Ludovic Courtès <ludo@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
Full text available.Ludovic Courtès <ludo@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Apr 2025 12:19:05 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat Apr 05 08:19:05 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41851 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1u12UK-0001Xv-DL for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Apr 2025 08:19:05 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:53634) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <keinflue@HIDDEN>) id 1u102A-00087v-J0 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Apr 2025 05:41:51 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <keinflue@HIDDEN>) id 1u1022-00030p-8H for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Sat, 05 Apr 2025 05:41:42 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <keinflue@HIDDEN>) id 1u101z-0003JH-Td for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Sat, 05 Apr 2025 05:41:41 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E8EB240104 for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Sat, 5 Apr 2025 11:41:37 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1743846097; bh=OpYyQLLyyOmVpaOF7jfb7wSlOgmPIoGbNH7W0wOMTn4=; h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:From; b=ez2UfJle1Oun1R0/15hHwCzBMjVcNzR5S4ZsLvnVFanoVP+5tnKJIqHpCDydbc50S N6hqX3OIMkfaQvDisLS5Ob0JOhmxkV+Pqfsy8hAM2IVeeHtmibkqFz2GeBSUj2U+nD N6DiP0cOfaWvqrMSiJbkF0o/j8LQL73gI1eFkuDlFj0ukjzTNEly+ovBS7CQFNHvcM f1EyZ7im6RBGifLT+7H67pzPaeJ5ROwS0+s9MfzzLasvgsuy0OVz6P1yRI0cGtbZAk k85+HC1fnSuW7Vp1kcyYwAeCEK5bHYs5zfRNdGrrqLBvW3X3nAyIBqzLAIKfsgmSJY tE+SbNcv4l4Wg== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4ZV9Ts0wq9z6tsb; Sat, 5 Apr 2025 11:41:37 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2025 09:41:37 +0000 From: keinflue <keinflue@HIDDEN> To: bug-guix@HIDDEN Subject: multiple packages fail check phases due to read-only file system root Message-ID: <d2849babbc08d92e7ae54b3ccbc609fb@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=keinflue@HIDDEN; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 05 Apr 2025 08:19:03 -0400 Cc: Ludo <ludo@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Hi everyone, probably since commit 40f69b586a several packages including shepherd, go (bootstrap), ruby and scons fail their check phases. They all fail with EROFS "read-only file system" errors. The pattern seems to be that these packages attempt to remove non-existent files under /, e.g. /does-not-exist for the pid-file.sh test case in shepherd. They expect the unlink/unlinkat syscall to fail with ENOENT, but the linux kernel produces EROFS if the file system is read-only, even if the file doesn't exist, and glibc does not modify this behavior for the C library functions. On one hand this is probably not POSIX-conforming behavior of linux/glibc and there was a patch rectifying this in version 3.2 (commit e6bc45d65d) of the kernel, but that regressed with 3.6 (commit c30dabfe5d) from what I can tell. On the the other hand, I do not think that attempting to delete arbitrary files on the file system root with the assumption that it will fail in specific ways is a good idea either and that the files do not actually exist is not a good idea either. Not sure what the correct approach to fixing this would be.
keinflue <keinflue@HIDDEN>
:bug-guix@HIDDEN
.
Full text available.bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#77548
; Package guix
.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.