GNU logs - #76655, boring messages

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#76655: 30.1; MH-E: "unseen" folder broken on OpenBSD
Resent-From: Mike Kupfer <kupfer@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2025 00:58:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.76655.B.174079063430295 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 76655 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Mike Kupfer <kupfer@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <36294.1740790601.1@HIDDEN>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 16:56:41 -0800
Message-ID: <36295.1740790601@HIDDEN>
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=198.144.192.42; envelope-from=kupfer@HIDDEN;
 helo=shell1.rawbw.com
X-Spam_score_int: -18
X-Spam_score: -1.9
X-Spam_bar: -
X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9,
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001,
 SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)

A user running 30.1 reported that when he runs mh-index-new-messages,
the resulting index folder (+mhe-index/sequence/unseen) does not list
the source folder(s) for the found messages.  The folder should look
something like

  +readLater/linux
    4  02/28 [Van Snyder     ]  Re: Hardware question
    6  02/28   [Greg Wooledge  ]  Re: Hardware question
    8 %02/28 [Salvatore Bonac]  [SECURITY] [DSA 5872-1] xorg-server securi=
ty upda
  =

  +readLater/misc
   22+t02/28 [Substack       ]  In-app video publishing, Notes stats, and =
a new t
   23 %02/28 [Palo Alto Farme]  Shop the Market, Support Our Community

But this user is missing the "+readLater/linux" and "+readLater/misc"
lines.

Furthermore, if the user views or deletes the message in the index
folder, a corresponding action is supposed to be performed on the
message in the source folder.  That's not happening.

Normally, messages in an MH-E index folder should have an
"X-MHE-Checksum" header line.  The user reports that those headers are
missing from the emails in the index folder.  MH-E uses this header to
tie the entry in the index folder to the entry in the source folder, so
their absence explains the above two problems.

The relevant code in MH-E is rather twisty, but it looks like the
headers are missing due to a bug in mh-index-sequenced-messages.  MH-E
calls out to an external program to compute the MD5 checksum for a
message.  mh-index-sequenced-messages sets
mh-search-next-result-function to mh-mairix-next-result, which
works if the external program is md5sum, which is what Linux users
usually get.

But the user reports that mh-checksum-cmd is set to invoke openssl,
and it looks like MH-E is unable to parse the openssl output.

The reason for using an external program are historical.  (These
problems are not a regression in Emacs 30.  The user also saw them with
Emacs 29.)  MH-E should get rid of the current framework
(mh-checksum-cmd, mh-checksum-parser, mh-checksum-choose, etc.) and just
use Emacs's md5 function.

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Mike Kupfer <kupfer@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#76655: Acknowledgement (30.1; MH-E: "unseen" folder broken on
 OpenBSD)
Message-ID: <handler.76655.B.174079063430295.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <36295.1740790601@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 76655
X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs
Reply-To: 76655 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2025 00:58:03 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 76655 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
76655: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D76655
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#76655: more investigation needed
References: <36295.1740790601@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <36295.1740790601@HIDDEN>
Resent-From: Mike Kupfer <kupfer@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2025 02:00:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.76655.B76655.174079435625975 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 76655 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Mike Kupfer <kupfer@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <44995.1740794346.1@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 17:59:06 -0800
Message-ID: <44996.1740794346@HIDDEN>
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

I looked at the code some more and ran an additional test.  I now think
that the thing that I noticed about mh-search-next-result-function is
unrelated to the checksum problem.  If I force Emacs on my Linux system
to use openssl, I still get the proper results in the index folder, and
I see a checksum header in a test email.

So there's something else peculiar about OpenBSD that I need to track
down.  I'll try standing up an OpenBSD VM to reproduce the problem.

It would still be nice to replace the calls to an external program with
the Emacs md5 function.

mike

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#76655: 30.1; MH-E: "unseen" folder broken on OpenBSD
Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2025 09:00:03 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.76655.B76655.174081958328515 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Mike Kupfer <kupfer@HIDDEN>, Bill Wohler <wohler@HIDDEN>
Cc: 76655 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2025 10:59:19 +0200
Message-Id: <86senxqg7s.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <36295.1740790601@HIDDEN> (message from Mike
 Kupfer on Fri, 28 Feb 2025 16:56:41 -0800)
References: <36295.1740790601@HIDDEN>
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

> From: Mike Kupfer <kupfer@HIDDEN>
> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 16:56:41 -0800
> 
> A user running 30.1 reported that when he runs mh-index-new-messages,
> the resulting index folder (+mhe-index/sequence/unseen) does not list
> the source folder(s) for the found messages.  The folder should look
> something like
> 
>   +readLater/linux
>     4  02/28 [Van Snyder     ]  Re: Hardware question
>     6  02/28   [Greg Wooledge  ]  Re: Hardware question
>     8 %02/28 [Salvatore Bonac]  [SECURITY] [DSA 5872-1] xorg-server security upda
>   
>   +readLater/misc
>    22+t02/28 [Substack       ]  In-app video publishing, Notes stats, and a new t
>    23 %02/28 [Palo Alto Farme]  Shop the Market, Support Our Community
> 
> But this user is missing the "+readLater/linux" and "+readLater/misc"
> lines.
> 
> Furthermore, if the user views or deletes the message in the index
> folder, a corresponding action is supposed to be performed on the
> message in the source folder.  That's not happening.
> 
> Normally, messages in an MH-E index folder should have an
> "X-MHE-Checksum" header line.  The user reports that those headers are
> missing from the emails in the index folder.  MH-E uses this header to
> tie the entry in the index folder to the entry in the source folder, so
> their absence explains the above two problems.
> 
> The relevant code in MH-E is rather twisty, but it looks like the
> headers are missing due to a bug in mh-index-sequenced-messages.  MH-E
> calls out to an external program to compute the MD5 checksum for a
> message.  mh-index-sequenced-messages sets
> mh-search-next-result-function to mh-mairix-next-result, which
> works if the external program is md5sum, which is what Linux users
> usually get.
> 
> But the user reports that mh-checksum-cmd is set to invoke openssl,
> and it looks like MH-E is unable to parse the openssl output.
> 
> The reason for using an external program are historical.  (These
> problems are not a regression in Emacs 30.  The user also saw them with
> Emacs 29.)  MH-E should get rid of the current framework
> (mh-checksum-cmd, mh-checksum-parser, mh-checksum-choose, etc.) and just
> use Emacs's md5 function.

Bill, any comments or suggestions?

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#76655: 30.1; MH-E: "unseen" folder broken on OpenBSD
Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2025 09:09:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.76655.B76655.174082012231921 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 76655
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Mike Kupfer <kupfer@HIDDEN>, Bill Wohler <wohler@HIDDEN>
Cc: 76655 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 76655-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B76655.174082012231921
          (code B ref 76655); Sat, 01 Mar 2025 09:09:02 +0000
Received: (at 76655) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Mar 2025 09:08:42 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60888 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1toIpt-0008Ij-Fp
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2025 04:08:41 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34274)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1toIpq-0008IH-JI
 for 76655 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2025 04:08:39 -0500
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>)
 id 1toIpl-0008PN-4m; Sat, 01 Mar 2025 04:08:33 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
 mime-version; bh=4wpLSTU2zxH5LNF++/J/+4JWZc+I/ugJsSDUPrdQWH4=; b=hQCqSwYD2eXT
 XIGNhcneY+B58OFRO0n7wi+rggZiscRHtq4FeEU/RHp2rY57HOaTuLHDxdCcXTHRpiL2z2WSBZylT
 tlt7uTAhOPjHF5MR/qZCNuaZxSJamSms93w6has/nF2WP7XasHlaFCvz1o1d0OFsetb6Y0JKNacDK
 vDX7rm6paSC/v7gjjREU2BkTk8fjgACSIL11vbSEcAOPANjz5BHWHaKsCWxW32Qb+mTXh5YswuqR4
 uLqbIKvKZePOlD36ALJOSfH+yGKQkWIPZUCRhNR5I8y3wQc/P0h6gk1Ui8+b5v84hxYxxdAV0u2Vq
 lrk4CX6ZISbrGR70XC0xdA==;
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2025 11:08:30 +0200
Message-Id: <86ldtpqfsh.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <44996.1740794346@HIDDEN> (message from Mike
 Kupfer on Fri, 28 Feb 2025 17:59:06 -0800)
References: <36295.1740790601@HIDDEN>
 <44996.1740794346@HIDDEN>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

> From: Mike Kupfer <kupfer@HIDDEN>
> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 17:59:06 -0800
> 
> I looked at the code some more and ran an additional test.  I now think
> that the thing that I noticed about mh-search-next-result-function is
> unrelated to the checksum problem.  If I force Emacs on my Linux system
> to use openssl, I still get the proper results in the index folder, and
> I see a checksum header in a test email.
> 
> So there's something else peculiar about OpenBSD that I need to track
> down.  I'll try standing up an OpenBSD VM to reproduce the problem.
> 
> It would still be nice to replace the calls to an external program with
> the Emacs md5 function.

Thanks, but please don't change the Subject when you reply to a bug
discussion.  Doing so makes it harder to find related messages, at
least in Rmail.

I've restored the original Subject in this response message.

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#76655: 30.1; MH-E: "unseen" folder broken on OpenBSD
Resent-From: Bill Wohler <wohler@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2025 17:41:03 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.76655.B76655.17408508592328 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 76655
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Cc: 76655 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Mike Kupfer <kupfer@HIDDEN>
Received: via spool by 76655-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B76655.17408508592328
          (code B ref 76655); Sat, 01 Mar 2025 17:41:03 +0000
Received: (at 76655) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Mar 2025 17:40:59 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42995 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1toQpf-0000bT-1q
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2025 12:40:59 -0500
Received: from zebra.cherry.relay.mailchannels.net ([23.83.223.195]:63237)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <wohler@HIDDEN>) id 1toQpc-0000b4-Cu
 for 76655 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2025 12:40:57 -0500
X-Sender-Id: inmotionhosting|x-authuser|wohler@HIDDEN
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA0CF222A8;
 Sat,  1 Mar 2025 17:40:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ecbiz329.inmotionhosting.com
 (100-108-253-116.trex-nlb.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.108.253.116])
 (Authenticated sender: inmotionhosting)
 by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 43E5D2234C;
 Sat,  1 Mar 2025 17:40:54 +0000 (UTC)
ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-2022; d=mailchannels.net; t=1740850854; a=rsa-sha256;
 cv=none;
 b=x2xsyF3RJZfXwvi84XXDieNTT/vSRjgwv6StQESwysWjzerKemy+MdM/5z5CjmHc/RRvRY
 hvvVP2n+pT0LlQkWblHBR3C+GUWFSfj55ujI2iUQ30kEkaGe71NaaPhLGX6IYXDAtBHnJs
 bxeKPCkPoYW6IPEk6e14qAVEVY5Q9WaKl7kjIu7d2v1CBUeBIey0VklLZF72PGMD34rCZS
 ZXPiIeJiT0el9RdIrR8W8AQQrS6rBbfXk/7cYp1wVyHcVCGmhk1QFc9M2YCMU7ckxwDkhE
 2ZHicCWCsQbN3os13lPURjy6Eqw9KREq/j5KLBJvYqO6aQ+QFlVZLSMuKjNT+w==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=mailchannels.net; s=arc-2022; t=1740850854;
 h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature;
 bh=SFkfXnmF9iyJ90+N6lw4mstDgbO0/w2x+iglCoDlbgM=;
 b=DVdLeq3S15kpEJJshWQgYSB4ouJtjghzBikrK5yE3W0Ui+oME0uLeXZMMKDYk3uRHVvCKv
 5MxZXjT/2qcqK+fBGeqO9zSu1jwhbP32cyolzqV4zhyYM8L0KFDCLIBYd/LfWkjzzbqOId
 fwIilyFp/XEN2BrI7nmjs8b6H5IL8tJKBMHzVAm9s7vkn9LCDoCjvHLFCqwEpYSDSpEVNX
 /5L3fEKEWpWfcgP/50IW7+q4ilcABVWG3Zn/wv9zBe6TtfE71oa2owM7eWvR+zRDpa+khF
 l2H5L5l3Br5ai+g35rEXDyn56nulkp6hwe+nuPDSWzX4lcRYnauHA0boc1WhhQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; rspamd-58748c789d-mljr5;
 auth=pass smtp.auth=inmotionhosting smtp.mailfrom=wohler@HIDDEN
X-Sender-Id: inmotionhosting|x-authuser|wohler@HIDDEN
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: inmotionhosting|x-authuser|wohler@HIDDEN
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: inmotionhosting
X-Arithmetic-Dime: 62af944367417cdf_1740850854822_3741334666
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1740850854822:577256083
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1740850854822
Received: from ecbiz329.inmotionhosting.com (ecbiz329.inmotionhosting.com
 [209.182.198.38]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384)
 by 100.108.253.116 (trex/7.0.2); Sat, 01 Mar 2025 17:40:54 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=newt.com;
 s=default; h=Message-ID:Date:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:
 Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-reply-to:Subject:From:cc:To:Sender:
 Reply-To:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:
 Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe
 :List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
 bh=SFkfXnmF9iyJ90+N6lw4mstDgbO0/w2x+iglCoDlbgM=; b=CRZ8co9bvfaff2dFDlrhVuWGXS
 pFmreH/TXxFdxXLNhN3/1EfmtoJ3UBUKTuprG9udopL1SGHbT3HcyKK//LSi8HMOs1RSKO1V+mSur
 i/g3rEHXzJH8PpP+A38AhY+GN6hqX/ht5hAcGrSw6bEV/7ZgSbrjZt0d777Stkd+ZjCLfhZfAnZa2
 HR9BHpUqDGg7Kjf3gQ1wovlBA1AbNvcf2ZP4Qbmve9Qzn9xw0aYACrCVfFVXIzSbw8o0A5QJetmtO
 2KDuit1eNBHS1kzl39UkYDm68v/pS/yd017Y4bNjh8DNxYdLa6h3fmtBv1HCV7c/yOhli9RcPBZhw
 Mph0unLw==;
Received: from [174.62.80.102] (port=35100 helo=olgas.newt.com)
 by ecbiz329.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98.1)
 (envelope-from <wohler@HIDDEN>) id 1toQpY-00000008ziJ-45DK;
 Sat, 01 Mar 2025 12:40:53 -0500
Received: by olgas.newt.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id 1697B380195; Sat,  1 Mar 2025 09:40:52 -0800 (PST)
From: Bill Wohler <wohler@HIDDEN>
In-reply-to: <86senxqg7s.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <36295.1740790601@HIDDEN> <86senxqg7s.fsf@HIDDEN>
Comments: In-reply-to Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
 message dated "Sat, 01 Mar 2025 10:59:19 +0200."
Organization: Newt Software
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.8-RC2; Emacs 31.0.50
X-Image-URL: http://www.newt.com/wohler/images/bill-diving.png
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <981341.1740850852.1@HIDDEN>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2025 09:40:52 -0800
Message-ID: <981342.1740850852@HIDDEN>
X-AuthUser: wohler@HIDDEN
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> wrote:

> > From: Mike Kupfer <kupfer@HIDDEN>
> > Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 16:56:41 -0800
> > =

> > A user running 30.1 reported that when he runs mh-index-new-messages,
> > the resulting index folder (+mhe-index/sequence/unseen) does not list
> > the source folder(s) for the found messages.  The folder should look
> > something like
> > =

> >   +readLater/linux
> >     4  02/28 [Van Snyder     ]  Re: Hardware question
> >     6  02/28   [Greg Wooledge  ]  Re: Hardware question
> >     8 %02/28 [Salvatore Bonac]  [SECURITY] [DSA 5872-1] xorg-server se=
curity upda
> >   =

> >   +readLater/misc
> >    22+t02/28 [Substack       ]  In-app video publishing, Notes stats, =
and a new t
> >    23 %02/28 [Palo Alto Farme]  Shop the Market, Support Our Community
> > =

> > But this user is missing the "+readLater/linux" and "+readLater/misc"
> > lines.
> > =

> > Furthermore, if the user views or deletes the message in the index
> > folder, a corresponding action is supposed to be performed on the
> > message in the source folder.  That's not happening.
> > =

> > Normally, messages in an MH-E index folder should have an
> > "X-MHE-Checksum" header line.  The user reports that those headers are
> > missing from the emails in the index folder.  MH-E uses this header to
> > tie the entry in the index folder to the entry in the source folder, s=
o
> > their absence explains the above two problems.
> > =

> > The relevant code in MH-E is rather twisty, but it looks like the
> > headers are missing due to a bug in mh-index-sequenced-messages.  MH-E
> > calls out to an external program to compute the MD5 checksum for a
> > message.  mh-index-sequenced-messages sets
> > mh-search-next-result-function to mh-mairix-next-result, which
> > works if the external program is md5sum, which is what Linux users
> > usually get.
> > =

> > But the user reports that mh-checksum-cmd is set to invoke openssl,
> > and it looks like MH-E is unable to parse the openssl output.
> > =

> > The reason for using an external program are historical.  (These
> > problems are not a regression in Emacs 30.  The user also saw them wit=
h
> > Emacs 29.)  MH-E should get rid of the current framework
> > (mh-checksum-cmd, mh-checksum-parser, mh-checksum-choose, etc.) and ju=
st
> > use Emacs's md5 function.
> =

> Bill, any comments or suggestions?

Mike and I have been discussing this, and I agree that minimizing
dependencies and using the the internal (md5) function is a good thing.
As Mike mentioned in another email, there may be more going on on our
user's OpenBSD system that Mike is going to try to untangle.

-- =

Bill Wohler <wohler@HIDDEN> aka <Bill.Wohler@HIDDEN>
http://www.newt.com/wohler/, GnuPG ID:610BD9AD

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#76655: 30.1; MH-E: "unseen" folder broken on OpenBSD
Resent-From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2025 01:10:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.76655.B76655.17408777627168 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 76655
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Mike Kupfer <kupfer@HIDDEN>, 76655 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 76655-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B76655.17408777627168
          (code B ref 76655); Sun, 02 Mar 2025 01:10:01 +0000
Received: (at 76655) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Mar 2025 01:09:22 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47526 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1toXpZ-0001rV-48
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2025 20:09:21 -0500
Received: from mail-ed1-x52a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::52a]:56819)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <stefankangas@HIDDEN>)
 id 1toXpW-0001qi-8u
 for 76655 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2025 20:09:19 -0500
Received: by mail-ed1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id
 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5e50d491f69so1320712a12.1
 for <76655 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 01 Mar 2025 17:09:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1740877752; x=1741482552; darn=debbugs.gnu.org;
 h=to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from
 :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=iEB+aGZLazWCPYLreIZnQWSbeN6qaxNClpEP8DZNz2I=;
 b=VPXhMSxghOufp719CRFFA9SNrOQkaEa075lQcOU8y8cJ1Hia8b3htx+rN0EUFT/265
 sskK6vu9JJdLlaC60R3c+hHqg3t/C6T9nD+A9f9Cf9Q2gdeEPhA0ZQ4iRO/Ppw1Njtv4
 +3ru7B/1tPtAYaQqviYP2Um1fngAg0Kqbk3eHjoPP7nXuQ6xEwswm9NrK6KXzBDNh1Im
 Ak94KB+ASr4RJoShjF1FrnkAzH4myb0SGFY+JlaVgDord05qjqMVtAcvqWyckOaIxoVM
 h+M4cUEL5/0uD7ILQ8bx6QTe1SeUh6h37KvoA4mXzmc/Rg1TB+G56KIUezpdg9bNvHA9
 ynCQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1740877752; x=1741482552;
 h=to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from
 :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=iEB+aGZLazWCPYLreIZnQWSbeN6qaxNClpEP8DZNz2I=;
 b=BFya+yp6D9SC0PjrxeWVfaPDRfeRWHxR6jrjetpvhs8c5oXjWyRbMd94QYk9CWSod8
 iqfb28rii/qtztQlzVqBOdFZpNHmbZDdIV0RDr5oNu6XVkoxiBCriM41nBleGYOjp6AB
 KqPJ6+f/9Wl0n3TYRvgPIjqMGGSa4RsW5XVhYPCvJ1utIyAZxYw8RwrXqm1IgOCC256N
 mPupcn1LIGQdtGo7UWXIvDC970v5ssefRtYb8c0AwkWGlf6UphBO2haNz5nK3YIVIZPT
 vCSm7OI1wjenwBGEqZFlS4BwSmOqmkl/+KW3IifakkPGKDt+CnQsFeEeBIIhs7IV06nK
 CjEA==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1;
 AJvYcCU2DePPHMVzXAayhFDaPcC5BgidGj1P6C26/zEQedtpPByWPykNhjoPDMBXAzm1/mHAFsVmRg==@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxd3gyrvtFQ0PHNNUCuHDqAT9WHMUQKW4Fo9kcU7FqoW48bmVrt
 jyH5ueuQYOk1eiz8CqI6v//EGIUrwaVY7tkEsBN4iXiRDnLDX5hzxtm2RslHR+ZSH/V1nf5WbB1
 Z3es+16/Cko/fNL7z/uzxEQ+msy8oK8+H1LQ=
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnct0awlDuze+WuLrjzNWPaSsGMTNJ8ZKP31IFDFCmX9R4cbCSZrKd1PP6T85fJ/
 3FTDPEmGwDJmycFCIGFMxlfmGKtW/9aBep1qP6NGT5NLdPZx5BJGotc5BoDariK2FXXqbqLxm2g
 ZQhRe99uIX9sV0Ab1nUIIrrIkQDw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFQnUp7NVianXpZeTBfB9USMMfgasI0ikD2pKHP0RG2f/mtol52fmyBFfhNCrNQgIKyKuzpz6UeoO0K/kYDZ1c=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:3548:b0:5de:cbed:c955 with SMTP id
 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5e4d6b050d7mr7467895a12.17.1740877751967; Sat, 01 Mar 2025
 17:09:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with
 HTTPREST; Sun, 2 Mar 2025 01:09:11 +0000
From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <36295.1740790601@HIDDEN>
References: <36295.1740790601@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2025 01:09:11 +0000
X-Gm-Features: AQ5f1JoTUW7NJb46f0gxTYKYVB4MzJm78eZHzsTK6FyfNi1ccoP1_KE2uEd7A8k
Message-ID: <CADwFkm=mPExP8zcbDFTHnd+HfEV_TMRLRfCc6jG0SP=Nx8VmLQ@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Mike Kupfer <kupfer@HIDDEN> writes:

> The reason for using an external program are historical.  (These
> problems are not a regression in Emacs 30.  The user also saw them with
> Emacs 29.)  MH-E should get rid of the current framework
> (mh-checksum-cmd, mh-checksum-parser, mh-checksum-choose, etc.) and just
> use Emacs's md5 function.

FWIW, I'd use `secure-hash' instead, if possible:

    (secure-hash 'md5 "foo")

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#76655: 30.1; MH-E: "unseen" folder broken on OpenBSD
Resent-From: Mike Kupfer <kupfer@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2025 01:52:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.76655.B76655.174088031313927 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 76655
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@HIDDEN>
Cc: 76655 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 76655-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B76655.174088031313927
          (code B ref 76655); Sun, 02 Mar 2025 01:52:01 +0000
Received: (at 76655) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Mar 2025 01:51:53 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47925 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1toYUi-0003cZ-T0
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2025 20:51:53 -0500
Received: from shell1.rawbw.com ([198.144.192.42]:32815 ident=root)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <kupfer@HIDDEN>) id 1toYUf-0003cM-R7
 for 76655 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2025 20:51:50 -0500
Received: from alto.camomileplus.org (135-180-175-182.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net
 [135.180.175.182] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0)
 by shell1.rawbw.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id 5221phMO039345
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);
 Sat, 1 Mar 2025 17:51:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kupfer@HIDDEN)
X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host
 135-180-175-182.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [135.180.175.182] (may be forged)
 claimed to be alto.camomileplus.org
From: Mike Kupfer <kupfer@HIDDEN>
In-reply-to: <CADwFkm=mPExP8zcbDFTHnd+HfEV_TMRLRfCc6jG0SP=Nx8VmLQ@HIDDEN>
References: <36295.1740790601@HIDDEN>
 <CADwFkm=mPExP8zcbDFTHnd+HfEV_TMRLRfCc6jG0SP=Nx8VmLQ@HIDDEN>
Comments: In-reply-to Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@HIDDEN>
 message dated "Sun, 02 Mar 2025 01:09:11 +0000."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.8-RC2; Emacs 30.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <21469.1740880303.1@HIDDEN>
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2025 17:51:43 -0800
Message-ID: <21470.1740880303@HIDDEN>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Stefan Kangas wrote:

> FWIW, I'd use `secure-hash' instead, if possible:
> 
>     (secure-hash 'md5 "foo")

What's the advantage of using 'secure-hash' instead of 'md5'?

mike

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#76655: 30.1; MH-E: "unseen" folder broken on OpenBSD
Resent-From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2025 02:25:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.76655.B76655.174088229026294 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 76655
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Mike Kupfer <kupfer@HIDDEN>
Cc: 76655 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 76655-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B76655.174088229026294
          (code B ref 76655); Sun, 02 Mar 2025 02:25:02 +0000
Received: (at 76655) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Mar 2025 02:24:50 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48293 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1toZ0c-0006q0-8U
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2025 21:24:50 -0500
Received: from mail-ed1-x52f.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::52f]:42122)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <stefankangas@HIDDEN>)
 id 1toZ0Y-0006pN-U4
 for 76655 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2025 21:24:47 -0500
Received: by mail-ed1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id
 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5dccaaca646so6511142a12.0
 for <76655 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 01 Mar 2025 18:24:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1740882281; x=1741487081; darn=debbugs.gnu.org;
 h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to
 :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=E1V784ij4FMRMdyffYnNVL5xpL9NsdDxXqtm9O0B0mU=;
 b=fikA00OcJaaaZTRPXgODn3Yxqzhbzu6tiuWclTZL9QYPnlK78rZpmRRdvSpCM5jAOH
 Bb3QHRro+CaJjj6VpM7wtHM/j0qfOjg/J45tdACFWdPIE8kAhAmKPqC/KmWIk8BgZeV3
 PIs7vr0EFoF94cz+5QNdOPEGUQHWmZyCeCfuil7mHHOSx4UvDU9K2JxFaTM3S5zc3iU1
 hvdZjB/erKxc5fx5AKXQIrHuU3/vzbKqkyHOSEiaX6Vtr1Ggp53s7TtiSK1e7QfcO2JV
 8IEHQ30uDn4JrMs6YSzi4jcONGL6Y3XhgLipdn0F4xqoRcWdmoxw6i2oR7U6+XTQ7cpu
 HPrQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1740882281; x=1741487081;
 h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to
 :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=E1V784ij4FMRMdyffYnNVL5xpL9NsdDxXqtm9O0B0mU=;
 b=O6Gj93xLQTt1TM4ZJRuzmsUebIlU7HsL24SRxaSbw1cqd7//SyEfdlNA8BJIRm4OEG
 YKA2oqZXmNq0OH8x+WpvUfnloTYKBl/NLq+o60F/4B18QUEYMmoY+Sx+dvRdooCReeGj
 sI5ABd8GacsVeR13gYK6kyShfsXFB0tBw6288BA17YOGQkY2GIjP02O/J/KJaZVDO0OU
 HJvhdgv58v5ddcJmmCkCHsIdPsCVuAuH6V4dJqSPLKkVWgC8v8lE0EaMmuFU/KlIyXb+
 /qk3JIn7bwZTmtpmturvEPp5mXqdVdGwxEFL6gaGfQbADXB9/M71BBu2O6+Ay7iHkwbN
 fpLw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Ywqe8p3JUv6yo/yqIuxXp37TrcPA9ojO9K8yWcEMW5kmCvuUngt
 GD/eB0q0b0bjhdUqN1E/v7RoAf9sX+Bu9fAwFpLpXo3+TgE3vrYn63l3IO5NcicqCoPzAxbtXEd
 tSviQH3pdk1HFvKgCKpWhaIsyyOk=
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncs79VNZ/QcSIEHPoxNOHt7K8/IZcNd5TOcHBSx7YJtHhBugi/r0DvM2FwGYYnV
 KGTA2MJ7voJL3EIpZNeNaU07fQjgo5kNFix9NobBC5UBjz3c/8teQid2X4SFjkonB6rLunlJCKk
 33w1ae4shUArcE2PV4ZKf+WX22fw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFTauYjQ+x5uRfCfk12dwEVO5dSuG+WUQ5XaFpRietCjSoCSwCvXbzLgfbOoyREK8bN5/6GPWZhXlgodGcrGpg=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:5242:b0:5db:e88c:914f with SMTP id
 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5e4d52bd87emr11328468a12.4.1740882280592; Sat, 01 Mar 2025
 18:24:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with
 HTTPREST; Sun, 2 Mar 2025 02:24:40 +0000
From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <21470.1740880303@HIDDEN>
References: <36295.1740790601@HIDDEN>
 <CADwFkm=mPExP8zcbDFTHnd+HfEV_TMRLRfCc6jG0SP=Nx8VmLQ@HIDDEN>
 <21470.1740880303@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2025 02:24:40 +0000
X-Gm-Features: AQ5f1JqI9m3cykhz9tIlguySRkrNl-XK8jbm4nuEnMJ2zvGfgDvLaDBHxplPsxw
Message-ID: <CADwFkm=wSjarz4YWQpvtnB9BYeMEi9ggTMhvas=qnLxDKJWCPA@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Mike Kupfer <kupfer@HIDDEN> writes:

> Stefan Kangas wrote:
>
>> FWIW, I'd use `secure-hash' instead, if possible:
>>
>>     (secure-hash 'md5 "foo")
>
> What's the advantage of using 'secure-hash' instead of 'md5'?

I just think it's a better API, e.g. it doesn't have NOERROR and it has
BINARY.  It also supports other hashing algorithms.

Just my two cents, of course.

Last modified: Sun, 2 Mar 2025 02:30:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.