GNU logs - #76964, boring messages


Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#76964: 31.0.50; completion-preview-mode uses a lot of CPU
Resent-From: Geza Herman <geza.herman@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 23:09:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.76964.B.1741734518445 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: report 76964
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: 76964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.1741734518445
          (code B ref -1); Tue, 11 Mar 2025 23:09:02 +0000
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Mar 2025 23:08:38 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46253 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1ts8iD-000077-Do
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 19:08:37 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:52294)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <geza.herman@HIDDEN>)
 id 1ts8iA-00006m-CL
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 19:08:35 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <geza.herman@HIDDEN>)
 id 1ts8hx-0001Ti-NE
 for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 19:08:22 -0400
Received: from mail-wr1-x42d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42d])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <geza.herman@HIDDEN>)
 id 1ts8hr-0003Dy-5X
 for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 19:08:21 -0400
Received: by mail-wr1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id
 ffacd0b85a97d-3913fdd0120so1991355f8f.0
 for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 16:08:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1741734488; x=1742339288; darn=gnu.org;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:subject:from:to:content-language
 :user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date
 :message-id:reply-to;
 bh=taslElpV47ANFIaANQnhSyimc3qgii0XJUj6D8d3nV4=;
 b=Dg+pTMQbkQfaPMgDN5pzv0N2ce0hcoFZXvmwX9e4P+5PIpXYmcCiwhcZP9AuzERbms
 Dkrep9QnrkCPLFbIzFF/RJ6Wn9fdCMYPQD9LEWecaG0vRhn1ZZ9N/9gW1jkm+gfFMAAq
 B7rRmlBqjlpva/agzMk7tx1GDywHEEiwx+CGwcPQcTH1PxkhMsDQ8mirvfxMYyg24kNz
 CKf/HtX5PAjet4L5stEKUoLh6JnXK5tc1BHlNwdabqtxCaiUW57ixdZwxAvG6cB64DaL
 E4T5OLwESqaBm0NgLXiKubdAqiQQCKu129w/uViKwF6xSEexj9ph8QaZeDcOxEFAP15t
 EzyA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1741734488; x=1742339288;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:subject:from:to:content-language
 :user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to
 :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=taslElpV47ANFIaANQnhSyimc3qgii0XJUj6D8d3nV4=;
 b=IVyRCGmaoCZly8wmaYDovbcsgJH5BnV2DO5JBCQIF1n6mtKaLnhLmfZ7QVpPseC6d6
 eFyRdv6qpcxRhxtXp2cqvC15cEVerkXBMwWTO/6UTWVBzCjsa86J/HtKKfle/ZmYi0AZ
 5vhUw2cCwn2PZDR59J5cMuXw7q13yRewK9DpODdVeTMsG0uwzxGoD4HHtoD1BnxDeJpp
 kbEbeLSvWEy59Guj6xjf598uVFoTSfP0Vm1fmu3qyISVYiIgpNVy95HoFcumzqVAiTxj
 raoYG62oqY+lYGUAvs2EQTmu/Oc1/sdTPD+vOzoBXOt0IOqKeogZPMmXxlNeHrnF1tba
 lJbA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxM1QjP6tiYf72KXSe8C6QUuKrLcwJJJezyKLc18AjWeI5tINVs
 DZjWuiOnOF8PwiWQXUS6GBxdc6+U2G49DNT22xhZkIkF+iF7j9wmfBEscg==
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvQxib41Z/uWCqW2FCb8pNKdcUTZaO9NR02uw/wTNDpoF3gKirbq/ClOgS0HLq
 pRodi1MNBwzoD00/4mBI/6TdlTid1gYDzW6ryJ/6Jkpbt5xf9AgGJ33ZwDmYvIcFfR04UxphL/4
 Sx0Abnpu8q01n5cjPV//GbqalXYZKZYr/sj8hInyLLTKeAJbbtZTVeHVB7zmbTom3Z7aB13ONrk
 79QCcZpRbIdrAEH6hNWkWfsdnRGQo8MsKovd2ZWBt5inRPI41R9G4uY5oH+MB6PnnB8ON3z7ou/
 5/fXsh5RQnG+tS+2ITIZBmNvuYGBt3I/iHZQmEHwF+6qK8aEwKGREdPoNJbElwQrLN2/J3+nHho
 A9LtQvBvhApXnww==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE6SMKVcOYNsrX9mufw6yGJza/EfQpihXvj/WzxIy248YRI1fyQP1h/xJ74wZ16sWJTW9x0hA==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6d04:0:b0:390:f0ff:2bf8 with SMTP id
 ffacd0b85a97d-39132d05f78mr15534566f8f.10.1741734488361; 
 Tue, 11 Mar 2025 16:08:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.65] (1F2EF086.nat.pool.telekom.hu. [31.46.240.134])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 ffacd0b85a97d-3912c0194f2sm19666271f8f.54.2025.03.11.16.08.06
 for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Tue, 11 Mar 2025 16:08:07 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <dd4c510c-26f0-4922-99cd-8bfa32fdd07c@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 00:08:05 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
From: Geza Herman <geza.herman@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::42d;
 envelope-from=geza.herman@HIDDEN; helo=mail-wr1-x42d.google.com
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)

When moving around a buffer with completion-preview-mode enabled, CPU 
usage becomes very high.

Profiling the problem reveals that with completion-preview-mode, 
redisplay_internal takes much more CPU.

The problem is in completion-preview--post-command, which calls 
(completion-preview-active-mode -1). For some reason, even though this 
should be a nop when just moving around a buffer, it forces emacs to do 
some more thorough redisplay. If I change this code to "(when 
completion-preview-active-mode (completion-preview-active-mode -1))", 
the problem goes away.

I think the problem is inside the define-minor-mode macro, because if I 
change completion-preview-active-mode to an empty minor mode definition:

(define-minor-mode completion-preview-active-mode
   "Mode for when the completion preview is shown."
   :interactive nil)

the problem still happens. Note: looking inside the define-minor-mode 
macro, I see a (force-mode-line-update) call. I'm not sure it's related, 
but it has a chance that it is.

In GNU Emacs 31.0.50 (build 1, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, cairo version
  1.18.2) of 2025-03-11 built on okoska
Repository revision: 57f7d5f44a136c95958030b7920e5eca4b285309
Repository branch: HEAD
Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.12101013
System Description: Debian GNU/Linux trixie/sid

Configured using:
  'configure --with-native-compilation --without-compress-install
  --without-gconf --without-gsettings --without-dbus --with-small-ja-dic
  --with-json --with-xinput2 --with-x-toolkit=no --with-tree-sitter
  --with-cairo --with-cairo-xcb --disable-silent-rules
  --disable-gc-mark-trace 'CFLAGS=-mtune=native -march=native -g3 -O3''

Configured features:
ACL CAIRO FREETYPE GIF GLIB GMP GNUTLS HARFBUZZ JPEG LCMS2 LIBOTF
LIBSELINUX LIBSYSTEMD LIBXML2 M17N_FLT MODULES NATIVE_COMP NOTIFY
INOTIFY OLDXMENU PDUMPER PNG RSVG SECCOMP SOUND SQLITE3 THREADS TIFF
TREE_SITTER WEBP X11 XDBE XIM XINERAMA XINPUT2 XPM XRANDR ZLIB

Important settings:
   value of $LC_ALL: C.UTF-8
   value of $LANG: en_US.UTF-8
   value of $XMODIFIERS: @im=none
   locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix

Major mode: Lisp Interaction

Minor modes in effect:
   tooltip-mode: t
   global-eldoc-mode: t
   eldoc-mode: t
   show-paren-mode: t
   electric-indent-mode: t
   mouse-wheel-mode: t
   tool-bar-mode: t
   menu-bar-mode: t
   file-name-shadow-mode: t
   global-font-lock-mode: t
   font-lock-mode: t
   blink-cursor-mode: t
   minibuffer-regexp-mode: t
   line-number-mode: t
   indent-tabs-mode: t
   transient-mark-mode: t
   auto-composition-mode: t
   auto-encryption-mode: t
   auto-compression-mode: t

Load-path shadows:
None found.

Features:
(shadow sort mail-extr compile comint ansi-osc ansi-color ring comp-run
bytecomp byte-compile comp-common rx emacsbug lisp-mnt message mailcap
yank-media puny dired dired-loaddefs rfc822 mml mml-sec password-cache
epa derived epg rfc6068 epg-config gnus-util text-property-search
time-date subr-x mm-decode mm-bodies mm-encode mail-parse rfc2231
mailabbrev gmm-utils mailheader cl-loaddefs cl-lib sendmail rfc2047
rfc2045 ietf-drums mm-util mail-prsvr mail-utils rmc iso-transl tooltip
cconv eldoc paren electric uniquify ediff-hook vc-hooks lisp-float-type
elisp-mode mwheel term/x-win x-win term/common-win x-dnd touch-screen
tool-bar dnd fontset image regexp-opt fringe tabulated-list replace
newcomment text-mode lisp-mode prog-mode register page tab-bar menu-bar
rfn-eshadow isearch easymenu timer select scroll-bar mouse jit-lock
font-lock syntax font-core term/tty-colors frame minibuffer nadvice seq
simple cl-generic indonesian philippine cham georgian utf-8-lang
misc-lang vietnamese tibetan thai tai-viet lao korean japanese eucjp-ms
cp51932 hebrew greek romanian slovak czech european ethiopic indian
cyrillic chinese composite emoji-zwj charscript charprop case-table
epa-hook jka-cmpr-hook help abbrev obarray oclosure cl-preloaded button
loaddefs theme-loaddefs faces cus-face macroexp files window
text-properties overlay sha1 md5 base64 format env code-pages mule
custom widget keymap hashtable-print-readable backquote threads inotify
lcms2 dynamic-setting font-render-setting cairo xinput2 x multi-tty
move-toolbar make-network-process tty-child-frames native-compile emacs)

Memory information:
((conses 16 85565 10951) (symbols 48 6794 0) (strings 32 23179 2179)
  (string-bytes 1 688051) (vectors 16 15115)
  (vector-slots 8 174583 11632) (floats 8 35 1) (intervals 56 332 0)
  (buffers 992 12))





Message sent:


Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Geza Herman <geza.herman@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#76964: Acknowledgement (31.0.50; completion-preview-mode uses
 a lot of CPU)
Message-ID: <handler.76964.B.1741734518445.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <dd4c510c-26f0-4922-99cd-8bfa32fdd07c@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 76964
X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs
Reply-To: 76964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 23:09:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 76964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
76964: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D76964
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems


Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#76964: 31.0.50; completion-preview-mode uses a lot of CPU
Resent-From: Eshel Yaron <me@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 06:49:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.76964.B76964.17417621247348 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 76964
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Geza Herman <geza.herman@HIDDEN>
Cc: 76964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 76964-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B76964.17417621247348
          (code B ref 76964); Wed, 12 Mar 2025 06:49:01 +0000
Received: (at 76964) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Mar 2025 06:48:44 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47063 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1tsFtU-0001uS-7M
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 02:48:44 -0400
Received: from mail.eshelyaron.com ([107.175.124.16]:32792 helo=eshelyaron.com)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <me@HIDDEN>) id 1tsFtR-0001uI-Ci
 for 76964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 02:48:42 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eshelyaron.com;
 s=mail; t=1741762120;
 bh=930Jqm1AWljUd0Hcyu5wGtwGz4sWw4IYjjXX0p6G9nw=;
 h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From;
 b=J7W/pyJl5xgst9Sh9KK7ksuOZlr6lP9R8qw6lrRVxiI3jP/53PgGtjy36uGhmPHHm
 +/KTxw//X3ggRTWHd9VB+UDcYtEUct5mLMl2fKOAHb3VsP/3KYhdX52xrFr/na4l53
 t3GLBYyKnGw9oMeVEkXCccAEY3e+H4I0fdhglp2AP6+2uNLzV70bhPu9zdLPpEXcHZ
 C9/z92i5WVkWIE2W56KN/lVBFM2xX4VQeRFQkAWWZz8o0j0RF+8nc5zx/iRF2iCAQs
 dlrJhTHVzkTQqZDkebaDk9k/ijNNuoD5F5+w5FAZspl084RUniKB4ykmfxJb9YqBJJ
 exQ2BUrl7JJ2Q==
From: Eshel Yaron <me@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <dd4c510c-26f0-4922-99cd-8bfa32fdd07c@HIDDEN>
References: <dd4c510c-26f0-4922-99cd-8bfa32fdd07c@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 07:48:38 +0100
Message-ID: <m14izyiw1l.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Hi Geza,

Geza Herman <geza.herman@HIDDEN> writes:

> When moving around a buffer with completion-preview-mode enabled, CPU
> usage becomes very high.
>
> Profiling the problem reveals that with completion-preview-mode,
> redisplay_internal takes much more CPU.
>
> The problem is in completion-preview--post-command, which calls
> (completion-preview-active-mode -1). For some reason, even though this
> should be a nop when just moving around a buffer, it forces emacs to
> do some more thorough redisplay. If I change this code to "(when
> completion-preview-active-mode (completion-preview-active-mode -1))",
> the problem goes away.
>
> I think the problem is inside the define-minor-mode macro, because if
> I change completion-preview-active-mode to an empty minor mode
> definition:
>
> (define-minor-mode completion-preview-active-mode
> =C2=A0 "Mode for when the completion preview is shown."
> =C2=A0 :interactive nil)
>
> the problem still happens. Note: looking inside the define-minor-mode
> macro, I see a (force-mode-line-update) call. I'm not sure it's
> related, but it has a chance that it is.

Thanks for investigating and reporting.  I think that conditioning the
(completion-preview-active-mode -1) in completion-preview--post-command
as you suggest makes sense.  Would you like to provide a simple patch
with that change?


Best,

Eshel




Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#76964: 31.0.50; completion-preview-mode uses a lot of CPU
Resent-From: Eshel Yaron <me@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2025 09:18:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.76964.B76964.174211665125274 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 76964
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Geza Herman <geza.herman@HIDDEN>
Cc: 76964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 76964-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B76964.174211665125274
          (code B ref 76964); Sun, 16 Mar 2025 09:18:02 +0000
Received: (at 76964) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Mar 2025 09:17:31 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45420 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1ttk7d-0006ZR-FN
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2025 05:17:30 -0400
Received: from mail.eshelyaron.com ([107.175.124.16]:51062 helo=eshelyaron.com)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <me@HIDDEN>) id 1ttk7a-0006Yh-4o
 for 76964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2025 05:17:27 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eshelyaron.com;
 s=mail; t=1742116645;
 bh=lj3+b8fSf+sxhqtcDEoQdLhVbEhfmqMgnzdE06BRYv0=;
 h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From;
 b=EsdDRdScGKGl4JKc+UX0NQOaadnJKktUrTLIkC0Vl+6VNGuVQPGOIULKZM533ostb
 G+fc1u3d5M3obysi9mfEfQ+v/z0ccmbTTYgCkk6yviWAHT2dLvBL4KBppyP3CxPDrg
 BY0cArHejdHvwwkG3Udy+M/uwIwVlSsTT2K4IBX8vB/BDvJZuPNBmRdctILJkht7Bi
 DK9QVlsb7LD7d4XYhlOypfn2xF4NPBd0+QjNj0drfGA26BTRNvd6JKglky/PS/nJIM
 Y3uEmygGOyediWz3rSlFJZmyYRK9mIvbNU+uICtppw4RcRV0FJDwHtp1YiXQFRTM+s
 +bpc6508jUNQw==
From: Eshel Yaron <me@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <m14izyiw1l.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <dd4c510c-26f0-4922-99cd-8bfa32fdd07c@HIDDEN>
 <m14izyiw1l.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2025 10:17:23 +0100
Message-ID: <m1msdlibbw.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Eshel Yaron <me@HIDDEN> writes:

> Geza Herman <geza.herman@HIDDEN> writes:
>
>> When moving around a buffer with completion-preview-mode enabled, CPU
>> usage becomes very high.
>>
>> Profiling the problem reveals that with completion-preview-mode,
>> redisplay_internal takes much more CPU.
>>
>> The problem is in completion-preview--post-command, which calls
>> (completion-preview-active-mode -1). For some reason, even though this
>> should be a nop when just moving around a buffer, it forces emacs to
>> do some more thorough redisplay. If I change this code to "(when
>> completion-preview-active-mode (completion-preview-active-mode -1))",
>> the problem goes away.
>>
>> I think the problem is inside the define-minor-mode macro, because if
>> I change completion-preview-active-mode to an empty minor mode
>> definition:
>>
>> (define-minor-mode completion-preview-active-mode
>> =C2=A0 "Mode for when the completion preview is shown."
>> =C2=A0 :interactive nil)
>>
>> the problem still happens. Note: looking inside the define-minor-mode
>> macro, I see a (force-mode-line-update) call. I'm not sure it's
>> related, but it has a chance that it is.
>
> Thanks for investigating and reporting.  I think that conditioning the
> (completion-preview-active-mode -1) in completion-preview--post-command
> as you suggest makes sense.  Would you like to provide a simple patch
> with that change?

I've now pushed such a change along with some additional commentary to
the emacs-30 branch in commit b6b4a080a3a.  It should make its way to
master soon enough.  Could you please check whether that improves
performance for you?


Thanks,

Eshel





Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#76964: 31.0.50; completion-preview-mode uses a lot of CPU
Resent-From: Geza Herman <geza.herman@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2025 15:50:05 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.76964.B76964.174214015514523 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 76964
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Eshel Yaron <me@HIDDEN>
Cc: 76964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 76964-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B76964.174214015514523
          (code B ref 76964); Sun, 16 Mar 2025 15:50:05 +0000
Received: (at 76964) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Mar 2025 15:49:15 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50418 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1ttqEk-0003m8-SS
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2025 11:49:15 -0400
Received: from mail-wr1-x42f.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42f]:49300)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <geza.herman@HIDDEN>)
 id 1ttqEi-0003lB-BY
 for 76964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2025 11:49:13 -0400
Received: by mail-wr1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id
 ffacd0b85a97d-390e3b3d3f4so2121266f8f.2
 for <76964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 16 Mar 2025 08:49:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1742140146; x=1742744946; darn=debbugs.gnu.org;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language
 :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id
 :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=QOJRkIq+KscdOw7fL0U2LZJz2PsjT5gK2UjVWxkebWs=;
 b=DNFcALek6nKl/19k3NI1WxnVEEKBQ4ZC6yly9FQByF1yx1yfP1Nkgaw8KpffjsEV1J
 f6tNIxiJ1jMelgTbgM3BcL2U+G2ZpMpCi7y5a8kFmcY+EQuGxfKU3Y72PvJ9hYRqESzd
 zCX35IWu74NEBFVFrLKm29W3sOFQO8H5FyJuuYL7xFiDBBC4RhNGN8sLATWGIHwuxmw5
 YxEnHC1SpGr/Zu2dd58q4fDKN2HJs28kqC9WdZLWGS/lajoY6/KMqJnNxExdFahW96g0
 qw5fv8cVkscR5e2Czs7o+9LPPDG2LeC8zzFJjeqe+pF97yQIIUPEg5gy4bFG8zXR/SsF
 SCzw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1742140146; x=1742744946;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language
 :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id
 :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=QOJRkIq+KscdOw7fL0U2LZJz2PsjT5gK2UjVWxkebWs=;
 b=Pa9XIo8lT2ojY51o6/P2EZMUi/+E/X/oo0FC8ODgBd25jr8jH9n4HCwpuVqeK6wB7Y
 zowyjYdquPV10F8Pbl/f1WeqbsxlAd9i6FBjxbDZcKmpMALG3gsd+9QVlr2zi8IMxZLu
 yRYtXeTLmVBtxLIs+Ww9Ux1Y+i37ZnMMv14xsW/HrirbkZHoPiwYsgvcoUA7yMovVDHs
 gzVWrwCtZupldrwGGyBLxoRNFi22jURfEhBxbNtxr0zqh8d1rxcjQlYRIYpuRLcG6daZ
 eRsN8LNp4/D6ESSnCek79v6f+DqpyOpP8XwE17Ay4SGXL7sZtLoWk6nP1oxScCFtbSO7
 mCYg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw9I1Q/i/T2jIZfXDTQLFXAMd33RTwuhxbuoQhXk25in+JZtZjR
 d195EGu3UQ4fmtbAvC7R83arkT42ZmOqWZ5xF4ykVrew+2+6nOnzTWlOdQ==
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuCL3W13Qv8XfkR6YVzCtTXESqyiyMy8VbvefrSC/3GxGUFkGBX+5eOlDYQNUK
 KKhJXewVZmovgZeEseMgBCscaIdPQYPDdcc2MnQEhcLYUsjGQ2Sg/c21ZfwA5xyP3mKxRY6kFeC
 uX194NWyE56DPFK2sWPhlISCmZ9uZcKrzJ0WlEs4LQrqMU/5iggSprxk1JtaWskzqOrJc7FQmeK
 wSf1lzKlrEiRfw+sXdfwFwjo4/MKgX9pJp+jTVnP8ZU+E0j/escULapZNYDEe9C+8nF5G90woYq
 Qu7/GPUA8uXR+IsEmqcchRpF8Zd5enzS33354p/e7sG8VjK+OYP7C3q3XXtj84u2+Ybu127Iz06
 p4m4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFwZdOW+H8+gRadwmdbmoSVnevJ/26+o4fgt9CTnMpkf/dsgUZHOKTd2f7CBK5ofzlGVm5yAw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:4012:b0:391:4389:f36a with SMTP id
 ffacd0b85a97d-3971ffb3cefmr13042790f8f.48.1742140145483; 
 Sun, 16 Mar 2025 08:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.65] (1F2EF7F2.nat.pool.telekom.hu. [31.46.247.242])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 5b1f17b1804b1-43d200fae32sm80195055e9.31.2025.03.16.08.49.04
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Sun, 16 Mar 2025 08:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5aface42-2b80-4612-bf81-0e7992feb90a@HIDDEN>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2025 16:49:04 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
References: <dd4c510c-26f0-4922-99cd-8bfa32fdd07c@HIDDEN>
 <m14izyiw1l.fsf@HIDDEN> <m1msdlibbw.fsf@HIDDEN>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Geza Herman <geza.herman@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <m1msdlibbw.fsf@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Hi Eshel,

Thanks, the new version seems to work correctly!

(Sorry, I was meant to create a patch, for before that I asked a 
question in emacs-devel about the behavior of define-minor-mode, and I 
was waiting for a response - got none so far)

Geza


On 3/16/25 10:17 AM, Eshel Yaron wrote:
> Eshel Yaron <me@HIDDEN> writes:
>
>> Geza Herman <geza.herman@HIDDEN> writes:
>>
>>> When moving around a buffer with completion-preview-mode enabled, CPU
>>> usage becomes very high.
>>>
>>> Profiling the problem reveals that with completion-preview-mode,
>>> redisplay_internal takes much more CPU.
>>>
>>> The problem is in completion-preview--post-command, which calls
>>> (completion-preview-active-mode -1). For some reason, even though this
>>> should be a nop when just moving around a buffer, it forces emacs to
>>> do some more thorough redisplay. If I change this code to "(when
>>> completion-preview-active-mode (completion-preview-active-mode -1))",
>>> the problem goes away.
>>>
>>> I think the problem is inside the define-minor-mode macro, because if
>>> I change completion-preview-active-mode to an empty minor mode
>>> definition:
>>>
>>> (define-minor-mode completion-preview-active-mode
>>>    "Mode for when the completion preview is shown."
>>>    :interactive nil)
>>>
>>> the problem still happens. Note: looking inside the define-minor-mode
>>> macro, I see a (force-mode-line-update) call. I'm not sure it's
>>> related, but it has a chance that it is.
>> Thanks for investigating and reporting.  I think that conditioning the
>> (completion-preview-active-mode -1) in completion-preview--post-command
>> as you suggest makes sense.  Would you like to provide a simple patch
>> with that change?
> I've now pushed such a change along with some additional commentary to
> the emacs-30 branch in commit b6b4a080a3a.  It should make its way to
> master soon enough.  Could you please check whether that improves
> performance for you?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Eshel
>





Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#76964: 31.0.50; completion-preview-mode uses a lot of CPU
Resent-From: Eshel Yaron <me@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2025 18:15:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.76964.B76964.174214889710277 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 76964
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Geza Herman <geza.herman@HIDDEN>
Cc: 76964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 76964-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B76964.174214889710277
          (code B ref 76964); Sun, 16 Mar 2025 18:15:01 +0000
Received: (at 76964) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Mar 2025 18:14:57 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50656 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1ttsVl-0002fg-Ea
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2025 14:14:57 -0400
Received: from mail.eshelyaron.com ([107.175.124.16]:52542 helo=eshelyaron.com)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <me@HIDDEN>)
 id 1ttsVi-0002fT-Cf; Sun, 16 Mar 2025 14:14:54 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eshelyaron.com;
 s=mail; t=1742148893;
 bh=s+9nBhanIEy3jb8T+BmSNOyaWnPblKFphaE8UZbIXBA=;
 h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From;
 b=aM+xh+iri5gFPwYLz06JHmLkmvg4mXddMHGsUTnbVO89TotyQdUcl4U6oLcap5ft0
 L5A5+Gfws48M8T1g4PT5q0TcxfKPp8XF7Twe6uVJHAxhVlwiBHVmVJhiWiFxf6YO91
 h5hEIFswzpjcUEe0V7+Zg2klvSdtbqHNpN7elwFqVhMZ94paQx3PzSVbPxXGbfwk07
 +D7k0EUDaKWQJs2Le/1opwgGdyJEzUxT49Dgw+/kbpCQSMNL77qxPRM0m/DiVI7wcH
 yy9TjKh3j9ElEFoi+3EXTM7aGrRAq37wOpiZ8rq08Q1DvPrQVVEHzCPNMSoTHTMWvZ
 9ObhXWP1AFV/A==
From: Eshel Yaron <me@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <5aface42-2b80-4612-bf81-0e7992feb90a@HIDDEN>
References: <dd4c510c-26f0-4922-99cd-8bfa32fdd07c@HIDDEN>
 <m14izyiw1l.fsf@HIDDEN> <m1msdlibbw.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <5aface42-2b80-4612-bf81-0e7992feb90a@HIDDEN>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2025 19:14:51 +0100
Message-ID: <m1y0x4vo4k.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

close 76964 30.2
quit

Geza Herman <geza.herman@HIDDEN> writes:

> Hi Eshel,
>
> Thanks, the new version seems to work correctly!

Great, thanks for confirming.

> (Sorry, I was meant to create a patch, for before that I asked a
> question in emacs-devel about the behavior of define-minor-mode, and I
> was waiting for a response - got none so far)

Oh, I missed that message.  Indeed, if we end up changing
define-minor-mode then we'll be able remove this check in
completion-preview--post-command.  For now, I'm closing this bug.


Thanks again,

Eshel




Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Mar 2025 18:14:58 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 16 14:14:58 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50658 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1ttsVl-0002fi-RI
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2025 14:14:58 -0400
Received: from mail.eshelyaron.com ([107.175.124.16]:52542 helo=eshelyaron.com)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <me@HIDDEN>)
 id 1ttsVi-0002fT-Cf; Sun, 16 Mar 2025 14:14:54 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eshelyaron.com;
 s=mail; t=1742148893;
 bh=s+9nBhanIEy3jb8T+BmSNOyaWnPblKFphaE8UZbIXBA=;
 h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From;
 b=aM+xh+iri5gFPwYLz06JHmLkmvg4mXddMHGsUTnbVO89TotyQdUcl4U6oLcap5ft0
 L5A5+Gfws48M8T1g4PT5q0TcxfKPp8XF7Twe6uVJHAxhVlwiBHVmVJhiWiFxf6YO91
 h5hEIFswzpjcUEe0V7+Zg2klvSdtbqHNpN7elwFqVhMZ94paQx3PzSVbPxXGbfwk07
 +D7k0EUDaKWQJs2Le/1opwgGdyJEzUxT49Dgw+/kbpCQSMNL77qxPRM0m/DiVI7wcH
 yy9TjKh3j9ElEFoi+3EXTM7aGrRAq37wOpiZ8rq08Q1DvPrQVVEHzCPNMSoTHTMWvZ
 9ObhXWP1AFV/A==
From: Eshel Yaron <me@HIDDEN>
To: Geza Herman <geza.herman@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#76964: 31.0.50; completion-preview-mode uses a lot of CPU
In-Reply-To: <5aface42-2b80-4612-bf81-0e7992feb90a@HIDDEN>
References: <dd4c510c-26f0-4922-99cd-8bfa32fdd07c@HIDDEN>
 <m14izyiw1l.fsf@HIDDEN> <m1msdlibbw.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <5aface42-2b80-4612-bf81-0e7992feb90a@HIDDEN>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2025 19:14:51 +0100
Message-ID: <m1y0x4vo4k.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
Cc: 76964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

close 76964 30.2
quit

Geza Herman <geza.herman@HIDDEN> writes:

> Hi Eshel,
>
> Thanks, the new version seems to work correctly!

Great, thanks for confirming.

> (Sorry, I was meant to create a patch, for before that I asked a
> question in emacs-devel about the behavior of define-minor-mode, and I
> was waiting for a response - got none so far)

Oh, I missed that message.  Indeed, if we end up changing
define-minor-mode then we'll be able remove this check in
completion-preview--post-command.  For now, I'm closing this bug.


Thanks again,

Eshel





Last modified: Sun, 16 Mar 2025 18:30:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.