GNU bug report logs - #77626
31.0.50; Obsoleting, or possibly just deleting, vc-dav.el

Previous Next

To reply to this bug, email your comments to 77626 AT debbugs.gnu.org.
There is no need to reopen the bug first.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Sean Whitton <spwhitton <at> spwhitton.name>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 31.0.50; Obsoleting, or possibly just deleting, vc-dav.el
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2025 11:59:05 +0800

X-debbugs-cc: wmperry <at> gnu.org

vc-dav.el was installed unfinished in 2004 and no substantive work has
been done on it since.  I would like to just delete it, given that there
is no indication it ever actually worked, but we could also mark it as
obsolete, instead.

-- 
Sean Whitton

Message #8 received at 77626 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Sean Whitton <spwhitton <at> spwhitton.name>
Cc: wmperry <at> gnu.org, 77626 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#77626: 31.0.50;
 Obsoleting, or possibly just deleting, vc-dav.el
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2025 14:12:07 +0300

> Cc: wmperry <at> gnu.org
> From: Sean Whitton <spwhitton <at> spwhitton.name>
> Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2025 11:59:05 +0800
> 
> X-debbugs-cc: wmperry <at> gnu.org
> 
> vc-dav.el was installed unfinished in 2004 and no substantive work has
> been done on it since.  I would like to just delete it, given that there
> is no indication it ever actually worked, but we could also mark it as
> obsolete, instead.

We never delete anything without moving it to obsolete first.  I don't
see a reason to risk someone's breakage even in this case, since the
file as it is doesn't really do any harm if we move it to obsolete.

Message #11 received at 77626 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Sean Whitton <spwhitton <at> spwhitton.name>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: wmperry <at> gnu.org, 77626 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#77626: 31.0.50; Obsoleting, or possibly just deleting,
 vc-dav.el
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2025 10:32:43 +0800

Hello,

On Tue 08 Apr 2025 at 02:12pm +03, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

>> Cc: wmperry <at> gnu.org
>> From: Sean Whitton <spwhitton <at> spwhitton.name>
>> Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2025 11:59:05 +0800
>>
>> X-debbugs-cc: wmperry <at> gnu.org
>>
>> vc-dav.el was installed unfinished in 2004 and no substantive work has
>> been done on it since.  I would like to just delete it, given that there
>> is no indication it ever actually worked, but we could also mark it as
>> obsolete, instead.
>
> We never delete anything without moving it to obsolete first.  I don't
> see a reason to risk someone's breakage even in this case, since the
> file as it is doesn't really do any harm if we move it to obsolete.

Cool, I'll give it some time and then do that, then.

-- 
Sean Whitton

Message #16 received at 77626-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Sean Whitton <spwhitton <at> spwhitton.name>
To: 77626-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#77626: 31.0.50; Obsoleting, or possibly just deleting,
 vc-dav.el
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2025 12:31:34 +0800

Version: 31.1

Hello,

Marked as obsolete.

-- 
Sean Whitton

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.