GNU logs - #42612, boring messages

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#42612: 28.0.50; Eshell: support setting working buffer like IELM
Resent-From: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 05:31:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.42612.B.159608700421360 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 42612 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 22:29:52 -0700
Message-ID: <87o8nx1sfj.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.147.123.19;
 envelope-from=spwhitton@HIDDEN; helo=wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com
X-Spam_score_int: -27
X-Spam_score: -2.8
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01,
 SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
 URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)

Hello,

Eshell's docs advertise it as a replacement for IELM, but one IELM
feature that Eshell doesn't have is an equivalent to C-c C-b, or,
ielm-change-working-buffer.  It would be great to have something like
this.

-- 
Sean Whitton

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#42612: Acknowledgement (28.0.50; Eshell: support setting
 working buffer like IELM)
Message-ID: <handler.42612.B.159608700421360.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <87o8nx1sfj.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 42612
X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs
Reply-To: 42612 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 05:31:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 42612 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
42612: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D42612
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#42612: 28.0.50; Eshell: support setting working buffer like IELM
Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 13:16:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.42612.B42612.15961149339936 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@HIDDEN>
Cc: 42612 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 16:15:05 +0300
Message-Id: <834kppf8km.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87o8nx1sfj.fsf@HIDDEN> (message from Sean Whitton
 on Wed, 29 Jul 2020 22:29:52 -0700)
References: <87o8nx1sfj.fsf@HIDDEN>
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

> From: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@HIDDEN>
> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 22:29:52 -0700
> 
> Eshell's docs advertise it as a replacement for IELM, but one IELM
> feature that Eshell doesn't have is an equivalent to C-c C-b, or,
> ielm-change-working-buffer.  It would be great to have something like
> this.

Like "C-u M-x eshell RET"?

If that's not what you wanted, then perhaps I don't quite understand
what you meant by running Eshell in another buffer.

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#42612: 28.0.50; Eshell: support setting working buffer like IELM
Resent-From: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 16:50:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.42612.B42612.159612776615108 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Cc: 42612 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <834kppf8km.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <87o8nx1sfj.fsf@HIDDEN> <834kppf8km.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:49:15 -0700
Message-ID: <87lfj10wz8.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

Hello Eli,

On Thu 30 Jul 2020 at 04:15PM +03, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

>> From: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@HIDDEN>
>> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 22:29:52 -0700
>>
>> Eshell's docs advertise it as a replacement for IELM, but one IELM
>> feature that Eshell doesn't have is an equivalent to C-c C-b, or,
>> ielm-change-working-buffer.  It would be great to have something like
>> this.
>
> Like "C-u M-x eshell RET"?
>
> If that's not what you wanted, then perhaps I don't quite understand
> what you meant by running Eshell in another buffer.

No, not what I had in mind.

In IELM you can type C-c C-b and select a buffer, and then when you eval
further sexps in *ielm*, it will be as if you used M-: with that other
buffer selected.  Useful for debugging a major or minor mode.

In Eshell the closest thing you can do is wrap your sexps in a
(with-current-buffer) form, or use (progn (set-buffer ...) ...), which
is less convenient.

-- 
Sean Whitton

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#42612: 28.0.50; Eshell: support setting working buffer like IELM
Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 17:08:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.42612.B42612.159612882216666 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42612
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@HIDDEN>
Cc: 42612 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 42612-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B42612.159612882216666
          (code B ref 42612); Thu, 30 Jul 2020 17:08:02 +0000
Received: (at 42612) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jul 2020 17:07:02 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36651 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1k1C1F-0004Ke-I9
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 13:07:01 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37614)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1k1C1D-0004KM-Bc
 for 42612 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 13:07:00 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41745)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>)
 id 1k1C17-0000Nj-8C; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 13:06:53 -0400
Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4496 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>)
 id 1k1C16-00060k-Ha; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 13:06:53 -0400
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 20:06:36 +0300
Message-Id: <83v9i5djab.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87lfj10wz8.fsf@HIDDEN> (message from Sean Whitton
 on Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:49:15 -0700)
References: <87o8nx1sfj.fsf@HIDDEN> <834kppf8km.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87lfj10wz8.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

> From: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@HIDDEN>
> Cc: 42612 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:49:15 -0700
> 
> In IELM you can type C-c C-b and select a buffer, and then when you eval
> further sexps in *ielm*, it will be as if you used M-: with that other
> buffer selected.  Useful for debugging a major or minor mode.
> 
> In Eshell the closest thing you can do is wrap your sexps in a
> (with-current-buffer) form, or use (progn (set-buffer ...) ...), which
> is less convenient.

Eshell is a shell.  What is the semantics of running a shell in a
buffer?  The only semantics I can think of is to run the shell in the
default-directory of that buffer.

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#42612: 28.0.50; Eshell: support setting working buffer like IELM
Resent-From: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2020 22:11:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.42612.B42612.159640622919283 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42612
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Cc: 42612 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 42612-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B42612.159640622919283
          (code B ref 42612); Sun, 02 Aug 2020 22:11:02 +0000
Received: (at 42612) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Aug 2020 22:10:29 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43655 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1k2MBZ-00050x-Ku
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Aug 2020 18:10:29 -0400
Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.25]:50971)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <spwhitton@HIDDEN>) id 1k2MBX-00050k-OG
 for 42612 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Aug 2020 18:10:28 -0400
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41])
 by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 176EDC8F;
 Sun,  2 Aug 2020 18:10:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163])
 by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 02 Aug 2020 18:10:22 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=spwhitton.name;
 h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
 :mime-version:content-type; s=fm3; bh=+JOHtHLqqmeW8tSVRdD8weJ/Pf
 zFsK9RxXGElQnblak=; b=q0EQrCL80RZgjVzRlKjgNPxcVvfOwngTanFsLxEr2O
 nBptj6b3vDRyEqtgMCogoadFvEf18awK6QKF8L1bej+GM4q9vS1f76KOvb9iGZCG
 wWJFV5ytpINNCOgX6766VUTkpC4bPMJJx1Nfis2wXI+MpHs0ATS+AlKOmK9wv4oG
 yBW67x7RAd2biViBY2ioPLgG+plVLrabD397gAFB64a6EhI8BpiLYVy9XGRdNZ5s
 6D4eP3sbcRft37ktCwXCPYyYB8Ijw/2V0OC2lSOa/F+GbQpbRlFKIpMe4x2Yc5uO
 JUdks92Ho+6IKPaBBldfy6+5csMSt6kBxrz6DATvq2Dw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to
 :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy
 :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=+JOHtH
 LqqmeW8tSVRdD8weJ/PfzFsK9RxXGElQnblak=; b=JxUQPig0YBJQZFzZT0vHRD
 fsbLsLIhSuftj+Cauv3V2PUppd49nU3hudn895tfQfx5noRrTCHJOWC4Vd0yU4fV
 /AL1iSOAaOX3bEozGnv6TPfjWQa25DF03QXjDYtXbnYbvkuodymKB1OUdEOlk+Ch
 f+tSDUtMJBrXBYL5TTXHnMcX58j9KvOhIVLIk6f+K4ondT23yjl1idYwJORzjNyI
 xST5G05cJ2mslaOGBY0sUPs2kc7fPakikInV4U0tQzwDdzQ99ryscf1XcU4xKvpB
 GNW+Nz3VdrBjIL8lA/X1p3B8eMZBCiaq8NnFwr2Wubp0HFJD9aHN0sbNUHgRsd7Q
 ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:zTknX5LlQG57F_RMVJ5cKU28ImX5LMiLNQFQm5qbuCdZ6USu3rdAOQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrjeefgddtfecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf
 curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu
 uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc
 fjughrpefhvffujghffffkgggtsehttdertddttddtnecuhfhrohhmpefuvggrnhcuhghh
 ihhtthhonhcuoehsphifhhhithhtohhnsehsphifhhhithhtohhnrdhnrghmvgeqnecugg
 ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepgedtvdehgeffhfffvdeffefhgfejffelhfetveffffektefgtdej
 tdeivddtveehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrh
 homhepshhpfihhihhtthhonhesshhpfihhihhtthhonhdrnhgrmhgv
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:zTknX1IHccb5HUWOB80LQob5nZl419vj-akjMiJjLsVeOTiy2y0D5g>
 <xmx:zTknXxsirN0TMXki6XlQZYAsJd4hu27imHj_iN-KOY4yj05ND1Xk4Q>
 <xmx:zTknX6Yztijhhy80wdyia_KqE49DIObQExH5rxGDsimZSZFwHdZK6A>
 <xmx:zTknX5mwXe3La9-kSGIUvU1tai6MY1-Lt59a0Z9884cAfSOn6e5fpw>
From: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <83v9i5djab.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <87o8nx1sfj.fsf@HIDDEN> <834kppf8km.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87lfj10wz8.fsf@HIDDEN> <83v9i5djab.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2020 15:10:20 -0700
Message-ID: <87k0ygya0j.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)

Hello Eli,

On Thu 30 Jul 2020 at 08:06PM +03, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> Eshell is a shell.  What is the semantics of running a shell in a
> buffer?  The only semantics I can think of is to run the shell in the
> default-directory of that buffer.

(info "(eshell) Top") says

    [Eshell] is intended to be an alternative to the IELM REPL for Emacs
    and with an interface similar to command shells ...

The functionality of setting a working buffer would be for when Eshell
is being used as an alternative to IELM, and it would have the same
semantics as the equivalent functionality in IELM.

I agree that when Eshell is being used as a command shell the only
significant thing would be default-directory.

-- 
Sean Whitton

Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Sep 2020 02:37:45 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 11 22:37:45 2020
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45865 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1kGvQ9-0000Oj-DE
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 22:37:45 -0400
Received: from mail-ed1-f53.google.com ([209.85.208.53]:41149)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <stefankangas@HIDDEN>) id 1kGvQ7-0000OW-7F
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 22:37:43 -0400
Received: by mail-ed1-f53.google.com with SMTP id ay8so12103556edb.8
 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 19:37:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=vOWRfkki57iZb7NKzzA9Ih7MjfruAEkefJD5xXqjc9k=;
 b=HG/BDiuPD0Yz2dNvNiwkRJsE221pCy8UyXe0OHLeg23cj+6r46pZtersubg20TSedd
 Wv01Yn8Rr20L5I70Obx/kC5l27aeFLqY/i/QFIjvpzxlMYMQRS55wMIqQz0vUIKwyiW1
 3alQ1xPehgRDn4kI5wfvmgCnUyqkIcd9xpWUVrOYCYB+Q9sOZlClC8WjMa4jfI83RIft
 Ue7gy/v71lXcPXIV7StoseRem630WpiKqElOkFURgHw6pHzykmBAafBdCNMezVxRB3up
 2teQve/lfY6g53C4qMMt1D/BjhrW0DFjA+N+2tNrQgHB/mN79k3KRXPgNyQYt1kUKOab
 wBgg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5312mHI1J7AhEdxBcvwqnEGZk14khW0RGP8Cmb5Be1nvoPPIr2JY
 al/jQrEbkQ7eGERNW1ufe+wRKkhHvTwoEt90iE13a00w
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwdjRwqKodk0mmFCXHj0lyEUKg9AKGDBjW4MhNdJiMDoHVTuuYjonbygSMCC+BzgV1+wrSjVtngaHgUNRV/UXA=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:8524:: with SMTP id 33mr6107974edr.123.1599878257181; 
 Fri, 11 Sep 2020 19:37:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with
 HTTPREST; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 19:37:36 -0700
From: Stefan Kangas <stefan@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 19:37:36 -0700
Message-ID: <CADwFkm=pNbxdB6s_rvTNCUuRgY9AoOhF_VvGrWNc2BCQVtJE6w@HIDDEN>
Subject: 
To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview:  severity 42612 wishlist thanks 
 Content analysis details:   (2.5 points, 10.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
 provider (stefankangas[at]gmail.com)
 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level
 mail domains are different
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2      RBL: Average reputation (+2)
 [209.85.208.53 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 no trust [209.85.208.53 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY      Informational: message has unparseable relay
 lines 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT          Subject is present but empty
 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and
 EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  severity 42612 wishlist thanks 
 
 Content analysis details:   (1.5 points, 10.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
                              no trust
                             [209.85.208.53 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2      RBL: Average reputation (+2)
                             [209.85.208.53 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
                             provider (stefankangas[at]gmail.com)
  0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level
                             mail domains are different
  0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY      Informational: message has unparseable relay
                             lines
  2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT          Subject is present but empty
  0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and
                             EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are
                             different
 -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
                             manager

severity 42612 wishlist
thanks

Last modified: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 02:45:01 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.