GNU logs - #49855, boring messages

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#49855: Problem with GNU ELPA build of :core package (Re: [GNU ELPA] So-Long version 1.1)
Resent-From: Phil Sainty <psainty@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 00:18:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.49855.B.162803625317072 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: monnier@HIDDEN
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 12:17:23 +1200
From: Phil Sainty <psainty@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <85czqu2qdw.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <85czqu2qdw.fsf@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <2d94e1d983f91e0322747a86e7a6bcc9@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Orcon Webmail
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=60.234.4.44; envelope-from=psainty@HIDDEN;
 helo=smtp-3.orcon.net.nz
X-Spam_score_int: -25
X-Spam_score: -2.6
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--)

Yesterday I merged[1] so-long v1.1 to the Emacs master branch, and
per the GNU ELPA config[2] I subsequently got a notification email
to say that v1.1 was now on ELPA too; but I've noticed that the
ELPA version is wrong -- the tar file provided at the ELPA page[3]
does not contain the same version that is in Emacs.

It looks like it's taken one of the new commits and made a build
from that, but it's not the revision from the merge, so it's
missing many of the changes.

[1] 
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=3a56d4eea93e2fe832021a0685e2d9fe5bbd034b
[2] 
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/elpa.git/tree/elpa-packages?id=06e26055b3377#n346
[3] https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/so-long.html

Could someone (Stefan?) fix the ELPA version, and see if you can
figure out what went awry here?

I suppose the version may need a bump in case anyone has installed
this already.  Preferably something like 1.1.1 rather than 1.2.


-Phil


On 2021-08-04 09:02, ELPA update wrote:
> Version 1.1 of package So-Long has just been released in GNU ELPA.
> You can now find it in M-x package-list RET.
> 
> So-Long describes itself as:
>   Say farewell to performance problems with minified code.
> 
> More at https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/so-long.html

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Phil Sainty <psainty@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#49855: Acknowledgement (Problem with GNU ELPA build of :core
 package (Re: [GNU ELPA] So-Long version 1.1))
Message-ID: <handler.49855.B.162803625317072.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <2d94e1d983f91e0322747a86e7a6bcc9@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 49855
X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs
Reply-To: 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 00:18:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
49855: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D49855
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#49855: Problem with GNU ELPA build of :core package (Re: [GNU ELPA] So-Long version 1.1)
Resent-From: Phil Sainty <psainty@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 00:40:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.49855.B49855.162803757719124 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: monnier@HIDDEN
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 12:39:33 +1200
From: Phil Sainty <psainty@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <2d94e1d983f91e0322747a86e7a6bcc9@HIDDEN>
References: <85czqu2qdw.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <2d94e1d983f91e0322747a86e7a6bcc9@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <db34044390d56621d0ed43b6abd838c7@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Orcon Webmail
X-Spam_score: -2.9
X-Spam_score_int: -28
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)

On 2021-08-04 12:17, Phil Sainty wrote:
> Could someone (Stefan?) fix the ELPA version, and see if you can
> figure out what went awry here?

I now see that it specifically used the commit in which the
version number changed, and ignored everything which followed,
so I understand what happened now.

That didn't gel very well with my workflow (which was to bump
the version before adding new functionality, and then add the
new features (associating each one with the new version as I
went), and finally merge the branch for the completed release).

I'm not sure if ELPA could be made to recognise that scenario,
or if I'll need to ensure that the final commit always includes
a version bump.

I do understand that it's useful to be able to push changes
without changing the version on ELPA, so that you only create
a new release at the time you intend to, so I'm not asking for
every commit to create a new build; just wondering whether it's
possible to account for the branch merge scenario, where the
merge commit was intended to be the version bump commit.

In the meantime I guess I should commit this change to the
Emacs master branch?

-;; Version: 1.1
+;; Version: 1.1.1

-Phil

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#49855: Problem with GNU ELPA build of :core package (Re: [GNU ELPA] So-Long version 1.1)
Resent-From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 01:00:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.49855.B49855.162803877429187 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Phil Sainty <psainty@HIDDEN>
Cc: 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@HIDDEN
From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob@HIDDEN>
References: <85czqu2qdw.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <2d94e1d983f91e0322747a86e7a6bcc9@HIDDEN>
 <db34044390d56621d0ed43b6abd838c7@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 01:59:23 +0100
In-Reply-To: <db34044390d56621d0ed43b6abd838c7@HIDDEN> (Phil
 Sainty's message of "Wed, 04 Aug 2021 12:39:33 +1200")
Message-ID: <87wnp2kot0.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

Phil Sainty <psainty@HIDDEN> writes:

> On 2021-08-04 12:17, Phil Sainty wrote:
>> Could someone (Stefan?) fix the ELPA version, and see if you can
>> figure out what went awry here?
>
> I now see that it specifically used the commit in which the
> version number changed, and ignored everything which followed,
> so I understand what happened now.
>
> That didn't gel very well with my workflow (which was to bump
> the version before adding new functionality, and then add the
> new features (associating each one with the new version as I
> went), and finally merge the branch for the completed release).
>
> I'm not sure if ELPA could be made to recognise that scenario,
> or if I'll need to ensure that the final commit always includes
> a version bump.
>
> I do understand that it's useful to be able to push changes
> without changing the version on ELPA, so that you only create
> a new release at the time you intend to, so I'm not asking for
> every commit to create a new build; just wondering whether it's
> possible to account for the branch merge scenario, where the
> merge commit was intended to be the version bump commit.

IIUC, something similar was brought up earlier this year:
https://lists.gnu.org/r/emacs-devel/2021-03/msg00490.html

Thanks,

-- 
Basil

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#49855: Problem with GNU ELPA build of :core package (Re: [GNU ELPA] So-Long version 1.1)
Resent-From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 03:25:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.49855.B49855.162804744926884 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49855
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Phil Sainty <psainty@HIDDEN>
Cc: 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 49855-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B49855.162804744926884
          (code B ref 49855); Wed, 04 Aug 2021 03:25:01 +0000
Received: (at 49855) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2021 03:24:09 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42065 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1mB7Vp-0006zY-4r
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 23:24:09 -0400
Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:13399)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <monnier@HIDDEN>) id 1mB7Vm-0006z1-RK
 for 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 23:24:07 -0400
Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id ACEC61001F3;
 Tue,  3 Aug 2021 23:24:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1])
 by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 57854100006;
 Tue,  3 Aug 2021 23:23:58 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca;
 s=mail; t=1628047438;
 bh=zJzbWHaXXMVyia6mCY1hj6KzjGwCBeX9sG0tiRs4m3Q=;
 h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From;
 b=ZaPl+OPoo5ChDA1ekBgpgQV8GpMPKgqRGPrlOKGBJM/DS6/CqZM39Mc5zpWT4elw+
 4iQ+c7T/4nZ4osgDvd085w+exwxdS9uowQVzKynFm7rifX1Ici53ogs44GBlAn3X55
 tZfjmfvdfnq6DbxrTYmwSA4aG1jDItEV8qmF8metxfZDdShwKXRZGhRGbbPGf5ESip
 fjNt9lweqGo5o5rFHNrqouLGC6IeevI/TrLAbIlSpPikWoK8BEjqsmuTn9N1SzXYFb
 rqexgg0+bBJVFtYaSECuY4hcrRThjECvb8sUkCoPezTnB1p8U32KHX7fPTWEm8Vwgr
 nV6y4zRiaB68A==
Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.29.138])
 by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 348DD1201C9;
 Tue,  3 Aug 2021 23:23:58 -0400 (EDT)
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <jwvo8adx5fx.fsf-monnier+emacs@HIDDEN>
References: <85czqu2qdw.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <2d94e1d983f91e0322747a86e7a6bcc9@HIDDEN>
 <db34044390d56621d0ed43b6abd838c7@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2021 23:23:51 -0400
In-Reply-To: <db34044390d56621d0ed43b6abd838c7@HIDDEN> (Phil
 Sainty's message of "Wed, 04 Aug 2021 12:39:33 +1200")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-SPAM-INFO: Spam detection results:  0
 ALL_TRUSTED                -1 Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 AWL -0.094 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DKIM_SIGNED               0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
 not necessarily valid
 DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
 DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
 domain
X-SPAM-LEVEL: 
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

> That didn't gel very well with my workflow (which was to bump
> the version before adding new functionality, and then add the
> new features (associating each one with the new version as I
> went), and finally merge the branch for the completed release).

What I can suggest in that case is to do:

1- bump the version from `AA.BB` to `CC.DD-git`
2- hack hack hack
3- when done, bump the version from `CC.DD-git` to `CC.DD`


        Stefan

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#49855: Problem with GNU ELPA build of :core package (Re: [GNU ELPA] So-Long version 1.1)
Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 08:12:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.49855.B49855.16280646681309 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49855
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Phil Sainty <psainty@HIDDEN>
Cc: 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@HIDDEN
Received: via spool by 49855-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B49855.16280646681309
          (code B ref 49855); Wed, 04 Aug 2021 08:12:01 +0000
Received: (at 49855) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2021 08:11:08 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42614 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1mBBzX-0000L1-GN
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 04:11:07 -0400
Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:38016)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1mBBzQ-0000KP-2e
 for 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 04:11:06 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org;
 s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:
 References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:
 Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:
 Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:
 List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
 bh=AD2VRgtjAeRb1YI6laS3DcNTX1b/nqRhJzQlnoKGDIk=; b=tLE7b7pftoZ4GozLnnPAXUkY8g
 tvVKog3MSau7tHsjQSgDlBK7IYTYlGzEtZDFYogARV4rcnK69D9jrf7oe9aoc+2LP+GiZc6Cb2xcA
 oc+gdv1cP9Bif/QEnUHBrbsL1/qp7wD6BFQQ6362FF4gCDBu0kiV9/B8QAvjKYE8nmPY=;
Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva)
 by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>)
 id 1mBBzF-0005VK-OK; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 10:10:52 +0200
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
References: <85czqu2qdw.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <2d94e1d983f91e0322747a86e7a6bcc9@HIDDEN>
 <db34044390d56621d0ed43b6abd838c7@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 10:10:49 +0200
In-Reply-To: <db34044390d56621d0ed43b6abd838c7@HIDDEN> (Phil
 Sainty's message of "Wed, 04 Aug 2021 12:39:33 +1200")
Message-ID: <87czqteik6.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
 Content preview: Phil Sainty <psainty@HIDDEN> writes: > I do understand
 that it's useful to be able to push changes > without changing the version
 on ELPA, so that you only create > a new release at the time you intend to,
 so I'm not asking for > every c [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 [score: 0.0000]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Phil Sainty <psainty@HIDDEN> writes:

> I do understand that it's useful to be able to push changes
> without changing the version on ELPA, so that you only create
> a new release at the time you intend to, so I'm not asking for
> every commit to create a new build; just wondering whether it's
> possible to account for the branch merge scenario, where the
> merge commit was intended to be the version bump commit.

I don't really think there's any way to determine the intention here.
The developer may be working in a branch, fix something, bump the
number, fix some more (but doesn't want that to land in ELPA yet), and
then merge, for instance.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#49855: Problem with GNU ELPA build of :core package (Re: [GNU ELPA] So-Long version 1.1)
Resent-From: Phil Sainty <psainty@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 12:32:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.49855.B49855.162808028612612 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49855
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
Cc: 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@HIDDEN
Received: via spool by 49855-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B49855.162808028612612
          (code B ref 49855); Wed, 04 Aug 2021 12:32:02 +0000
Received: (at 49855) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2021 12:31:26 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43068 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1mBG3S-0003HM-7X
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 08:31:26 -0400
Received: from smtp-4.orcon.net.nz ([60.234.4.59]:60005)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <psainty@HIDDEN>) id 1mBG3Q-0003HA-CB
 for 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 08:31:25 -0400
Received: from [10.253.37.70] (port=46283 helo=webmail.orcon.net.nz)
 by smtp-4.orcon.net.nz with esmtpa (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <psainty@HIDDEN>)
 id 1mBG3M-0004KZ-7v; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 00:31:21 +1200
Received: from ip-116-251-162-85.kinect.net.nz ([116.251.162.85])
 via [10.253.37.253] by webmail.orcon.net.nz
 with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Thu, 05 Aug 2021 00:31:20 +1200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 00:31:20 +1200
From: Phil Sainty <psainty@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87czqteik6.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <85czqu2qdw.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <2d94e1d983f91e0322747a86e7a6bcc9@HIDDEN>
 <db34044390d56621d0ed43b6abd838c7@HIDDEN>
 <87czqteik6.fsf@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <532c06a4ff892539bc35868acd2fa0d6@HIDDEN>
X-Sender: psainty@HIDDEN
User-Agent: Orcon Webmail
X-GeoIP: --
X-Spam_score: -2.9
X-Spam_score_int: -28
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)

On 2021-08-04 20:10, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
> I don't really think there's any way to determine the intention here.
> The developer may be working in a branch, fix something, bump the
> number, fix some more (but doesn't want that to land in ELPA yet), and
> then merge, for instance.

I guess so.  It seems a less-likely workflow to my mind, but that may
just be my own habits and biases talking.

Still, it would be good if we could at least reduce the chances of 
people
getting tripped up by this.  Taking a different tack, perhaps we just 
need
a more detailed (or an additional) notification email.

At present I'm sent this:

> Subject: [GNU ELPA] So-Long version 1.1.1
> From: ELPA update <do.not.reply@HIDDEN>
> To: gnu-emacs-sources@HIDDEN
> Cc: Phil Sainty <psainty@HIDDEN>
> Reply-To: help-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
> 
> Version 1.1.1 of package So-Long has just been released in GNU ELPA.
> You can now find it in M-x package-list RET.
> 
> So-Long describes itself as:
>   Say farewell to performance problems with minified code.
> 
> More at https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/so-long.html


If in addition to that information, it also showed the commit hash and
message which was used to build the release, I would have immediately
seen that I'd messed up.  Something like:

> Build details:
> Commit 359a8e4eda047b7dcb7e64faff7f8eaacf5d937c
> ; * lisp/so-long.el: Bump to version 1.1

I'm not sure whether it's appropriate to include such details in that
particular notification, or if it would be better to send a separate
message to the maintainer; but either way these details would provide
direct confirmation as to whether the thing you thought had happened
had actually happened.

As it was, I thought I'd released "version 1.1", and the notification
told me that I'd done exactly that, and so I was completely confident
that everything was correct until I found that it wasn't.  I suspect
that if I hadn't done a sanity-check then I might not realised anything
was wrong until someone else told me.


-Phil

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#49855: Problem with GNU ELPA build of :core package (Re: [GNU ELPA] So-Long version 1.1)
Resent-From: Phil Sainty <psainty@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 22:25:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.49855.B49855.162811584616034 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49855
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
Cc: 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@HIDDEN
Received: via spool by 49855-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B49855.162811584616034
          (code B ref 49855); Wed, 04 Aug 2021 22:25:02 +0000
Received: (at 49855) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2021 22:24:06 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45350 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1mBPIz-0004AY-QB
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 18:24:05 -0400
Received: from smtp-3.orcon.net.nz ([60.234.4.44]:34111)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <psainty@HIDDEN>) id 1mBPIy-0004AQ-9u
 for 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 18:24:04 -0400
Received: from [10.253.37.70] (port=43844 helo=webmail.orcon.net.nz)
 by smtp-3.orcon.net.nz with esmtpa (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <psainty@HIDDEN>)
 id 1mBPIv-0002ps-8m; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 10:24:01 +1200
Received: from ip-116-251-162-85.kinect.net.nz ([116.251.162.85])
 via [10.253.37.253] by webmail.orcon.net.nz
 with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Thu, 05 Aug 2021 10:24:00 +1200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 10:24:00 +1200
From: Phil Sainty <psainty@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <532c06a4ff892539bc35868acd2fa0d6@HIDDEN>
References: <85czqu2qdw.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <2d94e1d983f91e0322747a86e7a6bcc9@HIDDEN>
 <db34044390d56621d0ed43b6abd838c7@HIDDEN>
 <87czqteik6.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <532c06a4ff892539bc35868acd2fa0d6@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <8fd9cea58be3da60b914590d7e3af17e@HIDDEN>
X-Sender: psainty@HIDDEN
User-Agent: Orcon Webmail
X-GeoIP: --
X-Spam_score: -2.9
X-Spam_score_int: -28
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)

On 2021-08-05 00:31, Phil Sainty wrote:
> At present I'm sent this:
>> Subject: [GNU ELPA] So-Long version 1.1.1

Please pretend that I'd shown the 1.1 notification message there,
rather than 1.1.1, so that the rest of that email makes better sense :)

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#49855: Problem with GNU ELPA build of :core package (Re: [GNU ELPA] So-Long version 1.1)
Resent-From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 22:34:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.49855.B49855.162811640916980 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49855
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Phil Sainty <psainty@HIDDEN>
Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>, 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 49855-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B49855.162811640916980
          (code B ref 49855); Wed, 04 Aug 2021 22:34:01 +0000
Received: (at 49855) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2021 22:33:29 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45356 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1mBPS4-0004Po-NF
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 18:33:28 -0400
Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:2003)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <monnier@HIDDEN>) id 1mBPS3-0004Pc-1w
 for 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 18:33:27 -0400
Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D350180AA9;
 Wed,  4 Aug 2021 18:33:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1])
 by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7A6E180533;
 Wed,  4 Aug 2021 18:33:19 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca;
 s=mail; t=1628116399;
 bh=j94lZsdg728SxoJ0EAcHFmBaEqzF5G0i35a9r4RRe/Q=;
 h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From;
 b=Fca0FMsXmYVBgRCEc0nqr1RVDbtMu2obs/g+BW/QJoECyASsOuBdhsXF8KqvsCz+j
 0JemsJBs4OXAhi9WimnG+kHSOW2Ef0C972N0jbYqPePjFlg1+NbOVux5R13cGfxjWr
 cyZRKR7aaTrKHAwsnRvcFVA1CYG69gw7zQ6KVMOrwKjakd4b/H87cv9PaNoaz7GTEd
 hD6+NS8wxNOeL0beaLY1EyFIdBf+zroHaaUSCl8bWyDfPWVfxfC5uLfSlie+AURjqL
 1f2xBFnxXUVCOO6b3x4+YYFK+cxF4P6SRGrEQMRqGQ0rTZT4csMI7rjrYZah6RTw8Y
 rI5thUWeoWYZg==
Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.29.138])
 by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49FA812039B;
 Wed,  4 Aug 2021 18:33:19 -0400 (EDT)
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <jwv8s1gu9ls.fsf-monnier+emacs@HIDDEN>
References: <85czqu2qdw.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <2d94e1d983f91e0322747a86e7a6bcc9@HIDDEN>
 <db34044390d56621d0ed43b6abd838c7@HIDDEN>
 <87czqteik6.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <532c06a4ff892539bc35868acd2fa0d6@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 18:33:18 -0400
In-Reply-To: <532c06a4ff892539bc35868acd2fa0d6@HIDDEN> (Phil
 Sainty's message of "Thu, 05 Aug 2021 00:31:20 +1200")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-SPAM-INFO: Spam detection results:  0
 ALL_TRUSTED                -1 Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 AWL -0.093 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DKIM_SIGNED               0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
 not necessarily valid
 DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
 DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
 domain
X-SPAM-LEVEL: 
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

> If in addition to that information, it also showed the commit hash and
> message which was used to build the release, I would have immediately
> seen that I'd messed up.  Something like:
>
>> Build details:
>> Commit 359a8e4eda047b7dcb7e64faff7f8eaacf5d937c
>> ; * lisp/so-long.el: Bump to version 1.1

Makes sense and sounds good.

> I'm not sure whether it's appropriate to include such details in that
> particular notification, or if it would be better to send a separate
> message to the maintainer;

I think we can keep it as a single message.
We could add something giving the commit id, the date of the commit
(personally, commit ids don't speak to me, but the commit date
might tip me off), and the first line of the commit message.
Seems short enough that it can fit before the NEWS without bothering
those readers who don't care about it.

Do you think you can come up with a patch against `elpa-admin.el`
doing that?


        Stefan

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#49855: Problem with GNU ELPA build of :core package (Re: [GNU ELPA] So-Long version 1.1)
Resent-From: Phil Sainty <psainty@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 13:12:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.49855.B49855.162816909520086 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49855
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>, 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 49855-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B49855.162816909520086
          (code B ref 49855); Thu, 05 Aug 2021 13:12:02 +0000
Received: (at 49855) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Aug 2021 13:11:35 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46166 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1mBd9r-0005Du-AL
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 09:11:35 -0400
Received: from smtp-3.orcon.net.nz ([60.234.4.44]:55469)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <psainty@HIDDEN>) id 1mBd9p-0005Dk-JG
 for 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 09:11:34 -0400
Received: from [10.253.37.70] (port=62456 helo=webmail.orcon.net.nz)
 by smtp-3.orcon.net.nz with esmtpa (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <psainty@HIDDEN>)
 id 1mBd9j-0000Lw-5n; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 01:11:27 +1200
Received: from ip-116-251-162-85.kinect.net.nz ([116.251.162.85])
 via [10.253.37.253] by webmail.orcon.net.nz
 with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Fri, 06 Aug 2021 01:11:27 +1200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 01:11:27 +1200
From: Phil Sainty <psainty@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <jwv8s1gu9ls.fsf-monnier+emacs@HIDDEN>
References: <85czqu2qdw.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <2d94e1d983f91e0322747a86e7a6bcc9@HIDDEN>
 <db34044390d56621d0ed43b6abd838c7@HIDDEN>
 <87czqteik6.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <532c06a4ff892539bc35868acd2fa0d6@HIDDEN>
 <jwv8s1gu9ls.fsf-monnier+emacs@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <516b0a129400626e4c99a48f64f10129@HIDDEN>
X-Sender: psainty@HIDDEN
User-Agent: Orcon Webmail
X-GeoIP: --
X-Spam_score: -2.9
X-Spam_score_int: -28
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)

On 2021-08-05 10:33, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> Do you think you can come up with a patch against `elpa-admin.el`
> doing that?

Yes, I think I can take a stab at that.

My initial foray has raised one item of potential interest:

Git 2.22 Release Notes
======================
  * "git log -L<from>,<to>:<path>" with "-s" did not suppress the patch
    output as it should.  This has been corrected.
    (merge 05314efaea jk/line-log-with-patch later to maint).

I don't know whether there's any reason to support older git
versions, but I'm using git 2.17.1 and so the command generated
by `elpaa--get-release-revision' gives me this:

$ git log -n1 --no-patch --pretty=format:%H -L '/^;;* 
*\(Package-\)\?Version:/,+1:lisp/so-long.el'
b84986af52d4e9debace2850a5ec106f51e38e61
diff --git a/lisp/so-long.el b/lisp/so-long.el
--- a/lisp/so-long.el
+++ b/lisp/so-long.el
@@ -11,1 +11,1 @@
-;; Version: 1.1
+;; Version: 1.1.1

I didn't twig initially that I wasn't seeing the intended
output, and spent a while fruitlessly wondering where in the
elisp that got trimmed down to a single line...


-Phil

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#49855: Problem with GNU ELPA build of :core package (Re: [GNU ELPA] So-Long version 1.1)
Resent-From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 14:33:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.49855.B49855.162817394329347 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49855
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Phil Sainty <psainty@HIDDEN>
Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>, 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 49855-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B49855.162817394329347
          (code B ref 49855); Thu, 05 Aug 2021 14:33:01 +0000
Received: (at 49855) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Aug 2021 14:32:23 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48018 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1mBeQ3-0007dH-3A
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 10:32:23 -0400
Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:46538)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <monnier@HIDDEN>) id 1mBeQ1-0007d0-0B
 for 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 10:32:21 -0400
Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CEC16440A55;
 Thu,  5 Aug 2021 10:32:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1])
 by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B54A3440836;
 Thu,  5 Aug 2021 10:32:13 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca;
 s=mail; t=1628173933;
 bh=kizbWayxj0EdN/HhX+uxEY+rp4sV10XqfUaJaiO/zAI=;
 h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From;
 b=lc2bJT4WXpCB+uctwbc+rTOdZMhS7jxeNGzMuTFWdPLCOlTsXbltXfHBL8cAai1+J
 XBOpYY4qxcANb5kVJRq6xqYxA8NAegme3TGn2UpTJM3EMhFdUQ0R5Yvc2799Otmvwz
 HG/EhMZacZp0h6DsK23ehNlEyxYkAPAKxwP0zzkTDK3lHlFMnOO8EBDEhY1uSHiGWc
 5qmGki5GO25FaVrqcp9C6xkVSOAcYXvyBvNi4pXHwSkP3HQ9PYyLxp1IyiBnJtzMzG
 mYaUenU+hC6FmJ/v5cYDqYZZPieh6J1eTVqx/7C/geaBqHm6VG8aIBu50SNbSy/Ztq
 5aJFG2yTZLJEw==
Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.29.138])
 by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 885A11202BC;
 Thu,  5 Aug 2021 10:32:13 -0400 (EDT)
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <jwv4kc4rmoy.fsf-monnier+emacs@HIDDEN>
References: <85czqu2qdw.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <2d94e1d983f91e0322747a86e7a6bcc9@HIDDEN>
 <db34044390d56621d0ed43b6abd838c7@HIDDEN>
 <87czqteik6.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <532c06a4ff892539bc35868acd2fa0d6@HIDDEN>
 <jwv8s1gu9ls.fsf-monnier+emacs@HIDDEN>
 <516b0a129400626e4c99a48f64f10129@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 10:32:12 -0400
In-Reply-To: <516b0a129400626e4c99a48f64f10129@HIDDEN> (Phil
 Sainty's message of "Fri, 06 Aug 2021 01:11:27 +1200")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-SPAM-INFO: Spam detection results:  0
 ALL_TRUSTED                -1 Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 AWL -0.092 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DKIM_SIGNED               0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
 not necessarily valid
 DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
 DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
 domain
X-SPAM-LEVEL: 
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

> Git 2.22 Release Notes
> ======================
>  * "git log -L<from>,<to>:<path>" with "-s" did not suppress the patch
>    output as it should.  This has been corrected.
>    (merge 05314efaea jk/line-log-with-patch later to maint).
>
> I don't know whether there's any reason to support older git
> versions, but I'm using git 2.17.1 and so the command generated
> by `elpaa--get-release-revision' gives me this:
>
> $ git log -n1 --no-patch --pretty=format:%H -L '/^;;*
> *\(Package-\)\?Version:/,+1:lisp/so-long.el'
> b84986af52d4e9debace2850a5ec106f51e38e61
> diff --git a/lisp/so-long.el b/lisp/so-long.el
> --- a/lisp/so-long.el
> +++ b/lisp/so-long.el
> @@ -11,1 +11,1 @@
> -;; Version: 1.1
> +;; Version: 1.1.1
>
> I didn't twig initially that I wasn't seeing the intended
> output, and spent a while fruitlessly wondering where in the
> elisp that got trimmed down to a single line...

Interesting.  `elpa.gnu.org` is running a more recent version of Git
because the older Git crashed in this same `elpaa--get-release-revision`
in some cases :-(

Debian stable is still on Git-2.20 so it might be worth adding
a workaround in `elpaa--get-release-revision` (tho a new Debian release
is due any day now, IIUC).


        Stefan

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#49855: Problem with GNU ELPA build of :core package (Re: [GNU ELPA] So-Long version 1.1)
Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 11:09:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.49855.B49855.166116649532333 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49855
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Cc: Phil Sainty <psainty@HIDDEN>, 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 49855-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B49855.166116649532333
          (code B ref 49855); Mon, 22 Aug 2022 11:09:01 +0000
Received: (at 49855) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Aug 2022 11:08:15 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38107 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1oQ5Hz-0008PQ-4M
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 07:08:15 -0400
Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:53058)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1oQ5Hx-0008PF-Mf
 for 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 07:08:14 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org;
 s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References:
 In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:
 Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:
 Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:
 List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
 bh=GPXODwlZUnse1m/L3KFb0BPN/Hij1LnSGWhDyihlh0k=; b=eD+FXlw1SGNAa/dqA08BiAsc+R
 WCdqM5wiZ23TFxAdPUf8thw2o3V8CcUtlINi956h2TUOZZLrkggaVqLGn/2LNHpM+0UPR8D7QYOdD
 AcLSYlsLEy/Ul20C0OT1B+46XE+eQxCNOJgAROn+h4xFRYqdyFPCDzc/02G+x0JCkYTA=;
Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=joga)
 by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>)
 id 1oQ5Hj-0004ij-Df; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 13:08:05 +0200
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <jwv4kc4rmoy.fsf-monnier+emacs@HIDDEN> (Stefan Monnier's message
 of "Thu, 05 Aug 2021 10:32:12 -0400")
References: <85czqu2qdw.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <2d94e1d983f91e0322747a86e7a6bcc9@HIDDEN>
 <db34044390d56621d0ed43b6abd838c7@HIDDEN>
 <87czqteik6.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <532c06a4ff892539bc35868acd2fa0d6@HIDDEN>
 <jwv8s1gu9ls.fsf-monnier+emacs@HIDDEN>
 <516b0a129400626e4c99a48f64f10129@HIDDEN>
 <jwv4kc4rmoy.fsf-monnier+emacs@HIDDEN>
X-Now-Playing: DMX Krew's _Sound of the Street_: "Rock to the Beat"
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 13:07:58 +0200
Message-ID: <87pmgs8rjl.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
 Content preview:  Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN> writes: > Debian
 stable is still on Git-2.20 so it might be worth adding > a workaround in
 `elpaa--get-release-revision` (tho a new Debian release > is due any day
 now, IIUC). 
 Content analysis details:   (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 [score: 0.0000]
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN> writes:

> Debian stable is still on Git-2.20 so it might be worth adding
> a workaround in `elpaa--get-release-revision` (tho a new Debian release
> is due any day now, IIUC).

This was a year ago, so perhaps the machine has been updated now?

Anyway -- Phil, did you get any further with the proposed changes to
elpa-admin.el?

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#49855: Problem with GNU ELPA build of :core package (Re: [GNU ELPA] So-Long version 1.1)
Resent-From: Phil Sainty <psainty@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 11:25:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.49855.B49855.16611674859785 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49855
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
Cc: 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Received: via spool by 49855-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B49855.16611674859785
          (code B ref 49855); Mon, 22 Aug 2022 11:25:02 +0000
Received: (at 49855) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Aug 2022 11:24:45 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38132 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1oQ5Xx-0002Xk-Fq
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 07:24:45 -0400
Received: from smtp-1.orcon.net.nz ([60.234.4.34]:35011)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <psainty@HIDDEN>) id 1oQ5Xu-0002Xb-Nc
 for 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 07:24:43 -0400
Received: from [10.253.37.70] (port=48823 helo=webmail.orcon.net.nz)
 by smtp-1.orcon.net.nz with esmtpa (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <psainty@HIDDEN>)
 id 1oQ5Xm-0001pC-MP; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 23:24:34 +1200
Received: from ip-116-251-140-135.kinect.net.nz ([116.251.140.135])
 via [10.253.37.253] by webmail.orcon.net.nz
 with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Mon, 22 Aug 2022 23:24:34 +1200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 23:24:34 +1200
From: Phil Sainty <psainty@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87pmgs8rjl.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <85czqu2qdw.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <2d94e1d983f91e0322747a86e7a6bcc9@HIDDEN>
 <db34044390d56621d0ed43b6abd838c7@HIDDEN>
 <87czqteik6.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <532c06a4ff892539bc35868acd2fa0d6@HIDDEN>
 <jwv8s1gu9ls.fsf-monnier+emacs@HIDDEN>
 <516b0a129400626e4c99a48f64f10129@HIDDEN>
 <jwv4kc4rmoy.fsf-monnier+emacs@HIDDEN> <87pmgs8rjl.fsf@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <8399810b559dd417ac8793abfce32146@HIDDEN>
X-Sender: psainty@HIDDEN
User-Agent: Orcon Webmail
X-GeoIP: --
X-Spam_score: -2.9
X-Spam_score_int: -28
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

On 2022-08-22 23:07, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
> Anyway -- Phil, did you get any further with the proposed changes
> to elpa-admin.el?

I have work-in-progress for that on this machine, yes.

I'll have to try to get back to it.

Last modified: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 11:30:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.