Received: (at 9718) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Oct 2011 06:02:21 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 17 02:02:21 2011 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1RFgHE-0003Ba-4Y for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 02:02:21 -0400 Received: from senmx11-mx.siemens-enterprise.com ([62.134.46.9]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bernhard.voelker@HIDDEN>) id 1RFgHB-0003BM-6J for 9718 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 02:02:18 -0400 Received: from MCHP063A.global-ad.net (unknown [172.29.37.61]) by senmx11-mx.siemens-enterprise.com (Server) with ESMTP id 6B98B1EB843F; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:01:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from MCHP058A.global-ad.net ([172.29.37.55]) by MCHP063A.global-ad.net ([172.29.37.61]) with mapi; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:01:21 +0200 From: "Voelker, Bernhard" <bernhard.voelker@HIDDEN> To: Jim Meyering <jim@HIDDEN>, Eric Blake <eblake@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:01:18 +0200 Subject: RE: bug#9718: bugs in `date` command? Thread-Topic: bug#9718: bugs in `date` command? Thread-Index: AcyKqbLivFzCCw+RRx+DCwj5VFhm6QB59QEg Message-ID: <7856072A9D04C24B82DFE2B1112FE38A0D83C5375E@HIDDEN> References: <20111010163521.GP4958@HIDDEN> <7856072A9D04C24B82DFE2B1112FE38A0D83B8E962@HIDDEN> <4E944BCC.9030102@HIDDEN> <87r52fl5nk.fsf@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <87r52fl5nk.fsf@HIDDEN> Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: de-DE, en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9718 Cc: "9718 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <9718 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>, Bryan Lee <leebc11@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.2 (---) Jim Meyering wrote: > Eric Blake wrote: > ... > > As currently coded in the grammar, this is correct. But if someone > > were willing to put forth the effort to update parsedate.y, as well as > > enhance the testsuite to cover things, it might be possible to improve > > the grammar to accept both common meanings of "second" depending on > > the context where it appears compared to the rest of the date. >=20 > Just in case, I've marked this as "wishlist". > If you're interested, please add it to TODO. > If not, please close this. I don't know if it violates some standards, but I'd vote for abbreviations like "1st", "2nd", "3rd", "4th", etc. which do not interfere with the double meaning of "second". What do you think? Have a nice day, Berny=
bug-coreutils@HIDDEN:bug#9718; Package coreutils.
Full text available.Jim Meyering <jim@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
Full text available.Jim Meyering <jim@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
Full text available.Received: (at 9718) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Oct 2011 21:03:38 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Oct 14 17:03:38 2011 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1REouo-0003fR-2K for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 17:03:38 -0400 Received: from mx.meyering.net ([88.168.87.75]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <jim@HIDDEN>) id 1REoul-0003fD-Pj; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 17:03:36 -0400 Received: from rho.meyering.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rho.meyering.net (Acme Bit-Twister) with ESMTP id 3A2A362095; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 21:44:31 +0200 (CEST) From: Jim Meyering <jim@HIDDEN> To: Eric Blake <eblake@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#9718: bugs in `date` command? In-Reply-To: <4E944BCC.9030102@HIDDEN> (Eric Blake's message of "Tue, 11 Oct 2011 07:59:40 -0600") References: <20111010163521.GP4958@HIDDEN> <7856072A9D04C24B82DFE2B1112FE38A0D83B8E962@HIDDEN> <4E944BCC.9030102@HIDDEN> Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 21:44:31 +0200 Message-ID: <87r52fl5nk.fsf@HIDDEN> Lines: 15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9718 Cc: "9718 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <9718 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>, Bryan Lee <leebc11@HIDDEN>, "Voelker, Bernhard" <bernhard.voelker@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) severity 9718 wishlist tags 9718 + notabug thanks Eric Blake wrote: ... > As currently coded in the grammar, this is correct. But if someone > were willing to put forth the effort to update parsedate.y, as well as > enhance the testsuite to cover things, it might be possible to improve > the grammar to accept both common meanings of "second" depending on > the context where it appears compared to the rest of the date. Just in case, I've marked this as "wishlist". If you're interested, please add it to TODO. If not, please close this.
bug-coreutils@HIDDEN:bug#9718; Package coreutils.
Full text available.Received: (at 9718) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Oct 2011 21:48:01 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 11 17:48:01 2011 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1RDkB6-0001qN-Q3 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:48:00 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.123]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <leebc@HIDDEN>) id 1RDkB4-0001qC-0y for 9718 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:47:58 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=XWD5/VRj2HUJOhsR8cgmvPBlhMACpZXxseY1Kn/ehQI= c=1 sm=0 a=u_3Lvyrfp9IA:10 a=iwcTU3hDW-YA:10 a=kWQ6D_09QQAA:10 a=ua5oddhXE4YA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=wkU1UVxjIdmUjPiqL7IcVQ==:17 a=3fnhGqmWq9Pc806cbiwA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=wkU1UVxjIdmUjPiqL7IcVQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 97.97.159.198 Received: from [97.97.159.198] ([97.97.159.198:48776] helo=glaive) by hrndva-oedge02.mail.rr.com (envelope-from <leebc@HIDDEN>) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 48/62-07715-779B49E4; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 21:47:35 +0000 Received: from leebc by glaive with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <leebc@HIDDEN>) id 1RDkAg-0001iC-Vr; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:47:34 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:47:34 -0400 From: Bryan Lee <leebc11@HIDDEN> To: Eric Blake <eblake@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#9718: bugs in `date` command? Message-ID: <20111011214734.GU4958@HIDDEN> References: <20111010163521.GP4958@HIDDEN> <7856072A9D04C24B82DFE2B1112FE38A0D83B8E962@HIDDEN> <4E944BCC.9030102@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E944BCC.9030102@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9718 Cc: "9718 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <9718 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>, "Voelker, Bernhard" <bernhard.voelker@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.9 (---) Thus Eric Blake hast written on Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 07:59:40AM -0600, and, according to prophecy, it shall come to pass that: > On 10/11/2011 01:31 AM, Voelker, Bernhard wrote: >> Thank you for the report, however I don't see what's wrong. >> I guess you meant "second wednesday" - which you probably expected >> to display Oct 19th? Exactly. >> As 'second' is already used for the time unit 'second', it cannot >> be used as an ordinal number for 2nd. I see that now. I think I read the definition os "second" when I went through the info page, but I totally missed the signifigence. Especially since "third" worked. > As currently coded in the grammar, this is correct. But if someone were I agree. Thank you Eric Blake and Bernhard Voelker for your assistance. I appologize for my error.
bug-coreutils@HIDDEN:bug#9718; Package coreutils.
Full text available.Received: (at 9718) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Oct 2011 14:00:06 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 11 10:00:06 2011 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1RDcsH-00078W-9u for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:00:06 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <eblake@HIDDEN>) id 1RDcsD-000773-GB for 9718 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:00:03 -0400 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9BDxgJo017586 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:59:42 -0400 Received: from [10.3.113.147] (ovpn-113-147.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.147]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p9BDxf55014485; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:59:41 -0400 Message-ID: <4E944BCC.9030102@HIDDEN> Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 07:59:40 -0600 From: Eric Blake <eblake@HIDDEN> Organization: Red Hat User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110928 Fedora/3.1.15-1.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Mnenhy/0.8.4 Thunderbird/3.1.15 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Voelker, Bernhard" <bernhard.voelker@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#9718: bugs in `date` command? References: <20111010163521.GP4958@HIDDEN> <7856072A9D04C24B82DFE2B1112FE38A0D83B8E962@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <7856072A9D04C24B82DFE2B1112FE38A0D83B8E962@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.11.11 X-Spam-Score: -10.3 (----------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9718 Cc: "9718 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <9718 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>, Bryan Lee <leebc11@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -10.3 (----------) On 10/11/2011 01:31 AM, Voelker, Bernhard wrote: > Bryan Lee wrote: > >> The term "third wednesday" seems to be evaluating incorrectly. >> >> glaive 12:24:56 [~]% date >> Mon Oct 10 12:24:59 EDT 2011 >> >> glaive 12:24:59 [~]% date -d "first wednesday" >> Wed Oct 12 00:00:00 EDT 2011 >> >> glaive 12:25:09 [~]% date -d "second wednesday" >> Wed Oct 12 00:00:01 EDT 2011 Indeed, this was parsed as "first wednesday + 1 second" > Thank you for the report, however I don't see what's wrong. > I guess you meant "second wednesday" - which you probably expected > to display Oct 19th? > > As 'second' is already used for the time unit 'second', it cannot > be used as an ordinal number for 2nd. As currently coded in the grammar, this is correct. But if someone were willing to put forth the effort to update parsedate.y, as well as enhance the testsuite to cover things, it might be possible to improve the grammar to accept both common meanings of "second" depending on the context where it appears compared to the rest of the date. -- Eric Blake eblake@HIDDEN +1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
bug-coreutils@HIDDEN:bug#9718; Package coreutils.
Full text available.
Received: (at 9718) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Oct 2011 07:31:27 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 11 03:31:27 2011
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1RDWoB-0005aD-4C
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 03:31:27 -0400
Received: from senmx12-mx.siemens-enterprise.com ([62.134.46.10])
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <bernhard.voelker@HIDDEN>)
id 1RDWo8-0005a1-BU
for 9718 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 03:31:25 -0400
Received: from MCHP063A.global-ad.net (unknown [172.29.37.61])
by senmx12-mx.siemens-enterprise.com (Server) with ESMTP id
3114523F0461; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:31:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from MCHP058A.global-ad.net ([172.29.37.55]) by
MCHP063A.global-ad.net ([172.29.37.61]) with mapi;
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:31:02 +0200
From: "Voelker, Bernhard" <bernhard.voelker@HIDDEN>
To: Bryan Lee <leebc11@HIDDEN>, "9718 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <9718 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:31:00 +0200
Subject: RE: bug#9718: bugs in `date` command?
Thread-Topic: bug#9718: bugs in `date` command?
Thread-Index: AcyHaukOvBl5VEaBRbCGcBqYoAKdYQAe9zpQ
Message-ID: <7856072A9D04C24B82DFE2B1112FE38A0D83B8E962@HIDDEN>
References: <20111010163521.GP4958@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <20111010163521.GP4958@HIDDEN>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: de-DE, en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9718
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)
Bryan Lee wrote:
> The term "third wednesday" seems to be evaluating incorrectly.
>=20
> glaive 12:24:56 [~]% date
> Mon Oct 10 12:24:59 EDT 2011
>=20
> glaive 12:24:59 [~]% date -d "first wednesday"
> Wed Oct 12 00:00:00 EDT 2011
>=20
> glaive 12:25:09 [~]% date -d "second wednesday"
> Wed Oct 12 00:00:01 EDT 2011
>=20
> glaive 12:25:16 [~]% date -d "third wednesday"
> Wed Oct 26 00:00:00 EDT 2011
>=20
> glaive 12:25:21 [~]% date -d "fourth wednesday"
> Wed Nov 2 00:00:00 EDT 2011
Thank you for the report, however I don't see what's wrong.
I guess you meant "second wednesday" - which you probably expected
to display Oct 19th?
As 'second' is already used for the time unit 'second', it cannot
be used as an ordinal number for 2nd. The info text clarifies this
(info coreutils 'date invocation'):
A few ordinal numbers may be written out in words in some contexts.
This is most useful for specifying day of the week items or relative
items (see below). Among the most commonly used ordinal numbers, the
word `last' stands for -1, `this' stands for 0, and `first' and `next'
both stand for 1. Because the word `second' stands for the unit of
time there is no way to write the ordinal number 2, but for convenience
`third' stands for 3, `fourth' for 4, `fifth' for 5, `sixth' for 6,
`seventh' for 7, `eighth' for 8, `ninth' for 9, `tenth' for 10,
`eleventh' for 11 and `twelfth' for 12.
Did you mean this?
Have a nice day,
Berny=
bug-coreutils@HIDDEN:bug#9718; Package coreutils.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Oct 2011 16:36:56 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 10 12:36:56 2011 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1RDIqW-0006VV-0i for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:36:56 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <leebc@HIDDEN>) id 1RDIpR-0006TT-8U for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:35:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <leebc@HIDDEN>) id 1RDIp8-0005PT-TA for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:35:32 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:47269) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <leebc@HIDDEN>) id 1RDIp8-0005PP-Qr for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:35:30 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:56246) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <leebc@HIDDEN>) id 1RDIp7-0004XQ-Ke for bug-coreutils@HIDDEN; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:35:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <leebc@HIDDEN>) id 1RDIp6-0005P9-Gv for bug-coreutils@HIDDEN; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:35:29 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.124]:37297) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <leebc@HIDDEN>) id 1RDIp6-0005Og-F0 for bug-coreutils@HIDDEN; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:35:28 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=cSzO76bR5tCkfUT9bEmBgR3d7VUusRLeq08eKGxa4EU= c=1 sm=0 a=u_3Lvyrfp9IA:10 a=kWQ6D_09QQAA:10 a=ua5oddhXE4YA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=wkU1UVxjIdmUjPiqL7IcVQ==:17 a=KwLA2uOilzorl_0mfO4A:9 a=Es0umpMMuP-R6c_YXxEA:7 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=wkU1UVxjIdmUjPiqL7IcVQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 97.97.159.198 Received: from [97.97.159.198] ([97.97.159.198:59454] helo=glaive) by hrndva-oedge04.mail.rr.com (envelope-from <leebc@HIDDEN>) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 49/A0-05514-9CE139E4; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:35:21 +0000 Received: from leebc by glaive with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <leebc@HIDDEN>) id 1RDIoz-0001wO-Bp for bug-coreutils@HIDDEN; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:35:21 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:35:21 -0400 From: Bryan Lee <leebc11@HIDDEN> To: bug-coreutils@HIDDEN Subject: bugs in `date` command? Message-ID: <20111010163521.GP4958@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:36:54 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) The term "third wednesday" seems to be evaluating incorrectly. glaive 12:24:56 [~]% date Mon Oct 10 12:24:59 EDT 2011 glaive 12:24:59 [~]% date -d "first wednesday" Wed Oct 12 00:00:00 EDT 2011 glaive 12:25:09 [~]% date -d "second wednesday" Wed Oct 12 00:00:01 EDT 2011 glaive 12:25:16 [~]% date -d "third wednesday" Wed Oct 26 00:00:00 EDT 2011 glaive 12:25:21 [~]% date -d "fourth wednesday" Wed Nov 2 00:00:00 EDT 2011 glaive 12:25:27 [~]% date -d "fifth wednesday" Wed Nov 9 00:00:00 EST 2011 glaive 12:25:34 [~]% date -d "next wednesday" Wed Oct 12 00:00:00 EDT 2011 glaive 12:25:41 [~]% date -d "last wednesday" Wed Oct 5 00:00:00 EDT 2011 glaive 12:25:46 [~]% date -d "this wednesday" Wed Oct 12 00:00:00 EDT 2011 glaive 12:33:39 [~]% date -d "third wednesday this month" Wed Oct 26 00:00:00 EDT 2011 glaive 12:34:11 [~]% date -d "3 wednesday" Wed Oct 26 00:00:00 EDT 2011 glaive 12:34:13 [~]% date -d "2 wednesday" Wed Oct 19 00:00:00 EDT 2011 glaive 12:34:28 [~]% date -d "1 wednesday" Wed Oct 12 00:00:00 EDT 2011 glaive 12:34:39 [~]% date -d "4 wednesday" Wed Nov 2 00:00:00 EDT 2011
Bryan Lee <leebc11@HIDDEN>:bug-coreutils@HIDDEN.
Full text available.bug-coreutils@HIDDEN:bug#9718; Package coreutils.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.