GNU bug report logs - #77164
[PATCH] doc: SUFFIXES example typo.

Previous Next

Package: automake;

Reported by: Nikolaos Chatzikonstantinou <nchatz314 <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 06:38:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org>

To reply to this bug, email your comments to 77164 AT debbugs.gnu.org.
There is no need to reopen the bug first.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-automake <at> gnu.org:
bug#77164; Package automake. (Sat, 22 Mar 2025 06:38:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Nikolaos Chatzikonstantinou <nchatz314 <at> gmail.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-automake <at> gnu.org. (Sat, 22 Mar 2025 06:38:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Nikolaos Chatzikonstantinou <nchatz314 <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-automake <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] doc: SUFFIXES example typo.
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 02:37:05 -0400
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello list,

See attachment for the patch; it's a trivial typo fix.

Regards,
Nikolaos Chatzikonstantinou
[0001-doc-SUFFIXES-example-typo.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

Information forwarded to bug-automake <at> gnu.org:
bug#77164; Package automake. (Sat, 22 Mar 2025 06:44:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 77164 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Nikolaos Chatzikonstantinou <nchatz314 <at> gmail.com>
To: 77164 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Wrong patch
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 02:43:09 -0400
Oops, my patch is incorrect. Please ignore it.

Regards,
Nikolaos Chatzikonstantinou




Reply sent to Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org>:
You have taken responsibility. (Sat, 22 Mar 2025 21:06:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Nikolaos Chatzikonstantinou <nchatz314 <at> gmail.com>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Sat, 22 Mar 2025 21:06:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #13 received at 77164-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org>
To: nchatz314 <at> gmail.com
Cc: 77164 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#77164: [PATCH] doc: SUFFIXES example typo.
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 15:05:55 -0600
Hi Nikolaos - thanks for the submission and the reversion :).  I find
the existing text (and the companion suffix7.sh test) quite confusing,
but it does seem to be written as intended. So, closing.

Regarding the question you sent me separately, about still looking for
maintainers: most definitely. My time available for Automake is quite
limited. The link I put on https://www.gnu.org/software/automake/ 
to https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake/2021-03/msg00018.html
is still valid, despite being four years old.

Thanks,
Karl




Information forwarded to bug-automake <at> gnu.org:
bug#77164; Package automake. (Sat, 22 Mar 2025 21:06:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Information forwarded to bug-automake <at> gnu.org:
bug#77164; Package automake. (Sun, 23 Mar 2025 03:20:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #19 received at 77164 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Nikolaos Chatzikonstantinou <nchatz314 <at> gmail.com>
To: Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org>
Cc: 77164 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#77164: [PATCH] doc: SUFFIXES example typo.
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 23:19:24 -0400
On Sat, Mar 22, 2025 at 5:05 PM Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Nikolaos - thanks for the submission and the reversion :).  I find
> the existing text (and the companion suffix7.sh test) quite confusing,
> but it does seem to be written as intended. So, closing.
>
> Regarding the question you sent me separately, about still looking for
> maintainers: most definitely. My time available for Automake is quite
> limited. The link I put on https://www.gnu.org/software/automake/
> to https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake/2021-03/msg00018.html
> is still valid, despite being four years old.


Great, my plan is to attempt to add better support for the Guile
programming language to automake, so I will have to study it a decent
amount. Maybe I can offer a hand afterwards.

Regards,
Nikolaos Chatzikonstantinou




This bug report was last modified 12 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.