GNU bug report logs -
#78305
[PATCH] Add a new user option to hide the header of old feeds in newsticker
Previous Next
To reply to this bug, email your comments to 78305 AT debbugs.gnu.org.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#78305
; Package
emacs
.
(Wed, 07 May 2025 22:49:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Baptiste Strazzulla <baptiste.strazzulla <at> protonmail.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Wed, 07 May 2025 22:49:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello!
Here is a patch to hide the header of feeds without any new or immortal items in the plainview newsticker buffer. My use-case is that I'm subscribed to a lot of low-key feeds that are not updated often, so most of the time, the visible part of a fresh plainview buffer is just a list of empty feeds. This patch adds a new user option `newsticker-hide-old-feed-header-in-newsticker-buffer` which when set to `true` hides them, only leaving feeds with new items visible.
What do you think?
Regards,
Baptiste Strazzulla
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
[0001-Use-the-already-defined-age-variable.patch (application/octet-stream, attachment)]
[0002-Add-a-new-user-option-to-hide-the-header-of-old-feed.patch (application/octet-stream, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#78305
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 02 Jun 2025 15:50:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Am 07.05.2025 um 22:48 (+0000) schrieb Baptiste Strazzulla via "Bug
reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors":
> What do you think?
I think the patches are OK. We should apply them, I'd say.
I am not sure whether the changes require copyright assignment or they
are "trivial". Besides I am out of practice regarding committing other
people's patches. Can someone help out?
ulf
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#78305
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 02 Jun 2025 15:50:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#78305
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 02 Jun 2025 15:58:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 78305 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
>>>>> On Mon, 02 Jun 2025 17:49:17 +0200, Ulf Jasper via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org> said:
Ulf> Am 07.05.2025 um 22:48 (+0000) schrieb Baptiste Strazzulla via "Bug
Ulf> reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors":
>> What do you think?
Ulf> I think the patches are OK. We should apply them, I'd say.
Ulf> I am not sure whether the changes require copyright assignment or they
Ulf> are "trivial". Besides I am out of practice regarding committing other
Ulf> people's patches. Can someone help out?
I donʼt know about copyright assignment, but could the user option be
something shorter than
`newsticker-hide-old-feed-header-in-newsticker-buffer'? Would
`newsticker-hide-old-feed-header' not be enough?
Robert
--
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#78305
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 02 Jun 2025 16:32:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 78305 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Cc: baptiste.strazzulla <at> protonmail.com
> Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2025 17:49:17 +0200
> From: Ulf Jasper via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
> the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
>
> Am 07.05.2025 um 22:48 (+0000) schrieb Baptiste Strazzulla via "Bug
> reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors":
> > What do you think?
>
> I think the patches are OK. We should apply them, I'd say.
> I am not sure whether the changes require copyright assignment or they
> are "trivial". Besides I am out of practice regarding committing other
> people's patches. Can someone help out?
Accepting this does require copyright assignment.
Baptiste, would you like to start your copyright assignment paperwork
at this time? If yes, i will send you the form to fill and the
instructions to go with it.
Thanks.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#78305
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 02 Jun 2025 20:18:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #20 received at 78305 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Am 02.06.2025 um 17:57 (+0200) schrieb Robert Pluim:
> I donʼt know about copyright assignment, but could the user option be
> something shorter than
> `newsticker-hide-old-feed-header-in-newsticker-buffer'? Would
> `newsticker-hide-old-feed-header' not be enough?
Agree. I think that would be enough.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#78305
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 03 Jun 2025 09:51:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #23 received at 78305 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
> Agree. I think that would be enough.
I updated the second patch.
> Baptiste, would you like to start your copyright assignment paperwork at this time? If yes, i will send you the form to fill and the instructions to go with it.
I started the process the day I sent the patches. There's already been a back and forth of emails the other week. I can ping back here when it's completed.
Cool!
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
[0001-Use-the-already-defined-age-variable.patch (application/octet-stream, attachment)]
[0002-Add-a-new-user-option-to-hide-the-header-of-old-feed.patch (application/octet-stream, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#78305
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 03 Jun 2025 10:18:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #26 received at 78305 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
>>>>> On Tue, 03 Jun 2025 09:50:47 +0000, Baptiste Strazzulla <baptiste.strazzulla <at> protonmail.com> said:
>> Agree. I think that would be enough.
Baptiste> I updated the second patch.
>> Baptiste, would you like to start your copyright assignment
>> paperwork at this time? If yes, i will send you the form to fill and
>> the instructions to go with it.
Baptiste> I started the process the day I sent the patches. There's already been
Baptiste> a back and forth of emails the other week. I can ping back here when
Baptiste> it's completed.
Just two comments:
- can you wrap your ChangeLog entries? See CONTRIBUTE for some Emacs
functionality that can help you with that
- could you put (Bug#78305) somewhere in the commit message, it helps
us with tracking
Thanks
Robert
--
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#78305
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 03 Jun 2025 13:41:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #29 received at 78305 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
> Just two comments:
>
> - can you wrap your ChangeLog entries? See CONTRIBUTE for some Emacs
> functionality that can help you with that
> - could you put (Bug#78305) somewhere in the commit message, it helps
> us with tracking
I filled the ChangeLog entries and added the bug number.
On Tuesday, June 3rd, 2025 at 12:17 PM, Robert Pluim rpluim <at> gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Jun 2025 09:50:47 +0000, Baptiste Strazzulla baptiste.strazzulla <at> protonmail.com said:
>
>>> Agree. I think that would be enough.
>
> Baptiste> I updated the second patch.
>
>>> Baptiste, would you like to start your copyright assignment
>
>>> paperwork at this time? If yes, i will send you the form to fill and
>
>>> the instructions to go with it.
>
> Baptiste> I started the process the day I sent the patches. There's already been
>
> Baptiste> a back and forth of emails the other week. I can ping back here when
>
> Baptiste> it's completed.
>
> Just two comments:
>
> - can you wrap your ChangeLog entries? See CONTRIBUTE for some Emacs
> functionality that can help you with that
> - could you put (Bug#78305) somewhere in the commit message, it helps
> us with tracking
>
> Thanks
>
> Robert
> --
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
[0002-Add-a-new-user-option-to-hide-the-header-of-old-feed.patch (application/octet-stream, attachment)]
[0001-Use-the-already-defined-age-variable.patch (application/octet-stream, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#78305
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 28 Jun 2025 08:52:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #32 received at 78305 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Ping! Ulf, are these patches okay to install?
> Cc: Ulf Jasper <ulf.jasper <at> web.de>, 78305 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2025 13:40:10 +0000
> From: Baptiste Strazzulla via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
> the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
>
> Just two comments:
>
> - can you wrap your ChangeLog entries? See CONTRIBUTE for some Emacs
> functionality that can help you with that
> - could you put (Bug#78305) somewhere in the commit message, it helps
> us with tracking
>
> I filled the ChangeLog entries and added the bug number.
>
> On Tuesday, June 3rd, 2025 at 12:17 PM, Robert Pluim rpluim <at> gmail.com wrote:
>
> On Tue, 03 Jun 2025 09:50:47 +0000, Baptiste Strazzulla baptiste.strazzulla <at> protonmail.com said:
>
> Agree. I think that would be enough.
>
> Baptiste> I updated the second patch.
>
> Baptiste, would you like to start your copyright assignment
>
> paperwork at this time? If yes, i will send you the form to fill and
>
> the instructions to go with it.
>
> Baptiste> I started the process the day I sent the patches. There's already been
>
> Baptiste> a back and forth of emails the other week. I can ping back here when
>
> Baptiste> it's completed.
>
> Just two comments:
>
> - can you wrap your ChangeLog entries? See CONTRIBUTE for some Emacs
> functionality that can help you with that
> - could you put (Bug#78305) somewhere in the commit message, it helps
> us with tracking
>
> Thanks
>
> Robert
> --
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#78305
; Package
emacs
.
(Sun, 29 Jun 2025 17:32:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #35 received at 78305 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Am 28.06.2025 um 11:51 (+0300) schrieb Eli Zaretskii:
> Ping! Ulf, are these patches okay to install?
I am on vacation right now. Will look at the patches in two weeks or
so. Sorry!
This bug report was last modified 12 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.