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lumine.fritz.box (85-127-114-32.dsl.dynamic.surfer.at. [85.127.114.32]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-43d440ed4cbsm151286095e9.34.2025.03.23.14.47.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 23 Mar 2025 14:47:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <826dd2289d6937443f0d83053a908ec38e0002bc.camel@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename the default branch From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> To: Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN>, Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>, Ludovic =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 22:47:44 +0100 In-Reply-To: <8ecbe54e-f305-43ed-91c5-9f4608ac083a@HIDDEN> References: <d835c85c709a393309e6cad4ab065d039f1e08af.camel@HIDDEN> <f072096c292546c760d1342aa7d4f6c950027da9.camel@HIDDEN> <87seocwh1p.fsf@HIDDEN> <87msej45ha.fsf@HIDDEN> <87wmdk8fpd.fsf@wireframe> <c2532d09-e54b-49fe-9ace-dca55239f394@HIDDEN> <d2db73de82bb7bb3a6589a4299287d02dc961c14.camel@HIDDEN> <547c549d-970e-4331-8944-dc7a79698426@HIDDEN> <87wmcm2sqc.fsf@HIDDEN> <49ba31a6-6f1d-4607-9169-95b7dc557cfb@HIDDEN> <871puq8hd8.fsf@HIDDEN> <738287cd-601e-482c-8af0-903381e38f3b@HIDDEN> <2445d6dff0a8edb8c00b30111a967c02c4da0987.camel@HIDDEN> <8ecbe54e-f305-43ed-91c5-9f4608ac083a@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.54.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Am Sonntag, dem 23.03.2025 um 19:43 +0100 schrieb Ekaitz Zarraga: > Sadly, there's more than a 10% of population in the world (probably > more around a 60% or so) that think trans people don't exist and are > offended by them. Does that mean they are right? Does it mean we > should please them, removing all references to trans people from the > world? It is funny that you'd suggest that =E2=80=93 not sincerely, I know =E2=80= =93 given that it's exactly what is currently happening in the US. Yet, I think that no one would suggest in honest, and that Guix would resist such an attempt at othering our trans comrades. > I say it is related with the US because this originated on a campaign > by an US corporation that exported the US thinking of trying to > comfort others, censor swear words in tv and so on. I could talk for > long about why that is related to their religion and so on... To my knowledge, the change in Git was initiated by SF Conservancy, which is indeed a US nonprofit. That being said, merely being based in the US is not yet a reason to disregard their opinion =E2=80=93 I think I'v= e already outlined that before. Both FSF and GNU were started in the US too, without them we'd have considerably less free software (regardless of anyone's opinion on RMS, might I add). > In any case, the point here is we should choose our fate. They > imposed enough things on us, like the language, and we should now > just apply this change because some US corporation lobbied for it and > made some people think there was anything wrong with one specific > word of the dictionary. You chose to follow them, and I chose to > reject it. I agree with the first sentence of this paragraph. I don't think that keeping master because someone way back when decided that that was a good name is much of "choosing our fate", though. If anything, had people accepted the status quo all the way down, we'd still use SVN and 'trunk' :) > (Some had already shared their concerns about Guix's pronunciation, > are we also open to change the project's name?) Maybe, maybe not. If folks wanted a rebrand, because they don't like the sound of Guix or think it has been forever tainted by the whole GuixSD thing that is woefully outdated yet still being used, I could see myself supporting that. I could not currently come up with a punny French name myself, though, and I don't think this is a concern for many Guix at the moment. >=20 > I understand that you can *prefer* something else. I also prefer to > talk in spanish and here we are. If I knew german, I would be happy > to talk to you in german if we both agreed to it in those terms: > preference. >=20 > If you told me that speaking in any other language than german could=20 > offend people or hurt them I would reject your arguments, which is > what I'm doing here. >=20 > I don't care to use master, main, guix, or anything else. That's not > the problem I'm pointing to. >=20 > Maybe the GDC should be called: Let's change the branch name to=20 > something I like more. It would be fairer that way, but it may have > more risk to be rejected. Speaking to people in languages other than German can, actually, depending on the context, hurt them. Now, we are not in such a context and I think we are all fine with using English as a language to communicate our GCDs in =E2=80=93 which to be fair, isn't perfect either, a= nd for tech support and other things it's often more helpful to use folks' first languages, but I don't think we could seriously consider the alternative of translating those documents into all languages used by contributors with the current number of people contributing towards them. Now, I will take you by your word and assume you'd agree with me if this was merely about a choice of preference. Which, to be fair, as long as we choose from a pool of harmless choices, it is. The matter still remains, that the currently used 'master' is not eligible per that criterion as even in the face of some token black people declaring it not an issue, it remains demonstrably offensive for the reasons pointed out. > >=20 > > Which of these mails [2,3] called others fascist?=C2=A0 Do feel free to > > point out ones that don't appear in either query and quote them. >=20 > You told me to educate myself in "far-right dog-whistles" implying=20 > another person was using them, and thus implying they were far-right=20 > extremists. Maybe I took it too seriously. >=20 > (Also that person had called the proposal "woke" and I don't like > that framing either) I used the word "right-wing dogwhistles", but fair enough. I can assure you that the person in question was indeed using said dog whistles (of the American right as well) =E2=80=93 whether they were aware = of it or not.=C2=B9 And mind you, I was not defending myself here, but responding to you dismissing someone else's observation that their comment had indeed been dismissive. To be completely honest, this entire exchange read like the age old script of some right winger making an extremely unhinged take and being called out on it, before a free speech absolutist steps in to defend them. And to continue, your response to that felt like you were more concerned with their right to be right winger, having already determined they are one, than the sensibilities of any minority under the threat of right wing rhetoric and/or action. You told me back than that you were drained by the discussion, that I made you feel unwelcome and that I've been gaslighting you. So let me tell you: your comment was not even the worst I received for making that suggestion. And that's just talking for myself. People have been made to feel quite uncomfortable by the "actually, master is fine" crowd. So yeah, please understand that folks are a little on edge, and don't be surprised when no one's typing "I'm black and I feel offended by the name 'master'" in the comments. > Well, the explanation is quite vague, and does not include possible=20 > drawbacks like the social price we are paying for it. Some may think=20 > that's because you were wiling to pay it. >=20 > In the document I read "may be perceived as harmful" or "that spring > to mind more easily" but both are vague suggestions of a possible > harm. Nothing that actually exists. >=20 > Every word may be perceived as harmful. >=20 > People that supports your proposal do it for preference, but not > because they are actually hurt by the word "master". It is fine, > though. I think the social price we pay is rather small in this instance, particularly as we aim to cater towards our own group of contributors. We did see some not-so-nice sides of folks lurking around Guix surface, though, I'll grant you that. > >=20 > I think, this original let's rename the branches idea gained traction > in the last years because it creates some social division where > people could just check the default branch name of software projects > to see if they were more left or right leaning and I don't like that. > That's why I don't like it being applied here. >=20 > Oftentimes this kind of proposals are made to stretch the project's=20 > social structure and try to find holes. I mean, it helps that they become vehicles for folks to scream DEI and woke at the mere suggestion, but apart from those deliberate interruptions, I do think we can be reasonable people and collectively choose a colour for our bikeshed :) > We did have a similar episode with a patch being sent to the CoC for=20 > good initial reasons but what happened to be a person that claimed > that trans women could not be considered women. I didn't read his > intentions very well at the beginning, but if I'm not mistaken, you > did. I do remember that episode. The "good initial reasons" were actually a smoke screen because they failed to get their changes adopted upstream. That is quite a different matter than what we're currently discussing, because "upstream" (Git) already supports free choice of a default branch name and we're not (yet) making use of that feature. > > > 6. I think the initial goal for the proposal was actually to look > > > for confrontation. > > Believe it or not, I actually was not prepared for the backlash I > > received.=C2=A0 I actually thought this would be a straight-forward > > change to implement given the values that folks here share, and I'm > > not happy to be proven wrong on that. >=20 > Well, what happened here is what triggered my reserves since the very > beginning, and I think I told you in the previous thread. >=20 > You underestimated how diverse Guix is. Guix has people from all over > the globe, and it shouldn't surprise you that many people here were > not affected by the original push for the branch rename as much as > you were. You make me sound like a villain whose evil plot is being foiled. Let me remind you that I'm part of what makes Guix diverse ;) > When I took part in the discussion it wasn't only in my name. Surely > I could be more precise on it, but I tried to make you understand > that those things that we consider superobvious (master might be > offensive -> we change it) might not be so obvious to others, and we > might pay a social price for discussing them in the terms you did. Now, I'm aware that it might not be super obvious to everyone, but I did kinda expect most Guix to have a basic amount of empathy with those who are affected by such "trivial" things as branch names. They did put in the effort to fight on everyone's behalf to make the default configurable, after all. > In a previous email I asked what would happen if we started a > discussion about putting a "free palestine" label in the Guix > website. Many software projects did that (also with Ukranian flags). > The problem here is also related with what Ludovic mentioned: he > changed the branch name in the shepherd without any hassle. He surely > could put the "free palestine" label in the Shepherd website easily. > But Guix is a global project, and thinking such a proposal would not=20 > have any backlash is very naive. >=20 > That's why I think we should refrain from trying this kind of "very=20 > obvious" changes that are really rooted in our political views. We > might be asking for too much for such a diverse group of people. I think we could discuss at lengths about flags on web pages, but we should take that part of the discussion off-list as off-topic. For now, let me just agree that putting a flag on some web appearance is pretty low effort for no serious gain; especially if such efforts are not backed by a more serious commitment towards a cause. I do however think that changing our default branch name is very much in line with our overall values, not just a bit to score Internet brownie points, and that we can be a guide to other projects somewhat married to Git attempting to do the same. And to be sure: we've already committed to the change where it was trivial, so let's follow through on the repositories where there's a small technological hurdle to overcome.=C2=B2 Cheers =C2=B9 The purpose of dogwhistling is partly to mark one's intent while blending in a larger crowd oblivious to the meaning behind the phrases they use. =C2=B2 I'm aware that this could alternatively read like a sunk cost fallacy, but I mean this more in the "practice what we preach" sense.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Mar 2025 18:54:04 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 23 14:54:04 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52650 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1twQSS-0004PF-17
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 14:54:04 -0400
Received: from wolfsden.cz ([37.205.8.62]:58524)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <~@wolfsden.cz>) id 1twQSO-0004On-KZ
for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 14:54:02 -0400
Received: by wolfsden.cz (Postfix, from userid 104)
id 5631038374A; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 18:53:58 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=wolfsden.cz; s=mail;
t=1742756038; bh=qmkZmpXjfhMfIbkW63Aj+jlEomYfjfrnKYJ4Lj2ohGE=;
h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date;
b=CB1hiAyOwrInQwDtXIcZLFeiSwDeW6+UM1RwvtO2fNdI+cLKOPPFOWJ6bDelv+TRg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X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on wolfsden
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,
DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,URIBL_BLOCKED
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Received: from localhost (unknown [128.0.188.242])
by wolfsden.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 74633384AE9;
Sun, 23 Mar 2025 18:53:57 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=wolfsden.cz; s=mail;
t=1742756037; bh=qmkZmpXjfhMfIbkW63Aj+jlEomYfjfrnKYJ4Lj2ohGE=;
h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date;
b=pSpYJyjAj+KwQefr+kE0BJ1Oeej4tbE7GtSNuWZgWQ72GLsvZ3a/MKkT5l78gGugp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From: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] A better name for the default branch
In-Reply-To: <87iko03uzg.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=
=?utf-8?Q?=22's?= message of "Sun, 23 Mar 2025 11:24:35 +0100")
References: <87seocwh1p.fsf@HIDDEN> <87msej45ha.fsf@HIDDEN>
<87wmdk8fpd.fsf@wireframe>
<c2532d09-e54b-49fe-9ace-dca55239f394@HIDDEN>
<d2db73de82bb7bb3a6589a4299287d02dc961c14.camel@HIDDEN>
<547c549d-970e-4331-8944-dc7a79698426@HIDDEN>
<87wmcm2sqc.fsf@HIDDEN>
<49ba31a6-6f1d-4607-9169-95b7dc557cfb@HIDDEN>
<871puq8hd8.fsf@HIDDEN>
<738287cd-601e-482c-8af0-903381e38f3b@HIDDEN>
<Z95BAoXPTySMg6lx@HIDDEN> <87iko03uzg.fsf_-_@HIDDEN>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 19:53:57 +0100
Message-ID: <87y0wv7f3u.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407
Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN>,
Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@HIDDEN> writes:
> Hello,
>
> Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> skribis:
>
>> I think I share Simon's point of view on this proposal. I'm basically
>> indifferent about the outcome of the proposal. I'd want to see a group
>> effort on enumerating, testing, and solving the technical challenges
>> before we make the change. There has been some discussion about that. I
>> think we should be careful about the technical stuff.
>
> I agree. It seems to me that the document proposes something doable and
> reasonable technically, but having more eyeballs would help find
> omissions or potential issues.
>
> FWIW I renamed the default branch of a few repositories over the past
> few years, notably Cuirass and Shepherd; it was rather friction-less but
> of course these are smaller repos with fewer contributors.
Coincidentally, guix-cuirass and shepherd are the only two repositories
I mirror that have the wrong default branch in my cgit instance. Now I
know why, I have probably started mirroring before this change was done
and have missed the announcement about the change. I should figure out
how to fix it...
Tomas
--=20
There are only two hard things in Computer Science:
cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Mar 2025 18:43:32 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 23 14:43:32 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52622 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1twQIF-0003sV-Mb for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 14:43:32 -0400 Received: from dane.soverin.net ([185.233.34.24]:51369) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ekaitz@HIDDEN>) id 1twQIB-0003sF-TK for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 14:43:29 -0400 Received: from smtp.soverin.net (c04smtp-lb01.int.sover.in [10.10.4.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dane.soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ZLQ6x2J23zyVy; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 18:43:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.soverin.net (smtp.soverin.net [10.10.4.99]) by soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4ZLQ6w5BVvz52; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 18:43:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.soverin.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=elenq.tech header.i=@elenq.tech header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=soverin1 header.b=i3BBsDOj; dkim-atps=neutral DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=elenq.tech; s=soverin1; t=1742755401; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=aukXaf5kAivj/XFvlxO/ntdGk6xTUWThQoEp41WMVbI=; b=i3BBsDOjna2TlZ8CX7vDtfHB0D6cIrPY6tpKA+04Q4cwnL5loy9U0sObPREUvAkYn5VyxN eeY6PBKBfRv4Bc4m6SGgrFzSn70/J1h6mLma5SggNF0KqO1J5CrOYAUb2Dp8ncd+G0qFeq V0tNR0GVVJRgso2EvjKKksnsfM5iNYgtMM322klKqF9i/Y9ALMtG+meoqFwJqn37IfToxd 7UYy8+A4pOow+nDwPFlAfzQowgl7imssvq9+AP4X/V6Y/n5yiL2/kRqQr0hg+s2nm1aT3g 4ifQeyvDtDbXJnHWDv5kZRreQe3zhMJImPEAEQGgkLobxV8LSAOt9e69TOlUJQ== X-CM-Envelope: MS4xfIMAh7S117ASTJyuGiBDQGI2UvW1U0FCZOnNpMRR5YvEAuAvQKctuoibSFNLgIQamg+yYjTk3Jfht58GmL8KijFmzS69soMpprmeLITLmoomVsnp3+UA Zohpz1LZh6rqYBdLtASgYUOfN/occif1BCWrk9Dv3gEX3+cbqSJJGLsI8gD//TvPN5hMbqzTS3j9E6F0JTO4cEBe1YfJBycjA2WE7aljl83oWtAz9pgIL5Pl eD7aO9ita3BaOny2l73r8KC7BbM1RinI6B3idyyKexU= X-CM-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=UsCZN/wB c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=67e05649 a=GfXQuWAYjYMZp4ahSyumlQ==:117 a=GfXQuWAYjYMZp4ahSyumlQ==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=MKtGQD3n3ToA:10 a=1oJP67jkp3AA:10 a=PjuYqXk4AAAA:8 a=b70gqUSrAAAA:8 a=08KIBUNhUCcKoSTSYI0A:9 a=3ZKOabzyN94A:10 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=ja02M9e7CsVl6cJUtNH0:22 a=yPy0HX4kI4LsAlP3oO-2:22 Message-ID: <8ecbe54e-f305-43ed-91c5-9f4608ac083a@HIDDEN> Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 19:43:20 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename the default branch To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>, Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>, =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> References: <d835c85c709a393309e6cad4ab065d039f1e08af.camel@HIDDEN> <f072096c292546c760d1342aa7d4f6c950027da9.camel@HIDDEN> <87seocwh1p.fsf@HIDDEN> <87msej45ha.fsf@HIDDEN> <87wmdk8fpd.fsf@wireframe> <c2532d09-e54b-49fe-9ace-dca55239f394@HIDDEN> <d2db73de82bb7bb3a6589a4299287d02dc961c14.camel@HIDDEN> <547c549d-970e-4331-8944-dc7a79698426@HIDDEN> <87wmcm2sqc.fsf@HIDDEN> <49ba31a6-6f1d-4607-9169-95b7dc557cfb@HIDDEN> <871puq8hd8.fsf@HIDDEN> <738287cd-601e-482c-8af0-903381e38f3b@HIDDEN> <2445d6dff0a8edb8c00b30111a967c02c4da0987.camel@HIDDEN> Content-Language: en-US, es-ES, eu From: Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN> Autocrypt: addr=ekaitz@HIDDEN; keydata= xsFNBGcvh/QBEACePF16wEeQaqfJNgeaSQB6ty6PzLaYtl8UVApPSCF1PYNEhDtxQOOpBXeu k6h68cjhRX7hmug8mAraXotw4aG4Z3kbUro4fzXOYW3rCi/mAm5NFXLUmBX3E1AV1pcD8hDA 5s3LeGzfTo4xRGTW4zTzxGEyrvbChkVib7wTSk52a/WkFas6l3sXnepF8HmIEOWkwQcYdcuo gaNDFP1kjZYvqfKJXmCZnY+lC8Zfe/vlD/x8FZQYBQ5xgXIfbSR0xlRz/XIHfJv6j+3myUUr 2UKMku1dkjlkhNkyfw+RypQzmbJ0oJ4bk76/ju0nnlN65/LvyeTVUh/2O2VnPnZ49keL8sqr APXF4di4pWT+/mPxfoEtiSDtjyzbr8+ajcwLa4SSKLlexqjZj8X6R4tt31Rf/Pliwe4TdPmd 2leE3BIJl9bAuslEvd5tqZ1oa3Zfb62tvpaJCRYMtOEWuGkYdyrwTW7UXJPQpam4X7WoW2jW c5aTpAnpnqIPzaWJmua1lGQjEXgt4xvVdhVmZq32fkTy/rXw9l5a+XU7N4/Zz8AR/0xO+UBc Q1J+wHADjL8Q0v0tZLEaiWL72AsxN3GMWNPXWAplaTPUNPUlNK0JPHwhTX/cQVkIc9avSKc3 BeUofC96d13I7QmRjQ0gcBaLtV9lMOuYwbC+6tb70x2fQsI3bwARAQABzSJFa2FpdHogWmFy cmFnYSA8ZWthaXR6QGVsZW5xLnRlY2g+wsGUBBMBCAA+FiEEXb4j05BTZSZ/jMdq/blSvT9z VtYFAmcvh/QCGwMFCQPCZwAFCwkIBwIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQ/blSvT9zVtbW CRAAkbla35s8RKhQBweqwEcdYDV2Zpt16OgENymjLs/qhh7Y9WgWZ0YraSNYDGCt6lemhior vrXX48+yZC98c8ZgCrr4Hmt8i/6TvJqVhwlZ9//3W/z/YuYDtUPBzRHgwM8tejiXmNqYM8lF Jg64pQaczmGAR29Xf0WTQegSociBSUg9eC7BS74Uh7UbHCgytyretoKmqJAp8SKE/Czt5x4R lXKVgGawzg1GerriwnNbudy0eyl1q0Pn7Q+K+tQ14EPDAM+QsGR/fBV4a3uYP6sBF+SdM+DO LX5MRVbWJ8O3kLmbAKQeLgSLlnYydMY/mTvjgxMAakfGCA4q69gmyDSB0fzAUm3c1JV5VwIo 63rykiOEB/k2m4aiiujH5kOC86sjb273+XXWlOhOEO/vKHHdAh+B7dnEEYUPXnUEMQ23PaF4 22u7C62kw3yH/krKr60t5FxcqNWtCOxEWc0WMZw12Q3Gw8+9oA5DI/f4gjlGvQiQWqj6dvoX vIDmifr0R3sTi6xh+udu2Rp8PsKOW8ZRyQ0/VOiwzBfQkf4PFowaiRp8LnkjLEVft6ruuA1h awO2SKKJ8WpgZPw5oMigZR5DgbunxMD4BcqmD7bSoTRV/ljx1I8UgAaQLPqVVnLt31iENtLv 43kPHl56AbYpAzcvf8nGU3KPhGOoByyuyph4RYDOwU0EZy+H9AEQANc9vw7DnBeNGKhq1Bg5 oiGII7npGXCChe7PB6CJjkvN6n1kXrvBYsaORXvZJPNgmBTKu/ETGYS0t0YeGlI4WTOK9dgB /7T8dngRmrGjPmZjryzfk18tXnJq0zoLixLizDT3FqV4jOG5KjPTxQvpdBMiX9oX4Je2OMqF d14fopLGav0rW7Fh5p83OSREpXbJUJJiUaH3p9U9Ss8IBHzr669PViAqe09EfxL/L0l1JIFj HQjJcg01PUXZAW6aPtd7q6eNCSLTXYPiDRQe2GdRUcB7WfqCogR/LEpzLLcd0NkxCnc0T6da rq2Dupt8rvQ95L4/cOGVcDUDOGE6U92XCkaCvUQkypxQCGKSEjbTFoLRG/4JQj0pAWSaqxPS 7hkTFql4qUAdRwzHN1ib6XedcFfqHSy2Mk5ttW8DaBGKhCm7Mn6+4smXENHSuQxCqHlCQ2m+ 9ogpbxavNVfAblE/ucxyfyo6FlDbGHEG3Yu5296kUPT7PqZLiR3KetMPJfCLY2jVPio3t4tD s7Sj41sG5aIwEApb0Zoz3bPBt5O5GUoPFnXyjO306WLxXrM2tjY38jwHxF1Qvs3HQTJgRei2 g3D3KiiR27cXXs/8lrr8tblr5J1tE4TaQCea5lDuEgTCDLnlcopoYcKpFAUBGQtzcNkudT9w sM2nf9y6INcUE3FlABEBAAHCwXwEGAEIACYWIQRdviPTkFNlJn+Mx2r9uVK9P3NW1gUCZy+H 9AIbDAUJA8JnAAAKCRD9uVK9P3NW1td1D/4xx8AbDKAKx9ezT6GdTZbK6FS66qRQCEzTa5MX ZCEogASOla71CB10l5fFtsRWCtNQLzmgwkFwhdxyjqendDgacc5v/71NBb5KpKni6wDJMeiG s3Lq3ZgWfHte3NZ99iSH+La3aBSFbCloJ/Yf/MJBkzrm1sTTKcgF9/i0pzkume5vtpKRDjjS z4abHu7qk4Sgi5gwWpoKFTT38q6nLP+9SUla3JJjNqU3gvn8kwv6KDMKc4marnSp/c+5O6E+ lNrxMdD0n8+io/Bf/UEI6BU8F7JshPq732bHN1NzUXvgMd4cNsAlvsWM8UCKZ4/usFl1euMM FOvnadZinsTHpXhahJzkYWA7nAKbCoNNq9LPtWxfjHsIfhs+QQafF31Pw+jqHqruB4tH0eiL abrz7kejaZvJdVipNIzRUWYnpP+18khep2UtT1n9VNs6QNb4cHPsoe+s4ga4ZK/klCdEhLya XtbcaNEHb7NZUOBj3HhKFgIY8PD1AptAObHjsUNF5+jfEnl+5WjwyTZTIgDRiOrwn8LWOANQ 0JpR69t06uJwmiogQgnlYe36YFaauHGQZFa+L+R2zgnGn8TnR4C3tH7gNAef9+PKqgmJT5pN IkFzlDmZi05E9xzhj4WQ/OOsqU64eHL2PaDk+2TdfrzNwNFbkABJ+C7BHNAytQ6h9cpUbg== In-Reply-To: <2445d6dff0a8edb8c00b30111a967c02c4da0987.camel@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spampanel-Class: ham X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hi On 2025-03-23 17:47, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: >> The interesting way you are putting it is like you are trying to make >> me think my opinion or feelings are not that important, which is >> exactly my point against the change. I still didn't get any real >> person telling me they are hurt by the word 'master'. > What Simon is actually trying to achieve is to tell you that your > opinion is not *the only one* that matters. It may well be, that > everyone who thus far told you they are hurt by the word 'master' are > actually bots (beep boop) and/or engaging in US imperialism. But there > also exists a chance that you have thus far merely avoided – > deliberately or otherwise – any real person who could convince you that > it's hurtful. > Let's take a survey to get some actual numbers. According to [1], > master appears inoffensive to about 80% of people and offensive to less > than 10%, with the rest abstaining. Clearly, this must mean that > branch naming is a non-issue, right? Right? Sadly, it's not that > simple. For if you take a moment to consider that these people _are > real_ and they feel offended by the word master, perhaps there is > something offensive about it. This is not as a solid argument as you think. The survey was done years after the renaming campaign started, letting the idea of "master is bad" sink, the amount of people that took part is too low, and reddit is a biased community. Still, it only got a 10%. And the first comment in the thread, that has hundreds of upvotes says: "I am a black man and have no issue with the word "master" in the context of git branches. I am intelligent enough to know the difference between an electronic hierarchy and human suffrage and racism." On the other hand, the fact that some people is offended by something doesn't mean that thing is offensive. You can get offense on anything in the world, that doesn't mean you are right. Sadly, there's more than a 10% of population in the world (probably more around a 60% or so) that think trans people don't exist and are offended by them. Does that mean they are right? Does it mean we should please them, removing all references to trans people from the world? >> I'm "hurt" by this because this is the result of US American (moral) >> imperialism at work, and I reject it, as a citizen of the world. > Changes happen. Even if this were the result of US imperialism – which > for the record you keep postulating without evidence; at least as far > as I can see – you would have to find a way of dealing with it. Now, > you can choose to ignore that Git allows you to change the default > branch name and reject any proposal to do so, but I think not everyone > will do the same. I say it is related with the US because this originated on a campaign by an US corporation that exported the US thinking of trying to comfort others, censor swear words in tv and so on. I could talk for long about why that is related to their religion and so on... In any case, the point here is we should choose our fate. They imposed enough things on us, like the language, and we should now just apply this change because some US corporation lobbied for it and made some people think there was anything wrong with one specific word of the dictionary. You chose to follow them, and I chose to reject it. (Some had already shared their concerns about Guix's pronunciation, are we also open to change the project's name?) > As for only pleasing imaginary people, have you stopped to consider > that those in favour of the change could be real people and not > displeased by the change? Because it could just so happen to be that > some folks would prefer another name over master. Personally, I'm one > of them. I would feel quite happy with 'main' or 'trunk'; even > 'stable' if we could make that guarantee. Now, I am aware, that this > is all a preference and to an extent de gustibus, but I think we can > come to a shared preference that maximizes happiness and minimizes harm > for Guix contributors. I understand that you can *prefer* something else. I also prefer to talk in spanish and here we are. If I knew german, I would be happy to talk to you in german if we both agreed to it in those terms: preference. If you told me that speaking in any other language than german could offend people or hurt them I would reject your arguments, which is what I'm doing here. I don't care to use master, main, guix, or anything else. That's not the problem I'm pointing to. Maybe the GDC should be called: Let's change the branch name to something I like more. It would be fairer that way, but it may have more risk to be rejected. >> This discussion has been just some people agreeing and >> not explaining while they called others fascists or told them they >> SHOULD KNOW why we need to do this to become more inclusive. > Which of these mails [2,3] called others fascist? Do feel free to > point out ones that don't appear in either query and quote them. You told me to educate myself in "far-right dog-whistles" implying another person was using them, and thus implying they were far-right extremists. Maybe I took it too seriously. (Also that person had called the proposal "woke" and I don't like that framing either) >> I think it is my right (as it is of others) as part of the community >> to demand some explanation for the change, and for ANY change, the >> same way I would demand explanations for commits I don't understand. >> Isn't that my job here? > That ought to be covered in the Motivation of a GCD, no? I personally > feel motivated by it. You're free to feel differently, I have no > control over you. But I don't think it's fair to say there's no > explanation. Well, the explanation is quite vague, and does not include possible drawbacks like the social price we are paying for it. Some may think that's because you were wiling to pay it. In the document I read "may be perceived as harmful" or "that spring to mind more easily" but both are vague suggestions of a possible harm. Nothing that actually exists. Every word may be perceived as harmful. People that supports your proposal do it for preference, but not because they are actually hurt by the word "master". It is fine, though. >> In the end, this has been put as those who reject the change are >> against social justice, and that's not an acceptable way to propose >> anything because it eliminates any possibility for a debate and >> erases the chance of anyone to be against the change. Reducing the >> issue to "If you confront -> you are against social justice". > So, assuming that you are for social justice, but against this change, > do you think this change constitutes a social injustice? > Or; assuming you are against social justice, would you rather not be > perceived as such? I think, this original let's rename the branches idea gained traction in the last years because it creates some social division where people could just check the default branch name of software projects to see if they were more left or right leaning and I don't like that. That's why I don't like it being applied here. Oftentimes this kind of proposals are made to stretch the project's social structure and try to find holes. We did have a similar episode with a patch being sent to the CoC for good initial reasons but what happened to be a person that claimed that trans women could not be considered women. I didn't read his intentions very well at the beginning, but if I'm not mistaken, you did. I think your proposal here is also a stretch in the social dynamics of a very diverse project. >> 6. I think the initial goal for the proposal was actually to look for >> confrontation. > Believe it or not, I actually was not prepared for the backlash I > received. I actually thought this would be a straight-forward change > to implement given the values that folks here share, and I'm not happy > to be proven wrong on that. Well, what happened here is what triggered my reserves since the very beginning, and I think I told you in the previous thread. You underestimated how diverse Guix is. Guix has people from all over the globe, and it shouldn't surprise you that many people here were not affected by the original push for the branch rename as much as you were. When I took part in the discussion it wasn't only in my name. Surely I could be more precise on it, but I tried to make you understand that those things that we consider superobvious (master might be offensive -> we change it) might not be so obvious to others, and we might pay a social price for discussing them in the terms you did. In a previous email I asked what would happen if we started a discussion about putting a "free palestine" label in the Guix website. Many software projects did that (also with Ukranian flags). The problem here is also related with what Ludovic mentioned: he changed the branch name in the shepherd without any hassle. He surely could put the "free palestine" label in the Shepherd website easily. But Guix is a global project, and thinking such a proposal would not have any backlash is very naive. That's why I think we should refrain from trying this kind of "very obvious" changes that are really rooted in our political views. We might be asking for too much for such a diverse group of people. Best, Ekaitz > Cheers > > [1] https://www.reddit.com/r/dotnet/comments/wrci66/is_the_name_master_branch_offensive/ > [2] https://yhetil.org/guix-devel/?q=fascist+s%3Amain+s%3Abranch > [3] https://yhetil.org/guix-patches/?q=fascist+s%3A76407 >
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Mar 2025 16:47:34 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 23 12:47:33 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52249 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1twOU1-0008DD-7A for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 12:47:33 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x344.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::344]:45550) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>) id 1twOTx-0008CO-Nv for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 12:47:31 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-x344.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4393dc02b78so24030135e9.3 for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 09:47:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1742748443; x=1743353243; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=i4+4pfK4i+dbvn2gyMgDt8NZ1uJkmXq2hFs3NQo2tfM=; b=k7AJ7LAykhi1mwtqCs8cEShslnEWo3sA0oe7N1YHoPG8ZgfylJEZakHs0l1Ug8tFzH hUzXuRJPyTkOlsW7E0C2YzCSZkJgLuS9k2IHfROpB4+VShmZvbO0S6nGcOgMOCP1rLvo mHcJDJRu4fke4IclRz6kn8EPP8NzB7DUX0jiJ3T0MfI1FimfGgCOIK0oRMexStmMBYr0 LeF8xZftKF6QhYfnno3R3vWhoBSjQYIEtUVSor2j9Kqtwwuvw1W23UxgAmsgFhHHGIke OgPjnwlAK5YHkA5IAzkkAi7RoZKHft6x1OXyhDRFTKBBssYYcgFUjCrgK1k8TlmGDFDb 1fgA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1742748443; x=1743353243; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=i4+4pfK4i+dbvn2gyMgDt8NZ1uJkmXq2hFs3NQo2tfM=; b=Ry3h5QBmmIkQoZjnZcvcVEWd2iETAr+/jDZ9VZhRyjKB2kJuUfHrYzPSm1kymcVbeJ JQuT/gsC9BYhJpUvIUSGTVxbmB2YfD8mPRJyh7r8GfjVtJUvP7vnmkDzi8o79rAdiVT4 U1NsjP6Wk2qon5SgjAM1tsIvPV3J0gN6SQM39gFadOESEyt/g15lNpy26UJocIZTACHU 1R5gWeCc/buPETtPK9RcSK6x1cf7ekawEIl+S5EoX5K9YnE/lILAsd0WQhRg7o3H6Eo4 4xSB/Kkljvg453/fIYtJG0e8LrtErLYfp3p8eIX255LbB6LJRAAYedeK11MZxq3mDxCr 1dDw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx12jS+qiEpwsN7dLUKWg9gjCQYO30bSjxF/dVR06dPFlhysmLN gklFwE42c1OiHPdICQgGWHCSBzXAnLiB0rQAxNP4auh4tjZCQZEu X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctNUndRzDSbmSFNEd7ggNdHS2xTEjojKcHAx6mHhztv47ptGh6CheK8zMKDLn/ 4AHzzh84KQ07Pn/+dM8CDtaoSklCway/zWGmDpwjvB6Cr0pjl8UTsbEB2wNgo4/YUowc94tlX1F 7Fyx52qtDo0O4ad/2GB0Ghfjm43zLtZmRv2h7udrXGaSdHlGDFmSiuF7brkKIuMGeuksz2YK/I+ 55K3QI9ymVFrqaMhvJBQ3yns478mTtwg4f7/6KyUcaqIkNHzy4bwpXXMZr4rwicOBoIS87D7DR6 ZPDwHh6bCduVaF23ddg6t71kI8PiuKPh/XAzRlRMqGAboVnO6T5Tqft8ZsFjgV5q9bHEpUF2nxP h+h3a5XP8d2FwzvHGbKorEF5nhNodzVw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGG/C1gPs7V8n5/MxEO7V4OlOXO7qerdK31IlgGYlgXFY8dZZD+NiGkYUMZa62VwIsEYQSB2Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1d15:b0:43c:fd1b:d6d6 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-43d50a5241cmr67846355e9.31.1742748443009; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 09:47:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lumine.fritz.box (85-127-114-32.dsl.dynamic.surfer.at. [85.127.114.32]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-43d4fceafacsm93051255e9.6.2025.03.23.09.47.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 23 Mar 2025 09:47:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2445d6dff0a8edb8c00b30111a967c02c4da0987.camel@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename the default branch From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> To: Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN>, Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 17:47:20 +0100 In-Reply-To: <738287cd-601e-482c-8af0-903381e38f3b@HIDDEN> References: <d835c85c709a393309e6cad4ab065d039f1e08af.camel@HIDDEN> <f072096c292546c760d1342aa7d4f6c950027da9.camel@HIDDEN> <87seocwh1p.fsf@HIDDEN> <87msej45ha.fsf@HIDDEN> <87wmdk8fpd.fsf@wireframe> <c2532d09-e54b-49fe-9ace-dca55239f394@HIDDEN> <d2db73de82bb7bb3a6589a4299287d02dc961c14.camel@HIDDEN> <547c549d-970e-4331-8944-dc7a79698426@HIDDEN> <87wmcm2sqc.fsf@HIDDEN> <49ba31a6-6f1d-4607-9169-95b7dc557cfb@HIDDEN> <871puq8hd8.fsf@HIDDEN> <738287cd-601e-482c-8af0-903381e38f3b@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.54.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Am Freitag, dem 21.03.2025 um 21:16 +0100 schrieb Ekaitz Zarraga: > Reasons behind it don't convince me, meaning that for me it's a > useless change that only wants to make some imaginary people more > comfortable making some real people uncomfortable. In my view, it's > stupid. What makes you uncomfortable about the proposed name? Is there any proposed alternative that you would like to see instead? If not, would you like to suggest an alternative? > The interesting way you are putting it is like you are trying to make > me think my opinion or feelings are not that important, which is > exactly my point against the change. I still didn't get any real > person telling me they are hurt by the word 'master'. What Simon is actually trying to achieve is to tell you that your opinion is not *the only one* that matters. It may well be, that everyone who thus far told you they are hurt by the word 'master' are actually bots (beep boop) and/or engaging in US imperialism. But there also exists a chance that you have thus far merely avoided =E2=80=93 deliberately or otherwise =E2=80=93 any real person who could convince you = that it's hurtful. Let's take a survey to get some actual numbers. According to [1], master appears inoffensive to about 80% of people and offensive to less than 10%, with the rest abstaining. Clearly, this must mean that branch naming is a non-issue, right? Right? Sadly, it's not that simple. For if you take a moment to consider that these people _are real_ and they feel offended by the word master, perhaps there is something offensive about it. Now, if you look into the comments, you will find some more arguments defending various people's choices of a default branch name that apply to their personal projects and what not. Some of those may be relevant to Guix, some of those may be not. As for arguments that are important to the Guix project, I think these would be or have been brought up in the discussion. > I'm "hurt" by this because this is the result of US American (moral)=20 > imperialism at work, and I reject it, as a citizen of the world. Changes happen. Even if this were the result of US imperialism =E2=80=93 w= hich for the record you keep postulating without evidence; at least as far as I can see =E2=80=93 you would have to find a way of dealing with it. No= w, you can choose to ignore that Git allows you to change the default branch name and reject any proposal to do so, but I think not everyone will do the same. > In summary, looks like we are more open to change things to please=20 > imaginary people than pleasing, lets say, just me, a real person, > that is actually part of the project. If our goal was pleasing those > that are uncomfortable, that would be a real debate to have. I am not convinced, that I should please you, particularly, rather than anyone else who participated in this process. If you have a reason as to why your opinion should be given special weight, I would like to hear it. As for only pleasing imaginary people, have you stopped to consider that those in favour of the change could be real people and not displeased by the change? Because it could just so happen to be that some folks would prefer another name over master. Personally, I'm one of them. I would feel quite happy with 'main' or 'trunk'; even 'stable' if we could make that guarantee. Now, I am aware, that this is all a preference and to an extent de gustibus, but I think we can come to a shared preference that maximizes happiness and minimizes harm for Guix contributors. > This discussion has been just some people agreeing and=20 > not explaining while they called others fascists or told them they=20 > SHOULD KNOW why we need to do this to become more inclusive. Which of these mails [2,3] called others fascist? Do feel free to point out ones that don't appear in either query and quote them. > I think it is my right (as it is of others) as part of the community > to demand some explanation for the change, and for ANY change, the > same way I would demand explanations for commits I don't understand. > Isn't that my job here? That ought to be covered in the Motivation of a GCD, no? I personally feel motivated by it. You're free to feel differently, I have no control over you. But I don't think it's fair to say there's no explanation. > In the end, this has been put as those who reject the change are > against social justice, and that's not an acceptable way to propose > anything because it eliminates any possibility for a debate and > erases the chance of anyone to be against the change. Reducing the > issue to "If you confront -> you are against social justice". So, assuming that you are for social justice, but against this change, do you think this change constitutes a social injustice? Or; assuming you are against social justice, would you rather not be perceived as such? > 6. I think the initial goal for the proposal was actually to look for > confrontation. Believe it or not, I actually was not prepared for the backlash I received. I actually thought this would be a straight-forward change to implement given the values that folks here share, and I'm not happy to be proven wrong on that. Cheers [1] https://www.reddit.com/r/dotnet/comments/wrci66/is_the_name_master_bran= ch_offensive/ [2] https://yhetil.org/guix-devel/?q=3Dfascist+s%3Amain+s%3Abranch [3] https://yhetil.org/guix-patches/?q=3Dfascist+s%3A76407
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Mar 2025 10:54:36 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 23 06:54:36 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47928 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1twIyR-0007bC-SI for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 06:54:36 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:55604) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1twIyP-0007a1-O7 for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 06:54:34 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEF1E82E; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 11:54:26 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: hera.aquilenet.fr; none X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavis at hera.aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id eagLWW6yqkYX; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 11:54:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from ribbon (91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net [91.160.117.201]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1B0166D1; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 11:54:25 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> To: Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#76407: [GCD] A better name for the default branch In-Reply-To: <49ba31a6-6f1d-4607-9169-95b7dc557cfb@HIDDEN> (Ekaitz Zarraga's message of "Tue, 18 Mar 2025 18:25:55 +0100") References: <d835c85c709a393309e6cad4ab065d039f1e08af.camel@HIDDEN> <f072096c292546c760d1342aa7d4f6c950027da9.camel@HIDDEN> <87seocwh1p.fsf@HIDDEN> <87msej45ha.fsf@HIDDEN> <87wmdk8fpd.fsf@wireframe> <c2532d09-e54b-49fe-9ace-dca55239f394@HIDDEN> <d2db73de82bb7bb3a6589a4299287d02dc961c14.camel@HIDDEN> <547c549d-970e-4331-8944-dc7a79698426@HIDDEN> <87wmcm2sqc.fsf@HIDDEN> <49ba31a6-6f1d-4607-9169-95b7dc557cfb@HIDDEN> Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 11:54:25 +0100 Message-ID: <8734f43tlq.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: EEF1E82E X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.10 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM(-3.00)[-1.000]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVRCPT(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[gmail.com,debbugs.gnu.org] X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Spamd-Bar: ------ X-Rspamd-Server: hera X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Egun on Ekaitz, Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN> skribis: > Also, what drains me from this is not only the fact that this is an > unreasonable change in many levels, but the fact that those who push > for it don't care about being reasonable but do care about winning and > labeling others as "far right". [=E2=80=A6] I haven=E2=80=99t read in detail the previous discussion on guix-devel that= you must be referring to, but derogatory comments like those you report could be a violation of the code of conduct. At any rate, that and the =E2=80=9Cus vs. them=E2=80=9D rhetoric (as in =E2= =80=9Cthose who push for it=E2=80=9D) is unhelpful and very different from how I think we like to work together here. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Mar 2025 10:24:48 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 23 06:24:48 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47781 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1twIVb-0005ds-Dr for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 06:24:48 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:56764) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1twIVY-0005cz-78 for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 06:24:45 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E24382E; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 11:24:37 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: hera.aquilenet.fr; none X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavis at hera.aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9AB_8rXhRZEr; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 11:24:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from ribbon (91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net [91.160.117.201]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 84B37221; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 11:24:36 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> To: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#76407: [GCD] A better name for the default branch In-Reply-To: <Z95BAoXPTySMg6lx@HIDDEN> (Leo Famulari's message of "Sat, 22 Mar 2025 00:48:02 -0400") References: <87seocwh1p.fsf@HIDDEN> <87msej45ha.fsf@HIDDEN> <87wmdk8fpd.fsf@wireframe> <c2532d09-e54b-49fe-9ace-dca55239f394@HIDDEN> <d2db73de82bb7bb3a6589a4299287d02dc961c14.camel@HIDDEN> <547c549d-970e-4331-8944-dc7a79698426@HIDDEN> <87wmcm2sqc.fsf@HIDDEN> <49ba31a6-6f1d-4607-9169-95b7dc557cfb@HIDDEN> <871puq8hd8.fsf@HIDDEN> <738287cd-601e-482c-8af0-903381e38f3b@HIDDEN> <Z95BAoXPTySMg6lx@HIDDEN> Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 11:24:35 +0100 Message-ID: <87iko03uzg.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8E24382E X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.89 / 15.00]; SPAM_FLAG(5.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_SPAM(2.99)[0.998]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-Spam-Level: **** X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ X-Rspamd-Server: hera X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Hello, Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> skribis: > I think I share Simon's point of view on this proposal. I'm basically > indifferent about the outcome of the proposal. I'd want to see a group > effort on enumerating, testing, and solving the technical challenges > before we make the change. There has been some discussion about that. I > think we should be careful about the technical stuff. I agree. It seems to me that the document proposes something doable and reasonable technically, but having more eyeballs would help find omissions or potential issues. FWIW I renamed the default branch of a few repositories over the past few years, notably Cuirass and Shepherd; it was rather friction-less but of course these are smaller repos with fewer contributors. > Guix team members are the constituents of the GCD process. If some of > them have objections to a proposal, that means there is work to do, from > all of us. Agreed. Ludo=E2=80=99.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Mar 2025 04:48:14 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat Mar 22 00:48:14 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40328 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tvqmM-00030h-1T for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2025 00:48:14 -0400 Received: from fhigh-a2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([103.168.172.153]:51653) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1tvqmI-00030S-JW for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2025 00:48:11 -0400 Received: from phl-compute-03.internal (phl-compute-03.phl.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B7991140161; Sat, 22 Mar 2025 00:48:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-02 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-03.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 22 Mar 2025 00:48:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=mesmtp; t=1742618885; x= 1742705285; bh=3ObsKODVGH4CUBrdQl0QHoVy07ngKkB2cfEho/WBfeE=; b=W OLG7FoE7GtrDwpcy/xPMipEzNQSYRRUqwOnl4ccFkwvchL6OkyBQpUTfPdGpNKha IyOggBkBb2OryYpoowQszL19DFewrM6uuMG7Kqab8tIJfBbAEhbjtFaOEehbIc3V n1OJAhC4W4zVPX2bAPyjv2smSQoszpfiUSTHCiKEuo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1742618885; x=1742705285; bh=3ObsKODVGH4CUBrdQl0QHoVy07ngKkB2cfE ho/WBfeE=; b=NSBYNWjHrpGjFgJV+mrUv+RlzdHiXz8iDYpvZgB7083gV+9NaFL 2ohvMwVLiybTUSYrFW3M59Xpl33gY59+jNEk8gikns1orp3W4DyxYZLkvshJ0PtD 7wJqreKK1IOOQnviHaLsGeV+D9qeGs6aB9jdapqF1Fvu5PWP7qfrcydWB8xXJDi4 oaV/d9nxuBuLKVjAkaBvJjjy3XU9knMphFt/f7qoPio29noWJDRWLY+45HqCkCQy AerwgvkwD7PzgL8uXceatCOQJAWjSeC9yT4ld3fY5kvG2/dx6qwpBzkNZsIhR0XB rFJEXZdirx3B5+53EbzHDny1Q6rdHf4g/Ww== X-ME-Sender: <xms:BEHeZ30TM-6xpa8n0sR6FusgLYoMAky6D4nQ0JBOIUg2IgK1QZgWVg> <xme:BEHeZ2G2c_R_ONgICrp3K4oqnlxEAJXZIELeiZr2HBMjhskDSgijPSsLktcIFPWEC KB6LGvkt-CIX0p3jA> X-ME-Received: <xmr:BEHeZ34l7EHzx0gR71qJ5I4lan4BR6_7WhC933PQpOtu-qNqAiU15jif4T5GB-yOtegbTULTGiC8svmqUUJkD-9i> X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefvddrtddtgdduheeftdehucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggv pdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpih gvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepfffhvfevuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddt vdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcuhfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhird hnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhephfetgffgueeufeelhfevleetteejudfgtdef hfduuefhledvgeevhfetgffhkeeunecuffhomhgrihhnpehsvggvughsfhhorhgthhgrnh hgvgdrohhrghdruhhknecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghi lhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepvd dpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtohepvghkrghithiisegvlhgvnhhqrdht vggthhdprhgtphhtthhopeejieegtdejseguvggssghughhsrdhgnhhurdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:BEHeZ82WRlTMh2gQogh2gf19b8llsCwVkLeKx9nshJ12OO5xv4sVfw> <xmx:BEHeZ6EnylQCpIGz_vDoPvu_OFbkvgHOv5aDFppOPajfzWLQKRKIHg> <xmx:BEHeZ98hAGH2RQE3sHjhAFlGi_eLd0WaiBveenFzlJQYoLO2tHmnyA> <xmx:BEHeZ3lXrnnJPvLAYG-Jf4GFlGyzh_QmyJivkm9FxaKIQtPWVMJPag> <xmx:BUHeZ_QnvPJmpWCnkd6eiJWfpa0X6CMJ7yOfmtoiocmDNl09Lz-AKq8Y> Feedback-ID: i819c4023:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sat, 22 Mar 2025 00:48:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 00:48:02 -0400 From: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> To: Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename the default branch Message-ID: <Z95BAoXPTySMg6lx@HIDDEN> References: <87seocwh1p.fsf@HIDDEN> <87msej45ha.fsf@HIDDEN> <87wmdk8fpd.fsf@wireframe> <c2532d09-e54b-49fe-9ace-dca55239f394@HIDDEN> <d2db73de82bb7bb3a6589a4299287d02dc961c14.camel@HIDDEN> <547c549d-970e-4331-8944-dc7a79698426@HIDDEN> <87wmcm2sqc.fsf@HIDDEN> <49ba31a6-6f1d-4607-9169-95b7dc557cfb@HIDDEN> <871puq8hd8.fsf@HIDDEN> <738287cd-601e-482c-8af0-903381e38f3b@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <738287cd-601e-482c-8af0-903381e38f3b@HIDDEN> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) I think I share Simon's point of view on this proposal. I'm basically indifferent about the outcome of the proposal. I'd want to see a group effort on enumerating, testing, and solving the technical challenges before we make the change. There has been some discussion about that. I think we should be careful about the technical stuff. On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 09:16:35PM +0100, Ekaitz Zarraga wrote: > In summary, looks like we are more open to change things to please imaginary > people than pleasing, lets say, just me, a real person, that is actually > part of the project. After I read Ekaitz's message here, I went back and read the thread. As I read it, Ekaitz's message highlights that there has not been much consensus-building. I think that when there is disagreement about a GCD, there needs to be be active work to build a consensus that is enthusiastic --- not indifferent. I've been intimately involved in organizations that govern themselves with a structured consensus system like the GCD process, and it's work that requires a lot of energy and strong social skills. My experience made me think that the range of topics that can be successfully handled with consensus may be limited to that which pertains to the shared experience of the members. Else, the group may not be able to actually reach a consensus, and maybe it comes to a vote, or some people just accept a change indifferently or with calculated resignation. (Those can be okay outcomes too, IMO, even the last one. You can't always get what you want.) My point is that we all share an experience with Guix, computing, Git, etc, but not with English language or the English and American societies. Guix team members are the constituents of the GCD process. If some of them have objections to a proposal, that means there is work to do, from all of us. To quote the Decision Making section of the GCD text itself (GCD 001): ------ Contributors and even more so team members are expected to help build consensus. By using consensus, we are committed to finding solutions that everyone can live with. Thus, no decision is made against significant concerns; these concerns are actively resolved through counter proposals. A deliberating member disapproving a proposal bears a responsibility for finding alternatives, proposing ideas or code, or explaining the rationale for the status quo. To learn what consensus decision making means and understand its finer details, you are encouraged to read <https://www.seedsforchange.org.uk/consensus>. ------
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Mar 2025 20:16:50 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Mar 21 16:16:49 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39685 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tvinR-0001Wn-Bt for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Mar 2025 16:16:49 -0400 Received: from dane.soverin.net ([2a10:de80:1:4092:b9e9:2295:0:1]:52099) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ekaitz@HIDDEN>) id 1tvinN-0001WS-FW for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Mar 2025 16:16:47 -0400 Received: from smtp.soverin.net (c04smtp-lb01.int.sover.in [10.10.4.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dane.soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ZKDHS357rzyTd; Fri, 21 Mar 2025 20:16:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.soverin.net (smtp.soverin.net [10.10.4.100]) by soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4ZKDHS0HDfzFH; Fri, 21 Mar 2025 20:16:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.soverin.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=elenq.tech header.i=@elenq.tech header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=soverin1 header.b=yBmQNIFc; dkim-atps=neutral DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=elenq.tech; s=soverin1; t=1742588196; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=7LDlPYpqFDXkP+Cv2YMJE9mu0pbnjXr3FsVrIrap8uc=; b=yBmQNIFc/Uv2wFeCIsqc+3lQO06AMeFWgj6gS/yYAIe/kzDVkugTwpj1h0C3dtagNES/67 CYSadZvKbTtGnUe2cjBdPXfz+FGrHYvhfSCDR1CQZlwBAVM8YOBNJcsZzEyM8/d9vehCOC E1BHVBJt897mM0c1ww/B6SIWS65EWmlzl/o0yPgoELnNLjb2Ugy8GR8MiWRaTorPJjuPm1 qriuayXRM3KYCAV5winGuwGgyxY93+dV95UNE+U/y/F9L2VOhDGytsvfSLejX8sqz2agh1 io2foWlQiLvRECbNn2GemxpCFUJGXrm4vRf4RVRUFASHjToUMAL3GVB4UdK84w== X-CM-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=d/oPyQjE c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=67ddc924 a=GfXQuWAYjYMZp4ahSyumlQ==:117 a=GfXQuWAYjYMZp4ahSyumlQ==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=MKtGQD3n3ToA:10 a=1oJP67jkp3AA:10 a=rOA8YBIX8kW-EediuYoA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=yPy0HX4kI4LsAlP3oO-2:22 X-CM-Envelope: MS4xfPzNpZHZxrptieaO4Zd5lznbbQDkRRw/kxWmoFwie4cK9ZxDj6d0B7PL4c6HwrW04jAMhvodWXaO8vTY+OlGBe/YhDEga4e74SuWrjmZRv7NCnc/Kqoa 95L3uiaOMQyP5pBGzoyMEX/mFsshW6fzmVznqzkz6sw9T0r6o7uumARFVu8WBvwm+Pzbik22eLwSOMcFkYleymWiu10TOOrUyl3jgqQCNAe1EtHQUtDsLxEy Message-ID: <738287cd-601e-482c-8af0-903381e38f3b@HIDDEN> Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 21:16:35 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename the default branch To: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> References: <d835c85c709a393309e6cad4ab065d039f1e08af.camel@HIDDEN> <f072096c292546c760d1342aa7d4f6c950027da9.camel@HIDDEN> <87seocwh1p.fsf@HIDDEN> <87msej45ha.fsf@HIDDEN> <87wmdk8fpd.fsf@wireframe> <c2532d09-e54b-49fe-9ace-dca55239f394@HIDDEN> <d2db73de82bb7bb3a6589a4299287d02dc961c14.camel@HIDDEN> <547c549d-970e-4331-8944-dc7a79698426@HIDDEN> <87wmcm2sqc.fsf@HIDDEN> <49ba31a6-6f1d-4607-9169-95b7dc557cfb@HIDDEN> <871puq8hd8.fsf@HIDDEN> Content-Language: en-US From: Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN> Autocrypt: addr=ekaitz@HIDDEN; keydata= xsFNBGcvh/QBEACePF16wEeQaqfJNgeaSQB6ty6PzLaYtl8UVApPSCF1PYNEhDtxQOOpBXeu k6h68cjhRX7hmug8mAraXotw4aG4Z3kbUro4fzXOYW3rCi/mAm5NFXLUmBX3E1AV1pcD8hDA 5s3LeGzfTo4xRGTW4zTzxGEyrvbChkVib7wTSk52a/WkFas6l3sXnepF8HmIEOWkwQcYdcuo gaNDFP1kjZYvqfKJXmCZnY+lC8Zfe/vlD/x8FZQYBQ5xgXIfbSR0xlRz/XIHfJv6j+3myUUr 2UKMku1dkjlkhNkyfw+RypQzmbJ0oJ4bk76/ju0nnlN65/LvyeTVUh/2O2VnPnZ49keL8sqr APXF4di4pWT+/mPxfoEtiSDtjyzbr8+ajcwLa4SSKLlexqjZj8X6R4tt31Rf/Pliwe4TdPmd 2leE3BIJl9bAuslEvd5tqZ1oa3Zfb62tvpaJCRYMtOEWuGkYdyrwTW7UXJPQpam4X7WoW2jW c5aTpAnpnqIPzaWJmua1lGQjEXgt4xvVdhVmZq32fkTy/rXw9l5a+XU7N4/Zz8AR/0xO+UBc Q1J+wHADjL8Q0v0tZLEaiWL72AsxN3GMWNPXWAplaTPUNPUlNK0JPHwhTX/cQVkIc9avSKc3 BeUofC96d13I7QmRjQ0gcBaLtV9lMOuYwbC+6tb70x2fQsI3bwARAQABzSJFa2FpdHogWmFy cmFnYSA8ZWthaXR6QGVsZW5xLnRlY2g+wsGUBBMBCAA+FiEEXb4j05BTZSZ/jMdq/blSvT9z VtYFAmcvh/QCGwMFCQPCZwAFCwkIBwIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQ/blSvT9zVtbW CRAAkbla35s8RKhQBweqwEcdYDV2Zpt16OgENymjLs/qhh7Y9WgWZ0YraSNYDGCt6lemhior vrXX48+yZC98c8ZgCrr4Hmt8i/6TvJqVhwlZ9//3W/z/YuYDtUPBzRHgwM8tejiXmNqYM8lF Jg64pQaczmGAR29Xf0WTQegSociBSUg9eC7BS74Uh7UbHCgytyretoKmqJAp8SKE/Czt5x4R lXKVgGawzg1GerriwnNbudy0eyl1q0Pn7Q+K+tQ14EPDAM+QsGR/fBV4a3uYP6sBF+SdM+DO LX5MRVbWJ8O3kLmbAKQeLgSLlnYydMY/mTvjgxMAakfGCA4q69gmyDSB0fzAUm3c1JV5VwIo 63rykiOEB/k2m4aiiujH5kOC86sjb273+XXWlOhOEO/vKHHdAh+B7dnEEYUPXnUEMQ23PaF4 22u7C62kw3yH/krKr60t5FxcqNWtCOxEWc0WMZw12Q3Gw8+9oA5DI/f4gjlGvQiQWqj6dvoX vIDmifr0R3sTi6xh+udu2Rp8PsKOW8ZRyQ0/VOiwzBfQkf4PFowaiRp8LnkjLEVft6ruuA1h awO2SKKJ8WpgZPw5oMigZR5DgbunxMD4BcqmD7bSoTRV/ljx1I8UgAaQLPqVVnLt31iENtLv 43kPHl56AbYpAzcvf8nGU3KPhGOoByyuyph4RYDOwU0EZy+H9AEQANc9vw7DnBeNGKhq1Bg5 oiGII7npGXCChe7PB6CJjkvN6n1kXrvBYsaORXvZJPNgmBTKu/ETGYS0t0YeGlI4WTOK9dgB /7T8dngRmrGjPmZjryzfk18tXnJq0zoLixLizDT3FqV4jOG5KjPTxQvpdBMiX9oX4Je2OMqF d14fopLGav0rW7Fh5p83OSREpXbJUJJiUaH3p9U9Ss8IBHzr669PViAqe09EfxL/L0l1JIFj HQjJcg01PUXZAW6aPtd7q6eNCSLTXYPiDRQe2GdRUcB7WfqCogR/LEpzLLcd0NkxCnc0T6da rq2Dupt8rvQ95L4/cOGVcDUDOGE6U92XCkaCvUQkypxQCGKSEjbTFoLRG/4JQj0pAWSaqxPS 7hkTFql4qUAdRwzHN1ib6XedcFfqHSy2Mk5ttW8DaBGKhCm7Mn6+4smXENHSuQxCqHlCQ2m+ 9ogpbxavNVfAblE/ucxyfyo6FlDbGHEG3Yu5296kUPT7PqZLiR3KetMPJfCLY2jVPio3t4tD s7Sj41sG5aIwEApb0Zoz3bPBt5O5GUoPFnXyjO306WLxXrM2tjY38jwHxF1Qvs3HQTJgRei2 g3D3KiiR27cXXs/8lrr8tblr5J1tE4TaQCea5lDuEgTCDLnlcopoYcKpFAUBGQtzcNkudT9w sM2nf9y6INcUE3FlABEBAAHCwXwEGAEIACYWIQRdviPTkFNlJn+Mx2r9uVK9P3NW1gUCZy+H 9AIbDAUJA8JnAAAKCRD9uVK9P3NW1td1D/4xx8AbDKAKx9ezT6GdTZbK6FS66qRQCEzTa5MX ZCEogASOla71CB10l5fFtsRWCtNQLzmgwkFwhdxyjqendDgacc5v/71NBb5KpKni6wDJMeiG s3Lq3ZgWfHte3NZ99iSH+La3aBSFbCloJ/Yf/MJBkzrm1sTTKcgF9/i0pzkume5vtpKRDjjS z4abHu7qk4Sgi5gwWpoKFTT38q6nLP+9SUla3JJjNqU3gvn8kwv6KDMKc4marnSp/c+5O6E+ lNrxMdD0n8+io/Bf/UEI6BU8F7JshPq732bHN1NzUXvgMd4cNsAlvsWM8UCKZ4/usFl1euMM FOvnadZinsTHpXhahJzkYWA7nAKbCoNNq9LPtWxfjHsIfhs+QQafF31Pw+jqHqruB4tH0eiL abrz7kejaZvJdVipNIzRUWYnpP+18khep2UtT1n9VNs6QNb4cHPsoe+s4ga4ZK/klCdEhLya XtbcaNEHb7NZUOBj3HhKFgIY8PD1AptAObHjsUNF5+jfEnl+5WjwyTZTIgDRiOrwn8LWOANQ 0JpR69t06uJwmiogQgnlYe36YFaauHGQZFa+L+R2zgnGn8TnR4C3tH7gNAef9+PKqgmJT5pN IkFzlDmZi05E9xzhj4WQ/OOsqU64eHL2PaDk+2TdfrzNwNFbkABJ+C7BHNAytQ6h9cpUbg== In-Reply-To: <871puq8hd8.fsf@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spampanel-Class: ham X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Simon, I know this change is going to happen regardless of what those who oppose it think. That's why I just say I'm not convinced. Reasons behind it don't convince me, meaning that for me it's a useless change that only wants to make some imaginary people more comfortable making some real people uncomfortable. In my view, it's stupid. The interesting way you are putting it is like you are trying to make me think my opinion or feelings are not that important, which is exactly my point against the change. I still didn't get any real person telling me they are hurt by the word 'master'. I'm "hurt" by this because this is the result of US American (moral) imperialism at work, and I reject it, as a citizen of the world. And following your points, my opinion does NOT have a value, but ARGUMENTS do (or should have). That's how I wish projects were handled. We cannot please everybody, what I argue here is we are selecting who we please, using poor arguments, and talking about imaginary people. In summary, looks like we are more open to change things to please imaginary people than pleasing, lets say, just me, a real person, that is actually part of the project. If our goal was pleasing those that are uncomfortable, that would be a real debate to have. That's never been the goal of any of this, and that also I reject. This conversation has been confrontational, specially by who opened it in the name of inclusion and "making people comfortable". If that was the real concern, this was a pretty poor way to do it. So, I also reject the way this has been conducted. I've also been pretty critical about moving to a forge, and I shared my concerns about it in the past. But the way the proposal has been conducted is not confrontational, and its arguments are solid. I can't do anything else than support that change. That's how things should be done. About cider and pintxos, I have some homemade cider I'd love to share with you anytime, if you come for a visit. About meaningless things, it's not that this "appears" to be meaningless, it's that nobody even bothered to make it even reasonable. If we are really proposing a change, let me do my part and demand proper justifications. This discussion has been just some people agreeing and not explaining while they called others fascists or told them they SHOULD KNOW why we need to do this to become more inclusive. I think it is my right (as it is of others) as part of the community to demand some explanation for the change, and for ANY change, the same way I would demand explanations for commits I don't understand. Isn't that my job here? In the end, this has been put as those who reject the change are against social justice, and that's not an acceptable way to propose anything because it eliminates any possibility for a debate and erases the chance of anyone to be against the change. Reducing the issue to "If you confront -> you are against social justice". This (by itself, regardless if the change is stupid or not) only fosters division in our community, and I have to reject that too. So, if you prefer: I'm AGAINST the change because: 1. I don't think the proposal allowed honest discussion, so it's biased. 2. I don't think the proposal has any base. 3. I don't think the change will make the project more inclusive, but may be counterproductive. 4. The change does minimal harm, but more than an absolute zero. 5. I think this change opens the door to similar proposals, which I don't think are positive for the community, specially if they are conducted like this one. 6. I think the initial goal for the proposal was actually to look for confrontation. Tl;dr: I do NOT consent. Maybe if this whole thing was done differently I would, and I'm still open to ARGUMENTS that change my mind. In any case, I believe it's going to be done, regardless of what I share here, and some people will start to look at me with different eyes because of this. Thanks, I suppose. Best, Ekaitz
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Mar 2025 19:13:13 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Mar 21 15:13:13 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39551 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1tvhns-0006rc-NQ
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Mar 2025 15:13:13 -0400
Received: from mail-wm1-x32c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::32c]:54767)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>)
id 1tvhnp-0006rI-Ee
for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Mar 2025 15:13:10 -0400
Received: by mail-wm1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id
5b1f17b1804b1-43d07ca6a80so11513535e9.1
for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 21 Mar 2025 12:13:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1742584383; x=1743189183; darn=debbugs.gnu.org;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references
:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
:reply-to; bh=xk3u/oV7UwvEtbieWenKxhV/j195WIqH8zyzG+834pE=;
b=QD7dqduDrxdRgYC8e/aUEDSmsKD1MLcL9l0l8nFaON06xOH+wB6ThxxusEeI1d5c0m
ICDn0CE5lNaEAVN6zMm4G3hPU7oSr/NuIOaD5uUnEN2w9kR8NYcGMvOz/bMXo50HaA75
4N/zDYOe+OBbMQPHBNovzRc9YPLf85XCJwQOX67Ftc8rY/FZHjYLD/6alhrAp51QE0KM
jm3Q34k9lWpA+rj9Mm2Slqiaoh+afBltYf6OMldjC1Mc1EqoXQHL1auEuAkhsWfgkb7X
5AG9NF9GNdP8aB+HVql3c6GikXEXvVwAg1zlB+OMw202dKu1jjfnPvjwAGV0J4AcxcqD
9Zpw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1742584383; x=1743189183;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references
:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=xk3u/oV7UwvEtbieWenKxhV/j195WIqH8zyzG+834pE=;
b=CfanER+D5GsPY/pKF4BmqBt3w9ZXeFJpi5eu5TL5rV8R6d1ItvIgLkN3i9TALcgRa6
r7/ZdhlW3DJxrtB6pDdBgefCLwHhCEcwIe3tsh7KgmiPDk05s9KxUZizBOLmbnZE3wmx
QlnY0u4FF7U+lc2HH37uw7Sz5mBBBeSbW6/G2CGOPaN7A4Bi/6ezruuc7EFpIeYEDPXm
EH1WSLTB4sJ2V+NtutWw5VPFbzajFKAwZr1r4L6jp9PMPlxZmHocs4ivXuDy7EE97zI2
YAy3cqWhYAfP1wqCdd6OLhFIBog9K5i/KHgu7VOTr+Bzf7gk59CDedyKc1kKdaLtC6Ps
8sJg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwzRobi0QM+CJS/m5cPuy/PWwHtkV5zPxa6geNROVd7IEedpclB
7k9W2Or0Qbvht8u0IyVUXjjje3x1zfSabHr66N3CbTTDa2Zc157M+S8+UA==
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncv7VBOCWJl8XUEBcmpa9L3r7dAwl7vza0cGr8urarwmKNuKAKIdoeHNOgES3V4
4h8tY7LYIHnDfF6vECxiroxiQpHMYIAlWMtE7KiWVZaie8ZY0AK4VxAOsSdaJDzXdwI8tGI4swL
gVsUu/YuAxSJk8WCiVZlCLNVRC9+nYteBrxcas5uhOW3edMvBLjnDJ17j9isO306H2boeMWCDv2
TeIDvwGPnbLEwIdQzx8jdyMKFTTZ/CN97any/O++cVKrxeuvFyxRoPJC6nSB+RkiP0Eovi/YPUw
Keb9iZl+1uPHViaghyj+pwdKXpH4xIy27u3t+t+1dlJqpdHMQUuOGOwzsJnNds1dh39SxCM+6pQ
a2UN2N5xdsS+bV7vQVfP66aBLqJOevFqJkS57mjhQ
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGtJws0762BvVNuJNXP+hDdHHwG/dYVJbo3WqXfUADFmWsvnGGlODnPut49Ll83ZCW6UAkxkQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4ed3:b0:43c:f85d:1245 with SMTP id
5b1f17b1804b1-43d509f8503mr49345875e9.17.1742584382911;
Fri, 21 Mar 2025 12:13:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lili (roam-nat-fw-prg-194-254-61-40.net.univ-paris-diderot.fr.
[194.254.61.40]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
ffacd0b85a97d-3997f9e64casm3114977f8f.73.2025.03.21.12.13.02
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
Fri, 21 Mar 2025 12:13:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
To: Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename the default branch
In-Reply-To: <49ba31a6-6f1d-4607-9169-95b7dc557cfb@HIDDEN>
References: <d835c85c709a393309e6cad4ab065d039f1e08af.camel@HIDDEN>
<f072096c292546c760d1342aa7d4f6c950027da9.camel@HIDDEN>
<87seocwh1p.fsf@HIDDEN> <87msej45ha.fsf@HIDDEN>
<87wmdk8fpd.fsf@wireframe>
<c2532d09-e54b-49fe-9ace-dca55239f394@HIDDEN>
<d2db73de82bb7bb3a6589a4299287d02dc961c14.camel@HIDDEN>
<547c549d-970e-4331-8944-dc7a79698426@HIDDEN>
<87wmcm2sqc.fsf@HIDDEN>
<49ba31a6-6f1d-4607-9169-95b7dc557cfb@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 17:42:59 +0100
Message-ID: <871puq8hd8.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407
Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
Hi Ekaitz,
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 at 18:25, Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN> wrote:
> I can live with it, but I'm not convinced.
On my side, I do not think in term of =E2=80=9Cbeing convinced=E2=80=9C. I=
nstead, I do
my best to think in term of =E2=80=9Cdo I consent?=E2=80=9D
We do not need to be convinced by something to consent about it, IMHO,
Here, I refrain to ask myself if the current proposal is a good strategy
for tackling what it attempts to fix =E2=80=93 obviously, I have a (strong)
opinion too! Yes, as a geek I have opinions on many topics. :-)
However, here I hide behind this position:
1. What does my own opinion value?
And
2. Does the change hurt my principles?
For instance, assume I would not be convinced by <proposal>, i.e., I
would consider some proposed strategy would change absolutely nothing
about whatever <issue>; assume my conviction of this proposed strategy
would appear to me as the null strategy of the void. And instead, my
conviction would be about doing X and Y and maybe <issue> would be
deeper than human scale. The question still reads:
a)=C2=A0Does the <proposal> hurt my principles? If no,
=20=20
b)=C2=A0does the <proposal> block my conviction about what we should do
instead?
Cheers,
simon
PS: On many other points, I partially agree and I refrain to engage a
discussion=E2=80=A6 because such discussion deserves pintxo and some ci=
der
your country have the secret. :-)
> I understand, but this way of thinking only encourages more
> decisions that many "can live with", but they are not meaningful.
Yes, being social implies we consent to decision that appears to us
meaningless. When playing =E2=80=9Cwhich superpower would you like to
have?=E2=80=9C, my answer is always: being able to see the world as oth=
er
see it, because I would help me to deal with all these decisions
that appear to me meaningless.
=20=20=20=20
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Mar 2025 17:26:10 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Mar 18 13:26:10 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42976 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tuahe-00040o-1J for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 13:26:10 -0400 Received: from dane.soverin.net ([2a10:de80:1:4092:b9e9:229e:0:1]:57857) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ekaitz@HIDDEN>) id 1tuahZ-0003zH-1h for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 13:26:07 -0400 Received: from smtp.soverin.net (c04smtp-lb01.int.sover.in [10.10.4.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dane.soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ZHJdw4Wv6z103V; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 17:25:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.soverin.net (smtp.soverin.net [10.10.4.99]) by soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4ZHJdw226gz5C; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 17:25:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.soverin.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=elenq.tech header.i=@elenq.tech header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=soverin1 header.b=XjF/cTNG; dkim-atps=neutral DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=elenq.tech; s=soverin1; t=1742318756; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=6nZvWROca+WWIp4oOCWCwBiGngxi1uf/bc9vmlpLjrY=; b=XjF/cTNGj58eDvB+43Mp+gQLh/eIG/FOwO4iv34HilpCX0o1wRRNsHqPnHgb5QtIOBbLXO MRnqRT1Qh+5sT4IhGYhyDgnY+3CWeEa8SMwfss836CXZk/c6R0WWAyRnqKMC05PZhLqnif T3Ip6fKtn2eWGVPQZsTKLgbl1F1KbxV3zMxt+eUwedWl9d7LIPn5AmBgHXZGxrSd9KPPvC fWuzNtzdvupoF01yx0XS2lavhrfKSCpP83c4hsGqE+/0FIipNEBeTz3RBKntgEYz4S/vSj 77osURzM4EnS675wNj/SYUiJCthmaeTd8k7ClKAXnVQewpDFocmsNbMDHWn/hA== X-CM-Envelope: MS4xfGXqqg+vul2ZZK90dW5C0Zr6cyoXmqGrH6euA6z3ZDgWJUu4UWIfXCtqPXdk5IbKk0VipW9+WlQtiHG8Sabcdw+nLIIhWzJr/f27XME2wIGWvYmTdMq4 yMyoaE6iIFzqyjXDxMJWXMbOlFXJ8uxb0AvvnILYP1ozLjfd8gMTp4F8EUL+Ta6c9d+j7s8ikmJ7lrkCm3ziGV4FXfb81uuMrFv9INNI03Sz9Dw/TBJTFrZE X-CM-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=UsCZN/wB c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=67d9aca4 a=GfXQuWAYjYMZp4ahSyumlQ==:117 a=GfXQuWAYjYMZp4ahSyumlQ==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=MKtGQD3n3ToA:10 a=1oJP67jkp3AA:10 a=owB4t5Ae9MUhKxgGOTAA:9 a=3ZKOabzyN94A:10 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=yPy0HX4kI4LsAlP3oO-2:22 Message-ID: <49ba31a6-6f1d-4607-9169-95b7dc557cfb@HIDDEN> Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 18:25:55 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename the default branch To: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> References: <d835c85c709a393309e6cad4ab065d039f1e08af.camel@HIDDEN> <f072096c292546c760d1342aa7d4f6c950027da9.camel@HIDDEN> <87seocwh1p.fsf@HIDDEN> <87msej45ha.fsf@HIDDEN> <87wmdk8fpd.fsf@wireframe> <c2532d09-e54b-49fe-9ace-dca55239f394@HIDDEN> <d2db73de82bb7bb3a6589a4299287d02dc961c14.camel@HIDDEN> <547c549d-970e-4331-8944-dc7a79698426@HIDDEN> <87wmcm2sqc.fsf@HIDDEN> Content-Language: en-US, es-ES, eu From: Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN> Autocrypt: addr=ekaitz@HIDDEN; keydata= xsFNBGcvh/QBEACePF16wEeQaqfJNgeaSQB6ty6PzLaYtl8UVApPSCF1PYNEhDtxQOOpBXeu k6h68cjhRX7hmug8mAraXotw4aG4Z3kbUro4fzXOYW3rCi/mAm5NFXLUmBX3E1AV1pcD8hDA 5s3LeGzfTo4xRGTW4zTzxGEyrvbChkVib7wTSk52a/WkFas6l3sXnepF8HmIEOWkwQcYdcuo gaNDFP1kjZYvqfKJXmCZnY+lC8Zfe/vlD/x8FZQYBQ5xgXIfbSR0xlRz/XIHfJv6j+3myUUr 2UKMku1dkjlkhNkyfw+RypQzmbJ0oJ4bk76/ju0nnlN65/LvyeTVUh/2O2VnPnZ49keL8sqr APXF4di4pWT+/mPxfoEtiSDtjyzbr8+ajcwLa4SSKLlexqjZj8X6R4tt31Rf/Pliwe4TdPmd 2leE3BIJl9bAuslEvd5tqZ1oa3Zfb62tvpaJCRYMtOEWuGkYdyrwTW7UXJPQpam4X7WoW2jW c5aTpAnpnqIPzaWJmua1lGQjEXgt4xvVdhVmZq32fkTy/rXw9l5a+XU7N4/Zz8AR/0xO+UBc Q1J+wHADjL8Q0v0tZLEaiWL72AsxN3GMWNPXWAplaTPUNPUlNK0JPHwhTX/cQVkIc9avSKc3 BeUofC96d13I7QmRjQ0gcBaLtV9lMOuYwbC+6tb70x2fQsI3bwARAQABzSJFa2FpdHogWmFy cmFnYSA8ZWthaXR6QGVsZW5xLnRlY2g+wsGUBBMBCAA+FiEEXb4j05BTZSZ/jMdq/blSvT9z VtYFAmcvh/QCGwMFCQPCZwAFCwkIBwIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQ/blSvT9zVtbW CRAAkbla35s8RKhQBweqwEcdYDV2Zpt16OgENymjLs/qhh7Y9WgWZ0YraSNYDGCt6lemhior vrXX48+yZC98c8ZgCrr4Hmt8i/6TvJqVhwlZ9//3W/z/YuYDtUPBzRHgwM8tejiXmNqYM8lF Jg64pQaczmGAR29Xf0WTQegSociBSUg9eC7BS74Uh7UbHCgytyretoKmqJAp8SKE/Czt5x4R lXKVgGawzg1GerriwnNbudy0eyl1q0Pn7Q+K+tQ14EPDAM+QsGR/fBV4a3uYP6sBF+SdM+DO LX5MRVbWJ8O3kLmbAKQeLgSLlnYydMY/mTvjgxMAakfGCA4q69gmyDSB0fzAUm3c1JV5VwIo 63rykiOEB/k2m4aiiujH5kOC86sjb273+XXWlOhOEO/vKHHdAh+B7dnEEYUPXnUEMQ23PaF4 22u7C62kw3yH/krKr60t5FxcqNWtCOxEWc0WMZw12Q3Gw8+9oA5DI/f4gjlGvQiQWqj6dvoX vIDmifr0R3sTi6xh+udu2Rp8PsKOW8ZRyQ0/VOiwzBfQkf4PFowaiRp8LnkjLEVft6ruuA1h awO2SKKJ8WpgZPw5oMigZR5DgbunxMD4BcqmD7bSoTRV/ljx1I8UgAaQLPqVVnLt31iENtLv 43kPHl56AbYpAzcvf8nGU3KPhGOoByyuyph4RYDOwU0EZy+H9AEQANc9vw7DnBeNGKhq1Bg5 oiGII7npGXCChe7PB6CJjkvN6n1kXrvBYsaORXvZJPNgmBTKu/ETGYS0t0YeGlI4WTOK9dgB /7T8dngRmrGjPmZjryzfk18tXnJq0zoLixLizDT3FqV4jOG5KjPTxQvpdBMiX9oX4Je2OMqF d14fopLGav0rW7Fh5p83OSREpXbJUJJiUaH3p9U9Ss8IBHzr669PViAqe09EfxL/L0l1JIFj HQjJcg01PUXZAW6aPtd7q6eNCSLTXYPiDRQe2GdRUcB7WfqCogR/LEpzLLcd0NkxCnc0T6da rq2Dupt8rvQ95L4/cOGVcDUDOGE6U92XCkaCvUQkypxQCGKSEjbTFoLRG/4JQj0pAWSaqxPS 7hkTFql4qUAdRwzHN1ib6XedcFfqHSy2Mk5ttW8DaBGKhCm7Mn6+4smXENHSuQxCqHlCQ2m+ 9ogpbxavNVfAblE/ucxyfyo6FlDbGHEG3Yu5296kUPT7PqZLiR3KetMPJfCLY2jVPio3t4tD s7Sj41sG5aIwEApb0Zoz3bPBt5O5GUoPFnXyjO306WLxXrM2tjY38jwHxF1Qvs3HQTJgRei2 g3D3KiiR27cXXs/8lrr8tblr5J1tE4TaQCea5lDuEgTCDLnlcopoYcKpFAUBGQtzcNkudT9w sM2nf9y6INcUE3FlABEBAAHCwXwEGAEIACYWIQRdviPTkFNlJn+Mx2r9uVK9P3NW1gUCZy+H 9AIbDAUJA8JnAAAKCRD9uVK9P3NW1td1D/4xx8AbDKAKx9ezT6GdTZbK6FS66qRQCEzTa5MX ZCEogASOla71CB10l5fFtsRWCtNQLzmgwkFwhdxyjqendDgacc5v/71NBb5KpKni6wDJMeiG s3Lq3ZgWfHte3NZ99iSH+La3aBSFbCloJ/Yf/MJBkzrm1sTTKcgF9/i0pzkume5vtpKRDjjS z4abHu7qk4Sgi5gwWpoKFTT38q6nLP+9SUla3JJjNqU3gvn8kwv6KDMKc4marnSp/c+5O6E+ lNrxMdD0n8+io/Bf/UEI6BU8F7JshPq732bHN1NzUXvgMd4cNsAlvsWM8UCKZ4/usFl1euMM FOvnadZinsTHpXhahJzkYWA7nAKbCoNNq9LPtWxfjHsIfhs+QQafF31Pw+jqHqruB4tH0eiL abrz7kejaZvJdVipNIzRUWYnpP+18khep2UtT1n9VNs6QNb4cHPsoe+s4ga4ZK/klCdEhLya XtbcaNEHb7NZUOBj3HhKFgIY8PD1AptAObHjsUNF5+jfEnl+5WjwyTZTIgDRiOrwn8LWOANQ 0JpR69t06uJwmiogQgnlYe36YFaauHGQZFa+L+R2zgnGn8TnR4C3tH7gNAef9+PKqgmJT5pN IkFzlDmZi05E9xzhj4WQ/OOsqU64eHL2PaDk+2TdfrzNwNFbkABJ+C7BHNAytQ6h9cpUbg== In-Reply-To: <87wmcm2sqc.fsf@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spampanel-Class: ham X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Simon > Let me share my reasoning, FWIW. When discussing such topics where I > don’t really feel personally concerned, I do not try to rationalize and > I refrain to ask myself if it is founded or not – slippery slope toward > time vortex –, and instead, I try to focus on what the change costs me > and I ask to myself if I can or if I cannot live with this change. > > Somehow, whatever if I rationally consider the rename deeply ridiculous > or highly important, or something in the middle, instead I answer: Ok, > it costs me nothing and I can live with this rename. Then I scrutinize > the details using the same frame. :-) I understand, but this way of thinking only encourages more decisions that many "can live with", but they are not meaningful. Also, what drains me from this is not only the fact that this is an unreasonable change in many levels, but the fact that those who push for it don't care about being reasonable but do care about winning and labeling others as "far right". Because that's what all this is about. Making others look like they are worse human beings because they don't match the political agenda of some (the only one that is right!). And this is simply disgusting. I reject not only the debate itself, but also its reasons and the way it has been conducted. I think it has been unfair to those who don't like the change. Of course, I can live with this. Same way those who ask for the change can live with 'master' (and have been doing so for almost 15 years in this community). I wouldn't say anybody is unable to live with one or the other. So, what are we doing here? It's just image. It's the same if someone proposes to put a "Free Palestine" flag in the Guix website. It's going to be an extremely divisive decision, that for no reason we need to take or even debate[^1]. But just proposing it is free internet points for the one who does. (Note that anyone can live with a flag, as they are not hazardous) Guix already pretty clearly stated we are against any form of oppression (one of my points has always been that the word `master` by itself does not oppress anyone). What else do we need to do? But hey! Calling people this and that during the process is all in order to encourage inclusion and make a healthy community. I can live with it, but I'm not convinced. --- [^1]: Don't we all agree on that? Isn't it superobvious? 100% of the world population does! DISCLAIMER: The point is not to debate about any current political conflict, but the fact that none of them are universal. The one mentioned in this email is the best case I could find to illustrate the problem, for obvious reasons.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Mar 2025 16:45:27 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Mar 18 12:45:26 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42758 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tua4E-0007q8-6Z for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 12:45:26 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x435.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::435]:44485) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1tua41-0007jl-EY for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 12:45:14 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-x435.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-39143200ddaso3766272f8f.1 for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 09:45:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1742316307; x=1742921107; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=VWZiEc8UySnJtJi2EVphM6IWIoPdbJRUyhfD9yz3RR4=; b=HGqfwNoyyQXzTe8DlB1q2ANPK5heBSZD9N500Z46FgxfvjYQbjA4szS3+5irDeVyRX HCE2mfp8OOdk5s6Xjbkqjk2XE8BdmSwyNup+4y0KzA5qJfe744T6hpTyOlcCWvuqnk9V kGRs7dSS8n+ylQqI59Jvick0p/ctmWwPL/HtDd/WHdiK8dyKjsddQYZcCg03qeix0Dch 7wDS047BUXXvKGruTC0vwPCGLw6uCmY4xGuITXISZnlr+ekns9Tx87cIzV0QaYNec9yd IhBFNMOGPiugH9umm8sGLYWpwfNi9DeNxGbNDpLqnqWsieiLbKrOxc1GuZfd4qkJm1RS qvWQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1742316307; x=1742921107; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=VWZiEc8UySnJtJi2EVphM6IWIoPdbJRUyhfD9yz3RR4=; b=fazlMp5P/yc35yGnaYDSmABEGyyEachRzHOvvm6Aa8o7JPi3qw5ocKCiAmKP/ahulq 8XZ+98gCcqz8d71RmzYv2eGTuSFHrJGSel4OccgddRFzs6v/YGqXc5NWan7Aw3yYQIq2 T5bGh5v4fSxgKd7P+Tiw+NtMJ4h+tbYkl7RqH4OVF4ysjkTbYwhlW6cXaWw83UaWKK4I IoLR0eyxRkEIpTeUMehIWvlhBnjzJ6l/hXNWM1VkfvTuQJo3K5oo0mtBat2edAlHEBEu uGDwDzEVkfAaiZCYXdxfVW7rWPvhtEwPkVyv/52ntdXHCrXjuRmwTWae2iyfonRkJeuX ws7A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxjFqhafps60Xhz/aQjBuKqxaE22L+7m7xDP4xk5euvW43wqB/9 GrSsTnnaIRrVutXyfBSGfuVulINA2NtTcQ9z/pKWg/XN2R3NzE9hmJhYsA== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncu9OCb0uLm53nS+ljrkGD9zKkQH20g5BeRfWLER4AaNIoK6vkacKeeiqkHSILe 2/teJNkB2W7R3o9O6KIALF8MGro3S2yMvac9AUtDiPFoq/84jyEh8ZuuG5hseoLjWrnt9OzTRkR d/3ayF3ciG5p9spTMqECYZg1hE+wthxvOThbWre+bBX/xzQ68+E/VBOc/tbGas9oaruYkboF2gZ Ym8Mb5zSNJ0beBZa7pHmeNnVx8vxTuIeJA8kWE/x9XqDcpyfe7Yx+Aiusa2n9zxkTp3yak9ULwB WHi8Vz8cGGDUlsD7nEDb8fPY3rTBLMPIYlJzkYsepCmq0fhabpZCbguzUwqhjDi6s05cM6dGAV/ h9xvLXQnot162qluldZP+T78Ldzr2DQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IENWUbwgFatfNmar/joFKCZeNJ9U2CjFiM8Zu1SiFlwo9vS5sl8MKfMEoxjWEe0GiQCUPiQyA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:2aa:b0:390:f400:2083 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3971a2a2ba7mr20838272f8f.0.1742316306898; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 09:45:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili (roam-nat-fw-prg-194-254-61-41.net.univ-paris-diderot.fr. [194.254.61.41]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-395c8975b83sm19198185f8f.52.2025.03.18.09.45.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 18 Mar 2025 09:45:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> To: Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN>, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>, Christopher Howard <christopher@HIDDEN>, Divya Ranjan <divya@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename the default branch In-Reply-To: <547c549d-970e-4331-8944-dc7a79698426@HIDDEN> References: <d835c85c709a393309e6cad4ab065d039f1e08af.camel@HIDDEN> <f072096c292546c760d1342aa7d4f6c950027da9.camel@HIDDEN> <87seocwh1p.fsf@HIDDEN> <87msej45ha.fsf@HIDDEN> <87wmdk8fpd.fsf@wireframe> <c2532d09-e54b-49fe-9ace-dca55239f394@HIDDEN> <d2db73de82bb7bb3a6589a4299287d02dc961c14.camel@HIDDEN> <547c549d-970e-4331-8944-dc7a79698426@HIDDEN> Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 17:44:59 +0100 Message-ID: <87wmcm2sqc.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Epa Ekaitz! Hi Christopher, all, On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 11:48, Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN> wrote: > This debate is draining me, so consider me done here. [...] > I am not convinced. Personally, the only question I ask to myself is: Can I live with =E2=80=9Cmain=E2=80=9D as the branch name? Or cannot I live with it? Let me share my reasoning, FWIW. When discussing such topics where I don=E2=80=99t really feel personally concerned, I do not try to rationalize= and I refrain to ask myself if it is founded or not =E2=80=93 slippery slope to= ward time vortex =E2=80=93, and instead, I try to focus on what the change costs= me and I ask to myself if I can or if I cannot live with this change. Somehow, whatever if I rationally consider the rename deeply ridiculous or highly important, or something in the middle, instead I answer: Ok, it costs me nothing and I can live with this rename. Then I scrutinize the details using the same frame. :-) Cheers, simon PS: > Guix is a Catalan surname, maybe some of them are uncomfortable by its=20 > name, we should change it too! Ah I didn=E2=80=99t know=E2=80=A6 That=E2=80=99s why: https://img.over-blog.com/300x282/1/50/22/38/chats/chats2/Lepic-guix-100.JPG Raymond Guix is a painter in Paris. :-) Good to know.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Mar 2025 18:15:52 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat Mar 08 13:15:52 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56734 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tqyiF-0004r9-UZ for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2025 13:15:52 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-x731.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::731]:50634) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <aaron.covrig.us@HIDDEN>) id 1tqyiC-0004qs-Qa for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2025 13:15:49 -0500 Received: by mail-qk1-x731.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-7be6fdeee35so588536485a.1 for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 08 Mar 2025 10:15:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ieee.org; s=google; t=1741457743; x=1742062543; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:organization:message-id:subject:to:from:date:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=6HPkruKvomM5VzjzNE5/2sUi6I6jxf6gqOXzh3YFWfM=; b=DNlYtbZkfKV/0ZN1z0G9ZHbMHNVZ/xbSwQCnLOzJ/6k+SA8xrkANkxRoG0C6TES9Jy p5NKHcQBvsA5l0gwLYPA994w9QFDF+RXxpWlncLIhG50fnuFzHyP+NvZEO/DGtC+/WLw /S4Cw/PvVu9VGbvNgiI96/N/m54HVkasZDKxY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1741457743; x=1742062543; h=mime-version:organization:message-id:subject:to:from:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=6HPkruKvomM5VzjzNE5/2sUi6I6jxf6gqOXzh3YFWfM=; b=n2/ICslmajx69Xgv6KUDM37ei706TgvCpf5kudDphkY09vJE62jcXY82A97K3FbY6g UwDM7bqR4ZKzeueuZADx4+IRMTiDLxLzLrVEpd95r5aH/9I+JWLQWaFR3BGeYg6uUXZI JYZ4DTJoNe8PTIXP5F3bDedxrzzElivHTm7qbXH40BvFPq3Wgnl4BLo6XF0gev30bPLy iklEaCFgsFRSBkTJTMsK4J7sgll0OrGiGu2UqA2aJFCEfxCVN3yO1svcg9HUBnsU52G4 TYSxKaxWxL+6q+UWHbS7rw6r95qrBPlDLH5/O5bcY0f173/4Ivv3DJpdMOuyww5p7Vp0 T3Qg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Ywtw0F2Firg8T/oxi9Vxt6JQh5uIQLCEQD2gAHskIq0QxKfmZnj SCWZgoC67oiPwtsQ6ay+HS7N9esl3Khrhx+i81AKq3YnekCBxGyh3rqbd7KWWDBkoGK0fgiEwhU EOQRHgiIXE/8D5T4g7Jg5DJgAic+YqkWQuUAhX5eyw9rHJ3canaswbFSB09EBFP1pP0/ZvGtA18 nu3fcIxKQ3o2rhzv8T2aRtVb/heJUf516DJ3C2XSE= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvfuty4BeZBdr7QGCBv2klbMzYnwsysNG/QmR0tAhdGAW1AU2nnL6CC4tlKbkR 2x0ZdoEHeiq624k4W84LQlgtYEVXpM+QKmJLTLIFXSkwRSsye4lJNE7cU5LE5281XVWyEjZ/ITi JX+JoC4UVEPZJ7k7vbuxp2M0dCAznOegMKi4XP0m30np4iSk7lM5FwaS5PylpRoWOSdLTDQrPj/ hlS2LeDQWqhpn4Xh2AguuxfhTGnKD8XyrJDdNwAWuBLIwUYGpvazu4lhEQhJump6IxuLv79fhhL ctXhiSeBqQR6XiKRs+4JT9oRzI8oNlmAGRH3rgm5UO3LvVSCjDweHe1PIxXGhglX5uc9HIk4mMR UHn55rosi9JXYOYa/EnLKzzGlevg1a1CQOQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF2P+Lyv2m54GZZbFqtjhTdwGAVEC/NTy3nXIn6uZKKxED5WYYqsZJMUSdoNnFobaU3z0F2HA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:2581:b0:7c3:d5a4:3df3 with SMTP id af79cd13be357-7c4e6112241mr956105485a.34.1741457742584; Sat, 08 Mar 2025 10:15:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from mobile-dev (pool-71-244-152-222.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net. [71.244.152.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id af79cd13be357-7c47d66273bsm298943285a.69.2025.03.08.10.15.41 for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 08 Mar 2025 10:15:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2025 13:15:23 -0500 From: Aaron Covrig <aaron.covrig.us@HIDDEN> To: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Alternate name Message-ID: <20250308131523.36c4a966@mobile-dev> Organization: IEEE X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.41; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/iG7I3_w1uhBb2=k8_Ey_Yoo"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --Sig_/iG7I3_w1uhBb2=k8_Ey_Yoo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm not overly opinionated on this; although I would slightly prefer to keep as is for consistency (and that I feel most arguments of this sort are a bit contrived). If the name must be changed I'd vote against 'main' and go for something like 'stable' as I feel it describes the use case a bit better than 'main' does. The usage of 'main' to me can be slightly ambiguous as it raises the question, 'main of what?' vs 'stable' which indicates usage better IMO. v/r, Aaron Covrig --Sig_/iG7I3_w1uhBb2=k8_Ey_Yoo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQSPXVwROJGaYSBOwhhfTkc5aZTD/QUCZ8yJOwAKCRBfTkc5aZTD /RuZAQCo328rJ+Dx59zPiCCrvHHkp7UVdJfXZnTUed6P1FRkFQD/SasJNtrftGat rYKvSffjia3Y2N1PjjH2hyfTz3eBfQw= =hR0l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/iG7I3_w1uhBb2=k8_Ey_Yoo--
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Mar 2025 17:06:40 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Mar 07 12:06:40 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49839 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tqb9k-0002HX-BJ for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2025 12:06:40 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x42f.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42f]:59688) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1tqb99-0002FQ-Tu for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2025 12:06:06 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-38f2f391864so1196184f8f.3 for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 07 Mar 2025 09:06:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1741367158; x=1741971958; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=NIKmxxLIpkkkVMr4CDQ9Z7MRkIEj6U+kEXb9a4lvrLQ=; b=EqSfThZY8AZThU78M4xNK0eJdaC8sG9s/mlVcZfRPUzBN+G1BHLKpTtN0uZR15OMZ2 dAun5/0o1M0LD8AL22LSV5DjQTJOJNyo0zNbLAsxvAd9GIW7UMwvBxnrUHigj9WI3/kW gL38R+mZsJsbbnkgTII/W79Yl+pyIttp3vnEVIvOiaGUZl6UZkJmfr+QSIUIEOo2WOAn 3zcKa4HTthMNZwCL5zHWFAOFTSIj3/MBvNspqY5YXIlZ6EMPYUf+d6Z0Bt9egw2E9Ihg Xod6Xj1YlH99Ju3eGt4c2vLaD2oYujc/sMkOT5JHLte9txBOshTuoEFT7swnZPTPuk2d gUkg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1741367158; x=1741971958; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=NIKmxxLIpkkkVMr4CDQ9Z7MRkIEj6U+kEXb9a4lvrLQ=; b=k0VAQ04HHpt+HilNjxl5LLLxZ8ko2xMp6lOs1AsFn56X6jJOwgNBRqN0ryBTg93CUq ghnjzlXm9t79BUO2laHSD/hgmBHDQF+vSbMUquDTrroDGGf9T0TzBJtbldUcXJ7JBWFm IdWh38VuiWRzwRaFZgV0u9h4ozzlgIXqVssfcQrgme7bv9nvOVB/G26Oo3pUhf549smJ 2FbRht3Y6O1wCmnCO/I9iIrqqcE3PLJX79etS+3PHAXCpxV0R8akdRSAJSZwSqpazByI 7sPCJkzS/wzjZ+1qRGVNqEof6ahNa02dTLtmtQvQoKIJzhgkzknnrTAsOpr5SUC7ddVI uQEA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyoXUP+na0PfcIm1ea3V3VsCLmgT/ZzzbGt/P6SPnJSXATRCia3 x519Djqf57zcSAnsF4M58ONzYExEyFRjKePR3NG84rbQqFqnBsPnFV8h8g== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncttVjSmcJFPtp9P9ahWBd5QzBYhk05jKvh7i4l4RJhhb/vWz/lQpuM8bZ86Ju4 ikJxXQbshdo3/hYmKsUPvhM+rm4sShpf7JzybkLwygM5y3qOWX2lA0ty/1oWferukWy1ntTmk9K qmEVKZKbXm7EL1DHGFH5Gvk7iaqvfRy/5gADFZbHyXWZgwd4qgQS4DByOr86mT+WqEHs/hl4G0q db2SSTNm2ubrfOxlOOn6ZQj1RmCcTSXwBnQWY5ncD97wJYiNIyMx0vcWORlWN50Co8rnTUqEbn1 jG7Ihldc7RAT1uLMrPZNuaEEn9/VdiIANhsC4ugjr3Wf X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE4DtDOP8K/QJ0JW7nct9iVP1hDBdPAj8kuoPCrwYWxpFEBbboGqVvkLkvWDxmvBXmWqADN3Q== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6d09:0:b0:391:34:4fa9 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-39132b56eccmr3454744f8f.0.1741367157449; Fri, 07 Mar 2025 09:05:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from pfiuh07 ([193.48.40.241]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-3912c015a29sm5823275f8f.42.2025.03.07.09.05.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 07 Mar 2025 09:05:57 -0800 (PST) From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] A better name for the default branch In-Reply-To: <87o6ys3eom.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> References: <b900cd17b88123af3ae95f4e7d572e540f86e879.camel@HIDDEN> <79bad06a6410932dd6c7785256fd589cfaff40f6.camel@HIDDEN> <87o6ys3eom.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2025 16:39:30 +0100 Message-ID: <87ecz84zpp.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 at 15:42, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@HIDDEN> wrote: > Consider this scenario: I have a machine that I upgrade once every two > months. By the time the switchover is done, my machine still has > =E2=80=98master=E2=80=99 in its =E2=80=98%default-guix-channel=E2=80=99 i= n its Guix. Thus, when I run > =E2=80=98guix pull=E2=80=99, I=E2=80=99ll end up pulling =E2=80=98master= =E2=80=99, which (the GCD does not > clarify this) will either fail because the branch has been removed > altogether, or will give me an old snapshot. After the end of the grace period, I propose to introduce a commit, thus to have master as a fork of main, and such commit would teach =E2=80=99update-cached-checkout=E2=80=99 to automatically switch. The only question is about dealing with authentication; well it requires a special care. But it appears to me doable since both master and main would be authenticated. > Thus, I think the GCD should propose to keep updating the =E2=80=98master= =E2=80=99 > branch as a mirror of =E2=80=98main=E2=80=99 for, say, a year (a cron job= can take care > of that). Even one year isn=E2=80=99t enough. ;-) I=E2=80=99m not sure to run =E2=80= =9Cguix pull=E2=80=9D once a year as root. And many irregular users will have an old snapshot. Just to me mention that new issues are still reported about v1.2.0 released=E2=80=A6 Sorry I=E2=80=99m too old to remember such ancient time.= ;-) Cheers, simon
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Mar 2025 17:06:40 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Mar 07 12:06:40 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49837 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tqb9j-0002HM-Ta for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2025 12:06:40 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x336.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::336]:55310) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1tqb9A-0002FT-VL for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2025 12:06:06 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-x336.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-43bcad638efso12750585e9.2 for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 07 Mar 2025 09:06:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1741367159; x=1741971959; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=atKpF2vsngEk+jnptSt/J0YjbNV9J/gKgYwziw3wqnQ=; b=PhxtBTp8oCpFjNCIsHK3huKJ6ZTAUvTJQC6JWtvpMadYFj+ZsS9Q954m/XPzcEZa9Y Q6DY+5rwSfdi/wcy9U/y8EQQxWb6AdwQTVTyP726ew9J5z9iF02BPciJ/rNCU39vmZpc bBYxDNBgo3fcumX3t3965XJZcFmt08t2mS/vnY9JyYb5u0mPVvQL0MFDjjZhhahxitnn Nt3B4Sl57qTdGcBWi0YmWFsDcu6VC7w1GJ+C7Ox4xSfODgU21gk9Bykzp3xrtL4SfAwI EByjAyffZLewqJjWDOCUqht631EKXQ+Hp3sBnv/utLPIcrk4IGYthuAcWgoIDbYhtu+u fJZg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1741367159; x=1741971959; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=atKpF2vsngEk+jnptSt/J0YjbNV9J/gKgYwziw3wqnQ=; b=HzE1FqRcJeMmp3pMrR8DjpPBc7kPm+n1H0CLvqKKSQGqdU48PyJefkd5KXcXPXJ2U3 nUzzsaTgqkDyLMfI4T+qspWkZU+uRL0rR71torhNwcKtETqJfXJO4piryzQHPWZDV7cM eJkah6UTVw972lbwDSXI9pohvTwu9dEZRdATZoic6/yWUqv9RKjG/zoNUnl1n8Ln3GRi s+03kLDAPBNCd9Ylx+lkFI1YuCOvAiwLErUFDoke176QE2ZXKg4XyXW6uqaRK+9v8zs1 NkqSMtW64iBhnDG8x1IIN6gQ0O5Fv/C3H3vmOgh11RayEYbQClaMb/C914g3/8qg+0uW Q82w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YynU+2o4OzMhpOYKq72pNP7SnTv2xV8QBMdl+WMJiqxczp4b/cs vHaj3YFRQW7lSVWoFJMz73se1+UG33Cn6+pTDB+qyHCc7vhbUjkIMu+cCw== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsx+BbCesOVUEFO5Lo2e6ogwmJ9OYH0qxQL9DgtvdApUO6PRkeScnef4Wmswug AoEnDwfaGIUAtiHJWdcckd9w2uavesv19STXm68l7U2O6+Ep8TAHqhMNA2SXl0Osttt2GpHRb0U ER8465MXRpcxQymXy0dsSa7VR2pduzh/PzRjhSgMrqQoXuaIx3sff3o3IAThuyFSZ3ju26HzIs0 CIP1EV3zR2cpSKqx8Pk3CyVIHMvjgl3paIW1yv4YbeP6s0qbNeIvGG3PEsnWPQ8rdhEl6zEHUWD jqBS5vedud2Sfv0DSZnV4cMx32P8TXuuBH3S5ri/NN3/ X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHzJ+Ki7IiK+3RCofP18k/voE1QGOP5IwP0kr+F9FJ424RsCeX8F5QiuRvSW7lh6Jp9Gtk7oQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:45d1:b0:43b:d0fe:b8ac with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-43c686f96a0mr33824255e9.30.1741367158648; Fri, 07 Mar 2025 09:05:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from pfiuh07 ([193.48.40.241]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-43bd4352fa3sm86491415e9.30.2025.03.07.09.05.58 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 07 Mar 2025 09:05:58 -0800 (PST) From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> To: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] A better name for the default branch In-Reply-To: <87ldtnml3k.fsf@HIDDEN> References: <b900cd17b88123af3ae95f4e7d572e540f86e879.camel@HIDDEN> <79bad06a6410932dd6c7785256fd589cfaff40f6.camel@HIDDEN> <87ldtnml3k.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2025 17:06:23 +0100 Message-ID: <877c504ygw.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Tomas, On Sun, 02 Mar 2025 at 17:51, Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> wrote: > Was there any study or statistics about this topic? > > The two black people I have asked consider the whole "master -> main" > branch rename ridiculous, and me, descendant of people after who the > Slavery institute is named (Slavs), also do not care. So I am curious > whether there are any hard data on this topic. [...] > Since this GCD is all about feelings, let me point out that some people > do have negative feelings about the "main" as well. It is a politically > charged name, so I am not sure it satisfies the goal of "Guix > contributors, as a whole, feel comfortable with". Since this appears to me the premise for the rest, let be sure we have this premise. :-) 1. Can you live with =E2=80=9Cmain=E2=80=9D as the branch name? Or cannot you live with it? 2. The same question for these people. Let me share my opinion, FWIW. When discussing such topics where I don=E2=80=99t really feel personally concerned, I refrain to ask myself if = it is founded or not =E2=80=93 slippery slope =E2=80=93, and instead, I try to fo= cus on what the change costs me and I ask to myself if I can or if cannot live with this change. Somehow, whatever if I consider the rename deeply ridiculous or highly important or something in the middle, instead I answer: Ok, it costs me nothing and I can live with this rename. Then I scrutinize the details using the same frame. :-) Cheers, simon
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Mar 2025 17:06:39 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Mar 07 12:06:39 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49835 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1tqb9j-0002HJ-EF
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2025 12:06:39 -0500
Received: from mail-wm1-x32b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::32b]:57846)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>)
id 1tqb99-0002FO-2h
for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2025 12:06:05 -0500
Received: by mail-wm1-x32b.google.com with SMTP id
5b1f17b1804b1-43bc63876f1so17879955e9.3
for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 07 Mar 2025 09:06:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1741367157; x=1741971957; darn=debbugs.gnu.org;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references
:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
:reply-to; bh=SFRr5zTMd3wAa69RC7jU1XdS0H538MgRmrQTJv1frdQ=;
b=b4q0YNCWTHJe13Lobxjj78aLAfIj2Eq7eGBzmiiEgu9RJ9NA7VsY4seXttLr0tLx+T
AkJGE2Vuqg8+M/ipRrNPpugL++7MeMLBkJ17ZfzAAzXnqMnVAkSt16jpC/eJIeMFfeWZ
5I2ALSDuxyEYhDkohEkvKq949th1bR9nMJ5vifXqe4MDOxhhbXVxwAQCb/FO6oYIiZ5Q
mBALq5fLH/Ki7UeyDMmW78Mg3W7h9b1khpoiDLXJhTjXuPcSFe9iMnTol+rDsqxYWxCu
WPirKzcs2aeJYeutj4p0Ihup/1DXSdfGst9GNq76wDVx3KRQTj2dbA2s1DlTkAn9j/MJ
zh6Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1741367157; x=1741971957;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references
:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=SFRr5zTMd3wAa69RC7jU1XdS0H538MgRmrQTJv1frdQ=;
b=VKsIKWIJqe2PnQB+VDhTthHHxbBHdHhEbSOaDlV3Tf3BBOkroQIDcMtOloqo2vTyN5
Re9+SwaD0pE0lYmSw8vra9aJr/pwmkpJ7JfJ4fYFHpPBnajjY9gTjCXfzkit58rPEzsQ
7IZa55GKRTl2HUcnkWcjeTiGdcUok5Z36f+dVrMHstRiK7/D6JQqOGuB2NJPdqsi0cOV
+sFVkfzo9GRQ4lX7gXuDSejgP6AFZXE1zRoUkyCq64iFAZYH5GF7iOYsRa+ioQ8mf3PW
L+BVM5pSCcaWbti4zD2nD9A3VPvUshis5VZH7+m2RXB8nXf0SCvV6iyX85fCCmi2U6U4
1ZcQ==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1;
AJvYcCVP/XkUC6M2ZnPINWhCk+N54eyuDziyAUFQVrKirMkXdQvM2RBqtoDvQiMIHfpve0ZiEhPONw==@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzSlRLUOv0BreaQ7RYCvS+gTWDYt/eaoeNgUOtL8rKIXJadvm7i
pRS6zUNaFvdwCJ59C5aAas8cRXCNecpuLCYwycKkXaiRI7gb0lJ3M6d6UQ==
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncu0BerGFpB6VVKJ3P/enJOjhDzuouXg7nllKDkzl6dtGK0vuG5VcGLOQCdwVTC
u3DIPIdgIaJ3Qm4K9pcBLoIV2VYYDdTBqlKqCVGz6OarJA32aXK55ZuzLJ4EemHwolmkKKkc6YV
0ufVQe/k7qLFUfdsG1tw6AHTPkXmz7NBriyeJe1lCjXMQfDLG2huokoYyg0wc8JbbiC4fmC3Zzb
RnlgUBc51bR6LsGLDhYYnQwfAgzfdi9QReHlX9Zy4avwXGPy9OtNEDU/3eE/P/nShk/Fy5ckqsc
M3n/0ViYgszM9lw8OG22F1bf0sJSFpFZjsjGRYvd58Ne
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGeRfhGafM9qHcdKi0dOlVR7IDmZT7bK/fWwaebQ06Jk46xwHLGHIcuH1tzLY/Jykb8aAymbQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3553:b0:439:8bc3:a698 with SMTP id
5b1f17b1804b1-43c601cdc45mr29835865e9.6.1741367156608;
Fri, 07 Mar 2025 09:05:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pfiuh07 ([193.48.40.241]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
5b1f17b1804b1-43bdd93c9e3sm57149935e9.25.2025.03.07.09.05.56
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
Fri, 07 Mar 2025 09:05:56 -0800 (PST)
From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>, 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] A better name for the default branch
In-Reply-To: <b52d4742266f6ace2d9eadf6490ed9a833434244.camel@HIDDEN>
References: <b900cd17b88123af3ae95f4e7d572e540f86e879.camel@HIDDEN>
<79bad06a6410932dd6c7785256fd589cfaff40f6.camel@HIDDEN>
<875xl3rwn2.fsf@HIDDEN>
<b52d4742266f6ace2d9eadf6490ed9a833434244.camel@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2025 16:27:43 +0100
Message-ID: <87ikok509c.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407
Cc: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
Hi Liliana,
On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 20:56, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.=
com> wrote:
>> Therefore, maybe we could imagine that the last commit pushed master
>> introduce a double pull.
>>=20
>> Assume I still run this 056910e and we are after the grace period.=C2=A0=
I
>> run =E2=80=9Cguix pull=E2=80=9D so it fetch the last commit of master.=
=C2=A0 Now, when I
>> run again =E2=80=9Cguix pull=E2=80=9D, I will get the last commit of mai=
n.=C2=A0 This
>> second pull could be transparent for me.
>
> I don't think we should do this for two reasons:
>
> First, the "double pull" commit would be introduced to master only,
> which would break authentication of the main branch pulled this way.
At this end of the grace period, you have a direct path from the HEAD of
=E2=80=99main=E2=80=99 to the authenticated commit. And you also have a di=
rect path
from the HEAD of =E2=80=99master=E2=80=99 to the authenticated commit.
Assuming, this commit with =E2=80=9Cdouble pull=E2=80=9D lives only in =E2=
=80=99master=E2=80=99 and
=E2=80=99master=E2=80=99 forks from =E2=80=99main=E2=80=99 =E2=80=93 fork b=
ecause it holds the very commit.
I do not know the detail about switching from an authenticable branch to
another authenticable branch. Because indeed, the HEAD of both branches
=E2=80=99main=E2=80=99 and =E2=80=99master=E2=80=99 would not be in the sam=
e closure.
Hum, something I need to check for my understanding. :-)
> Second, we would have to break Guix itself to introduce arbitrary code
> execution for this particular code =F0=9F=98=89
Why? We only need to introduce a special case in
=E2=80=99update-cached-checkout=E2=80=99, no?
Somehow, we would have:
* main
| * master
|/
* End grace period
so we could have something like introduced in the =E2=80=99master=E2=80=99 =
branch.
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
guix/git.scm | 2 +-
modified guix/git.scm
@@ -653,7 +653,7 @@ (define* (update-cached-checkout url
#:cleanup-period
%checkout-cache-cleanup-per=
iod)))
=20
- (values cache-directory (oid->string oid) relation)))))
+ (update-cached-checkout ... #:ref `(branch . "main") ...)))))
=20
(define* (latest-repository-commit store url
#:key
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Well, modulo the former question about authentication. :-)
> Perhaps instead, we can on the Git side "redirect" the master branch to
> main. This would avoid the double pull, and it would be truly
> transparent. Perhaps the following sequence of commands would achieve
> just that. (CC'ing Denis for their expertise)
Yeah, who can more can less. :-)
> Am Mittwoch, dem 19.02.2025 um 02:12 +0100 schrieb Denis 'GNUtoo'
> Carikli:
>> $ git checkout origin/master -b temporary
>> $ git push origin HEAD:main
>> $ ssh root@server
>> $ cd /path/to/repository.git
>> $ git symbolic-ref HEAD refs/heads/main # Change the main branch
>> $ git symbolic-ref refs/heads/master refs/heads/main # Make master
>> point to main
>
>> This might avoid: Oops why don=E2=80=99t I get the last?=C2=A0 Because y=
ou=E2=80=99re
>> after the grace period. :-)
>>=20
>> I don=E2=80=99t know if my suggestion is worth.
>
> Fair point. Double-pulling is a source of annoyance in other package
> managers, so we should do our best not to make it affect too many
> users.
Assuming we are allowed to do that on the server hosting the Git
repository.
Cheers,
simon
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Mar 2025 21:11:02 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 05 16:11:02 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40092 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tpw17-0003fJ-RA for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2025 16:11:02 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x342.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::342]:46386) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>) id 1tpw15-0003ew-3l for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2025 16:10:59 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-x342.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-43bb6b0b898so36387855e9.1 for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 05 Mar 2025 13:10:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1741209053; x=1741813853; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vSs4MvUi1+tZP8FJ+0vjGmCmDiejCT0sVvnVdGfGoLU=; b=AROiaH+VM/IjTLCQ99I93fk4ZybDOe28t2I+IC7PKEWPYggPTyPxP09OYKPsxfjEFM /NASpnHhIGUG7FaSVH20PjVVbXD3PE6dOo0Q0OAfU2TKcjIpCW3j8QhLPiFtL6IgoVEk qCRIwgw55a0YBNPGy0C75DK3KMWQV5MN/yWlPXyNSDp4pnwIBYP5l/x6n3M3l+m+eRom IjbdINSPdcAvjug4l0mmlmfI2lFNH91O05lyVBrD/fEEakV9ZILsImCWvKugT5OGMXc/ KzaKcin4aikmwFedE4ORhdF2mzNFDgNT6CuuTZQoioW7tjcExR8bB7oGDL4XyzsDL8VJ k3+A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1741209053; x=1741813853; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vSs4MvUi1+tZP8FJ+0vjGmCmDiejCT0sVvnVdGfGoLU=; b=RJG8TUuzbwSLKh3oL+TEWitbJws09dOCNqlW/vbrLa+jSYmFZPRSzfgxMUufA2N8mx jvOKCs7IBmiymz9XHybqVjVFWqJEwRxRDjcIvQkKkW86Q52gcJDd/oMPHogLVfYLDdDd XoGWpCnb3d+fR5ykOxnNoMifWrz1ZXbku2xf7SstPZFmFeSf7H+okeG/evpBoW3T+J8d ScblzQ0gHnLxXqTr4HOmtf4gMFqZvkVzxCU5oI1xEHzPjYpWIau0tgqtqsQIJpmqgfTu m3eveM3VS6sZOi2JNIaz+0FfhAres7L1iTQL7fFqaJf6/cV/kZx1fAXj9gP04IZ/HqDf e6xA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YywOUXkzLOoSDtsqOSPrG9RjY4LJJcaGX+MPZcJZ0mIyyGZf+4x g4I1hNwHKp3k7Sj2V/tsU0a1vT/5fBjhKm7RsjMtX37wx4G53m7+ X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnct2t5M+DHoodwR7lRik+C3LAa9xM/BpUAyGa/tJPH6j0+OaqKDoi7o3EpXdcRM 8xblng8VY8Eg2/1o3I+DnGmrKqFmXzuS/FTdvrIJmCDMOOm0+LekdphFf8hPSlzxDSSyu9Mrn1p bt6ze2t8ErqyEsV0hGwdpW7t8fb9YrA9nNx+2w46QsvQBEptXFSz5K6M+rm0GIoDUSP1v0acEE+ yLTNcO17g5T77vkbQCUFKhVqY/uJ4DUVgw/mZ2oOPADfK6lC9nQ6g+fEqRQUSOGCpJnvvY8iVZj ZrdT8sf/gGvN2GKsVpR6bbEDaunVufLS+4Q/OYvenw6L7WVhb9i07YB+rGtW3JVbc26jvQ3QA0l jl2E9LFCjdlANfgBvkos4 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF+FwDe6G3VBExmlRjUtylpTShZNrVFm8jMHrcU4uZLlQjRIXRDBS8FMKiejWduN+TP5Wu2Yw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3b03:b0:439:98f6:8bc8 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-43bd2aea743mr30302125e9.26.1741209052718; Wed, 05 Mar 2025 13:10:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from lumine.fritz.box (85-127-114-32.dsl.dynamic.surfer.at. [85.127.114.32]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-43bd42c5ccesm28905615e9.19.2025.03.05.13.10.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 05 Mar 2025 13:10:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <0287032e89de1ed5f7a77416d5a338bcb78ef176.camel@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#76407: [GCD] A better name for the default branch From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> To: Ludovic =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2025 22:12:00 +0100 In-Reply-To: <8734g3ro8p.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> References: <b900cd17b88123af3ae95f4e7d572e540f86e879.camel@HIDDEN> <79bad06a6410932dd6c7785256fd589cfaff40f6.camel@HIDDEN> <87o6ys3eom.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <8fea9aa02c0dec4574686d636d92fd74997d2c85.camel@HIDDEN> <8734g3ro8p.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.54.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN>, 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello, Am Montag, dem 24.02.2025 um 23:07 +0100 schrieb Ludovic Court=C3=A8s: > Perfect!=C2=A0 Since the notion of major/minor release is fuzzy in Guix, > I=E2=80=99d suggest something like: >=20 > =C2=A0 2. two or more releases were made in the meantime. Adopted. I also extended the grace periods to allow daemon idling for longer, and added a section regarding other channels. Cheers
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Mar 2025 16:52:10 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 02 11:52:09 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33932 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1tomXw-0006Oc-Tf
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2025 11:52:09 -0500
Received: from wolfsden.cz ([37.205.8.62]:50432)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <~@wolfsden.cz>) id 1tomXr-0006NN-85
for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2025 11:52:06 -0500
Received: by wolfsden.cz (Postfix, from userid 104)
id 364AF357D48; Sun, 2 Mar 2025 16:52:01 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=wolfsden.cz; s=mail;
t=1740934321; bh=nqZ68BHP3vccfigSRUbph2MQmZr3Exzz7HG6oQ9PnZM=;
h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date;
b=XF3hY+uAZSabAMbRqTfDprLrHWY55Wl55v2bn26JyUh1VaT+cUXirrvJcbOTlyfFZ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X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on wolfsden
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,
DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,URIBL_BLOCKED
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Received: from localhost (unknown [128.0.188.242])
by wolfsden.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E20EF357F60;
Sun, 2 Mar 2025 16:51:59 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=wolfsden.cz; s=mail;
t=1740934319; bh=nqZ68BHP3vccfigSRUbph2MQmZr3Exzz7HG6oQ9PnZM=;
h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date;
b=wmIRfALdemM6NESDrBvRb5g0UnKM2qyKUn4X4GICr3jBmpwtgCdugJLT0xguODgLO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From: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>
To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] A better name for the default branch
In-Reply-To: <79bad06a6410932dd6c7785256fd589cfaff40f6.camel@HIDDEN>
(Liliana Marie Prikler's message of "Tue, 18 Feb 2025 23:14:29 +0100")
References: <b900cd17b88123af3ae95f4e7d572e540f86e879.camel@HIDDEN>
<79bad06a6410932dd6c7785256fd589cfaff40f6.camel@HIDDEN>
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2025 17:51:59 +0100
Message-ID: <87ldtnml3k.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407
Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> writes:
> Hi Guix,
>
> this patch introduces GCD 003 =E2=80=9CA better name for the default bran=
ch=E2=80=9D.
> I've taken the comments on guix-devel into account (most of them anyway)
> and updated the document accordingly. Note that references to GCD 002
> are made. That GCD was drafted earlier, but may or may not already be
> submitted by the time you read this. Do be patient :)
>
> Cheers
>
> ---
> 003-better-default-branch-name.md | 187 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 187 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 003-better-default-branch-name.md
>
> diff --git a/003-better-default-branch-name.md b/003-better-default-branc=
h-name.md
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..95952a5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/003-better-default-branch-name.md
> @@ -0,0 +1,187 @@
> +title: A better name for the default branch
> +id: 003
> +status: submitted
> +discussion: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/76407
> +authors: Liliana Marie Prikler
> +sponsors: Simon Tournier, Ian Eure, Vagrant Cascadian, Ludovic Court=C3=
=A8s
> +date: 2025-02-18
> +SPDX-License-Identifier: CC-BY-SA-4.0 OR GFDL-1.3-no-invariants-only
> +---
> +
> +# Summary
> +
> +Currently, much of Guix's development takes place on the =E2=80=9Cmaster=
=E2=80=9D
> +branch. This name is neither particularly meaningful nor inclusive;
> +choosing to use it may inadvertently alienate potential contributors.
> +To mitigate these effects, we should more clearly communicate, what the
> +default branch is all about.
> +
> +# Motivation
> +
> +It is well known, that Git works with whatever branch name one chooses.
> +However, for historical reasons, the default/initial/main branch for
> +development used to be =E2=80=9Cmaster=E2=80=9D =E2=80=94 particularly i=
n 2012, when the first
> +commit to Guix was made.
> +
> +Recent versions of Git support arbitrary initial branches and the
> +default branch name is subject to change upstream, at least in part
> +because the current default =E2=80=94 =E2=80=9Cmaster=E2=80=9D =E2=80=94=
may be perceived as harmful.
> +While the intended meaning is something close to =E2=80=9Can original, f=
rom
> +which copies are made=E2=80=9D, there are several other meanings of the =
word
> +that spring to mind more easily, some of have a racist or sexist
> +connotation.
> +
> +One goal of the Guix community is to foster a healthy community around
> +the software we use. Using clear language that does not pertain to
> +harmful stereotypes is a key towards achieving this goal. Thus, as a
> +proactive step, we should rename the default branch.
Was there any study or statistics about this topic?
The two black people I have asked consider the whole "master -> main"
branch rename ridiculous, and me, descendant of people after who the
Slavery institute is named (Slavs), also do not care. So I am curious
whether there are any hard data on this topic.
> +
> +# Detailed Design
> +
> +This section explains the chosen solution among the available options,
> +the scope of the proposed migration, and a migration path.
> +
> +## Scope of this document
> +
> +This document discusses only to change the name of the default branch,
> +not to change the branching strategy. Such ideas, e.g. to have a
> +=E2=80=9Cstable=E2=80=9D branch containing only bug-fixes and well-teste=
d features
> +and an =E2=80=9Cunstable=E2=80=9D or =E2=80=9Cexperimental=E2=80=9D bran=
ch would need to be discussed
> +in a separate document.
> +
> +## Choice of branch name
> +
> +In this section, we discuss potential branch names that have been
> +considered. The goal is to find a name that Guix contributors, as a
> +whole, feel comfortable with.
> +
> +While this GCD is still being reviewed, new suggestions may be added,
> +and benefits and drawbacks for each name discussed. Once this GCD is
> +accepted, these benefits and drawbacks shall be shortly summarized,
> +and a final decision with a short justification as the one at the end
> +of this section shall be the last paragraph of this section.
> +
> +- The currently used =E2=80=9Cmaster=E2=80=9D has more than ten differen=
t meanings,
> + some of them pertaining to slavery, others to dominance, and yet
> + others merely to skill and expertise. It is understandable that some
> + contributors would feel uncomfortable with this name, given that not
> + all uses are equally frequent.
> +
> +- The currently proposed alternative =E2=80=9Cmain=E2=80=9D has several =
meanings
> + relating to =E2=80=9Cimportance=E2=80=9D, the most obvious being =E2=
=80=9Cmost important=E2=80=9D.
Since this GCD is all about feelings, let me point out that some people
do have negative feelings about the "main" as well. It is a politically
charged name, so I am not sure it satisfies the goal of "Guix
contributors, as a whole, feel comfortable with".
> +
> +- Other alternatives would be =E2=80=9Ctrunk=E2=80=9D as a visual metaph=
or from
> + which =E2=80=9Cbranches=E2=80=9D spawn, and =E2=80=9Cbase=E2=80=9D wit=
h the same meaning.
> +
> +- =E2=80=9Cguix=E2=80=9D being the name of the project also serves as an=
option,
I like this one.
> + albeit one that is not clearly defined (are the other branches
> + not guix as well?)
But other branches are not Guix. If someone tells me "pull the latest
Guix", I would assume that means master branch (or whatever the new name
would be). I do not think anyone would go to the conclusion "oh, latest
Guix must mean rust-team branch, because it is also a Guix".
In my eyes other branches are not Guix, they are what Guix can become
one day.
> +
> +- Similar to =E2=80=9Cguix=E2=80=9D, =E2=80=9Cdevelopment=E2=80=9D merel=
y signifies that some sort
> + of development happens on the branch; a fact that should hold for
> + most, if not all branches.
> +
> +We choose =E2=80=9Cmain=E2=80=9D simply because it is currently the expl=
icit initial
> +branch for a git checkout as per `git-fetch` in `(guix build git)`.
> +Another name could be chosen by any means that support achieving a
> +consensus, e.g. comments on this GCD or a popular vote.
> +
> +## Manual Updates
> +
> +Sections 19 (Security Updates) and 22 (Contributing) of the Guix manual
> +would need to be reworded to reflect the new default branch. Other
> +sections mentioning =E2=80=9Cmaster=E2=80=9D branches may be reworded at=
any time
> +regardless of this GCD. Some mentions of the word =E2=80=9Cmaster=E2=80=
=9D are tied to
> +particular services and thus subject to rewording only once upstream
> +adopts a different terminology.
> +
> +## Repository Update Path
> +
> +For a complete list of repositories associated with the Guix project,
> +see GCD 002 =E2=80=98Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to Code=
berg=E2=80=99.
> +Most repositories can rename their default branch with no issue
> +(see also Cost of Reverting below).
> +
> +For Guix itself, we would decide on a **flag day** 14 days after
> +acceptance of this GCD at the earliest, and 30 days at the latest.
> +On that day, the main development branch would become "main".
> +A commit would reflect that by updating:
> +
> + 1. the `branch` field in `.guix-channel`;
> + 2. the `branch` field of `%default-guix-channel` in `(guix channels)`;
> + 3. any other reference to the "master" branch of the Guix repository
> + that may appear in the repository (in particular the Manual Updates
> + above).
> +
> +Following this commit, an entry in `etc/news.scm` would explain the
> +migration. The `master` branch would then point at the commit of said
> +news entry, and would need to be updated only after said news are
> +translated into another language.
Just to make sure, the "update" here refers to syncing the master branch
to what main is? So the histories would not diverge, it is just the
master would be behind. Is that correct?
> The `master` branch may keep following
> +the `main` branch for a grace period of 30 days anyways.
> +
> +Even after the `master` branch no longer syncs up to main, it may be
> +important to still have it pointing at some commit. Old installation
> +media, handcrafted `channels.scm`, external documentation and scripts
> +may all still be referring to the `master` branch even long after the
> +rename (see also Cost of Reverting below). To ensure that these do
> +not fail immediately, the old branch shall not be deleted until
Is there a reason to delete it at all? It will not be prominently
displayed anywhere, it would not be updated anymore, so is there any
harm (even to those people who would supposedly get offended by the
current branch name) if it just stays there? Only place where it would
be visible is listing all remote branches, which seems... acceptable?
Having it will allow even old setups to update, at the cost of double
pull.
Or, pushing bit further, is there a reason to not keep it updated? So
that people just can pick branch they feel the most comfortable with?
> +
> +1. at least one year has passed since this GCD has been accepted, AND
> +2. enough Guix releases have been made in the meantime, meaning
> + a. at least one major release, OR
> + b. at least three minor releases.
Given our current release cadence, this basically means the branch stays
forever, so you just as well may say so.
One thing I am not sure about are Guix packages in distributions. For
example, I do not know whether Debian would update Guix to new version
in already released version. So if Trixie is released with current
1.4.0, and we than make a 3 minor releases and delete the master branch,
will Debian users still be able to pull? (I think we have Debian
developer taking care of Guix here on the list, so maybe he can chime
in.)
Not sure what other distributions package Guix, and whether you care
about them in general.
> +
> +## Continuous Integration
> +
> +The jobset for the `master` branch would be removed and a jobset for the
> +`main` branch with the highest priority and the same set of architectures
> +would be created.
> +
> +## Relation to other Guix Consensus Documents
> +
> +Since this change has the potential to affect users and contributors in
> +ways that will disrupt their workflow for some amount of time as they
> +reconfigure their local checkouts to point at the new branch, it should
> +best be adopted as the same time as other, similar changes. In particul=
ar,
> +an adoption at the same time as GCD 002 =E2=80=98Migrating repositories,=
issues,
> +and patches to Codeberg=E2=80=99 is desirable.
I am not sure how this plays together with the timeline set above ("14
days after acceptance of this GCD at the earliest, and 30 days at the
latest."). What if this GCD is voted on before the GCD 002? Would it
not make sense to rephrase it to something like "14 days after
acceptance of this GCD or 14 days after result of vote on GCD 002,
whichever happens later"?
> +
> +The repository update path in this GCD is only valid as long as it is
> +simultaneously upheld by other, similar GCDs. Again GCD 002 =E2=80=98Mi=
grating
> +repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg=E2=80=99 needs to be consi=
dered as
> +a possibly simultaneous change. For the sake of clarity, the promises
> +made in the repository update path w.r.t. the availability of the old
> +branch shall not exceed those of any other accepted GCD and instead
> +be updated to match.
> +
> +## Cost of Reverting
> +
> +This change mostly affects contributors, who would have to run the follo=
wing
> +command once to pull from (and in the case of committers push to) the new
> +main branch:
> +
> + $ git branch --set-upstream-to <origin>/main
> +
> +Users of the `guix` CLI would be advised to run `guix pull` again to fet=
ch
> +the latest commit from the main branch. Users of old installation media
> +(e.g. disk images for version 1.4.0) would continue to use the "master" =
branch
> +and the default channel URL of said installation media until they run
> +`guix pull`. A new release may mitigate this annoyance somewhat.
These two paragraphs above seem to have no connection to "Cost of
Reverting".
> +
> +The main branch may be renamed to any other name (including "master") by
> +repeating the steps laid out in the Repository Update Path and
> +Continuous Integration above, using <name> instead of "main".
> +
> +# Drawbacks and Open Issues
One drawback that is missing here is the impact on scripting and tools
that people have on their machines. I have at least few scripts that
operate with origin/master that will need to be updated. I would not be
surprised if various crons that break will keep being discovered for
weeks or months after the rename.
It is valid to consider that an acceptable cost, but I think the general
fallout across the ecosystem should be recognized in this document, and
clearly declared as acceptable.
> +
> +There is an ongoing political debate as to whether the name =E2=80=9Cmas=
ter=E2=80=9D,
> +standing alone, should be considered harmful. Similar debates may
> +well surround other names given enough time and particular
> +circumstances. More generally, as language continues to evolve,
> +meanings that appear obvious today may no longer remain so in the
> +future.
> +
> +It is unclear, what effect, if any, the name of the default branch has
> +to contributor satisfaction.
In that case time spent debating this GCD and doing all the work it
would cause, would maybe be better spent on some outreach programs
and/or workshops for less fortunate people?
> The choice of a name may well appear
> +similar to choosing the colour of a bikeshed. What constitutes a
> +meaningful branch name will inevitably be a matter of opinion.
Have a nice day,
Tomas
=2D-=20
There are only two hard things in Computer Science:
cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors.
--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=K3jG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Feb 2025 15:46:28 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 28 10:46:27 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51082 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1to2ZH-0003fF-In for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 10:46:27 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-x230.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::230]:42329) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <code@HIDDEN>) id 1to2ZD-0003eI-Qa for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 10:46:24 -0500 Received: by mail-oi1-x230.google.com with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3f1c94936c5so1359003b6e.1 for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 07:46:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=greghogan-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1740757578; x=1741362378; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=RuS8b5YNCo2sn3QvY36dnhq5DOPEyUZ+8tK0xjC4DrY=; b=L1vR8oUESBuQhXncKO4xLScUMdECcB5Nb08c++/gHzCFihIb6wuzfojqkv54L5uux2 DeWeuwnv0vh3uGcj4H9/OLm716uWEGTPVpl/LA6jqooU1R4iX/TKWDYZurAJSO/w3L/h YH3wGLTiABEZVvMh58eVqP/+rZbxcvvuk1Sp816g2gNC3sX5vnhsdoKbzN0l3llZ7EJz tDtZ7M+ePZTfaETq97adNzz7HX+sr3qdDGxJuUAWArCWzBmiTeKAIpfHA+8T4YCYx41n iCBhJ4phZvntGsWb35UQddazp7DFRZFUOjZgYLuuYvuXqQC54aiAKh1Rc0GrblDwaIFS pTWA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1740757578; x=1741362378; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=RuS8b5YNCo2sn3QvY36dnhq5DOPEyUZ+8tK0xjC4DrY=; b=iTxlLQ/NuxoI/uKSORqVUff7+lZK+JuS0MlbjpETyEzIyLD6KtmqQforxnPN1u0A/i 1sOux9K2ci8tE775UFXGFRMfifzSmkaYuHtNl+fgIcSCr8qjnBMOOdyGFuWAq0JOFmfy uqRi5/a7ISW6QJcO1n0AeKCnGZeMJ0D5GKwgnUGQpe64TKOHmHNbcVUllyU8YO4WHKJV hu23mRdM+LUs2wQXLZl0G30IVoloSA8QLOmWqL59G2Da5qGVxsj3vCtGJ3lIDaLKhHOR hAb3gxBeqNH/jSSn1KKG0TVurw5aqPZUuARpeGLJ6c07qbK+vXKMHekCXq7Yxq+9N77c nmyw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzQqXh5/WpQG2O16urA4mgBSjm1VyC5oUmoBfI7kflWHBLH46s5 Ep5t8tPq9MlaNyHojZ4t4Zo+vKu3nm1AlcxVnT7EVmX3ijV7T5zY+pjX8J43xWTFi0B43j+wd0C O5CERwcO1qpkzrbLdXb6CQGRq5YYvGB0+Bk9hbw== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncv5mo7dozKeOLuRyKhXRMv5p3tAPW1sIbTNSAe+ua4BDq0GR15PwIP3HR6Cgnn rMmVbqDIbKhhcd4jaTg6IQH2+HsMNy3vxxDJ9fBrl9C+gs7pehmTpPknJ+/03V0OgISW93UgTIo rxYm+jM0Q= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHN9PhI5lwdJC84W0EO3mHDojun46XsxoVQrngoDXGdQeL0cSRIPPXTOhympZ8uJSRJeT38VTRVmESax6Aetwk= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:198c:b0:3e7:e38a:722b with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3f558003ddcmr2439096b6e.14.1740757577729; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 07:46:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <b900cd17b88123af3ae95f4e7d572e540f86e879.camel@HIDDEN> <79bad06a6410932dd6c7785256fd589cfaff40f6.camel@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <79bad06a6410932dd6c7785256fd589cfaff40f6.camel@HIDDEN> From: Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 10:46:05 -0500 X-Gm-Features: AQ5f1JqpeOg7Os350H5Qv-rB7uFNX_gwbM7RxwsbUs5jVChItS0MNonNbHb7t54 Message-ID: <CA+3U0ZmnhHSbd=sKRYVhYDJ+c4AJZBos91GKMwSAm7OEQ4Wmkg@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] A better name for the default branch To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 5:24=E2=80=AFPM Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> wrote: > > Hi Guix, > > this patch introduces GCD 003 =E2=80=9CA better name for the default bran= ch=E2=80=9D. > I've taken the comments on guix-devel into account (most of them anyway) > and updated the document accordingly. Note that references to GCD 002 > are made. That GCD was drafted earlier, but may or may not already be > submitted by the time you read this. Do be patient :) Thank you for this submission. I have yet to meet someone taking passive offense at the "master" branch but I do purposely mispronounce Guix from the project's pejorative. Perhaps I can offer that as a future GCD. And if we are to be offended, why whitewash history? We live privileged lives in the most privileged nations during the most privileged time in history. This is not the default state of the world, to die of old-age peacefully in one's sleep. All of our peoples were slaves, and all were slavers. More Europeans were trafficked to Africa in the Barbary slave trade than Africans to America in the North Atlantic slave trade. Only one of those two peoples survives. Can we find greater but narrower consensus around the practical motivation that 1) most users leave unchanged the git default "main", therefore "master" will become increasingly uncommon and unexpected, 2) the choice of "main" is masterfully similar when tab-completing or looking through a sorted list of refs, and 3) the move to Codeberg presents a hopefully rare opportunity combine disruptive changes? We do not need a comprehensive motivation if we can find consensus on the outcome. Greg
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Feb 2025 18:35:25 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 25 13:35:25 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48452 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tmzm8-0003W0-TT for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 13:35:25 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:34782) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1tmzm6-0003Q3-IZ for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 13:35:23 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1tmzla-0006Mb-Lh for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 13:34:58 -0500 Received: from fout-b1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([202.12.124.144]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1tmzlX-0006jY-KF for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 13:34:50 -0500 Received: from phl-compute-10.internal (phl-compute-10.phl.internal [10.202.2.50]) by mailfout.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D61211400DD; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 13:34:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-02 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-10.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 25 Feb 2025 13:34:46 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=mesmtp; t=1740508485; x= 1740594885; bh=QeH9v/uyU4GPbwY2C47/yRuXCzLlbVRqW+di6/wcgYg=; b=E tBLxREydvPPWcH0zgSMtH31ktaEobRFCSM8UQFMHPZtmOlREvckUgtpQG7m2q/Nu wVT2Qx2JSDA+WM9hdiocFiWQXL6Dc3WMzbni7uE2Zf473zKMhv0igTNUgh7EPYgK mh49+4pwdW7i0oYXXP270jAZhvzN8De2sLxqAXZPwM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1740508485; x=1740594885; bh=QeH9v/uyU4GPbwY2C47/yRuXCzLlbVRqW+d i6/wcgYg=; b=GQgMNARUq/B5sQxji6tY4TmyvYWm2zUppBFiL6d2qqZAdEdTzxC 7xBLUBIvqbE+ZGMDAWjKJXO5xqpIku5lU3sw3YYG7k9SJbqd8e7xDwty/CHH5YJj yZPb5/MltgQI5OwXEDal628SLUZGjvEiM19mYfrZrjeexoO4R1EhX7eGy3GcodWw FJGrq11EFrUCFRltc73cJIVgNlWqMJyO9RyAgcyOP2NX5U2SmqP22un6XnAoTdFn qF7QnRDHtFlXhlk7cxFBhHfJQOycb5w0TwvWsy9PM34SoxnzKbyn7v8x0nw3CIvY 2ltFq9GCGyjpAgp6K8PILQqSbVKCTLt860g== X-ME-Sender: <xms:RQ2-Z-HsP7FJaT_f3NTR83llJZv5phxorsUfKa8RhNZ8XMFSWbktjA> <xme:RQ2-Z_UdbKxRja7ElZHx_4oHFgAAmeWv9I_NprnCpDETLUzjjPTYPv7sSG1R2mbyp fUqp-34jbvVqmF-_A> X-ME-Received: <xmr:RQ2-Z4I3L5jffBE31W_8l_0qv8pca8UQwZL-4Cgpy_4f5pUAo0PyCFKY60PqN6hsdZVAOvsDgNhA_mKevlJ2drNZpcwSS-I> X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefvddrtddtgdekvdegfecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdp uffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivg hnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvvefukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertddttddv necuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnh grmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeiteduheefkeeufeelgeduhfejgfelheefleeu hfeffffgueduleehvdejleeiteenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmh epmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvpdhnsggprhgtphht thhopedvpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehguhhigidqphgrthgthh gvshesghhnuhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopeejieegtdejseguvggssghughhsrdhgnhhu rdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:RQ2-Z4HatGS0zZXdaV0Eq08pTGNERjEHxDeRDPHIAM5i8e7y3llnxg> <xmx:RQ2-Z0WzgOb2b0Ol11a-PCu6_RZ35H6rZKUZo9LYriP_bjleQ2njIg> <xmx:RQ2-Z7PuXmBJcRBwYerVdBiyv1T-yOQ5vGhmjRBznpExTn2ivXTuIA> <xmx:RQ2-Z70Fggwy7AQa4QOpPNhbdb_38_8pWaUVEUuMlSF8P7iG2tUbuA> <xmx:RQ2-ZxgEsybc7WV9s2T20YHoBQJlYKnlwKd-aO0dLypFPEAZ7wIILeBI> Feedback-ID: i819c4023:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 13:34:45 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 13:34:43 -0500 From: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> To: Roman Riabenko via Guix-patches via <guix-patches@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename the default branch Message-ID: <Z74NQ1wSjVq5YB1I@HIDDEN> References: <d835c85c709a393309e6cad4ab065d039f1e08af.camel@HIDDEN> <f072096c292546c760d1342aa7d4f6c950027da9.camel@HIDDEN> <87seocwh1p.fsf@HIDDEN> <87msej45ha.fsf@HIDDEN> <87wmdk8fpd.fsf@wireframe> <c2532d09-e54b-49fe-9ace-dca55239f394@HIDDEN> <d2db73de82bb7bb3a6589a4299287d02dc961c14.camel@HIDDEN> <547c549d-970e-4331-8944-dc7a79698426@HIDDEN> <f78d40758e1838026fb3e796f037e917c26f761f.camel@HIDDEN> <20250221153520.20b99610afcdf7bea76e9c6e@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250221153520.20b99610afcdf7bea76e9c6e@HIDDEN> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=202.12.124.144; envelope-from=leo@HIDDEN; helo=fout-b1-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 03:35:20PM +0200, Roman Riabenko via Guix-patches via wrote: > I would propose the word "release" instead. The word is already widely > used in guix to refer to published source code of stable versions of > software, so it should be easily recognisable and describe the purpose > of the branch accurately. This is the branch where the guix code is > realeased and where the guix releases are published. As I think your message highlights, it's not easy to come up with good names for things like this. And the harder you think about it, the harder it becomes. I think that most of the proposed names for this branch (master, main, trunk, base) are good enough. 'stable' and 'unstable' are too semantically specific to be accurate, and 'development' is too long :) But in my opinion, 'release' is not as good, because we already use the word "release" to mean something that's different from the 'master' branch. Although, our "releases" and our 'master' branch are both released upon the world with the suggestion that they should be used, unlike our other Git branches, so there is some similarity too.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Feb 2025 18:34:55 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 25 13:34:55 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48444 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tmzlf-0003P4-CX for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 13:34:55 -0500 Received: from fout-b1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([202.12.124.144]:48703) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1tmzlb-0003Oo-HF for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 13:34:53 -0500 Received: from phl-compute-10.internal (phl-compute-10.phl.internal [10.202.2.50]) by mailfout.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D61211400DD; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 13:34:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-02 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-10.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 25 Feb 2025 13:34:46 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=mesmtp; t=1740508485; x= 1740594885; bh=QeH9v/uyU4GPbwY2C47/yRuXCzLlbVRqW+di6/wcgYg=; b=E tBLxREydvPPWcH0zgSMtH31ktaEobRFCSM8UQFMHPZtmOlREvckUgtpQG7m2q/Nu wVT2Qx2JSDA+WM9hdiocFiWQXL6Dc3WMzbni7uE2Zf473zKMhv0igTNUgh7EPYgK mh49+4pwdW7i0oYXXP270jAZhvzN8De2sLxqAXZPwM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1740508485; x=1740594885; bh=QeH9v/uyU4GPbwY2C47/yRuXCzLlbVRqW+d i6/wcgYg=; b=GQgMNARUq/B5sQxji6tY4TmyvYWm2zUppBFiL6d2qqZAdEdTzxC 7xBLUBIvqbE+ZGMDAWjKJXO5xqpIku5lU3sw3YYG7k9SJbqd8e7xDwty/CHH5YJj yZPb5/MltgQI5OwXEDal628SLUZGjvEiM19mYfrZrjeexoO4R1EhX7eGy3GcodWw FJGrq11EFrUCFRltc73cJIVgNlWqMJyO9RyAgcyOP2NX5U2SmqP22un6XnAoTdFn qF7QnRDHtFlXhlk7cxFBhHfJQOycb5w0TwvWsy9PM34SoxnzKbyn7v8x0nw3CIvY 2ltFq9GCGyjpAgp6K8PILQqSbVKCTLt860g== X-ME-Sender: <xms:RQ2-Z-HsP7FJaT_f3NTR83llJZv5phxorsUfKa8RhNZ8XMFSWbktjA> <xme:RQ2-Z_UdbKxRja7ElZHx_4oHFgAAmeWv9I_NprnCpDETLUzjjPTYPv7sSG1R2mbyp fUqp-34jbvVqmF-_A> X-ME-Received: <xmr:RQ2-Z4I3L5jffBE31W_8l_0qv8pca8UQwZL-4Cgpy_4f5pUAo0PyCFKY60PqN6hsdZVAOvsDgNhA_mKevlJ2drNZpcwSS-I> X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefvddrtddtgdekvdegfecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdp uffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivg hnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvvefukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertddttddv necuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnh grmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeiteduheefkeeufeelgeduhfejgfelheefleeu hfeffffgueduleehvdejleeiteenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmh epmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvpdhnsggprhgtphht thhopedvpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehguhhigidqphgrthgthh gvshesghhnuhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopeejieegtdejseguvggssghughhsrdhgnhhu rdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:RQ2-Z4HatGS0zZXdaV0Eq08pTGNERjEHxDeRDPHIAM5i8e7y3llnxg> <xmx:RQ2-Z0WzgOb2b0Ol11a-PCu6_RZ35H6rZKUZo9LYriP_bjleQ2njIg> <xmx:RQ2-Z7PuXmBJcRBwYerVdBiyv1T-yOQ5vGhmjRBznpExTn2ivXTuIA> <xmx:RQ2-Z70Fggwy7AQa4QOpPNhbdb_38_8pWaUVEUuMlSF8P7iG2tUbuA> <xmx:RQ2-ZxgEsybc7WV9s2T20YHoBQJlYKnlwKd-aO0dLypFPEAZ7wIILeBI> Feedback-ID: i819c4023:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 13:34:45 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 13:34:43 -0500 From: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> To: Roman Riabenko via Guix-patches via <guix-patches@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename the default branch Message-ID: <Z74NQ1wSjVq5YB1I@HIDDEN> References: <d835c85c709a393309e6cad4ab065d039f1e08af.camel@HIDDEN> <f072096c292546c760d1342aa7d4f6c950027da9.camel@HIDDEN> <87seocwh1p.fsf@HIDDEN> <87msej45ha.fsf@HIDDEN> <87wmdk8fpd.fsf@wireframe> <c2532d09-e54b-49fe-9ace-dca55239f394@HIDDEN> <d2db73de82bb7bb3a6589a4299287d02dc961c14.camel@HIDDEN> <547c549d-970e-4331-8944-dc7a79698426@HIDDEN> <f78d40758e1838026fb3e796f037e917c26f761f.camel@HIDDEN> <20250221153520.20b99610afcdf7bea76e9c6e@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250221153520.20b99610afcdf7bea76e9c6e@HIDDEN> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 03:35:20PM +0200, Roman Riabenko via Guix-patches via wrote: > I would propose the word "release" instead. The word is already widely > used in guix to refer to published source code of stable versions of > software, so it should be easily recognisable and describe the purpose > of the branch accurately. This is the branch where the guix code is > realeased and where the guix releases are published. As I think your message highlights, it's not easy to come up with good names for things like this. And the harder you think about it, the harder it becomes. I think that most of the proposed names for this branch (master, main, trunk, base) are good enough. 'stable' and 'unstable' are too semantically specific to be accurate, and 'development' is too long :) But in my opinion, 'release' is not as good, because we already use the word "release" to mean something that's different from the 'master' branch. Although, our "releases" and our 'master' branch are both released upon the world with the suggestion that they should be used, unlike our other Git branches, so there is some similarity too.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Feb 2025 22:07:16 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 24 17:07:16 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43205 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tmgbc-0006OZ-2Y for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 17:07:16 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51434) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1tmgbY-0006OC-Ec for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 17:07:13 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1tmgbT-00066P-1t; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 17:07:07 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=9Xbbbp/isBdZxUSbJgp+kaxILulnU2QBAxcrwIg692M=; b=onvweor/eba5xSuO2gJI DuHLK/kX7zNoKGpyRK2mT52gPGh1wPx03i20CpvhNMiCJwjnfH6ixJfTurrxeqktvixqys7Tm9fCg E7m70Sm4G7TOv66eV+T57w+8KsTZ10EGsNdU+4lSWmg8s2VlPKM3BacjJgLCikGviiet1NUy5pS+e zXt0M36WCxXfai174PLOuKj1ccVQSgXINQdB0fuXaHFbRJKNrclwak38lvpt8YxdSQQzg3sbasIwl WYU777HWasNuJQx5xBCfy9Mw0zvrjfDnMZujf9IMElQWTkprxK7G9LGXTyxe8vWP+cQDA43z19qh6 xvvSr61UcnuJ1A==; From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#76407: [GCD] A better name for the default branch In-Reply-To: <8fea9aa02c0dec4574686d636d92fd74997d2c85.camel@HIDDEN> (Liliana Marie Prikler's message of "Sun, 23 Feb 2025 16:48:17 +0100") References: <b900cd17b88123af3ae95f4e7d572e540f86e879.camel@HIDDEN> <79bad06a6410932dd6c7785256fd589cfaff40f6.camel@HIDDEN> <87o6ys3eom.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <8fea9aa02c0dec4574686d636d92fd74997d2c85.camel@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 23:07:02 +0100 Message-ID: <8734g3ro8p.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hello, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> skribis: > Actually, the GCD does specify this: Oh right, sorry. >> Even after the `master` branch no longer syncs up to main, it may be >> important to still have it pointing at some commit. Old installation >> media, handcrafted `channels.scm`, external documentation and scripts >> may all still be referring to the `master` branch even long after the >> rename (see also Cost of Reverting below). To ensure that these do >> not fail immediately, the old branch shall not be deleted until >>=20 >> 1. at least one year has passed since this GCD has been accepted, AND >> 2. enough Guix releases have been made in the meantime, meaning >> a. at least one major release, OR >> b. at least three minor releases. Perfect! Since the notion of major/minor release is fuzzy in Guix, I=E2=80= =99d suggest something like: 2. two or more releases were made in the meantime. >> > +## Choice of branch name >>=20 >> I=E2=80=99m not convinced this section is necessary.=C2=A0 :-) > How do we achieve consensus on the proposed name itself, then? =E2=80=98main=E2=80=99 is an established and non-controversial name in this= context, which is why I thought we could omit the section. It=E2=80=99s no big deal though, we can keep it too. >> I don=E2=80=99t think this has to be simultaneous: both changes bring the >> potential for breakage if we=E2=80=99re not careful enough, but it=E2=80= =99s probably >> best to deal with a single class of breakage at a time. > Perhaps I am missing something crucial here, but IIUC most breakages > would result from the same record; with just one field between them.=20 > Since most configuration ends up being "fire and forget", reducing the > number of times they need to be edited sounds like a benefit to me. Hmm yes, maybe you=E2=80=99re right. The wording says =E2=80=9Cpossibly si= multaneous change=E2=80=9D so that leaves room. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Feb 2025 15:47:56 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Feb 23 10:47:56 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35601 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tmECx-0000By-FF for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2025 10:47:55 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x343.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::343]:57387) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>) id 1tmECt-0000Bd-Ae for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2025 10:47:53 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-x343.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4399a1eada3so31679805e9.2 for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 23 Feb 2025 07:47:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1740325665; x=1740930465; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=3dTTtf+97wl0Qg+D0vo6WMSr3RPnVCGdWXUY3iGQx0g=; b=MK2oK+65JZQs+W7CWveTPhaKCByo413lQtp9FQaeintMsOwTRnaOvB6XINTPLg/Kqr f3uK9a1Ndp5jrlkNZ/PpTu3hWuHmg8NPGk12jVK9AUm0Q4ifkZ80cWKwk8jaXlgdIH2J Bm5Bi57jeInhBi2fqIT0pRs12vMGZC+mp72ttHMWOF5SH8rf/VK30YAoZG3CBKG40SzF H8Q7cKFbW93OfsYM9tnaziUewE1F8z6CtAwszfyw1pQ+pXum8JpAbcvopSAQCoaTjPKw O6c557msnmFdCnWEKmTqcKLG8B9OTdZcwEirTlC4VVJbmrfT94qNm4QeMDuvFq9ZLzFp BYQg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1740325665; x=1740930465; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=3dTTtf+97wl0Qg+D0vo6WMSr3RPnVCGdWXUY3iGQx0g=; b=XpJ691VOjXArJXzXm8Ck4zuUUUXYb4EhMmYvIcqU3iG3pLKull/vwhll+ZdPpWmcpZ 9AI3TGfkvXdXXfsOmEhQzhNDZMrAFGQpHrDFB0vUWcXamYn62fKSFqLM+by47ZnvhJi6 ew83neR00FqRGPiyyRddAdOnIAhPTUt2+Dvwzlva9mDB94eNyeIFvH/0Ju6KYRUKPBUM dcbfqJTgTafez8WDKckVTKt9gtU3WIC8fWzbJ+NaAu5M0BASfYUInZpzxFHaNyo8GZ7Q jBSZnxwcNPXusikstIoFPvIwmM0onMmFNGX3Okr9oII+kQUHItXmPROrysFRXCzMlbFC 5akA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy9rB20z8UxKYWHxKI4MoJ4PdBomQWqnGQw+t5GUhPPJKl5rMmv u2P9PIsCIyv4tPMRoa+h1rhY9b/xY0TvgdKFl5tVy8+qnoubQv33akckddsj X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctoxXzAGkKVCBm20EE8hGXPv1G7F9GWNE4syjzsEvoDZwVyhXE46U5LH2ZUUx8 oCyRB0qTwowVPDj8Mya3CGpQGxiweBvSyUJczOnGfW8GTSJ4dEVKak5clh5P1kf6cCsrr27kEBV qvDJbumURDxIUuE1k4MzhUqf+yeL6DVVpQ9B25pnQIQaEV9oJzkGFogxg5aFZik5u+FP5XblVC8 3CuWMUYgttbahD1VdN/LsPNUiCk/oRlRjtIGnD6aAKCxw+P6S03Mvn73AfAJIelx+w59ubqZZvQ 8p2z5qB05ikIEdEvYzhRK4EVgKCl00BXi0X37PD6s+Mz8DER9LDuInLNJF8gvQczHA/+FOpFr9q mKw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGZDdnKx9nq9VmchL4GaGN2QZq6Z0FKf2fWd7uA1YOVJNapUsl7qiXGLAfkXoSdrgxOOBKXBw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:154a:b0:439:44eb:2d81 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-439ae1f34f8mr84176455e9.15.1740325664495; Sun, 23 Feb 2025 07:47:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from lumine.fritz.box (85-127-114-32.dsl.dynamic.surfer.at. [85.127.114.32]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-38f258b439dsm28940633f8f.8.2025.02.23.07.47.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 23 Feb 2025 07:47:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8fea9aa02c0dec4574686d636d92fd74997d2c85.camel@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#76407: [GCD] A better name for the default branch From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> To: Ludovic =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 16:48:17 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87o6ys3eom.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> References: <b900cd17b88123af3ae95f4e7d572e540f86e879.camel@HIDDEN> <79bad06a6410932dd6c7785256fd589cfaff40f6.camel@HIDDEN> <87o6ys3eom.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.48.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Ludo=E2=80=99, Am Sonntag, dem 23.02.2025 um 15:42 +0100 schrieb Ludovic Court=C3=A8s: > Hi Liliana, >=20 > Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> skribis: >=20 > > +For Guix itself, we would decide on a **flag day** 14 days after > > +acceptance of this GCD at the earliest, and 30 days at the latest. > > +On that day, the main development branch would become "main". > > +A commit would reflect that by updating: > > + > > +=C2=A0 1. the `branch` field in `.guix-channel`; > > +=C2=A0 2. the `branch` field of `%default-guix-channel` in `(guix > > channels)`; > > +=C2=A0 3. any other reference to the "master" branch of the Guix > > repository > > +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 that may appear in the repository (in particu= lar the Manual > > Updates > > +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 above). >=20 > Consider this scenario: I have a machine that I upgrade once every > two months.=C2=A0 By the time the switchover is done, my machine still ha= s > =E2=80=98master=E2=80=99 in its =E2=80=98%default-guix-channel=E2=80=99 i= n its Guix.=C2=A0 Thus, when I > run =E2=80=98guix pull=E2=80=99, I=E2=80=99ll end up pulling =E2=80=98mas= ter=E2=80=99, which (the GCD does > not clarify this) will either fail because the branch has been > removed altogether, or will give me an old snapshot. Actually, the GCD does specify this: > Even after the `master` branch no longer syncs up to main, it may be > important to still have it pointing at some commit. Old installation > media, handcrafted `channels.scm`, external documentation and scripts > may all still be referring to the `master` branch even long after the > rename (see also Cost of Reverting below). To ensure that these do > not fail immediately, the old branch shall not be deleted until >=20 > 1. at least one year has passed since this GCD has been accepted, AND > 2. enough Guix releases have been made in the meantime, meaning > a. at least one major release, OR > b. at least three minor releases. > Thus, I think the GCD should propose to keep updating the =E2=80=98master= =E2=80=99 > branch as a mirror of =E2=80=98main=E2=80=99 for, say, a year (a cron job= can take > care of that). Fair enough. Keeping it updated for one year and then phasing it out should give folks more time to adopt. > Also, instead of changing the =E2=80=98branch=E2=80=99 field, I would sug= gest > adopting and finalizing <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/49252> and > leaving =E2=80=98branch=E2=80=99 unset so that the server-side default br= anch is > taken. SGTM. > > +## Choice of branch name >=20 > I=E2=80=99m not convinced this section is necessary.=C2=A0 :-) How do we achieve consensus on the proposed name itself, then? > > +The repository update path in this GCD is only valid as long as it > > is > > +simultaneously upheld by other, similar GCDs.=C2=A0 Again GCD 002 > > =E2=80=98Migrating > > +repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg=E2=80=99 needs to be > > considered as > > +a possibly simultaneous change. >=20 > I don=E2=80=99t think this has to be simultaneous: both changes bring the > potential for breakage if we=E2=80=99re not careful enough, but it=E2=80= =99s probably > best to deal with a single class of breakage at a time. Perhaps I am missing something crucial here, but IIUC most breakages would result from the same record; with just one field between them.=20 Since most configuration ends up being "fire and forget", reducing the number of times they need to be edited sounds like a benefit to me. > Also, perhaps clarify that this GCD is valid whether or not GCD 002 > is adopted. Sure. Cheers
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Feb 2025 14:44:24 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Feb 23 09:44:24 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60078 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tmDDU-0004kw-IH for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2025 09:44:24 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57266) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1tmDDS-0004kZ-A6 for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2025 09:44:22 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1tmDDN-0006m9-0m; Sun, 23 Feb 2025 09:44:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=Fwf27XeRtxeHpcQ6OOwcDcd28b3FQkwt0FtYWoe78rc=; b=Bt+Vzsa6uJ8zHaGswHjM icS/MdRFYe9y1odGBuWApx2g5cfnsC0W7T8qUR31S3lIEyTexIYreucOG2ve4MocM34lzFS25+YtU sVhdPLxdpEQDiDaQIklJekI0J8c1QjDRZuI+cK4rO/+ZOW+vt58z7NmEBDGyvHiNicYqmzJ6rEh44 j5ZL5yprcKW27CactZlDzyHUjn5T+ALj/mT68yoabdNxCW9JxJp2+XGgwk6iynQ2q+eceYwKMOOlM jyClGY0g4jzlfgryQt/cx+w9Iqf4cwt2JlRc5rwPmBKSzjgGV50R3GG462pnEG5SBkzuS5ry6VfMQ DqxjkstKFLOlfg==; From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#76407: [GCD] A better name for the default branch In-Reply-To: <79bad06a6410932dd6c7785256fd589cfaff40f6.camel@HIDDEN> (Liliana Marie Prikler's message of "Tue, 18 Feb 2025 23:14:29 +0100") References: <b900cd17b88123af3ae95f4e7d572e540f86e879.camel@HIDDEN> <79bad06a6410932dd6c7785256fd589cfaff40f6.camel@HIDDEN> Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 15:44:14 +0100 Message-ID: <87jz9g3em9.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> skribis: > + 1. the `branch` field in `.guix-channel`; I just realized: there=E2=80=99s no =E2=80=98branch=E2=80=99 field in =E2= =80=98.guix-channel=E2=80=99. Ludo=E2=80=99.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Feb 2025 14:43:30 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Feb 23 09:43:30 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60073 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tmDCb-0004ir-La for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2025 09:43:30 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47122) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1tmDCV-0004iY-B8 for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2025 09:43:26 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1tmDCO-0006hG-EU; Sun, 23 Feb 2025 09:43:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=uV/SyR0ty4ED3nT1DyIG5fI55I/5vtq/Hr9XFgT7EFg=; b=OvGbD5uK/py2iDMEPgMP KQlgGkbNXyQfzLa4p/HrcjlbXDDww5Q/kbYPHKmuz1QhSqcPGzMBk09LIm+/BvkOl8NKhuYdByoKY AjZBXPUPJFgwM1ZfhAiVgnrnHsvUdi2NDswNxcUXW5NlfGEoQ4x84TDu+zGhexNOcGNZ0sXHZ3Hcx QtuanTT3O9Cu00mFmkLfsFyCAKXpfvsxGalqPKkKaPuJTkEy+1zJciQkEepa6GlLkffAkBzqZ9pux SZR9/aBG6XnCx+HutqrJOcdS8XjUYy59x5eNZUjNpRd42pbuXg4rIIMoQDq48SR0pdDa6K09jHhY2 lPsr00mQisWNRA==; From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#76407: [GCD] A better name for the default branch In-Reply-To: <79bad06a6410932dd6c7785256fd589cfaff40f6.camel@HIDDEN> (Liliana Marie Prikler's message of "Tue, 18 Feb 2025 23:14:29 +0100") References: <b900cd17b88123af3ae95f4e7d572e540f86e879.camel@HIDDEN> <79bad06a6410932dd6c7785256fd589cfaff40f6.camel@HIDDEN> Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 15:42:49 +0100 Message-ID: <87o6ys3eom.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi Liliana, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> skribis: > +For Guix itself, we would decide on a **flag day** 14 days after > +acceptance of this GCD at the earliest, and 30 days at the latest. > +On that day, the main development branch would become "main". > +A commit would reflect that by updating: > + > + 1. the `branch` field in `.guix-channel`; > + 2. the `branch` field of `%default-guix-channel` in `(guix channels)`; > + 3. any other reference to the "master" branch of the Guix repository > + that may appear in the repository (in particular the Manual Updates > + above). Consider this scenario: I have a machine that I upgrade once every two months. By the time the switchover is done, my machine still has =E2=80=98master=E2=80=99 in its =E2=80=98%default-guix-channel=E2=80=99 in = its Guix. Thus, when I run =E2=80=98guix pull=E2=80=99, I=E2=80=99ll end up pulling =E2=80=98master=E2= =80=99, which (the GCD does not clarify this) will either fail because the branch has been removed altogether, or will give me an old snapshot. Thus, I think the GCD should propose to keep updating the =E2=80=98master= =E2=80=99 branch as a mirror of =E2=80=98main=E2=80=99 for, say, a year (a cron job c= an take care of that). Also, instead of changing the =E2=80=98branch=E2=80=99 field, I would sugge= st adopting and finalizing <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/49252> and leaving =E2=80=98bra= nch=E2=80=99 unset so that the server-side default branch is taken. >+## Choice of branch name I=E2=80=99m not convinced this section is necessary. :-) > +The repository update path in this GCD is only valid as long as it is > +simultaneously upheld by other, similar GCDs. Again GCD 002 =E2=80=98Mi= grating > +repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg=E2=80=99 needs to be consi= dered as > +a possibly simultaneous change. I don=E2=80=99t think this has to be simultaneous: both changes bring the potential for breakage if we=E2=80=99re not careful enough, but it=E2=80=99= s probably best to deal with a single class of breakage at a time. Also, perhaps clarify that this GCD is valid whether or not GCD 002 is adopted. Apart from that, it LGTM! Ludo=E2=80=99.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2025 21:01:49 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 21 16:01:49 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37769 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tla9c-0005xW-Gv for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 16:01:48 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-x741.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::741]:53377) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <suhailsingh247@HIDDEN>) id 1tla9X-0005w3-Mx for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 16:01:46 -0500 Received: by mail-qk1-x741.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-7c0bb7328fbso268379785a.2 for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:01:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1740171698; x=1740776498; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Ta9JbKHZYPDTnVqzVaJNWydv6tgi/M3m5qUeDRQxlZE=; b=VF1CCW9QdYhx9w1FWM7HOHPB8TPxMSPd0RRnix1+41PkuZ90jRopASa9YZYbyLsSJV xP1BwWe/KphAPQWmozbpMzDkgP7PEexRSSoE3AkO4RflbcAYWAC6QIy5Wg03n+0D5Eit 9RgTnvXcY3ED4SRydtF5x+0a11do6GCt2xoJWoesCRfPqFglFeDsnO4hNNrHU6v6U3oi BF4j+B/lGDb8og7R9QlF57aSsljXn2hV4X6SnBO8PPesSnYKWKWevOL5crdkvTALMyjR Co394BQr4mlGO2SPUN/rrsRF7jK6wsm7jNN9Y4fDFFamKTNuW6RFdq1FNNOn42aeavMr QaaA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1740171698; x=1740776498; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Ta9JbKHZYPDTnVqzVaJNWydv6tgi/M3m5qUeDRQxlZE=; b=KWHApo+SGIjrjjpsRi0YD05BxteQhhkFK8g/rZ9eA/lLyuNPTuUxBTjI6KDDPvZ43Y +NLp+du8FGTn+B0QSXr4z/BIz55J58cd4PgD6hsZ2YJWZ+opZ4n0MZY8ue7FT1YNMCZ1 RK89+cUI9oA90hLcvygksrK7ADwRMXqWUXzyJbVOEbNaBlmccOKKI2HVsiEeOuaYT2jc ZG2xi849lpBqjxWNATEf0ZxbJ6jyqpPCHs0JKoAoGkv9bhTM5bZ/+NovkL+um5meDfmT wmII1SwAKuxj7WKF8y0RWlNAu1HdGxG/t6VXQIiB2BMwNO8wDJOa/zEuRdRdpaeXPaIF vdMA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUC+jp4z9RgWKGFqq3IKqp+5EkQ1sentoXFuK9qIW4gkDVczzHfaREOzbs+HEjOGY2H43nrKw==@debbugs.gnu.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzVEbjP5+Etp5Y6GPxrrN+ofnahuSukg2geSjtfwiL7NOMhF7ht 464TcFikP/78UH8eoTUWRxpgXloBfmmwWok8x2duh8pH1kWr46tF X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuh2cxa+0ftADffmqq8etVWY4XZ355cZwpeDP805Ro/dy4zS/5iICkN8fe1XjD y4YNhfEWKWeKBzY6xutDWbGXR9fgZLR2zgSPNG+YgV6kflbU2RUmhlY06Kp2rrA6rR+xxhMDfeZ +c6fMprt5Nt3gDLXJC6W2XTH8BrWmmD6lVHPkljNacSmLoIk49fHKarpl6KiyuoGYZ7l6bRreSn f2SxJOoVXCAGm91f8brOPm6eeS1ojh8LDyh7TFPDFuLa9KQrCqPx8EIfdn0a/IMG4EbFoXPgqGH 7fTyKpQsmN3HWAQnwD0m X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGeuDGWxhni680/Rc7LIBd8sHCEw/kZvezmBwf5Yk6crqC+J/Fh3PHqP7Ru0xPYP3cf9/30fg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:6890:b0:7c0:c0f5:29ab with SMTP id af79cd13be357-7c0cef66be0mr844150985a.55.1740171697910; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:01:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from gnus ([70.24.232.14]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id af79cd13be357-7c097e43fb4sm687129585a.107.2025.02.21.13.01.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:01:37 -0800 (PST) From: Suhail Singh <suhailsingh247@HIDDEN> To: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] A better name for the default branch In-Reply-To: <875xl3rwn2.fsf@HIDDEN> (Simon Tournier's message of "Fri, 21 Feb 2025 19:16:33 +0100") References: <b900cd17b88123af3ae95f4e7d572e540f86e879.camel@HIDDEN> <79bad06a6410932dd6c7785256fd589cfaff40f6.camel@HIDDEN> <875xl3rwn2.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 16:01:25 -0500 Message-ID: <87msefrp0a.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: info-guix@HIDDEN, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>, 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> writes: > Therefore, maybe we could imagine that the last commit pushed master > introduce a double pull. I believe I understand what it's trying to achieve (and believe it is worthwhile), but I struggled to understand how this would be technically achieved. Could you please share the technical details of this specific part? -- Suhail
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2025 19:56:07 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 21 14:56:06 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36777 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tlZ81-0004ph-FM for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 14:56:06 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x441.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::441]:49241) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>) id 1tlZ7x-0004o0-UH for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 14:56:03 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-x441.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-38f265c6cb0so1321142f8f.2 for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 11:56:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1740167755; x=1740772555; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Sx6qx0mz4xUr5E4shLYtMwOs6k+uD5QlNOwkvEC5164=; b=hAu1Vd7Tq/BSuyofbHwva0L/1ecW9bO8anZboIRZgDUtBQCaGQQNNHp37sIjHbG8GK t2ffpGQ7QIli7wwswv0cEJ6srUEGlC6JFi3bI3UsSDfSVqlA8yewelsuIsHOA3xsOx2i a7mYQJ/VOUUShhHErSq8MibvW0dXSsd6THd5ytvgmj8BfMakARXef2N878gI3USGf2el 2yYhQ3r19sp3rfEiZGtYH8FN323IsmMtwmKWw531B5iwgD16u0UA80xhUbuVPUnjS4Bw 0og62qX0LtwKKE1e1OEeVUp14Yl3lBaypFtxZpq52/vYujShGjFXaqI+JDlIQd88m3mE cjUQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1740167755; x=1740772555; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Sx6qx0mz4xUr5E4shLYtMwOs6k+uD5QlNOwkvEC5164=; b=PsOZqRRWYG3clu7diAD4L4OwDxUsDnxJPuC6Ma8DkyxSUunefm3rqMROkXpCYOGIDx ZQMc9LjNOSvhnNmzMFqZXCybTmNRFqMeSFra+CTUaj6E1coZtx4Bu1a1R4oOvfbNGrIf M3KcX4VBHXCVNZ7i6YcrCXR108D1yEy7vluPqX8QhvYa1QWyfrfyKE6wUw4QkPgmr1mt Cy1hb8KxCgNuTWN4H9HghOuEp7OH3DGgXVI9qUM5GQBP9Hv6ZycRLPxRAqF/STf4u68y NqhM6I8pWH44oMi6Eh6cM4sgbt7di6VS+YBfENuYqVd8QPZvllVFqeTKcjpEVa1DpN2W CxKg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWxWaLaVOAwXF9SloIDP2f4ggJEqi2j/47sx5pPC5SOSREfKtZ69cGVmerK0EKyZ/87NGUVKA==@debbugs.gnu.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Ywdbj3c1cvoc3/t28mH6rqXUCKPb/FOwcXeOPHdBGXO7z5zdh5p gMG58n1TKH8xXnBhLpmcbSBHFDCssRnVnlOUMGCKu2hxFYHDVYgO X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsayWg0b7M1+uYbvhBLJoP77TW1jubBeaBPCPetCkgu6Y2RQ9houI89flx9zrm dyUqas4+Mn8Q/jgSPnoX38F1/NQpdlDX5XwOU6wM8aanZmCKsTtju6lZO23StGcZvzSQNr2BNLZ YnF2hNkpIDQR/b0W4sISiDs14A62dclieLGKPWDvGzl5XAHvoyiGzSGxSFQlouLPoRfxw714Mlv TxWnDlp0LBWpOJjeIccaigZnCxf1C80wwyH+dqIpVzrYph5+nJocR7lAPsv/oRb5ayFks3ar+vL bMhKaeWSDAYgT+bJ2DkrafWNbfLjBRPS+0VWDMUt9bo3wBHCVQiV9RaxmN9vKL+3KNFQQLSdIU3 Ahg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGpcwQWKx6Z8bjCsfCsuaWepO7cGKXQqclv6bwI3gZYHXFgoBclccUvk0nACvNj1O49c5kHag== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6c6e:0:b0:38d:cdac:fc02 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-38f70772b89mr3252645f8f.4.1740167754724; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 11:55:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from lumine.fritz.box (85-127-114-32.dsl.dynamic.surfer.at. [85.127.114.32]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-38f259f8602sm24877252f8f.94.2025.02.21.11.55.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 21 Feb 2025 11:55:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <b52d4742266f6ace2d9eadf6490ed9a833434244.camel@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] A better name for the default branch From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> To: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>, 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 20:56:29 +0100 In-Reply-To: <875xl3rwn2.fsf@HIDDEN> References: <b900cd17b88123af3ae95f4e7d572e540f86e879.camel@HIDDEN> <79bad06a6410932dd6c7785256fd589cfaff40f6.camel@HIDDEN> <875xl3rwn2.fsf@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.48.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Am Freitag, dem 21.02.2025 um 19:16 +0100 schrieb Simon Tournier: > My current profile is: >=20 > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 $ guix describe > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Generation 8=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0Sep 09 2024 15:14:29=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0(current) > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 guix 056910e > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 reposi= tory URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 commit= : 056910ec864cb7cf3225a0c27679d94405db7dcd >=20 > And many people upgrade guix-daemon less than once a year. :-) >=20 > My point is: I=E2=80=99m not sure that a grace period of 30 days will be > enough considering the time to spread the word.=C2=A0 But, hey we need to > bound somewhere. :-) I put one month there as an optimistic estimate :) We do have to talk about all the numbers used there as to whether they are realistic, whether we should be keeping somethings for longer and whether we can keep them for longer. > Therefore, maybe we could imagine that the last commit pushed master > introduce a double pull. >=20 > Assume I still run this 056910e and we are after the grace period.=C2=A0 = I > run =E2=80=9Cguix pull=E2=80=9D so it fetch the last commit of master.=C2= =A0 Now, when I > run again =E2=80=9Cguix pull=E2=80=9D, I will get the last commit of main= .=C2=A0 This > second pull could be transparent for me. I don't think we should do this for two reasons: First, the "double pull" commit would be introduced to master only, which would break authentication of the main branch pulled this way. Second, we would have to break Guix itself to introduce arbitrary code execution for this particular code =F0=9F=98=89 Perhaps instead, we can on the Git side "redirect" the master branch to main. This would avoid the double pull, and it would be truly transparent. Perhaps the following sequence of commands would achieve just that. (CC'ing Denis for their expertise) Am Mittwoch, dem 19.02.2025 um 02:12 +0100 schrieb Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli: > $ git checkout origin/master -b temporary > $ git push origin HEAD:main > $ ssh root@server > $ cd /path/to/repository.git > $ git symbolic-ref HEAD refs/heads/main # Change the main branch > $ git symbolic-ref refs/heads/master refs/heads/main # Make master > point to main > This might avoid: Oops why don=E2=80=99t I get the last?=C2=A0 Because yo= u=E2=80=99re > after the grace period. :-) >=20 > I don=E2=80=99t know if my suggestion is worth. Fair point. Double-pulling is a source of annoyance in other package managers, so we should do our best not to make it affect too many users. Cheers
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2025 19:24:04 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 21 14:24:04 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36360 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1tlYd1-0000Gh-0X
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 14:24:03 -0500
Received: from mail-wr1-x435.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::435]:50332)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>)
id 1tlYce-0000Bg-In
for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 14:23:46 -0500
Received: by mail-wr1-x435.google.com with SMTP id
ffacd0b85a97d-38a25d4b9d4so1386784f8f.0
for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 11:23:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1740165814; x=1740770614; darn=debbugs.gnu.org;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references
:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
:reply-to; bh=TPizVudaYeVqsb8gGHWeS7r2zwZYAo5a0SL2qGUE38s=;
b=JVWILy3ldkKM9nSEZB6rPMtV0dNBbnPHlst7ubeRQGxHPcW8otqW1dA+ezXP9YgagD
fPn7vuMLBEWw8AHA+/Fr+FsigIDg2xrZarMv2DBEz1J+A6xZg+b8Jq8DBLQFPVe1WOxC
QL+z22OCrd31vVIgibNOBfm8mfzCNGkFDErxWRs9nHi2Fcy9BcUO+oJzQ1EiLFE4P5El
lJdg59OCu45eZ+0Lr3Fwbe353Uuji7PkXeo7lEqRwi/PWh4mZ3tYfeIfNudM+O5e19xo
4x3d47bQ+A8E8/oRWt72j4dAwduKvX/B+Jtr3aHCnzA+7DM7FNiXPUtVaQ+Q6W/j4rBK
8wKQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1740165814; x=1740770614;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references
:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=TPizVudaYeVqsb8gGHWeS7r2zwZYAo5a0SL2qGUE38s=;
b=NyHk5yt0HzuPCslSpF1AbgfXrfWYcP9hSzWqoDddLZRa6xZ7IAsohpEYiXi9OyKB9H
aXIqP4w2Delw8ML9eMbVIMktkEp4Mxl74OoNYZysh2BhXd4UbTc0Q4qOeg7a5DpQMXvP
M1UgvN5jY6wyDZzHEmPUGSm7KYCBaqI1oJDW333WkHwlLTzcl6wo6q5elcbT45NaNUY6
D0CEPNB3SR8mN4FU5P2tx7S1AmS9LtzTIZe9Q3j1tW7oWwawDzOLCntU6XnKfcFO3WLb
BG0Yyr6L3q26axJr/rWxmCYx7EPAOdSNEbUm0igQpkdYDsfmmQ18KBjCru1bAiKUFW3R
IPqA==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1;
AJvYcCWiOl/LmsAYNz/yin2BP1+xhHrB9lwOlnMP3DWYU2H8XK6XbiDJ0xOsVwQaw/T5+fCq4yqU9Q==@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwTXcM550qM7RHIOq+xFIuuF9o5kN52qra6HC3C7709G0cWN2rF
/Ju6xzlXM5fuaw1iI0p6PybgK/Gq1s4oIUuCiZ7XR1Q+OgErJVfc
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvYct7Nv6cMCFoDf+VkLro81zTv3ULtu0F94fAQ2jq7t9AWfrfwkE3UiBovLZJ
T3tbuoY5l9rLVcsIuhqDBwkLl95fFlB4V5C/6QFFutnfJbCRLEEl4FEQp18+HKGrPgdjPmeBtNJ
ZZnorQk06fTEmvVYPIXEKt2VBJZRnQdmMevX5q6Po8FWSwzIU8aIW9j56O7qL7+EN2lK+pdff8n
uSFEjXRsn+oD5k+/fBfax0WRPgsgI/9UkDUKf+6KAfOmJS2dpiykKOpKnY/bLGHzmiClcG+/1pM
GyZlCLX8/NvbkENGuYKpEnZE4fgXR+gs84CsT2bAoDFP/nFWlBOIrPp9KRAhCyQpg+PMOtiQKMD
FHmBncYG4Jq4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IETSY3b2l5r2rlWWX4fVONqNJonP0RijZ0i2kGPFd/4HNPZAUfUbm1lIKovjKsIgqdOKnI7LA==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5f92:0:b0:38d:d99d:d221 with SMTP id
ffacd0b85a97d-38f6e758476mr3603004f8f.1.1740165813916;
Fri, 21 Feb 2025 11:23:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lili (roam-nat-fw-prg-194-254-61-47.net.univ-paris-diderot.fr.
[194.254.61.47]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
5b1f17b1804b1-439b02e6cf4sm25737065e9.19.2025.02.21.11.23.33
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
Fri, 21 Feb 2025 11:23:33 -0800 (PST)
From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>, 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] A better name for the default branch
In-Reply-To: <79bad06a6410932dd6c7785256fd589cfaff40f6.camel@HIDDEN>
References: <b900cd17b88123af3ae95f4e7d572e540f86e879.camel@HIDDEN>
<79bad06a6410932dd6c7785256fd589cfaff40f6.camel@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 19:16:33 +0100
Message-ID: <875xl3rwn2.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407
Cc: info-guix@HIDDEN
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
Hi,
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 at 23:14, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.=
com> wrote:
> +## Repository Update Path
> +
> +For a complete list of repositories associated with the Guix project,
> +see GCD 002 =E2=80=98Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to Code=
berg=E2=80=99.
> +Most repositories can rename their default branch with no issue
> +(see also Cost of Reverting below).
> +
> +For Guix itself, we would decide on a **flag day** 14 days after
> +acceptance of this GCD at the earliest, and 30 days at the latest.
> +On that day, the main development branch would become "main".
> +A commit would reflect that by updating:
> +
> + 1. the `branch` field in `.guix-channel`;
> + 2. the `branch` field of `%default-guix-channel` in `(guix channels)`;
> + 3. any other reference to the "master" branch of the Guix repository
> + that may appear in the repository (in particular the Manual Updates
> + above).
> +
> +Following this commit, an entry in `etc/news.scm` would explain the
> +migration. The `master` branch would then point at the commit of said
> +news entry, and would need to be updated only after said news are
> +translated into another language. The `master` branch may keep following
> +the `main` branch for a grace period of 30 days anyways.
> +
> +Even after the `master` branch no longer syncs up to main, it may be
> +important to still have it pointing at some commit. Old installation
> +media, handcrafted `channels.scm`, external documentation and scripts
> +may all still be referring to the `master` branch even long after the
> +rename (see also Cost of Reverting below). To ensure that these do
> +not fail immediately, the old branch shall not be deleted until
> +
> +1. at least one year has passed since this GCD has been accepted, AND
> +2. enough Guix releases have been made in the meantime, meaning
> + a. at least one major release, OR
> + b. at least three minor releases.
My current profile is:
$ guix describe
Generation 8 Sep 09 2024 15:14:29 (current)
guix 056910e
repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
commit: 056910ec864cb7cf3225a0c27679d94405db7dcd
And many people upgrade guix-daemon less than once a year. :-)
My point is: I=E2=80=99m not sure that a grace period of 30 days will be en=
ough
considering the time to spread the word. But, hey we need to bound
somewhere. :-)
Therefore, maybe we could imagine that the last commit pushed master
introduce a double pull.
Assume I still run this 056910e and we are after the grace period. I
run =E2=80=9Cguix pull=E2=80=9D so it fetch the last commit of master. Now=
, when I run
again =E2=80=9Cguix pull=E2=80=9D, I will get the last commit of main. Thi=
s second pull
could be transparent for me.
In other words, I still run this 056910e and we are after the grace
period, then when running =E2=80=9Cguix pull=E2=80=9D, I automatically get =
the latest
up-to-date commit of main. Obviously, I pay the unavoidable price of a
first pull but under the hood pull.
This might avoid: Oops why don=E2=80=99t I get the last? Because you=E2=80=
=99re after
the grace period. :-)
I don=E2=80=99t know if my suggestion is worth.
Cheers,
simon
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2025 13:35:37 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 21 08:35:37 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57129 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tlTBp-0004dU-0w for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 08:35:37 -0500 Received: from lab.riabenko.com ([185.143.146.30]:46258) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <roman@HIDDEN>) id 1tlTBk-0004cd-K4 for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 08:35:34 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=riabenko.com; s=selector; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:References: In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Subject:To:From:Date:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date :Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=VqaeVbMq+ZsOeyKw6+yK9Q1FdxJ2R9l7QZQviHE5/VU=; b=UOJ+EYewcYL0dyiTV1CMZMxQSI IxuxlgwteTxgFvNoq5y7EOhMGMdSr7KDIqFG1tBpP//4OEerAu54qLRikdVgZP5TSpmhDdTo/pxH7 QtJvHDUvNAh0CS4UjCB/Nnv8h7BmKnTq/thxia/wlEF5p/6a13jWVS/IObT/bB/f6VyHBtTHK4HDe OKVvVfvrsyhnFUutLCSd9VnugYoLx9BpaPysHW4JpGbLHnPJ/l78d3nqh6VxTBXozXi8OpPdONoN6 vvXLaSbkrEdg6RtZ87dFmMDbQ5l5216Ui9mmTX/ccovUziqC/VcfyqukGzA5LloANrcOnjvw5IsF+ QSqkck5w==; Received: from librecmc.lan ([192.168.10.1] helo=localhost) by lab.riabenko.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from <roman@HIDDEN>) id 1tlTBi-000000005hy-3mQP for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:35:30 +0200 Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:35:20 +0200 From: Roman Riabenko <roman@HIDDEN> To: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename the default branch Message-Id: <20250221153520.20b99610afcdf7bea76e9c6e@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <f78d40758e1838026fb3e796f037e917c26f761f.camel@HIDDEN> References: <d835c85c709a393309e6cad4ab065d039f1e08af.camel@HIDDEN> <f072096c292546c760d1342aa7d4f6c950027da9.camel@HIDDEN> <87seocwh1p.fsf@HIDDEN> <87msej45ha.fsf@HIDDEN> <87wmdk8fpd.fsf@wireframe> <c2532d09-e54b-49fe-9ace-dca55239f394@HIDDEN> <d2db73de82bb7bb3a6589a4299287d02dc961c14.camel@HIDDEN> <547c549d-970e-4331-8944-dc7a79698426@HIDDEN> <f78d40758e1838026fb3e796f037e917c26f761f.camel@HIDDEN> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA256"; boundary="Signature=_Fri__21_Feb_2025_15_35_20_+0200_Qy8YQFQicP4dLnnD" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --Signature=_Fri__21_Feb_2025_15_35_20_+0200_Qy8YQFQicP4dLnnD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello. Since guix-help was copied on this proposal, I would try to help too. The word "master" is a metaphor for a subordinate relation. It serves its technical purpose. It became a boilerplate. So, it is easily recognisable by sophisticated audience, which makes it difficult to argue that it is ambiguous for practical purposes. However, being boilerplate, it does not accurately describe the purpose of that git branch in guix. For instance, I am not convinced that other branches being "subordinate" to that branch in some way is its defining characteristic. I would argue that the word "main" is also irrelevant because it describes a relation of importance, which does not seem to be relevant to the development cycle, neither to building a community. So, the proposed change to "main" is suboptimal from my perspective. I would propose the word "release" instead. The word is already widely used in guix to refer to published source code of stable versions of software, so it should be easily recognisable and describe the purpose of the branch accurately. This is the branch where the guix code is realeased and where the guix releases are published. I would note that, as long as a better metaphor can be afforded and considering that the matter has already been considered important enough to bring it up, discussing the background of the proposal does not appear to be productive or relevant for arriving at a solution. Roman --Signature=_Fri__21_Feb_2025_15_35_20_+0200_Qy8YQFQicP4dLnnD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEbyuIUwJNVUrtp3hK60bLvjKDmmkFAme4gRgACgkQ60bLvjKD mml0yg/+JnHq0HYZUmnrVbU1mK95j98U+zxD3n74AGBBDc5fNVUMKg5M1cYpGBrM 1yJXtK0IN3Ee0F7yLy+Aw+hw2vygw77xwG5hMWtpydetWxF8yS5AaUCcutJWs0DJ S5XybjeutX0n2vJqDb9ECCsvZDggZ3PFSKJzCcyLDEPJ8I1v8S451LcMhMnd8H89 Ao0ggFMFAvT7M/ifIISAnP4etcIlh43oAI4NXoqwZJrTlqSV/XABON0AnSnbVUYR J8gY6Mi5UD1lMChIDvRhpMLlTu4pDZfgpnxN2qe9435FFE4szzNTcyCbctSigyGk sILOIu52/yQdxqlTtJ/ZS/G1RsIHwEfeEO+14ogn5RWNw9udFuDXMWB8GKcOT3Ue 5jxih3D+Ewa4M9vVk42wa1buTx+Uika2jtAofy2oKlhTU7dv1ccLNotL0ISCU0eX YOPLV4A5P5T4LXl8xEJ6VJzCSNVtnwMbQBCBBuuCWBXkfVS344FAZzx6QpXo6FEM /ar2cgJTezi9zWDjhd04G1M8SScEJVciCRG1P4LsTQoWUfhZbahM/tTHWEZtx85T Qc8rHLmg4uUgKMCrlgkhfO0HzdxvT8EtAhevZDCxFWzcjchcFOUDrIa9wYDD6yzS vQXtR0+IwK90irmPzVJYS7O1j61yCbFOLokBw7XMUu1foYZIPgw= =3lAh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Fri__21_Feb_2025_15_35_20_+0200_Qy8YQFQicP4dLnnD--
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2025 12:56:15 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 21 07:56:15 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56495 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tlSZh-0003lh-Pj for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 07:56:15 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-x644.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::644]:50182) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>) id 1tlSZe-0003kE-D9 for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 07:56:11 -0500 Received: by mail-ej1-x644.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-abbac134a19so330080266b.0 for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 04:56:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1740142563; x=1740747363; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=lDcSrzNRQC/n61u9xe31f4oBgPpkcpehThasFk+DXWo=; b=d7r1ibq9baSiJ8ZK2CXVjixaP8ogAOtlJCfFrVAIUWCVb7zXsT6e64AjTQl/DAw4ch Id/QXpnbZIRwWB76QZltuMIAnyCjMc2KXYPqCAit4itehdInjYqzELOXqZBvhvNrjnf4 X7ZpccObfGb50fHE+EQqoLffLqOYg/aVeKY8o+u0idp3s8b3BXCM10i/6oveUo8qwp37 xXzIt6ivCqtdpQetjcIXYb5mJbxYaSb4FzVDqLJ0MO2pSd65bU+zAFTvQJXIF6WKsWNK YgFhWF4NfZhzD78+7cUjY7GAjxng5kFFBWrdyI9gDuOiigI8TDJRHQEibgK41F4A48u2 s5nw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1740142563; x=1740747363; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=lDcSrzNRQC/n61u9xe31f4oBgPpkcpehThasFk+DXWo=; b=ghQw0rxGyM6FKwMoLO5bIEfkxhzxtRj/KIyodu2awQ1/bSvsMMHoSzjopjZsOJvysY xdU3duXf8+NJbgHCg8Vn3qnSZ9qz8ehodd1w+0/FZvq4uVZUPnjV9tPwRw9w/g/mrJwr NSN7KwNyjUv1ic6r2/+ECdWkkWXf+9/8Lv2JEHEWCeINgi6itBrFKosuaiVJKvFNV5tS aMH4amxgJYA3huckl2wnr6U/28b1F9eQjuWflfTjfiVK65zvUmzTwOx4p9c+rwtv745N 6D4dwd8s/BgN9iAA0w3XgKU3aZq3QkhQFKy4vHToG/r4koVbR3nEvkjQfwv/RIwBPYBA 622Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxVdW+KWnOF8Mo49sm2XB0I6zWDcD8BFUq0X8ToFdvsSkIJIIho Z3NG6obIIGNkXpMI/Uuq1UNrjPAW3rl6AWXgwlFW2CZMff4S/wUU X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvEQQG0hIH6Jg6pQ6cKrGVoVtwve+7xAGj0UYGh+Ogn18rvxEJPlBncSrO5Uvl cSFeOHKZqrchNUTz9clyfJ9xirtXKMumS9/QO6T1RrkIM5ZY+71vTuNUwWE/OULnelCLrmjmGYF xrsEgk1Nj4S8Dv0oKEFuOGGk/9yCNrEK1CS1mMkkW/suIIImZaFD9Eebg6SkP5rbc3fW9JSGpFK 7XA5yOUI6/aDEUrr+K5U9vpVxvkd7gN//gzHyDKjVsV3WORnlajlqGHplQ+qI7B+/ELl7ZFdDE/ 1JWXuSPUgFFy7zh89Q5Tlh0XjDXjUgicsl0L+RxjMQLzFgG7+Bs9hvdHJsQuehRPWNJzHeDJtqY 1/w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEC+K88K/0ezYKDDca4TVyyXxDUvqkASnpKFQv2JN0ZzFO52c54aRmEcAryG7SRe9QeV4nLSA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:1ca2:b0:abb:eec3:3941 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-abc09c10d29mr301306866b.45.1740142562976; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 04:56:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from lumine.fritz.box (85-127-114-32.dsl.dynamic.surfer.at. [85.127.114.32]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-abb97dea08fsm1013152366b.53.2025.02.21.04.56.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 21 Feb 2025 04:56:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <f78d40758e1838026fb3e796f037e917c26f761f.camel@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename the default branch From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> To: Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN>, Christopher Howard <christopher@HIDDEN> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:56:38 +0100 In-Reply-To: <547c549d-970e-4331-8944-dc7a79698426@HIDDEN> References: <d835c85c709a393309e6cad4ab065d039f1e08af.camel@HIDDEN> <f072096c292546c760d1342aa7d4f6c950027da9.camel@HIDDEN> <87seocwh1p.fsf@HIDDEN> <87msej45ha.fsf@HIDDEN> <87wmdk8fpd.fsf@wireframe> <c2532d09-e54b-49fe-9ace-dca55239f394@HIDDEN> <d2db73de82bb7bb3a6589a4299287d02dc961c14.camel@HIDDEN> <547c549d-970e-4331-8944-dc7a79698426@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.48.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Am Freitag, dem 21.02.2025 um 11:48 +0100 schrieb Ekaitz Zarraga: > > Third, people who feel represented by this change have no > > obligation to tell you that in this level of detail.=C2=A0 In fact, > > given the attitudes of some people replying to this GCD, it would > > be wiser for them not to. >=20 > Saying "I support" is more than enough, but I would really want to > know if they actually exist, because I'd like to make sure we are > doing this for something. Given that I've received four sponsors over the course of a weekend, I'm not really concerned that this benefits no one. > I don't think it's infeasible. It is actually very feasible, you=20 > just need to change the branch name and push. Done. >=20 > The problem is that some people already shared their concern, while I > don't see any justification for the change that has the same weight. So you mean that people have non-technical concerns about the name of the default branch? I won't repeat your arguments, but yes, I understand that you want it to remain at "master". =20 I have listed some issues that this GCD does not address at the end of the document. To my knowledge, these are the points raised so far that it cannot address. If you would like me to add another that is within the scope of the document, do let me know. > I don't see any kind of internationalist approach here, we are just > swallowing whatever garbage an US company throws to us and tells us > is good. >=20 > This proposal is very US-centric, and goes according to their values, > and religion. That's why it became popular there. Even assuming that this is true, how is this any different from swallowing garbage, that some US entity told us 10 years ago is good (i.e. the status quo)? I also don't think there is a clear mapping between "thing happening in the USA/outside the USA" and "thing good/bad". The world is more complex than that, with some nuance to it. In any case, I think that the Guix community can =E2=80=93 using the recent= ly established process for doing so =E2=80=93 reach a consensus on what the na= me of the default branch shall be.=20 > I don't think Linus Torvalds called the branch "master" thinking > about slavery or as a way to shame people,=C2=A0 This is not about Linus' intentions. People can have opinions that differ from those of Linus Torvalds. > I don't think removing the word is really going to change anything.=C2=A0 Acknowledged. > But will do some (maybe little) damage in Guix, as some people > already discussed. What damage will it to, exactly? So far, I think the concerns are - a mild inconvenience to contributors checking out the new default branch - a mild inconvenience to channel authors, requiring them to explicitly state their default branch - an almost user-invisible change possibly causing them to run=20 `guix pull` twice on a particularly old checkout Perhaps, you also consider adoption of this change to result in reputational damage to Guix. If so, why? > If we need to make the life of a couple US-Americans a little bit=20 > uncomfortable in order to keep our software working as intended, so > be it. Do we need though? Or are you simply resisting change for the sake of doing so? Note that this assertion also contradicts the one you made earlier that this change can "easily be pushed and done". =20 > I am uncomfortable every time I need to speak in english here (a=20 > reminder of how the USA imperialism is forced upon me), and here we > are. Wir k=C3=B6nnen auch Deutsch miteinander reden, damit h=C3=A4tte ich kein Problem. > Consider me done here. Okay. Cheers
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2025 10:49:02 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 21 05:49:02 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54605 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tlQab-0000z9-BR for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 05:49:02 -0500 Received: from dane.soverin.net ([185.233.34.11]:58279) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ekaitz@HIDDEN>) id 1tlQaV-0000xA-OA for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 05:48:59 -0500 Received: from smtp.soverin.net (unknown [10.10.4.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dane.soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Yzn1D44lszdGf; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 10:48:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.soverin.net (smtp.soverin.net [10.10.4.99]) by soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Yzn1D0JRKz2k; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 10:48:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.soverin.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=elenq.tech header.i=@elenq.tech header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=soverin1 header.b=LY2QAKC1; dkim-atps=neutral DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=elenq.tech; s=soverin1; t=1740134928; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=Im5Aeqyya5RhZOYqGQwVbboawK2cE131dp0F2xI3Xe0=; b=LY2QAKC1BBqY7RuNwDstWj2p6RA+oGV8A10vQvk5zMjSWINNV8A9sGrz8qrPDJ2tWigIIM xW7yOeS4fXTa4hdMegVo5zWNpIUOdZTCPTNbBO/MXUPy02aEKuNzOYg6FNttz1cydt+NWi 4k81y2QZrnaS/EvfretzGCKd4qGiDqwFH1SLj60ZFnULlHMVMadGSNcZtd1TrCF89XozT6 OB3P6WWucedRqfWxf7p3TM1quskGK89GhcW++w15dNcQ8ENu7bhpOwL+CWIjUtpOwUKWM4 S8Ca1+6FIORRUUPIcxlr5nwlqrEV/okAXDXz2IpGXJCL8ZjUiGjR3OLCq6DtyQ== X-CM-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=d/oPyQjE c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=67b85a10 a=kDRFL8AHNammL21IbMiz0Q==:117 a=kDRFL8AHNammL21IbMiz0Q==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=MKtGQD3n3ToA:10 a=1oJP67jkp3AA:10 a=77VvxhmY0AN8cudxPjIA:9 a=3ZKOabzyN94A:10 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=yPy0HX4kI4LsAlP3oO-2:22 X-CM-Envelope: MS4xfKTLVLuxE5HE357z0U+FvKa9JpAzCTGnXTbX60Ble7WS3xORusuqU8q7Wr5LBVVTA58vovNbj95+ItcrtFkoqikqfN9G+FucaW89wi2dXULTsY0pxQog MIBrzUZ93hgxKt6+5+qXCDePSmux+m783cOp7ugq1a9bbi6KPX/VJP9dogmYHkKtYZimI8hQzI1preogaEzz/zVCIOeoO8k5f48Mm/N19/PF3EpdMb2CmqGj g8aHEe/2wj4hMfR1Giec3A== Message-ID: <547c549d-970e-4331-8944-dc7a79698426@HIDDEN> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 11:48:47 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename the default branch To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>, Christopher Howard <christopher@HIDDEN> References: <d835c85c709a393309e6cad4ab065d039f1e08af.camel@HIDDEN> <f072096c292546c760d1342aa7d4f6c950027da9.camel@HIDDEN> <87seocwh1p.fsf@HIDDEN> <87msej45ha.fsf@HIDDEN> <87wmdk8fpd.fsf@wireframe> <c2532d09-e54b-49fe-9ace-dca55239f394@HIDDEN> <d2db73de82bb7bb3a6589a4299287d02dc961c14.camel@HIDDEN> Content-Language: en-US, es-ES, eu From: Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN> Autocrypt: addr=ekaitz@HIDDEN; keydata= xsFNBGcvh/QBEACePF16wEeQaqfJNgeaSQB6ty6PzLaYtl8UVApPSCF1PYNEhDtxQOOpBXeu k6h68cjhRX7hmug8mAraXotw4aG4Z3kbUro4fzXOYW3rCi/mAm5NFXLUmBX3E1AV1pcD8hDA 5s3LeGzfTo4xRGTW4zTzxGEyrvbChkVib7wTSk52a/WkFas6l3sXnepF8HmIEOWkwQcYdcuo gaNDFP1kjZYvqfKJXmCZnY+lC8Zfe/vlD/x8FZQYBQ5xgXIfbSR0xlRz/XIHfJv6j+3myUUr 2UKMku1dkjlkhNkyfw+RypQzmbJ0oJ4bk76/ju0nnlN65/LvyeTVUh/2O2VnPnZ49keL8sqr APXF4di4pWT+/mPxfoEtiSDtjyzbr8+ajcwLa4SSKLlexqjZj8X6R4tt31Rf/Pliwe4TdPmd 2leE3BIJl9bAuslEvd5tqZ1oa3Zfb62tvpaJCRYMtOEWuGkYdyrwTW7UXJPQpam4X7WoW2jW c5aTpAnpnqIPzaWJmua1lGQjEXgt4xvVdhVmZq32fkTy/rXw9l5a+XU7N4/Zz8AR/0xO+UBc Q1J+wHADjL8Q0v0tZLEaiWL72AsxN3GMWNPXWAplaTPUNPUlNK0JPHwhTX/cQVkIc9avSKc3 BeUofC96d13I7QmRjQ0gcBaLtV9lMOuYwbC+6tb70x2fQsI3bwARAQABzSJFa2FpdHogWmFy cmFnYSA8ZWthaXR6QGVsZW5xLnRlY2g+wsGUBBMBCAA+FiEEXb4j05BTZSZ/jMdq/blSvT9z VtYFAmcvh/QCGwMFCQPCZwAFCwkIBwIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQ/blSvT9zVtbW CRAAkbla35s8RKhQBweqwEcdYDV2Zpt16OgENymjLs/qhh7Y9WgWZ0YraSNYDGCt6lemhior vrXX48+yZC98c8ZgCrr4Hmt8i/6TvJqVhwlZ9//3W/z/YuYDtUPBzRHgwM8tejiXmNqYM8lF Jg64pQaczmGAR29Xf0WTQegSociBSUg9eC7BS74Uh7UbHCgytyretoKmqJAp8SKE/Czt5x4R lXKVgGawzg1GerriwnNbudy0eyl1q0Pn7Q+K+tQ14EPDAM+QsGR/fBV4a3uYP6sBF+SdM+DO LX5MRVbWJ8O3kLmbAKQeLgSLlnYydMY/mTvjgxMAakfGCA4q69gmyDSB0fzAUm3c1JV5VwIo 63rykiOEB/k2m4aiiujH5kOC86sjb273+XXWlOhOEO/vKHHdAh+B7dnEEYUPXnUEMQ23PaF4 22u7C62kw3yH/krKr60t5FxcqNWtCOxEWc0WMZw12Q3Gw8+9oA5DI/f4gjlGvQiQWqj6dvoX vIDmifr0R3sTi6xh+udu2Rp8PsKOW8ZRyQ0/VOiwzBfQkf4PFowaiRp8LnkjLEVft6ruuA1h awO2SKKJ8WpgZPw5oMigZR5DgbunxMD4BcqmD7bSoTRV/ljx1I8UgAaQLPqVVnLt31iENtLv 43kPHl56AbYpAzcvf8nGU3KPhGOoByyuyph4RYDOwU0EZy+H9AEQANc9vw7DnBeNGKhq1Bg5 oiGII7npGXCChe7PB6CJjkvN6n1kXrvBYsaORXvZJPNgmBTKu/ETGYS0t0YeGlI4WTOK9dgB /7T8dngRmrGjPmZjryzfk18tXnJq0zoLixLizDT3FqV4jOG5KjPTxQvpdBMiX9oX4Je2OMqF d14fopLGav0rW7Fh5p83OSREpXbJUJJiUaH3p9U9Ss8IBHzr669PViAqe09EfxL/L0l1JIFj HQjJcg01PUXZAW6aPtd7q6eNCSLTXYPiDRQe2GdRUcB7WfqCogR/LEpzLLcd0NkxCnc0T6da rq2Dupt8rvQ95L4/cOGVcDUDOGE6U92XCkaCvUQkypxQCGKSEjbTFoLRG/4JQj0pAWSaqxPS 7hkTFql4qUAdRwzHN1ib6XedcFfqHSy2Mk5ttW8DaBGKhCm7Mn6+4smXENHSuQxCqHlCQ2m+ 9ogpbxavNVfAblE/ucxyfyo6FlDbGHEG3Yu5296kUPT7PqZLiR3KetMPJfCLY2jVPio3t4tD s7Sj41sG5aIwEApb0Zoz3bPBt5O5GUoPFnXyjO306WLxXrM2tjY38jwHxF1Qvs3HQTJgRei2 g3D3KiiR27cXXs/8lrr8tblr5J1tE4TaQCea5lDuEgTCDLnlcopoYcKpFAUBGQtzcNkudT9w sM2nf9y6INcUE3FlABEBAAHCwXwEGAEIACYWIQRdviPTkFNlJn+Mx2r9uVK9P3NW1gUCZy+H 9AIbDAUJA8JnAAAKCRD9uVK9P3NW1td1D/4xx8AbDKAKx9ezT6GdTZbK6FS66qRQCEzTa5MX ZCEogASOla71CB10l5fFtsRWCtNQLzmgwkFwhdxyjqendDgacc5v/71NBb5KpKni6wDJMeiG s3Lq3ZgWfHte3NZ99iSH+La3aBSFbCloJ/Yf/MJBkzrm1sTTKcgF9/i0pzkume5vtpKRDjjS z4abHu7qk4Sgi5gwWpoKFTT38q6nLP+9SUla3JJjNqU3gvn8kwv6KDMKc4marnSp/c+5O6E+ lNrxMdD0n8+io/Bf/UEI6BU8F7JshPq732bHN1NzUXvgMd4cNsAlvsWM8UCKZ4/usFl1euMM FOvnadZinsTHpXhahJzkYWA7nAKbCoNNq9LPtWxfjHsIfhs+QQafF31Pw+jqHqruB4tH0eiL abrz7kejaZvJdVipNIzRUWYnpP+18khep2UtT1n9VNs6QNb4cHPsoe+s4ga4ZK/klCdEhLya XtbcaNEHb7NZUOBj3HhKFgIY8PD1AptAObHjsUNF5+jfEnl+5WjwyTZTIgDRiOrwn8LWOANQ 0JpR69t06uJwmiogQgnlYe36YFaauHGQZFa+L+R2zgnGn8TnR4C3tH7gNAef9+PKqgmJT5pN IkFzlDmZi05E9xzhj4WQ/OOsqU64eHL2PaDk+2TdfrzNwNFbkABJ+C7BHNAytQ6h9cpUbg== In-Reply-To: <d2db73de82bb7bb3a6589a4299287d02dc961c14.camel@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spampanel-Class: ham X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, On 2025-02-21 09:57, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: > (Moved discussion to bug number) > > Am Donnerstag, dem 20.02.2025 um 23:57 +0100 schrieb Ekaitz Zarraga: >> I don't find this dismissive. At all. I only see a person sharing his >> opinion, which, sadly, I think is pretty hard in this kind of >> subject. > Please educate yourself on right-wing dogwhistles then. I will quote > one for context: > > Am Dienstag, dem 18.02.2025 um 06:50 -0900 schrieb Christopher Howard: >> DEI proponents have a compulsive desire to eradicate from society and >> language anything that has some vague connection to what they find >> displeasing. Telling people to educate themselves could also be offensive and all, but you don't hesitate to do it. Do you actually care about being welcoming? Just food for thought. Listen, I don't give a shit about the political views of Christopher, or whatever you think about them. People has the right to be right-wingers, weather we like it or not. Just that is enough to discard somebody's opinion? Is that diversity? Doesn't "right-with dog-whistle" sound a little bit like "woke". To me, it does. Keep throwing names to the table, while nobody else in the world cares about your left vs right debate. We are making software for people. For all people that wants to use it. Bad news: many of them are right wingers. And some of them are between us. And I believe they are also welcome here, as long as they don't mistreat any other person (the same as the left wingers or the no-wingers). > Am Donnerstag, dem 20.02.2025 um 23:57 +0100 schrieb Ekaitz Zarraga: >> I made questions, and no one has give me an answer that is anything >> more than a feeling of something they don't suffer themselves. >> Nobody, specially not even a single black person, who were supposed >> to be the reason for all this, has ever told me this is something >> they feel represented with this change. > First, this is not just about black people, but any group of people > that feels uncomfortable with the term "master" being used in this > context. Uncomfortable? I am uncomfortable writing in english, as it is my third language. Should we change the language to spanish, my mother tongue? There's a lot of people in the basque community that get angry when a basque talks in spanish, so those are going to be uncomfortable... We should change to Basque! That will make everybody happy. The term "master" being used in this context does not have anything to do with anything that should make anyone uncomfortable. Isn't the word "git" itself way worse in that sense? Guix is a Catalan surname, maybe some of them are uncomfortable by its name, we should change it too! > Second, people can care about matters they are not personally affected > by. It's called having empathy. Well, people can also invent a problem, as I just did. That's not empathy. > Third, people who feel represented by this change have no obligation to > tell you that in this level of detail. In fact, given the attitudes of > some people replying to this GCD, it would be wiser for them not to. Saying "I support" is more than enough, but I would really want to know if they actually exist, because I'd like to make sure we are doing this for something. What do you think it's going to happen if they speak their truth? Are they going to be harassed? By who? The only thing I see here is people saying they don't like the change being mistreated as they were some kind of right wing scum. >> If a change is going to negatively affect the users of the software I >> make I need to justify it properly. >> >> Until this very moment, nobody did. Even if I am actually very >> concerned about human rights, I find the arguments exposed not only >> in this thread but also in the original Git branch naming discussion >> very poor. > I think you are — intentionally or otherwise — overestimating the > negative effects of the proposed change in order to construct a world > where it is infeasible. No, I don't think it's infeasible. It is actually very feasible, you just need to change the branch name and push. Done. The problem is that some people already shared their concern, while I don't see any justification for the change that has the same weight. >> More specifically in Guix, I'm still yet to find a good thing coming >> from this change, and there are many cons already. It's a net >> negative change from a technical perspective. > There is little technical debate to be had about this change being > feasible. Git supports named branches — it always has — and > sufficiently recent versions also support an initial branch that isn't > "master". > > There can be a discussion of what steps would need to be made in Guix > particularly to accommodate this change. This concerns locations in > the code and documentation that assume "master" to be the default name > of a Guix channel, particularly the default Guix channel (i.e. "guix"). > > The issue of what to name the default branch is entirely a > political/organizational one, one in which we cannot avoid showing the > colour of our hearts as we debate. I disagree. Very strongly. It's you, and those who think like you, who is charging this word with some political value it doesn't have. I am NOT in favor of slavery and I am NOT against making everybody's live easier. (and interestingly I'm probably in the same side of the political spectrum as you are). What I discuss here is that I don't think there is any kind of relation with changing this stupid word and making the world a better place. That doesn't show the color of my heart, because I'm just trying to be rational here. We serve the world. Our political views (or how you call them: the color of our heart) are very narrow. I don't see any kind of internationalist approach here, we are just swallowing whatever garbage an US company throws to us and tells us is good. This proposal is very US-centric, and goes according to their values, and religion. That's why it became popular there. Thankfully for many, the world is not the United States of America. In my view there's nothing shameful in words, even in the F word or in the N word. The wrong in is in the intention. The intention you have here Liliana is good. But I don't think Linus Torvalds called the branch "master" thinking about slavery or as a way to shame people, and I don't think removing the word is really going to change anything. But will do some (maybe little) damage in Guix, as some people already discussed. If we need to make the life of a couple US-Americans a little bit uncomfortable in order to keep our software working as intended, so be it. I am uncomfortable every time I need to speak in english here (a reminder of how the USA imperialism is forced upon me), and here we are. --- This debate is draining me, so consider me done here. In the end, you are trying to make this look like those who oppose the change are not welcoming neither empathetic, and that's bullshit. The funny thing of all this is that the times I have felt unwelcome, and I have been gaslighted in this community, and I have seen passive-aggressive answers was coming from you, Liliana, and I have been trying to avoid interacting with you for long because of it. I don't like this change, and I don't like to see that you are trying to make this whole thing look like we are bad people. I am not convinced.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2025 08:57:28 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 21 03:57:28 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52869 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tlOqd-0000s8-9c for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 03:57:28 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x444.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::444]:54737) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>) id 1tlOqa-0000qp-3f for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 03:57:25 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-x444.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-38f1e8efef5so1069385f8f.1 for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:57:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1740128238; x=1740733038; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=/nYWADVxguAzKWhmR7eSS2IUEygWDYA70iIHo0I5Fds=; b=BhkMtjhYejP78WrlvAoeIQtJZCOQqrh9LFECH99ve3dBI8QvKdzeYJWkvMgwXN++6L X16hIrJsI9CPDaQasxhV+WWrYz+YC+j6BFHgC2OuCBY7ignwDUBlwRiudx7xuqxAOQeH XIIACmljuPgvs8HmNcUO++cSALmq0MPfQaGJ9f0F5Q7GhaajKI/9nUfKr08xsAg05AGx GwZfCl17Hmlj9vPUAy35AUdc0HylLkkEupsKFIyTgQmiWMiJqUmX7Zh6oTaZeIiBTrDo 2hmeX8cdxV5/jQQg2R3IjAQgBwbFTYkjFHqjIaYY3jumj4e0ogd5F2/0SwTDVW+AEm2x 5HIg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1740128238; x=1740733038; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=/nYWADVxguAzKWhmR7eSS2IUEygWDYA70iIHo0I5Fds=; b=XlIbqskaYN0e5tZMaRzhvg1As9PS7/3GzjyjZUUBq8IW5pMBnBu4AMqTU/mneZ/E5G /9eXhD/VrcAoKwDGD1Gn1kDefJYmadyOVAPwm5l6lnn79KBfgJsTguoXMkCQIIL1WuJA bZ1O+9vBxs4pEDB/muUfz+kzGjiUQMkVvcMw0yCstBByP42oABKfvdm9jHpT7jt1hgmB PytzRihgZbvjEgm3CjuxpkjoYQPzD2iIj32fOXDTiGZsMyEOi6b6OvLMwhzW2seWo+wi YBxuxDjJUIdYXVjw94UkoTEvJ/CmOdRS4l66NTE8si//zGzYKZUmGLnqYwI2AVvxcFzG Eflg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzdouC45Ct5KqzVdcN5f4iW7IgQ1nwDKLWnApQ/AmyjtcE4d7aX wQ+tDffjQLx/joZTk10uyhViYJ5mt68PEjT7uuucPQdY69Bjo5XOwGcNyXof X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuJ6mpL6z1eUYCCaAgcKWAYPI/+hszgOSuyVNifKz650bqZN8V5PQD0egf1rcs k73IuMgrFDzNgxBHWKHukzMAT79dmAEZAP8jHfUejstgCxRENDyurcGumVsgkTqLTmaxoNpoBlK axt9miZHTXA1kCiaYKlV4QWffEBXYAi8yADFWkEdT1jK5ISFV2pxuSKSh7rafYb0gyq3BHaVrsJ ig7TA5LpDnSRulCEnmon9PlINN6wFrn0GfTzho24HU0VMoOIvTQSOXrQXU5od/iYHrmTjC+Sny2 qBbUzoD0w/JfTEgfH0RtIxfY5zi/m4JQ1AeXfJRh+huw8gRLdHzqCLUIm9L5AIcJO2COnBtV37U ZAw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFu33shvm1H2ec/Ls4NLPQh/bADBBmDirV09Kt6+hnxedmrYL370VeDMtpi/SSGNmdd/SwjUw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:598d:0:b0:38d:d9b3:5916 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-38f6e7564dfmr1712176f8f.1.1740128237380; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:57:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from lumine.fritz.box (85-127-114-32.dsl.dynamic.surfer.at. [85.127.114.32]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-38f258ccd95sm22809386f8f.25.2025.02.21.00.57.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:57:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <d2db73de82bb7bb3a6589a4299287d02dc961c14.camel@HIDDEN> Subject: [bug#76407] [GCD] Rename the default branch From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> To: Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN>, Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@HIDDEN>, Christopher Howard <christopher@HIDDEN> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 09:57:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: <c2532d09-e54b-49fe-9ace-dca55239f394@HIDDEN> References: <d835c85c709a393309e6cad4ab065d039f1e08af.camel@HIDDEN> <f072096c292546c760d1342aa7d4f6c950027da9.camel@HIDDEN> <87seocwh1p.fsf@HIDDEN> <87msej45ha.fsf@HIDDEN> <87wmdk8fpd.fsf@wireframe> <c2532d09-e54b-49fe-9ace-dca55239f394@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.48.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) (Moved discussion to bug number) Am Donnerstag, dem 20.02.2025 um 23:57 +0100 schrieb Ekaitz Zarraga: > I don't find this dismissive. At all. I only see a person sharing his > opinion, which, sadly, I think is pretty hard in this kind of > subject. Please educate yourself on right-wing dogwhistles then. I will quote one for context: Am Dienstag, dem 18.02.2025 um 06:50 -0900 schrieb Christopher Howard: > DEI proponents have a compulsive desire to eradicate from society and > language anything that has some vague connection to what they find > displeasing. Am Donnerstag, dem 20.02.2025 um 23:57 +0100 schrieb Ekaitz Zarraga: > I made questions, and no one has give me an answer that is anything > more than a feeling of something they don't suffer themselves. > Nobody, specially not even a single black person, who were supposed > to be the reason for all this, has ever told me this is something > they feel represented with this change. First, this is not just about black people, but any group of people that feels uncomfortable with the term "master" being used in this context. Second, people can care about matters they are not personally affected by. It's called having empathy. Third, people who feel represented by this change have no obligation to tell you that in this level of detail. In fact, given the attitudes of some people replying to this GCD, it would be wiser for them not to. > If a change is going to negatively affect the users of the software I > make I need to justify it properly. >=20 > Until this very moment, nobody did. Even if I am actually very > concerned about human rights, I find the arguments exposed not only > in this thread but also in the original Git branch naming discussion > very poor. I think you are =E2=80=94 intentionally or otherwise =E2=80=94 overestimati= ng the negative effects of the proposed change in order to construct a world where it is infeasible. > [T]hose who oppose them have to justify them to death,=20 > while being respectful, but also carefully not to sound like Nazis to > them. Well, they could at least be courteous about it and not scream "DEI" and "woke" at a proposed change they do not like or something. =E2=80=BE\_(=E3=83=84)_/=E2=80=BE > More specifically in Guix, I'm still yet to find a good thing coming=20 > from this change, and there are many cons already. It's a net > negative change from a technical perspective. There is little technical debate to be had about this change being feasible. Git supports named branches =E2=80=94 it always has =E2=80=94 an= d sufficiently recent versions also support an initial branch that isn't "master". There can be a discussion of what steps would need to be made in Guix particularly to accommodate this change. This concerns locations in the code and documentation that assume "master" to be the default name of a Guix channel, particularly the default Guix channel (i.e. "guix"). The issue of what to name the default branch is entirely a political/organizational one, one in which we cannot avoid showing the colour of our hearts as we debate. Am Donnerstag, dem 20.02.2025 um 14:44 -0900 schrieb Christopher Howard: > Also, I think that the word "main" is just as bigoted and non- > inclusive as "master". I mean, what can be more demeaning than saying > that one branch is the "main" one and in some sense more important > than the others? Perhaps one branch being the "master record", the only trusted, authentic source, whereas all others =E2=80=94 particularly those that had changes applied to them =E2=80=94 are untrusted and/or inauthentic by distinction. In practice, the main branch requires certain guarantees that other branches do not: team branches can (and arguably should) routinely be rebased on the main branch. If the main branch were to be rebased, however, all users would receive an error upon pull. Cheers
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2025 06:58:44 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 21 01:58:43 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51042 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tlMzi-0004vL-St for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:58:43 -0500 Received: from tobias.gr ([2a02:c205:2020:6054::1]:51268) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <me@HIDDEN>) id 1tlMze-0004uI-NC for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:58:40 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=2018; bh=eAJhxoq+9Y8gm kjYG4SRd2fuK8mYjY8ViRCFqQgn0bk=; h=subject:to:from:date; d=tobias.gr; b=EcGTafQ4eUDD19RxHYhL9e2FDPG68DZZNnWUuO6JAFohs33/rc5dI62Z17rinKtD7sh5 IA+dbCt4wBp4bpOeSuomhxcAJQk8YED5QHs+1nkY/2VBRI5rmOwKKzCQg3qIf1y01TiblQ 9mLz2WMHyZqOKqmSlFYyGoeE6ytquMnpc2Pk8sxmVcws+XsjSy+V5Extd7In9f3mb89bxT TkRiJZT1LqjvTStIEUb4NMjr6C+kdB1XypKPwWGv7OENLgRGGPK2f0zWsYll6b+Izy7F3J NQ3H7MuTPI1zp9q/9VzevXN5/XjlHzwLCCw1dWVp4WdUfbbpWc/3d7HZ0T/Z6bNg== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 00f39a3b (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 06:58:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 06:58:10 +0000 From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN> To: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: [GCD] A better name for the default branch Message-ID: <CA3E79B7-498C-44E6-BD90-85E8531AABF5@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Autocrypt: addr=me@HIDDEN; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFVks2ABEACjGBPhWf/qx0L9OhEIrAFTimo5dHa1FLy0AHaHvxmwYSIdJmERYGiNle1rcOvw cFRtu8KJUsrs27Vgoso3qHJpghVitUUf0v3ZuXQT9kfuQLz1Y8pyMzHwVFMLiJVj4Z3y7CJk+xyZ cpSAMbyPINbFVEhsK+z+8ojVGuaiucZkib6b67ySG6Pp1bon8xVvosj71ZRjfXh1t4X8laWO7fQq itT9lmc6DxbE/4vIhR+Vb2MblaA+DyHoNHGGao89h4CO99lfzWzsux41DnEG9d317sJRQTig6Wja EKHXZRA9FbfogD4SDa2uQYCpTJpsVjAyZyu2fuJ+t0zJJ+Ai9qDY87P6hOyd+/n8Eh2Y4TbxJiDo XUT72XY/RfPH1qrMIP3EI/NNL4LQeGG1n+625k3OVWcRVXG2vRrB6qurLmGkLEmjXWCFD9cCRGfH LeajLm9sM+t/nZPZ3btetcmK9tM2EwivyLUNhrTk73UUnI4CSAzdO2cISqo9zSMtFgj2alqd2fOR s7CKfEn+5PquruDbp/Ej7dOOrjgWSCXLDDYXRrtaKrLz/dhqq5ftFYi9tUTTQecFotM08fPtu+Kw JMP2ySHCkUqp0GvrUCeSRPAJZsmJrd535y+LlRhnqb0mbG4dgMa8A6xhkFYugnqldy/q7kX1EmRI 686N7bA6fh1MCQARAQABtCRUb2JpYXMgR2VlcmluY2t4LVJpY2UgPG1lQHRvYmlhcy5ncj6JAlIE EwEKADwCHgECF4ACGQECGwMWIQT1vFU0w28Ah7OdNu8cncT+udt8SwUCXpe0rAYLCQgHCgQFFQoJ CAsFFgMCAQAACgkQHJ3E/rnbfEu5IhAAk+0BW/twLmx1xMmeXn+I7Ne6SG3++0TRBduEaGWV3n59 lX6XPZUQdAPpS4uy0H+c90Owkw+aWUEwfyOWphrxZRtR2cCOP/3Pxj3Vgtz5RkY4u27lMj15jqa/ p7l2l256ZKJOegr9TvOWtkhMp5lxeVHT6f/44Kv/r/8mMCgSnLXYrEWPE462xI+mIJOanHLJb6No f2xLRCvXoLLp7Yejjv1dwOO71R9PMRhtNy46pZM1ylQ++UTkeSocJw4aNtiu0DHOkX9AlNBkutIx x07RpO+MqJKlzzLeQiC/fE5+dR2itRONopwXAqN3MuT7MonQo5XifBn+VK8i9xZWTXZDkWItWtCC 8oIj4zwxwFWiTmMwwSbI3Wdd/11Zw3CLc4Gd0M6NVgvAnuErQXSgr4lrWhZcncvi4L6EJTc9AUSa 8UWPF+S9t+CHTukpJmcYnsccMkOBhT7OZlmWBsylrYK/JTRWqgWSHWdSKmOuLK+MGDneOZEHkEcf jeXRWvmG7MSU5tE/p7NDLIg9vkvhQV9b0q4OtY65uNWbRe2QRJaYMDcYUAeSZzivRa8VaoVen6tb FvH44zpCxubn23ABl9YIzwvJC++r+H2qLdLpy0cfITiZadZ74Ae0aosNw7XARS6OY+A03BfXyPiI 2oW0jf/PdH9sh2mQrQxIQJ5cZz6Z3X20MFRvYmlhcyBHZWVyaW5ja3gtUmljZSAodG9iaWFzLmdy KSA8bWVAdG9iaWFzLmdyPokCNgQwAQoAIBYhBPW8VTTDbwCHs5027xydxP6523xLBQJZUuJkAh0g AAoJEBydxP6523xLwEoP/iaVWdICefmaZ+bkdUg6hwTKxSPlYdLoaCxYI5V2NnZYXG0dy47E7WJP 4EmTDldcne4UG5NyCgXPSMZDNMqcddEMNbmlssTcLKyu6R/VvTcuL3pEhNoLzm9t2IHR/YGAHJIc pyfmJ3amGSlsbo6s6Vv+mbrJTRPIDpLUst/PDoGYihcSKTxoIw8RtNAy+FAliIdJ8ZuPA3BTxQei sQzgWJo68UInvnFp4juq0zupNDqKddemI8kZCRK/fFPBDD71nqiSJjx2tvbjkTiPU9gmTp7Nulgj ZATZIt0pUhn87w15ItzrsiEjTYCMTmHY5wnvyLarFKZLzQjgUJfsbv4WRJRnX0/EEJWMvMtSdtXL fjwTLrSGAr4vh13PMfE6uVkGkeCV/8BfGJqRE4zkI+QOVILw6VSAP6sdtGSGb52bcCuPj7p9zGIB IuKFudT+DzUb5uV2jbahSjJ8X4Ak/ruG2Hv3iICZawDpHV1JDNgY910KNi5T6gFrjFA2G6aiXDCO SlToLPnPBYH85UVOsp2VykE9AREKS7a7o76cibjwBNN+4xJqJRxhs9YH4JKzE3w/ptVnx49QFBGc pjPkzMTs7DtanD8iqL4J6afnycv9KqIlNJONaMHvzxeunV7QCsoF6DdusZJKFMexiDBaOFUmGFFS XfzK2oNjknx1QApyTPvhiQJpBBMBCgBTAhsvAh4BAheAAhkBBAsJCAcFFQoJCAsFFgMCAQASGGhr cDovL3BncC5taXQuZWR1FiEE9bxVNMNvAIeznTbvHJ3E/rnbfEsFAllS4TwFCRa6MNwACgkQHJ3E /rnbfEuMFg//csSmcerqM+h1jwlKPJ4UiLXj3kFxSuSr0DrJzgLIpjuMdB2bhJ3YZwJTrZI9P7DP v+ebTKoeCjxoi5zJcINakZ9/FBn3cOCsYmpdHdaOPm34pHh9c0y9+NAvGJvugBRWIWK3qYYJzjff YL1r5lGCM4FXuhTcjVTTs5iCvYlAhtnHEAM6+c+mftdwrCJaqCiz3G13OCtpujn8fOn/B2nv6ZdT hen3Xqh3xBU2PnxPhVtyOulsJ318SKbUAk0h3tbLLkzFIS+7XvpHuwB72NkZw233IAN1Uq/nmJK/ YIsi+icNGpI60+PnLFiqYrSmtD6BCf8pOPq+isscu5uTuhfHt8fjLZPiqyf12CLoNKIp94sUi/1n M75GKz9MPWs6vqosq+E1xs9wVBw0gwUluejWgg3mIE3754W6xQ6tnpspdrt+x5kykfPMD3r1T8uq +z4ZUtE3A6QIjjxzIN0Xk8ZpC5Mg3yUzhyM1qF4e8pM2U7/tJC9BO5CNWJmKBqmGZ5sYw85wjEZ+ WnfU770tgCGZjcjIYjqYuoCgHMd2J8pkXdf76CINWK4+fCoKHr/4kWfU3e8ikFStTBer/Bu5tXa5 RPh90F6l2DNRitUdv+7vAiFnAuP61ZSUSqRbOiE1SPTv4cGBOCgB7xIOU6+rKzlweR/vO0otLZc+ TyFnSKPrfzg= X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) There's a (broken) thread discussing this proposal on guix-devel@: <https://lists=2Egnu=2Eorg/archive/html/guix-devel/2025-02/msg00278=2Ehtml= > <https://lists=2Egnu=2Eorg/archive/html/guix-devel/2025-02/msg00357=2Ehtml= > I hope it continues here instead=2E Kind regards, T G-R Sent on the go=2E Excuse or enjoy my brevity=2E
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2025 18:23:19 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 20 13:23:19 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40544 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tlBCg-00036A-TJ for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2025 13:23:19 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x343.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::343]:58628) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>) id 1tlBCe-000357-F7 for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2025 13:23:17 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-x343.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-439a2780b44so8406215e9.1 for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 20 Feb 2025 10:23:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1740075790; x=1740680590; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=PwCSjQv2UXo3RtEsjuAO5CdJeZB/803kLxCKdOiFGxk=; b=HeBeYNc9P6LgAHVD4S7f/kvmNARqC6K1+SJD5u5qIlt7kJrQZGYJH39U5F2A7myHFA y+mhOjeYKY/BIHnH4RRXFlDXkfstULO+5y53bXS5Jx3nScyaFsgZLUwNO68yQNKY3chV zCCCHafMAt8pUNRWYosIuXpD7f6p+hD0osQZ+bIcRRlgyCz18Mw86buuuphDRaEuQsIU hR2RqPeXOvvB4fEdk7OjK5IrLMDpSv0yy69ZKOGOHxsg6y6Uk1njRF5I94I0LgnDB0lF O3Xk5UQWh7M5wUZGKvYVFCD1IeNKw/mdSDM4CRItOC85dGs8Gup7fj1gMnFdNZCs3MCk uC3A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1740075790; x=1740680590; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=PwCSjQv2UXo3RtEsjuAO5CdJeZB/803kLxCKdOiFGxk=; b=fFlltwbhLv+LE+QQil4VLbCZ0IervPBafSEU5KECz9+cdVUaJI8sVWJ5EtvxSwg1jq iCcnre4vxkvQDpCQwnWghyWoDuV3jq3pjxGy2aQVWzzFoft79ZdsMKR5FO3gl03ibBkN 2RC1dTchKPYLKkz8grduxOfgrOi6TdhmIOMSzE+y489OjHUlkkvt6VdBIihhTrS3j2ks beOx26PtFy9jNYgly9g/c9sBbj4+p/k4yQnazD7M7Xu1iteqWnVzWxl6GJidvd6PqZe6 DqBI7LN2B7UDnnYow6HdyOhnyxMSBO4YTnbmHsMXjjs+CzdswgsRK90f1tUu94OeBeDb nJXQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCW0IUT35sA++FKxQDOUA72EDtj7rbiRan6+qVyGl9uDBrdaDeR9R94bpvroaS8P232h2yT0KQ==@debbugs.gnu.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwzKyedYJ7DP0cAjvtYVtcfrRJw6CR7iaqOc5gAiKZmqaVZEmp7 9pFqWP6nZ1zJk2MDf0L89png5Z5xglC8/zY6ly1juhmXQhbHoiSZ X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncteDixU1AnDjK3ItwyjAMjd8bPtKj3TThbZD4E0Biw0md7JZG96nUGx+HSYfdt 7jyVEX4ybgipca0GItKIOI/3tAy4XkiJp8r0Qs8p+iAusn3+u/owBuJ9OFmX4PDXWk/l5RrKZWc e+yTTyTWethv32nU+JynzQVVhK9MNj+8F6tBTwdwArDoiF0q8g3lj12TBl+C/chDziUpsa2frfE e8MSnFcvg03/8eMQL2vBaQD4GUi1QYnuCIF9KLDyX4vt21cCOP3lU37pBY2+HMB9TlK64Y/I/2T m6XTJ4c8yUtahKvoZZ7j6w+TBqp12ornj55bRtm0Y4yc9pwYBEr1yAtuxCI7kcXjEzc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGVri62zOsNUbUiRrepLPJGTR7C4Bthmvwi2XyismaksChHzrf0Cm1mydhYykbG2wiUsABkLw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4f49:b0:439:967b:46f4 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-439ae21d178mr2223935e9.26.1740075789781; Thu, 20 Feb 2025 10:23:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from lumine.fritz.box (85-127-114-32.dsl.dynamic.surfer.at. [85.127.114.32]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-38f258b4344sm21583708f8f.13.2025.02.20.10.23.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 20 Feb 2025 10:23:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <035d5bb2e0fe23419879b1566789d82eb604d887.camel@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] A better name for the default branch From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> To: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>, 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:23:47 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87frk8lea9.fsf@HIDDEN> References: <b900cd17b88123af3ae95f4e7d572e540f86e879.camel@HIDDEN> <79bad06a6410932dd6c7785256fd589cfaff40f6.camel@HIDDEN> <87frk8lea9.fsf@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.48.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: info-guix@HIDDEN X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Am Donnerstag, dem 20.02.2025 um 18:25 +0100 schrieb Simon Tournier: > Hi Liliana, >=20 > A minor comment is to title: =E2=80=9CRename the default branch name=E2= =80=9C or > =E2=80=9CRename from master to main=E2=80=9D.=C2=A0 And not use word as = =E2=80=9Cbetter=E2=80=9D. Okay. > Now, it=E2=80=99s submitted, I recommend to push this revision to a dedic= ated > branch, say =E2=80=99wip-default-branch-name=E2=80=99 directly to the GCD= s > repository. > [=E2=80=A6] > Feel free to just fetch and push if it appears to you fine. I fetched and updated; preserving history. > > +SPDX-License-Identifier: CC-BY-SA-4.0 OR GFDL-1.3-no-invariants- > > only >=20 > The recommendation is GFDL-1.3-no-invariants-or-later; see [1,2].=C2=A0 > And I think it would be better, no?=C2=A0 Maybe you have something > specific in mind? Nah, I just copied one of the outdated templates D: Cheers
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2025 17:25:58 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 20 12:25:58 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39727 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1tlAJB-0003cZ-Ki
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2025 12:25:58 -0500
Received: from mail-wr1-x433.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::433]:53618)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>)
id 1tlAIw-0003Z1-CL
for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2025 12:25:43 -0500
Received: by mail-wr1-x433.google.com with SMTP id
ffacd0b85a97d-38f22fe889aso1034620f8f.3
for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 20 Feb 2025 09:25:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1740072336; x=1740677136; darn=debbugs.gnu.org;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references
:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
:reply-to; bh=hF4A5zwLt1zQc9ZFVgbsWxrIRcctmyLhA5lWl+urZis=;
b=Vcq/9GKSkxxhNui5kDZWx5Honzh82k7XfY3+s4uisM64Upyppv9MyGDaUNkqsVJpha
mf7z04hQxMfMUystKp1npg2+vGwDRyg//llpIxd90wr0xZWQzvjnwHfdTcnHMk6Y0j9x
qGoq+YQUWs9EItsFyUuOphSWaDxS14CPy3RKHGsaJ+m+kxsOvkp7f5zbu7ua1P8BL+IH
e6x1+JyJGBhFnNGKtiuHjC90bupGUlFVJKEQtBqXtI7WtHnyVgV6CXDoYl0tCIZqegq2
hOsZGX8B+X6Ux55X90nKmA/1XhVlu3pySIW8zL6KfMRBG2AGr7pDdIUp6Txtr6eAcdb4
ESiQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1740072336; x=1740677136;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references
:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=hF4A5zwLt1zQc9ZFVgbsWxrIRcctmyLhA5lWl+urZis=;
b=t58Ugx/CJOui8Sf6kow3Z3xkOWY2rm4jKdxUFUQPweangruDM4h7nCXhyt56l/ApU7
huDb03iHBam/NJYegn+ON8WbOHNsgAch7ivLb5jNnC3q7n+xddOpy7BMGW48niC+kjP0
jfmQAcIfXPYHJ48eQmh2jZpJv7eMiv6CWx0hKTjDXUm1rdEPJWecoKQkMJouWjCsHd3e
REyPqkthSC78kYo7oj9lhmakgsBCwitP9+6o9xFMjUZLKBkMB4U+IINqeXOD4w28lhvb
3aN+7OLDE6V/PoC7W6vF99ZOewSSi6fOqE/02POBAFXEybLU4gy1AUFvMAd9172zfQG7
DUJQ==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1;
AJvYcCUD+JkNIs7x7kebQDCn1FM0w5+Z69SNvZfkl/hkw7Jw41A+1/o7KyGXkrnlaEWoqPrAWhccbg==@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxeIlFTv8ePewUj+cihyHWtX+vbVZYzj0yMSt8TH6UTnE2cqj5g
KWQgWUx2Vy6BIPaDss0tns3AQhikAx2Iq2IHET3Uc3HOSuWl+nIz
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncve9Hk9h3xqZjK6gWTFf/7tF9LcN282Q3QrkA7dtFtPqF5ZvviEBvtgkDVDSvM
n5SsWvBSHlGtJ8cPmz0rbclA9ImiIZ57zRcl5VyFPcJ5FJNU6/BAzDYs9RZV6LFTkDjx9iwwdNy
NSa3njXhAGsBFNQDSvnE4ZqtOwj6fdCIew/kOQDg7m85VXS44iP9JBr9PmsIVozwYCSwnGbyC42
0j2QNAOPx9fxzSVRSKJD06NJUJPOhhJTUS90UaW8UtKgilVNyIAoBeCNtpuI5k9iUK8i0Qhv2vU
mmEt5xMXJCoqlNQeyksANOHXCm85JJ9BHCrLSlCdgMtIhp5i/RZofMdo0d0unu4r9MyIaUDn5ph
H
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHGb78o0iMWL/DBystpJSd6VBLQCK+uoixt3mwPGsQuABTnqawHzNSlLKn7EPHA7Q/ct1xL4w==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:584b:0:b0:38d:d299:7097 with SMTP id
ffacd0b85a97d-38f6e7567b4mr116020f8f.5.1740072336125;
Thu, 20 Feb 2025 09:25:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lili (roam-nat-fw-prg-194-254-61-42.net.univ-paris-diderot.fr.
[194.254.61.42]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
ffacd0b85a97d-38f258b44b2sm20923097f8f.20.2025.02.20.09.25.35
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
Thu, 20 Feb 2025 09:25:35 -0800 (PST)
From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>, 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] A better name for the default branch
In-Reply-To: <79bad06a6410932dd6c7785256fd589cfaff40f6.camel@HIDDEN>
References: <b900cd17b88123af3ae95f4e7d572e540f86e879.camel@HIDDEN>
<79bad06a6410932dd6c7785256fd589cfaff40f6.camel@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:25:02 +0100
Message-ID: <87frk8lea9.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407
Cc: info-guix@HIDDEN
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
Hi Liliana,
A minor comment is to title: =E2=80=9CRename the default branch name=E2=80=
=9C or =E2=80=9CRename
from master to main=E2=80=9D. And not use word as =E2=80=9Cbetter=E2=80=9D.
The rest is logistical stuff, FWIW.
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 at 23:14, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.=
com> wrote:
> +status: submitted
> +discussion: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/76407
> +authors: Liliana Marie Prikler
> +sponsors: Simon Tournier, Ian Eure, Vagrant Cascadian, Ludovic Court=C3=
=A8s
> +date: 2025-02-18
Now, it=E2=80=99s submitted, I recommend to push this revision to a dedicat=
ed
branch, say =E2=80=99wip-default-branch-name=E2=80=99 directly to the GCDs =
repository.
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/guix-consensus-documents.git
Well, I did but instead of pushing to it, I only pushed to my personal
copy of the repository:
https://codeberg.org/zimoun/guix-consensus-documents/commits/branch/wip=
-default-branch-name
Feel free to just fetch and push if it appears to you fine.
Why? Based on the experience of 001, it can quickly become a mess. :-)
There is several revisions in different emails and all becomes harder
and harder to follow. Do I read the last revision? This one? And no
there is this yet another email? And that MUA screwed up the subject=E2=80=
=A6
etc. Hard to follow; especially for the ones who just want to read the
last current revision.
Moreover, it=E2=80=99s more comfortable to read a plain file than a diff, I=
MHO.
For example, one revision of 001:
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/guix-consensus-documents.git/tre=
e/0001-rfc-process.md?id=3D7da54b980efcd23ce662040b00712bd7fa76982e
(It perfectly works with Emacs browser EWW so it works for any browser. ;-))
Last, having all the revisions in a dedicated branch allows to easily
diff between each revision.
My 2 cents. :-)
> +SPDX-License-Identifier: CC-BY-SA-4.0 OR GFDL-1.3-no-invariants-only
The recommendation is GFDL-1.3-no-invariants-or-later; see [1,2]. And I
think it would be better, no? Maybe you have something specific in
mind?
1: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/guix-consensus-documents.git/tree=
/000-template.md?id=3Dc6a594ceb316e23bea975928eb2f40b7df450c94#n8
2: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/guix-consensus-documents.git/tree=
/001-gcd-process.md?id=3Dc6a594ceb316e23bea975928eb2f40b7df450c94#n8
Cheers,
simon
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2025 19:01:15 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 19 14:01:15 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51718 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tkpJq-0000Sd-O9 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2025 14:01:15 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x443.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::443]:60517) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>) id 1tkpJn-0000Re-VO for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2025 14:01:13 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-x443.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-38f3486062eso111935f8f.0 for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2025 11:01:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1739991666; x=1740596466; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=3xHLF6020mciw/A/bWYf0S3EnF+A9yTbBQgHXYEe/sw=; b=lG6S3vZj6Al9my0tOuL2eokoMjB+2KkEDugkAUwZuyU2ysTToOky2kb9z+OuHLT4MH h6LXlY7k1vZmoPwlJbF6PqBf79Hv+NsgU8I9HTbW2x6XXjlDyCK03RXenXBMKdPY6N4j zM7/1JOWmWb1xlk7xBNHo3Hk8OtKxWbUUh+8fR8HkyXIs+ACIqb6X2gaAhpUhbGc0nrT LbMEYSVseZLGEs1xFTbPYtwj+xT+n8EeqSddsUhJ9keAJ6yWgX7dYmoN16LUR6xdC8LQ ka08hkA7pbsRgHsPKczK507rRbKMdXTt/Kbi8M41GBDfkZglSU0V8slvDdrCex9bpbrG tVTA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1739991666; x=1740596466; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=3xHLF6020mciw/A/bWYf0S3EnF+A9yTbBQgHXYEe/sw=; b=NDiyfeFt6WxmoureAbZ5cO9Yp7tckJjMoXh5fcDY6IqRuE0M97OeT51wAvIEGHvgj1 T5yEwb03hQ5S2w6BQxaBYVtrcDNaEQ4MUhesVPBY8lWJZId90Qwy3ncMgORL2aCbgLP4 dpy7fAK8SPwst76i/GGx3OpTF609AfVK4MsfHbo9/vSaUat/mvVpUX/+6h6eIoBx4eRp 7V3mS3r6fTQOj820/BENzsa7JXcMmWs9BIYxV4PjM0LlBzZVZuB+arqTNBe2MTPtjTG1 QH1M5ASOtLIC7F/08uiFdDcyFCLBM6Iy8AA+hXVzAYO3RPaEQPDVjAdSt1X96ZE23Rpk J8Ug== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWxSq+s+P7VYE72x2tOfnJMksUAux449lgC9YKft3zPSaXNz4qKqG9ujfOE77n5LiCKG4q2mw==@debbugs.gnu.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxP0lnEn5TuOkLpbAEOSUARswQHhLyHrbN5dKSfAcVSCbdQ94kG KaHSHcgvUKKbYfHRQ8GCTj4CCcQzWkVhnU4cIftd0vVHcXwGSmuVhr8gm4FY X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvq1piIYnM4jXVFAsmswdJRvDbBhn3pYiXMWGCfYxsrqmZoiOAyx7ektkZEspF 7WHed+e4EguDqrxNr3bOv8UJUY9Ckgf++GdpbjGIptB8K+ixBDUb5olvVWujicZZwjwuHB4Fy6v CELwSYyfnJMX6yUQGVieZeS/m+qXFp2WJuRu4PB7n2vRq0CHovQ+yDJ6Ag2jWg9WAucC+KRD7mI yBoptQ9x3GgvfbhTtF7I2UuQrXtNzrSFrF3kDMVcH1w3K+xbUWkaS46+PV2clTwm5wlfNjDMzEy wFth4s4ifaj9mxcrRFXVioo53zhoXQC/Xl0vJpRdmg5Og+0xIlwk2VXkv44km4RkK8U= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF01sX7qJwodcd9sK/cAI19OoClCLGgpdVqJ1Lt1561ehF2gqwCHr/vLti+TtDceb64VXeL9g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1f88:b0:38f:3d10:6ab7 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-38f58793c87mr4299756f8f.23.1739991665401; Wed, 19 Feb 2025 11:01:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from lumine.fritz.box (85-127-114-32.dsl.dynamic.surfer.at. [85.127.114.32]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-38f25a0fa1esm18385732f8f.100.2025.02.19.11.01.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 19 Feb 2025 11:01:04 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <64c4631029ff07927e3a1cb181be2ea05df8a03a.camel@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] A better name for the default branch From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> To: Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN>, 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 20:01:45 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87wmdlhmu4.fsf@HIDDEN> References: <b900cd17b88123af3ae95f4e7d572e540f86e879.camel@HIDDEN> <79bad06a6410932dd6c7785256fd589cfaff40f6.camel@HIDDEN> <87wmdlhmu4.fsf@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.48.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, Am Mittwoch, dem 19.02.2025 um 17:21 +0000 schrieb Christopher Baines: > > +=C2=A0 1. the `branch` field in `.guix-channel`; >=20 > This doesn't exist as far as I'm aware? >=20 > That record does have a url field, which is important as it means > that Guix can highlight when there is a mismatch between the URL > being used and the contents of the channel. >=20 > I think it's worth considering what a similar mechanism might look > like for branch names. Maybe Guix could have a notion of whether it's > using the "primary" branch for a channel (if you pull or time-machine > to a specific --branch, this is ignored), and that record could > contain the name of the primary branch, and then Guix could highlight > when the two differ. Nice catch. I did copy the wording from the Codeberg GCD, which talks about updating URL. If `branch` is not considered by .guix-channel, that's one field less to update. > That mechanism would allow for clearer messaging to users, since they > could see it again and again, rather than a news entry which would > usually only be shown once. >=20 > > (define-record-type* <channel> channel make-channel > > =C2=A0 channel? > > =C2=A0 (name=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 channel-name) > > =C2=A0 (url=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 channel-url) > > =C2=A0 (branch=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 channel-branch (default "master")) > > =C2=A0 (commit=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 channel-commit (default #f)) > > =C2=A0 (introduction channel-introduction (default #f)) > > =C2=A0 (location=C2=A0 channel-location > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0 (default (current-source-location)) (innate))) >=20 > Is changing or removing the channel-branch default in the scope of > this GCD? I think channel-branch should reflect the new default. > I'm in two minds about this. It's just the default, so it's trivial > to change it for the default channel. But ignoring it doesn't seem > consistent with the rest of the proposal. >=20 > Additionally, if the guix channel changes, then this might encourage > people managing other channels to make similar changes, and I think > there might be different and potentially more serious technical > issues with managing that change. I think it would be sensible to > ensure there's a good path for channels in general to change branch > naming before making the switch for the Guix channel. Perhaps we could warn channel authors in advance that the default branch is subject to change and ask them to set "branch" explicitly. > > +Following this commit, an entry in `etc/news.scm` would explain > > the > > +migration.=C2=A0 The `master` branch would then point at the commit of > > said > > +news entry, and would need to be updated only after said news are > > +translated into another language. >=20 > In this scenario, assuming you're suggesting only pushing the news > entry related commits to "master", I think the branches diverging > would be problematic. The point here is that we don't have to keep master updated indefinitely, but it should point towards a commit that is also on main. Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli has another idea using symbolic references. > Assuming you're using the default channel configuration, if you pull > to one of these commits on "master", which isn't on the new master > branch, then I think the next time you go to pull, you'd hit the > downgrade protections (or at least you should do), since this is > exactly the kind of downgrade attack that it's trying to prevent > against. You'd be pulling a commit which isn't a descendant of the > commit you're currently on. See above. > ... >=20 > I also haven't even started to think about what implications this > would have for the services I'm involved with maintaining. The data > service instances and the bordeaux build coordinator all have current > and historic references to the "master" branch. In particular, the > data service goes beyond branches being pointers to commits and > records the state of branches over time. >=20 > It isn't immediately obvious to me how the data service could be > adapted to handle branches changing name to both capture that a > branch may have never actually pointed at a commit, but that commit > is in the history of the branch in the Git sense. I think with the > current behaviour, we'd have the history of the "master" branch > (unless that's deleted), and then separately the history for the new > master (not "master") branch, but that would start when that branch > was cteated, and the two histories would be separate from the view of > the data service, and this representation seems rather lacking. Good point, we should add a section talking about the Guix Data Service. Cheers
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2025 17:21:48 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 19 12:21:47 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50593 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tknla-0005vL-FG for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2025 12:21:47 -0500 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([2a01:7e00:e000:2f8:fd4d:b5c7:13fb:3d27]:41871) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <mail@HIDDEN>) id 1tknlY-0005ux-1w for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2025 12:21:45 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a02:6b67:e390:8b00::2000]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E808127BBE2; Wed, 19 Feb 2025 17:21:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fang (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id eaedf0d3; Wed, 19 Feb 2025 17:21:41 +0000 (UTC) From: Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN> To: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: [bug#76407] [GCD] A better name for the default branch In-Reply-To: <79bad06a6410932dd6c7785256fd589cfaff40f6.camel@HIDDEN> (Liliana Marie Prikler's message of "Tue, 18 Feb 2025 23:14:29 +0100") References: <b900cd17b88123af3ae95f4e7d572e540f86e879.camel@HIDDEN> <79bad06a6410932dd6c7785256fd589cfaff40f6.camel@HIDDEN> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 17:21:39 +0000 Message-ID: <87wmdlhmu4.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 Cc: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> writes: > +## Manual Updates > + > +Sections 19 (Security Updates) and 22 (Contributing) of the Guix manual > +would need to be reworded to reflect the new default branch. Other > +sections mentioning =E2=80=9Cmaster=E2=80=9D branches may be reworded at= any time > +regardless of this GCD. Some mentions of the word =E2=80=9Cmaster=E2=80= =9D are tied to > +particular services and thus subject to rewording only once upstream > +adopts a different terminology. > + > +## Repository Update Path > + > +For a complete list of repositories associated with the Guix project, > +see GCD 002 =E2=80=98Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to Code= berg=E2=80=99. > +Most repositories can rename their default branch with no issue > +(see also Cost of Reverting below). > + > +For Guix itself, we would decide on a **flag day** 14 days after > +acceptance of this GCD at the earliest, and 30 days at the latest. > +On that day, the main development branch would become "main". > +A commit would reflect that by updating: > + > + 1. the `branch` field in `.guix-channel`; > + 2. the `branch` field of `%default-guix-channel` in `(guix channels)`; > + 3. any other reference to the "master" branch of the Guix repository > + that may appear in the repository (in particular the Manual Updates > + above). > + > +Following this commit, an entry in `etc/news.scm` would explain the > +migration. The `master` branch would then point at the commit of said > +news entry, and would need to be updated only after said news are > +translated into another language. The `master` branch may keep following > +the `main` branch for a grace period of 30 days anyways. > + > +Even after the `master` branch no longer syncs up to main, it may be > +important to still have it pointing at some commit. Old installation > +media, handcrafted `channels.scm`, external documentation and scripts > +may all still be referring to the `master` branch even long after the > +rename (see also Cost of Reverting below). To ensure that these do > +not fail immediately, the old branch shall not be deleted until > + > +1. at least one year has passed since this GCD has been accepted, AND > +2. enough Guix releases have been made in the meantime, meaning > + a. at least one major release, OR > + b. at least three minor releases. Thanks for writing this GCD up, I have other comments and thoughts, and while I'm not against changing the branch name in principle my main objection is this, I'm not sure we're technically ready (or at least in a good state) to change the branch name for the default Guix channel. > + 1. the `branch` field in `.guix-channel`; This doesn't exist as far as I'm aware? That record does have a url field, which is important as it means that Guix can highlight when there is a mismatch between the URL being used and the contents of the channel. I think it's worth considering what a similar mechanism might look like for branch names. Maybe Guix could have a notion of whether it's using the "primary" branch for a channel (if you pull or time-machine to a specific --branch, this is ignored), and that record could contain the name of the primary branch, and then Guix could highlight when the two differ. That mechanism would allow for clearer messaging to users, since they could see it again and again, rather than a news entry which would usually only be shown once. > (define-record-type* <channel> channel make-channel > channel? > (name channel-name) > (url channel-url) > (branch channel-branch (default "master")) > (commit channel-commit (default #f)) > (introduction channel-introduction (default #f)) > (location channel-location > (default (current-source-location)) (innate))) Is changing or removing the channel-branch default in the scope of this GCD? I'm in two minds about this. It's just the default, so it's trivial to change it for the default channel. But ignoring it doesn't seem consistent with the rest of the proposal. Additionally, if the guix channel changes, then this might encourage people managing other channels to make similar changes, and I think there might be different and potentially more serious technical issues with managing that change. I think it would be sensible to ensure there's a good path for channels in general to change branch naming before making the switch for the Guix channel. > +Following this commit, an entry in `etc/news.scm` would explain the > +migration. The `master` branch would then point at the commit of said > +news entry, and would need to be updated only after said news are > +translated into another language. In this scenario, assuming you're suggesting only pushing the news entry related commits to "master", I think the branches diverging would be problematic. Assuming you're using the default channel configuration, if you pull to one of these commits on "master", which isn't on the new master branch, then I think the next time you go to pull, you'd hit the downgrade protections (or at least you should do), since this is exactly the kind of downgrade attack that it's trying to prevent against. You'd be pulling a commit which isn't a descendant of the commit you're currently on. ... I also haven't even started to think about what implications this would have for the services I'm involved with maintaining. The data service instances and the bordeaux build coordinator all have current and historic references to the "master" branch. In particular, the data service goes beyond branches being pointers to commits and records the state of branches over time. It isn't immediately obvious to me how the data service could be adapted to handle branches changing name to both capture that a branch may have never actually pointed at a commit, but that commit is in the history of the branch in the Git sense. I think with the current behaviour, we'd have the history of the "master" branch (unless that's deleted), and then separately the history for the new master (not "master") branch, but that would start when that branch was cteated, and the two histories would be separate from the view of the data service, and this representation seems rather lacking. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKlBAEBCgCPFiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAme2EyNfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcRHG1haWxAY2Jh aW5lcy5uZXQACgkQXiijOwuE9XeeyQ/+M8Yj3zAXG3uAmOD3aC0nwPXWi3bVZXTD Sa1bHj6uXil1RpHKndDiMLFjxzb6pjmeJzTkDfKaXdFRlRtbxOYtFNF7hBT+ocCH TyInCDFmFlkX8vQa3kJIAzBqWwAYERQccQBvOA7J85u6/k69DClu8TKiilimaxfY hd0Xqv2tpv+LK755OSX17vZ7PY9kwGtCZGyyyzwfQ4XXuZpb0daCgg1fZ9CbKz7L bsokjYTGLp1r+3kH0OHspEpRJdfEhFXAkUlnPrQEcaUlJYNQzI9/zXX7DpV9hOd1 uT5Pzkv27qOIU3J2xxBK4e9uaCfqg6rMPGmE10kIf3i41HftydnDH6yx+oywVUzt lVVUu0tBYsgO7MkRQONnwyfwEp925EJIZ3pYQWuibo6B68wWPD7qASBuHPLDt/U6 C4hDvwNTgRFXm3mpSGm4bTVF/91QXcpyYX8pR2Z3u8Pm8kDYVdZielHrlSzIxl3o 0SfEoWSlcQtvvmE0VxepLe9GSC1a1BjcmXtV6FDkZo5Cizv7w08O86D7CGKSQ3vO IRRAOfnsH8Ax/gRdhyq1ivgrM7NhVfj1z/c6yxLl/ufpUTigRDp7sBeFusjzCfjN vqGjlAeZUPk3nWDaQDnbWlloxrwNn7yNI/6ERxhW1Bf3Wec78KjfRglLjmAuEQie CHYZtBNH/X0= =RZOY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 76407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Feb 2025 22:23:35 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 18 17:23:35 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35278 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tkW06-0007bN-FI for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2025 17:23:35 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x441.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::441]:51488) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>) id 1tkW02-0007ab-TD for 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2025 17:23:32 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-x441.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-388cae9eb9fso3129468f8f.3 for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2025 14:23:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1739917405; x=1740522205; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:message-id:to:subject:date:from:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ZaeYlgY2s5TuLkWCzuY9MFac7MrS2eaafx227e8ABsY=; b=CAEM4kV2NxKbxFTi53yo4vgPLTsd5nA0d/VplpAe4qAoHmTyrSPh+DNdcmeoNHH8Wp bjxVSZ4C9OpsJaC9RanOTWrhv6MZzRP+qwfL4VrjfjxjeAc6t5gCQh8UtchZypkjj1vn uZsE9jeNTKAur3ShbzVnEhToPPwyafURq/oY3bPUpa2sGSWIOCvz8Em0xtmwiqKS2F0L 90GxN0AJuBGm699u5l3aHqjhybfjIJJjxg7GcztOWdUA4FXYD5+ClAiZ2Rw85wq+6jG7 vncI5TutIMUOZfuwzhvbvYEusSWp/YHxfikBgDLjXicWPycBBZ6lX6YLdpBN1YlH9pJD HloQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1739917405; x=1740522205; h=mime-version:message-id:to:subject:date:from:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ZaeYlgY2s5TuLkWCzuY9MFac7MrS2eaafx227e8ABsY=; b=DqU7vTA06/tPGwJbs9eY/RXTr+yNokzyth8j08no8sVhMAqI/MUObdkEqecsfdZN4x 15+I34GYDINhpplQefR9MpzKrGSaT2gIDTQly5pmPhPX4F+2SYXlHTW4a9aWfU8ulhV1 ZwC//20tPL9dKj6cKyXtAxgs65IP/xtc4z9nTTTF9j69+U5coTVIWTTCKlH7jnsFXk00 TjpQb3m8yitOcsHiqK6y3hmjulgdxWhhI1BQWcEI39HrWtPrxbZ8TAVtvOdHVm8um/lf Ngeyf7dpC166IoFIfg9kh/k7gpRrGeorjhvDuWvlNhxEnn3UYUb1M+fY8ndEwuW/Kg8O HdsA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxSSxzWv4uVXEapIuivkJJUB/mSUDInFdZSDGj/1ciJd4969YgU b93nLNxq13hPbN/b7ekeOGAr/2jkdfRiC8/+Zw/FEplQAP+OR6HFlseY2uYq X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncs+JJzAsX222TYk6puxv5ie10p7h1FkDE98Jt5/P4BFnE92x4SSUU+5O+mEwo7 AIRw8J0zGMzNRTHT6Vezlut9+x0MRGVrRop1E6sOUuriJj8xWzqYEh7DQFVmIEHcQU50/XSzZhc Udzi9ydNYs722Fgf/80+VRcDGyiexFMZyMWFZLUyTThgzoF39MGdpg0y9OVyVk3e/jdglbbCLro OLCVWcUExZzKK3avungORcTWRuB31SINKJAE9U9iykk9bB2U9D6WAGJGO/TE2CPUZuGw39HlGrH YoXS28VmORSj/sK1/sQtOAwcBs1bg7VOWsIEJZlDIB2XPeOUjS2YfRg13VYCMOofeyE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGL0wh4DWKHDgJWXwK4FJFzdmvHpu0TNgrLN2sOLiiF4N2pbHvzpLqSWhzXAUyFZhi8uqEgHg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:64ed:0:b0:38f:2a84:7542 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-38f33f5234emr13424869f8f.28.1739917404376; Tue, 18 Feb 2025 14:23:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from lumine.fritz.box (85-127-114-32.dsl.dynamic.surfer.at. [85.127.114.32]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-38f258b4491sm15813347f8f.7.2025.02.18.14.23.22 for <76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 18 Feb 2025 14:23:23 -0800 (PST) From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> X-Debbugs-CC: info-guix@HIDDEN Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 23:14:29 +0100 Subject: [GCD] A better name for the default branch to: 76407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Message-ID: <79bad06a6410932dd6c7785256fd589cfaff40f6.camel@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76407 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Hi Guix, this patch introduces GCD 003 “A better name for the default branch”. I've taken the comments on guix-devel into account (most of them anyway) and updated the document accordingly. Note that references to GCD 002 are made. That GCD was drafted earlier, but may or may not already be submitted by the time you read this. Do be patient :) Cheers --- 003-better-default-branch-name.md | 187 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 187 insertions(+) create mode 100644 003-better-default-branch-name.md diff --git a/003-better-default-branch-name.md b/003-better-default-branch-name.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..95952a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/003-better-default-branch-name.md @@ -0,0 +1,187 @@ +title: A better name for the default branch +id: 003 +status: submitted +discussion: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/76407 +authors: Liliana Marie Prikler +sponsors: Simon Tournier, Ian Eure, Vagrant Cascadian, Ludovic Courtès +date: 2025-02-18 +SPDX-License-Identifier: CC-BY-SA-4.0 OR GFDL-1.3-no-invariants-only +--- + +# Summary + +Currently, much of Guix's development takes place on the “master” +branch. This name is neither particularly meaningful nor inclusive; +choosing to use it may inadvertently alienate potential contributors. +To mitigate these effects, we should more clearly communicate, what the +default branch is all about. + +# Motivation + +It is well known, that Git works with whatever branch name one chooses. +However, for historical reasons, the default/initial/main branch for +development used to be “master” — particularly in 2012, when the first +commit to Guix was made. + +Recent versions of Git support arbitrary initial branches and the +default branch name is subject to change upstream, at least in part +because the current default — “master” — may be perceived as harmful. +While the intended meaning is something close to “an original, from +which copies are made”, there are several other meanings of the word +that spring to mind more easily, some of have a racist or sexist +connotation. + +One goal of the Guix community is to foster a healthy community around +the software we use. Using clear language that does not pertain to +harmful stereotypes is a key towards achieving this goal. Thus, as a +proactive step, we should rename the default branch. + +# Detailed Design + +This section explains the chosen solution among the available options, +the scope of the proposed migration, and a migration path. + +## Scope of this document + +This document discusses only to change the name of the default branch, +not to change the branching strategy. Such ideas, e.g. to have a +“stable” branch containing only bug-fixes and well-tested features +and an “unstable” or “experimental” branch would need to be discussed +in a separate document. + +## Choice of branch name + +In this section, we discuss potential branch names that have been +considered. The goal is to find a name that Guix contributors, as a +whole, feel comfortable with. + +While this GCD is still being reviewed, new suggestions may be added, +and benefits and drawbacks for each name discussed. Once this GCD is +accepted, these benefits and drawbacks shall be shortly summarized, +and a final decision with a short justification as the one at the end +of this section shall be the last paragraph of this section. + +- The currently used “master” has more than ten different meanings, + some of them pertaining to slavery, others to dominance, and yet + others merely to skill and expertise. It is understandable that some + contributors would feel uncomfortable with this name, given that not + all uses are equally frequent. + +- The currently proposed alternative “main” has several meanings + relating to “importance”, the most obvious being “most important”. + +- Other alternatives would be “trunk” as a visual metaphor from + which “branches” spawn, and “base” with the same meaning. + +- “guix” being the name of the project also serves as an option, + albeit one that is not clearly defined (are the other branches + not guix as well?) + +- Similar to “guix”, “development” merely signifies that some sort + of development happens on the branch; a fact that should hold for + most, if not all branches. + +We choose “main” simply because it is currently the explicit initial +branch for a git checkout as per `git-fetch` in `(guix build git)`. +Another name could be chosen by any means that support achieving a +consensus, e.g. comments on this GCD or a popular vote. + +## Manual Updates + +Sections 19 (Security Updates) and 22 (Contributing) of the Guix manual +would need to be reworded to reflect the new default branch. Other +sections mentioning “master” branches may be reworded at any time +regardless of this GCD. Some mentions of the word “master” are tied to +particular services and thus subject to rewording only once upstream +adopts a different terminology. + +## Repository Update Path + +For a complete list of repositories associated with the Guix project, +see GCD 002 ‘Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg’. +Most repositories can rename their default branch with no issue +(see also Cost of Reverting below). + +For Guix itself, we would decide on a **flag day** 14 days after +acceptance of this GCD at the earliest, and 30 days at the latest. +On that day, the main development branch would become "main". +A commit would reflect that by updating: + + 1. the `branch` field in `.guix-channel`; + 2. the `branch` field of `%default-guix-channel` in `(guix channels)`; + 3. any other reference to the "master" branch of the Guix repository + that may appear in the repository (in particular the Manual Updates + above). + +Following this commit, an entry in `etc/news.scm` would explain the +migration. The `master` branch would then point at the commit of said +news entry, and would need to be updated only after said news are +translated into another language. The `master` branch may keep following +the `main` branch for a grace period of 30 days anyways. + +Even after the `master` branch no longer syncs up to main, it may be +important to still have it pointing at some commit. Old installation +media, handcrafted `channels.scm`, external documentation and scripts +may all still be referring to the `master` branch even long after the +rename (see also Cost of Reverting below). To ensure that these do +not fail immediately, the old branch shall not be deleted until + +1. at least one year has passed since this GCD has been accepted, AND +2. enough Guix releases have been made in the meantime, meaning + a. at least one major release, OR + b. at least three minor releases. + +## Continuous Integration + +The jobset for the `master` branch would be removed and a jobset for the +`main` branch with the highest priority and the same set of architectures +would be created. + +## Relation to other Guix Consensus Documents + +Since this change has the potential to affect users and contributors in +ways that will disrupt their workflow for some amount of time as they +reconfigure their local checkouts to point at the new branch, it should +best be adopted as the same time as other, similar changes. In particular, +an adoption at the same time as GCD 002 ‘Migrating repositories, issues, +and patches to Codeberg’ is desirable. + +The repository update path in this GCD is only valid as long as it is +simultaneously upheld by other, similar GCDs. Again GCD 002 ‘Migrating +repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg’ needs to be considered as +a possibly simultaneous change. For the sake of clarity, the promises +made in the repository update path w.r.t. the availability of the old +branch shall not exceed those of any other accepted GCD and instead +be updated to match. + +## Cost of Reverting + +This change mostly affects contributors, who would have to run the following +command once to pull from (and in the case of committers push to) the new +main branch: + + $ git branch --set-upstream-to <origin>/main + +Users of the `guix` CLI would be advised to run `guix pull` again to fetch +the latest commit from the main branch. Users of old installation media +(e.g. disk images for version 1.4.0) would continue to use the "master" branch +and the default channel URL of said installation media until they run +`guix pull`. A new release may mitigate this annoyance somewhat. + +The main branch may be renamed to any other name (including "master") by +repeating the steps laid out in the Repository Update Path and +Continuous Integration above, using <name> instead of "main". + +# Drawbacks and Open Issues + +There is an ongoing political debate as to whether the name “master”, +standing alone, should be considered harmful. Similar debates may +well surround other names given enough time and particular +circumstances. More generally, as language continues to evolve, +meanings that appear obvious today may no longer remain so in the +future. + +It is unclear, what effect, if any, the name of the default branch has +to contributor satisfaction. The choice of a name may well appear +similar to choosing the colour of a bikeshed. What constitutes a +meaningful branch name will inevitably be a matter of opinion. -- 2.48.1
info-guix@HIDDEN, guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Feb 2025 22:06:44 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 18 17:06:44 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35110 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tkVjo-0005xe-6I for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2025 17:06:44 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:34376) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>) id 1tkVji-0005wT-DC for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2025 17:06:41 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>) id 1tkVjc-0007Z5-27 for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Tue, 18 Feb 2025 17:06:32 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x341.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::341]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>) id 1tkVja-0008R5-C1 for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Tue, 18 Feb 2025 17:06:31 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-x341.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-439846bc7eeso17448945e9.3 for <guix-patches@HIDDEN>; Tue, 18 Feb 2025 14:06:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1739916387; x=1740521187; darn=gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:date:to:from :subject:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=HZDeEm/qd1Py6p/YEaKBDfUcG7uYADc7ke7gQpkk2w4=; b=hCxy0cPBvw3vAcDP5qVaeNXU/fq+I8gC+uEHLnRbaD/FMqBgqsUIViyGW0UZgw67yP LTrvtOfmkpDc53I8QCANRQf7xbae/35uUIrxGmJ0550piQ6XcLgIVE/GUPn4qKwzu5pe Sl1p1ILkhaFr6c0PbCb02kWaDnamxzqjK7ntVu/wSew+tD2njL5LDp7W5dmLWBPCZ9AV EhUIxtzAy4CkulJXGT4EZlKlnW3seTcY/kH1Yzh23WLPU6w7UMEO4rqmXIxcNun1TKcW J7bUFKWIAdoJIDCRfRJcIYWOUc3s3xwMjSlx7bp3x6FAEzKjaxD/iviuwhMYwWCKPCSk QTFQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1739916387; x=1740521187; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:date:to:from :subject:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=HZDeEm/qd1Py6p/YEaKBDfUcG7uYADc7ke7gQpkk2w4=; b=kce0msfJP2r6+sYYC20z1TjeM+of1/3/AIc1B4M0fLF6Z1oiiv9tQzKQ3NXr0t1ITv yqHvv3SeNTFG89sjOVG7hP3RYex+dvMNRHaOSX0vOnnXoyiSfUsG88Eh9n/DYEt3fXlC 0p/AqPtLCd4NfpKkxPJQhvGKhw72673sBek+nUWdsDKKUXcCT6ShjcBdo7i6KlLfZ2dj qoulZbi5m5YojZ6E+/kbEu8CKQzcFDMayeZ0O0SNmWBq9TC+iA5rJezXuMeTwCV+ILLi usL7ShM95Va3817NDh/lpFY4d+KyZI4LkelQJkNbjcPCXOy0UtWutWOVEaxnQ9QCk0QZ KUzQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxR908Y5iXvJw/1Jdpn4i+jIQHoud5fCvylsKgEBbwoJ384Zl9d XHdfFGUQMB4vCSLvO/5GHKlbJKgXfA6B9av4H48T6To7sfRh5m+e0BOQyNNm X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncs/kAzLaERnnNY4/ENGIi0ZYPy/3h23lSPlkosk/EZaPV/RxcJEAuq/LdxnToJ h+9wclDPi+KvtxL5zWgPe6MS/3dYiJQUbNt1GGGIN/tsppOi5ia6lHqIPRnmWlLMOIwmIV+zYyH ri99s04gXKjVYj+asmyOEnFoUKPHedSLD0zqUrro4H1jEw0B9zX8TthmuMpe3+FFjW20EZHDMVI xqObuXeKeQSL/BIocJ7N98s+1oeNNrxNrFFTO3jAAuMSXGi8wYfpmcavrk05oa3Pt9tTNb8Txrw z7nYf1w3OwuJ/IXEnOpdkL0jSerXnSEVKDmDfONkivWR+iONRxxijpQU8IN3wVEzwyM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEnDpa1RvmHoLQjVWcE0cuz2nnFQDQLaZRnmTJRHi1PPLRGqVnZm9By/3qKqh/yu5LNAfNZPQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:354c:b0:439:9951:1220 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-43999da7d5emr11410355e9.13.1739916386527; Tue, 18 Feb 2025 14:06:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from lumine.fritz.box (85-127-114-32.dsl.dynamic.surfer.at. [85.127.114.32]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-38f259f7998sm15854314f8f.82.2025.02.18.14.06.25 for <guix-patches@HIDDEN> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 18 Feb 2025 14:06:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <b900cd17b88123af3ae95f4e7d572e540f86e879.camel@HIDDEN> Subject: [GCD] A better name for the default branch From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> To: guix-patches@HIDDEN Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 23:07:07 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.48.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::341; envelope-from=liliana.prikler@HIDDEN; helo=mail-wm1-x341.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Girls do their best now and are preparing. Please watch warmly until it is ready.
Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>:guix-patches@HIDDEN.
Full text available.guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#76407; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.