GNU bug report logs - #78356
Broken system and home containers

Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.

Package: guix; Severity: important; Reported by: Rutherther <rutherther@HIDDEN>; dated Sat, 10 May 2025 16:10:01 UTC; Maintainer for guix is bug-guix@HIDDEN.

Message received at 78356 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 78356) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 May 2025 08:33:42 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 15 04:33:41 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50889 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1uFU26-0005gj-VT
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 May 2025 04:33:41 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56660)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1uFU1m-0005dX-Jn
 for 78356 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 May 2025 04:33:19 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1uFU1h-000480-5L; Thu, 15 May 2025 04:33:13 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To:
 From; bh=sOCxw/3L4klUBAbEfCWcJ3N7xN4oOdij0QBSscIyHlM=; b=cidTG1oYQ7Z5PuSon6vQ
 dJJzQvYuqfjS2b5q0ySmcjNyU8bZ2dGLALTWt7FY5ZPr9k7/+5ibv9yLZlA7Rs/RXeXOvBoSS+QBe
 t33rs8AjB7BiSfhG7cn8npY5VZ4uuStSO34e1zZf9FHgetc8GaRxRb7V1mth9Gy8lLpL2q7yXh209
 g3DgJWhVJE4SKRg/GN7/yVnT/Ts14M8LlYlq6+sY0EGbnxgSOhKh5MxGwVvtYID9OrzQQk43JRrjE
 JMFxtGmDbBmCQIDJFlRPv6L97+TzHKdG0S/sQVeA78iJy6pBNGL7CvAaTEJwdnxZlrvoRe8J8wD0l
 kTxId1Klnv9OAw==;
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#78356: Broken system and home containers
In-Reply-To: <87zffeie64.fsf@HIDDEN> (Maxim Cournoyer's message of "Thu, 15
 May 2025 15:25:07 +0900")
References: <87r00wjvm3.fsf@HIDDEN> <87v7q643bd.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <871psuxk96.fsf@HIDDEN> <87r00u2mdz.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87ecwuazr0.fsf@HIDDEN> <87bjrwv8n0.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87zffeie64.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.9; emacs 29.4
X-URL: https://people.bordeaux.inria.fr/lcourtes/
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4  0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5
X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
X-Revolutionary-Date: Sextidi 26 =?utf-8?Q?Flor=C3=A9al?= an 233 de la
 =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution=2C?= jour du Fusain
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 10:29:08 +0200
Message-ID: <875xi2xoob.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 78356
Cc: Rutherther <rutherther@HIDDEN>, 78356 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Hi Maxim,

Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN> writes:

> Not sure how minimal that is, but I can trigger this in the readymedia
> system test:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> make check-system TESTS=3Dreadymedia
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> It may not fail every time (?).  In the VM, in
> /var/log/readymedia/minidlna.log, we can read:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> 2025-05-15 08:22:27 In gnu/build/linux-container.scm:
> ...skipping...
> 2025-05-15 08:22:27    476:16  3 (_ "/tmp/guix-directory.w1REZ6")
> 2025-05-15 08:22:27      62:6  2 (call-with-clean-exit #<procedure 7fa0ff=
7c2e80 at gnu/b?>)
> 2025-05-15 08:22:27    321:20  1 (_)
> 2025-05-15 08:22:27 In guix/build/syscalls.scm:
> 2025-05-15 08:22:27   1231:10  0 (_ 268566528)
> 2025-05-15 08:22:27=20
> 2025-05-15 08:22:27 guix/build/syscalls.scm:1231:10: In procedure unshare=
: 268566528: Invalid argument
> 2025-05-15 08:22:28 Backtrace:
> 2025-05-15 08:22:28            4 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/4h68sswscz96=
wk47724bfqfrq9n?")
> 2025-05-15 08:22:28 In ice-9/eval.scm:
> 2025-05-15 08:22:28    191:35  3 (_ _)
> 2025-05-15 08:22:28 In gnu/build/linux-container.scm:
> 2025-05-15 08:22:28     368:8  2 (call-with-temporary-directory #<procedu=
re 7fa0ff7df3f0?>)
> 2025-05-15 08:22:28     485:7  1 (_ "/tmp/guix-directory.w1REZ6")
> 2025-05-15 08:22:28 In unknown file:
> 2025-05-15 08:22:28            0 (waitpid #f #<undefined>)
> 2025-05-15 08:22:28=20
> 2025-05-15 08:22:28 ERROR: In procedure waitpid:
> 2025-05-15 08:22:28 Wrong type (expecting exact integer): #f
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> The service uses least-authority-wrapper.

Damnit.  =E2=80=9Cmake check-system TESTS=3Dbitlbee=E2=80=9D pass though (a=
lso using
=E2=80=98least-authority-wrapper=E2=80=99) and I don=E2=80=99t see any sign=
ificant difference
between the two?

Ludo=E2=80=99.




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#78356; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 78356 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 78356) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 May 2025 06:25:22 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 15 02:25:22 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50173 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1uFS1x-00070V-Rn
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 May 2025 02:25:22 -0400
Received: from mail-pj1-x102c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::102c]:50259)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>)
 id 1uFS1u-0006xx-3O
 for 78356 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 May 2025 02:25:19 -0400
Received: by mail-pj1-x102c.google.com with SMTP id
 98e67ed59e1d1-3081f72c271so532451a91.0
 for <78356 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 14 May 2025 23:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1747290311; x=1747895111; darn=debbugs.gnu.org;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date
 :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date
 :message-id:reply-to;
 bh=FsZJDBx8/TmB1H9kGHXDK2FbfWCzSDqjz2I1u5CaboQ=;
 b=Ssn9sKWz1WJxM+jOjIkBIPGRXTk/6A1ssjcLDXMtiYuOl4f1y0OZcW1d1gjTsfLvAn
 Sd9ssJf1L1LhNwIaF4fjLng/O7WKEcKSsTHMNNADuNbi2LPDNU1XBGS3gaQ74Ih6Oj7N
 PL+gGG8LRdBHreM+4qNM39Fvf72QtPyCqz9Hw3RvFZeYaZ58TMaCs890UG7s1nrQVbZO
 AzOgSaeE79AeLWwTTDosk9YKO6zr91mb7ZsHDWI13tRPHHo1Aq8FDDTedglsRylgmISL
 rEMO+X0tDv0CCKqnexiXHv71gp3kCtYM4G3h0BCp322c/ls3W44FBWhHFWqTmn2NiejE
 az5w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1747290311; x=1747895111;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date
 :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from
 :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=FsZJDBx8/TmB1H9kGHXDK2FbfWCzSDqjz2I1u5CaboQ=;
 b=UgBTtXDcb5N02CM309NwSMa2sl4D6Sbc0MulFPkP6phJeeDlVTol0hgUxb62YoZtVf
 V0iqRklP71G4PJ/k8oRsgFOXXycXPJk3ulgGWSF7RcqkomdRfxAhA3yGQSnkWO5oxsEV
 6sqtCCpHhmMjaE+F3BI0hndMruCXfALSneBfGR3baSQAtjTeNeg5vRzhNMJoTb7TB1Q9
 Ya0iWVPvC0/I+ez6PIAI6iaokSVAZV9cCh0OxSKRNveWK/2Wi/EO8Y5GNXy0wbvaSvS5
 fWBgUD77EUoNVTeztpB8gxqByqF3dwNLm0rmG3RnZRgbGVVa9ncGtX1HaU5jFOPw/kt0
 dDLA==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1;
 AJvYcCWyUF7pACiw6WXUtLDuo3Pivlt68nas4zHGZxQKdBEfFlA8Dz3/8iqqGhTOMSA0xJA3JlhdLg==@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyhZ6COkusNWEpij8oazJSvObJ6MFzr2yV9BmjDDoTft4UxtreJ
 fPAWsws5PnJ34ujrgKk7VsdF+/paTiC0Hb19PfXuh600b63yGRqWIap1PSdJ
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncv6WXlzV/KO0JZXfwgsTe8o+NoaXdiBIp2l6dmiQf8PxKrqYaRAdCR0KOvRzCS
 j4tkC5hKEVDECQK425q8fK/J/uyY/wzKjBRwdsecMH0e2DxFKKElLrOK1wRuXSuPt5aWzWIunN1
 MZxEzIoyLMl+xvGyHN2ThN+NUafTVAXN5E9DNu/OZNJ+C6fpZSy8D+Hxf8b2QQlwXoGoy63luCF
 cm3a6YEo+XLNB8nNIQdow7QX2p0wVPid6v/mvo7cOsp0VCcm0/LZoTAIqoffiSj+GGh21Cioz5R
 J9vKLljcPSsCUAR5onOu9ACnGLzsipCJ+PcYvht5p2eerpqetwElopzcIqfj
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEj6qkgWShZQPmLyWkq0nGkP+sth6QgkFuugplzsvYqnO+isWQXsLmvkHanMPb9TbiFlg/FbQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:17c1:b0:2ee:9b09:7d3d with SMTP id
 98e67ed59e1d1-30e51786009mr1990008a91.19.1747290310944; 
 Wed, 14 May 2025 23:25:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from terra ([2405:6586:be0:0:83c8:d31d:2cec:f542])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 98e67ed59e1d1-30e3347fdddsm2710810a91.33.2025.05.14.23.25.09
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Wed, 14 May 2025 23:25:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#78356: Broken system and home containers
In-Reply-To: <87bjrwv8n0.fsf@HIDDEN> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?=
 =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Tue, 13 May 2025 17:21:39 +0200")
References: <87r00wjvm3.fsf@HIDDEN> <87v7q643bd.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <871psuxk96.fsf@HIDDEN> <87r00u2mdz.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87ecwuazr0.fsf@HIDDEN> <87bjrwv8n0.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 15:25:07 +0900
Message-ID: <87zffeie64.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  Hi, Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hi, > > Rutherther skribis:
    > >>> ./target/guix/bin/guix home container -L ./home/modules ./home/home-configuration.scm
    >> guix home: warning: failed to load '(ruther home channels-emacs)': >>
   no [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (2.0 points, 10.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
  2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD      Untrustworthy TLDs
                             [URI: ditigal.xyz (xyz)]
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
                             provider (maxim.cournoyer[at]gmail.com)
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
                              no trust
                             [2607:f8b0:4864:20:0:0:0:102c listed in]
                             [list.dnswl.org]
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 78356
Cc: Rutherther <rutherther@HIDDEN>, 78356 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)

Hi,

Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@HIDDEN> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Rutherther <rutherther@HIDDEN> skribis:
>
>>> ./target/guix/bin/guix home container -L ./home/modules ./home/home-con=
figuration.scm=20
>> guix home: warning: failed to load '(ruther home channels-emacs)':
>> no code for module (ruther home channels-emacs)
>> ruther/home/channels-emacs.scm:1:0: warning: module name (channels) does=
 not match file name 'ruther/home/channels-emacs.scm'
>> hint: File `./home/modules/ruther/home/channels-emacs.scm' should probab=
ly start with:
>>
>>      (define-module (ruther home channels-emacs))
>>
>> guix home: warning: ambiguous package specification `font-ubuntu'
>> guix home: warning: choosing font-ubuntu@HIDDEN from ruther/home/fonts.scm=
:8:2
>> guix home: error: unshare: 268566528: Invalid argument
>
> What=E2=80=99s weird is that this seems to happen even before activation.
>
> I cannot audit the whole thing but apparently something in the config
> tries to connect to the outside:
>
> <x home container -L home/modules home/home-configuration.scm=20=20=20=20=
=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20
> Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at 'https://codeberg.org/guix=
/guix-mirror'...
> guix home: error: failed to load 'home/home-configuration.scm':
> web/client.scm:338:10: In procedure open-socket-for-uri:
> In procedure getaddrinfo: Servname not supported for ai_socktype
>
> Probably use of =E2=80=98current-guix=E2=80=99?
>
> Anyway, do you think you could boil it down to a minimal reproducer?

Not sure how minimal that is, but I can trigger this in the readymedia
system test:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
make check-system TESTS=3Dreadymedia
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

It may not fail every time (?).  In the VM, in
/var/log/readymedia/minidlna.log, we can read:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
2025-05-15 08:22:27 In gnu/build/linux-container.scm:
...skipping...
2025-05-15 08:22:27    476:16  3 (_ "/tmp/guix-directory.w1REZ6")
2025-05-15 08:22:27      62:6  2 (call-with-clean-exit #<procedure 7fa0ff7c=
2e80 at gnu/b?>)
2025-05-15 08:22:27    321:20  1 (_)
2025-05-15 08:22:27 In guix/build/syscalls.scm:
2025-05-15 08:22:27   1231:10  0 (_ 268566528)
2025-05-15 08:22:27=20
2025-05-15 08:22:27 guix/build/syscalls.scm:1231:10: In procedure unshare: =
268566528: Invalid argument
2025-05-15 08:22:28 Backtrace:
2025-05-15 08:22:28            4 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/4h68sswscz96wk=
47724bfqfrq9n?")
2025-05-15 08:22:28 In ice-9/eval.scm:
2025-05-15 08:22:28    191:35  3 (_ _)
2025-05-15 08:22:28 In gnu/build/linux-container.scm:
2025-05-15 08:22:28     368:8  2 (call-with-temporary-directory #<procedure=
 7fa0ff7df3f0?>)
2025-05-15 08:22:28     485:7  1 (_ "/tmp/guix-directory.w1REZ6")
2025-05-15 08:22:28 In unknown file:
2025-05-15 08:22:28            0 (waitpid #f #<undefined>)
2025-05-15 08:22:28=20
2025-05-15 08:22:28 ERROR: In procedure waitpid:
2025-05-15 08:22:28 Wrong type (expecting exact integer): #f
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

The service uses least-authority-wrapper.

--=20
Thanks,
Maxim




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#78356; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 78356 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 78356) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 May 2025 21:51:22 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 13 17:51:22 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35520 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1uExX0-0008G3-4L
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 May 2025 17:51:22 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38126)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1uExWw-0008Fa-Ra
 for 78356 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 May 2025 17:51:19 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1uExWr-0004Ng-7c; Tue, 13 May 2025 17:51:13 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To:
 From; bh=SZNLYRMstqadXbAGWGYvTeZPTk8iACOjWUYd8shVEew=; b=qOGqqADiv8vkEwzICIvz
 fwFav95190SpZD1KcxFlHtPSM6p5QcQpgVu9dyvbeUfyBMDb6V6Z1BMH8/R3iXr/DNzNTJ5cRQzJU
 P3YZnl9Cv9CA71khDKLETmdZJtQpoxinwWL6561mGGLy5uwCTJBiRyf8Sc6IFYL+IqgDZSJkedEPM
 QcKxiNS/Wej66cxulJ1v6CET49tFZVkeaLNuVdfdl0szVj7W9Z5Zxi/G3L+2oGWFmMBo28lIwFWUq
 JGztG7qasWmd6PuR4HEodOx/Eqdj5IqMWfuPQVmV0zWm3TR8EwUP2zcMwtr7MaQNkZpbuvVSMJqAp
 7g5ara21BQzVWQ==;
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
To: Rutherther <rutherther@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#78356: Broken system and home containers
In-Reply-To: <87r00sh0vk.fsf@HIDDEN> (rutherther@HIDDEN's message of
 "Tue, 13 May 2025 19:33:03 +0200")
References: <87r00wjvm3.fsf@HIDDEN> <87v7q643bd.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <871psuxk96.fsf@HIDDEN> <87r00u2mdz.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87ecwuazr0.fsf@HIDDEN> <87bjrwv8n0.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87r00sh0vk.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.9; emacs 29.4
X-URL: https://people.bordeaux.inria.fr/lcourtes/
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4  0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5
X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
X-Revolutionary-Date: Quartidi 24 =?utf-8?Q?Flor=C3=A9al?= an 233 de la
 =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution=2C?= jour de
 la =?utf-8?Q?Val=C3=A9riane?=
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 23:42:03 +0200
Message-ID: <87ikm4428k.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 78356
Cc: 78356 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-)

Hi,

Rutherther <rutherther@HIDDEN> writes:

>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>> <x home container -L home/modules home/home-configuration.scm=20=20=20=
=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20
>> Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at 'https://codeberg.org/gui=
x/guix-mirror'...
>> guix home: error: failed to load 'home/home-configuration.scm':
>> web/client.scm:338:10: In procedure open-socket-for-uri:
>> In procedure getaddrinfo: Servname not supported for ai_socktype
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> So this is after the build? I have added inferiors recently for using
> Emacs 30, that would explain it before build, but after build I am
> clueless why that would happen. Though if it's before build, I am
> surprised you got an error like that, unless you were purposefully in
> environment without network. I added the inferiors just yesterday,
> commit 819ee341ab6bcc9846b099572af185c781b82a1d shouldn't be downloading
> anything.

Yes, I was running it in =E2=80=98guix shell -CW=E2=80=99.

Ludo=E2=80=99.




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#78356; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 78356 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 78356) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 May 2025 17:33:16 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 13 13:33:16 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33089 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1uEtVD-0005Oe-ST
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 May 2025 13:33:16 -0400
Received: from ditigal.xyz ([2a01:4f8:1c1b:6a1c::]:57526 helo=mail.ditigal.xyz)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rutherther@HIDDEN>)
 id 1uEtVA-0005N4-NM
 for 78356 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 May 2025 13:33:13 -0400
Received: by cerebrum (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 58c67b08
 (TLSv1.3:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:256:NO); 
 Tue, 13 May 2025 17:33:05 +0000 (UTC)
From: Rutherther <rutherther@HIDDEN>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#78356: Broken system and home containers
In-Reply-To: <87bjrwv8n0.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <87r00wjvm3.fsf@HIDDEN> <87v7q643bd.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <871psuxk96.fsf@HIDDEN> <87r00u2mdz.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87ecwuazr0.fsf@HIDDEN> <87bjrwv8n0.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 19:33:03 +0200
Message-ID: <87r00sh0vk.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ditigal.xyz;
 i=@ditigal.xyz; q=dns/txt; s=20240917; t=1747157585; h=from : to : cc
 : subject : in-reply-to : references : date : message-id :
 mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : from;
 bh=yzt6Y705sqvyDkNxF0cbI52GlQ7tczQivHdeLqW6P9o=;
 b=PV0Mv4jte9buzpPLcfqx+uywWjrUTZCI1iPp6PcpCm34wauSuIjyjA0w0zoRd/REPf7Wq
 aUhaqKiwDrRq5xgnI/akjgx4woVrCJD62vJWTYOH2FClygCHc4KLCa31Ea2HhuTwYU6j8T/
 +cCDorfp75ZLycFkMhkyxueRNH1gvvg=
X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  Ludovic Courtès <ludo@HIDDEN> writes: > Hi, > > Rutherther
    <rutherther@HIDDEN> skribis: > >>> ./target/guix/bin/guix home container
    -L ./home/modules ./home/home-configuration.scm >> guix home: warning: failed
    to load '(ruther home c [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (2.5 points, 10.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD      Untrustworthy TLDs
                             [URI: ditigal.xyz (xyz)]
  0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
  0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD   From abused NTLD
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 78356
Cc: 78356 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  Ludovic Courtès <ludo@HIDDEN> writes: > Hi, > > Rutherther
    <rutherther@HIDDEN> skribis: > >>> ./target/guix/bin/guix home container
    -L ./home/modules ./home/home-configuration.scm >> guix home: warning: failed
    to load '(ruther home c [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (2.5 points, 10.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD      Untrustworthy TLDs
                             [URI: ditigal.xyz (xyz)]
  0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
  1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD      Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD
  0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD   From abused NTLD
 -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
                             manager

Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@HIDDEN> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Rutherther <rutherther@HIDDEN> skribis:
>
>>> ./target/guix/bin/guix home container -L ./home/modules ./home/home-con=
figuration.scm=20
>> guix home: warning: failed to load '(ruther home channels-emacs)':
>> no code for module (ruther home channels-emacs)
>> ruther/home/channels-emacs.scm:1:0: warning: module name (channels) does=
 not match file name 'ruther/home/channels-emacs.scm'
>> hint: File `./home/modules/ruther/home/channels-emacs.scm' should probab=
ly start with:
>>
>>      (define-module (ruther home channels-emacs))
>>
>> guix home: warning: ambiguous package specification `font-ubuntu'
>> guix home: warning: choosing font-ubuntu@HIDDEN from ruther/home/fonts.scm=
:8:2
>> guix home: error: unshare: 268566528: Invalid argument
>
> What=E2=80=99s weird is that this seems to happen even before activation.
>
> I cannot audit the whole thing but apparently something in the config
> tries to connect to the outside:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> <x home container -L home/modules home/home-configuration.scm=20=20=20=20=
=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20
> Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at 'https://codeberg.org/guix=
/guix-mirror'...
> guix home: error: failed to load 'home/home-configuration.scm':
> web/client.scm:338:10: In procedure open-socket-for-uri:
> In procedure getaddrinfo: Servname not supported for ai_socktype
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

So this is after the build? I have added inferiors recently for using
Emacs 30, that would explain it before build, but after build I am
clueless why that would happen. Though if it's before build, I am
surprised you got an error like that, unless you were purposefully in
environment without network. I added the inferiors just yesterday,
commit 819ee341ab6bcc9846b099572af185c781b82a1d shouldn't be downloading
anything.

>
> Probably use of =E2=80=98current-guix=E2=80=99?
>
> Anyway, do you think you could boil it down to a minimal reproducer?

I will definitely try to, but probably not today, in a few days,
hopefully by the end of the week.

>
> Thanks,
> Ludo=E2=80=99.




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#78356; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 78356 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 78356) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 May 2025 15:22:48 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 13 11:22:48 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60970 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1uErSw-0003yl-O1
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 May 2025 11:22:48 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39998)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1uErSt-0003yT-2s
 for 78356 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 May 2025 11:22:44 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1uErSn-0005pf-Bb; Tue, 13 May 2025 11:22:37 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To:
 From; bh=hA39Mg4Dj2dsre4pqc9RWQ3TqzOyeOa5tSBMZzr68yg=; b=Mh1iU1Qu+CHAkqY2F3Ir
 0rM9adCpDbZR46DgDEPDojCxZgBuuR7k41EehPEl29Oxom/VysDqFWeAdH8nv5LVeJlSREbBUFBCt
 pqhc3/Uo0kC7iQlZbBzEYJ2zXedeE+ZEDCy0h1w7cLUOmpTn38tppRKoijpTb9SbVl3EgMe+pe6sX
 jNtGnePNVTRZ0o5hTgGA3d2i5eiKk1fAabjc5Gtwl46nALl2dv0+J+kF9dJkP7KHUshI6kTTbVsUW
 qjQzjI3dQRdavRJMCWNGCBuHHHMhK4/fBIuG1uCeFwmHvK3aX5ScNVa8pX+5uWukqxfiDNMb1RfWq
 vPje+dMzxtb7Ow==;
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
To: Rutherther <rutherther@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#78356: Broken system and home containers
In-Reply-To: <87ecwuazr0.fsf@HIDDEN> (rutherther@HIDDEN's message of
 "Mon, 12 May 2025 12:29:23 +0200")
References: <87r00wjvm3.fsf@HIDDEN> <87v7q643bd.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <871psuxk96.fsf@HIDDEN> <87r00u2mdz.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87ecwuazr0.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.9; emacs 29.4
X-URL: https://people.bordeaux.inria.fr/lcourtes/
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4  0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5
X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
X-Revolutionary-Date: Quartidi 24 =?utf-8?Q?Flor=C3=A9al?= an 233 de la
 =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution=2C?= jour de
 la =?utf-8?Q?Val=C3=A9riane?=
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 17:21:39 +0200
Message-ID: <87bjrwv8n0.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 78356
Cc: 78356 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-)

Hi,

Rutherther <rutherther@HIDDEN> skribis:

>> ./target/guix/bin/guix home container -L ./home/modules ./home/home-conf=
iguration.scm=20
> guix home: warning: failed to load '(ruther home channels-emacs)':
> no code for module (ruther home channels-emacs)
> ruther/home/channels-emacs.scm:1:0: warning: module name (channels) does =
not match file name 'ruther/home/channels-emacs.scm'
> hint: File `./home/modules/ruther/home/channels-emacs.scm' should probabl=
y start with:
>
>      (define-module (ruther home channels-emacs))
>
> guix home: warning: ambiguous package specification `font-ubuntu'
> guix home: warning: choosing font-ubuntu@HIDDEN from ruther/home/fonts.scm:=
8:2
> guix home: error: unshare: 268566528: Invalid argument

What=E2=80=99s weird is that this seems to happen even before activation.

I cannot audit the whole thing but apparently something in the config
tries to connect to the outside:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
<x home container -L home/modules home/home-configuration.scm=20=20=20=20=
=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20
Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at 'https://codeberg.org/guix/g=
uix-mirror'...
guix home: error: failed to load 'home/home-configuration.scm':
web/client.scm:338:10: In procedure open-socket-for-uri:
In procedure getaddrinfo: Servname not supported for ai_socktype
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Probably use of =E2=80=98current-guix=E2=80=99?

Anyway, do you think you could boil it down to a minimal reproducer?

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#78356; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 78356 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 78356) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 May 2025 12:46:09 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 12 08:46:09 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51227 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1uESXo-0002dc-P6
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2025 08:46:09 -0400
Received: from ditigal.xyz ([2a01:4f8:1c1b:6a1c::]:39052 helo=mail.ditigal.xyz)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rutherther@HIDDEN>)
 id 1uESXi-0002ca-8J
 for 78356 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2025 08:46:03 -0400
Received: by cerebrum (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id a080c6c5
 (TLSv1.3:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:256:NO); 
 Mon, 12 May 2025 12:45:55 +0000 (UTC)
From: Rutherther <rutherther@HIDDEN>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#78356: Broken system and home containers
In-Reply-To: <87v7q643bd.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <87r00wjvm3.fsf@HIDDEN> <87v7q643bd.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 14:45:53 +0200
Message-ID: <877c2matfi.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ditigal.xyz;
 i=@ditigal.xyz; q=dns/txt; s=20240917; t=1747053955; h=from : to : cc
 : subject : in-reply-to : references : date : message-id :
 mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : from;
 bh=50rJTE1T2m0DaQkLiXaAWXeL1N4wOCu8im4dm2tTFl0=;
 b=bUFMUlkgUVxEXjVQc9we1Xs+N6Goa65+aZd4lLqLXpfYjx8glrejbOcdzmMjffvmmYAkW
 b+Y2248IbS2EcQLqFnIsWrLzUx8+cyH8WDbCHqTZAshOLF+sl1696h0XGVTEO6QqrMu2fYv
 Yzro0eQZeNG21SVsFbRu2uPAEwFEK1k=
X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  Ludovic Courtès <ludo@HIDDEN> writes: > Hi, > > Rutherther
    <rutherther@HIDDEN> writes: >> Here are the backtraces: >> guix system:
    > > Fixed in 437bb9ece55f37d4b5a62cafc98c0c3b848a53ce. Confirmed. 
 
 Content analysis details:   (2.5 points, 10.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD      Untrustworthy TLDs
                             [URI: ditigal.xyz (xyz)]
  0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
  0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD   From abused NTLD
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 78356
Cc: 78356 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  Ludovic Courtès <ludo@HIDDEN> writes: > Hi, > > Rutherther
    <rutherther@HIDDEN> writes: >> Here are the backtraces: >> guix system:
    > > Fixed in 437bb9ece55f37d4b5a62cafc98c0c3b848a53ce. Confirmed. 
 
 Content analysis details:   (2.5 points, 10.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD      Untrustworthy TLDs
                             [URI: ditigal.xyz (xyz)]
  0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
  0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD   From abused NTLD
  1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD      Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD
 -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
                             manager

Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@HIDDEN> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Rutherther <rutherther@HIDDEN> writes:
>> Here are the backtraces:
>> guix system:
>
> Fixed in 437bb9ece55f37d4b5a62cafc98c0c3b848a53ce.

Confirmed.




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#78356; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 78356 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 78356) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 May 2025 12:33:02 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 12 08:33:02 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51147 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1uESL7-0001rm-GB
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2025 08:33:02 -0400
Received: from ditigal.xyz ([2a01:4f8:1c1b:6a1c::]:43918 helo=mail.ditigal.xyz)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rutherther@HIDDEN>)
 id 1uESL3-0001r7-1e
 for 78356 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2025 08:32:58 -0400
Received: by cerebrum (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 845cbb2e
 (TLSv1.3:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:256:NO); 
 Mon, 12 May 2025 12:32:49 +0000 (UTC)
From: Rutherther <rutherther@HIDDEN>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#78356: Broken system and home containers
In-Reply-To: <874ixq2gw2.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <87r00wjvm3.fsf@HIDDEN> <87v7q643bd.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <871psuxk96.fsf@HIDDEN> <87r00u2mdz.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87ecwuazr0.fsf@HIDDEN> <874ixq2gw2.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 14:32:47 +0200
Message-ID: <87a57iau1c.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ditigal.xyz;
 i=@ditigal.xyz; q=dns/txt; s=20240917; t=1747053169; h=from : to : cc
 : subject : in-reply-to : references : date : message-id :
 mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : from;
 bh=feSWfzr+yFY808grvdjdc7IfKIKehHqkV2nRb53asaM=;
 b=namaDEI012wEqCnC2CaQilQItMndRB/WaNUcb9ernZ4oO7CV2KAuPMtfbCRQC5ebgyvxU
 O0iddq/8uN7lcHf4gvMi2Bra6T26L6iFDFQfhiH3E6i5e8JX77h+RVhxiVkRxkMRIeDnYBw
 MICfZuGSMawHJQbzJZ0++w+R5cqX9vA=
X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  Ludovic Courtès <ludo@HIDDEN> writes: > Hi, > > Rutherther
    <rutherther@HIDDEN> writes: > >> --8<cut herestart>8--- >> [ruther:~/.setup]
    main(+68/-13)* 15s ± >>> ./target/guix/bin/guix home [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (2.5 points, 10.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD      Untrustworthy TLDs
                             [URI: ditigal.xyz (xyz)]
  0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
  0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD   From abused NTLD
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 78356
Cc: 78356 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  Ludovic Courtès <ludo@HIDDEN> writes: > Hi, > > Rutherther
    <rutherther@HIDDEN> writes: > >> --8<cut herestart>8--- >> [ruther:~/.setup]
    main(+68/-13)* 15s ± >>> ./target/guix/bin/guix home [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (2.5 points, 10.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD      Untrustworthy TLDs
                             [URI: ditigal.xyz (xyz)]
  0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
  0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD   From abused NTLD
  1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD      Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD
 -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
                             manager

Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@HIDDEN> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Rutherther <rutherther@HIDDEN> writes:
>
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>> [ruther:~/.setup] main(+68/-13)* 15s =C2=B1=20
>>> ./target/guix/bin/guix home container -L ./home/modules ./home/home-con=
figuration.scm=20
>> guix home: warning: failed to load '(ruther home channels-emacs)':
>> no code for module (ruther home channels-emacs)
>> ruther/home/channels-emacs.scm:1:0: warning: module name (channels) does=
 not match file name 'ruther/home/channels-emacs.scm'
>> hint: File `./home/modules/ruther/home/channels-emacs.scm' should probab=
ly start with:
>>
>>      (define-module (ruther home channels-emacs))
>>
>> guix home: warning: ambiguous package specification `font-ubuntu'
>> guix home: warning: choosing font-ubuntu@HIDDEN from ruther/home/fonts.scm=
:8:2
>> guix home: error: unshare: 268566528: Invalid argument
>
> Is this from within a container?

No.

>
> Does =E2=80=98guix shell -C coreutils=E2=80=99 work?

Yes, shell containers work fine for me, it was just home and system
where I saw an issue. As I pointed out earlier the home container in
guix source tree works for me. So it's triggered by something in my home
setup.

>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
[ruther:~/doc/projects/git_clones/guix] issue/78308(9)* 130 =C2=B1
> ~/.setup/target/guix/bin/guix home container doc/he-config-bare-bones.scm=
=20
substitute: looking for substitutes on 'https://substitutes.nonguix.org'...=
 100.0%
substitute: looking for substitutes on 'https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org'... 1=
00.0%
substitute: looking for substitutes on 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0%
The following derivations will be built:
  /gnu/store/1d031p7xkmhhcjw4qqs0cwhfh8p004q7-shepherd-timer.scm.drv
  /gnu/store/54csgxblx2i5c8r03ywxpda1wv8blz61-shepherd-transient.scm.drv
  /gnu/store/k8s4j84qrly49hd1adihjcq106hx0a6c-shepherd-log-rotation.scm.drv
  /gnu/store/ni8rlk32hbr7s6gyps0dr0lfy7g9c5dl-shepherd.conf.drv
  /gnu/store/4khnkn4rab0p6vv9h99n9yfmk2lm1jwj-on-first-login.drv
  /gnu/store/6as6qxw72lcr90gml6wk8mjib5rj8j87-files.drv
  /gnu/store/as14p3xl0n3hgxi5lac7w0gdcjilbr2g-provenance.drv
  /gnu/store/dqlgr0jg3kiyzbbc4pmd9vk188sl3kh1-activate.drv
  /gnu/store/nkhmbvy8hkwkafb7fq1f14by0mrnd046-home.drv

building /gnu/store/as14p3xl0n3hgxi5lac7w0gdcjilbr2g-provenance.drv...
building /gnu/store/k8s4j84qrly49hd1adihjcq106hx0a6c-shepherd-log-rotation.=
scm.drv...
building /gnu/store/1d031p7xkmhhcjw4qqs0cwhfh8p004q7-shepherd-timer.scm.drv=
...
building /gnu/store/54csgxblx2i5c8r03ywxpda1wv8blz61-shepherd-transient.scm=
.drv...
building /gnu/store/ni8rlk32hbr7s6gyps0dr0lfy7g9c5dl-shepherd.conf.drv...
building /gnu/store/dqlgr0jg3kiyzbbc4pmd9vk188sl3kh1-activate.drv...
building /gnu/store/6as6qxw72lcr90gml6wk8mjib5rj8j87-files.drv...
building /gnu/store/4khnkn4rab0p6vv9h99n9yfmk2lm1jwj-on-first-login.drv...
building /gnu/store/nkhmbvy8hkwkafb7fq1f14by0mrnd046-home.drv...
WARNING: (guile-user): imported module (guix build utils) overrides core bi=
nding `delete'
WARNING: (guile-user): imported module (guix build utils) overrides core bi=
nding `delete'
Symlinking /home/ruther/.bash_profile -> /gnu/store/gghay5fzpad5w7082nnk6z9=
lj7q00drv-bash_profile... done
Symlinking /home/ruther/.profile -> /gnu/store/vvxqfhlkpi90bgmfh1b03kkwfq7p=
mfkk-shell-profile... done
Symlinking /home/ruther/.bashrc -> /gnu/store/b9ppn0jdrda5h88mw5x35m2jvms8i=
zw6-bashrc... done
Symlinking /home/ruther/.config/test.conf -> /gnu/store/i8wsnvh1q8lbgyf50va=
pfsn2rfj7a2nc-tmp-file.txt... done
Symlinking /home/ruther/.config/fontconfig/fonts.conf -> /gnu/store/mw4clgk=
wj3rvlnfv0gd694aabvamr0sa-fonts.conf... done
Symlinking /home/ruther/.config/shepherd/init.scm -> /gnu/store/ysg5icpanci=
cn1hi2gfd1q3xvmmgb8lf-shepherd.conf... done
 done
Finished updating symlinks.

Comparing /gnu/store/non-existing-generation/profile/share/fonts and
          /gnu/store/84kwxidarhpibps26xyqbdpj5lfk1s37-home/profile/share/fo=
nts... done (same)
Evaluating on-change gexps.

On-change gexps evaluation finished.

This is the Z Shell configuration function for new users,
zsh-newuser-install.
You are seeing this message because you have no zsh startup files
(the files .zshenv, .zprofile, .zshrc, .zlogin in the directory
~).  This function can help you with a few settings that should
make your use of the shell easier.

You can:

(q)  Quit and do nothing.  The function will be run again next time.

(0)  Exit, creating the file ~/.zshrc containing just a comment.
     That will prevent this function being run again.

(1)  Continue to the main menu.

--- Type one of the keys in parentheses --- 0
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#78356; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 78356 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 78356) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 May 2025 11:57:05 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 12 07:57:04 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50942 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1uERmK-0008K0-JH
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2025 07:57:04 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57300)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1uERmI-0008J9-CH
 for 78356 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2025 07:57:02 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1uERmB-0007m7-VJ; Mon, 12 May 2025 07:56:56 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To:
 From; bh=sNY3vJ6fjoNX6iI0Cp6j8iyu3IdjGw/N0NPb2sAa1UA=; b=itYlZIUnzia5J9rH3yW0
 eO8VaxmuaVFUTHlrDDp9P5AkBviWdJXoYHJaeuwzRWmpPwpdQ1BQitiSoeuPkf7kkgSXrxx08VyZO
 ER6zI3fv/ZIQqUrplxcg8aNqwdJxj3KgUhiy6yx4WbpGQLqj7fymET5HiiyQa4Szl75ips1bPs5kQ
 hA8EVQCiqtllv9IWK0L/YFVegWSD6qVt4UOteN/Y+AOhwVnyEM6DHIYlhZyaC3JPCPTOp1bKx9bYg
 Y1ft5gdBJ0AwjBtSKTTAZP0SGmiGaFsPk2VYknPJq+sYOhcQZpGDJy9/GZGMo90g5A55VGEOlKGv8
 Mff1CwQWaPk1kg==;
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
To: Rutherther <rutherther@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#78356: Broken system and home containers
In-Reply-To: <87ecwuazr0.fsf@HIDDEN> (rutherther@HIDDEN's message of
 "Mon, 12 May 2025 12:29:23 +0200")
References: <87r00wjvm3.fsf@HIDDEN> <87v7q643bd.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <871psuxk96.fsf@HIDDEN> <87r00u2mdz.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87ecwuazr0.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.9; emacs 29.4
X-URL: https://people.bordeaux.inria.fr/lcourtes/
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4  0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5
X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
X-Revolutionary-Date: Tridi 23 =?utf-8?Q?Flor=C3=A9al?= an 233 de la
 =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution=2C?= jour de la Bourrache
Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 13:43:57 +0200
Message-ID: <874ixq2gw2.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 78356
Cc: 78356 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-)

Hi,

Rutherther <rutherther@HIDDEN> writes:

> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> [ruther:~/.setup] main(+68/-13)* 15s =C2=B1=20
>> ./target/guix/bin/guix home container -L ./home/modules ./home/home-conf=
iguration.scm=20
> guix home: warning: failed to load '(ruther home channels-emacs)':
> no code for module (ruther home channels-emacs)
> ruther/home/channels-emacs.scm:1:0: warning: module name (channels) does =
not match file name 'ruther/home/channels-emacs.scm'
> hint: File `./home/modules/ruther/home/channels-emacs.scm' should probabl=
y start with:
>
>      (define-module (ruther home channels-emacs))
>
> guix home: warning: ambiguous package specification `font-ubuntu'
> guix home: warning: choosing font-ubuntu@HIDDEN from ruther/home/fonts.scm:=
8:2
> guix home: error: unshare: 268566528: Invalid argument

Is this from within a container?

Does =E2=80=98guix shell -C coreutils=E2=80=99 work?

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#78356; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 78356 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 78356) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 May 2025 10:29:36 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 12 06:29:36 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50545 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1uEQPf-0000g5-Og
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2025 06:29:36 -0400
Received: from ditigal.xyz ([2a01:4f8:1c1b:6a1c::]:46124 helo=mail.ditigal.xyz)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rutherther@HIDDEN>)
 id 1uEQPb-0000fn-Rr
 for 78356 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2025 06:29:33 -0400
Received: by cerebrum (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 9e9125bd
 (TLSv1.3:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:256:NO); 
 Mon, 12 May 2025 10:29:24 +0000 (UTC)
From: Rutherther <rutherther@HIDDEN>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#78356: Broken system and home containers
In-Reply-To: <87r00u2mdz.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <87r00wjvm3.fsf@HIDDEN> <87v7q643bd.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <871psuxk96.fsf@HIDDEN> <87r00u2mdz.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 12:29:23 +0200
Message-ID: <87ecwuazr0.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ditigal.xyz;
 i=@ditigal.xyz; q=dns/txt; s=20240917; t=1747045765; h=from : to : cc
 : subject : in-reply-to : references : date : message-id :
 mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : from;
 bh=G41h4/bhRPsexN1M4VRcQr7TBqtOD8y34LsPKMLlp88=;
 b=b/MObTnFD9UNUj77V2Ss2gZa5h+RDlL2fUB+sEuAdj6haHOBIWgRVeVUqAMTe8Ct/2dmv
 TMnxSRZxI+qZ4BVIaX7RCrWQ3aUmIgrRtyyogKF76QvHfzgjE4loVGq5N5sOCpfUofW43gA
 3wsHz0UsWaC7oOwI5+PykjM/pZB0wNs=
X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  Ludovic Courtès <ludo@HIDDEN> writes: > Hi, > > Rutherther
    <rutherther@HIDDEN> writes: > >> The command was `guix home container
    -L ./home/modules ./home/home-container.scm` >> in my repository. It's here
    https://git.ditigal.xyz/~rut [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (2.5 points, 10.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD      Untrustworthy TLDs
                             [URI: ditigal.xyz (xyz)]
  0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
  0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD   From abused NTLD
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 78356
Cc: 78356 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  Ludovic Courtès <ludo@HIDDEN> writes: > Hi, > > Rutherther
    <rutherther@HIDDEN> writes: > >> The command was `guix home container
    -L ./home/modules ./home/home-container.scm` >> in my repository. It's here
    https://git.ditigal.xyz/~rut [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (2.5 points, 10.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD      Untrustworthy TLDs
                             [URI: ditigal.xyz (xyz)]
  0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
  0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD   From abused NTLD
  1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD      Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD
 -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
                             manager

Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@HIDDEN> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Rutherther <rutherther@HIDDEN> writes:
>
>> The command was `guix home container -L ./home/modules ./home/home-conta=
iner.scm`
>> in my repository. It's here https://git.ditigal.xyz/~ruther/guix-config.
>> Any idea what service could cause this behavior with lock-mounts? Would
>> be good to isolate it, but I am not sure where to start.
>>
>> Here is the unshare error I was talking about earlier:
>>> guix home: error: unshare: 268566528: Invalid argument
>> Now I am getting it consistently, before it was missing sometimes.
>
> Could you copy paste the command and its output, to be sure there=E2=80=
=99s no
> misunderstanding?

Sure

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
[ruther:~/.setup] main(+68/-13)* 15s =C2=B1=20
> ./target/guix/bin/guix home container -L ./home/modules ./home/home-confi=
guration.scm=20
guix home: warning: failed to load '(ruther home channels-emacs)':
no code for module (ruther home channels-emacs)
ruther/home/channels-emacs.scm:1:0: warning: module name (channels) does no=
t match file name 'ruther/home/channels-emacs.scm'
hint: File `./home/modules/ruther/home/channels-emacs.scm' should probably =
start with:

     (define-module (ruther home channels-emacs))

guix home: warning: ambiguous package specification `font-ubuntu'
guix home: warning: choosing font-ubuntu@HIDDEN from ruther/home/fonts.scm:8:2
guix home: error: unshare: 268566528: Invalid argument
Backtrace:
          18 (primitive-load "/home/ruther/.setup/./target/guix/bin/=E2=80=
=A6")
In guix/ui.scm:
   2369:7 17 (run-guix . _)
  2332:10 16 (run-guix-command _ . _)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
  1752:10 15 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _)
In guix/status.scm:
    859:3 14 (_)
    839:4 13 (call-with-status-report _ _)
In guix/scripts/home.scm:
    547:4 12 (_)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
  1752:10 11 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _)
In guix/store.scm:
   690:37 10 (thunk)
   1331:8  9 (call-with-build-handler _ _)
   1331:8  8 (call-with-build-handler _ _)
   1331:8  7 (call-with-build-handler #<procedure 7fa85bf53930 at g=E2=80=
=A6> =E2=80=A6)
  2212:25  6 (run-with-store #<store-connection 256.100 7fa85cec65a0> =E2=
=80=A6)
In guix/scripts/home.scm:
   465:14  5 (_ _)
In gnu/system/linux-container.scm:
   349:17  4 (_ _)
In gnu/build/linux-container.scm:
    485:7  3 (call-with-container _ _ #:namespaces _ #:host-uids _ # =E2=80=
=A6)
In unknown file:
           2 (waitpid #f #<undefined>)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
  1685:16  1 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
  1685:16  0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)

ice-9/boot-9.scm:1685:16: In procedure raise-exception:
Wrong type (expecting exact integer): #f
=CE=B861=C2=B0 [ruther:~/.setup] main(+68/-13)* 58s 1 =C2=B1=20
> ./target/guix/bin/guix describe=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=
=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=
=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20
  guix 300d29e
    repository URL: https://codeberg.org/guix/guix-mirror
    branch: master
    commit: 300d29e69988caf23684f08effa51f621c7ec083
  nonguix 1940698
    repository URL: https://gitlab.com/nonguix/nonguix
    branch: master
    commit: 19406981a9bf9d0b140180f1f3008cb91f716b4b
  ruther 1a49e47
    repository URL: https://git.ditigal.xyz/~ruther/guix-exprs
    branch: main
    commit: 1a49e4760bd922237532fa2eee44bc9e1fe42399
  rde bf8f628
    repository URL: https://git.sr.ht/~abcdw/rde
    branch: master
    commit: bf8f628c4deb9acc94e261db80d301048ea1f0a2
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

>
> This is on Guix System, right?

Yes

>
> Thanks,
> Ludo=E2=80=99.




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#78356; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 78356 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 78356) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 May 2025 09:54:06 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 12 05:54:06 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50324 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1uEPrK-0007BA-3R
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2025 05:54:06 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55214)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1uEPrG-0007AM-3u
 for 78356 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2025 05:54:04 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1uEPrA-0000j3-9J; Mon, 12 May 2025 05:53:56 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To:
 From; bh=jcznZU4ZI51rZqodMXdS94EVx4O1J3zUJV0sth4Ppho=; b=oWOtkoeE6O32Wcofs+5r
 bddSXVlU+zkJErn1nUcTcIfuNU1WHavJ0wpzM4N4IbjsNLCzcbJ1PSgoQiQzO/Yoxz/XPXbjL/ICX
 ZIsWyagY67E+nWyI3rL4FhIFFrYv0wWVoVKXyVvsIPZBuxMzTzO6/yDanYKCO49Fq3RcMN+MCl/Ac
 SrM3VNpDo8rY8LBQNl4RWrElytlN/m4SjUNyDR0okiIpmty+6PITUvOUrr+NerqKntXLz1oQLRNoU
 h77Nt+1uU4bTk29S8HrapM3Ej7U/5xmpyCbNw4KRB91u3zWkU5e4Q0vKCAqpB93Bvmlw76haULreR
 xUDaR/vmypLBZg==;
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
To: Rutherther <rutherther@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#78356: Broken system and home containers
In-Reply-To: <871psuxk96.fsf@HIDDEN> (rutherther@HIDDEN's message of
 "Mon, 12 May 2025 11:15:33 +0200")
References: <87r00wjvm3.fsf@HIDDEN> <87v7q643bd.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <871psuxk96.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.9; emacs 29.4
X-URL: https://people.bordeaux.inria.fr/lcourtes/
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4  0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5
X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
X-Revolutionary-Date: Tridi 23 =?utf-8?Q?Flor=C3=A9al?= an 233 de la
 =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution=2C?= jour de la Bourrache
Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 11:45:12 +0200
Message-ID: <87r00u2mdz.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 78356
Cc: 78356 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-)

Hi,

Rutherther <rutherther@HIDDEN> writes:

> The command was `guix home container -L ./home/modules ./home/home-contai=
ner.scm`
> in my repository. It's here https://git.ditigal.xyz/~ruther/guix-config.
> Any idea what service could cause this behavior with lock-mounts? Would
> be good to isolate it, but I am not sure where to start.
>
> Here is the unshare error I was talking about earlier:
>> guix home: error: unshare: 268566528: Invalid argument
> Now I am getting it consistently, before it was missing sometimes.

Could you copy paste the command and its output, to be sure there=E2=80=99s=
 no
misunderstanding?

This is on Guix System, right?

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#78356; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 78356 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 78356) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 May 2025 09:15:52 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 12 05:15:52 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50159 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1uEPGJ-00058n-Eo
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2025 05:15:51 -0400
Received: from ditigal.xyz ([2a01:4f8:1c1b:6a1c::]:52766 helo=mail.ditigal.xyz)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rutherther@HIDDEN>)
 id 1uEPGB-00058G-Sv
 for 78356 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2025 05:15:46 -0400
Received: by cerebrum (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 519a3c73
 (TLSv1.3:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:256:NO); 
 Mon, 12 May 2025 09:15:35 +0000 (UTC)
From: Rutherther <rutherther@HIDDEN>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#78356: Broken system and home containers
In-Reply-To: <87v7q643bd.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <87r00wjvm3.fsf@HIDDEN> <87v7q643bd.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 11:15:33 +0200
Message-ID: <871psuxk96.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ditigal.xyz;
 i=@ditigal.xyz; q=dns/txt; s=20240917; t=1747041335; h=from : to : cc
 : subject : in-reply-to : references : date : message-id :
 mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : from;
 bh=BRo+vXiHn56/QtbMo2gyxkKQlkDvGMBFWYsdYw1xooU=;
 b=cErKikeZnKuUu+C2xWCSC/IF8gjAkhpZVq/Cns3rYkWlTvRvSEomahKzAoJshK/ZvEBfO
 I24Al6ih6HOyx32i2QmsuSr9noN0aw7ZgcMExqHpikbNsMvSsV4sVU6XqNq8lIh6FXUfFsp
 CYfMs5BS2Qs59XDqHpk2RtSm1kaA4WY=
X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  Hi Ludo Ludovic Courtès <ludo@HIDDEN> writes: > > What command
    did you run, precisely? I cannot experience it: For home, I tried my own
   config, and since I was pretty sure any system container is affected (tried
    a simple one, my one and I know one other person reported this in Matrix
   channel), I didn't try any [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (2.5 points, 10.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD      Untrustworthy TLDs
                             [URI: ditigal.xyz (xyz)]
  0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
  0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD   From abused NTLD
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 78356
Cc: 78356 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  Hi Ludo Ludovic Courtès <ludo@HIDDEN> writes: > > What command
    did you run, precisely? I cannot experience it: For home, I tried my own
   config, and since I was pretty sure any system container is affected (tried
    a simple one, my one and I know one other person reported this in Matrix
   channel), I didn't try any [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (2.5 points, 10.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD      Untrustworthy TLDs
                             [URI: ditigal.xyz (xyz)]
  0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
  0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD   From abused NTLD
  1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD      Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD
 -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
                             manager


Hi Ludo

Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@HIDDEN> writes:
>
> What command did you run, precisely?  I cannot experience it:

For home, I tried my own config, and since I was pretty sure any system
container is affected (tried a simple one, my one and I know one other
person reported this in Matrix channel), I didn't try anything simpler
and just assumed all homes are going to be affected as well.
Now trying simpler config you mentioned, that one works fine.

The command was `guix home container -L ./home/modules ./home/home-containe=
r.scm`
in my repository. It's here https://git.ditigal.xyz/~ruther/guix-config.
Any idea what service could cause this behavior with lock-mounts? Would
be good to isolate it, but I am not sure where to start.

Here is the unshare error I was talking about earlier:
> guix home: error: unshare: 268566528: Invalid argument
Now I am getting it consistently, before it was missing sometimes.
Currently on
```
> ./target/guix/bin/guix describe
  guix 300d29e
    repository URL: https://codeberg.org/guix/guix-mirror
    branch: master
    commit: 300d29e69988caf23684f08effa51f621c7ec083
  nonguix 1940698
    repository URL: https://gitlab.com/nonguix/nonguix
    branch: master
    commit: 19406981a9bf9d0b140180f1f3008cb91f716b4b
  ruther 1a49e47
    repository URL: https://git.ditigal.xyz/~ruther/guix-exprs
    branch: main
    commit: 1a49e4760bd922237532fa2eee44bc9e1fe42399
  rde bf8f628
    repository URL: https://git.sr.ht/~abcdw/rde
    branch: master
    commit: bf8f628c4deb9acc94e261db80d301048ea1f0a2
```

Thanks
Rutherther




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#78356; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 78356 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 78356) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 May 2025 08:54:57 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 12 04:54:57 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50071 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1uEOw5-0003uw-6h
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2025 04:54:57 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45040)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1uEOvw-0003u6-9i
 for 78356 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2025 04:54:49 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1uEOvq-00033T-U2; Mon, 12 May 2025 04:54:42 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To:
 From; bh=9GsGOqt8ZbChnqVVTBwyaVHOVluWG80cWD9xGzW2SxM=; b=h8ZiZDFcBc1dLI/Wlr+C
 5/fIODbgbDd+JkJz/PTBzj+PTW88Bo0ah9EY4QwIafkOH9g9y14VADaP7i/cjEnFTI5PtcRT/0fZT
 AIPDWMsCA077J1r3qZB8XaqrCiJDcCrYRpab7eKqkEnCY8LmLmnqcuD3pF4qtk50dXAoZVK+hGZpk
 BpJVy/wTGEud0Sxfq+1GjSEXo+KH37Is56X95E7pNpOHhZNeL82040waaWmz4AGxb8AFS8wWiNga6
 gECJCcGuNfjskmsjgNNa1viY3IJVUfIqs/urN9HhHa08cCR1ZN04yAgHjiyEsI8fepNWqSgSmnJV+
 gbLVg8P0wTF97Q==;
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
To: Rutherther <rutherther@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#78356: Broken system and home containers
In-Reply-To: <87r00wjvm3.fsf@HIDDEN> (rutherther@HIDDEN's message of
 "Sat, 10 May 2025 18:09:24 +0200")
References: <87r00wjvm3.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 10:54:14 +0200
Message-ID: <87v7q643bd.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 78356
Cc: 78356 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-)

Hi,

Rutherther <rutherther@HIDDEN> writes:

> Seems that the recent commit 'Lock mounts by default'
> a57ed987ffd1452ba5a4d70feb54893e99b8e076 has broken both guix system
> container and guix home container. For system container, the system
> container command finishes fine, but then running the run-container
> script fails. For home container the command itself errors out, since
> it's what is starting the container as well.
>
> Here are the backtraces:
> guix system:

Fixed in 437bb9ece55f37d4b5a62cafc98c0c3b848a53ce.

> guix home:

What command did you run, precisely?  I cannot experience it:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix describe
Generation 345	mai 11 2025 23:03:38	(current)
  shepherd a54a503
    repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/shepherd.git
    branch: main
    commit: a54a503b01f9da4f6fb49d736dcf90da0fe51f1b
  guile af96820
    repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guile.git
    branch: main
    commit: af96820e072d18c49ac03e80c6f3466d568dc77d
  guix 300d29e
    repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
    branch: master
    commit: 300d29e69988caf23684f08effa51f621c7ec083
$ guix home container doc/he-config-bare-bones.scm
substitute: looking for substitutes on 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0%
substitute: looking for substitutes on 'https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org'... 1=
00.0%
substitute: looking for substitutes on 'https://guix.bordeaux.inria.fr'... =
100.0%
The following derivations will be built:
  /gnu/store/3j1dim91nm280hfhfjh9j130f77svhpk-provenance.drv
  /gnu/store/ni8rlk32hbr7s6gyps0dr0lfy7g9c5dl-shepherd.conf.drv
  /gnu/store/4khnkn4rab0p6vv9h99n9yfmk2lm1jwj-on-first-login.drv
  /gnu/store/lm40rfw0y4jank8bw5m05mjkwbw9w1bd-bashrc.drv
  /gnu/store/6as6qxw72lcr90gml6wk8mjib5rj8j87-files.drv
  /gnu/store/dqlgr0jg3kiyzbbc4pmd9vk188sl3kh1-activate.drv
  /gnu/store/qdsfz93g85l509qvw199j2b86nh2iqz8-profile.drv
  /gnu/store/jig19g154iqhp7yml0yd93g3rqhf855k-home.drv

building /gnu/store/3j1dim91nm280hfhfjh9j130f77svhpk-provenance.drv...
building /gnu/store/lm40rfw0y4jank8bw5m05mjkwbw9w1bd-bashrc.drv...
building CA certificate bundle...
listing Emacs sub-directories...
building /gnu/store/ni8rlk32hbr7s6gyps0dr0lfy7g9c5dl-shepherd.conf.drv...
building profile with 3 packages...
building /gnu/store/dqlgr0jg3kiyzbbc4pmd9vk188sl3kh1-activate.drv...
building /gnu/store/6as6qxw72lcr90gml6wk8mjib5rj8j87-files.drv...
building /gnu/store/4khnkn4rab0p6vv9h99n9yfmk2lm1jwj-on-first-login.drv...
building /gnu/store/jig19g154iqhp7yml0yd93g3rqhf855k-home.drv...
The following derivations will be built:
  /gnu/store/si9ibx12dkqir83z7bd0bic06d9a0p9q-module-import.drv
  /gnu/store/md9kdf2whka0gnaylhypbrw760184wk1-home-system-profile.drv

building profile with 1 package...
building /gnu/store/si9ibx12dkqir83z7bd0bic06d9a0p9q-module-import.drv...
WARNING: (guile-user): imported module (guix build utils) overrides core bi=
nding `delete'
WARNING: (guile-user): imported module (guix build utils) overrides core bi=
nding `delete'
Symlinking /home/ludo/.bashrc -> /gnu/store/b9ppn0jdrda5h88mw5x35m2jvms8izw=
6-bashrc... done
Symlinking /home/ludo/.bash_profile -> /gnu/store/gghay5fzpad5w7082nnk6z9lj=
7q00drv-bash_profile... done
Symlinking /home/ludo/.profile -> /gnu/store/vvxqfhlkpi90bgmfh1b03kkwfq7pmf=
kk-shell-profile... done
Symlinking /home/ludo/.config/test.conf -> /gnu/store/i8wsnvh1q8lbgyf50vapf=
sn2rfj7a2nc-tmp-file.txt... done
Symlinking /home/ludo/.config/fontconfig/fonts.conf -> /gnu/store/mw4clgkwj=
3rvlnfv0gd694aabvamr0sa-fonts.conf... done
Symlinking /home/ludo/.config/shepherd/init.scm -> /gnu/store/ysg5icpancicn=
1hi2gfd1q3xvmmgb8lf-shepherd.conf... done
 done
Finished updating symlinks.

Comparing /gnu/store/non-existing-generation/profile/share/fonts and
          /gnu/store/9ylfbl50dlng3rqp1kvd3qalr87yyjcl-home/profile/share/fo=
nts... done (same)
Evaluating on-change gexps.

On-change gexps evaluation finished.

ludo@ribbon ~$ id
uid=3D1000(ludo) gid=3D1000(users) groups=3D1000(users),65534(overflow)
ludo@ribbon ~$ ls
ludo@ribbon ~$ logout
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#78356; Package guix. Full text available.
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@HIDDEN> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. Full text available.

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 May 2025 16:09:40 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 10 12:09:40 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48610 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1uDmlg-0002NM-BN
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 May 2025 12:09:40 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:55480)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rutherther@HIDDEN>)
 id 1uDmle-0002Ml-Iu
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 May 2025 12:09:39 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <rutherther@HIDDEN>)
 id 1uDmlW-0005x5-IQ
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Sat, 10 May 2025 12:09:30 -0400
Received: from ditigal.xyz ([2a01:4f8:1c1b:6a1c::] helo=mail.ditigal.xyz)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <rutherther@HIDDEN>)
 id 1uDmlU-00089J-Na
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Sat, 10 May 2025 12:09:30 -0400
Received: by cerebrum (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id e7b7e177
 (TLSv1.3:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:256:NO) for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>;
 Sat, 10 May 2025 16:09:25 +0000 (UTC)
From: Rutherther <rutherther@HIDDEN>
To: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Subject: Broken system and home containers
X-Debbugs-Cc: ludo@HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 10 May 2025 18:09:24 +0200
Message-ID: <87r00wjvm3.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ditigal.xyz;
 i=@ditigal.xyz; q=dns/txt; s=20240917; t=1746893366; h=from : to :
 subject : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type :
 content-transfer-encoding : from;
 bh=6oUEoxsWABqsQfr8v/oSTP0n/fF+XZ+f4TBiQkucvy4=;
 b=nhYGirbELcXNRAOFA9AL7vVzir9l6FKPy9o5PCTmzcqOiN/rS3VYP4pCRhsVgMCCSsdFC
 Y+KY//H0/0FiGby6KbvwOlWmiRqij/5ck+pUrhw8K4oNyIptKFzjV1w6k+XyL5QNw60I0ce
 fQXNNSi25m/vbf6RfbJG7s2r7tXZ5tM=
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:4f8:1c1b:6a1c::;
 envelope-from=rutherther@HIDDEN; helo=mail.ditigal.xyz
X-Spam_score_int: 4
X-Spam_score: 0.4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: (0.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD=0.499,
 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP=0.001, PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD=1.999, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: 3.4 (+++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview: Seems that the recent commit 'Lock mounts by default'
 a57ed987ffd1452ba5a4d70feb54893e99b8e076
 has broken both guix system container and guix home container. For system
 container, the system container [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (3.4 points, 10.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD      Untrustworthy TLDs
 [URI: ditigal.xyz (xyz)]
 -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
 0.9 SPF_FAIL               SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail)
 [SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom;
 id=rutherther%40ditigal.xyz; ip=2001%3A470%3A142%3A%3A17; r=debbugs.gnu.org]
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 no trust [2001:470:142:0:0:0:0:17 listed in] [list.dnswl.org]
 0.0 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP From abused NTLD
 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD   From abused NTLD
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 2.4 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  Seems that the recent commit 'Lock mounts by default' a57ed987ffd1452ba5a4d70feb54893e99b8e076
    has broken both guix system container and guix home container. For system
    container, the system container [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (2.4 points, 10.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
                              no trust
                             [2001:470:142:0:0:0:0:17 listed in]
                             [list.dnswl.org]
  2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD      Untrustworthy TLDs
                             [URI: ditigal.xyz (xyz)]
 -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
  0.9 SPF_FAIL               SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail)
 [SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom;id=rutherther%40ditigal.xyz;ip=2001%3A470%3A142%3A%3A17;r=debbugs.gnu.org]
  0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD   From abused NTLD
 -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
                             manager


Seems that the recent commit 'Lock mounts by default'
a57ed987ffd1452ba5a4d70feb54893e99b8e076 has broken both guix system
container and guix home container. For system container, the system
container command finishes fine, but then running the run-container
script fails. For home container the command itself errors out, since
it's what is starting the container as well.

Here are the backtraces:
guix system:
```
Backtrace:
           7 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/p3m2srwhv49gv1lk2yi4i73b9mn=E2=80=
=A6")
In gnu/build/linux-container.scm:
    368:8  6 (call-with-temporary-directory #<procedure 7f02cddd1af0=E2=80=
=A6>)
   476:16  5 (_ "/tmp/guix-directory.DGavex")
     62:6  4 (call-with-clean-exit #<procedure 7f02ce52ab80 at gnu/b=E2=80=
=A6>)
   323:22  3 (_)
    215:2  2 (initialize-user-namespace 1 65536 #:host-uid _ # _ # _ =E2=80=
=A6)
In ice-9/ports.scm:
    435:6  1 (call-with-output-file _ _ #:binary _ #:encoding _)
In unknown file:
           0 (close-port #<output: /proc/1/uid_map 6>)

ERROR: In procedure close-port:
In procedure fport_write: Operation not permitted
system container is running as PID #f
Run 'sudo guix container exec #f /run/current-system/profile/bin/bash --log=
in'
or run 'sudo nsenter -a -t #f' to get a shell into it.

Backtrace:
           3 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/p3m2srwhv49gv1lk2yi4i73b9mn=E2=80=
=A6")
In gnu/build/linux-container.scm:
    368:8  2 (call-with-temporary-directory #<procedure 7f02cddd1af0=E2=80=
=A6>)
    485:7  1 (_ "/tmp/guix-directory.DGavex")
In unknown file:
           0 (waitpid #f #<undefined>)
```

guix home:
```
Backtrace:
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
  1752:10 14 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _)
In unknown file:
          13 (apply-smob/0 #<thunk 7fe026e942a0>)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
    724:2 12 (call-with-prompt _ _ #<procedure default-prompt-handle?>)
In ice-9/eval.scm:
    619:8 11 (_ #(#(#<directory (guile-user) 7fe026e99c80>)))
In ice-9/command-line.scm:
   185:19 10 (_ #<input: string 7fe026e93850>)
In unknown file:
           9 (eval (begin (use-modules (guix build utils) (# ?)) # ?) ?)
In ice-9/eval.scm:
    619:8  8 (_ #f)
In unknown file:
           7 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/9kr07956x74cs9cql5jj3kdvb7f?")
In ice-9/eval.scm:
    619:8  6 (_ #(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#<?> ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?))
   626:19  5 (_ #(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#<?> ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?))
    619:8  4 (_ #(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#<?> ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?))
In unknown file:
           3 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/j7v0sgg2grb9x8n6h2xh2cyvyf7?")
In ice-9/eval.scm:
   293:34  2 (_ #(#(#(#(#(#(#<directory (guile-use?> ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?))
In ice-9/ports.scm:
   450:11  1 (call-with-input-file _ #<procedure 7fe01d5b3a60 at ic?> ?)
In unknown file:
           0 (open-file #<unspecified> "r" #:encoding #f # #f)

ERROR: In procedure open-file:
Wrong type (expecting string): #<unspecified>
```

Additionally at one moment I was able to get an error message with guix
home that unshare has gotten an invalid argument, the argument was just
a number.

Unfortunately I was not able to understand what the issue is to fix it.

Regards
Rutherther




Acknowledgement sent to Rutherther <rutherther@HIDDEN>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to ludo@HIDDEN, bug-guix@HIDDEN. Full text available.
Report forwarded to ludo@HIDDEN, bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#78356; Package guix. Full text available.
Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.
Last modified: Thu, 15 May 2025 08:45:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.