Received: (at 81377) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jul 2026 12:51:28 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jul 08 08:51:28 2026
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39086 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1whRkO-000517-9h
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2026 08:51:28 -0400
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]:44479)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <fweimer@HIDDEN>) id 1whRkM-00050z-F6
for 81377 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2026 08:51:27 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com;
s=mimecast20190719; t=1783515086;
h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
bh=deE/fC3pZC5gObNExRvYcGOgG4ZiW9dzKuX/DGG8Ir8=;
b=RXI8ujok33dnccmuCcZe/waca6uZzLtg+XEu0vmciVwt+hifmSBzZLT6arV4GHE8w61KZu
41EZkWxJy+P7gxbO0MpaXVsaQsJ1Eap+3+6ug/qieU1brZUmJzbtJx1fmxgmg+ARUJt5Ez
ROol/1x63T91AgNxlRzMPmeyH9DKbCU=
Received: from mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com
(ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by
relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3,
cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-645-HB7OFWwqNiuO-pqrR6AWlQ-1; Wed,
08 Jul 2026 08:51:24 -0400
X-MC-Unique: HB7OFWwqNiuO-pqrR6AWlQ-1
X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: HB7OFWwqNiuO-pqrR6AWlQ_1783515083
Received: from mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com
(mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.111])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
(No client certificate requested)
by mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS
id 521E11955F1C; Wed, 8 Jul 2026 12:51:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from fweimer-oldenburg.csb.redhat.com (unknown [10.44.48.66])
by mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS
id 4A147180066F; Wed, 8 Jul 2026 12:51:21 +0000 (UTC)
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@HIDDEN>
To: Florian Weimer via GNU coreutils Bug Reports <bug-coreutils@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#81377: mv -Tn suceeds if target directory exists, no error
printed
In-Reply-To: <lhu7bn564q8.fsf@HIDDEN> (Florian Weimer via's
message of "Wed, 08 Jul 2026 14:33:19 +0200")
References: <lhu7bn564q8.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2026 14:51:04 +0200
Message-ID: <lhuzf014pc7.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.111
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: JAoZn736NuU_aUmncgL-STHwUOrKf7hkGaJjgZB7N-0_1783515083
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 3.6 (+++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: * Florian Weimer via: > Based on the documentation, I would
have expected an error in this case. > > mkdir a a/1 b b/2 > mv -Tn a b >
> Exit status is zero. The only relevant system call in the strace output
> is this one: [...]
Content analysis details: (3.6 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust [170.10.129.124 listed in list.dnswl.org]
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS
[54.186.198.63 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3)
[170.10.129.124 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 81377
Cc: 81377 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 2.6 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: * Florian Weimer via: > Based on the documentation, I would
have expected an error in this case. > > mkdir a a/1 b b/2 > mv -Tn a b >
> Exit status is zero. The only relevant system call in the strace output
> is this one: [...]
Content analysis details: (2.6 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3)
[170.10.129.124 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS
[54.186.198.63 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust
[170.10.129.124 listed in list.dnswl.org]
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders
-1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
manager
* Florian Weimer via:
> Based on the documentation, I would have expected an error in this case.
>
> mkdir a a/1 b b/2
> mv -Tn a b
>
> Exit status is zero. The only relevant system call in the strace output
> is this one:
>
> renameat2(AT_FDCWD, "a", AT_FDCWD, "b", RENAME_NOREPLACE) =3D -1 EEXIST (=
File exists)
>
> Seen with: coreutils-9.7-9.fc43.x86_64
I see that there is a hint in the -n description that the exit status
may not be what users expects. But it means that this claim in the
manual is slightly misleading:
| However, if =E2=80=98mv -T /tmp/source /tmp/dest=E2=80=99 succeeds, there=
is no
| question that =E2=80=98/tmp/source=E2=80=99 was renamed to =E2=80=98/tmp/=
dest=E2=80=99.
Florian
bug-coreutils@HIDDEN:bug#81377; Package coreutils.
Full text available.
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jul 2026 12:51:39 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jul 08 08:51:39 2026
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39090 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1whRkY-00051u-Jl
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2026 08:51:38 -0400
Received: from lists1p.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:47288)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <fweimer@HIDDEN>)
id 1whRkV-00051K-J1
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2026 08:51:36 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
by lists1p.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <fweimer@HIDDEN>)
id 1whRkP-0003bn-Ky
for bug-coreutils@HIDDEN; Wed, 08 Jul 2026 08:51:29 -0400
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124])
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <fweimer@HIDDEN>)
id 1whRkO-00076I-Ck
for bug-coreutils@HIDDEN; Wed, 08 Jul 2026 08:51:29 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com;
s=mimecast20190719; t=1783515087;
h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
bh=deE/fC3pZC5gObNExRvYcGOgG4ZiW9dzKuX/DGG8Ir8=;
b=E4wTHYAFNtp478HzwGohYYncSDHwAt3JLR1UMTTUTZu+9WIXf54E2fGwN09xvSe0vY2w9o
gx/dUWpiAL9fIZM+1FQpIQYz3Y+CpCY9yEuyY0+xwIQdQI0NXTncSAgjC9FqJYY2bOXzZo
BA/k+FTBBqZ0PhycfXKbJOP3Q8RnW1I=
Received: from mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com
(ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by
relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3,
cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-645-HB7OFWwqNiuO-pqrR6AWlQ-1; Wed,
08 Jul 2026 08:51:24 -0400
X-MC-Unique: HB7OFWwqNiuO-pqrR6AWlQ-1
X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: HB7OFWwqNiuO-pqrR6AWlQ_1783515083
Received: from mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com
(mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.111])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
(No client certificate requested)
by mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS
id 521E11955F1C; Wed, 8 Jul 2026 12:51:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from fweimer-oldenburg.csb.redhat.com (unknown [10.44.48.66])
by mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS
id 4A147180066F; Wed, 8 Jul 2026 12:51:21 +0000 (UTC)
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@HIDDEN>
To: Florian Weimer via GNU coreutils Bug Reports <bug-coreutils@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#81377: mv -Tn suceeds if target directory exists, no error
printed
In-Reply-To: <lhu7bn564q8.fsf@HIDDEN> (Florian Weimer via's
message of "Wed, 08 Jul 2026 14:33:19 +0200")
References: <lhu7bn564q8.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2026 14:51:04 +0200
Message-ID: <lhuzf014pc7.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.111
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: ulbe5f3ZYAcEFyjOTzSpEdeGfdafurYwIPeijryEYzA_1783515083
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=fweimer@HIDDEN;
helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com
X-Spam_score_int: 8
X-Spam_score: 0.8
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: (0.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.445,
DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001,
RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: 4.5 (++++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: * Florian Weimer via: > Based on the documentation, I would
have expected an error in this case. > > mkdir a a/1 b b/2 > mv -Tn a b >
> Exit status is zero. The only relevant system call in the strace output
> is this one: [...]
Content analysis details: (4.5 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS
[54.186.198.63 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust [2001:470:142:0:0:0:0:17 listed in] [list.dnswl.org]
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
0.9 SPF_FAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail)
[SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom;
id=fweimer%40redhat.com; ip=2001%3A470%3A142%3A%3A17; r=debbugs.gnu.org]
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
Cc: 81377 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 3.5 (+++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: * Florian Weimer via: > Based on the documentation, I would
have expected an error in this case. > > mkdir a a/1 b b/2 > mv -Tn a b >
> Exit status is zero. The only relevant system call in the strace output
> is this one: [...]
Content analysis details: (3.5 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS
[54.186.198.63 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust
[2001:470:142:0:0:0:0:17 listed in]
[list.dnswl.org]
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
0.9 SPF_FAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail)
[SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom;id=fweimer%40redhat.com;ip=2001%3A470%3A142%3A%3A17;r=debbugs.gnu.org]
-1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
manager
* Florian Weimer via:
> Based on the documentation, I would have expected an error in this case.
>
> mkdir a a/1 b b/2
> mv -Tn a b
>
> Exit status is zero. The only relevant system call in the strace output
> is this one:
>
> renameat2(AT_FDCWD, "a", AT_FDCWD, "b", RENAME_NOREPLACE) =3D -1 EEXIST (=
File exists)
>
> Seen with: coreutils-9.7-9.fc43.x86_64
I see that there is a hint in the -n description that the exit status
may not be what users expects. But it means that this claim in the
manual is slightly misleading:
| However, if =E2=80=98mv -T /tmp/source /tmp/dest=E2=80=99 succeeds, there=
is no
| question that =E2=80=98/tmp/source=E2=80=99 was renamed to =E2=80=98/tmp/=
dest=E2=80=99.
Florian
bug-coreutils@HIDDEN:bug#81377; Package coreutils.
Full text available.
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jul 2026 12:33:54 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jul 08 08:33:54 2026
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38898 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1whRTN-0003Si-SD
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2026 08:33:54 -0400
Received: from lists1p.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:47958)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <fweimer@HIDDEN>)
id 1whRTL-0003S4-0a
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2026 08:33:52 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
by lists1p.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <fweimer@HIDDEN>)
id 1whRTE-0000WI-BT
for bug-coreutils@HIDDEN; Wed, 08 Jul 2026 08:33:45 -0400
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124])
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <fweimer@HIDDEN>)
id 1whRTC-0001D8-HC
for bug-coreutils@HIDDEN; Wed, 08 Jul 2026 08:33:43 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com;
s=mimecast20190719; t=1783514020;
h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type;
bh=stt1p9MM2NF/55u1ozhE5fiPj3xRZgJ4kG/Z8VgFVc0=;
b=Ntm6iGfrYsY0O4h0FwMQ5DVvj13QMp+JAYpTQCYscWJPKsy3XAwtR2U4n34Enc0hvXzvTV
C6cfAyjFooEX0TzJJz6s0oajY0JEgklhLngJ6su8D8u+C8sdAnLPND048iJh0cqEtn1iUM
2lZuEAtKi9DMSpiMyCBKOpaE/wHcucc=
Received: from mx-prod-mc-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com
(ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by
relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3,
cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-349-3R0Hq-WGO16yRxP0PQKi2A-1; Wed,
08 Jul 2026 08:33:39 -0400
X-MC-Unique: 3R0Hq-WGO16yRxP0PQKi2A-1
X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: 3R0Hq-WGO16yRxP0PQKi2A_1783514018
Received: from mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com
(mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.17])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
(No client certificate requested)
by mx-prod-mc-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS
id 02A1519540C6
for <bug-coreutils@HIDDEN>; Wed, 8 Jul 2026 12:33:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from fweimer-oldenburg.csb.redhat.com (unknown [10.44.48.66])
by mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS
id 3B4B31955D86
for <bug-coreutils@HIDDEN>; Wed, 8 Jul 2026 12:33:36 +0000 (UTC)
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@HIDDEN>
To: bug-coreutils@HIDDEN
Subject: mv -Tn suceeds if target directory exists, no error printed
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2026 14:33:19 +0200
Message-ID: <lhu7bn564q8.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.17
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: rFDn8Zp8dKnrg0Sz-WVytAvXWLGpYGov-ia8CqycwOw_1783514018
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=fweimer@HIDDEN;
helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com
X-Spam_score_int: 8
X-Spam_score: 0.8
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: (0.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.445,
DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001,
RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: 4.5 (++++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Based on the documentation, I would have expected an error
in this case. mkdir a a/1 b b/2 mv -Tn a b Exit status is zero. The only
relevant system call in the strace output is this one:
Content analysis details: (4.5 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust [2001:470:142:0:0:0:0:17 listed in] [list.dnswl.org]
3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS
[54.186.198.63 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
0.9 SPF_FAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail)
[SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom;
id=fweimer%40redhat.com; ip=2001%3A470%3A142%3A%3A17; r=debbugs.gnu.org]
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 3.5 (+++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Based on the documentation, I would have expected an error
in this case. mkdir a a/1 b b/2 mv -Tn a b Exit status is zero. The only
relevant system call in the strace output is this one:
Content analysis details: (3.5 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS
[54.186.198.63 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust
[2001:470:142:0:0:0:0:17 listed in]
[list.dnswl.org]
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
0.9 SPF_FAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail)
[SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom;id=fweimer%40redhat.com;ip=2001%3A470%3A142%3A%3A17;r=debbugs.gnu.org]
-1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
manager
Based on the documentation, I would have expected an error in this case.
mkdir a a/1 b b/2
mv -Tn a b
Exit status is zero. The only relevant system call in the strace output
is this one:
renameat2(AT_FDCWD, "a", AT_FDCWD, "b", RENAME_NOREPLACE) = -1 EEXIST (File exists)
Seen with: coreutils-9.7-9.fc43.x86_64
Thanks,
Florian
Florian Weimer <fweimer@HIDDEN>:bug-coreutils@HIDDEN.
Full text available.bug-coreutils@HIDDEN:bug#81377; Package coreutils.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.