GNU logs - #16669, boring messages

Message sent to bug-coreutils@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#16669: inconsistent 'rm -ir' prompting behavior
Resent-From: Eric Blake <eblake@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 16:40:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.16669.B.139170477330654 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 16669 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Message-ID: <52F3BAAE.9060107@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 09:39:10 -0700
From: Eric Blake <eblake@HIDDEN>
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
OpenPGP: url=http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="Qk8SVxWqh6ir0Wk1EPL3OklsmClb3gc9L"
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--Qk8SVxWqh6ir0Wk1EPL3OklsmClb3gc9L
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On today's Austin Group call, we discussed
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=3D802 regarding 'rm' behavior.

They pointed out that GNU has an optimization not allowed by a strict
reading of the current standard:

$ mkdir foo
$ rm -ir foo
rm: remove directory =E2=80=98foo=E2=80=99?

Whether you answer yes or no, the point remains: rm only prompted once
about removing the empty directory.  Compare that to other
implementations, such as Solaris:

$ rm -ir /tmp/foo
rm: examine files in directory /tmp/foo (yes/no)? y
rm: remove /tmp/foo (yes/no)? y
$

Note that the optimization implies that we did a readdir() on the
directory before deciding whether to prompt, in order to learn if it was
empty; and that readdir() modifies directory atime; in the Solaris
implementation, readdir() is not even attempted until after a positive
prompt response, which means directory atime is unchanged if the user
chooses not to descend.

Meanwhile, for a non-empty directory, we DO prompt twice for the director=
y:

$ touch foo/bar
$ rm -ir foo
rm: descend into directory =E2=80=98foo=E2=80=99? y
rm: remove regular empty file =E2=80=98foo/bar=E2=80=99? y
rm: remove directory =E2=80=98foo=E2=80=99?

Here, we get the POSIX-mandated double prompting, once to descend, and
once after recursion is complete to see whether to remove the now-empty
directory.  The argument is whether the GNU optimization of prompting
only once for an empty directory violates POSIX (and where it is
observable by a new directory atime), or whether we should patch POSIX
to allow the GNU optimization.  In the meeting, I ended up with an
action item to right the bug report against POSIX to propose wording
that would allow the GNU behavior.

Conversely, consider:

$ rm -ir foo
rm: descend into directory =E2=80=98foo=E2=80=99? y
rm: remove regular empty file =E2=80=98foo/bar=E2=80=99? n
rm: remove directory =E2=80=98foo=E2=80=99? y
rm: cannot remove =E2=80=98foo=E2=80=99: Directory not empty

Why on earth are we prompting to remove 'foo' when we KNOW it is
non-empty because the user specifically asked to not remove foo/bar?  If
we can optimize from two prompts down to one for the empty directory
case, why are we not optimizing and avoiding asking a useless prompt for
a known non-empty directory?  So, while writing my POSIX bug report,
should I also allow for an optimization of omitting the second prompt
for a known non-empty directory (known because of a negative answer to
prompts on its children), even though GNU does not yet implement that
optimization?

--=20
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

--Qk8SVxWqh6ir0Wk1EPL3OklsmClb3gc9L
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJS87quAAoJEKeha0olJ0NqL+wH/iZpJwMVYNm0gQAAaminC89T
GT8oQj3+OK90L933lei/2XSuoR+8oGhFvkk3/uoYiqRY0oTlavvUelRMcI/uv0V2
10+hFmyJSYQDZ7VS0BKrVYVSqyHTZI1xGDuzVBn4gYFtPFwRwVqbFStoKI4iOU1a
Zh2jNOPOcpbMMTeP61b2DaSdWAQSCfJf9aOnixsr7c+kyFE9FWjmKbrNPZp2fTOj
ff36Bfw/WW3dqq8khX1qgMzzwISj0NKYeiBX9Ll8K9JvM8q+Wvm2gYaZWLhKze0n
VhgeYvJYe4QpZO9FgQiLc4ijDccUdEfW3NmBJqBnUZpTRxURG97TZkHK29+GK2U=
=7wcC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Qk8SVxWqh6ir0Wk1EPL3OklsmClb3gc9L--

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.503 (Entity 5.503)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Eric Blake <eblake@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#16669: Acknowledgement (inconsistent 'rm -ir' prompting behavior)
Message-ID: <handler.16669.B.139170477330654.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <52F3BAAE.9060107@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 16669
X-Gnu-PR-Package: coreutils
Reply-To: 16669 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 16:40:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-coreutils@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 16669 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
16669: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D16669
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message sent to bug-coreutils@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#16669: inconsistent 'rm -ir' prompting behavior
Resent-From: Paul Eggert <eggert@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 17:04:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.16669.B16669.1391706240867 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Eric Blake <eblake@HIDDEN>, 16669 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Message-ID: <52F3C076.3080105@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 09:03:50 -0800
From: Paul Eggert <eggert@HIDDEN>
Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <52F3BAAE.9060107@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <52F3BAAE.9060107@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

On 02/06/2014 08:39 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> should I also allow for an optimization of omitting the second prompt
> for a known non-empty directory

I would, yes.  Thanks for catching that.

> (known because of a negative answer to
> prompts on its children)
It might also be known because of a failed attempt to remove a child, 
and this optimization should be allowed as well.

Message sent to bug-coreutils@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#16669: inconsistent 'rm -ir' prompting behavior
Resent-From: Eric Blake <eblake@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 17:34:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.16669.B16669.139170802712710 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Paul Eggert <eggert@HIDDEN>, 16669 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Message-ID: <52F3C76F.9070301@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 10:33:35 -0700
From: Eric Blake <eblake@HIDDEN>
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <52F3BAAE.9060107@HIDDEN> <52F3C076.3080105@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <52F3C076.3080105@HIDDEN>
OpenPGP: url=http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="Rp0Ltjnk1f1Jbw4hFlPB2NGDjtvixlO6O"
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--Rp0Ltjnk1f1Jbw4hFlPB2NGDjtvixlO6O
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 02/06/2014 10:03 AM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 02/06/2014 08:39 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> should I also allow for an optimization of omitting the second prompt
>> for a known non-empty directory
>=20
> I would, yes.  Thanks for catching that.
>=20
>> (known because of a negative answer to
>> prompts on its children)
> It might also be known because of a failed attempt to remove a child,
> and this optimization should be allowed as well.

http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=3D819 was created to attempt this,=

although it may need another round of word-smithing to make sure it is
correct for what we want.

--=20
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

--Rp0Ltjnk1f1Jbw4hFlPB2NGDjtvixlO6O
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJS88dvAAoJEKeha0olJ0NqqRQH/0e5xhxpjbsXUj71VARmFllp
3dzD4j55jcYR7cg0EKi9ehwKqX5F0o2J9cUgdg33KrA1fmtt6Ik8y0uOoFIu/yHM
QiceW3Gkgah964yht5HVuY7n0hYnfunk+erS62dibaSAHmhHmJSsSW0EhSGYHPMi
8deVq0b8kP6y/Nphe04zs4qTJ5NjJJoTQOyJ5F0De7LcZe/bgouQasL1gg+RuizG
LEKvwnHS2uxNzMAT4hWoOkZpk7HcpLTd1980c0J1KX5rdVOUvz3MLBpNc3/AzeVf
lKvZyNbis55JwnloPT2B72NUAftUMfHxc9x3lqawv/ySCeYBZtDdUMbldBjeSP0=
=upan
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Rp0Ltjnk1f1Jbw4hFlPB2NGDjtvixlO6O--

Message sent to bug-coreutils@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#16669: inconsistent 'rm -ir' prompting behavior
Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?P=C3=A1draig?= Brady <P@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 17:45:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.16669.B16669.139170865713832 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16669
X-GNU-PR-Package: coreutils
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Eric Blake <eblake@HIDDEN>
Cc: 16669 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 16669-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B16669.139170865713832
          (code B ref 16669); Thu, 06 Feb 2014 17:45:02 +0000
Received: (at 16669) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2014 17:44:17 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53636 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1WBSzp-0003b2-89
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 12:44:17 -0500
Received: from mail5.vodafone.ie ([213.233.128.176]:19861)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
 (envelope-from <P@HIDDEN>) id 1WBSzm-0003aq-0m
 for 16669 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 12:44:14 -0500
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApQBAK7J81Jda8mX/2dsb2JhbAANMhqDRINYu3CBIoMZAQEBAwEjDwFGBQsLDQEKAgIFFgsCAgkDAgECAUUGDQEHAQGHeQ0INqsXdqB4F4EpjVEHgm+BSQSZXYU+jl4
Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.1.79]) ([93.107.201.151])
 by mail3.vodafone.ie with ESMTP; 06 Feb 2014 17:44:12 +0000
Message-ID: <52F3C9EB.5060803@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 17:44:11 +0000
From: =?UTF-8?Q?P=C3=A1draig?= Brady <P@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <52F3BAAE.9060107@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <52F3BAAE.9060107@HIDDEN>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)

On 02/06/2014 04:39 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On today's Austin Group call, we discussed
> http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=802 regarding 'rm' behavior.
> 
> They pointed out that GNU has an optimization not allowed by a strict
> reading of the current standard:
> 
> $ mkdir foo
> $ rm -ir foo
> rm: remove directory ‘foo’?
> 
> Whether you answer yes or no, the point remains: rm only prompted once
> about removing the empty directory

[snip]

> Conversely, consider:
> 
> $ rm -ir foo
> rm: descend into directory ‘foo’? y
> rm: remove regular empty file ‘foo/bar’? n
> rm: remove directory ‘foo’? y
> rm: cannot remove ‘foo’: Directory not empty
> 
> Why on earth are we prompting to remove 'foo' when we KNOW it is
> non-empty because the user specifically asked to not remove foo/bar?  If
> we can optimize from two prompts down to one for the empty directory
> case, why are we not optimizing and avoiding asking a useless prompt for
> a known non-empty directory?

The different handling could be useful I think.

When we determine there are no files in a dir,
then only one prompt is necessary.

If we determine files are present a separate prompt
is useful to cater for the following sequence
in terminal 1 and terminal 2.

1> $ rm -ir foo
1> rm: descend into directory ‘foo’? y
1> rm: remove regular empty file ‘foo/bar’? n
1> rm: remove directory ‘foo’?

2> mv foo/bar /safe/foo  # Handle this unknown file _independently_

1> y

thanks,
Pádraig.

Message sent to bug-coreutils@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#16669: inconsistent 'rm -ir' prompting behavior
Resent-From: Assaf Gordon <assafgordon@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 23:35:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.16669.B16669.15399920593620 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16669
X-GNU-PR-Package: coreutils
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: =?UTF-8?Q?P=C3=A1draig?= Brady <P@HIDDEN>, Eric Blake <eblake@HIDDEN>
Cc: 16669 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 16669-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B16669.15399920593620
          (code B ref 16669); Fri, 19 Oct 2018 23:35:02 +0000
Received: (at 16669) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Oct 2018 23:34:19 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60006 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1gDeHb-0000wK-Jh
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 19:34:19 -0400
Received: from mail-pf1-f172.google.com ([209.85.210.172]:42098)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <assafgordon@HIDDEN>) id 1gDeHa-0000w4-0H
 for 16669 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 19:34:18 -0400
Received: by mail-pf1-f172.google.com with SMTP id f26-v6so17125312pfn.9
 for <16669 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 16:34:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent
 :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=qD9NcqMwpUppRTEHkbVtN5789ok/5LuQZsAwNMiIbdk=;
 b=hpmo/ErSh/YSaosoCF/W6oAR6k6JOP+J9r/woB2KP/uCqf7sled6rF6ekfXPT9ZQLm
 H/qM0qL4D2G+6r0M8MEuFyA3fMbPhszq4kpvw5JxIzpv6Zhm4XIuaczGI11R6GiCukJn
 i3GZYFf+CeCAnuv9FwCsnHCt8fi7U1yfvpIDDrF/PX1ZWeljdVQKYPHcOAT0lU5DDDig
 7IPyOux+K8IkOhqPzahyl25XyFwTNd8IWfH90UEv2dZE/1IKO6Wamp0s0pg0JhfIJAUp
 ZZiZ7l4fMxbdBwStF0P5NjCVp+WsJONA2QsT62vdvYcJE75K/gzEq5rQoVbLl8DbPrR0
 zE8w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date
 :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=qD9NcqMwpUppRTEHkbVtN5789ok/5LuQZsAwNMiIbdk=;
 b=VqaqqeAow1te+oauz9JxG0C8PtTpbfgOEnDtGiwISTgRAs5+UfFYlomTOk480gXmon
 eV0gi2kIQmtypC7tDTzcLvomhjCFB2EBcgilc662QCiHD02yJks72ag55kbbOwWJkVI3
 ssV361Wrva3NX2cmPeGbsl2DaN36XlAZA2rwli3bbsSInoLLffVwbVIsIW0SAkiHHKMu
 7IPeXAzf4H5BmVfDPL+Ee/nFpKjejWamJlYAD8NLP2H2GYboxmAKjeQOAOOmqnfRqdkc
 g6B+Uj5Z3zBASIigI9FEygo0ndY69SxO69uXLpYvOsO2yjsg1oS0R558InyREuN+YtG8
 L79w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfogVFjO6CwHDgQU2+r/+Y05PqwdX9gy5KNDSghU3Yb7zI67suxjv
 SeQjw45/z398+XdJ8iZQ8sVhQX7WWjE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV63beeLtZ4Yt4na9ZBfK1oMGZZrE8UIfda3hP0oGNSQYl/+mezTMNT+cXHPFNfKmcSJpDaC11w==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:be1a:: with SMTP id
 l26-v6mr37312859pff.204.1539992051566; 
 Fri, 19 Oct 2018 16:34:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tomato.housegordon.com (moose.housegordon.com. [184.68.105.38])
 by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id
 v33-v6sm22799800pgn.57.2018.10.19.16.34.09
 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Fri, 19 Oct 2018 16:34:09 -0700 (PDT)
References: <52F3BAAE.9060107@HIDDEN> <52F3C9EB.5060803@HIDDEN>
From: Assaf Gordon <assafgordon@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <041aa06d-a564-8080-e06f-52adc8180143@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 17:34:08 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <52F3C9EB.5060803@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

(triaging old bugs)

Eric, Pádraig,

On 06/02/14 10:44 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 02/06/2014 04:39 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On today's Austin Group call, we discussed
>> http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=802 regarding 'rm' behavior.
>>

Was there ever a resolution (or a committed fix)
for the "rm -ir" issue in:
   https://bugs.gnu.org/16669


-assaf

Message sent to bug-coreutils@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#16669: inconsistent 'rm -ir' prompting behavior
Resent-From: Paul Eggert <eggert@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 00:09:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.16669.B16669.154008051122950 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16669
X-GNU-PR-Package: coreutils
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Assaf Gordon <assafgordon@HIDDEN>, =?UTF-8?Q?P=C3=A1draig?= Brady <P@HIDDEN>, Eric Blake <eblake@HIDDEN>
Cc: 16669 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 16669-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B16669.154008051122950
          (code B ref 16669); Sun, 21 Oct 2018 00:09:02 +0000
Received: (at 16669) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Oct 2018 00:08:31 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33633 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1gE1IF-0005y6-7u
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 20:08:31 -0400
Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:53180)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <eggert@HIDDEN>) id 1gE1IE-0005xu-4J
 for 16669 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 20:08:30 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A877016005D;
 Sat, 20 Oct 2018 17:08:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032)
 with ESMTP id krLfds-svggj; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 17:08:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0BAA160061;
 Sat, 20 Oct 2018 17:08:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu
Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026)
 with ESMTP id 6AavfP4f1pj9; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 17:08:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.9] (cpe-23-242-74-103.socal.res.rr.com
 [23.242.74.103])
 by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 76B1C16005D;
 Sat, 20 Oct 2018 17:08:23 -0700 (PDT)
References: <52F3BAAE.9060107@HIDDEN> <52F3C9EB.5060803@HIDDEN>
 <041aa06d-a564-8080-e06f-52adc8180143@HIDDEN>
From: Paul Eggert <eggert@HIDDEN>
Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department
Message-ID: <38cf4fba-173c-2e9e-79c4-96918ec9f4d4@HIDDEN>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2018 17:08:23 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <041aa06d-a564-8080-e06f-52adc8180143@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Assaf Gordon wrote:
> Was there ever a resolution (or a committed fix)
> for the "rm -ir" issue in:
> https://bugs.gnu.org/16669

Not yet. I'd leave the bug open.

Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Oct 2018 21:27:17 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 21 17:27:17 2018
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34732 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1gELFl-00052k-9a
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 17:27:17 -0400
Received: from mail-it1-f169.google.com ([209.85.166.169]:32968)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <assafgordon@HIDDEN>) id 1gELFj-00052W-I5
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 17:27:15 -0400
Received: by mail-it1-f169.google.com with SMTP id h6-v6so8351478ith.0
 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 14:27:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=to:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-language
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=NgArvbymXgYeMXBFvzbrCQDZnfialF41i3r1oMUNeOA=;
 b=fXd38sRjUhdWR+IzpCEggmpNO65PEz6Q0k1Bw4LzWTOE0GoRBWm68HdDGVL4EwLOY6
 AQ84UdX+QkwFWOrC7geJSqTqvNyuOCvUc7UmCfHULgcBdmmUTnI5BpTD9t9PiVIJsoVF
 TDrJtt7jj1kQw2f4+wc3Z2EWaG2DovxmtBSIbIcosiJuJPhAaCArTsbKwwdEF1hks6WT
 f+pqJI67Cv1k8F0JxXoqT4g2idVyl/MRON2FJRd+Zeo2RkAHTVp/kpaZadZLlXTq0UUn
 MEdbqzwG6tdKrtQEFPPW1oUpWx+YVir5wSweK4mzElaIQerVZT12IssHWhEIs6hMPvBI
 g+dA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version
 :content-language:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=NgArvbymXgYeMXBFvzbrCQDZnfialF41i3r1oMUNeOA=;
 b=DE11lrqnwR+F/20qk5ORmSdMFWFhtbIc7Li1j44ShOM3CYNol1Wc683SiLl/qdCCq5
 ZJ2i3iwQCvK9npyJrAzPGuS4T6krv+jQlZc2arUVptDAN6HFkhoIXShfOrKST7x2J6J8
 715zSuwPx4c7ZLYjNp8JPIgB0lEfFyvOKwgzACdbT7NDxdvJQ5z9iDcSCegRYSftZBPm
 351BrhyEaaHAkGaHbKcFIjaUAd78Rdab1yyD017bgDX9msI2hZp1dEP4WGFLQDgLd64a
 SwYaERCcaa8SHA3UuWTgOVWJbv068m7up4YnCGHtVFZgg6Jm90J1LmxY/z6UoxL5CxbN
 nq/w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfogpxWGKZGtuRAKmLgnW3Q2/+FQmudgRULHxgYaDDXB91M4hsMqK
 KohMzbmESKO1jR68j45/RrruZXfq
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV63vH0AbpKhS36BWycBcTDaxNXtOXYXgLpvwTLpSsCTFC2zrJUncaEIMyy7E/fk2zMwAlVqxIQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a24:94d:: with SMTP id 74-v6mr7969509itm.178.1540157229663; 
 Sun, 21 Oct 2018 14:27:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tomato.housegordon.com (moose.housegordon.com. [184.68.105.38])
 by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id
 h123-v6sm4042959ith.21.2018.10.21.14.27.07
 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Sun, 21 Oct 2018 14:27:08 -0700 (PDT)
To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Assaf Gordon <assafgordon@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <92e2fa28-52d5-351b-b86a-ebd88433ae09@HIDDEN>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 15:27:06 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview:  severity 16669 wishlist tags 16669 confirmed retitle 16669
 rm: inconsistent 'rm -ir' prompting behavior (POSIX issue) [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (2.0 points, 10.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
 (assafgordon[at]gmail.com)
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no
 trust [209.85.166.169 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2      RBL: Average reputation (+2)
 [209.85.166.169 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT        Missing Subject: header
 0.2 NO_SUBJECT             Extra score for no subject
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)

severity 16669 wishlist
tags 16669 confirmed
retitle 16669 rm: inconsistent 'rm -ir' prompting behavior (POSIX issue)

Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Oct 2018 21:27:17 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 21 17:27:17 2018
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34732 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1gELFl-00052k-9a
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 17:27:17 -0400
Received: from mail-it1-f169.google.com ([209.85.166.169]:32968)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <assafgordon@HIDDEN>) id 1gELFj-00052W-I5
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 17:27:15 -0400
Received: by mail-it1-f169.google.com with SMTP id h6-v6so8351478ith.0
 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 14:27:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=to:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-language
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=NgArvbymXgYeMXBFvzbrCQDZnfialF41i3r1oMUNeOA=;
 b=fXd38sRjUhdWR+IzpCEggmpNO65PEz6Q0k1Bw4LzWTOE0GoRBWm68HdDGVL4EwLOY6
 AQ84UdX+QkwFWOrC7geJSqTqvNyuOCvUc7UmCfHULgcBdmmUTnI5BpTD9t9PiVIJsoVF
 TDrJtt7jj1kQw2f4+wc3Z2EWaG2DovxmtBSIbIcosiJuJPhAaCArTsbKwwdEF1hks6WT
 f+pqJI67Cv1k8F0JxXoqT4g2idVyl/MRON2FJRd+Zeo2RkAHTVp/kpaZadZLlXTq0UUn
 MEdbqzwG6tdKrtQEFPPW1oUpWx+YVir5wSweK4mzElaIQerVZT12IssHWhEIs6hMPvBI
 g+dA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version
 :content-language:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=NgArvbymXgYeMXBFvzbrCQDZnfialF41i3r1oMUNeOA=;
 b=DE11lrqnwR+F/20qk5ORmSdMFWFhtbIc7Li1j44ShOM3CYNol1Wc683SiLl/qdCCq5
 ZJ2i3iwQCvK9npyJrAzPGuS4T6krv+jQlZc2arUVptDAN6HFkhoIXShfOrKST7x2J6J8
 715zSuwPx4c7ZLYjNp8JPIgB0lEfFyvOKwgzACdbT7NDxdvJQ5z9iDcSCegRYSftZBPm
 351BrhyEaaHAkGaHbKcFIjaUAd78Rdab1yyD017bgDX9msI2hZp1dEP4WGFLQDgLd64a
 SwYaERCcaa8SHA3UuWTgOVWJbv068m7up4YnCGHtVFZgg6Jm90J1LmxY/z6UoxL5CxbN
 nq/w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfogpxWGKZGtuRAKmLgnW3Q2/+FQmudgRULHxgYaDDXB91M4hsMqK
 KohMzbmESKO1jR68j45/RrruZXfq
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV63vH0AbpKhS36BWycBcTDaxNXtOXYXgLpvwTLpSsCTFC2zrJUncaEIMyy7E/fk2zMwAlVqxIQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a24:94d:: with SMTP id 74-v6mr7969509itm.178.1540157229663; 
 Sun, 21 Oct 2018 14:27:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tomato.housegordon.com (moose.housegordon.com. [184.68.105.38])
 by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id
 h123-v6sm4042959ith.21.2018.10.21.14.27.07
 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Sun, 21 Oct 2018 14:27:08 -0700 (PDT)
To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Assaf Gordon <assafgordon@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <92e2fa28-52d5-351b-b86a-ebd88433ae09@HIDDEN>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 15:27:06 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview:  severity 16669 wishlist tags 16669 confirmed retitle 16669
 rm: inconsistent 'rm -ir' prompting behavior (POSIX issue) [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (2.0 points, 10.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
 (assafgordon[at]gmail.com)
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no
 trust [209.85.166.169 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2      RBL: Average reputation (+2)
 [209.85.166.169 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT        Missing Subject: header
 0.2 NO_SUBJECT             Extra score for no subject
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)

severity 16669 wishlist
tags 16669 confirmed
retitle 16669 rm: inconsistent 'rm -ir' prompting behavior (POSIX issue)

Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Oct 2018 21:27:17 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 21 17:27:17 2018
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34732 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1gELFl-00052k-9a
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 17:27:17 -0400
Received: from mail-it1-f169.google.com ([209.85.166.169]:32968)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <assafgordon@HIDDEN>) id 1gELFj-00052W-I5
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 17:27:15 -0400
Received: by mail-it1-f169.google.com with SMTP id h6-v6so8351478ith.0
 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 14:27:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=to:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-language
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=NgArvbymXgYeMXBFvzbrCQDZnfialF41i3r1oMUNeOA=;
 b=fXd38sRjUhdWR+IzpCEggmpNO65PEz6Q0k1Bw4LzWTOE0GoRBWm68HdDGVL4EwLOY6
 AQ84UdX+QkwFWOrC7geJSqTqvNyuOCvUc7UmCfHULgcBdmmUTnI5BpTD9t9PiVIJsoVF
 TDrJtt7jj1kQw2f4+wc3Z2EWaG2DovxmtBSIbIcosiJuJPhAaCArTsbKwwdEF1hks6WT
 f+pqJI67Cv1k8F0JxXoqT4g2idVyl/MRON2FJRd+Zeo2RkAHTVp/kpaZadZLlXTq0UUn
 MEdbqzwG6tdKrtQEFPPW1oUpWx+YVir5wSweK4mzElaIQerVZT12IssHWhEIs6hMPvBI
 g+dA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version
 :content-language:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=NgArvbymXgYeMXBFvzbrCQDZnfialF41i3r1oMUNeOA=;
 b=DE11lrqnwR+F/20qk5ORmSdMFWFhtbIc7Li1j44ShOM3CYNol1Wc683SiLl/qdCCq5
 ZJ2i3iwQCvK9npyJrAzPGuS4T6krv+jQlZc2arUVptDAN6HFkhoIXShfOrKST7x2J6J8
 715zSuwPx4c7ZLYjNp8JPIgB0lEfFyvOKwgzACdbT7NDxdvJQ5z9iDcSCegRYSftZBPm
 351BrhyEaaHAkGaHbKcFIjaUAd78Rdab1yyD017bgDX9msI2hZp1dEP4WGFLQDgLd64a
 SwYaERCcaa8SHA3UuWTgOVWJbv068m7up4YnCGHtVFZgg6Jm90J1LmxY/z6UoxL5CxbN
 nq/w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfogpxWGKZGtuRAKmLgnW3Q2/+FQmudgRULHxgYaDDXB91M4hsMqK
 KohMzbmESKO1jR68j45/RrruZXfq
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV63vH0AbpKhS36BWycBcTDaxNXtOXYXgLpvwTLpSsCTFC2zrJUncaEIMyy7E/fk2zMwAlVqxIQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a24:94d:: with SMTP id 74-v6mr7969509itm.178.1540157229663; 
 Sun, 21 Oct 2018 14:27:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tomato.housegordon.com (moose.housegordon.com. [184.68.105.38])
 by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id
 h123-v6sm4042959ith.21.2018.10.21.14.27.07
 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Sun, 21 Oct 2018 14:27:08 -0700 (PDT)
To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Assaf Gordon <assafgordon@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <92e2fa28-52d5-351b-b86a-ebd88433ae09@HIDDEN>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 15:27:06 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview:  severity 16669 wishlist tags 16669 confirmed retitle 16669
 rm: inconsistent 'rm -ir' prompting behavior (POSIX issue) [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (2.0 points, 10.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
 (assafgordon[at]gmail.com)
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no
 trust [209.85.166.169 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2      RBL: Average reputation (+2)
 [209.85.166.169 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT        Missing Subject: header
 0.2 NO_SUBJECT             Extra score for no subject
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)

severity 16669 wishlist
tags 16669 confirmed
retitle 16669 rm: inconsistent 'rm -ir' prompting behavior (POSIX issue)

Last modified: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 12:00:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.