GNU bug report logs - #41264
Bootstrap packages fail to build due to mes-libc lacking 'stat64' etc. syscalls

Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.
Package: guix; Severity: important; Reported by: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@HIDDEN>; merged with #49985; dated Thu, 14 May 2020 15:18:02 UTC; Maintainer for guix is bug-guix@HIDDEN.
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@HIDDEN> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. Full text available.
Changed bug title to 'Bootstrap packages fail to build due to mes-libc lacking 'stat64' etc. syscalls' from 'Bootstrap packages fail to build.' Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@HIDDEN> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. Full text available.
Merged 41264 49985. Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@HIDDEN> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. Full text available.

Message received at 41264 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 41264) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 May 2020 16:53:09 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 19 12:53:09 2020
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50826 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1jb5UL-0008BJ-BG
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 May 2020 12:53:09 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52612)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <janneke@HIDDEN>) id 1jb5UJ-0008B7-Q2
 for 41264 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 May 2020 12:53:08 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:55928)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <janneke@HIDDEN>)
 id 1jb5UD-0007Rh-51; Tue, 19 May 2020 12:53:01 -0400
Received: from [2001:980:1b4f:1:42d2:832d:bb59:862] (port=46670
 helo=dundal.peder.onsbrabantnet.nl)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <janneke@HIDDEN>)
 id 1jb5UC-000479-DM; Tue, 19 May 2020 12:53:00 -0400
From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN>
To: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#41264: Bootstrap packages fail to build.
Organization: AvatarAcademy.nl
References: <87h7wik0kk.fsf@HIDDEN> <87v9kxe6tl.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87ftbwtigj.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Url: http://AvatarAcademy.nl
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 18:52:56 +0200
In-Reply-To: <87ftbwtigj.fsf@HIDDEN> (Mathieu Othacehe's message of "Tue, 19
 May 2020 10:52:28 +0200")
Message-ID: <87sgfvq32v.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 41264
Cc: 41264 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Mathieu Othacehe writes:

Hello Mathieu,

>> So stat, lstat, and all other related function will return -EOVERFLOW
>> unless their 64 bits stat64, lstat64 counterpart is used.
>>
>> So I think this means that one cannot build the Guix bootstrap toolchain=
 on an
>> NVME disk.
>
> After further investigations I think that it is needed to patch GNU Mes
> to fix this bug.

Hmm, we need to patch Mes after all.  That's unfortunate.

> We would need to add three new syscalls for x86:
>
> #define SYS_stat64    0xc3
> #define SYS_lstat64   0xc4
> #define SYS_fstat64   0xc5
>
>
> lib/linux/stat.c should be modified this way:
>
> #if __i386__
> #define STAT_SYSCALL SYS_stat64
> #else
> #define STAT_SYSCALL SYS_stat
> #endif

Ah...the stat64 syscall is meant for i386; now it at starts making at
least some sense to me.

> int
> stat (char const *file_name, struct stat *statbuf)
> {
>   struct stat64 statbuf64;
>   int ret;
>
>   ret =3D _sys_call2 (STAT_SYSCALL, (long) file_name, (long) &statbuf64);
>
> #if __i386__
>   stat64_to_32(&statbuf64, statbuf);
> #else
>   *statbuf =3D statbuf64;
> #endif
>
>   return ret;
> }

That looks OK...

> Then we would need to create stat64_to_32 which could be inspired from
> __xstat64_conv from the glibc. Then, lstat and fstat64 would need to be
> patched the same way.
>
> This way, we would replicate the glibc behavior.

Beautiful, thanks for getting to the bottom of this.  Now that you
already have gone this far, would you like to whip-up a full patch for
GNU Mes?

To test it we may have to provide a tarball as we don't want to use XZ
and we don't have patch yet.  Or possibly we can download some
individual files ande overwrite them.

Greetings,
Janneke

--=20
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@HIDDEN> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar=C2=AE http://AvatarAcademy.com
Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#41264; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 41264 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 41264) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 May 2020 08:52:38 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 19 04:52:38 2020
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49154 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1jaxzK-00065L-0R
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 May 2020 04:52:38 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46702)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <othacehe@HIDDEN>) id 1jaxzJ-000656-4c
 for 41264 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 May 2020 04:52:37 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46942)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <othacehe@HIDDEN>) id 1jaxzD-0004Ru-OY
 for 41264 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 May 2020 04:52:31 -0400
Received: from [2a01:e0a:fa:a50:7004:8043:e0bd:6eda] (port=35840 helo=meru)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <othacehe@HIDDEN>) id 1jaxzD-0005I9-Cv
 for 41264 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 May 2020 04:52:31 -0400
From: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@HIDDEN>
To: 41264 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#41264: Bootstrap packages fail to build.
References: <87h7wik0kk.fsf@HIDDEN> <87v9kxe6tl.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 10:52:28 +0200
In-Reply-To: <87v9kxe6tl.fsf@HIDDEN> (Mathieu Othacehe's message of "Fri, 15
 May 2020 14:11:34 +0200")
Message-ID: <87ftbwtigj.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 41264
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)


Hello,

> So stat, lstat, and all other related function will return -EOVERFLOW
> unless their 64 bits stat64, lstat64 counterpart is used.
>
> So I think this means that one cannot build the Guix bootstrap toolchain on an
> NVME disk.

After further investigations I think that it is needed to patch GNU Mes
to fix this bug.

We would need to add three new syscalls for x86:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
#define SYS_stat64    0xc3
#define SYS_lstat64   0xc4
#define SYS_fstat64   0xc5
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

lib/linux/stat.c should be modified this way:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
#if __i386__
#define STAT_SYSCALL SYS_stat64
#else
#define STAT_SYSCALL SYS_stat
#endif

int
stat (char const *file_name, struct stat *statbuf)
{
  struct stat64 statbuf64;
  int ret;

  ret = _sys_call2 (STAT_SYSCALL, (long) file_name, (long) &statbuf64);

#if __i386__
  stat64_to_32(&statbuf64, statbuf);
#else
  *statbuf = statbuf64;
#endif

  return ret;
}
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Then we would need to create stat64_to_32 which could be inspired from
__xstat64_conv from the glibc. Then, lstat and fstat64 would need to be
patched the same way.

This way, we would replicate the glibc behavior.

Thanks,

Mathieu
Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#41264; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 41264 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 41264) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 May 2020 12:11:48 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 15 08:11:48 2020
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36140 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1jZZBs-0002Il-38
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 May 2020 08:11:48 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59168)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <othacehe@HIDDEN>) id 1jZZBq-0002IZ-Kc
 for 41264 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 May 2020 08:11:46 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:39104)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <othacehe@HIDDEN>) id 1jZZBk-00079Z-Ta
 for 41264 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 May 2020 08:11:40 -0400
Received: from [2a01:cb18:832e:5f00:5cdd:cc67:a2e1:e2f0] (port=35580 helo=meru)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <othacehe@HIDDEN>) id 1jZZBg-0004Ww-6x
 for 41264 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 May 2020 08:11:40 -0400
From: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@HIDDEN>
To: 41264 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#41264: Bootstrap packages fail to build.
References: <87h7wik0kk.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 14:11:34 +0200
In-Reply-To: <87h7wik0kk.fsf@HIDDEN> (Mathieu Othacehe's message of "Thu, 14
 May 2020 17:17:47 +0200")
Message-ID: <87v9kxe6tl.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 41264
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)


Hello,

> fstat(3, 0xffad5874)                    = -1 EOVERFLOW (Value too large for defined data type)
> fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0555, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
> fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0555, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
>
> So I think somehow, bootstrap packages use the legacy "fstat" syscall,
> which may overflow on a 64 bits system.

More info on that one. Linux syscall "newstat", will call
"cp_compat_stat". This function starts by checking the device id:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
	struct compat_stat tmp;

	if (!old_valid_dev(stat->dev) || !old_valid_dev(stat->rdev))
		return -EOVERFLOW;
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Here, stat->dev is 66308 (major: 259, minor 4).

"old_valid_dev" checks that:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
static inline bool old_valid_dev(dev_t dev)
{
	return MAJOR(dev) < 256 && MINOR(dev) < 256;
}--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Which is false here, because my NVME disk has a BLOCK_EXT_MAJOR (259).

So stat, lstat, and all other related function will return -EOVERFLOW
unless their 64 bits stat64, lstat64 counterpart is used.

So I think this means that one cannot build the Guix bootstrap toolchain on an
NVME disk.

Thanks,

Mathieu
Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#41264; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 May 2020 15:17:52 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 14 11:17:52 2020
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34467 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1jZFcN-0004nA-U2
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 May 2020 11:17:52 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:35718)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <othacehe@HIDDEN>) id 1jZFcM-0004n3-F5
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 May 2020 11:17:50 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47864)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <othacehe@HIDDEN>) id 1jZFcM-0005dk-9J
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Thu, 14 May 2020 11:17:50 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35166)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <othacehe@HIDDEN>)
 id 1jZFcL-0002m5-Ul; Thu, 14 May 2020 11:17:49 -0400
Received: from [2a01:cb18:832e:5f00:5cdd:cc67:a2e1:e2f0] (port=53470 helo=meru)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <othacehe@HIDDEN>)
 id 1jZFcL-0003Vu-Dr; Thu, 14 May 2020 11:17:49 -0400
From: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@HIDDEN>
To: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Subject: Bootstrap packages fail to build.
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 17:17:47 +0200
Message-ID: <87h7wik0kk.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.91 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-="
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
Cc: janneke@HIDDEN
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain


Hello,

This command fails on one of my systems:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
guix build  -e "(@@ (gnu packages commencement) glibc-mesboot0)"
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

with the following error:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
phase `unpack' succeeded after 11.8 seconds
starting phase `apply-boot-patch'
patch: **** fstatsterror: unknown error:  
command "patch" "--force" "-p1" "-i" "/gnu/store/pfz4y5i7krlvam2m8lpddmg9vi44rpqh-glibc-boot-2.2.5.patch" failed with status 2
note: keeping build directory `/tmp/guix-build-glibc-mesboot0-2.2.5.drv-1'
builder for `/gnu/store/jcqggqckhiq43y2ivlfhpkbfbp2vyjlc-glibc-mesboot0-2.2.5.drv' failed with exit code 1
build of /gnu/store/jcqggqckhiq43y2ivlfhpkbfbp2vyjlc-glibc-mesboot0-2.2.5.drv failed
View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/jc/qggqckhiq43y2ivlfhpkbfbp2vyjlc-glibc-mesboot0-2.2.5.drv.bz2'.
guix build: error: build of `/gnu/store/jcqggqckhiq43y2ivlfhpkbfbp2vyjlc-glibc-mesboot0-2.2.5.drv' failed
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Here's a stracing of the failing "patch" command:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
open("/gnu/store/pfz4y5i7krlvam2m8lpddmg9vi44rpqh-glibc-boot-2.2.5.patch", O_RDONLY) = 3
brk(0x9377913)                          = 0x9377913
fstat(3, 0xffb29328)                    = -1 EOVERFLOW (Value too large for defined data type)
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

"patch-mesboot" is built for 32 bits. Hence, it can be using
"__ia32_sys_fstat", "__ia32_compat_sys_newfstat" or
"__ia32_compat_sys_x86_fstat64" syscall for "fstat". Here, according to
perf, it's using __ia32_compat_sys_newfstat which is overflowing on my
file system (inode count to high or so).

There's a little demonstration program attached. When built with `gcc
-m32 test.c', I have:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
fstat(3, 0xffad5874)                    = -1 EOVERFLOW (Value too large for defined data type)
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0555, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0555, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

So I think somehow, bootstrap packages use the legacy "fstat" syscall,
which may overflow on a 64 bits system.

WDYT,

Thanks,

Mathieu

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/x-csrc
Content-Disposition: inline; filename=t.c

#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>

#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <sys/sysmacros.h>

int
main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
    struct stat sb;

    if (argc != 2) {
        fprintf(stderr, "Usage: %s <pathname>\n", argv[0]);
        exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
    }

    int fd = open(argv[1], O_RDONLY);
    syscall(__NR_fstat, fd, &sb);
    syscall(__NR_fstat64, fd, &sb);
    fstat(fd, &sb);


    exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
}

--=-=-=--
Acknowledgement sent to Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@HIDDEN>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN. Full text available.
Report forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#41264; Package guix. Full text available.
Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.
Last modified: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 14:15:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.