Ludovic Courtès <ludo@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
Full text available.
Received: (at 78383) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 May 2025 17:44:47 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 14 13:44:47 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44954 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1uFG9v-0001L8-1j
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 May 2025 13:44:47 -0400
Received: from ditigal.xyz ([2a01:4f8:1c1b:6a1c::]:43096 helo=mail.ditigal.xyz)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rutherther@HIDDEN>)
id 1uFG9s-0001Ka-Tc
for 78383 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 May 2025 13:44:45 -0400
Received: by cerebrum (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 90a0dbc6
(TLSv1.3:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:256:NO);
Wed, 14 May 2025 17:44:37 +0000 (UTC)
From: Rutherther <rutherther@HIDDEN>
To: 78383 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH guix-consensus-documents 1/1] 001-gcd-process: Rectify
date.
In-Reply-To: <20250511193125.5205-2-noelopez@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 19:44:35 +0200
Message-ID: <87tt5nf5oc.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ditigal.xyz;
i=@ditigal.xyz; q=dns/txt; s=20240917; t=1747244677; h=from : to : cc
: subject : in-reply-to : date : message-id : mime-version :
content-type : from; bh=2+VMjshUAIsxgXO/rDHCQVPk1j6flU0Wh3/WgYmbB2s=;
b=QSX6mBjlZoO8fWlwoe58tjcatmenMPw0dNWX0+5VMN5t+UpRu8hfiXpeCJS1Ei3cF9NnB
KiURns8JawCA8pIGiT0bEZOgz6eLHrLqs9VbjaRS93az/sn5FJudP97qDeYCRMsnoLeIcBg
o2fBu2B5yw5rNRgKSXzhrhCvRyBMn4A=
X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: > Truly an off-by-one error of all time. > --- Hi, I think
you made an off by one error, and wanted to send this patch to 78382 with
the cover letter. :)
Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs
[URI: ditigal.xyz (xyz)]
0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 78383
Cc: =?utf-8?Q?No=C3=A9?= Lopez <noelopez@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: > Truly an off-by-one error of all time. > --- Hi, I think
you made an off by one error, and wanted to send this patch to 78382 with
the cover letter. :)
Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs
[URI: ditigal.xyz (xyz)]
0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD
1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD
-1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
manager
> Truly an off-by-one error of all time.
> ---
Hi, I think you made an off by one error, and wanted to send this patch to
78382 with the cover letter. :)
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#78383; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 May 2025 19:32:35 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 11 15:32:35 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42629 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1uECPb-0000q6-F5 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 May 2025 15:32:35 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:45174) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <noelopez@HIDDEN>) id 1uECPY-0000pe-RU for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 May 2025 15:32:33 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <noelopez@HIDDEN>) id 1uECPD-0000XS-G9 for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Sun, 11 May 2025 15:32:16 -0400 Received: from smtp1-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.1]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <noelopez@HIDDEN>) id 1uECPC-0000uO-0q for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Sun, 11 May 2025 15:32:11 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0a:990:a960:b4f3:8f44:ec4:5af5]) (Authenticated sender: noelopez@HIDDEN) by smtp1-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 339D6B00593; Sun, 11 May 2025 21:32:07 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=free.fr; s=smtp-20201208; t=1746991928; bh=wjSE2TJjeiWkelkt5mrfuycPPniZUmzDKhO1ALgTqvA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=urWNIEYMCbCuvapDp6Q5PVSSGJb4Nh2TWjmcSw91LuHqqKHtb/rXG+PsJR/jJpSoT 5Rg1ymcw/Pjs84G6NmzZVZsatPLKCuFBUyhVHdfEidYJnZb5MdoO8XrhfzYwNApDu9 Z0usHz9DAM0LbXat8WIHKsHN8A0xJ4DeqEwTH5D8Iic6ZRsPHjgptNut+jd1KblVoT NLe2v9E+O0RnMBK+Cpzg5brIrhnMp+nIpJ06bCDmOOpxijxxYkSFlWniOiXc99TWTM RQyC2SjyJYui9+aLvUb7gGffpGVSuqA47MdlfvCKZOfqQbWGilZmy/UdQOnC87dMGc BZB4nZe1Uqq8w== From: =?UTF-8?q?No=C3=A9=20Lopez?= <noelopez@HIDDEN> To: guix-patches@HIDDEN Subject: [PATCH guix-consensus-documents 1/1] 001-gcd-process: Rectify date. Date: Sun, 11 May 2025 21:31:22 +0200 Message-ID: <20250511193125.5205-2-noelopez@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <20250511193125.5205-1-noelopez@HIDDEN> References: <20250511193125.5205-1-noelopez@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.27.42.1; envelope-from=noelopez@HIDDEN; helo=smtp1-g21.free.fr X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: =?UTF-8?q?No=C3=A9=20Lopez?= <noelopez@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) Truly an off-by-one error of all time. --- 001-gcd-process.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/001-gcd-process.md b/001-gcd-process.md index 5d1db5a..2c3d187 100644 --- a/001-gcd-process.md +++ b/001-gcd-process.md @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ status: accepted discussion: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/74736 authors: Simon Tournier, Noé Lopez, Ludovic Courtès sponsors: pukkamustard, Ricardo Wurmus -date: 2025-12-08 +date: 2024-12-08 SPDX-License-Identifier: CC-BY-SA-4.0 OR GFDL-1.3-no-invariants-or-later --- -- 2.49.0
Noé Lopez <noelopez@HIDDEN>:guix-patches@HIDDEN.
Full text available.guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#78383; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.