GNU logs - #8976, boring messages


Message sent to owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-libtool@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#8976: documentation / behavior discrepancy with lt_dlopenext
Resent-From: Andy Wingo <wingo@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Resent-To: owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Resent-CC: bug-libtool@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 16:17:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.8976.B.13095369691644 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: report 8976
X-GNU-PR-Package: libtool
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: 8976 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: bug-guile@HIDDEN
X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-libtool@HIDDEN
Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.13095369691644
          (code B ref -1); Fri, 01 Jul 2011 16:17:01 +0000
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jul 2011 16:16:09 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1QcgNz-0000QR-6r
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 12:16:08 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92])
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <wingo@HIDDEN>) id 1QcfFg-0007GM-92
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:03:29 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <wingo@HIDDEN>) id 1QcfFZ-0008Kz-Bt
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:03:22 -0400
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, 
	T_DKIM_INVALID,
	T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:57382)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <wingo@HIDDEN>) id 1QcfFY-0008Kp-S6
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:03:21 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46282)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <wingo@HIDDEN>) id 1QcfFV-0001MH-J5
	for bug-libtool@HIDDEN; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:03:20 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <wingo@HIDDEN>) id 1QcfFT-0008JH-GB
	for bug-libtool@HIDDEN; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:03:17 -0400
Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:48319
	helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <wingo@HIDDEN>)
	id 1QcfFN-0008Ha-Rn; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:03:10 -0400
Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
	by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE615D06;
	Fri,  1 Jul 2011 11:05:23 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc
	:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=UMKBtQOYoY+p
	A9F7SAMBIoHjSdY=; b=Ugj5COR+l4Mjvk7JwDNN8rmhDdHI5KNZB1Nf0xZHapSS
	e5l5DyBXfR3ZG0oVW6AeBJczPyyhQIdHAzrcV/7mAbRuErcbYiOe9sVPN+Zbtbsv
	O0T/bN/51ikOJvYIinDvz5VE1TOo9fNIbHAZWgFWvP9fFfGnsVLVTsG0rBUWsKA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc
	:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=lKFq78
	oUs7/tn6dFVrLQyS41E8f+K4l/uzWof188gtK7TxKeE5V3qV+1gUl8tjLgZlzBWH
	Nc0T65Ny+wwuCMgKqaSdV4K1tie1WbvCf/1BJ71+RHfixIAZcgF04Z9/2Zj30sOE
	cQtgrfbdykjvpvQBE01uj0izdDlYuaKKAOrd4=
Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
	by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 208D05D05;
	Fri,  1 Jul 2011 11:05:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from badger (unknown [95.21.56.70]) (using TLSv1 with cipher
	DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by
	a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 29CEF5D04;
	Fri,  1 Jul 2011 11:05:22 -0400 (EDT)
From: Andy Wingo <wingo@HIDDEN>
References: <m3oc4s1q7d.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 17:03:03 +0200
In-Reply-To: <m3oc4s1q7d.fsf@HIDDEN> (Andy Wingo's message of
	"Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:19:18 +0200")
Message-ID: <87iprm6o2g.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 8ADBD630-A3F3-11E0-A387-5875C023C68D-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3)
X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17
X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 12:16:06 -0400
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
	<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/pipermail/debbugs-submit>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
	<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----)

Hi list,

Re-sending this report, now that you have debbugs.

On Wed 30 Mar 2011 19:19, Andy Wingo <wingo@HIDDEN> writes:

> The ltdl docs say:
>
>     =E2=80=94 Function: lt_dlhandle lt_dlopenext (const char *filename)
>
>         The same as lt_dlopen, except that it tries to append different f=
ile
>         name extensions to the file name. If the file with the file name
>         FILENAME cannot be found libltdl tries to append the following
>         extensions: [...]
>
> However, there are cases in which lt_dlopenext does not look for a bare
> filename.  Specifically the code does:
>
>       if (!filename
>           || !advise
>           || !advise->try_ext
>           || has_library_ext (filename))
>         try the bare file
>       else if (filename && *filename)
>         try extensions...
>
> So, we see that if has_library_ext is FALSE, we don't try the bare
> file.  But that check fails for full paths, like
> "/usr/lib64/libSDL-1.2.so.0.11.3".
>
>     $ strace guile -c '(dynamic-link "/usr/lib64/libSDL-1.2.so.0.11.3")'
>     [...]
>     open("/usr/lib64/libSDL-1.2.so.0.11.3.la", O_RDONLY) =3D -1 ENOENT (N=
o such file or directory)
>     open("/usr/lib64/libSDL-1.2.so.0.11.3.so", O_RDONLY) =3D -1 ENOENT (N=
o such file or directory)
>     [...]
>
> The documentation and the code do not agree.  I propose that we fix the
> code, to add another `stat' (I know) -- of the bare file name, before
> trying to add extensions, in the dlopenext case.
>
> What do you think?

The original discussion was here:

  http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.bugs/5387

Any ideas? :-)

Andy
--=20
http://wingolog.org/




Message sent:


Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Andy Wingo <wingo@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#8976: Acknowledgement (documentation / behavior discrepancy
 with lt_dlopenext)
Message-ID: <handler.8976.B.13095369691644.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <87iprm6o2g.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 8976
X-Gnu-PR-Package: libtool
Reply-To: 8976 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 16:17:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with GNU.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-libtool@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 8976 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
8976: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D8976
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems



Last modified: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 12:00:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.