Assaf Gordon <assafgordon@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
Full text available.Assaf Gordon <assafgordon@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
Full text available.Assaf Gordon <assafgordon@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
Full text available.Received: (at 16669) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Oct 2018 00:08:31 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat Oct 20 20:08:31 2018 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33633 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gE1IF-0005y6-7u for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 20:08:31 -0400 Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:53180) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <eggert@HIDDEN>) id 1gE1IE-0005xu-4J for 16669 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 20:08:30 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A877016005D; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 17:08:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id krLfds-svggj; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 17:08:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0BAA160061; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 17:08:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 6AavfP4f1pj9; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 17:08:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.9] (cpe-23-242-74-103.socal.res.rr.com [23.242.74.103]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 76B1C16005D; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 17:08:23 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: bug#16669: inconsistent 'rm -ir' prompting behavior To: Assaf Gordon <assafgordon@HIDDEN>, =?UTF-8?Q?P=c3=a1draig_Brady?= <P@HIDDEN>, Eric Blake <eblake@HIDDEN> References: <52F3BAAE.9060107@HIDDEN> <52F3C9EB.5060803@HIDDEN> <041aa06d-a564-8080-e06f-52adc8180143@HIDDEN> From: Paul Eggert <eggert@HIDDEN> Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: <38cf4fba-173c-2e9e-79c4-96918ec9f4d4@HIDDEN> Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2018 17:08:23 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <041aa06d-a564-8080-e06f-52adc8180143@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16669 Cc: 16669 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Assaf Gordon wrote: > Was there ever a resolution (or a committed fix) > for the "rm -ir" issue in: > https://bugs.gnu.org/16669 Not yet. I'd leave the bug open.
bug-coreutils@HIDDEN
:bug#16669
; Package coreutils
.
Full text available.Received: (at 16669) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Oct 2018 23:34:19 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Oct 19 19:34:19 2018 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60006 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gDeHb-0000wK-Jh for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 19:34:19 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f172.google.com ([209.85.210.172]:42098) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <assafgordon@HIDDEN>) id 1gDeHa-0000w4-0H for 16669 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 19:34:18 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f172.google.com with SMTP id f26-v6so17125312pfn.9 for <16669 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 16:34:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qD9NcqMwpUppRTEHkbVtN5789ok/5LuQZsAwNMiIbdk=; b=hpmo/ErSh/YSaosoCF/W6oAR6k6JOP+J9r/woB2KP/uCqf7sled6rF6ekfXPT9ZQLm H/qM0qL4D2G+6r0M8MEuFyA3fMbPhszq4kpvw5JxIzpv6Zhm4XIuaczGI11R6GiCukJn i3GZYFf+CeCAnuv9FwCsnHCt8fi7U1yfvpIDDrF/PX1ZWeljdVQKYPHcOAT0lU5DDDig 7IPyOux+K8IkOhqPzahyl25XyFwTNd8IWfH90UEv2dZE/1IKO6Wamp0s0pg0JhfIJAUp ZZiZ7l4fMxbdBwStF0P5NjCVp+WsJONA2QsT62vdvYcJE75K/gzEq5rQoVbLl8DbPrR0 zE8w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qD9NcqMwpUppRTEHkbVtN5789ok/5LuQZsAwNMiIbdk=; b=VqaqqeAow1te+oauz9JxG0C8PtTpbfgOEnDtGiwISTgRAs5+UfFYlomTOk480gXmon eV0gi2kIQmtypC7tDTzcLvomhjCFB2EBcgilc662QCiHD02yJks72ag55kbbOwWJkVI3 ssV361Wrva3NX2cmPeGbsl2DaN36XlAZA2rwli3bbsSInoLLffVwbVIsIW0SAkiHHKMu 7IPeXAzf4H5BmVfDPL+Ee/nFpKjejWamJlYAD8NLP2H2GYboxmAKjeQOAOOmqnfRqdkc g6B+Uj5Z3zBASIigI9FEygo0ndY69SxO69uXLpYvOsO2yjsg1oS0R558InyREuN+YtG8 L79w== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfogVFjO6CwHDgQU2+r/+Y05PqwdX9gy5KNDSghU3Yb7zI67suxjv SeQjw45/z398+XdJ8iZQ8sVhQX7WWjE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV63beeLtZ4Yt4na9ZBfK1oMGZZrE8UIfda3hP0oGNSQYl/+mezTMNT+cXHPFNfKmcSJpDaC11w== X-Received: by 2002:a62:be1a:: with SMTP id l26-v6mr37312859pff.204.1539992051566; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 16:34:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tomato.housegordon.com (moose.housegordon.com. [184.68.105.38]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id v33-v6sm22799800pgn.57.2018.10.19.16.34.09 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 19 Oct 2018 16:34:09 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: bug#16669: inconsistent 'rm -ir' prompting behavior To: =?UTF-8?Q?P=c3=a1draig_Brady?= <P@HIDDEN>, Eric Blake <eblake@HIDDEN> References: <52F3BAAE.9060107@HIDDEN> <52F3C9EB.5060803@HIDDEN> From: Assaf Gordon <assafgordon@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <041aa06d-a564-8080-e06f-52adc8180143@HIDDEN> Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 17:34:08 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <52F3C9EB.5060803@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16669 Cc: 16669 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) (triaging old bugs) Eric, Pádraig, On 06/02/14 10:44 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 02/06/2014 04:39 PM, Eric Blake wrote: >> On today's Austin Group call, we discussed >> http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=802 regarding 'rm' behavior. >> Was there ever a resolution (or a committed fix) for the "rm -ir" issue in: https://bugs.gnu.org/16669 -assaf
bug-coreutils@HIDDEN
:bug#16669
; Package coreutils
.
Full text available.Received: (at 16669) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2014 17:44:17 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 06 12:44:17 2014 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53636 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1WBSzp-0003b2-89 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 12:44:17 -0500 Received: from mail5.vodafone.ie ([213.233.128.176]:19861) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <P@HIDDEN>) id 1WBSzm-0003aq-0m for 16669 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 12:44:14 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApQBAK7J81Jda8mX/2dsb2JhbAANMhqDRINYu3CBIoMZAQEBAwEjDwFGBQsLDQEKAgIFFgsCAgkDAgECAUUGDQEHAQGHeQ0INqsXdqB4F4EpjVEHgm+BSQSZXYU+jl4 Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.1.79]) ([93.107.201.151]) by mail3.vodafone.ie with ESMTP; 06 Feb 2014 17:44:12 +0000 Message-ID: <52F3C9EB.5060803@HIDDEN> Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 17:44:11 +0000 From: =?UTF-8?B?UMOhZHJhaWcgQnJhZHk=?= <P@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric Blake <eblake@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#16669: inconsistent 'rm -ir' prompting behavior References: <52F3BAAE.9060107@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <52F3BAAE.9060107@HIDDEN> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16669 Cc: 16669 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) On 02/06/2014 04:39 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > On today's Austin Group call, we discussed > http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=802 regarding 'rm' behavior. > > They pointed out that GNU has an optimization not allowed by a strict > reading of the current standard: > > $ mkdir foo > $ rm -ir foo > rm: remove directory ‘foo’? > > Whether you answer yes or no, the point remains: rm only prompted once > about removing the empty directory [snip] > Conversely, consider: > > $ rm -ir foo > rm: descend into directory ‘foo’? y > rm: remove regular empty file ‘foo/bar’? n > rm: remove directory ‘foo’? y > rm: cannot remove ‘foo’: Directory not empty > > Why on earth are we prompting to remove 'foo' when we KNOW it is > non-empty because the user specifically asked to not remove foo/bar? If > we can optimize from two prompts down to one for the empty directory > case, why are we not optimizing and avoiding asking a useless prompt for > a known non-empty directory? The different handling could be useful I think. When we determine there are no files in a dir, then only one prompt is necessary. If we determine files are present a separate prompt is useful to cater for the following sequence in terminal 1 and terminal 2. 1> $ rm -ir foo 1> rm: descend into directory ‘foo’? y 1> rm: remove regular empty file ‘foo/bar’? n 1> rm: remove directory ‘foo’? 2> mv foo/bar /safe/foo # Handle this unknown file _independently_ 1> y thanks, Pádraig.
bug-coreutils@HIDDEN
:bug#16669
; Package coreutils
.
Full text available.Received: (at 16669) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2014 17:33:47 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 06 12:33:47 2014 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53631 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1WBSpf-0003Iv-6G for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 12:33:47 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:29430) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <eblake@HIDDEN>) id 1WBSpc-0003Ik-PZ for 16669 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 12:33:46 -0500 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s16HXaFF021303 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 6 Feb 2014 12:33:36 -0500 Received: from [10.3.113.39] (ovpn-113-39.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.39]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s16HXZev005295; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 12:33:35 -0500 Message-ID: <52F3C76F.9070301@HIDDEN> Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 10:33:35 -0700 From: Eric Blake <eblake@HIDDEN> Organization: Red Hat, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Eggert <eggert@HIDDEN>, 16669 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#16669: inconsistent 'rm -ir' prompting behavior References: <52F3BAAE.9060107@HIDDEN> <52F3C076.3080105@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <52F3C076.3080105@HIDDEN> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 OpenPGP: url=http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Rp0Ltjnk1f1Jbw4hFlPB2NGDjtvixlO6O" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.24 X-Spam-Score: -5.5 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16669 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -5.5 (-----) This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --Rp0Ltjnk1f1Jbw4hFlPB2NGDjtvixlO6O Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/06/2014 10:03 AM, Paul Eggert wrote: > On 02/06/2014 08:39 AM, Eric Blake wrote: >> should I also allow for an optimization of omitting the second prompt >> for a known non-empty directory >=20 > I would, yes. Thanks for catching that. >=20 >> (known because of a negative answer to >> prompts on its children) > It might also be known because of a failed attempt to remove a child, > and this optimization should be allowed as well. http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=3D819 was created to attempt this,= although it may need another round of word-smithing to make sure it is correct for what we want. --=20 Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org --Rp0Ltjnk1f1Jbw4hFlPB2NGDjtvixlO6O Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJS88dvAAoJEKeha0olJ0NqqRQH/0e5xhxpjbsXUj71VARmFllp 3dzD4j55jcYR7cg0EKi9ehwKqX5F0o2J9cUgdg33KrA1fmtt6Ik8y0uOoFIu/yHM QiceW3Gkgah964yht5HVuY7n0hYnfunk+erS62dibaSAHmhHmJSsSW0EhSGYHPMi 8deVq0b8kP6y/Nphe04zs4qTJ5NjJJoTQOyJ5F0De7LcZe/bgouQasL1gg+RuizG LEKvwnHS2uxNzMAT4hWoOkZpk7HcpLTd1980c0J1KX5rdVOUvz3MLBpNc3/AzeVf lKvZyNbis55JwnloPT2B72NUAftUMfHxc9x3lqawv/ySCeYBZtDdUMbldBjeSP0= =upan -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Rp0Ltjnk1f1Jbw4hFlPB2NGDjtvixlO6O--
bug-coreutils@HIDDEN
:bug#16669
; Package coreutils
.
Full text available.Received: (at 16669) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2014 17:04:00 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 06 12:04:00 2014 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53591 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1WBSMp-0000Du-It for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 12:04:00 -0500 Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.62]:42445) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <eggert@HIDDEN>) id 1WBSMm-0000Dl-8o for 16669 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 12:03:57 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04C2EA60001; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 09:03:55 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp.cs.ucla.edu Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AgOxn-ylfv7o; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 09:03:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from penguin.cs.ucla.edu (Penguin.CS.UCLA.EDU [131.179.64.200]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A9A9239E8017; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 09:03:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52F3C076.3080105@HIDDEN> Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 09:03:50 -0800 From: Paul Eggert <eggert@HIDDEN> Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric Blake <eblake@HIDDEN>, 16669 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#16669: inconsistent 'rm -ir' prompting behavior References: <52F3BAAE.9060107@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <52F3BAAE.9060107@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16669 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) On 02/06/2014 08:39 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > should I also allow for an optimization of omitting the second prompt > for a known non-empty directory I would, yes. Thanks for catching that. > (known because of a negative answer to > prompts on its children) It might also be known because of a failed attempt to remove a child, and this optimization should be allowed as well.
bug-coreutils@HIDDEN
:bug#16669
; Package coreutils
.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2014 16:39:33 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 06 11:39:33 2014 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53575 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1WBRzA-0007yK-FY for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 11:39:33 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34425) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <eblake@HIDDEN>) id 1WBRz6-0007y8-KD for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 11:39:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eblake@HIDDEN>) id 1WBRz1-0007p3-Ga for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 11:39:28 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:55899) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eblake@HIDDEN>) id 1WBRz1-0007oz-ED for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 11:39:23 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36091) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eblake@HIDDEN>) id 1WBRyw-0006hk-PO for bug-coreutils@HIDDEN; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 11:39:23 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eblake@HIDDEN>) id 1WBRys-0007mo-9d for bug-coreutils@HIDDEN; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 11:39:18 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:15597) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eblake@HIDDEN>) id 1WBRys-0007mC-1U for bug-coreutils@HIDDEN; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 11:39:14 -0500 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s16GdB37029554 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for <bug-coreutils@HIDDEN>; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 11:39:12 -0500 Received: from [10.3.113.39] (ovpn-113-39.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.39]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s16GdAOw020321 for <bug-coreutils@HIDDEN>; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 11:39:11 -0500 Message-ID: <52F3BAAE.9060107@HIDDEN> Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 09:39:10 -0700 From: Eric Blake <eblake@HIDDEN> Organization: Red Hat, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bug-coreutils@HIDDEN Subject: inconsistent 'rm -ir' prompting behavior X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 OpenPGP: url=http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qk8SVxWqh6ir0Wk1EPL3OklsmClb3gc9L" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.11.12 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --Qk8SVxWqh6ir0Wk1EPL3OklsmClb3gc9L Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On today's Austin Group call, we discussed http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=3D802 regarding 'rm' behavior. They pointed out that GNU has an optimization not allowed by a strict reading of the current standard: $ mkdir foo $ rm -ir foo rm: remove directory =E2=80=98foo=E2=80=99? Whether you answer yes or no, the point remains: rm only prompted once about removing the empty directory. Compare that to other implementations, such as Solaris: $ rm -ir /tmp/foo rm: examine files in directory /tmp/foo (yes/no)? y rm: remove /tmp/foo (yes/no)? y $ Note that the optimization implies that we did a readdir() on the directory before deciding whether to prompt, in order to learn if it was empty; and that readdir() modifies directory atime; in the Solaris implementation, readdir() is not even attempted until after a positive prompt response, which means directory atime is unchanged if the user chooses not to descend. Meanwhile, for a non-empty directory, we DO prompt twice for the director= y: $ touch foo/bar $ rm -ir foo rm: descend into directory =E2=80=98foo=E2=80=99? y rm: remove regular empty file =E2=80=98foo/bar=E2=80=99? y rm: remove directory =E2=80=98foo=E2=80=99? Here, we get the POSIX-mandated double prompting, once to descend, and once after recursion is complete to see whether to remove the now-empty directory. The argument is whether the GNU optimization of prompting only once for an empty directory violates POSIX (and where it is observable by a new directory atime), or whether we should patch POSIX to allow the GNU optimization. In the meeting, I ended up with an action item to right the bug report against POSIX to propose wording that would allow the GNU behavior. Conversely, consider: $ rm -ir foo rm: descend into directory =E2=80=98foo=E2=80=99? y rm: remove regular empty file =E2=80=98foo/bar=E2=80=99? n rm: remove directory =E2=80=98foo=E2=80=99? y rm: cannot remove =E2=80=98foo=E2=80=99: Directory not empty Why on earth are we prompting to remove 'foo' when we KNOW it is non-empty because the user specifically asked to not remove foo/bar? If we can optimize from two prompts down to one for the empty directory case, why are we not optimizing and avoiding asking a useless prompt for a known non-empty directory? So, while writing my POSIX bug report, should I also allow for an optimization of omitting the second prompt for a known non-empty directory (known because of a negative answer to prompts on its children), even though GNU does not yet implement that optimization? --=20 Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org --Qk8SVxWqh6ir0Wk1EPL3OklsmClb3gc9L Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJS87quAAoJEKeha0olJ0NqL+wH/iZpJwMVYNm0gQAAaminC89T GT8oQj3+OK90L933lei/2XSuoR+8oGhFvkk3/uoYiqRY0oTlavvUelRMcI/uv0V2 10+hFmyJSYQDZ7VS0BKrVYVSqyHTZI1xGDuzVBn4gYFtPFwRwVqbFStoKI4iOU1a Zh2jNOPOcpbMMTeP61b2DaSdWAQSCfJf9aOnixsr7c+kyFE9FWjmKbrNPZp2fTOj ff36Bfw/WW3dqq8khX1qgMzzwISj0NKYeiBX9Ll8K9JvM8q+Wvm2gYaZWLhKze0n VhgeYvJYe4QpZO9FgQiLc4ijDccUdEfW3NmBJqBnUZpTRxURG97TZkHK29+GK2U= =7wcC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Qk8SVxWqh6ir0Wk1EPL3OklsmClb3gc9L--
Eric Blake <eblake@HIDDEN>
:bug-coreutils@HIDDEN
.
Full text available.bug-coreutils@HIDDEN
:bug#16669
; Package coreutils
.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.