GNU bug report logs -
#77113
[PATCH] Use default print settings in nnfeed--write-server
Previous Next
Reported by: James Thomas <jimjoe <at> gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 10:20:04 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 77113 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 77113 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
daniel <at> dsemy.com, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#77113
; Package
emacs
.
(Wed, 19 Mar 2025 10:20:05 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
James Thomas <jimjoe <at> gmx.net>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
daniel <at> dsemy.com, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Wed, 19 Mar 2025 10:20:05 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
I suppose it'd be possible to construct an adversarial example that
would cause the current code to fail, but this should be
uncontroversial. I've had occassional problems that it seems to fix.
Ref:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnus-english/2025-03/msg00020.html
[0001-lisp-gnus-nnfeed-el--nnfeed--write-server.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
--
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#77113
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 05 Apr 2025 08:29:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 77113 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Cc: daniel <at> dsemy.com
> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 15:49:06 +0530
> From: James Thomas via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
> the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
>
> I suppose it'd be possible to construct an adversarial example that
> would cause the current code to fail, but this should be
> uncontroversial. I've had occassional problems that it seems to fix.
>
> Ref:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnus-english/2025-03/msg00020.html
Daniel, any comments?
> From 0334c958c73790264938c579c35b8124856f7287 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: James Thomas <jimjoe <at> gmx.net>
> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 15:54:31 +0530
> Subject: [PATCH] * lisp/gnus/nnfeed.el (nnfeed--write-server):
>
> Use default print settings.
> ---
> lisp/gnus/nnfeed.el | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lisp/gnus/nnfeed.el b/lisp/gnus/nnfeed.el
> index ffea063038e..f6cca1e5d76 100644
> --- a/lisp/gnus/nnfeed.el
> +++ b/lisp/gnus/nnfeed.el
> @@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ nnfeed--write-server
> ((hash-table-p s)))
> (with-temp-file f
> (insert ";;;; -*- mode: lisp-data -*- DO NOT EDIT\n")
> - (prin1 s (current-buffer))
> + (prin1 s (current-buffer) t)
> (insert "\n")
> t)
> t)
> --
> 2.46.0
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#77113
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 05 Apr 2025 09:04:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 77113 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
>>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes:
>> Cc: daniel <at> dsemy.com
>> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 15:49:06 +0530
>> From: James Thomas via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
>> the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
>>
>> I suppose it'd be possible to construct an adversarial example that
>> would cause the current code to fail, but this should be
>> uncontroversial. I've had occassional problems that it seems to fix.
>>
>> Ref:
>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnus-english/2025-03/msg00020.html
> Daniel, any comments?
Yes, this should be applied.
Sorry I thought I already replied to this, but I replied on the Gnus
mailing list.
Daniel
Reply sent
to
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Sat, 05 Apr 2025 10:38:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
James Thomas <jimjoe <at> gmx.net>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Sat, 05 Apr 2025 10:38:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #16 received at 77113-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Daniel Semyonov <daniel <at> dsemy.com>
> Cc: James Thomas <jimjoe <at> gmx.net>, 77113 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2025 12:00:57 +0300
>
> >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes:
>
> >> Cc: daniel <at> dsemy.com
> >> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 15:49:06 +0530
> >> From: James Thomas via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
> >> the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
> >>
> >> I suppose it'd be possible to construct an adversarial example that
> >> would cause the current code to fail, but this should be
> >> uncontroversial. I've had occassional problems that it seems to fix.
> >>
> >> Ref:
> >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnus-english/2025-03/msg00020.html
>
> > Daniel, any comments?
>
> Yes, this should be applied.
> Sorry I thought I already replied to this, but I replied on the Gnus
> mailing list.
Thanks, done, and closing the bug.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sat, 03 May 2025 11:24:07 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified today.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.