X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#8099: LaTeX and automake Resent-From: Reuben Thomas <rrt@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-automake@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 21:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.8099.B.129841106925875 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: report 8099 X-GNU-PR-Package: automake X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-automake <bug-automake@HIDDEN> Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.129841106925875 (code B ref -1); Tue, 22 Feb 2011 21:45:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Feb 2011 21:44:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1Ps020-0006jI-Aq for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:44:28 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <rrt@HIDDEN>) id 1Ps01x-0006j4-NH for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:44:26 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rrt@HIDDEN>) id 1Ps01r-0003wW-Ui for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:44:20 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:33594) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rrt@HIDDEN>) id 1Ps01r-0003wS-ST for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:44:19 -0500 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49290 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ps01m-0000IA-Qq for bug-automake@HIDDEN; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:44:19 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rrt@HIDDEN>) id 1Ps01l-0003w0-Gs for bug-automake@HIDDEN; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:44:14 -0500 Received: from exprod7og108.obsmtp.com ([64.18.2.169]:39903) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rrt@HIDDEN>) id 1Ps01l-0003tt-73 for bug-automake@HIDDEN; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:44:13 -0500 Received: from source ([209.85.160.47]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob108.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTWQuGM4M29h0j9E+8VB6vX0iztpK86Ht@HIDDEN; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:44:12 PST Received: by mail-pw0-f47.google.com with SMTP id 9so752741pwj.20 for <bug-automake@HIDDEN>; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:43:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.178.3 with SMTP id a3mr2547858wff.191.1298411031887; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:43:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.199.21 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:43:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 21:43:51 +0000 Message-ID: <AANLkTimXGR7agwnXZ07UqbE0UfjP9UwdVAGD2Ogr8Ptt@HIDDEN> From: Reuben Thomas <rrt@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 199.232.76.165 X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/pipermail/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) I have just been investigating the state of the art for LaTeX support. As far as I can tell there's nothing official; the most "official" things I can find are some unwritten documentation in the autotoolset manual: http://autotoolset.sourceforge.net/tutorial.html and this project suggestion by Akim Demaille with the apparent knowledge of Alexandre Duret-Lutz: http://www.lrde.epita.fr/cgi-bin/twiki/view/Epita/ProjetsLibres#Automake_LaTeX_Support_and_tests which given their involvement in auto* suggests nothing has been done (although the page I quote is a few years out of date). I've just been autotooling up an old build system of mine from 15 years ago, and needed to build several LaTeX documents of modest complexity, and had no desire to fake up the relevant Make rules. I looked into several LaTeX builder scripts. I first tried LaTeX-mk, which is a Perl script optionally augmented by some Makefile fragments. I ignored the Makefile fragments as they need either GNU Make or "a BSD make program". LaTeX-mk itself, which I've used successfully for some time to build PDFs on the fly for my personal web site, sadly seems to break down in parallel builds. LaTeX-make looks better, as it uses what is says is a generic Makefile, but integrating that would've required writing support for automake. (The fact of being written in Make is not really an advantage.) I have used earlier versions of Wybo Dekker's "mk", but the current version is written in Ruby, which is a bit of an annoying dependency. Finally, I found latexmk (which took some disambiguating) by John Collins: http://www.phys.psu.edu/~collins/software/latexmk-jcc/ This is a single Perl script, so I can at least require it in maintainer mode. Since this seems to be good practice for LaTeX documents anyway, since otherwise users must have a full LaTeX system installed, and LaTeX can be quite fiddly, I thought it a reasonable compromise to distribute PDF files as EXTRA_DIST. It worked in parallel and VPATH builds (i.e. make distcheck with MAKEFLAGS containing "-j 2" was no problem), and I ended up with the following rules: PAPER_SRCS = \ $(srcdir)/foo.tex \ $(srcdir)/bar.tex \ ... PAPER_PDFS = \ $(builddir)/foo.pdf \ $(builddir)/bar.pdf \ ... pdf-local: $(PAPER_PDFS) mostlyclean-local: $(LATEXMK) -c $(PAPER_SRCS) # This would be clean-local, but we distribute the PDFs maintainer-clean-local: $(LATEXMK) -C $(PAPER_SRCS) EXTRA_DIST = $(PAPER_SRCS) $(PAPER_PDFS) .tex.pdf: $(LATEXMK) -pdf $< I'd be interested to know if this is of any interest for automake. (latexmk is distributed under the GPL, and has a single author, so there's a chance of a copyright assignment, should that be important, though I haven't asked the author about it.) To really support it properly in automake, some work would obviously be needed to add for example a LATEXS primary, with suitable prefix for installation under ${datadir}/doc, and some version of all the rules above, presumably with the different default that the PDF files are not distributed, as for texinfo, so that I could write simply: doc_LATEXS = foo.tex bar.tex EXTRA_DIST = foo.pdf bar.pdf And I guess there would be a certain amount of pain making the `pdf' target work for LaTeX and texinfo; are there other cases in which suffixes are shared between different toolchains? -- http://rrt.sc3d.org
Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Reuben Thomas <rrt@HIDDEN> Subject: bug#8099: Acknowledgement (LaTeX and automake) Message-ID: <handler.8099.B.129841106925875.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org> References: <AANLkTimXGR7agwnXZ07UqbE0UfjP9UwdVAGD2Ogr8Ptt@HIDDEN> X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 8099 X-Gnu-PR-Package: automake Reply-To: 8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 21:45:03 +0000 Thank you for filing a new bug report with GNU. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): bug-automake@HIDDEN If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please send it to 8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org. Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. --=20 8099: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D8099 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#8099: LaTeX and automake Resent-From: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-automake@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 06:55:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.8099.B8099.129878965518818 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8099 X-GNU-PR-Package: automake X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Reuben Thomas <rrt@HIDDEN> Cc: 8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 8099-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B8099.129878965518818 (code B ref 8099); Sun, 27 Feb 2011 06:55:01 +0000 Received: (at 8099) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2011 06:54:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1PtaWF-0004tT-Bl for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 01:54:15 -0500 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <Ralf.Wildenhues@HIDDEN>) id 1PtaWD-0004tG-15 for 8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 01:54:14 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2011 06:54:06 -0000 Received: from xdsl-89-0-149-175.netcologne.de (EHLO localhost.localdomain) [89.0.149.175] by mail.gmx.net (mp021) with SMTP; 27 Feb 2011 07:54:06 +0100 X-Authenticated: #13673931 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+6YrJZxbK62pPE+0xrg5N8BD2hJ32jIb3K5zTwLv 8AQ949B3B2bmsl Received: from ralf by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <Ralf.Wildenhues@HIDDEN>) id 1PtaVp-0004tj-Qy; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 07:53:49 +0100 Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 07:53:49 +0100 From: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <20110227065349.GE16255@HIDDEN> References: <AANLkTimXGR7agwnXZ07UqbE0UfjP9UwdVAGD2Ogr8Ptt@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimXGR7agwnXZ07UqbE0UfjP9UwdVAGD2Ogr8Ptt@HIDDEN> Organization: Institute for Numerical Simulation, University of Bonn User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-08-04) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/pipermail/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) Hello Reuben, * Reuben Thomas wrote on Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:43:51PM CET: > I have just been investigating the state of the art for LaTeX support. > I've just been autotooling up an old build system of mine from 15 > years ago, and needed to build several LaTeX documents of modest > complexity, and had no desire to fake up the relevant Make rules. > > I looked into several LaTeX builder scripts. > > I first tried LaTeX-mk, which is a Perl script optionally augmented by > some Makefile fragments. I ignored the Makefile fragments as they need > either GNU Make or "a BSD make program". LaTeX-mk itself, which I've > used successfully for some time to build PDFs on the fly for my > personal web site, sadly seems to break down in parallel builds. > > LaTeX-make looks better, as it uses what is says is a generic > Makefile, but integrating that would've required writing support for > automake. (The fact of being written in Make is not really an > advantage.) > > I have used earlier versions of Wybo Dekker's "mk", but the current > version is written in Ruby, which is a bit of an annoying dependency. > > Finally, I found latexmk (which took some disambiguating) by John Collins: > > http://www.phys.psu.edu/~collins/software/latexmk-jcc/ I agree with your reasoning pro latexmk. LaTeX-mk seems to have too few features to be generally useful, and I didn't bother to install LaTeX-make because it would have triggered updating/replacing of roughly 70 packages on my currently half-stable half-oldstable Debian. > This is a single Perl script, so I can at least require it in > maintainer mode. Since this seems to be good practice for LaTeX > documents anyway, since otherwise users must have a full LaTeX system > installed, and LaTeX can be quite fiddly, I thought it a reasonable > compromise to distribute PDF files as EXTRA_DIST. It worked in > parallel and VPATH builds (i.e. make distcheck with MAKEFLAGS > containing "-j 2" was no problem), and I ended up with the following > rules: > > PAPER_SRCS = \ > $(srcdir)/foo.tex \ > $(srcdir)/bar.tex \ > ... > > PAPER_PDFS = \ > $(builddir)/foo.pdf \ > $(builddir)/bar.pdf \ > ... > > pdf-local: $(PAPER_PDFS) > > mostlyclean-local: > $(LATEXMK) -c $(PAPER_SRCS) > > # This would be clean-local, but we distribute the PDFs > maintainer-clean-local: > $(LATEXMK) -C $(PAPER_SRCS) > > EXTRA_DIST = $(PAPER_SRCS) $(PAPER_PDFS) > > .tex.pdf: > $(LATEXMK) -pdf $< That looks fairly straightforward. Almost too easy to warrant special support. ;-) > I'd be interested to know if this is of any interest for automake. Well, I'm not sure if you're aiming for integrating latexmk fully in Automake (which I'm guessing the original author might not desire), or just having automake produce something like the above rules for you. The latter might be doable. It is not clear how to arrive at a sufficiently precise list of prerequisites. > doc_LATEXS = foo.tex bar.tex > > EXTRA_DIST = foo.pdf bar.pdf That strikes me as suboptimal. I have LaTeX sources that include lots of other sources, .tex ones, but also images, graphs, all sorts of generated stuff. At the very least, you'll want to be able to specify multiple sources. The _TEXINFOS support for specifying additional sources is a bit un-idiomatic, maybe we can have a spelling that includes the _SOURCES name (but foo_tex_SOURCES is technically wrong too)? And extra dependencies of course. > And I guess there would be a certain amount of pain making the `pdf' > target work for LaTeX and texinfo; are there other cases in which > suffixes are shared between different toolchains? Well, as long as can say for an individual target which it comes from it should be doable. Anyway, the next step to pursue this would be to think hard about the desired semantics, and write them down precisely, ideally as patch against the current documentation and accompanied with testsuite additions. ;-) Hope that helps. Thanks, Ralf
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#8099: LaTeX and automake Resent-From: Reuben Thomas <rrt@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-automake@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 13:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.8099.B8099.129881398427988 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8099 X-GNU-PR-Package: automake X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@HIDDEN> Cc: 8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 8099-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B8099.129881398427988 (code B ref 8099); Sun, 27 Feb 2011 13:40:02 +0000 Received: (at 8099) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2011 13:39:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1Ptgqc-0007HN-PP for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 08:39:43 -0500 Received: from exprod7og112.obsmtp.com ([64.18.2.177]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <rrt@HIDDEN>) id 1Ptgqa-0007HA-5L for 8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 08:39:41 -0500 Received: from source ([209.85.210.51]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob112.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTWpUFY551WDy1e2Id7ZDRyez0wyx2ogv@HIDDEN; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 05:39:40 PST Received: by pzk34 with SMTP id 34so515830pzk.10 for <8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 05:39:33 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.128.1 with SMTP id a1mr3364893wfd.234.1298813971566; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 05:39:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.199.21 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 05:39:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20110227065349.GE16255@HIDDEN> References: <AANLkTimXGR7agwnXZ07UqbE0UfjP9UwdVAGD2Ogr8Ptt@HIDDEN> <20110227065349.GE16255@HIDDEN> Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 13:39:31 +0000 Message-ID: <AANLkTik6eiDLJ=rfXLzjwQwndh2ZrRQGUaAV4q8OT1f+@mail.gmail.com> From: Reuben Thomas <rrt@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -6.3 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/pipermail/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.3 (------) On 27 February 2011 06:53, Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@HIDDEN> wrote: > Anyway, the next step to pursue this would be to think hard about the > desired semantics, The tricky part here is that latexmk does its own dependency finding. Hence, in my example rules I only list the root file for each document. I suppose that what one would want is something like the makedepends support one gets from a C compiler, so that the dependencies could be extracted by automake and included in the makefile automatically? -- http://rrt.sc3d.org
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#8099: LaTeX and automake Resent-From: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-automake@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 14:43:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.8099.B8099.1298817780769 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8099 X-GNU-PR-Package: automake X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Reuben Thomas <rrt@HIDDEN> Cc: 8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 8099-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B8099.1298817780769 (code B ref 8099); Sun, 27 Feb 2011 14:43:02 +0000 Received: (at 8099) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2011 14:43:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1Pthps-0000CM-91 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 09:43:00 -0500 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <Ralf.Wildenhues@HIDDEN>) id 1Pthpe-0000Bv-O4 for 8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 09:42:59 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2011 14:42:40 -0000 Received: from xdsl-78-35-54-30.netcologne.de (EHLO localhost.localdomain) [78.35.54.30] by mail.gmx.net (mp069) with SMTP; 27 Feb 2011 15:42:40 +0100 X-Authenticated: #13673931 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18458YaP5A4y3zJ+ODlWuw0o/x8X9ryhxc9yXkDzC 1EPY9mZQmPSu0j Received: from ralf by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <Ralf.Wildenhues@HIDDEN>) id 1PthpH-0005PN-16; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 15:42:23 +0100 Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 15:42:23 +0100 From: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <20110227144222.GB20761@HIDDEN> References: <AANLkTimXGR7agwnXZ07UqbE0UfjP9UwdVAGD2Ogr8Ptt@HIDDEN> <20110227065349.GE16255@HIDDEN> <AANLkTik6eiDLJ=rfXLzjwQwndh2ZrRQGUaAV4q8OT1f+@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik6eiDLJ=rfXLzjwQwndh2ZrRQGUaAV4q8OT1f+@mail.gmail.com> Organization: Institute for Numerical Simulation, University of Bonn User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-08-04) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: -3.2 (---) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/pipermail/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.2 (---) * Reuben Thomas wrote on Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 02:39:31PM CET: > On 27 February 2011 06:53, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > Anyway, the next step to pursue this would be to think hard about the > > desired semantics, > > The tricky part here is that latexmk does its own dependency finding. Well yes. Also, as you already mentioned, latex semantics don't really fit a directed graph where the nodes are files; rather, it needs a more complex diagram of states of sets of files. I don't think trying to map that to portable make would be a worthwhile endeavor, given that latexmk already exists. I think we should just try to find rules that are safe in the sense of: they call out to latexmk when needed, and not too often when it is not needed. > Hence, in my example rules I only list the root file for each > document. Right. But that will fail to do TRT when you then go and edit another file which becomes part of the document. > I suppose that what one would want is something like the makedepends > support one gets from a C compiler, so that the dependencies could be > extracted by automake and included in the makefile automatically? That could be an improvement. Or, as a first step, just calling latexmk every time. Does it do anything if files are up to date? Do you happen to know if latexmk works with pgfplots? Thanks, Ralf
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#8099: LaTeX and automake Resent-From: Reuben Thomas <rrt@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-automake@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.8099.B8099.129885356430573 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8099 X-GNU-PR-Package: automake X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@HIDDEN> Cc: 8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 8099-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B8099.129885356430573 (code B ref 8099); Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:40:02 +0000 Received: (at 8099) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Feb 2011 00:39:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1Ptr91-0007x4-B3 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 19:39:23 -0500 Received: from exprod7og120.obsmtp.com ([64.18.2.18]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <rrt@HIDDEN>) id 1Ptr8y-0007wr-JH for 8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 19:39:21 -0500 Received: from source ([209.85.210.50]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob120.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTWrushsy8GxL8PpADjwz5tdyl46tRdCk@HIDDEN; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 16:39:20 PST Received: by pzk5 with SMTP id 5so736939pzk.23 for <8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 16:39:13 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.242.9 with SMTP id p9mr3801983wfh.291.1298853553493; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 16:39:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.199.21 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 16:39:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20110227144222.GB20761@HIDDEN> References: <AANLkTimXGR7agwnXZ07UqbE0UfjP9UwdVAGD2Ogr8Ptt@HIDDEN> <20110227065349.GE16255@HIDDEN> <AANLkTik6eiDLJ=rfXLzjwQwndh2ZrRQGUaAV4q8OT1f+@mail.gmail.com> <20110227144222.GB20761@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:39:13 +0000 Message-ID: <AANLkTinD6VNBy=cE-_jFjkyt2xpUmRL7DtAw0o=qFx9F@HIDDEN> From: Reuben Thomas <rrt@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -6.3 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/pipermail/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.3 (------) On 27 February 2011 14:42, Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@HIDDEN> wrote: > > Well yes. =A0Also, as you already mentioned, latex semantics don't really > fit a directed graph where the nodes are files; rather, it needs a more > complex diagram of states of sets of files. =A0I don't think trying to ma= p > that to portable make would be a worthwhile endeavor, given that latexmk > already exists. =A0I think we should just try to find rules that are safe > in the sense of: they call out to latexmk when needed, and not too often > when it is not needed. So I was thinking, latexmk could output a list of dependent files for a given root file, and Make simply calls latexmk when any of them changes. > That could be an improvement. =A0Or, as a first step, just calling latexm= k > every time. =A0Does it do anything if files are up to date? No, which is a good start! > Do you happen to know if latexmk works with pgfplots? It doesn't seem to know about it. --=20 http://rrt.sc3d.org
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#8099: LaTeX and automake Resent-From: Reuben Thomas <rrt@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-automake@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 14:26:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.8099.B8099.129890312012735 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8099 X-GNU-PR-Package: automake X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@HIDDEN> Cc: 8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 8099-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B8099.129890312012735 (code B ref 8099); Mon, 28 Feb 2011 14:26:02 +0000 Received: (at 8099) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Feb 2011 14:25:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1Pu42C-0003JG-L5 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 09:25:20 -0500 Received: from exprod7og127.obsmtp.com ([64.18.2.210]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <rrt@HIDDEN>) id 1Pu429-0003Ip-Ry for 8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 09:25:11 -0500 Received: from source ([209.85.210.48]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob127.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTWuwOlquuORrmQ1rNdD7H8jF2K3Lwd/8@HIDDEN; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 06:25:09 PST Received: by mail-pz0-f48.google.com with SMTP id 28so805984pzk.21 for <8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 06:24:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.128.1 with SMTP id a1mr4331418wfd.234.1298903097658; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 06:24:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.199.21 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 06:24:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinD6VNBy=cE-_jFjkyt2xpUmRL7DtAw0o=qFx9F@HIDDEN> References: <AANLkTimXGR7agwnXZ07UqbE0UfjP9UwdVAGD2Ogr8Ptt@HIDDEN> <20110227065349.GE16255@HIDDEN> <AANLkTik6eiDLJ=rfXLzjwQwndh2ZrRQGUaAV4q8OT1f+@mail.gmail.com> <20110227144222.GB20761@HIDDEN> <AANLkTinD6VNBy=cE-_jFjkyt2xpUmRL7DtAw0o=qFx9F@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 14:24:57 +0000 Message-ID: <AANLkTinH7Y0du5q01KDuS1Ou2LQMgQypduFWN5==0j51@HIDDEN> From: Reuben Thomas <rrt@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -6.3 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/pipermail/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----) Update: I've written to John to ask about copyright assignment, but discovered in the mean time that there are one or two other authors to talk to. I will see what John says first before considering how to proceed. I have also butchered the current version of latexmk to remove all the functionality automake doesn't need (previewing, printing, and various types of customisation, some other cruft). This has reduced the LOC (counted with cloc, so actual code) from 3,724 to 2,916 lines. The down side is that this is still long, and there seems to be a fair amount of cruft. The upside is that this is very well commented code (2,000 lines of comment for the remaining 3,000 lines of ocde). There are a lot of notes about bits of doubtful code that should also ideally be checked and sorted out. If it sounds like an advantage to have a butchered version even without a copyright assignment (i.e. a fork which is designed for integration with make rather than interactive use), then I'd be happy to publish it. If not, then I'll wait until I work out the story on copyright assignment, but keep using my butchered version in the mean time. -- http://rrt.sc3d.org
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#8099: LaTeX and automake Resent-From: Reuben Thomas <rrt@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-automake@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 14:40:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.8099.B8099.129890396313969 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8099 X-GNU-PR-Package: automake X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@HIDDEN> Cc: 8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 8099-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B8099.129890396313969 (code B ref 8099); Mon, 28 Feb 2011 14:40:03 +0000 Received: (at 8099) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Feb 2011 14:39:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1Pu4Fu-0003dG-An for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 09:39:22 -0500 Received: from exprod7og118.obsmtp.com ([64.18.2.8]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <rrt@HIDDEN>) id 1Pu4Fr-0003d4-Us for 8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 09:39:21 -0500 Received: from source ([209.85.212.180]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob118.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTWuzkQnurHMvi9UmIXAP9BKCVtoctyJy@HIDDEN; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 06:39:19 PST Received: by pxi10 with SMTP id 10so897213pxi.11 for <8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 06:39:13 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.239.11 with SMTP id m11mr4384003wfh.120.1298903953549; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 06:39:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.199.21 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 06:39:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinH7Y0du5q01KDuS1Ou2LQMgQypduFWN5==0j51@HIDDEN> References: <AANLkTimXGR7agwnXZ07UqbE0UfjP9UwdVAGD2Ogr8Ptt@HIDDEN> <20110227065349.GE16255@HIDDEN> <AANLkTik6eiDLJ=rfXLzjwQwndh2ZrRQGUaAV4q8OT1f+@mail.gmail.com> <20110227144222.GB20761@HIDDEN> <AANLkTinD6VNBy=cE-_jFjkyt2xpUmRL7DtAw0o=qFx9F@HIDDEN> <AANLkTinH7Y0du5q01KDuS1Ou2LQMgQypduFWN5==0j51@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 14:39:13 +0000 Message-ID: <AANLkTind_jJFtMm9G9MuV99kgY0UCS=kgZNP3ZdU=FB=@mail.gmail.com> From: Reuben Thomas <rrt@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -6.3 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/pipermail/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.3 (------) By the way, before getting all excited about programming, maybe I could just write some additional documentation for automake recommending the use of latexmk and giving an example Makefile.am fragment?
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#8099: LaTeX and automake References: <AANLkTimXGR7agwnXZ07UqbE0UfjP9UwdVAGD2Ogr8Ptt@HIDDEN> Resent-From: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-automake@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 20:45:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.8099.B8099.129892584418712 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8099 X-GNU-PR-Package: automake X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Reuben Thomas <rrt@HIDDEN> Cc: 8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 8099-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B8099.129892584418712 (code B ref 8099); Mon, 28 Feb 2011 20:45:03 +0000 Received: (at 8099) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Feb 2011 20:44:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1Pu9wp-0004rl-CO for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 15:44:03 -0500 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <Ralf.Wildenhues@HIDDEN>) id 1Pu9wm-0004rC-QR for 8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 15:44:01 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2011 20:43:54 -0000 Received: from xdsl-89-0-148-31.netcologne.de (EHLO localhost.localdomain) [89.0.148.31] by mail.gmx.net (mp016) with SMTP; 28 Feb 2011 21:43:54 +0100 X-Authenticated: #13673931 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/rvNsX8ePrJHPlEkdoiTeec9/u+A9OaFbZMsEUf7 shbdAUrEoGr/Qv Received: from ralf by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <Ralf.Wildenhues@HIDDEN>) id 1Pu9wL-00020j-Pt; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 21:43:33 +0100 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 21:43:33 +0100 From: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <20110228204333.GB29860@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <AANLkTind_jJFtMm9G9MuV99kgY0UCS=kgZNP3ZdU=FB=@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinH7Y0du5q01KDuS1Ou2LQMgQypduFWN5==0j51@HIDDEN> Organization: Institute for Numerical Simulation, University of Bonn User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-08-04) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/pipermail/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) Hi Reuben, * Reuben Thomas wrote on Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 03:24:57PM CET: > Update: I've written to John to ask about copyright assignment, but > discovered in the mean time that there are one or two other authors to > talk to. I will see what John says first before considering how to > proceed. I'm not sure if I said it before; but I wouldn't be surprised if there is interest to let latexmk (continue to) exist independently from Automake. Not all users of the former are likely to be using the latter also. It's not even clear how big the benefit of a merge would be; at least to me it is not yet. * Reuben Thomas wrote on Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 03:39:13PM CET: > By the way, before getting all excited about programming, maybe I > could just write some additional documentation for automake > recommending the use of latexmk and giving an example Makefile.am > fragment? Not just that. You (or we) should be thinking hard about desired semantics first. And a small part of that is showing how example rules would look like: both what you'd use now, without automake, and also what you'd like to be using with automake support, and also what automake would then generate for you. Installation and distribution semantics are next. The code that comes from this can then be written as new tests, and the rest as documentation patch. Thanks, Ralf
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#8099: LaTeX and automake Resent-From: Reuben Thomas <rrt@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-automake@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 21:09:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.8099.B8099.129892728420706 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8099 X-GNU-PR-Package: automake X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@HIDDEN> Cc: 8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 8099-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B8099.129892728420706 (code B ref 8099); Mon, 28 Feb 2011 21:09:01 +0000 Received: (at 8099) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Feb 2011 21:08:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1PuAK4-0005Nv-5R for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 16:08:04 -0500 Received: from exprod7og117.obsmtp.com ([64.18.2.6]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <rrt@HIDDEN>) id 1PuAK1-0005NN-3G for 8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 16:08:02 -0500 Received: from source ([209.85.212.177]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob117.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTWwOp+JZhJRBTBYmNepWEUIZewWYeJf2@HIDDEN; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:08:00 PST Received: by pxi10 with SMTP id 10so767339pxi.8 for <8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:07:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.200.17 with SMTP id x17mr4698246wff.177.1298927237382; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:07:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.199.21 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:07:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20110228204333.GB29860@HIDDEN> References: <AANLkTind_jJFtMm9G9MuV99kgY0UCS=kgZNP3ZdU=FB=@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinH7Y0du5q01KDuS1Ou2LQMgQypduFWN5==0j51@HIDDEN> <20110228204333.GB29860@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 21:07:17 +0000 Message-ID: <AANLkTikN7msGtgSEJaxMS6uBHMAxuWncG7Xu_CxdszYL@HIDDEN> From: Reuben Thomas <rrt@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -6.3 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/pipermail/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.3 (------) On 28 February 2011 20:43, Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@HIDDEN> wrote: > Hi Reuben, > > > I'm not sure if I said it before; but I wouldn't be surprised if there > is interest to let latexmk (continue to) exist independently from > Automake. That's what I was assuming. > =A0It's not even clear how big the benefit of a merge would be; at > least to me it is not yet. It's more that I suspect given how big and crufty it is, automake would want its own version that we could make smaller and less crufty, including getting rid of functionality that is irrelevant to automake, as I already discussed. > Not just that. =A0You (or we) should be thinking hard about desired > semantics first. =A0And a small part of that is showing how example > rules would look like: both what you'd use now, without automake, > and also what you'd like to be using with automake support, and > also what automake would then generate for you. I already exhibited examples of what I use now and what I would like to see. To progress really needs more use cases. --=20 http://rrt.sc3d.org
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#8099: LaTeX and automake Resent-From: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-automake@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 22:13:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.8099.B8099.129910396019229 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8099 X-GNU-PR-Package: automake X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Reuben Thomas <rrt@HIDDEN> Cc: 8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 8099-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B8099.129910396019229 (code B ref 8099); Wed, 02 Mar 2011 22:13:01 +0000 Received: (at 8099) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Mar 2011 22:12:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1PuuHf-000506-US for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 17:12:40 -0500 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <Ralf.Wildenhues@HIDDEN>) id 1PuuHd-0004zt-49 for 8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 17:12:38 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 02 Mar 2011 22:12:30 -0000 Received: from xdsl-89-0-184-55.netcologne.de (EHLO localhost.localdomain) [89.0.184.55] by mail.gmx.net (mp068) with SMTP; 02 Mar 2011 23:12:30 +0100 X-Authenticated: #13673931 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19/hLJDhcF/4Iy4J/4cOxR3EbvXAIdCBgz5sqZkdk ZSSjXG8FgQrtMo Received: from ralf by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <Ralf.Wildenhues@HIDDEN>) id 1PuuH5-0005Km-7l; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 23:12:03 +0100 Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 23:12:03 +0100 From: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <20110302221203.GH18183@HIDDEN> References: <AANLkTind_jJFtMm9G9MuV99kgY0UCS=kgZNP3ZdU=FB=@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinH7Y0du5q01KDuS1Ou2LQMgQypduFWN5==0j51@HIDDEN> <20110228204333.GB29860@HIDDEN> <AANLkTikN7msGtgSEJaxMS6uBHMAxuWncG7Xu_CxdszYL@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikN7msGtgSEJaxMS6uBHMAxuWncG7Xu_CxdszYL@HIDDEN> Organization: Institute for Numerical Simulation, University of Bonn User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-08-04) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/pipermail/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) I just learned about rubber which also aims to deal with latex documents. Have you looked at it yet? Thanks, Ralf
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#8099: LaTeX and automake Resent-From: Reuben Thomas <rrt@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-automake@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 22:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.8099.B8099.129910401919332 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8099 X-GNU-PR-Package: automake X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@HIDDEN> Cc: 8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 8099-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B8099.129910401919332 (code B ref 8099); Wed, 02 Mar 2011 22:14:02 +0000 Received: (at 8099) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Mar 2011 22:13:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1PuuId-00051l-9g for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 17:13:39 -0500 Received: from exprod7og121.obsmtp.com ([64.18.2.20]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <rrt@HIDDEN>) id 1PuuIa-00051X-IX for 8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 17:13:37 -0500 Received: from source ([209.85.210.50]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob121.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTW7BCi48VG0Tsy210YtJXtdolXOYI93i@HIDDEN; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 14:13:36 PST Received: by pzk5 with SMTP id 5so59885pzk.9 for <8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 14:13:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.239.11 with SMTP id m11mr213352wfh.120.1299104008346; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 14:13:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.199.21 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 14:13:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20110302221203.GH18183@HIDDEN> References: <AANLkTind_jJFtMm9G9MuV99kgY0UCS=kgZNP3ZdU=FB=@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinH7Y0du5q01KDuS1Ou2LQMgQypduFWN5==0j51@HIDDEN> <20110228204333.GB29860@HIDDEN> <AANLkTikN7msGtgSEJaxMS6uBHMAxuWncG7Xu_CxdszYL@HIDDEN> <20110302221203.GH18183@HIDDEN> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 22:13:28 +0000 Message-ID: <AANLkTim295ooJaL+CuOKj_ax4AtWtVQ+L1hQyiKpwFQ-@mail.gmail.com> From: Reuben Thomas <rrt@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -6.3 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/pipermail/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.3 (------) On 2 March 2011 22:12, Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@HIDDEN> wrote: > I just learned about rubber which also aims to deal with latex documents. > Have you looked at it yet? No, I will do so. -- http://rrt.sc3d.org
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#8099: LaTeX and automake Resent-From: Reuben Thomas <rrt@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-automake@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 15:43:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.8099.B8099.129916696717761 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8099 X-GNU-PR-Package: automake X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@HIDDEN> Cc: 8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 8099-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B8099.129916696717761 (code B ref 8099); Thu, 03 Mar 2011 15:43:01 +0000 Received: (at 8099) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Mar 2011 15:42:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1PvAfu-0004cQ-LJ for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 10:42:46 -0500 Received: from exprod7og112.obsmtp.com ([64.18.2.177]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <rrt@HIDDEN>) id 1PvAft-0004cE-43 for 8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 10:42:46 -0500 Received: from source ([209.85.161.51]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob112.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTW+27o20CarXc3JDZqnAavYq4mvm5bIn@HIDDEN; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 07:42:44 PST Received: by fxm11 with SMTP id 11so1344417fxm.24 for <8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 07:42:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.58.146 with SMTP id g18mr1652601fah.62.1299166953612; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 07:42:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.74.140 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 07:42:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim295ooJaL+CuOKj_ax4AtWtVQ+L1hQyiKpwFQ-@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTind_jJFtMm9G9MuV99kgY0UCS=kgZNP3ZdU=FB=@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinH7Y0du5q01KDuS1Ou2LQMgQypduFWN5==0j51@HIDDEN> <20110228204333.GB29860@HIDDEN> <AANLkTikN7msGtgSEJaxMS6uBHMAxuWncG7Xu_CxdszYL@HIDDEN> <20110302221203.GH18183@HIDDEN> <AANLkTim295ooJaL+CuOKj_ax4AtWtVQ+L1hQyiKpwFQ-@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 15:42:33 +0000 Message-ID: <AANLkTiktHcvqE7FtLG8VCZ6f3KujArFOOTeE3siw2uD8@HIDDEN> From: Reuben Thomas <rrt@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/pipermail/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) On 2 March 2011 22:13, Reuben Thomas <rrt@HIDDEN> wrote: > On 2 March 2011 22:12, Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@HIDDEN> wrote: >> I just learned about rubber which also aims to deal with latex documents. >> Have you looked at it yet? > > No, I will do so. Initial impressions are good: rubber is much more cleanly written than latexmk, and I can use pretty much the same automake rules with it: LATEX_SRCS = ... # top-level .tex files LATEX_PDFS = ... # top-level PDF outputs pdf-local: $(LATEX_PDFS) CLEANFILES = $(LATEX_PDFS) clean-local: $(RUBBER) --clean $(PAPER_SRCS) EXTRA_DIST = $(LATEX_SRCS) .tex.pdf: $(RUBBER) --pdf $< I distribute the PDFs, so change CLEANFILES to MAINTIANERCLEANFILES. I have not tried extracting dependency information yet, but it seems very straightforward: rubber-info --deps foo.tex gives a space-separated list of all the dependencies. So, other than worrying about filenames containing spaces (sigh), one would imagine just adding that information to the Makefile. This means, effectively, delegating the semantics of rebuilding to rubber, but that seems a reasonable starting-point. Thoughts? -- http://rrt.sc3d.org
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#8099: LaTeX and automake Resent-From: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-automake@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 17:16:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.8099.B8099.129925890330679 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8099 X-GNU-PR-Package: automake X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Reuben Thomas <rrt@HIDDEN> Cc: 8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 8099-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B8099.129925890330679 (code B ref 8099); Fri, 04 Mar 2011 17:16:01 +0000 Received: (at 8099) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Mar 2011 17:15:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1PvYal-0007ym-Im for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 12:15:03 -0500 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <Ralf.Wildenhues@HIDDEN>) id 1PvYaj-0007y3-M6 for 8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 12:15:02 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 04 Mar 2011 17:14:55 -0000 Received: from xdsl-89-0-180-85.netcologne.de (EHLO localhost.localdomain) [89.0.180.85] by mail.gmx.net (mp062) with SMTP; 04 Mar 2011 18:14:55 +0100 X-Authenticated: #13673931 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19kU8tuemxkp2Kq3EYn5APaHoqBtg1MN0vrSW36eR L3PqNGyFYV8VSW Received: from ralf by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <Ralf.Wildenhues@HIDDEN>) id 1PvYaA-0002z8-DN; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 18:14:26 +0100 Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 18:14:26 +0100 From: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <20110304171426.GJ10500@HIDDEN> References: <AANLkTind_jJFtMm9G9MuV99kgY0UCS=kgZNP3ZdU=FB=@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinH7Y0du5q01KDuS1Ou2LQMgQypduFWN5==0j51@HIDDEN> <20110228204333.GB29860@HIDDEN> <AANLkTikN7msGtgSEJaxMS6uBHMAxuWncG7Xu_CxdszYL@HIDDEN> <20110302221203.GH18183@HIDDEN> <AANLkTim295ooJaL+CuOKj_ax4AtWtVQ+L1hQyiKpwFQ-@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTiktHcvqE7FtLG8VCZ6f3KujArFOOTeE3siw2uD8@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <AANLkTiktHcvqE7FtLG8VCZ6f3KujArFOOTeE3siw2uD8@HIDDEN> Organization: Institute for Numerical Simulation, University of Bonn User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-08-04) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/pipermail/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) * Reuben Thomas wrote on Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 04:42:33PM CET: > > Thoughts? We could just provide thin-layer support for both latexmk and/or rubber. That would probably be the least amount of work, both inside Automake, and for getting any missing bits into the upstream projects. Thanks, Ralf
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#8099: LaTeX and automake Resent-From: Reuben Thomas <rrt@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-automake@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 20:46:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.8099.B8099.129927155020248 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8099 X-GNU-PR-Package: automake X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@HIDDEN> Cc: 8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 8099-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B8099.129927155020248 (code B ref 8099); Fri, 04 Mar 2011 20:46:02 +0000 Received: (at 8099) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Mar 2011 20:45:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1Pvbsk-0005GW-4G for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 15:45:50 -0500 Received: from exprod7og111.obsmtp.com ([64.18.2.175]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <rrt@HIDDEN>) id 1Pvbsh-0005GI-Il for 8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 15:45:48 -0500 Received: from source ([209.85.161.50]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob111.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTXFPdfWVPQAF2N/kmWBLpdiZytIp3y0N@HIDDEN; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 12:45:47 PST Received: by mail-fx0-f50.google.com with SMTP id 18so2322091fxm.9 for <8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 12:45:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.52.203 with SMTP id j11mr1361989fag.24.1299271518074; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 12:45:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.74.140 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 12:45:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20110304171426.GJ10500@HIDDEN> References: <AANLkTind_jJFtMm9G9MuV99kgY0UCS=kgZNP3ZdU=FB=@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinH7Y0du5q01KDuS1Ou2LQMgQypduFWN5==0j51@HIDDEN> <20110228204333.GB29860@HIDDEN> <AANLkTikN7msGtgSEJaxMS6uBHMAxuWncG7Xu_CxdszYL@HIDDEN> <20110302221203.GH18183@HIDDEN> <AANLkTim295ooJaL+CuOKj_ax4AtWtVQ+L1hQyiKpwFQ-@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTiktHcvqE7FtLG8VCZ6f3KujArFOOTeE3siw2uD8@HIDDEN> <20110304171426.GJ10500@HIDDEN> Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 20:45:18 +0000 Message-ID: <AANLkTim-EWinhEgbwK3Pti=ReHq_21ei9AjRumrn3M+x@HIDDEN> From: Reuben Thomas <rrt@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/pipermail/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) On 4 March 2011 17:14, Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@HIDDEN> wrote: > * Reuben Thomas wrote on Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 04:42:33PM CET: >> >> Thoughts? > > We could just provide thin-layer support for both latexmk and/or rubber. This sounds good, and John Collins has pointed out that latexmk does provide dependency information (not quite what we want yet, but he's willing to help fix it), and supplied some useful comparison with Rubber, suggesting that latexmk is better at ferreting out dependencies. > That would probably be the least amount of work, both inside Automake, > and for getting any missing bits into the upstream projects. Agreed. It seems that we're up to deciding what shape the automake interface should take, given that we expect a tool that supports, in the abstract: $(LATEX_MAKER) [--deps|--make|--clean] root.tex -- http://rrt.sc3d.org
Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jul 2011 13:22:30 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jul 26 09:22:29 2011 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1Qlhaf-0003WX-3R for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:22:29 -0400 Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com ([74.125.82.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <stefano.lattarini@HIDDEN>) id 1Qlhad-0003WH-GL for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:22:27 -0400 Received: by wyj26 with SMTP id 26so151724wyj.3 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 06:22:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=50IF5uWgxSoR9xlX7Y9oFzT5EIgDownlmoCwBN4URpQ=; b=RixI8XNo35RmgA2YpbtQneeKIm0u+VzN2ltZg0YIh5+Yvf1okgrhYGj9/zH6J7/vn9 fuzNSOwagqZU1crjtmsMpDzqgY25SJyAMkrn16z0XgDU3XiaIxYty7XnRg/+4JFIcry/ 1/BtQv69smDkhLd2IEPkxg0O7HmsC2cnUzGTA= Received: by 10.216.141.166 with SMTP id g38mr5427396wej.54.1311686541771; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 06:22:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bigio.localnet (host86-103-dynamic.0-87-r.retail.telecomitalia.it [87.0.103.86]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t46sm343461wec.14.2011.07.26.06.22.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 26 Jul 2011 06:22:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini@HIDDEN> To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: foo Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:22:05 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.30-2-686; KDE/4.4.4; i686; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201107261522.06591.stefano.lattarini@HIDDEN> X-Spam-Score: -3.9 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.9 (---) severity 9088 wishlist severity 8945 wishlist severity 8880 wishlist severity 8319 wishlist severity 8099 wishlist thanks
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#8099: LaTeX and automake References: <AANLkTimXGR7agwnXZ07UqbE0UfjP9UwdVAGD2Ogr8Ptt@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimXGR7agwnXZ07UqbE0UfjP9UwdVAGD2Ogr8Ptt@HIDDEN> Resent-From: Luke Dalessandro <ldalessandro@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-automake@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 19:35:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.8099.B8099.136786886025676 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8099 X-GNU-PR-Package: automake X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 8099-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B8099.136786886025676 (code B ref 8099); Mon, 06 May 2013 19:35:01 +0000 Received: (at 8099) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2013 19:34:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60182 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1UZRAy-0006g5-60 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2013 15:34:20 -0400 Received: from mail-ie0-f181.google.com ([209.85.223.181]:42026) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ldalessandro@HIDDEN>) id 1UZQsN-0005rh-41 for 8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2013 15:15:07 -0400 Received: by mail-ie0-f181.google.com with SMTP id x12so4449350ief.26 for <8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 06 May 2013 12:14:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject :message-id:date:to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=iE5hc0w+X1dWzZ556JSbiBhTWwx1RUQ11EeNM5Sfdg0=; b=QiOc5XFZYBwPsjj2pDoUo2ahIeFc7sw61/IdIL5I+0fURIn2FVpo98fg8ETY+dvQUL gfVk9bx7vqBsu+8SJWMeK92gX3BKLFQ4dUEqW2rOB7gXW/I2oC02cvSS79xBR3xAHGyz QI0FL6p/uxWGe84E6ZQv6TAtbTRPFW//szDSNbD7bstYAgOsQZFm8gjlms/aLxZb/6M4 FRPHh+y7gUAlw7bUPeD5E/1lOnxJWvkxf/Rc+32UuSeqRCI3zbuc1CRO+nreAGZUQMi6 aMFynVAuDMafotOZcy+XFxtCseK3scIgCai2ZNscnimb25n7xn5YIKCv1uATXoh6kf9G bB7g== X-Received: by 10.50.119.67 with SMTP id ks3mr3028678igb.90.1367867648199; Mon, 06 May 2013 12:14:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:18e8:2:1031:60a9:b7f1:b845:4ca4? ([2001:18e8:2:1031:60a9:b7f1:b845:4ca4]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id xf4sm3834721igb.8.2013.05.06.12.14.07 for <8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 06 May 2013 12:14:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Luke Dalessandro <ldalessandro@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <C7152718-27CF-4346-93D5-3CF6BA82B0D0@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 15:14:06 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503) X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 06 May 2013 15:34:19 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) Are there any updates on integrating either latexmk or rubber-based = builds as standard infrastructure in automake? Luke=
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#8099: LaTeX and automake Resent-From: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-automake@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 22:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.8099.B8099.136787821018560 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8099 X-GNU-PR-Package: automake X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Luke Dalessandro <ldalessandro@HIDDEN> Cc: 8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 8099-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B8099.136787821018560 (code B ref 8099); Mon, 06 May 2013 22:11:02 +0000 Received: (at 8099) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2013 22:10:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60282 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1UZTbl-0004pH-S9 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2013 18:10:10 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f43.google.com ([74.125.82.43]:56082) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <stefano.lattarini@HIDDEN>) id 1UZTbj-0004ot-Jq for 8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2013 18:10:08 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id c11so4004452wgh.10 for <8099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 06 May 2013 15:09:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/9OYpCYwAtpDi9DQuX9jdMGVjG18XcyHBNbXCLKIwXM=; b=ivI0dmpAysN4LUxt3g9icDFi+PlrSR3107mjjKJXPj1UbeojdBJDWAoNxXI+9vsJEH LEaJXJ0hKtNzd8bt3w+nG//alo1LyvbvOQ9LJdeCAQ5b6ARsrS1hqxU5pBeC85c3S+qQ +4QbtBge2LajahJH9PxeR7wI/ItQcAjORQ/nbi7wUDIUBdYsVi1KBQdy6NKkuWXec+ig WbFS2o09+jVYW3rCAmUXF263aNMVeknaN412w/rdCX+6+OwI+cbHDdw2ybJarGiEN3JI TSWZ6W55SBaFfoiHxDx+DxIXfxb8IbVPNTG1mLM2KTuO6RE4QRxkWEn0uN2nkvv1GPMZ b8QQ== X-Received: by 10.180.185.114 with SMTP id fb18mr10802732wic.33.1367878147791; Mon, 06 May 2013 15:09:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.178.20] (host93-95-dynamic.6-79-r.retail.telecomitalia.it. [79.6.95.93]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id x13sm18137757wib.3.2013.05.06.15.09.05 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 06 May 2013 15:09:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <518829FB.7000406@HIDDEN> Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 00:08:59 +0200 From: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <AANLkTimXGR7agwnXZ07UqbE0UfjP9UwdVAGD2Ogr8Ptt@HIDDEN> <C7152718-27CF-4346-93D5-3CF6BA82B0D0@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <C7152718-27CF-4346-93D5-3CF6BA82B0D0@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On 05/06/2013 09:14 PM, Luke Dalessandro wrote: > Are there any updates on integrating either latexmk or > rubber-based builds as standard infrastructure in automake? > > Luke > Attempting to write patches myself about this is not on my radar ATM, so I fear we are stuck at "patches welcome". Sorry. Regards, Stefano
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.