GNU bug report logs - #78040
elogind's suspend-then-hibernate requires dmi-sysfs to detect wakeup type

Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.

Package: guix; Reported by: Josselin Poiret <dev@HIDDEN>; dated Thu, 24 Apr 2025 14:57:02 UTC; Maintainer for guix is bug-guix@HIDDEN.

Message received at 78040 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 78040) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Apr 2025 00:01:24 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 24 20:01:24 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42796 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1u86VQ-00021H-Dw
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Apr 2025 20:01:24 -0400
Received: from dwarf.ash.relay.mailchannels.net ([23.83.222.53]:61365)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <dannym@HIDDEN>)
 id 1u86VN-000215-Am
 for 78040 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Apr 2025 20:01:22 -0400
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|dannym@HIDDEN
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411082C458B;
 Fri, 25 Apr 2025 00:01:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a205.dreamhost.com
 (100-110-58-101.trex-nlb.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.110.58.101])
 (Authenticated sender: dreamhost)
 by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id DC8952C5195;
 Fri, 25 Apr 2025 00:01:18 +0000 (UTC)
ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-2022; d=mailchannels.net; t=1745539278; a=rsa-sha256;
 cv=none;
 b=VV9waHqASraeSK3AzcQoyY29WRRulsUgavWuBFj6v+iQE6G89VaQHdGN7b3FJsSFB9vZ07
 dvEkuq8/6/6BisSHEA8Dhig0w+O25uWkzuJLM+5HZc/blENy907pIb/fs/owhiUv8vL2tz
 YVBwjx/1xTX75gLbnoA4IjkG1h/95mY/chJivRHjPnFWdiQ7ILkYvIJTHEYX66qPL/71su
 PEoK4AdnZ5haqYbNfTRZbE8bHPoS7MUdbNoNj4Oz49g0Z2aHic/WCU6UA7TKHxFq6YUEfO
 GqTgLKdD4gYIpgjKcgxv0a17xEoXrUM30vASj/tYmRWSBFwdWHZG/wtzj4DhAA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=mailchannels.net; s=arc-2022; t=1745539278;
 h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
 dkim-signature; bh=bwGhInJeg1fO+xfwixuCSc3PGPcbuxkQqK8bHhnyAk8=;
 b=P5/sMK0k72WldaZ56lg0AnxNwPIzKll5EMO1CVvWyXYjqbc/v6p4afah6SFlyjMTdXcK5y
 qfuo6DN2gVRi/LiGS3qQzIZ7OwfmDmL0wvoFahW1+GkNtcrbljwsbgGA6lpDoX/Nh99RwP
 GPI6O5gG4FJC53DeYByexmaslbL+LZRtSQn/UZC7ylMUzjDLRfuLKJxvMt/aVu4Mlw9vzD
 gKzoOozC7dwz9LEvLq1UCwpPsEA5HR/+wVvErKFojtx6O7G1FC30DKPdG1R88bNFrMl6A5
 v/UWAhBkF45Rrb04dvP3CNcSOslmWuyj4Y2XYW8vndntYY/Q1ubpC0ItZv+mVA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; rspamd-5cfcf5665-8vngp;
 auth=pass smtp.auth=dreamhost smtp.mailfrom=dannym@HIDDEN
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|dannym@HIDDEN
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|dannym@HIDDEN
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost
X-Exultant-Shoe: 0a61886c00f67c82_1745539279115_2346746836
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1745539279115:3107457045
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1745539279115
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a205.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com
 [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384)
 by 100.110.58.101 (trex/7.0.3); Fri, 25 Apr 2025 00:01:19 +0000
Received: from nova (84-115-226-251.cable.dynamic.surfer.at [84.115.226.251])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest
 SHA256) (No client certificate requested)
 (Authenticated sender: dannym@HIDDEN)
 by pdx1-sub0-mail-a205.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4ZkCg16Ks9zMN; 
 Thu, 24 Apr 2025 17:01:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=friendly-machines.com; s=dreamhost; t=1745539278;
 bh=OmYaPdk5ofCpMsu5yCkVJl0OHExEoKCQVmwAXt9lC64=;
 h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Content-Type;
 b=M6X0bbAMSyw80jsKx13U6Qr0rWc3+o6q8fkBfFf2ttOBfJ+x+pHj3p7dLWyleWiEh
 L2uZThibdlVCoAVDRZrIt2oXyU7qTxKlvlBQwu+R5mLdNdpTlRjYJxSkFXEdIJEpEs
 fyxefby45ZYXNz/jgldgq4DJcYtak3uLM+7IKl/IB/3G0Z9wqFEbmLXEXIIql8UsyF
 wEByK9lfT1wY/H3VdIUkjZetkEIaauE6CS6+oVm1JMTUjuy2eWrIgjwIM7lfzy4hEN
 82FZsZdT8yQsEduvq7+V28rVBaUIRRJhPABQNdwZvNIpahD2QbWAA8oB5vXPe3Vrlv
 TeUXE+/2ghYwg==
From: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@HIDDEN>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#78040: elogind's suspend-then-hibernate requires dmi-sysfs
 to detect wakeup type
User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.9; emacs 29.4
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 02:01:14 +0200
Message-ID: <87y0vp154l.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 3.6 (+++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview:  >> Loading dmi-sysfs manually solves this issue, but I don't
 know how to do >> that with the elogind-service-type implementation. >Maybe
 an activation snippet could do: > (load-linux-modules-from-directory
 '("dmi-sysfs") > (current-kernel-directory)) 
 Content analysis details:   (3.6 points, 10.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE:
 The query to Validity was blocked.  See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243
 for more information.
 [23.83.222.53 listed in sa-accredit.habeas.com]
 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS        RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS
 [84.115.226.251 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 no trust [23.83.222.53 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5      RBL: Excellent reputation (+5)
 [23.83.222.53 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
 0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The
 query to Validity was blocked.  See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243
 for more information.
 [23.83.222.53 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com]
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL      Mailspike good senders
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 78040
Cc: dev@HIDDEN, 78040 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 2.6 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  >> Loading dmi-sysfs manually solves this issue, but I don't
    know how to do >> that with the elogind-service-type implementation. >Maybe
    an activation snippet could do: > (load-linux-modules-from-directory '("dmi-sysfs")
    > (current-kernel-directory)) 
 
 Content analysis details:   (2.6 points, 10.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE:
                             The query to Validity was blocked.  See
                             https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243
                              for more information.
                             [23.83.222.53 listed in sa-accredit.habeas.com]
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
                              no trust
                             [23.83.222.53 listed in list.dnswl.org]
  0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The
                             query to Validity was blocked.  See
                             https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243
                              for more information.
                             [23.83.222.53 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com]
  3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS        RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS
                             [84.115.226.251 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
  0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5      RBL: Excellent reputation (+5)
                             [23.83.222.53 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
  0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL      Mailspike good senders
 -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
                             manager

>> Loading dmi-sysfs manually solves this issue, but I don't know how to do
>> that with the elogind-service-type implementation.

>Maybe an activation snippet could do:
>  (load-linux-modules-from-directory '("dmi-sysfs")
>                                     (current-kernel-directory))

Why not use the kernel module loader service extension?
That's what it's there for.

(service-type
...
   (extensions
    (list (service-extension kernel-module-loader-service-type
                             (const '("dmi-sysfs"))))))




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#78040; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 78040 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 78040) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Apr 2025 21:39:37 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 24 17:39:37 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42176 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1u84IC-0006zH-LB
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Apr 2025 17:39:36 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44802)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1u84I8-0006yO-LK
 for 78040 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Apr 2025 17:39:32 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1u84I3-0004NU-C2; Thu, 24 Apr 2025 17:39:27 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To:
 From; bh=I++uc5FRB5Ly3AOK9rX3nQz2mfRjoHEPg3aply/C5fI=; b=MDhNbE8fx/hoSwqrxB8d
 fq/ok5KV2OuX1yd0/wrWM9KaRwyGb8dbbfgAG74v/n+L2qP9k7XrmvVzP2dNv/tHxem5eV0UKzBY+
 qw7VgBxC2qd+X8V8N/B/LXUjaWeBwPOFQGUwJNwyeck5dmfvoylt4DWqBJ/Vi0pzCz/P5/gOe8O91
 Hvc95vcPcTP7e3L11AP9koc77j2Ve9cbG6d6cbascVpCFmqixcza53v+kIQjdtrB3yuvFxrTE4hCu
 YQXmTTReMr61znDEaQiThDspUfmkmP/4eccJHqLVLZLaZJqcjzIYxttCddHzt3kSby4aOkoWtYCPv
 gtsQPvcw4hBH3A==;
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
To: Josselin Poiret via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#78040: elogind's suspend-then-hibernate requires dmi-sysfs
 to detect wakeup type
In-Reply-To: <87zfg5wqua.fsf@HIDDEN> (Josselin Poiret via Bug reports
 for's message of "Thu, 24 Apr 2025 16:56:29 +0200")
References: <87zfg5wqua.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.9; emacs 29.4
X-URL: https://people.bordeaux.inria.fr/lcourtes/
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4  0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5
X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
X-Revolutionary-Date: Quintidi 5 =?utf-8?Q?Flor=C3=A9al?= an 233 de la
 =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution=2C?= jour du Rossignol
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 22:38:30 +0200
Message-ID: <87v7qti9bt.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 78040
Cc: Josselin Poiret <dev@HIDDEN>, 78040 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Hello Josselin,

Josselin Poiret via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix@HIDDEN> writes:

> The suspend-then-hibernate option of elogind tries to detect the type of
> wakeup that the system supports, and to that end reads
> /sys/firmware/dmi/entries/1-0/raw.  However that file only exists if
> the kernel module dmi-sysfs has been loaded, which doesn't seem to be
> the case by default on my Guix system.
>
> If that doesn't work out, it falls back to a custom implementation that
> wakes up the system periodically to check the battery status, however
> that is also broken for some other reason=E2=84=A2 on my system, leading =
to an
> instant hibernation.

I experienced it too; glad you found the reason!

> Loading dmi-sysfs manually solves this issue, but I don't know how to do
> that with the elogind-service-type implementation.

Maybe an activation snippet could do:

  (load-linux-modules-from-directory '("dmi-sysfs")
                                     (current-kernel-directory))

?

Ludo=E2=80=99.




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#78040; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Apr 2025 21:39:37 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 24 17:39:37 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42178 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1u84ID-0006zL-1O
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Apr 2025 17:39:37 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:38964)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1u84IB-0006yX-3R
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Apr 2025 17:39:35 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1u84I3-00017h-Ks
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Thu, 24 Apr 2025 17:39:27 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1u84I3-0004NU-C2; Thu, 24 Apr 2025 17:39:27 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To:
 From; bh=I++uc5FRB5Ly3AOK9rX3nQz2mfRjoHEPg3aply/C5fI=; b=MDhNbE8fx/hoSwqrxB8d
 fq/ok5KV2OuX1yd0/wrWM9KaRwyGb8dbbfgAG74v/n+L2qP9k7XrmvVzP2dNv/tHxem5eV0UKzBY+
 qw7VgBxC2qd+X8V8N/B/LXUjaWeBwPOFQGUwJNwyeck5dmfvoylt4DWqBJ/Vi0pzCz/P5/gOe8O91
 Hvc95vcPcTP7e3L11AP9koc77j2Ve9cbG6d6cbascVpCFmqixcza53v+kIQjdtrB3yuvFxrTE4hCu
 YQXmTTReMr61znDEaQiThDspUfmkmP/4eccJHqLVLZLaZJqcjzIYxttCddHzt3kSby4aOkoWtYCPv
 gtsQPvcw4hBH3A==;
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
To: Josselin Poiret via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#78040: elogind's suspend-then-hibernate requires dmi-sysfs
 to detect wakeup type
In-Reply-To: <87zfg5wqua.fsf@HIDDEN> (Josselin Poiret via Bug reports
 for's message of "Thu, 24 Apr 2025 16:56:29 +0200")
References: <87zfg5wqua.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.9; emacs 29.4
X-URL: https://people.bordeaux.inria.fr/lcourtes/
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4  0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5
X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
X-Revolutionary-Date: Quintidi 5 =?utf-8?Q?Flor=C3=A9al?= an 233 de la
 =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution=2C?= jour du Rossignol
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 22:38:30 +0200
Message-ID: <87v7qti9bt.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
Cc: Josselin Poiret <dev@HIDDEN>, 78040 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Hello Josselin,

Josselin Poiret via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix@HIDDEN> writes:

> The suspend-then-hibernate option of elogind tries to detect the type of
> wakeup that the system supports, and to that end reads
> /sys/firmware/dmi/entries/1-0/raw.  However that file only exists if
> the kernel module dmi-sysfs has been loaded, which doesn't seem to be
> the case by default on my Guix system.
>
> If that doesn't work out, it falls back to a custom implementation that
> wakes up the system periodically to check the battery status, however
> that is also broken for some other reason=E2=84=A2 on my system, leading =
to an
> instant hibernation.

I experienced it too; glad you found the reason!

> Loading dmi-sysfs manually solves this issue, but I don't know how to do
> that with the elogind-service-type implementation.

Maybe an activation snippet could do:

  (load-linux-modules-from-directory '("dmi-sysfs")
                                     (current-kernel-directory))

?

Ludo=E2=80=99.




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#78040; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Apr 2025 14:56:48 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 24 10:56:48 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40068 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1u7y0O-0003c4-AO
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Apr 2025 10:56:48 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:40396)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <dev@HIDDEN>) id 1u7y0K-0003bn-En
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Apr 2025 10:56:45 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <dev@HIDDEN>) id 1u7y0E-0007ne-AG
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Thu, 24 Apr 2025 10:56:38 -0400
Received: from jpoiret.xyz ([159.223.231.69])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <dev@HIDDEN>) id 1u7y0C-0006Cf-N7
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Thu, 24 Apr 2025 10:56:38 -0400
From: Josselin Poiret <dev@HIDDEN>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jpoiret.xyz; s=dkim;
 t=1745506593;
 h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
 to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type;
 bh=QQEcikyZi1asSelx+FetZseXJVkY2tMxMgsG0FJufs8=;
 b=JtOCVSTnBXlj79UVKDXg0/kRLjyTlnUSPCOH999n2a07tfuyYff24Ej2M/8aPWXGMi3Zir
 +d8CEHl3NO77Zr4JfKGa8Uq1YI6eKIr3wT9w8tTi6RbOqKKj/75IP5qyuqLXjcBR/NLyyi
 ZmxE7yLunFB4guYbJYwETHtxPh/OPGttY7fNhvPRwGHy1c2EG3ENUBwuEnJFYGBWTerr7O
 JdpYX7f5yOkEYpqU3cbcXvezqZwOn9DuSqr25U+4J10kRAahgd69YOEYL3xSr8UIetTwPV
 6uEhC+VlHJQjCzWYcqVdBYEDW4596d7LvRkiJX1bZkdxF8j9XehWL8I7SuMNFA==
Authentication-Results: jpoiret.xyz;
	auth=pass smtp.mailfrom=dev@HIDDEN
To: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Subject: elogind's suspend-then-hibernate requires dmi-sysfs to detect
 wakeup type
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 16:56:29 +0200
Message-ID: <87zfg5wqua.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spamd-Bar: --
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=159.223.231.69; envelope-from=dev@HIDDEN;
 helo=jpoiret.xyz
X-Spam_score_int: 19
X-Spam_score: 1.9
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam_report: (1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD=0.499,
 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP=1.469, PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD=1.998,
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001,
 SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: 4.9 (++++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview:  Hello everyone, The suspend-then-hibernate option of elogind
 tries to detect the type of wakeup that the system supports, and to that
 end reads /sys/firmware/dmi/entries/1-0/raw. However that file only exists
 if the [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (4.9 points, 10.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL           SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail)
 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD      Untrustworthy TLDs
 [URI: jpoiret.xyz (xyz)]
 -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 no trust [2001:470:142:0:0:0:0:17 listed in] [list.dnswl.org]
 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD   From abused NTLD
 1.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP From abused NTLD
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  Hello everyone, The suspend-then-hibernate option of elogind
    tries to detect the type of wakeup that the system supports, and to that
   end reads /sys/firmware/dmi/entries/1-0/raw. However that file only exists
    if the [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (2.5 points, 10.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
                              no trust
                             [2001:470:142:0:0:0:0:17 listed in]
                             [list.dnswl.org]
  1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL           SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail)
  2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD      Untrustworthy TLDs
                             [URI: jpoiret.xyz (xyz)]
 -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
  0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD   From abused NTLD
 -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
                             manager

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello everyone,

The suspend-then-hibernate option of elogind tries to detect the type of
wakeup that the system supports, and to that end reads
/sys/firmware/dmi/entries/1-0/raw.  However that file only exists if
the kernel module dmi-sysfs has been loaded, which doesn't seem to be
the case by default on my Guix system.

If that doesn't work out, it falls back to a custom implementation that
wakes up the system periodically to check the battery status, however
that is also broken for some other reason=E2=84=A2 on my system, leading to=
 an
instant hibernation.

Loading dmi-sysfs manually solves this issue, but I don't know how to do
that with the elogind-service-type implementation.

Best,
=2D-=20
Josselin Poiret

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=qhXB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--




Acknowledgement sent to Josselin Poiret <dev@HIDDEN>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN. Full text available.
Report forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#78040; Package guix. Full text available.
Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.
Last modified: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 00:15:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.