GNU logs - #9034, boring messages

Message sent to owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#9034: point adjustment after `end-of-visual-line' moves to the next line
Resent-From: Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Resent-To: owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 13:05:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.9034.B.131021666227208 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 9034 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-321-g41686e2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
	(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 17:04:05 +0400
Message-ID: <87iprb38sa.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Precedence: list
Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org

Package: emacs
Version: 24.0.50

If a line ends with invisible text, point adjustment moves to the next
line after `end-of-visual-line'.  To reproduce run:

  (progn (switch-to-buffer "test")
         (insert "aline1\nbline2\ncline3\n")
         (put-text-property 7 14 'invisible t) ; region [\nbline2]
         (goto-char (point-min)))

After that in the test buffer do M-: (progn (end-of-visual-line)
(point)).  `end-of-visual-line' moves point to position 14 as expected.
But after that the point is adjusted to position 15, as can be checked
by C-x =.

Sometimes the point is not adjusted to position 15 the first time you
run `end-of-visual-line'.  But it is if you run it more than once.
Perhaps it is related to the last point position.

It is definitely happens because of point adjustment, setting
global-disable-point-adjustment to non-nil fixes the problem.

Also, `move-end-of-line` always behaves correctly, so it it something
specific to `end-of-visual-line' or `vertical-motion'.

The issue was originally reported on the emacs-devel ML [1].

Regards,
  Dmitry

[1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2011-07/msg00255.html

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#9034: Acknowledgement (point adjustment after `end-of-visual-line'
 moves to the next line)
Message-ID: <handler.9034.B.131021666227208.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <87iprb38sa.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 9034
X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs
Reply-To: 9034 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 13:05:01 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with GNU.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 9034 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
9034: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D9034
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message sent to owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#9034: point adjustment after `end-of-visual-line' moves to the next line
Resent-From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Resent-To: owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 04:17:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.9034.B9034.1310357802967 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@HIDDEN>
Cc: 9034 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <jwvtyato3lq.fsf-monnier+emacs@HIDDEN>
References: <87iprb38sa.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 00:16:31 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87iprb38sa.fsf@HIDDEN> (Dmitry Kurochkin's message of "Sat,
	09 Jul 2011 17:04:05 +0400")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: list
Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org

> If a line ends with invisible text, point adjustment moves to the next
> line after `end-of-visual-line'.  To reproduce run:

>   (progn (switch-to-buffer "test")
>          (insert "aline1\nbline2\ncline3\n")
>          (put-text-property 7 14 'invisible t) ; region [\nbline2]
>          (goto-char (point-min)))

> After that in the test buffer do M-: (progn (end-of-visual-line)
> (point)).  `end-of-visual-line' moves point to position 14 as expected.
> But after that the point is adjusted to position 15, as can be checked
> by C-x =.

> Sometimes the point is not adjusted to position 15 the first time you
> run `end-of-visual-line'.  But it is if you run it more than once.
> Perhaps it is related to the last point position.

I can reproduce it with M-: (progn (goto-char 14) > (point))

> Also, `move-end-of-line` always behaves correctly, so it it something
> specific to `end-of-visual-line' or `vertical-motion'.

Apparently not since I can reproduce the problem with just goto-char.
Maybe it has to do with the use of M-: instead.


        Stefan

Message sent to owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#9034: point adjustment after `end-of-visual-line' moves to the next line
Resent-From: Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Resent-To: owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 08:28:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.9034.B9034.131037285522445 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Cc: 9034 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <jwvtyato3lq.fsf-monnier+emacs@HIDDEN>
References: <87iprb38sa.fsf@HIDDEN> <jwvtyato3lq.fsf-monnier+emacs@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-321-g41686e2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
	(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 12:27:18 +0400
Message-ID: <87tyat1au1.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Precedence: list
Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org

On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 00:16:31 -0400, Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN> wrote:
> > If a line ends with invisible text, point adjustment moves to the next
> > line after `end-of-visual-line'.  To reproduce run:
> 
> >   (progn (switch-to-buffer "test")
> >          (insert "aline1\nbline2\ncline3\n")
> >          (put-text-property 7 14 'invisible t) ; region [\nbline2]
> >          (goto-char (point-min)))
> 
> > After that in the test buffer do M-: (progn (end-of-visual-line)
> > (point)).  `end-of-visual-line' moves point to position 14 as expected.
> > But after that the point is adjusted to position 15, as can be checked
> > by C-x =.
> 
> > Sometimes the point is not adjusted to position 15 the first time you
> > run `end-of-visual-line'.  But it is if you run it more than once.
> > Perhaps it is related to the last point position.
> 
> I can reproduce it with M-: (progn (goto-char 14) > (point))
> 

indeed

> > Also, `move-end-of-line` always behaves correctly, so it it something
> > specific to `end-of-visual-line' or `vertical-motion'.
> 
> Apparently not since I can reproduce the problem with just goto-char.

If visual-line-mode is enabled (so that C-e is mapped to
`end-of-visual-line' instead of `move-end-of-line'),
`end-of-visual-line' works correctly when run with C-e.

> Maybe it has to do with the use of M-: instead.
> 

Seems plausible.

Regards,
  Dmitry

> 
>         Stefan

Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Mar 2017 01:35:39 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Mar 24 21:35:39 2017
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42972 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1cracE-0004b5-VH
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 21:35:39 -0400
Received: from mail-it0-f48.google.com ([209.85.214.48]:37039)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <npostavs@HIDDEN>) id 1cracD-0004as-Bl
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 21:35:37 -0400
Received: by mail-it0-f48.google.com with SMTP id 190so6738038itm.0
 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 18:35:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version;
 bh=5tIZd37HGyHuyYbBcfqL4P5pukf4oxWijzLM+YKdzZ8=;
 b=soI1tYcnFHgGDqeANutqgG37CGeP8uAva2lFSrZbS9uDI2eSj9Q+d7RXwUNcohR1XD
 utam4NKTK0+bxCHYUPGTqbWyq8zLi+1UE8HcRvL26CGHfJR3zmYCW2apGFz2zfI+HBpx
 3BMwJFjKEI4ozMzOlAHeyn7iSE8bDooyKAFzYTV4q7H1nkpAwdQOztoZIu6d+1aHLPHW
 +IxQ/uEqdtS9RH2LbJAtUtfgskPE6O9CX4cAAI8q3mtcc3EseQat6QsWJSjPbpRbzKHQ
 VrIb5u1d+2fahX1/R9PsF9rf7+5F/sxSuALrcKL8j96Z48QgHjUv8TFGYgKMVye+jDC3
 EjHw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id
 :mime-version;
 bh=5tIZd37HGyHuyYbBcfqL4P5pukf4oxWijzLM+YKdzZ8=;
 b=hPVpWpPwf9taj3zznTtM2Rl60i7IW8/OgfVErJLgpGGiNywPCEkkGNbRUWzuPFgNwd
 P57wmLvuHW26b5Y3twJIj3iAW2kZXlj9XJTEBlfHY7fdJ9GrGAueS51q6WgXS5jflBNV
 7xB9Lx+Sk5bJYEIA+A7Lp8MkquG1fbbe3jK2tAtwzgXeGmaIcZyRB9u07n5QWM0H0Xif
 Pt2IFlyx98CqiIW2tDxpUN6vNRDlA1FHigwNhPbL+C9tPlH5yfnKM+8kOJXcNaLjbZ55
 /Oyqn7ccsvOvVb+X61wWItT6S9/WLzbBoh/QoefL7gSFR5PJDgOhCB2A5mTohf4taFBj
 ElgA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H1+t8wuEfnfQ0Z1T9BhP3LD4jXZKQ7liiBYu452Yar+iZwJdF9X6+othzt6t9bLqg==
X-Received: by 10.107.58.131 with SMTP id h125mr12229526ioa.37.1490405731593; 
 Fri, 24 Mar 2017 18:35:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zony ([45.2.7.65])
 by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id h11sm2060450ioa.43.2017.03.24.18.35.30
 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256);
 Fri, 24 Mar 2017 18:35:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: npostavs@HIDDEN
To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: control message for bug #9034
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 21:36:54 -0400
Message-ID: <878tnu2l3d.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/)

tags 9034 confirmed
found 9034 25.2
retitle 9034 point adjustment (with invisible text) moves to the next line
quit

Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Mar 2017 01:35:39 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Mar 24 21:35:39 2017
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42972 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1cracE-0004b5-VH
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 21:35:39 -0400
Received: from mail-it0-f48.google.com ([209.85.214.48]:37039)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <npostavs@HIDDEN>) id 1cracD-0004as-Bl
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 21:35:37 -0400
Received: by mail-it0-f48.google.com with SMTP id 190so6738038itm.0
 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 18:35:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version;
 bh=5tIZd37HGyHuyYbBcfqL4P5pukf4oxWijzLM+YKdzZ8=;
 b=soI1tYcnFHgGDqeANutqgG37CGeP8uAva2lFSrZbS9uDI2eSj9Q+d7RXwUNcohR1XD
 utam4NKTK0+bxCHYUPGTqbWyq8zLi+1UE8HcRvL26CGHfJR3zmYCW2apGFz2zfI+HBpx
 3BMwJFjKEI4ozMzOlAHeyn7iSE8bDooyKAFzYTV4q7H1nkpAwdQOztoZIu6d+1aHLPHW
 +IxQ/uEqdtS9RH2LbJAtUtfgskPE6O9CX4cAAI8q3mtcc3EseQat6QsWJSjPbpRbzKHQ
 VrIb5u1d+2fahX1/R9PsF9rf7+5F/sxSuALrcKL8j96Z48QgHjUv8TFGYgKMVye+jDC3
 EjHw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id
 :mime-version;
 bh=5tIZd37HGyHuyYbBcfqL4P5pukf4oxWijzLM+YKdzZ8=;
 b=hPVpWpPwf9taj3zznTtM2Rl60i7IW8/OgfVErJLgpGGiNywPCEkkGNbRUWzuPFgNwd
 P57wmLvuHW26b5Y3twJIj3iAW2kZXlj9XJTEBlfHY7fdJ9GrGAueS51q6WgXS5jflBNV
 7xB9Lx+Sk5bJYEIA+A7Lp8MkquG1fbbe3jK2tAtwzgXeGmaIcZyRB9u07n5QWM0H0Xif
 Pt2IFlyx98CqiIW2tDxpUN6vNRDlA1FHigwNhPbL+C9tPlH5yfnKM+8kOJXcNaLjbZ55
 /Oyqn7ccsvOvVb+X61wWItT6S9/WLzbBoh/QoefL7gSFR5PJDgOhCB2A5mTohf4taFBj
 ElgA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H1+t8wuEfnfQ0Z1T9BhP3LD4jXZKQ7liiBYu452Yar+iZwJdF9X6+othzt6t9bLqg==
X-Received: by 10.107.58.131 with SMTP id h125mr12229526ioa.37.1490405731593; 
 Fri, 24 Mar 2017 18:35:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zony ([45.2.7.65])
 by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id h11sm2060450ioa.43.2017.03.24.18.35.30
 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256);
 Fri, 24 Mar 2017 18:35:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: npostavs@HIDDEN
To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: control message for bug #9034
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 21:36:54 -0400
Message-ID: <878tnu2l3d.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/)

tags 9034 confirmed
found 9034 25.2
retitle 9034 point adjustment (with invisible text) moves to the next line
quit

Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Mar 2017 01:35:39 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Mar 24 21:35:39 2017
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42972 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1cracE-0004b5-VH
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 21:35:39 -0400
Received: from mail-it0-f48.google.com ([209.85.214.48]:37039)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <npostavs@HIDDEN>) id 1cracD-0004as-Bl
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 21:35:37 -0400
Received: by mail-it0-f48.google.com with SMTP id 190so6738038itm.0
 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 18:35:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version;
 bh=5tIZd37HGyHuyYbBcfqL4P5pukf4oxWijzLM+YKdzZ8=;
 b=soI1tYcnFHgGDqeANutqgG37CGeP8uAva2lFSrZbS9uDI2eSj9Q+d7RXwUNcohR1XD
 utam4NKTK0+bxCHYUPGTqbWyq8zLi+1UE8HcRvL26CGHfJR3zmYCW2apGFz2zfI+HBpx
 3BMwJFjKEI4ozMzOlAHeyn7iSE8bDooyKAFzYTV4q7H1nkpAwdQOztoZIu6d+1aHLPHW
 +IxQ/uEqdtS9RH2LbJAtUtfgskPE6O9CX4cAAI8q3mtcc3EseQat6QsWJSjPbpRbzKHQ
 VrIb5u1d+2fahX1/R9PsF9rf7+5F/sxSuALrcKL8j96Z48QgHjUv8TFGYgKMVye+jDC3
 EjHw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id
 :mime-version;
 bh=5tIZd37HGyHuyYbBcfqL4P5pukf4oxWijzLM+YKdzZ8=;
 b=hPVpWpPwf9taj3zznTtM2Rl60i7IW8/OgfVErJLgpGGiNywPCEkkGNbRUWzuPFgNwd
 P57wmLvuHW26b5Y3twJIj3iAW2kZXlj9XJTEBlfHY7fdJ9GrGAueS51q6WgXS5jflBNV
 7xB9Lx+Sk5bJYEIA+A7Lp8MkquG1fbbe3jK2tAtwzgXeGmaIcZyRB9u07n5QWM0H0Xif
 Pt2IFlyx98CqiIW2tDxpUN6vNRDlA1FHigwNhPbL+C9tPlH5yfnKM+8kOJXcNaLjbZ55
 /Oyqn7ccsvOvVb+X61wWItT6S9/WLzbBoh/QoefL7gSFR5PJDgOhCB2A5mTohf4taFBj
 ElgA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H1+t8wuEfnfQ0Z1T9BhP3LD4jXZKQ7liiBYu452Yar+iZwJdF9X6+othzt6t9bLqg==
X-Received: by 10.107.58.131 with SMTP id h125mr12229526ioa.37.1490405731593; 
 Fri, 24 Mar 2017 18:35:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zony ([45.2.7.65])
 by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id h11sm2060450ioa.43.2017.03.24.18.35.30
 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256);
 Fri, 24 Mar 2017 18:35:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: npostavs@HIDDEN
To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: control message for bug #9034
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 21:36:54 -0400
Message-ID: <878tnu2l3d.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/)

tags 9034 confirmed
found 9034 25.2
retitle 9034 point adjustment (with invisible text) moves to the next line
quit

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#9034: point adjustment (with invisible text) moves to the next line
Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 16:33:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.9034.B9034.162990915125916 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9034
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed
To: Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@HIDDEN>
Cc: 9034 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 9034-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B9034.162990915125916
          (code B ref 9034); Wed, 25 Aug 2021 16:33:02 +0000
Received: (at 9034) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Aug 2021 16:32:31 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47486 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1mIvpH-0006jv-J4
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:32:31 -0400
Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:38656)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1mIvpD-0006je-2F
 for 9034 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:32:30 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org;
 s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:
 References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:
 Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:
 Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:
 List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
 bh=qqFxARSoy/1Q6Q4hHH8CDOy0rbPpTNzNlnFy9SppzO0=; b=Qh1CjosBiMa7BN+6gvN9AWvmQ6
 6l00YdVQylB/dMAJpJfCnwEvAOSmtqMpAyY4hoLyAFBPsn96uAVEIss99Sa/dp8pFAhIUmlux/Kws
 wPLBDsIVYD5zsk0mgf3DLe9AOa5BrWoqj3k1PThqhR4emZAlWP8x0jPQX3/5VXtqF19s=;
Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva)
 by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>)
 id 1mIvp2-0006YQ-HW; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 18:32:20 +0200
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
References: <87iprb38sa.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 18:32:15 +0200
In-Reply-To: <87iprb38sa.fsf@HIDDEN> (Dmitry Kurochkin's message of "Sat,
 09 Jul 2011 17:04:05 +0400")
Message-ID: <87tujd32pc.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
 Content preview: Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@HIDDEN> writes: >
 (progn
 (switch-to-buffer "test") > (insert "aline1\nbline2\ncline3\n") >
 (put-text-property
 7 14 'invisible t) ; region [\nbline2] > (goto-char (point-min))) > > After
 that in the test buffer do M-: [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 [score: 0.0000]
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@HIDDEN> writes:

>   (progn (switch-to-buffer "test")
>          (insert "aline1\nbline2\ncline3\n")
>          (put-text-property 7 14 'invisible t) ; region [\nbline2]
>          (goto-char (point-min)))
>
> After that in the test buffer do M-: (progn (end-of-visual-line)
> (point)).  `end-of-visual-line' moves point to position 14 as expected.
> But after that the point is adjusted to position 15, as can be checked
> by C-x =.

(I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately got weren't
resolved at the time.)

This problem is still present in Emacs 28, and as previously noted, any
command you do (with `M-:') makes point advance to the next line.  (It's
not 100% reproducible -- sometimes nothing happens, and sometimes it
advances.)

So `C-e' and then, for instance `M-: 4 RET' will advance point here.

Also as previously noted, if Vglobal_disable_point_adjustment is on,
then this doesn't happen, so the problem almost has to be here:

command_loop_1
...
      if (current_buffer == prev_buffer
	  && XBUFFER (XWINDOW (selected_window)->contents) == current_buffer
	  && last_point_position != PT
	  && NILP (Vdisable_point_adjustment)
	  && NILP (Vglobal_disable_point_adjustment))
	{
	  if (last_point_position > BEGV
	      && last_point_position < ZV
	      && (composition_adjust_point (last_point_position,
					    last_point_position)
		  != last_point_position))
	    /* The last point was temporarily set within a grapheme
	       cluster to prevent automatic composition.  To recover
	       the automatic composition, we must update the
	       display.  */
	    windows_or_buffers_changed = 21;
	  if (!already_adjusted)
	    adjust_point_for_property (last_point_position,
				       MODIFF != prev_modiff);
	}

I haven't tried to debug any further -- is it obvious to anybody what's
failing here, by any chance?  :-)

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no

Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Aug 2021 16:32:36 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Aug 25 12:32:36 2021
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47489 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1mIvpL-0006kC-RV
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:32:36 -0400
Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:38670)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1mIvpK-0006jm-F2
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:32:34 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org;
 s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:
 MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:
 Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc
 :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:
 List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
 bh=P+KuOjEGpH1Hn7/OkZ/MUIfdeyEbnw2m9AwMSkV0nG8=; b=j9YOvGFSvsxXzMrdV+m1B1lW7S
 Ue0Dkq26YMFnpy1w1nKPRyMBkbk8Lc0hNkKKsnZmd60sbc+USbZ6tCJCSCSUhtkJ+KLq6iPHNFPxL
 dwFSRmkv7HDodBzht8YTG1IddlUJKq3UT92I5HwKrw3kLdzUeVM1knnkiFlst5opm2BU=;
Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva)
 by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1mIvpC-0006Yc-D3
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 18:32:28 +0200
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 18:32:24 +0200
Message-Id: <87sfyx32p3.fsf@HIDDEN>
To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
Subject: control message for bug #9034
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
 Content preview:  tags 9034 + moreinfo quit 
 Content analysis details:   (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 [score: 0.0000]
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

tags 9034 + moreinfo
quit

Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Aug 2021 16:32:40 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Aug 25 12:32:40 2021
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47492 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1mIvpQ-0006kT-1Y
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:32:40 -0400
Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:38682)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1mIvpO-0006k4-Kd
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:32:38 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org;
 s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:
 MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:
 Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc
 :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:
 List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
 bh=gGdilEuK5oN11ReEVhEtZ+UitXoNuh8OJSICfvBzYuE=; b=TOOEojolNsM9Pfj8orHggaeQyl
 CvnKDi0hOunTm1DYJJhc9whPYxbbyEO+LKXnKcoi0qd3ZhOOZKpFpuTmreNIltR5LycncB/aJ7/b7
 5s+afXqbFmFc7zCKHl6AwLzpMr3t2XKgfMBga67DmYv/vAgfV76Dq0lICrBAZ+6Qjego=;
Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva)
 by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1mIvpG-0006Yl-Hg
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 18:32:32 +0200
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 18:32:30 +0200
Message-Id: <87r1eh32ox.fsf@HIDDEN>
To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
Subject: control message for bug #9034
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
 Content preview:  tags 9034 - moreinfo quit 
 Content analysis details:   (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 [score: 0.0000]
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

tags 9034 - moreinfo
quit

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#9034: point adjustment (with invisible text) moves to the next line
Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 16:44:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.9034.B9034.162990982727068 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9034
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
Cc: 9034 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, dmitry.kurochkin@HIDDEN
Received: via spool by 9034-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B9034.162990982727068
          (code B ref 9034); Wed, 25 Aug 2021 16:44:01 +0000
Received: (at 9034) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Aug 2021 16:43:47 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47515 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1mIw0B-00072W-II
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:43:47 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54562)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1mIw07-00072I-Qq
 for 9034 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:43:47 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53388)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>)
 id 1mIw02-0006zy-Hd; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:43:38 -0400
Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1283
 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>)
 id 1mIw02-0004nq-4h; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:43:38 -0400
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 19:43:34 +0300
Message-Id: <834kbdv5jd.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87tujd32pc.fsf@HIDDEN> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Wed, 
 25 Aug 2021 18:32:15 +0200)
References: <87iprb38sa.fsf@HIDDEN> <87tujd32pc.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
> Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 18:32:15 +0200
> Cc: 9034 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> Also as previously noted, if Vglobal_disable_point_adjustment is on,
> then this doesn't happen, so the problem almost has to be here:
> 
> command_loop_1
> ...
>       if (current_buffer == prev_buffer
> 	  && XBUFFER (XWINDOW (selected_window)->contents) == current_buffer
> 	  && last_point_position != PT
> 	  && NILP (Vdisable_point_adjustment)
> 	  && NILP (Vglobal_disable_point_adjustment))
> 	{
> 	  if (last_point_position > BEGV
> 	      && last_point_position < ZV
> 	      && (composition_adjust_point (last_point_position,
> 					    last_point_position)
> 		  != last_point_position))
> 	    /* The last point was temporarily set within a grapheme
> 	       cluster to prevent automatic composition.  To recover
> 	       the automatic composition, we must update the
> 	       display.  */
> 	    windows_or_buffers_changed = 21;
> 	  if (!already_adjusted)
> 	    adjust_point_for_property (last_point_position,
> 				       MODIFF != prev_modiff);
> 	}
> 
> I haven't tried to debug any further -- is it obvious to anybody what's
> failing here, by any chance?  :-)

This code is chock-full of questionable heuristics, and in particular
tries to guess in which direction to move point out of the invisible
text.  The results are sometimes surprising.  The upside is that it
"mostly works".  But if someone can come up with a better heuristics,
I'm all ears.

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#9034: point adjustment (with invisible text) moves to the next line
Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 13:49:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.9034.B9034.16299857393595 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9034
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Cc: 9034 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, dmitry.kurochkin@HIDDEN
Received: via spool by 9034-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B9034.16299857393595
          (code B ref 9034); Thu, 26 Aug 2021 13:49:02 +0000
Received: (at 9034) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Aug 2021 13:48:59 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48594 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1mJFkZ-0000vu-8N
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 09:48:59 -0400
Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:47494)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1mJFkN-0000vX-JA
 for 9034 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 09:48:58 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org;
 s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:
 References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:
 Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:
 Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:
 List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
 bh=mKJww2KgCTytDu7JmhaFfkgt4wuvydB9ldSzL2H47oA=; b=BoQnlxk178JORLjov6wZhnqL9x
 yTJ+8i6CNE0V6JUZWF/xoNDMcFVhn99IOxGGro0QILF1kcR0ZyYTh762SaR1gynzYL5wMXcOpV3NW
 ZQYJwxR0QX7ZYpcRAUkDNV7mExlvda9Ug81xpwxXTJkEuBa4R45fQ/evEiG3U4xZlz00=;
Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva)
 by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>)
 id 1mJFkC-0001NU-M5; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 15:48:40 +0200
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
References: <87iprb38sa.fsf@HIDDEN> <87tujd32pc.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <834kbdv5jd.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 15:48:32 +0200
In-Reply-To: <834kbdv5jd.fsf@HIDDEN> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 25 Aug
 2021 19:43:34 +0300")
Message-ID: <877dg82u6n.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
 Content preview: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes: > This code is
 chock-full of questionable heuristics,
 and in particular > tries to guess in which direction
 to move point out of the invisible > text. The results are sometimes
 surprising. The upside [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 [score: 0.0000]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes:

> This code is chock-full of questionable heuristics, and in particular
> tries to guess in which direction to move point out of the invisible
> text.  The results are sometimes surprising.  The upside is that it
> "mostly works".  But if someone can come up with a better heuristics,
> I'm all ears.

Ah, right.  But...  the super-confusing thing about this is that we're
not moving point in the buffer at all.  Just doing `M-: 4 RET' will
result in this code adjusting point in the buffer.  Doing, for instance,
`M-x foo RET' (where `foo' does nothing) does not result in this point
movement.

So is `M-:' doing some weird thing in the original buffer to trigger
this oddity?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#9034: point adjustment (with invisible text) moves to the next line
Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 15:48:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.9034.B9034.16299928259202 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9034
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
Cc: 9034 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, dmitry.kurochkin@HIDDEN
Received: via spool by 9034-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B9034.16299928259202
          (code B ref 9034); Thu, 26 Aug 2021 15:48:01 +0000
Received: (at 9034) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Aug 2021 15:47:05 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50189 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1mJHar-0002OM-BI
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 11:47:05 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40444)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1mJHap-0002No-E0
 for 9034 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 11:47:03 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40172)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>)
 id 1mJHaj-0006Ga-Qh; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 11:46:57 -0400
Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2618
 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>)
 id 1mJHaj-0000iV-E0; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 11:46:57 -0400
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 18:46:37 +0300
Message-Id: <8335qwtdia.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <877dg82u6n.fsf@HIDDEN> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Thu, 
 26 Aug 2021 15:48:32 +0200)
References: <87iprb38sa.fsf@HIDDEN> <87tujd32pc.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <834kbdv5jd.fsf@HIDDEN> <877dg82u6n.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
> Cc: dmitry.kurochkin@HIDDEN,  9034 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 15:48:32 +0200
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes:
> 
> > This code is chock-full of questionable heuristics, and in particular
> > tries to guess in which direction to move point out of the invisible
> > text.  The results are sometimes surprising.  The upside is that it
> > "mostly works".  But if someone can come up with a better heuristics,
> > I'm all ears.
> 
> Ah, right.  But...  the super-confusing thing about this is that we're
> not moving point in the buffer at all.

The original recipe moved from point-min to an end of a line.

> Just doing `M-: 4 RET' will result in this code adjusting point in
> the buffer.  Doing, for instance, `M-x foo RET' (where `foo' does
> nothing) does not result in this point movement.
> 
> So is `M-:' doing some weird thing in the original buffer to trigger
> this oddity?

Doing M-: in what part of the recipe?

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#9034: point adjustment (with invisible text) moves to the next line
Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 16:34:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.9034.B9034.162999562222156 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9034
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Cc: 9034 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, dmitry.kurochkin@HIDDEN
Received: via spool by 9034-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B9034.162999562222156
          (code B ref 9034); Thu, 26 Aug 2021 16:34:01 +0000
Received: (at 9034) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Aug 2021 16:33:42 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50248 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1mJIJy-0005lI-8f
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 12:33:42 -0400
Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:49000)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1mJIJw-0005l3-7T
 for 9034 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 12:33:40 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org;
 s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:
 References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:
 Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:
 Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:
 List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
 bh=Am+A3thQv1YbGRlt4KL3THodK9O06D7AawfsRgkbJlQ=; b=CbRxNFoTGGsPfd86O9O3v/jknE
 y5Fvawem3tzLi1K2YOU4TAd6sz/bHlW8ls5Yeg06wztWIpjivYn0L6aGP9W3qTKND5tfIvxMEMOua
 QKBUrKu11FsjWSanK2xjWiFylD/BOzvypfzhyMASww5jlf5U+2Mk+zPcyJ3niOBABDTA=;
Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva)
 by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>)
 id 1mJIJl-0002xW-Nq; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 18:33:33 +0200
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
References: <87iprb38sa.fsf@HIDDEN> <87tujd32pc.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <834kbdv5jd.fsf@HIDDEN> <877dg82u6n.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <8335qwtdia.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 18:33:29 +0200
In-Reply-To: <8335qwtdia.fsf@HIDDEN> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 26 Aug
 2021 18:46:37 +0300")
Message-ID: <871r6gyxly.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
 Content preview:  Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes: >> Just doing `M-: 4
 RET' will result in this code adjusting point in >> the buffer. Doing, for
 instance, `M-x foo RET' (where `foo' does >> nothing) does not result in
 this point movement. >> >> So i [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 [score: 0.0000]
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes:

>> Just doing `M-: 4 RET' will result in this code adjusting point in
>> the buffer.  Doing, for instance, `M-x foo RET' (where `foo' does
>> nothing) does not result in this point movement.
>> 
>> So is `M-:' doing some weird thing in the original buffer to trigger
>> this oddity?
>
> Doing M-: in what part of the recipe?

Eval this:

  (progn (switch-to-buffer "test")
         (insert "aline1\nbline2\ncline3\n")
         (put-text-property 7 14 'invisible t) ; region [\nbline2]
         (goto-char (point-min)))

Then

C-e
M-: 4 RET

This will move point to the start of the next line about half the time.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no

Last modified: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 16:45:01 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.