Received: (at 23739) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jul 2016 09:36:12 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jul 11 05:36:12 2016 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45976 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1bMXdM-00031u-1c for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 05:36:12 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34487) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <mthl@HIDDEN>) id 1bMXdJ-00031j-Qx for 23739 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 05:36:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mthl@HIDDEN>) id 1bMXd9-0007iq-S0 for 23739 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 05:36:04 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:43804) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mthl@HIDDEN>) id 1bMXcv-0007hq-0Z; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 05:35:45 -0400 Received: from arennes-653-1-368-199.w109-218.abo.wanadoo.fr ([109.218.199.199]:38526 helo=godel) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <mthl@HIDDEN>) id 1bMXct-0003oP-1v; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 05:35:43 -0400 From: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@HIDDEN> To: Alex Kost <alezost@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#23739: Unexpected behavior of 'add-to-load-path'. References: <878tydck6k.fsf@HIDDEN> <20160610134143.GA8848@HIDDEN> <874m91cbrt.fsf@HIDDEN> <871t30r47u.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 11:35:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: <871t30r47u.fsf@HIDDEN> (Alex Kost's message of "Mon, 11 Jul 2016 11:03:49 +0300") Message-ID: <87oa64o6tv.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -6.3 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 23739 Cc: tomas@HIDDEN, 23739 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -6.3 (------) Alex Kost <alezost@HIDDEN> writes: > Mathieu Lirzin (2016-06-10 18:19 +0300) wrote: > >> <tomas@HIDDEN> writes: > [...] >>> I mean: the double entry "foo" for %load-path in your first result >>> above doesn't happen for me. Could that be a typo? >> >> My report was partially correct indeed. There are two added entries in >> =E2=80=98%load-path=E2=80=99 with Guile from Debian testing: > > This relates to <https://bugs.gnu.org/18127>. The commit Ian mentioned w= as: > <http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guile.git/commit/?id=3D8857e271d8106238= 68509f837d17613195f6528c> OK, so the only remaining issue is the 'auto-compile' part. Thanks for the information. --=20 Mathieu Lirzin
bug-guile@HIDDEN
:bug#23739
; Package guile
.
Full text available.Received: (at 23739) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jul 2016 08:03:59 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jul 11 04:03:59 2016 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45942 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1bMWC6-0000gQ-S6 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 04:03:59 -0400 Received: from mail-lf0-f51.google.com ([209.85.215.51]:34687) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <alezost@HIDDEN>) id 1bMWC5-0000gE-0e for 23739 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 04:03:57 -0400 Received: by mail-lf0-f51.google.com with SMTP id h129so64562764lfh.1 for <23739 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 01:03:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IdGmdSq4q6B2jzFCUGmjGqGq3A84a0M5OnWUy5D0A+A=; b=ntfviqlGudnOrwU4KXQPfnz1na+tLXKP9FtZLPYNHZJPQV7rT6XRZZrNY6BGIxpG18 QPpwJNDb82eyZYJqlR6zv6PxWRwybclsvsIchrV41IltGLFC2bfVWrLHrDfJ9EnPQ5re 3LZ4YnYAqOVrH36jwXBscNSXHTKXBG1+TQGqIKOrjevCN0fYIRDDOdAIe+4BbHy+/Gw+ lyKEGEASWzUtsvFaYqVtYeOLcCUGdjJLhPlHe89qV+mNwMHcDIu2ceXoFJhPchpcCQUn WSBAbdqiNxGUUUwq55o5otcd+4lDCDr/heHh4xOhPOMxrrmoA1lf0UOv+rcIzuikFgbq 8wfw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IdGmdSq4q6B2jzFCUGmjGqGq3A84a0M5OnWUy5D0A+A=; b=d+hg9A4s+e0y2bhOJV8QDO4dD1aiwnMRDMUy8IrkwHXzyGcGc3CjhrdLMzTJib/ZO1 BxCR1BjqvkaDggouZ2X1g19mVUf9T7uvKpsL/GjfqoiQyADcq/mOEO9UuLrg0BVZZn6p o9AxGrmEG9dtF99m8JrNkQejkYeZ3wwbqOaoRlmYe/rGypoT00jUCeYoeXJaJUInQgWR F18CJOuGEqJZQR0ql/V6s5OMnMwdDDfKmgUsH3GwNK/5B/xrqggUOeTTLRhL8sYchyvs DzvURwaXgqILrGpyjEBjlZi3Imswf7hBb9hmA/EwZHOikTgPbLvwEuBy4ByK71Al9RVD BgTQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJ+BU7SjMZJYErNBTLg1+b/u2kPxjAWcdH6ykLT7hRwN6DZcIQd3aL7dqq5fRyRDQ== X-Received: by 10.25.19.96 with SMTP id j93mr3028136lfi.13.1468224231100; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 01:03:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from leviafan ([217.107.192.156]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 63sm4107355ljb.48.2016.07.11.01.03.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Jul 2016 01:03:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Alex Kost <alezost@HIDDEN> To: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#23739: Unexpected behavior of 'add-to-load-path'. References: <878tydck6k.fsf@HIDDEN> <20160610134143.GA8848@HIDDEN> <874m91cbrt.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 11:03:49 +0300 In-Reply-To: <874m91cbrt.fsf@HIDDEN> (Mathieu Lirzin's message of "Fri, 10 Jun 2016 17:19:02 +0200") Message-ID: <871t30r47u.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 23739 Cc: tomas@HIDDEN, 23739 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Mathieu Lirzin (2016-06-10 18:19 +0300) wrote: > <tomas@HIDDEN> writes: [...] >> I mean: the double entry "foo" for %load-path in your first result >> above doesn't happen for me. Could that be a typo? > > My report was partially correct indeed. There are two added entries in > =E2=80=98%load-path=E2=80=99 with Guile from Debian testing: This relates to <https://bugs.gnu.org/18127>. The commit Ian mentioned was: <http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guile.git/commit/?id=3D8857e271d810623868= 509f837d17613195f6528c> --=20 Alex
bug-guile@HIDDEN
:bug#23739
; Package guile
.
Full text available.Received: (at 23739) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jun 2016 15:19:34 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jun 10 11:19:34 2016 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36154 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1bBODe-00038A-FU for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 11:19:34 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49116) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <mthl@HIDDEN>) id 1bBODc-00037c-IZ for 23739 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 11:19:32 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mthl@HIDDEN>) id 1bBODD-0004K9-1i for 23739 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 11:19:27 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:60019) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mthl@HIDDEN>) id 1bBODC-0004Ik-V9; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 11:19:06 -0400 Received: from mek33-4-82-236-46-88.fbx.proxad.net ([82.236.46.88]:38988 helo=godel) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <mthl@HIDDEN>) id 1bBODB-000138-7t; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 11:19:05 -0400 From: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@HIDDEN> To: <tomas@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#23739: Unexpected behavior of 'add-to-load-path'. References: <878tydck6k.fsf@HIDDEN> <20160610134143.GA8848@HIDDEN> Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 17:19:02 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20160610134143.GA8848@HIDDEN> (tomas@HIDDEN's message of "Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:41:43 +0200") Message-ID: <874m91cbrt.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 23739 Cc: 23739 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) <tomas@HIDDEN> writes: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 02:17:23PM +0200, Mathieu Lirzin wrote: >> Hello, >>=20 >> I have noticed something that doesn't feel right when using >> =E2=80=98add-to-load-path=E2=80=99. >>=20 >> $ cat test.scm >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >> (define old %load-path) >> (add-to-load-path "foo") >> (pk %load-path) >> (pk old) >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >>=20 >> first run: >>=20 >> $ guile test.scm >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >> ;;; [Compilation] >> ;;; (("foo" "foo" "/usr/share/guile/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/site/2.0" "/u= sr/share/guile/site" "/usr/share/guile")) >>=20 >> ;;; (("foo" "/usr/share/guile/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/site/2.0" "/usr/sha= re/guile/site" "/usr/share/guile")) >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >>=20 >> next runs: >>=20 >> $ guile test.scm >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >> ;;; (("foo" "/usr/share/guile/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/site/2.0" "/usr/sha= re/guile/site" "/usr/share/guile")) >>=20 >> ;;; (("/usr/share/guile/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/site/2.0" "/usr/share/gui= le/site" "/usr/share/guile")) >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > I can confirm half of it :-) > > I mean: the double entry "foo" for %load-path in your first result > above doesn't happen for me. Could that be a typo? My report was partially correct indeed. There are two added entries in =E2=80=98%load-path=E2=80=99 with Guile from Debian testing: $ guile --version guile (GNU Guile) 2.0.11 Packaged by Debian (2.0.11-deb+1-10+b1) Copyright (C) 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc. but only one with guile master: $ meta/guile --version guile (GNU Guile) 2.1.2.191-6788f Copyright (C) 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc > As for the strangely different behaviour when running pre-compiled > (old has %load-path's old value) and compiling (old has %load-path's > value after (add-to-load-path ...) yes, that happens to me too, on > > tomas@rasputin:/tmp$ guile --version > guile (GNU Guile) 2.0.11.133-d680 > Copyright (C) 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > > Looks like a bug to me. Thanks for your answer. --=20 Mathieu Lirzin
bug-guile@HIDDEN
:bug#23739
; Package guile
.
Full text available.Received: (at 23739) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jun 2016 13:41:50 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jun 10 09:41:50 2016 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35241 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1bBMh4-0000Wk-0f for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 09:41:50 -0400 Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]:46539 helo=tomasium.tuxteam.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <tomas@HIDDEN>) id 1bBMh2-0000Wb-Rv for 23739 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 09:41:49 -0400 Received: from tomas by tomasium.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <tomas@HIDDEN>) id 1bBMgx-0002OM-T9; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:41:43 +0200 Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:41:43 +0200 To: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#23739: Unexpected behavior of 'add-to-load-path'. Message-ID: <20160610134143.GA8848@HIDDEN> References: <878tydck6k.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; x-action=pgp-signed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <878tydck6k.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) From: <tomas@HIDDEN> X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 23739 Cc: 23739 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 02:17:23PM +0200, Mathieu Lirzin wrote: > Hello, > > I have noticed something that doesn't feel right when using > ‘add-to-load-path’. > > $ cat test.scm > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > (define old %load-path) > (add-to-load-path "foo") > (pk %load-path) > (pk old) > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > first run: > > $ guile test.scm > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > ;;; [Compilation] > ;;; (("foo" "foo" "/usr/share/guile/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/site/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/site" "/usr/share/guile")) > > ;;; (("foo" "/usr/share/guile/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/site/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/site" "/usr/share/guile")) > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > next runs: > > $ guile test.scm > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > ;;; (("foo" "/usr/share/guile/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/site/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/site" "/usr/share/guile")) > > ;;; (("/usr/share/guile/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/site/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/site" "/usr/share/guile")) > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- I can confirm half of it :-) I mean: the double entry "foo" for %load-path in your first result above doesn't happen for me. Could that be a typo? As for the strangely different behaviour when running pre-compiled (old has %load-path's old value) and compiling (old has %load-path's value after (add-to-load-path ...) yes, that happens to me too, on tomas@rasputin:/tmp$ guile --version guile (GNU Guile) 2.0.11.133-d680 Copyright (C) 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc. Looks like a bug to me. regards - -- tomás -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAldaw5cACgkQBcgs9XrR2kZmoACfd8HliwAbrWdo3xK1jm44aIkQ yPYAnj9MoF0OanAUD46iOnAoLLA1qrVu =zuV2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
bug-guile@HIDDEN
:bug#23739
; Package guile
.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jun 2016 12:17:46 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jun 10 08:17:46 2016 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35206 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1bBLNi-0006v5-1x for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 08:17:46 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47886) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <mthl@HIDDEN>) id 1bBLNh-0006uu-9R for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 08:17:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mthl@HIDDEN>) id 1bBLNb-0005a9-Aq for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 08:17:40 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:34234) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mthl@HIDDEN>) id 1bBLNb-0005Zt-7O for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 08:17:39 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38832) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mthl@HIDDEN>) id 1bBLNZ-0008GV-5q for bug-guile@HIDDEN; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 08:17:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mthl@HIDDEN>) id 1bBLNU-0005Yi-UG for bug-guile@HIDDEN; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 08:17:36 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:57043) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mthl@HIDDEN>) id 1bBLNU-0005Yc-Qq for bug-guile@HIDDEN; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 08:17:32 -0400 Received: from mek33-4-82-236-46-88.fbx.proxad.net ([82.236.46.88]:37406 helo=godel) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <mthl@HIDDEN>) id 1bBLNT-0004NV-1v for bug-guile@HIDDEN; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 08:17:31 -0400 From: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@HIDDEN> To: bug-guile <bug-guile@HIDDEN> Subject: Unexpected behavior of 'add-to-load-path'. User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 14:17:23 +0200 Message-ID: <878tydck6k.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) Hello, I have noticed something that doesn't feel right when using =E2=80=98add-to-load-path=E2=80=99. $ cat test.scm --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (define old %load-path) (add-to-load-path "foo") (pk %load-path) (pk old) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- first run: $ guile test.scm --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- ;;; [Compilation] ;;; (("foo" "foo" "/usr/share/guile/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/site/2.0" "/usr/= share/guile/site" "/usr/share/guile")) ;;; (("foo" "/usr/share/guile/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/site/2.0" "/usr/share/= guile/site" "/usr/share/guile")) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- next runs: $ guile test.scm --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- ;;; (("foo" "/usr/share/guile/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/site/2.0" "/usr/share/= guile/site" "/usr/share/guile")) ;;; (("/usr/share/guile/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/site/2.0" "/usr/share/guile/= site" "/usr/share/guile")) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- each time test.scm is recompiled the first result reappears. This has been tested with Guile 2.0.11 and Guile master. Thanks, --=20 Mathieu Lirzin
Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@HIDDEN>
:bug-guile@HIDDEN
.
Full text available.bug-guile@HIDDEN
:bug#23739
; Package guile
.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.