GNU bug report logs - #77113
[PATCH] Use default print settings in nnfeed--write-server

Previous Next

To reply to this bug, email your comments to 77113 AT debbugs.gnu.org.
There is no need to reopen the bug first.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: James Thomas <jimjoe <at> gmx.net>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] Use default print settings in nnfeed--write-server
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 15:49:06 +0530

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

I suppose it'd be possible to construct an adversarial example that
would cause the current code to fail, but this should be
uncontroversial. I've had occassional problems that it seems to fix.

Ref:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnus-english/2025-03/msg00020.html

[0001-lisp-gnus-nnfeed-el--nnfeed--write-server.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

--

Message #8 received at 77113 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: James Thomas <jimjoe <at> gmx.net>, daniel <at> dsemy.com
Cc: 77113 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#77113: [PATCH] Use default print settings in
 nnfeed--write-server
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2025 11:27:51 +0300

> Cc: daniel <at> dsemy.com
> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 15:49:06 +0530
> From:  James Thomas via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
>  the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
> 
> I suppose it'd be possible to construct an adversarial example that
> would cause the current code to fail, but this should be
> uncontroversial. I've had occassional problems that it seems to fix.
> 
> Ref:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnus-english/2025-03/msg00020.html

Daniel, any comments?

> From 0334c958c73790264938c579c35b8124856f7287 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: James Thomas <jimjoe <at> gmx.net>
> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 15:54:31 +0530
> Subject: [PATCH] * lisp/gnus/nnfeed.el (nnfeed--write-server):
> 
> Use default print settings.
> ---
>  lisp/gnus/nnfeed.el | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lisp/gnus/nnfeed.el b/lisp/gnus/nnfeed.el
> index ffea063038e..f6cca1e5d76 100644
> --- a/lisp/gnus/nnfeed.el
> +++ b/lisp/gnus/nnfeed.el
> @@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ nnfeed--write-server
>                 ((hash-table-p s)))
>            (with-temp-file f
>              (insert ";;;; -*- mode: lisp-data -*- DO NOT EDIT\n")
> -            (prin1 s (current-buffer))
> +            (prin1 s (current-buffer) t)
>              (insert "\n")
>              t)
>          t)
> --
> 2.46.0

Message #11 received at 77113 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Daniel Semyonov <daniel <at> dsemy.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 77113 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, James Thomas <jimjoe <at> gmx.net>
Subject: Re: bug#77113: [PATCH] Use default print settings in
 nnfeed--write-server
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2025 12:00:57 +0300

>>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes:

    >> Cc: daniel <at> dsemy.com
    >> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 15:49:06 +0530
    >> From:  James Thomas via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
    >> the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
    >> 
    >> I suppose it'd be possible to construct an adversarial example that
    >> would cause the current code to fail, but this should be
    >> uncontroversial. I've had occassional problems that it seems to fix.
    >> 
    >> Ref:
    >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnus-english/2025-03/msg00020.html

    > Daniel, any comments?

Yes, this should be applied.
Sorry I thought I already replied to this, but I replied on the Gnus
mailing list.

Daniel

Message #16 received at 77113-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Daniel Semyonov <daniel <at> dsemy.com>
Cc: 77113-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, jimjoe <at> gmx.net
Subject: Re: bug#77113: [PATCH] Use default print settings in
 nnfeed--write-server
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2025 13:36:52 +0300

> From: Daniel Semyonov <daniel <at> dsemy.com>
> Cc: James Thomas <jimjoe <at> gmx.net>,  77113 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2025 12:00:57 +0300
> 
> >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes:
> 
>     >> Cc: daniel <at> dsemy.com
>     >> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 15:49:06 +0530
>     >> From:  James Thomas via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
>     >> the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
>     >> 
>     >> I suppose it'd be possible to construct an adversarial example that
>     >> would cause the current code to fail, but this should be
>     >> uncontroversial. I've had occassional problems that it seems to fix.
>     >> 
>     >> Ref:
>     >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnus-english/2025-03/msg00020.html
> 
>     > Daniel, any comments?
> 
> Yes, this should be applied.
> Sorry I thought I already replied to this, but I replied on the Gnus
> mailing list.

Thanks, done, and closing the bug.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.