GNU logs - #23739, boring messages

Message sent to bug-guile@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#23739: Unexpected behavior of 'add-to-load-path'.
Resent-From: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guile@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 12:18:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.23739.B.146556106626607 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 23739 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 14:17:23 +0200
Message-ID: <878tydck6k.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

Hello,

I have noticed something that doesn't feel right when using
=E2=80=98add-to-load-path=E2=80=99.

$ cat test.scm
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(define old %load-path)
(add-to-load-path "foo")
(pk %load-path)
(pk old)
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

first run:

$ guile test.scm
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
;;; [Compilation]
;;; (("foo" "foo" "/usr/share/guile/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/site/2.0" "/usr/=
share/guile/site" "/usr/share/guile"))

;;; (("foo" "/usr/share/guile/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/site/2.0" "/usr/share/=
guile/site" "/usr/share/guile"))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

next runs:

$ guile test.scm
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
;;; (("foo" "/usr/share/guile/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/site/2.0" "/usr/share/=
guile/site" "/usr/share/guile"))

;;; (("/usr/share/guile/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/site/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/=
site" "/usr/share/guile"))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

each time test.scm is recompiled the first result reappears.  This has
been tested with Guile 2.0.11 and Guile master.

Thanks,

--=20
Mathieu Lirzin

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#23739: Acknowledgement (Unexpected behavior of
 'add-to-load-path'.)
Message-ID: <handler.23739.B.146556106626607.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <878tydck6k.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 23739
X-Gnu-PR-Package: guile
Reply-To: 23739 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 12:18:01 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-guile@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 23739 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
23739: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D23739
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message sent to bug-guile@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#23739: Unexpected behavior of 'add-to-load-path'.
Resent-From: <tomas@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guile@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 13:42:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.23739.B23739.14655661102034 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@HIDDEN>
Cc: 23739 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:41:43 +0200
Message-ID: <20160610134143.GA8848@HIDDEN>
References: <878tydck6k.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; x-action=pgp-signed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <878tydck6k.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
From: <tomas@HIDDEN>
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 02:17:23PM +0200, Mathieu Lirzin wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I have noticed something that doesn't feel right when using
> ‘add-to-load-path’.
> 
> $ cat test.scm
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> (define old %load-path)
> (add-to-load-path "foo")
> (pk %load-path)
> (pk old)
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> 
> first run:
> 
> $ guile test.scm
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> ;;; [Compilation]
> ;;; (("foo" "foo" "/usr/share/guile/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/site/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/site" "/usr/share/guile"))
> 
> ;;; (("foo" "/usr/share/guile/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/site/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/site" "/usr/share/guile"))
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> 
> next runs:
> 
> $ guile test.scm
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> ;;; (("foo" "/usr/share/guile/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/site/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/site" "/usr/share/guile"))
> 
> ;;; (("/usr/share/guile/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/site/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/site" "/usr/share/guile"))
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

I can confirm half of it :-)

I mean: the double entry "foo" for %load-path in your first result
above doesn't happen for me. Could that be a typo?

As for the strangely different behaviour when running pre-compiled
(old has %load-path's old value) and compiling (old has %load-path's
value after (add-to-load-path ...) yes, that happens to me too, on

  tomas@rasputin:/tmp$ guile --version
  guile (GNU Guile) 2.0.11.133-d680
  Copyright (C) 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

Looks like a bug to me.

regards
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAldaw5cACgkQBcgs9XrR2kZmoACfd8HliwAbrWdo3xK1jm44aIkQ
yPYAnj9MoF0OanAUD46iOnAoLLA1qrVu
=zuV2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Message sent to bug-guile@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#23739: Unexpected behavior of 'add-to-load-path'.
Resent-From: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guile@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:20:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.23739.B23739.146557197412042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: <tomas@HIDDEN>
Cc: 23739 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@HIDDEN>
References: <878tydck6k.fsf@HIDDEN> <20160610134143.GA8848@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 17:19:02 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20160610134143.GA8848@HIDDEN> (tomas@HIDDEN's message of
 "Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:41:43 +0200")
Message-ID: <874m91cbrt.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

<tomas@HIDDEN> writes:

> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 02:17:23PM +0200, Mathieu Lirzin wrote:
>> Hello,
>>=20
>> I have noticed something that doesn't feel right when using
>> =E2=80=98add-to-load-path=E2=80=99.
>>=20
>> $ cat test.scm
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>> (define old %load-path)
>> (add-to-load-path "foo")
>> (pk %load-path)
>> (pk old)
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>>=20
>> first run:
>>=20
>> $ guile test.scm
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>> ;;; [Compilation]
>> ;;; (("foo" "foo" "/usr/share/guile/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/site/2.0" "/u=
sr/share/guile/site" "/usr/share/guile"))
>>=20
>> ;;; (("foo" "/usr/share/guile/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/site/2.0" "/usr/sha=
re/guile/site" "/usr/share/guile"))
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>>=20
>> next runs:
>>=20
>> $ guile test.scm
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>> ;;; (("foo" "/usr/share/guile/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/site/2.0" "/usr/sha=
re/guile/site" "/usr/share/guile"))
>>=20
>> ;;; (("/usr/share/guile/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/site/2.0" "/usr/share/gui=
le/site" "/usr/share/guile"))
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> I can confirm half of it :-)
>
> I mean: the double entry "foo" for %load-path in your first result
> above doesn't happen for me. Could that be a typo?

My report was partially correct indeed.  There are two added entries in
=E2=80=98%load-path=E2=80=99 with Guile from Debian testing:

$ guile --version
guile (GNU Guile) 2.0.11
Packaged by Debian (2.0.11-deb+1-10+b1)
Copyright (C) 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

but only one with guile master:

$ meta/guile --version
guile (GNU Guile) 2.1.2.191-6788f
Copyright (C) 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc

> As for the strangely different behaviour when running pre-compiled
> (old has %load-path's old value) and compiling (old has %load-path's
> value after (add-to-load-path ...) yes, that happens to me too, on
>
>   tomas@rasputin:/tmp$ guile --version
>   guile (GNU Guile) 2.0.11.133-d680
>   Copyright (C) 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>
> Looks like a bug to me.

Thanks for your answer.

--=20
Mathieu Lirzin

Message sent to bug-guile@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#23739: Unexpected behavior of 'add-to-load-path'.
Resent-From: Alex Kost <alezost@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guile@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 08:04:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.23739.B23739.14682242392634 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23739
X-GNU-PR-Package: guile
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@HIDDEN>
Cc: tomas@HIDDEN, 23739 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 23739-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B23739.14682242392634
          (code B ref 23739); Mon, 11 Jul 2016 08:04:01 +0000
Received: (at 23739) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jul 2016 08:03:59 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45942 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1bMWC6-0000gQ-S6
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 04:03:59 -0400
Received: from mail-lf0-f51.google.com ([209.85.215.51]:34687)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <alezost@HIDDEN>) id 1bMWC5-0000gE-0e
 for 23739 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 04:03:57 -0400
Received: by mail-lf0-f51.google.com with SMTP id h129so64562764lfh.1
 for <23739 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 01:03:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id
 :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=IdGmdSq4q6B2jzFCUGmjGqGq3A84a0M5OnWUy5D0A+A=;
 b=ntfviqlGudnOrwU4KXQPfnz1na+tLXKP9FtZLPYNHZJPQV7rT6XRZZrNY6BGIxpG18
 QPpwJNDb82eyZYJqlR6zv6PxWRwybclsvsIchrV41IltGLFC2bfVWrLHrDfJ9EnPQ5re
 3LZ4YnYAqOVrH36jwXBscNSXHTKXBG1+TQGqIKOrjevCN0fYIRDDOdAIe+4BbHy+/Gw+
 lyKEGEASWzUtsvFaYqVtYeOLcCUGdjJLhPlHe89qV+mNwMHcDIu2ceXoFJhPchpcCQUn
 WSBAbdqiNxGUUUwq55o5otcd+4lDCDr/heHh4xOhPOMxrrmoA1lf0UOv+rcIzuikFgbq
 8wfw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to
 :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=IdGmdSq4q6B2jzFCUGmjGqGq3A84a0M5OnWUy5D0A+A=;
 b=d+hg9A4s+e0y2bhOJV8QDO4dD1aiwnMRDMUy8IrkwHXzyGcGc3CjhrdLMzTJib/ZO1
 BxCR1BjqvkaDggouZ2X1g19mVUf9T7uvKpsL/GjfqoiQyADcq/mOEO9UuLrg0BVZZn6p
 o9AxGrmEG9dtF99m8JrNkQejkYeZ3wwbqOaoRlmYe/rGypoT00jUCeYoeXJaJUInQgWR
 F18CJOuGEqJZQR0ql/V6s5OMnMwdDDfKmgUsH3GwNK/5B/xrqggUOeTTLRhL8sYchyvs
 DzvURwaXgqILrGpyjEBjlZi3Imswf7hBb9hmA/EwZHOikTgPbLvwEuBy4ByK71Al9RVD
 BgTQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJ+BU7SjMZJYErNBTLg1+b/u2kPxjAWcdH6ykLT7hRwN6DZcIQd3aL7dqq5fRyRDQ==
X-Received: by 10.25.19.96 with SMTP id j93mr3028136lfi.13.1468224231100;
 Mon, 11 Jul 2016 01:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leviafan ([217.107.192.156])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 63sm4107355ljb.48.2016.07.11.01.03.50
 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Mon, 11 Jul 2016 01:03:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Alex Kost <alezost@HIDDEN>
References: <878tydck6k.fsf@HIDDEN> <20160610134143.GA8848@HIDDEN>
 <874m91cbrt.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 11:03:49 +0300
In-Reply-To: <874m91cbrt.fsf@HIDDEN> (Mathieu Lirzin's message of "Fri, 10
 Jun 2016 17:19:02 +0200")
Message-ID: <871t30r47u.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)

Mathieu Lirzin (2016-06-10 18:19 +0300) wrote:

> <tomas@HIDDEN> writes:
[...]
>> I mean: the double entry "foo" for %load-path in your first result
>> above doesn't happen for me. Could that be a typo?
>
> My report was partially correct indeed.  There are two added entries in
> =E2=80=98%load-path=E2=80=99 with Guile from Debian testing:

This relates to <https://bugs.gnu.org/18127>.  The commit Ian mentioned was:
<http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guile.git/commit/?id=3D8857e271d810623868=
509f837d17613195f6528c>

--=20
Alex

Message sent to bug-guile@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#23739: Unexpected behavior of 'add-to-load-path'.
Resent-From: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guile@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 09:37:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.23739.B23739.146822977211654 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23739
X-GNU-PR-Package: guile
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Alex Kost <alezost@HIDDEN>
Cc: tomas@HIDDEN, 23739 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 23739-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B23739.146822977211654
          (code B ref 23739); Mon, 11 Jul 2016 09:37:02 +0000
Received: (at 23739) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jul 2016 09:36:12 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45976 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1bMXdM-00031u-1c
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 05:36:12 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34487)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <mthl@HIDDEN>) id 1bMXdJ-00031j-Qx
 for 23739 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 05:36:11 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <mthl@HIDDEN>) id 1bMXd9-0007iq-S0
 for 23739 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 05:36:04 -0400
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:43804)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mthl@HIDDEN>)
 id 1bMXcv-0007hq-0Z; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 05:35:45 -0400
Received: from arennes-653-1-368-199.w109-218.abo.wanadoo.fr
 ([109.218.199.199]:38526 helo=godel)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <mthl@HIDDEN>)
 id 1bMXct-0003oP-1v; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 05:35:43 -0400
From: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@HIDDEN>
References: <878tydck6k.fsf@HIDDEN> <20160610134143.GA8848@HIDDEN>
 <874m91cbrt.fsf@HIDDEN> <871t30r47u.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 11:35:40 +0200
In-Reply-To: <871t30r47u.fsf@HIDDEN> (Alex Kost's message of "Mon, 11 Jul
 2016 11:03:49 +0300")
Message-ID: <87oa64o6tv.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e
X-Spam-Score: -6.3 (------)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -6.3 (------)

Alex Kost <alezost@HIDDEN> writes:

> Mathieu Lirzin (2016-06-10 18:19 +0300) wrote:
>
>> <tomas@HIDDEN> writes:
> [...]
>>> I mean: the double entry "foo" for %load-path in your first result
>>> above doesn't happen for me. Could that be a typo?
>>
>> My report was partially correct indeed.  There are two added entries in
>> =E2=80=98%load-path=E2=80=99 with Guile from Debian testing:
>
> This relates to <https://bugs.gnu.org/18127>.  The commit Ian mentioned w=
as:
> <http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guile.git/commit/?id=3D8857e271d8106238=
68509f837d17613195f6528c>

OK, so the only remaining issue is the 'auto-compile' part.

Thanks for the information.

--=20
Mathieu Lirzin

Last modified: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 12:00:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.