Arash Esbati <arash@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jun 2025 03:54:54 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 04 23:54:54 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56749 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1uN1gq-0004Hn-V4 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2025 23:54:54 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:60572) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rahguzar@HIDDEN>) id 1uN1gn-0004H0-Uq for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2025 23:54:50 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <rahguzar@HIDDEN>) id 1uN1gh-0000zm-9F for bug-auctex@HIDDEN; Wed, 04 Jun 2025 23:54:43 -0400 Received: from mout-p-101.mailbox.org ([2001:67c:2050:0:465::101]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <rahguzar@HIDDEN>) id 1uN1gd-0004KO-7L for bug-auctex@HIDDEN; Wed, 04 Jun 2025 23:54:40 -0400 Received: from smtp102.mailbox.org (smtp102.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:b231:465::102]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-101.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4bCVvB07f4z9ssx; Thu, 5 Jun 2025 05:54:30 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailbox.org; s=mail20150812; t=1749095670; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=zlJc5R/LRAnlC53mv1ymn9YWgmNHxa2CTER3lwGv2HU=; b=qH9Y63QAY7SCfZ15cqlWY1MOT+QH2xho8PqJBEqy6je7WAXG8k7U7ObUpN5bsFzhngdUj6 f5MmUCpxXqcCqUMdYNeAqGVQLSf4Vq8haGTzKjuB2K8uC62+daIs4gWBr/UkCKWIqKos+E 0b6C4EknMEuptkBp2aCooQnNsp0rVhDTFiaaVx+h3ufe5+/w1NNPo/GvqFICuWbXCZH6NP SxChvTniWWhkMZXj7gHHVLnIRGqL/58wmiytiLLJLnmJ2ZXdrZ7ACQyRgzVK5z9y+IuJ4s GnDzFN4yNuTsXeo4nkXhSs3A+rZbxRP0ekkZlVJRQ2s2m5HVzmDPMaJI3e+Tjw== From: Rahguzar <rahguzar@HIDDEN> To: "Paul D. Nelson" <ultrono@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: 14.0.9; Folding of math macros with a function spec is broken In-Reply-To: <uxsg7tqzzzulcx.fsf@HIDDEN> (Paul D. Nelson's message of "Thu, 05 Jun 2025 01:40:14 +0200") References: <uxsg7tqzzzulcx.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2025 08:54:26 +0500 Message-ID: <877c1qlu6l.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MBO-RS-META: sacin878f3kpt9mrck9h6m1m8scuih9w X-MBO-RS-ID: f0c276007820de0e3ba Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:67c:2050:0:465::101; envelope-from=rahguzar@HIDDEN; helo=mout-p-101.mailbox.org X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: bug-auctex@HIDDEN X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) "Paul D. Nelson" <ultrono@HIDDEN> writes: > Hi Rahguzar, > >>>> (setq TeX-fold-math-spec-list `((,(lambda (text) (propertize text 'face '(underline))) ("underline")))) >>> >>> Is there a reason to prefer this vs. the same with >>> TeX-fold-macro-spec-list in place of TeX-fold-math-spec-list? >> >> The reason for why it is in TeX-fold-math-spec-list is that when I >> started with Emacs I stole it from Tecosaur's config. There are quite a >> few function specs in my TeX-fold-math-spec-list e.g. for sqrt, frac, >> mathcal, mathfrak and mathbb etc and most of them are relevant only for >> math. Should they be moved to TeX-fold-macro-spec-list? > > I think one can use TeX-fold-macro-spec-list for all of these. In > particular, your underline example works fine there for me. > > It's not clear to me from those what exactly are the intended purposes > of the various spec lists (macro/env/math). My impression from the > built-in examples was that the math list is for macros like "alpha" that > accept no arguments. Yes, it would be good to make this clear in the documentation. > The motivation for the offending patch was to make it so folding "\in > [0, 1]" doesn't hide the "[0, 1]" as if it were an optional arg. To > give a more robust fix that works with your code sample, we would need a > more robust way to detect when a macro is not intended to have any > (optional) arguments. The implemented approach was to just assume that > all the "math" macros accept no arguments. Do you or does anyone have > other suggestions? I have also seen the problem you are encountering so it is good to have a fix for that. I think to preserve breakage and preserve backward compatibility it would be better to either: 1) Assume that there is no white-space between the macro name and the brackets enclosing the arguments. This is probably not how TeX syntax works but I think (not too sure about this) it is the usual style. This behavior can be controlled by a custom variable. 2) Since the problem is with optional arguments we can allow { after the macro name but not [. 3) Another option can be to introduce a new spec alist for macros without optional args. > Paul Rahguzar
Rahguzar <rahguzar@HIDDEN>
:bug-auctex@HIDDEN
.
Full text available.bug-auctex@HIDDEN
:bug#78698
; Package auctex
.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.