GNU logs - #49844, boring messages

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#49844: Highlight non-selected minibuffer prompt
Resent-From: Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2021 08:16:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.49844.B.162797854330692 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN>
Organization: LINKOV.NET
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2021 10:47:59 +0300
Message-ID: <87h7g7bhxs.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-="
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.178.231; envelope-from=juri@HIDDEN;
 helo=relay11.mail.gandi.net
X-Spam_score_int: -25
X-Spam_score: -2.6
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch

As suggested in https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2021-08/msg00011.html
here is the patch that implements this feature:


--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/x-diff
Content-Disposition: inline; filename=minibuffer-depth-nonselected.patch

diff --git a/lisp/mb-depth.el b/lisp/mb-depth.el
index 88003afb40..ed0ebf800b 100644
--- a/lisp/mb-depth.el
+++ b/lisp/mb-depth.el
@@ -47,11 +47,36 @@ minibuffer-depth-indicator
   :group 'minibuffer
   :version "28.1")
 
+(defface minibuffer-depth-nonselected
+  '((t (:background "yellow" :foreground "dark red" :weight bold)))
+  "Face for non-selected minibuffer prompts.
+It's used after leaving the minibuffer window while the minibuffer remains active."
+  :group 'minibuffer
+  :version "28.1")
+
+(defcustom minibuffer-depth-indicate-nonselected t
+  "If non-nil, indicate the non-selected minibuffer.
+Use the face `minibuffer-depth-nonselected'."
+  :type 'boolean
+  :group 'minibuffer
+  :version "28.1")
+
 ;; An overlay covering the prompt.  This is a buffer-local variable in
 ;; each affected minibuffer.
 ;;
-(defvar minibuffer-depth-overlay)
-(make-variable-buffer-local 'minibuffer-depth-overlay)
+(defvar-local minibuffer-depth-overlay nil)
+(defvar-local minibuffer-depth-nonselected-overlay nil)
+
+(defun minibuffer-depth-select (w)
+  (if (eq (window-buffer w) (current-buffer))
+      (when (overlayp minibuffer-depth-nonselected-overlay)
+        (delete-overlay minibuffer-depth-nonselected-overlay))
+    (unless (eq major-mode 'completion-list-mode)
+      (with-current-buffer (window-buffer w)
+        (let ((ov (make-overlay (point-min) (point-max))))
+          (overlay-put ov 'face 'minibuffer-depth-nonselected)
+          (overlay-put ov 'evaporate t)
+          (setq minibuffer-depth-nonselected-overlay ov))))))
 
 ;; This function goes on minibuffer-setup-hook
 (defun minibuffer-depth-setup ()
@@ -68,7 +93,9 @@ minibuffer-depth-setup
                                          'face
                                          'minibuffer-depth-indicator)
                              " ")))
-      (overlay-put minibuffer-depth-overlay 'evaporate t))))
+      (overlay-put minibuffer-depth-overlay 'evaporate t)))
+  (when minibuffer-depth-indicate-nonselected
+    (add-hook 'window-state-change-functions 'minibuffer-depth-select nil t)))
 
 ;;;###autoload
 (define-minor-mode minibuffer-depth-indicate-mode

--=-=-=--

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#49844: Acknowledgement (Highlight non-selected minibuffer prompt)
Message-ID: <handler.49844.B.162797854330692.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <87h7g7bhxs.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 49844
X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs
X-Gnu-PR-Keywords: patch
Reply-To: 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2021 08:16:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
49844: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D49844
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#49844: Highlight non-selected minibuffer prompt
Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 07:44:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.49844.B49844.162806298722251 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN>
Cc: 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
References: <87h7g7bhxs.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 09:42:54 +0200
In-Reply-To: <87h7g7bhxs.fsf@HIDDEN> (Juri Linkov's message of "Tue, 
 03 Aug 2021 10:47:59 +0300")
Message-ID: <87tuk5ejup.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN> writes:

> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> As suggested in
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2021-08/msg00011.html
> here is the patch that implements this feature:

I like it -- but does this need to be tied to
minibuffer-depth-indicate-mode?  Indicating that the minibuffer isn't
active in this way may be attractive even if you don't have that
switched on?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#49844: Highlight non-selected minibuffer prompt
Resent-From: Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 08:47:03 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.49844.B49844.162806680527162 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
Cc: 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN>
Organization: LINKOV.NET
References: <87h7g7bhxs.fsf@HIDDEN> <87tuk5ejup.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 11:41:54 +0300
In-Reply-To: <87tuk5ejup.fsf@HIDDEN> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed,
 04 Aug 2021 09:42:54 +0200")
Message-ID: <87wnp1a9f1.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

>> here is the patch that implements this feature:
>
> I like it -- but does this need to be tied to
> minibuffer-depth-indicate-mode?  Indicating that the minibuffer isn't
> active in this way may be attractive even if you don't have that
> switched on?

Yeah, I don't like tying to minibuffer-depth-indicate-mode too.
But I have no idea where to put it otherwise.
Adding a new package for 25 lines makes no sense.

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#49844: Highlight non-selected minibuffer prompt
Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 08:54:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.49844.B49844.162806723430607 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49844
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch
To: Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN>
Cc: 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 49844-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B49844.162806723430607
          (code B ref 49844); Wed, 04 Aug 2021 08:54:01 +0000
Received: (at 49844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2021 08:53:54 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42737 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1mBCew-0007xb-61
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 04:53:54 -0400
Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:38386)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1mBCeu-0007xN-8D
 for 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 04:53:52 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org;
 s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:
 References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:
 Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:
 Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:
 List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
 bh=pFBDe0G5zZAEtZCThV0SbZe1RjRGFTpQ4MItgLwzG5U=; b=UFKTCuMpqbW/2UCNMTLUvmRsfH
 YSS9NXjDsVNI8Wf7Y9ATPoCoygo90//iW17Czg4664AFjVQsHFG0vfA+QDFiCPthCw4rEvmVuRI71
 nU4qSKBzkF/2R5OAduaUZvKDGfp91rWsFpxXg4XeHrHGHB50CoE+FidieYOHnx6vpHpM=;
Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva)
 by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>)
 id 1mBCel-0005p7-IH; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 10:53:46 +0200
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
References: <87h7g7bhxs.fsf@HIDDEN> <87tuk5ejup.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87wnp1a9f1.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 10:53:43 +0200
In-Reply-To: <87wnp1a9f1.fsf@HIDDEN> (Juri Linkov's message of "Wed, 
 04 Aug 2021 11:41:54 +0300")
Message-ID: <87pmutlhew.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
 Content preview: Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN> writes: >>> here is the patch
 that implements this feature: >> >> I like it -- but does this need to be
 tied to >> minibuffer-depth-indicate-mode? Indicating that the minibuffer
 isn't >> active in this way ma [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 [score: 0.0000]
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN> writes:

>>> here is the patch that implements this feature:
>>
>> I like it -- but does this need to be tied to
>> minibuffer-depth-indicate-mode?  Indicating that the minibuffer isn't
>> active in this way may be attractive even if you don't have that
>> switched on?
>
> Yeah, I don't like tying to minibuffer-depth-indicate-mode too.
> But I have no idea where to put it otherwise.
> Adding a new package for 25 lines makes no sense.

Can't we just put it in minibuffer.el?  (But then there should probably
be a user option to switch it on/off.)

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#49844: Highlight non-selected minibuffer prompt
Resent-From: Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 22:05:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.49844.B49844.162811469514075 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49844
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
Cc: 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 49844-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B49844.162811469514075
          (code B ref 49844); Wed, 04 Aug 2021 22:05:01 +0000
Received: (at 49844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2021 22:04:55 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45339 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1mBP0Q-0003ex-PB
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 18:04:54 -0400
Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]:34189)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <juri@HIDDEN>) id 1mBP0N-0003eh-Q0
 for 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 18:04:52 -0400
Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@HIDDEN)
 by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 50DCA1C0002;
 Wed,  4 Aug 2021 22:04:43 +0000 (UTC)
From: Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN>
Organization: LINKOV.NET
References: <87h7g7bhxs.fsf@HIDDEN> <87tuk5ejup.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87wnp1a9f1.fsf@HIDDEN> <87pmutlhew.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 00:32:19 +0300
In-Reply-To: <87pmutlhew.fsf@HIDDEN> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed,
 04 Aug 2021 10:53:43 +0200")
Message-ID: <87pmus27zg.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)

>>> I like it -- but does this need to be tied to
>>> minibuffer-depth-indicate-mode?  Indicating that the minibuffer isn't
>>> active in this way may be attractive even if you don't have that
>>> switched on?
>>
>> Yeah, I don't like tying to minibuffer-depth-indicate-mode too.
>> But I have no idea where to put it otherwise.
>> Adding a new package for 25 lines makes no sense.
>
> Can't we just put it in minibuffer.el?  (But then there should probably
> be a user option to switch it on/off.)

Ironically, minibuffer.el is intended for code that deals with
completions.  Its first line is

  ;;; minibuffer.el --- Minibuffer completion functions

But most code that deals with the minibuffer
is somewhere in the middle of simple.el.

So neither minibuffer.el nor simple.el is suitable.
Perhaps this was the reason why there are a lot of tiny
packages that provide various minibuffer features,
such as mb-depth.el, minibuf-eldef.el, rfn-eshadow.el, etc.

Maybe it would make sense to create a new file with the name e.g.
minibuf-x.el as a mixed bag of tiny minibuffer features?

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#49844: Highlight non-selected minibuffer prompt
Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 05:54:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.49844.B49844.162814283526623 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49844
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch
To: Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN>
Cc: 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@HIDDEN
Received: via spool by 49844-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B49844.162814283526623
          (code B ref 49844); Thu, 05 Aug 2021 05:54:02 +0000
Received: (at 49844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Aug 2021 05:53:55 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45670 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1mBWKJ-0006vL-JM
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 01:53:55 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56996)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1mBWKH-0006v8-RS
 for 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 01:53:54 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:55848)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>)
 id 1mBWKC-0005S2-5I; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 01:53:48 -0400
Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3491
 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>)
 id 1mBWKB-0000mc-P2; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 01:53:48 -0400
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 08:53:46 +0300
Message-Id: <83v94kjv2t.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87pmus27zg.fsf@HIDDEN> (message from Juri Linkov on
 Thu, 05 Aug 2021 00:32:19 +0300)
References: <87h7g7bhxs.fsf@HIDDEN> <87tuk5ejup.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87wnp1a9f1.fsf@HIDDEN> <87pmutlhew.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87pmus27zg.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

> From: Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN>
> Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 00:32:19 +0300
> Cc: 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> > Can't we just put it in minibuffer.el?  (But then there should probably
> > be a user option to switch it on/off.)
> 
> Ironically, minibuffer.el is intended for code that deals with
> completions.  Its first line is
> 
>   ;;; minibuffer.el --- Minibuffer completion functions

That's not carved in stone, though.  We could change that heading
accordingly, and start adding stuff to minibuffer.el that doesn't
necessarily deal with completion.

> But most code that deals with the minibuffer
> is somewhere in the middle of simple.el.

Which is somewhat sub-optimal, I think.

> Maybe it would make sense to create a new file with the name e.g.
> minibuf-x.el as a mixed bag of tiny minibuffer features?

I don't think a new file is justified at this time.

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#49844: Highlight non-selected minibuffer prompt
Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 11:01:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.49844.B49844.162816123123945 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49844
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Cc: 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN>
Received: via spool by 49844-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B49844.162816123123945
          (code B ref 49844); Thu, 05 Aug 2021 11:01:02 +0000
Received: (at 49844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Aug 2021 11:00:31 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46033 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1mBb71-0006E8-5J
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 07:00:31 -0400
Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:52042)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1mBb6z-0006Dv-Hu
 for 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 07:00:30 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org;
 s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:
 References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:
 Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:
 Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:
 List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
 bh=ZMWqbN1OfIVFeb6y6/laH+OJytlV1RNz56K+4kgZ8t4=; b=tNB4mWmsg+kOrsviS0jgHzCwHr
 jPfPQUbhy9EwtKFYBvRIC7D/+x9PHNYh+2Q9VitvXxx6p7QxPXG/jA0qYBZvgc+t3F4DdPNxkSvzh
 n1eKeMjkDx8rqOvN1j0ibyrS/BR4YGzxU8UhbWJEeX5wx5xEIhwodUI8qIIcIxe6DmA0=;
Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva)
 by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>)
 id 1mBb6q-0002nj-Pw; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 13:00:23 +0200
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
References: <87h7g7bhxs.fsf@HIDDEN> <87tuk5ejup.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87wnp1a9f1.fsf@HIDDEN> <87pmutlhew.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87pmus27zg.fsf@HIDDEN> <83v94kjv2t.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 13:00:20 +0200
In-Reply-To: <83v94kjv2t.fsf@HIDDEN> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 05 Aug
 2021 08:53:46 +0300")
Message-ID: <8735roi2bf.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
 Content preview:  Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes: >> Ironically,
 minibuffer.el
 is intended for code that deals with >> completions. Its first line is >>
 >> ; ; ;
 minibuffer.el --- Minibuffer completion functions > > That's not carved
 in stone, though. [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 [score: 0.0000]
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes:

>> Ironically, minibuffer.el is intended for code that deals with
>> completions.  Its first line is
>> 
>>   ;;; minibuffer.el --- Minibuffer completion functions
>
> That's not carved in stone, though.  We could change that heading
> accordingly, and start adding stuff to minibuffer.el that doesn't
> necessarily deal with completion.

And there already is a lot of that in minibuffer.el -- just scroll to
the bottom of the file and page up a bit.  At least the last 100 lines
have nothing to do with completion.

So I think we should just change the heading and put more minibuffer
stuff in minibuffer.el.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#49844: Highlight non-selected minibuffer prompt
Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2021 02:42:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.49844.B49844.163616649616865 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49844
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Cc: 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN>
Received: via spool by 49844-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B49844.163616649616865
          (code B ref 49844); Sat, 06 Nov 2021 02:42:01 +0000
Received: (at 49844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2021 02:41:36 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47954 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1mjBeC-0004Nx-KC
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Nov 2021 22:41:36 -0400
Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:46832)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1mjBeB-0004Nk-H3
 for 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Nov 2021 22:41:35 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org;
 s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:
 References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:
 Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:
 Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:
 List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
 bh=MSGF2pw93727EY48vFhsd2vORXcq+EXJNnp26l+j6y4=; b=nSamB5QdYjrP+JAyAdm28vgbGc
 NLFaWSPTNTC+FceuFupsLXeHPBnvA3dWm6wpvLPKKZeBERCxQnChipdLeXrZvgkErTXnFWljNaJn8
 r+FxlsM4GER+kWXsB9HS4IZ3MYHd3khfRhk1E1rz84Lf9km0JkYKVuwJO8IDuOEcLgUQ=;
Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva)
 by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>)
 id 1mjBe2-00025s-Dj; Sat, 06 Nov 2021 03:41:29 +0100
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
References: <87h7g7bhxs.fsf@HIDDEN> <87tuk5ejup.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87wnp1a9f1.fsf@HIDDEN> <87pmutlhew.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87pmus27zg.fsf@HIDDEN> <83v94kjv2t.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <8735roi2bf.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Now-Playing: Mirry's _Mirry_: "Study in F"
Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2021 03:41:25 +0100
In-Reply-To: <8735roi2bf.fsf@HIDDEN> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu,
 05 Aug 2021 13:00:20 +0200")
Message-ID: <87czneatuy.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
 Content preview:  Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> writes: > So I think we
 should just change the heading and put more minibuffer > stuff in
 minibuffer.el. I've now done so in Emacs 29. 
 Content analysis details:   (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 [score: 0.0000]
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> writes:

> So I think we should just change the heading and put more minibuffer
> stuff in minibuffer.el.

I've now done so in Emacs 29.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#49844: Highlight non-selected minibuffer prompt
Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2021 02:43:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.49844.B49844.163616655016961 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49844
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch
To: Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN>
Cc: 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 49844-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B49844.163616655016961
          (code B ref 49844); Sat, 06 Nov 2021 02:43:02 +0000
Received: (at 49844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2021 02:42:30 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47958 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1mjBf3-0004PV-SJ
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Nov 2021 22:42:30 -0400
Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:46848)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1mjBf2-0004PI-3u
 for 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Nov 2021 22:42:28 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org;
 s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:
 References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:
 Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:
 Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:
 List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
 bh=85gqJrTkmfrBVDCW5oARZMVGxqTRAbFJbpB/YPjcmG8=; b=Niq3Qzm56dJ3J3zc/t5UuM8m82
 HOwH1bBsrKGHWBk+mdJQoCdx+Q/yOXCveD9h7QsAmpSLAAzosQshD4z5fXKyKypWultkm1+VrTLnA
 mHXPYEbQmQjdvkp9Orp7Tr/SrQVy3gZp9UBy/dbV2nh3sW8fFAdfgpG4Chavwo5hb33c=;
Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva)
 by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>)
 id 1mjBet-00026E-8O; Sat, 06 Nov 2021 03:42:22 +0100
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
References: <87h7g7bhxs.fsf@HIDDEN> <87tuk5ejup.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87wnp1a9f1.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Now-Playing: Mirry's _Mirry_: "Study in F"
Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2021 03:42:18 +0100
In-Reply-To: <87wnp1a9f1.fsf@HIDDEN> (Juri Linkov's message of "Wed, 
 04 Aug 2021 11:41:54 +0300")
Message-ID: <878ry2atth.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
 Content preview:  Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN> writes: >> I like it -- but
 does this need to be tied to >> minibuffer-depth-indicate-mode? Indicating
 that the minibuffer isn't >> active in this way may be attractive even if
 you don't have that >> switched [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 [score: 0.0000]
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN> writes:

>> I like it -- but does this need to be tied to
>> minibuffer-depth-indicate-mode?  Indicating that the minibuffer isn't
>> active in this way may be attractive even if you don't have that
>> switched on?
>
> Yeah, I don't like tying to minibuffer-depth-indicate-mode too.
> But I have no idea where to put it otherwise.
> Adding a new package for 25 lines makes no sense.

Juri -- please go ahead and put this in minibuffer.el.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#49844: Highlight non-selected minibuffer prompt
Resent-From: Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2021 19:11:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.49844.B49844.163622582614777 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49844
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
Cc: 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 49844-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B49844.163622582614777
          (code B ref 49844); Sat, 06 Nov 2021 19:11:02 +0000
Received: (at 49844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2021 19:10:26 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50697 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1mjR58-0003qH-JL
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2021 15:10:26 -0400
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:38123)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <juri@HIDDEN>) id 1mjR56-0003q2-T9
 for 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2021 15:10:25 -0400
Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@HIDDEN)
 by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 674D0E0008;
 Sat,  6 Nov 2021 19:10:16 +0000 (UTC)
From: Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN>
Organization: LINKOV.NET
References: <87h7g7bhxs.fsf@HIDDEN> <87tuk5ejup.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87wnp1a9f1.fsf@HIDDEN> <878ry2atth.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2021 20:43:31 +0200
In-Reply-To: <878ry2atth.fsf@HIDDEN> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sat,
 06 Nov 2021 03:42:18 +0100")
Message-ID: <86mtmh6uhw.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)

>>> I like it -- but does this need to be tied to
>>> minibuffer-depth-indicate-mode?  Indicating that the minibuffer isn't
>>> active in this way may be attractive even if you don't have that
>>> switched on?
>>
>> Yeah, I don't like tying to minibuffer-depth-indicate-mode too.
>> But I have no idea where to put it otherwise.
>> Adding a new package for 25 lines makes no sense.
>
> Juri -- please go ahead and put this in minibuffer.el.

ISTR, in bug#50141 we decided to add more generalized code to windmove.el
that will provide 4 customizable types of window backgrounds colors
with different faces:

1. selected window
2. non-selected window
3. selected minibuffer window
4. non-selected minibuffer window

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#49844: Highlight non-selected minibuffer prompt
Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2021 21:15:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.49844.B49844.163623329928203 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49844
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch
To: Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN>
Cc: 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 49844-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B49844.163623329928203
          (code B ref 49844); Sat, 06 Nov 2021 21:15:02 +0000
Received: (at 49844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2021 21:14:59 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50905 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1mjT1f-0007Kp-C3
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2021 17:14:59 -0400
Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:55370)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1mjT1c-0007Kc-Q5
 for 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2021 17:14:58 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org;
 s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:
 References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:
 Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:
 Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:
 List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
 bh=guReOckQNOnAX0Ba7zwLN4v/RL1m0ki8RU4gcdDQA2w=; b=IM+1EpdZxEdpNekCKiQIzi3u0I
 bCrcQMEYvDkbOykKUIqwpc01ZWhcUjg8suBj2qs8xcBGXuYRe1uMMlm1/Qea269hcYg9uguTOFPt4
 G6YwMwCLudeA8K1E9oT4Vzmpad6uVAEHZTeT7QVFJbE2nAyafDavnwpDXtSfg9A0pI3c=;
Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva)
 by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>)
 id 1mjT1T-0001fb-4X; Sat, 06 Nov 2021 22:14:50 +0100
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
References: <87h7g7bhxs.fsf@HIDDEN> <87tuk5ejup.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87wnp1a9f1.fsf@HIDDEN> <878ry2atth.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <86mtmh6uhw.fsf@HIDDEN>
Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj
 SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAIVBMVEUGCAkbIyFcYl8r
 MS6QmZU6SkOrr6t1gXzN3dtukYz///8EiMvvAAAAAWJLR0QKaND0VgAAAAlwSFlzAAAOdAAADnQB
 aySz1gAAAAd0SU1FB+ULBhUBD0uvAxcAAAGdSURBVDjLzZM7c8IwDMelGOgqE2BOgeaOzeE1cwHa
 jiE8ukIIuX4A+g06ZO7Qu37byrk8DAdTl2pwYv3kv2XJBvhPJu/40VJ3gJiZ03a/iusafuENk14x
 qRlaluMIN6JczNCqz5oAmzgAoEut+kyw00rm11piD2st4sZ0qYV7qGc7bBKHx7ACB8RAf5WVLAEe
 Si1xHMkJSrA9Qvdkah0YchhmhyVD6wgoV0heNiGoBQU4cVVRyiyB1trQWgISIyACEVkOjArgayAI
 bAKXLKc6elYF1D2qzcAEffYSL2IhZhcgN5eTbhhgp1cITwsxCCowzSsQ6bFjdKqTK9JtkO9qgoYO
 Fac8igyg+KL16SZQrSLLadkmXU5RP8E1GAHVHDqXAuPihyTZalwIUQUAPZLlReT6lsD2qjQAsSwc
 NPlEU1/lichzCYYK7PZrGgUZkb72ZfehrWAi7bf3NFpx7xngZOHniybhdtsdPKdxD+lJuPFjoRYu
 Bkkc/3yn6WdP7ooXoVd8hIvui5uyzdF8n6j4Wkl7FC6+4Lbde81/sV84Yjaa7jwOHAAAACV0RVh0
 ZGF0ZTpjcmVhdGUAMjAyMS0xMS0wNlQyMTowMToxNSswMDowMLcIiecAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6bW9k
 aWZ5ADIwMjEtMTEtMDZUMjE6MDE6MTUrMDA6MDDGVTFbAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC
X-Now-Playing: Seefeel's _(Ch-Vox) Redux_: "E-hix 3"
Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2021 22:14:46 +0100
In-Reply-To: <86mtmh6uhw.fsf@HIDDEN> (Juri Linkov's message of "Sat, 
 06 Nov 2021 20:43:31 +0200")
Message-ID: <8735o9t29l.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
 Content preview:  Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN> writes: > ISTR, in bug#50141
 we decided to add more generalized code to windmove.el > that will provide
 4 customizable types of window backgrounds colors > with different faces:
 > > 1. selected window > 2. no [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 [score: 0.0000]
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN> writes:

> ISTR, in bug#50141 we decided to add more generalized code to windmove.el
> that will provide 4 customizable types of window backgrounds colors
> with different faces:
>
> 1. selected window
> 2. non-selected window
> 3. selected minibuffer window
> 4. non-selected minibuffer window

But...  isn't think pretty much unrelated to windmove, too?  I'd just
like to have the minibuffer light up when I've moved point somewhere
else (because it can be confusing sometimes).

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#49844: Highlight non-selected minibuffer prompt
Resent-From: Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2021 17:48:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.49844.B49844.163630725425622 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49844
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
Cc: 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 49844-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B49844.163630725425622
          (code B ref 49844); Sun, 07 Nov 2021 17:48:02 +0000
Received: (at 49844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Nov 2021 17:47:34 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54622 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1mjmGU-0006fA-H6
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Nov 2021 12:47:34 -0500
Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.194]:53767)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <juri@HIDDEN>) id 1mjmGS-0006eD-3a
 for 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Nov 2021 12:47:33 -0500
Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@HIDDEN)
 by relay2-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E67BA40004;
 Sun,  7 Nov 2021 17:47:24 +0000 (UTC)
From: Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN>
Organization: LINKOV.NET
References: <87h7g7bhxs.fsf@HIDDEN> <87tuk5ejup.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87wnp1a9f1.fsf@HIDDEN> <878ry2atth.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <86mtmh6uhw.fsf@HIDDEN> <8735o9t29l.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2021 19:31:25 +0200
In-Reply-To: <8735o9t29l.fsf@HIDDEN> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sat,
 06 Nov 2021 22:14:46 +0100")
Message-ID: <868ry0jf16.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)

>> ISTR, in bug#50141 we decided to add more generalized code to windmove.el
>> that will provide 4 customizable types of window backgrounds colors
>> with different faces:
>>
>> 1. selected window
>> 2. non-selected window
>> 3. selected minibuffer window
>> 4. non-selected minibuffer window
>
> But...  isn't think pretty much unrelated to windmove, too?  I'd just
> like to have the minibuffer light up when I've moved point somewhere
> else (because it can be confusing sometimes).

This was intended to address different requests.  So far the requests
were: to highlight the background of the selected window, to highlight
the selected minibuffer window, and to highlight the non-selected
active minibuffer.  The last case actually is more complex:
the non-selected minibuffer should not be highlighted
when the Completions window is selected.  Only after moving point
out of both the minibuffer and the Completions window, the minibuffer
window should be highlighted.

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#49844: Highlight non-selected minibuffer prompt
Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 11:05:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.49844.B49844.166116630232044 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49844
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch
To: Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN>
Cc: 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 49844-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B49844.166116630232044
          (code B ref 49844); Mon, 22 Aug 2022 11:05:02 +0000
Received: (at 49844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Aug 2022 11:05:02 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38103 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1oQ5Er-0008Ke-I8
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 07:05:01 -0400
Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:52950)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1oQ5Ep-0008KP-Sg
 for 49844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 07:05:00 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org;
 s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References:
 In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:
 Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:
 Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:
 List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
 bh=TQ2sbyrFqJJV9V78SM1vV70qzqc6ArocEvSPngotxgI=; b=hroitQ33RoNn4buSQjQn/Bb8gY
 6x2qZ51AbCCKXbuMIaFRcjSCz6A8J8JhOnIumh7n/mvhu1POr+NqsuyuPs5W1s30KcLnX8TZNs6JV
 XtPpLQ863OIqzNQMZiu7zE3oEqZ30HlmYWzsUXOLIsBp34HmVQ9bNMDaBRgyDBJCj23M=;
Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=joga)
 by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>)
 id 1oQ5Eh-0004fr-DU; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 13:04:53 +0200
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <868ry0jf16.fsf@HIDDEN> (Juri Linkov's message of "Sun, 
 07 Nov 2021 19:31:25 +0200")
References: <87h7g7bhxs.fsf@HIDDEN> <87tuk5ejup.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87wnp1a9f1.fsf@HIDDEN> <878ry2atth.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <86mtmh6uhw.fsf@HIDDEN> <8735o9t29l.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <868ry0jf16.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Now-Playing: DMX Krew's _Sound of the Street_: "Sound of the Street"
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 13:04:48 +0200
Message-ID: <87tu648rov.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
 Content preview: Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN> writes: > The last case
 actually
 is more complex: the non-selected minibuffer > should not be highlighted
 when the Completions window is selected. > Only after moving point out of
 both the minibuffer and the [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 [score: 0.0000]
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN> writes:

> The last case actually is more complex: the non-selected minibuffer
> should not be highlighted when the Completions window is selected.
> Only after moving point out of both the minibuffer and the Completions
> window, the minibuffer window should be highlighted.

This was a year ago -- did you make any progress here?

Last modified: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 11:15:01 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.