GNU bug report logs -
#936
messages injected by a newsgroup gateway do not reach debbugs.gnu.org
Previous Next
To reply to this bug, email your comments to 936 AT debbugs.gnu.org.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Message #3 received at quiet <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):
Package: emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
(Filing report for:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2008-09/msg00154.html)
Some mails appear on bug-gnu-emacs, but not on emacsbugs. I think the
gateway from the gnu.emacs.bug newsgroup may be responsible somehow.
Eg:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2008-08/msg00916.html
never appeared in bug #821.
Nor did another followup today, trimmed headers below.
It's not clear to me if a news->mail gateway can function at all now
we have a tracker. It would have to append mails with an existing bug
number in the subject to a report, and create a new bug otherwise. No
idea where the automated reply messages would try to go...
X-From-Line: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+rgm=gnu.org <at> gnu.org Wed Sep 3 13:38:53 2008
Return-path: <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+rgm=gnu.org <at> gnu.org>
Envelope-to: rgm <at> gnu.org
Delivery-date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:38:53 -0400
Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:47851 helo=mx10.gnu.org)
by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67)
(envelope-from <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+rgm=gnu.org <at> gnu.org>)
id 1KawJh-00058T-SS
for rgm <at> gnu.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:38:53 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+rgm=gnu.org <at> gnu.org>)
id 1KawLC-0001Tl-Pw
for rgm <at> gnu.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:40:31 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:54636)
by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+rgm=gnu.org <at> gnu.org>)
id 1KawLC-0001Td-Hj
for rgm <at> gnu.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:40:26 -0400
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47793 helo=lists.gnu.org)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1KawLC-0004UK-FE
for rgm <at> gnu.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:40:26 -0400
Path: news.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!multikabel.net!feed20.multikabel.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!news.albasani.net!not-for-mail
From: Ted Zlatanov <tzz <at> lifelogs.com>
Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.bug
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 12:22:36 -0500
Message-ID: <8663pdf8kj.fsf <at> lifelogs.com>
References: <mailman.17908.1220026057.18990.bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
<86prnriynu.fsf <at> lifelogs.com>
<mailman.17964.1220052456.18990.bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: news.albasani.net
bxDRxvx0bL7COxec1PeE/IznkdeVVt8PRXLGf+zpKd7zo36AO0J9WYRTzBDKDYReIk6ccLTCwqbccH9hq8Sw+YfQMLSiCoAFvxu8W0zVuMNMvOk77J+X7PD/vvtPqXuw
X-Complaints-To: abuse <at> albasani.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 17:22:36 +0000 (UTC)
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: RrFlv9R0pjcxBP45tmNK3xjf+P/LcQQqbmBTqrk50iY=
Xref: fencepost.gnu.org computing.gnu-emacs-bug:16448
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#821: 23.0.60;
bootstrap fails due to define-minor-mode in textmode/paragraphs.el
X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs>,
<mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request <at> gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/bug-gnu-emacs>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request <at> gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs>,
<mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request <at> gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+rgm=gnu.org <at> gnu.org
Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+rgm=gnu.org <at> gnu.org
Severity set to `important' from `normal'
Request was from
Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
to
control <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
.
(Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:55:05 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#936
; Package
debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:04:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #10 received at 936 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
It's a long-standing issue that the news->mail gateway does not work
with the bug tracker:
http://debbugs.gnu.org/936
When someone posts a message to the gnu.emacs.bug newsgroup, it
appears on the bug-gnu-emacs mailing list, but not in the bug tracker.
For example, Ted Zlatanov's response to bug 5307 today. (Actually, he's
the only person I ever notice using the news gateway to post.)
The only idea I had to fix this was that the news->mail gateway should
inject messages into submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org rather than directly to
the bug-gnu-emacs list. (Debbugs would then automatically take care of
appending the data to an exiting report or creating a new bug
depending on whether the subject line contained an existing bug
number.)
Does anyone knw if this is doable? It doesn't seem to be possible in a
standard mailman setup, but could the FSF admins somehow add it as a
special case?
Otherwise I reiterate my proposal from
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2009-11/msg01209.html
I think it would be acceptable to make the gateway one-way,
mail->news only. I don't think people need to be able to report
bugs via usenet. For those who want to do so, gmane exists.
Information forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#936
; Package
debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:08:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #13 received at 936 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org> writes:
> Does anyone knw if this is doable? It doesn't seem to be possible in a
> standard mailman setup, but could the FSF admins somehow add it as a
> special case?
>
> Otherwise I reiterate my proposal from
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2009-11/msg01209.html
>
> I think it would be acceptable to make the gateway one-way,
> mail->news only. I don't think people need to be able to report
> bugs via usenet. For those who want to do so, gmane exists.
Let's just make it one-way. Maintaining two-way gateways is fine if
there's negligible hassle (e.g. help-gnu-emacs), but in this case it's
too much trouble.
How do we go about making it one-way, tho?
Information forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#936
; Package
debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:28:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #16 received at 936 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Chong Yidong wrote:
> Let's just make it one-way. Maintaining two-way gateways is fine if
> there's negligible hassle (e.g. help-gnu-emacs), but in this case it's
> too much trouble.
>
> How do we go about making it one-way, tho?
I think the main thing is to advertise that it's become one way.
From looking at debbugs-submit, I think actually doing it might just
be a case of unsetting the Mailman option gateway_to_mail in the
bug-gnu-emacs setup.
Information forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#936
; Package
debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:52:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #19 received at 936 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> I think it would be acceptable to make the gateway one-way,
> mail->news only. I don't think people need to be able to report
> bugs via usenet. For those who want to do so, gmane exists.
Let's just make it one-way. Maintaining two-way gateways is fine if
there's negligible hassle (e.g. help-gnu-emacs), but in this case it's
too much trouble.
I agree there is no _need_ for people to be able to post bug reports
as news. But what would be the practical result of a "one-way gateway"
when someone tries to post a bug report as news?
Would it mean that his bug report appears as news, and all seems well,
but it is never seen on the mailing list? That is not a very good
outcome.
If the gateway could send him mail to inform him that he has to post
via mail, not via news, that would be much better.
Information forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#936
; Package
debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:31:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #22 received at 936 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Richard Stallman <rms <at> gnu.org> writes:
> I agree there is no _need_ for people to be able to post bug reports
> as news. But what would be the practical result of a "one-way gateway"
> when someone tries to post a bug report as news?
I'm not sure what the difficulty is in making gnu.emacs.bug a moderated
group with the bug tracker address as moderator, and output from the bug
tracker considered as the moderated content.
Information forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#936
; Package
debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Fri, 15 Jan 2010 21:38:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #25 received at 936 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
I'm not sure what the difficulty is in making gnu.emacs.bug a moderated
group with the bug tracker address as moderator, and output from the bug
tracker considered as the moderated content.
Maybe that is a good idea.
I don't know enough to judge. However, ISTR that it is impossible to
convert a moderated group into a nonmoderated group. If that is true,
we should make damned sure this will work well, before trying it.
Information forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#936
; Package
debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Wed, 03 Feb 2010 02:28:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #28 received at 936 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
What I conclude from this is that while we have various ideas for
changing this, we don't know which, if any, will work or how to
implement them. So I think we will have to present sysadmin <at> gnu with
the list of ideas and ask them if they can see how to implement one of
them.
Otherwise the least bad option is probably to leave it as it is.
Information forwarded
to
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#936
; Package
debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sat, 18 Aug 2012 01:09:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #31 received at 936 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
retitle 936 messages injected by a newsgroup gateway do not reach debbugs.gnu.org
tag 936 wontfix
stop
I talked to fsf-sysadmin. There seems to be no prospect of fixing this,
so we're just going to live with it.
Changed bug title to 'messages injected by a newsgroup gateway do not reach debbugs.gnu.org' from 'Some mails to bug-gnu-emacs evade emacsbugs'
Request was from
Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sat, 18 Aug 2012 01:09:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Added tag(s) wontfix.
Request was from
Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sat, 18 Aug 2012 01:09:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 11 years and 254 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.