Received: (at 78383) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 May 2025 14:20:41 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 24 10:20:41 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33145 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1uIpjt-0003Aq-5L for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 May 2025 10:20:41 -0400 Received: from 1.mo563.mail-out.ovh.net ([178.33.106.244]:60571) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ngraves@HIDDEN>) id 1uIpjo-0003AL-4h for 78383 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 May 2025 10:20:38 -0400 Received: from director2.derp.mail-out.ovh.net (director2.derp.mail-out.ovh.net [79.137.60.36]) by mo563.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4b4PM62MJNz1cp8; Sat, 24 May 2025 14:20:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from director2.derp.mail-out.ovh.net (director2.derp.mail-out.ovh.net. [127.0.0.1]) by director2.derp.mail-out.ovh.net (inspect_sender_mail_agent) with SMTP for <78383 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 24 May 2025 14:20:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mta3.priv.ovhmail-u1.ea.mail.ovh.net (unknown [10.109.176.78]) by director2.derp.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4b4PM60gFSz1xw7; Sat, 24 May 2025 14:20:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ngraves.fr (unknown [10.1.6.2]) by mta3.priv.ovhmail-u1.ea.mail.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD85C3A4033; Sat, 24 May 2025 14:20:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: garm.ovh; auth=pass (GARM-96R001e2327792-203d-4b7c-b563-b92ce1d6bc4c, 04FE77D802A16570F9B5D13455A67696A98B0862) smtp.auth=ngraves@HIDDEN X-OVh-ClientIp: 89.234.140.98 From: Nicolas Graves <ngraves@HIDDEN> To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org,78383 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: QA review for 78383 Date: Sat, 24 May 2025 16:20:33 +0200 Message-ID: <8734cuhyz2.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 15398370079545352805 X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: 0 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtddtgdduudelheculddtuddrgeefvddrtddtmdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjpdevjffgvefmvefgnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucehtddtnecunecujfgurhephffvufffkfggtgfgsehtqhertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefpihgtohhlrghsucfirhgrvhgvshcuoehnghhrrghvvghssehnghhrrghvvghsrdhfrheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepjeegveeuiefhleekveetffekvdduteehkeekgfegheelfeetteevfeehjeegvddtnecukfhppeduvdejrddtrddtrddupdekledrvdefgedrudegtddrleeknecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehinhgvthepuddvjedrtddrtddruddpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehnghhrrghvvghssehnghhrrghvvghsrdhfrhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepvddprhgtphhtthhopeejkeefkeefseguvggssghughhsrdhgnhhurdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtoheptghonhhtrhholhesuggvsggsuhhgshdrghhnuhdrohhrghdpoffvtefjohhsthepmhhoheeifegmpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuth DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=wG6kqGjgMvrZd4LhoCjczHpbNsR8/6tNDzTAt3fgj+4=; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ngraves.fr; h=From; s=ovhmo4487190-selector1; t=1748096434; v=1; b=GqXPJzJnxfVGPAoPMLlFic0RmQwPbyelMz7JbwRRuX3PUK0zNb0EsLyMxkpfV/DXLvDgLYQX LO+qvGe7aLzjegWvrjc+YN39LrJCZfNQg/XC04zMMLyJiysCmbfWxjrAdCZXj5z69c+ty5sCV4p 99HkD0UKrGu90USyB3sMIMJ+lmjAPprOmCPpE/+FZh2gGWlpfGia+Xx3MFXU/e9ui77VLJMkHl5 1rifGRLx+IZ5pZgYrLxRN3Hl6itGm8UMMj7r9VjkbmB9bWjI8szHSI8T2HiyYs1xsecmqp87Afi uTfz9zW0FZ/iE2mmuAK9Te/lgjz9rr6YeOF+uCmuehNfA== X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 78383 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) user guix usertag 78383 + reviewed-looks-good thanks Guix QA review form submission: Hi No=C3=A9,=20 Thanks for this correction, LGTM. Nicolas No checks recorded. --=20 Best regards, Nicolas Graves
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#78383; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 78383) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 May 2025 06:08:19 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 15 02:08:18 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50015 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1uFRlS-0004ub-Dm for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 May 2025 02:08:18 -0400 Received: from smtp1-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.1]:25934) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <noelopez@HIDDEN>) id 1uFRlQ-0004u2-5L for 78383 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 May 2025 02:08:16 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0a:990:a960:b4f3:8f44:ec4:5af5]) (Authenticated sender: noelopez@HIDDEN) by smtp1-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0715BB0055E; Thu, 15 May 2025 08:08:12 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=free.fr; s=smtp-20201208; t=1747289294; bh=PKemUfqGUwHRAB6BynBpUL0OsCyOUGgddxXC9+I2Sz0=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=C6iATx+yM1Tq0wgGVQnOVBpHJaJx0pLyOBM/Yq3/bxB+pjktDjPkTnzOzspdYISrh OFLd3qW5IELgboEq94tNHHdx6GDlqx5KQmFuJUG4FvoVeqRCy8OF3vfeD3+Vxoc95P X3caN7gGu+/0wUJtjtHnLd4MlG2H7W/iM8b7fkFsBEOY7SoT26ZOBMYufv7jNycvau k1dhVdzRh2anmPOvJipWB55U+szkXPA+zz7+CI+jEZsH+gDM5Q/FdtLKrtnHXJ2kzf On2j9OYQruJRX2rj34l66hcoTXhzom1fJ7B8lseKVkSrTaJfBWmAxvlV2G1nPIPkDA aDOKIFHI6lV3g== From: =?utf-8?Q?No=C3=A9?= Lopez <noelopez@HIDDEN> To: Rutherther <rutherther@HIDDEN>, 78383 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH guix-consensus-documents 1/1] 001-gcd-process: Rectify date. In-Reply-To: <87tt5nf5oc.fsf@HIDDEN> References: <87tt5nf5oc.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 08:08:07 +0200 Message-ID: <87ldqys8xk.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Rutherther writes: >> Truly an off-by-one error of all time. >> --- > > Hi, I think you made an off by one error, and wanted to send this patch to > 78382 with the cover letter. :) I just thought the patch was so important it deserved two issue numbers! :P Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. [212.27.42.1 listed in sa-trusted.bondedsender.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.27.42.1 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. [212.27.42.1 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [212.27.42.1 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ditigal.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (noelopez[at]free.fr) 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 78383 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Rutherther <rutherther@HIDDEN> writes: >> Truly an off-by-one error of all time. >> --- > > Hi, I think you made an off by one error, and wanted to send this patch to > 78382 with the cover letter. :) I just thought the patch was so important it deserved two issue numbers! :P Good morning, No=C3=A9 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQHFBAEBCAAvFiEEXVTPJVeyOOiNwYCiLSIyQQq3QEMFAmglhMgRHG5vZWxvcGV6 QGZyZWUuZnIACgkQLSIyQQq3QEOkzgv/c8R0ZRLr1uv4aqt90ciAmWXdyJiJ/xzi yszS/feQBrKCWWxS40pAaxGIa+6Vf0PCTuLTkSx+n2Ysutx5S2e/syQOExOKgULr Pped/JE5f6QYCPIQqZUp0vqR+hTeiJXSw5WCReMK2WT3XjdoKe69wTMiUU0ayJnH +XtS16ss+eI7VfvL5QfTJ2gr54L5NX2Tpz2Qw6ADzQDDQI68Y48PtU7MnZwDI3gh C3AEgQRc5adm7ucm692tcEIap+reuehKCMpyhYA8McmlrdCuRmV/o1rdAQvZyBrb TUfxzWf4qIgkmr9UBQkegdhJ8b7KeU0oJFom2JxaVNkB3fdbdbFsLK8WD65RLJyQ ubjVi+X/NnPrEZkniAhax0YHpTdMrC3qLb2g18G4bNE7dNRA1gj4Ure379YwLXzz /VXosPrajLrY13/MSc/bX3YVLCpJpxXNP9/x5Ma1RbaslEySk7+YoWQc5SsvFvNE 8t23kIm4inpjboql9KmIzvW2DfB907z0 =F5/c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#78383; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Ludovic Courtès <ludo@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
Full text available.
Received: (at 78383) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 May 2025 17:44:47 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 14 13:44:47 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44954 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1uFG9v-0001L8-1j
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 May 2025 13:44:47 -0400
Received: from ditigal.xyz ([2a01:4f8:1c1b:6a1c::]:43096 helo=mail.ditigal.xyz)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rutherther@HIDDEN>)
id 1uFG9s-0001Ka-Tc
for 78383 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 May 2025 13:44:45 -0400
Received: by cerebrum (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 90a0dbc6
(TLSv1.3:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:256:NO);
Wed, 14 May 2025 17:44:37 +0000 (UTC)
From: Rutherther <rutherther@HIDDEN>
To: 78383 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH guix-consensus-documents 1/1] 001-gcd-process: Rectify
date.
In-Reply-To: <20250511193125.5205-2-noelopez@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 19:44:35 +0200
Message-ID: <87tt5nf5oc.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ditigal.xyz;
i=@ditigal.xyz; q=dns/txt; s=20240917; t=1747244677; h=from : to : cc
: subject : in-reply-to : date : message-id : mime-version :
content-type : from; bh=2+VMjshUAIsxgXO/rDHCQVPk1j6flU0Wh3/WgYmbB2s=;
b=QSX6mBjlZoO8fWlwoe58tjcatmenMPw0dNWX0+5VMN5t+UpRu8hfiXpeCJS1Ei3cF9NnB
KiURns8JawCA8pIGiT0bEZOgz6eLHrLqs9VbjaRS93az/sn5FJudP97qDeYCRMsnoLeIcBg
o2fBu2B5yw5rNRgKSXzhrhCvRyBMn4A=
X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: > Truly an off-by-one error of all time. > --- Hi, I think
you made an off by one error, and wanted to send this patch to 78382 with
the cover letter. :)
Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs
[URI: ditigal.xyz (xyz)]
0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 78383
Cc: =?utf-8?Q?No=C3=A9?= Lopez <noelopez@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: > Truly an off-by-one error of all time. > --- Hi, I think
you made an off by one error, and wanted to send this patch to 78382 with
the cover letter. :)
Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs
[URI: ditigal.xyz (xyz)]
0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD
1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD
-1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
manager
> Truly an off-by-one error of all time.
> ---
Hi, I think you made an off by one error, and wanted to send this patch to
78382 with the cover letter. :)
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#78383; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 May 2025 19:32:35 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 11 15:32:35 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42629 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1uECPb-0000q6-F5 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 May 2025 15:32:35 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:45174) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <noelopez@HIDDEN>) id 1uECPY-0000pe-RU for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 May 2025 15:32:33 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <noelopez@HIDDEN>) id 1uECPD-0000XS-G9 for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Sun, 11 May 2025 15:32:16 -0400 Received: from smtp1-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.1]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <noelopez@HIDDEN>) id 1uECPC-0000uO-0q for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Sun, 11 May 2025 15:32:11 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0a:990:a960:b4f3:8f44:ec4:5af5]) (Authenticated sender: noelopez@HIDDEN) by smtp1-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 339D6B00593; Sun, 11 May 2025 21:32:07 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=free.fr; s=smtp-20201208; t=1746991928; bh=wjSE2TJjeiWkelkt5mrfuycPPniZUmzDKhO1ALgTqvA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=urWNIEYMCbCuvapDp6Q5PVSSGJb4Nh2TWjmcSw91LuHqqKHtb/rXG+PsJR/jJpSoT 5Rg1ymcw/Pjs84G6NmzZVZsatPLKCuFBUyhVHdfEidYJnZb5MdoO8XrhfzYwNApDu9 Z0usHz9DAM0LbXat8WIHKsHN8A0xJ4DeqEwTH5D8Iic6ZRsPHjgptNut+jd1KblVoT NLe2v9E+O0RnMBK+Cpzg5brIrhnMp+nIpJ06bCDmOOpxijxxYkSFlWniOiXc99TWTM RQyC2SjyJYui9+aLvUb7gGffpGVSuqA47MdlfvCKZOfqQbWGilZmy/UdQOnC87dMGc BZB4nZe1Uqq8w== From: =?UTF-8?q?No=C3=A9=20Lopez?= <noelopez@HIDDEN> To: guix-patches@HIDDEN Subject: [PATCH guix-consensus-documents 1/1] 001-gcd-process: Rectify date. Date: Sun, 11 May 2025 21:31:22 +0200 Message-ID: <20250511193125.5205-2-noelopez@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <20250511193125.5205-1-noelopez@HIDDEN> References: <20250511193125.5205-1-noelopez@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.27.42.1; envelope-from=noelopez@HIDDEN; helo=smtp1-g21.free.fr X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: =?UTF-8?q?No=C3=A9=20Lopez?= <noelopez@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) Truly an off-by-one error of all time. --- 001-gcd-process.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/001-gcd-process.md b/001-gcd-process.md index 5d1db5a..2c3d187 100644 --- a/001-gcd-process.md +++ b/001-gcd-process.md @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ status: accepted discussion: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/74736 authors: Simon Tournier, Noé Lopez, Ludovic Courtès sponsors: pukkamustard, Ricardo Wurmus -date: 2025-12-08 +date: 2024-12-08 SPDX-License-Identifier: CC-BY-SA-4.0 OR GFDL-1.3-no-invariants-or-later --- -- 2.49.0
Noé Lopez <noelopez@HIDDEN>:guix-patches@HIDDEN.
Full text available.guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#78383; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.