Received: (at 49674) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jul 2021 14:58:07 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jul 21 10:58:07 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38264 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1m6Dfj-0005Zi-HK for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 10:58:07 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:43690) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1m6Dfh-0005ZB-8Z for 49674 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 10:58:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=XIPwGfodkisEVyzaVJFEzFdcc8M9MINFUQFzOXB2Yw0=; b=KwzRVU1USvSQqwVZYokH8ovZNO r59WIuy823ZkewGmQST6UwQDe50hvm+4oV+bvzxV55G1JE4OUGzlDv1Epo0+Uz7b4O7WvU2TC3D/k pXAZjjj4YrpGLsI6/GKXQzfepxhSQ+OIu54Icocpqnnjh+meP8OXQyrwEFLQrepdebnQ=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1m6DfZ-0007c2-0I; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 16:57:59 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> To: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#49674: 28.0.50; Should unload-feature remove advices? References: <871r7s75na.fsf@HIDDEN> X-Now-Playing: Bob Hund's _KlassiskBOBHUNkonsert_: "Harduingetmankandansatill?" Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 16:57:56 +0200 In-Reply-To: <871r7s75na.fsf@HIDDEN> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Wed, 21 Jul 2021 04:38:33 +0200") Message-ID: <87o8avpvd7.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@HIDDEN> writes: > While talking about the text about FEATURE-unload-hook in > (info "(elisp) Coding Conventions") (Bug#21440) the question was raised > whether `unload-feature' should try to automatically remove advi [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49674 Cc: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>, 49674 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@HIDDEN> writes: > While talking about the text about FEATURE-unload-hook in > (info "(elisp) Coding Conventions") (Bug#21440) the question was raised > whether `unload-feature' should try to automatically remove advices > (nadvice style) that belong to functions defined by the unloaded > feature. Currently these are ignored. I guess it would be a good > thing. AFAICT old-style advices were (and are) handled. I think that sounds like a good idea, but perhaps Stefan has a comment here (added to the CCs). -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#49674; Package emacs.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jul 2021 02:38:44 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jul 20 22:38:44 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35852 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1m628C-0004fD-7K for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 22:38:44 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:36566) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <michael_heerdegen@HIDDEN>) id 1m628A-0004f5-5v for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 22:38:42 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46428) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <michael_heerdegen@HIDDEN>) id 1m6289-0005rD-UA for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 22:38:41 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.3]:34733) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <michael_heerdegen@HIDDEN>) id 1m6285-0004H6-AB for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 22:38:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=dbaedf251592; t=1626835114; bh=CRhYSaRxTUHBMhbIVMWAQ5N6OaNb/3p38u5rRKyFd9w=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Subject:Date; b=R8B53R2mcAHhv+FNxwJFwnocfSZuTH8VRcr0tBu/h45Ve3IBXeb0Psgho8p68hMw8 PVa2kCllGG9sFHqCGNXhNaTf56T3/S9OUAjFglL0mGo06e2K3yJuTAFBXkaa1ziOYd SD1K9sKTLtXYAC49nQadx5GJW+HhNCp679jL0njo= X-UI-Sender-Class: c548c8c5-30a9-4db5-a2e7-cb6cb037b8f9 Received: from drachen.dragon ([88.66.201.45]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb001 [213.165.67.108]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MWAtV-1ldGzr03Uf-00XIEp; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 04:38:34 +0200 From: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@HIDDEN> To: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN Subject: 28.0.50; Should unload-feature remove advices? Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 04:38:33 +0200 Message-ID: <871r7s75na.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:+dIeeUy+gx65NB4Mnyf4qaK+Zh2gCcGFJem/wACXraDxuUEc6Yg nn1/j3uF7xkW0kFegfUnA3PoXZa3uBvgVCh075ucHLuepWJ4p0ScdwidMrEpFq6l8l0vdLU 0GB+J1Rkqd6SgUMelcXG/EWA9zaVS9BilWQO3+9j/ht/urIq9gBssqZtmd6Fl13nQq/BV6X JIxpadhAeLvQsbJHcIF3Q== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:v/HWKqz0Fpo=:517yfwHOg/cfji2CK0Hi3P eDcWeYYuDEVALlsczX2X+4CEI3kJHxSyB4VL9bJRthA61D7tT12CQ1zdZcIbg7HMVWqoz/jtu aT6ejQUMdrCb+tJtqOAlk9VdjvAw8SlQuhHFvgGKhxpqqeKMObPnL4n+ezoXXiokCcqu4KaFh 6V2KFqEBCNj5jc9IZXmEhMyW9qiSkapOA6ycVGAkOrkuCDK1uTIkkULIVmyO2AcFl102d6jlo rbwdV3OWsAe3b9KbEBBt6u8TPMJ6t18iA/AGvEtnJuGHm3qjJOza+GQxGw0sJ45DcdOsWjBcB 7L7+KIWZzhb8q62mGf227mHUuzST21zGp+71ZarUwNy6Y7VmnSuLnnfe2OQ+9HeVz0jhaPlam YsWC7jMG02OG2NkIk7n3ZhfF9AOB6i7vrezBJkbqNvC9ZVmf5BhWdSxoOo3A0U0O0fQGU10Ka i0NPrG/KVuhTP48W5arVZedHn4OUOJc/DM4L/jfWmJ3DVrlKuVjR990gA0RYkJZ8G8j7Wy0hB PAe6KGtZeTwf2Rib6su3WHr2trhF7HeUxHLxTH0BtA8CrKnHvPSGNEa0VPm7iAyUkH7MLsrSy Vkf5erw2MNWMOzXJ5YH4xH+G0nLb/FS+TBiTjRlmkd2/3hdEqOJlj4hQN69lIXNCcuKkZ8Nhy r0O+F7nPXx1gopI1Gm/oa9v1+6U5hsHaxAzCf2TcHtTD7T0t1KebM8KdtZJ6A1M0S3S0JIpvw dKuCKuvtDVS9i0Z38tBklxgL/o9rZeVwpx3SedXVGoENt6X7YIf0LI12wgFM8plXmRxRQP7wF WJ1UTRdKfqG5GHQKkcvIjz5qo4ws48eKjpcPsFQLC6nWTiMci2I6O9cyaOcDp1aqV+wBO2G7I 0huxBMCAalxxAPfIqrAoNeqBvykEeQFezGp0oXLXE5uTzE/WkbmvPaNhJawSJ7utJVSlsN7o/ Q318NIRRFFE/nOD3s97kxFrLac81ba7A+eiMP3y6eCdE2Nx7fNNyE+la5NcoK5dIV2CF/2tIP L5O8WXrS4n2EHciX/FhHB07fbyF5aooShqjc7CAhmC+xZF8kKDLLYX1XNthrvvJERrjAvY8JL UgGvVCNWOj7XZUG3kc1rMq2sPRpLt8XkN9/qbDCS695azKwfC61dzsd2g== Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.15.3; envelope-from=michael_heerdegen@HIDDEN; helo=mout.web.de X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) Hello, While talking about the text about FEATURE-unload-hook in (info "(elisp) Coding Conventions") (Bug#21440) the question was raised whether `unload-feature' should try to automatically remove advices (nadvice style) that belong to functions defined by the unloaded feature. Currently these are ignored. I guess it would be a good thing. AFAICT old-style advices were (and are) handled. And the docstring of `unload-feature' covers a lot of cases to care about manually, but it doesn't mention advices. Should it? TIA, Michael.
Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@HIDDEN>:bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN.
Full text available.bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#49674; Package emacs.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.