Received: (at 49855) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Aug 2022 11:24:45 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Aug 22 07:24:45 2022 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38132 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1oQ5Xx-0002Xk-Fq for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 07:24:45 -0400 Received: from smtp-1.orcon.net.nz ([60.234.4.34]:35011) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <psainty@HIDDEN>) id 1oQ5Xu-0002Xb-Nc for 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 07:24:43 -0400 Received: from [10.253.37.70] (port=48823 helo=webmail.orcon.net.nz) by smtp-1.orcon.net.nz with esmtpa (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <psainty@HIDDEN>) id 1oQ5Xm-0001pC-MP; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 23:24:34 +1200 Received: from ip-116-251-140-135.kinect.net.nz ([116.251.140.135]) via [10.253.37.253] by webmail.orcon.net.nz with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Mon, 22 Aug 2022 23:24:34 +1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 23:24:34 +1200 From: Phil Sainty <psainty@HIDDEN> To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#49855: Problem with GNU ELPA build of :core package (Re: [GNU ELPA] So-Long version 1.1) In-Reply-To: <87pmgs8rjl.fsf@HIDDEN> References: <85czqu2qdw.fsf@HIDDEN> <2d94e1d983f91e0322747a86e7a6bcc9@HIDDEN> <db34044390d56621d0ed43b6abd838c7@HIDDEN> <87czqteik6.fsf@HIDDEN> <532c06a4ff892539bc35868acd2fa0d6@HIDDEN> <jwv8s1gu9ls.fsf-monnier+emacs@HIDDEN> <516b0a129400626e4c99a48f64f10129@HIDDEN> <jwv4kc4rmoy.fsf-monnier+emacs@HIDDEN> <87pmgs8rjl.fsf@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <8399810b559dd417ac8793abfce32146@HIDDEN> X-Sender: psainty@HIDDEN User-Agent: Orcon Webmail X-GeoIP: -- X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49855 Cc: 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On 2022-08-22 23:07, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Anyway -- Phil, did you get any further with the proposed changes > to elpa-admin.el? I have work-in-progress for that on this machine, yes. I'll have to try to get back to it.
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#49855; Package emacs.
Full text available.Received: (at 49855) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Aug 2022 11:08:15 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Aug 22 07:08:15 2022 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38107 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1oQ5Hz-0008PQ-4M for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 07:08:15 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:53058) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1oQ5Hx-0008PF-Mf for 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 07:08:14 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=GPXODwlZUnse1m/L3KFb0BPN/Hij1LnSGWhDyihlh0k=; b=eD+FXlw1SGNAa/dqA08BiAsc+R WCdqM5wiZ23TFxAdPUf8thw2o3V8CcUtlINi956h2TUOZZLrkggaVqLGn/2LNHpM+0UPR8D7QYOdD AcLSYlsLEy/Ul20C0OT1B+46XE+eQxCNOJgAROn+h4xFRYqdyFPCDzc/02G+x0JCkYTA=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=joga) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1oQ5Hj-0004ij-Df; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 13:08:05 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#49855: Problem with GNU ELPA build of :core package (Re: [GNU ELPA] So-Long version 1.1) In-Reply-To: <jwv4kc4rmoy.fsf-monnier+emacs@HIDDEN> (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 05 Aug 2021 10:32:12 -0400") References: <85czqu2qdw.fsf@HIDDEN> <2d94e1d983f91e0322747a86e7a6bcc9@HIDDEN> <db34044390d56621d0ed43b6abd838c7@HIDDEN> <87czqteik6.fsf@HIDDEN> <532c06a4ff892539bc35868acd2fa0d6@HIDDEN> <jwv8s1gu9ls.fsf-monnier+emacs@HIDDEN> <516b0a129400626e4c99a48f64f10129@HIDDEN> <jwv4kc4rmoy.fsf-monnier+emacs@HIDDEN> X-Now-Playing: DMX Krew's _Sound of the Street_: "Rock to the Beat" Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 13:07:58 +0200 Message-ID: <87pmgs8rjl.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN> writes: > Debian stable is still on Git-2.20 so it might be worth adding > a workaround in `elpaa--get-release-revision` (tho a new Debian release > is due any day now, IIUC). Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49855 Cc: Phil Sainty <psainty@HIDDEN>, 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN> writes: > Debian stable is still on Git-2.20 so it might be worth adding > a workaround in `elpaa--get-release-revision` (tho a new Debian release > is due any day now, IIUC). This was a year ago, so perhaps the machine has been updated now? Anyway -- Phil, did you get any further with the proposed changes to elpa-admin.el?
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#49855; Package emacs.
Full text available.
Received: (at 49855) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Aug 2021 14:32:23 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 05 10:32:23 2021
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48018 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1mBeQ3-0007dH-3A
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 10:32:23 -0400
Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:46538)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <monnier@HIDDEN>) id 1mBeQ1-0007d0-0B
for 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 10:32:21 -0400
Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CEC16440A55;
Thu, 5 Aug 2021 10:32:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1])
by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B54A3440836;
Thu, 5 Aug 2021 10:32:13 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca;
s=mail; t=1628173933;
bh=kizbWayxj0EdN/HhX+uxEY+rp4sV10XqfUaJaiO/zAI=;
h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From;
b=lc2bJT4WXpCB+uctwbc+rTOdZMhS7jxeNGzMuTFWdPLCOlTsXbltXfHBL8cAai1+J
XBOpYY4qxcANb5kVJRq6xqYxA8NAegme3TGn2UpTJM3EMhFdUQ0R5Yvc2799Otmvwz
HG/EhMZacZp0h6DsK23ehNlEyxYkAPAKxwP0zzkTDK3lHlFMnOO8EBDEhY1uSHiGWc
5qmGki5GO25FaVrqcp9C6xkVSOAcYXvyBvNi4pXHwSkP3HQ9PYyLxp1IyiBnJtzMzG
mYaUenU+hC6FmJ/v5cYDqYZZPieh6J1eTVqx/7C/geaBqHm6VG8aIBu50SNbSy/Ztq
5aJFG2yTZLJEw==
Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.29.138])
by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 885A11202BC;
Thu, 5 Aug 2021 10:32:13 -0400 (EDT)
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
To: Phil Sainty <psainty@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#49855: Problem with GNU ELPA build of :core package (Re:
[GNU ELPA] So-Long version 1.1)
Message-ID: <jwv4kc4rmoy.fsf-monnier+emacs@HIDDEN>
References: <85czqu2qdw.fsf@HIDDEN>
<2d94e1d983f91e0322747a86e7a6bcc9@HIDDEN>
<db34044390d56621d0ed43b6abd838c7@HIDDEN>
<87czqteik6.fsf@HIDDEN>
<532c06a4ff892539bc35868acd2fa0d6@HIDDEN>
<jwv8s1gu9ls.fsf-monnier+emacs@HIDDEN>
<516b0a129400626e4c99a48f64f10129@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 10:32:12 -0400
In-Reply-To: <516b0a129400626e4c99a48f64f10129@HIDDEN> (Phil
Sainty's message of "Fri, 06 Aug 2021 01:11:27 +1200")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-SPAM-INFO: Spam detection results: 0
ALL_TRUSTED -1 Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
AWL -0.092 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
domain
X-SPAM-LEVEL:
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49855
Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>, 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)
> Git 2.22 Release Notes
> ======================
> * "git log -L<from>,<to>:<path>" with "-s" did not suppress the patch
> output as it should. This has been corrected.
> (merge 05314efaea jk/line-log-with-patch later to maint).
>
> I don't know whether there's any reason to support older git
> versions, but I'm using git 2.17.1 and so the command generated
> by `elpaa--get-release-revision' gives me this:
>
> $ git log -n1 --no-patch --pretty=format:%H -L '/^;;*
> *\(Package-\)\?Version:/,+1:lisp/so-long.el'
> b84986af52d4e9debace2850a5ec106f51e38e61
> diff --git a/lisp/so-long.el b/lisp/so-long.el
> --- a/lisp/so-long.el
> +++ b/lisp/so-long.el
> @@ -11,1 +11,1 @@
> -;; Version: 1.1
> +;; Version: 1.1.1
>
> I didn't twig initially that I wasn't seeing the intended
> output, and spent a while fruitlessly wondering where in the
> elisp that got trimmed down to a single line...
Interesting. `elpa.gnu.org` is running a more recent version of Git
because the older Git crashed in this same `elpaa--get-release-revision`
in some cases :-(
Debian stable is still on Git-2.20 so it might be worth adding
a workaround in `elpaa--get-release-revision` (tho a new Debian release
is due any day now, IIUC).
Stefan
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#49855; Package emacs.
Full text available.
Received: (at 49855) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Aug 2021 13:11:35 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 05 09:11:35 2021
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46166 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1mBd9r-0005Du-AL
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 09:11:35 -0400
Received: from smtp-3.orcon.net.nz ([60.234.4.44]:55469)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <psainty@HIDDEN>) id 1mBd9p-0005Dk-JG
for 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 09:11:34 -0400
Received: from [10.253.37.70] (port=62456 helo=webmail.orcon.net.nz)
by smtp-3.orcon.net.nz with esmtpa (Exim 4.90_1)
(envelope-from <psainty@HIDDEN>)
id 1mBd9j-0000Lw-5n; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 01:11:27 +1200
Received: from ip-116-251-162-85.kinect.net.nz ([116.251.162.85])
via [10.253.37.253] by webmail.orcon.net.nz
with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Fri, 06 Aug 2021 01:11:27 +1200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 01:11:27 +1200
From: Phil Sainty <psainty@HIDDEN>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#49855: Problem with GNU ELPA build of :core package (Re:
[GNU ELPA] So-Long version 1.1)
In-Reply-To: <jwv8s1gu9ls.fsf-monnier+emacs@HIDDEN>
References: <85czqu2qdw.fsf@HIDDEN>
<2d94e1d983f91e0322747a86e7a6bcc9@HIDDEN>
<db34044390d56621d0ed43b6abd838c7@HIDDEN>
<87czqteik6.fsf@HIDDEN>
<532c06a4ff892539bc35868acd2fa0d6@HIDDEN>
<jwv8s1gu9ls.fsf-monnier+emacs@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <516b0a129400626e4c99a48f64f10129@HIDDEN>
X-Sender: psainty@HIDDEN
User-Agent: Orcon Webmail
X-GeoIP: --
X-Spam_score: -2.9
X-Spam_score_int: -28
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49855
Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>, 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)
On 2021-08-05 10:33, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> Do you think you can come up with a patch against `elpa-admin.el`
> doing that?
Yes, I think I can take a stab at that.
My initial foray has raised one item of potential interest:
Git 2.22 Release Notes
======================
* "git log -L<from>,<to>:<path>" with "-s" did not suppress the patch
output as it should. This has been corrected.
(merge 05314efaea jk/line-log-with-patch later to maint).
I don't know whether there's any reason to support older git
versions, but I'm using git 2.17.1 and so the command generated
by `elpaa--get-release-revision' gives me this:
$ git log -n1 --no-patch --pretty=format:%H -L '/^;;*
*\(Package-\)\?Version:/,+1:lisp/so-long.el'
b84986af52d4e9debace2850a5ec106f51e38e61
diff --git a/lisp/so-long.el b/lisp/so-long.el
--- a/lisp/so-long.el
+++ b/lisp/so-long.el
@@ -11,1 +11,1 @@
-;; Version: 1.1
+;; Version: 1.1.1
I didn't twig initially that I wasn't seeing the intended
output, and spent a while fruitlessly wondering where in the
elisp that got trimmed down to a single line...
-Phil
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#49855; Package emacs.
Full text available.
Received: (at 49855) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2021 22:33:29 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Aug 04 18:33:28 2021
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45356 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1mBPS4-0004Po-NF
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 18:33:28 -0400
Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:2003)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <monnier@HIDDEN>) id 1mBPS3-0004Pc-1w
for 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 18:33:27 -0400
Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D350180AA9;
Wed, 4 Aug 2021 18:33:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1])
by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7A6E180533;
Wed, 4 Aug 2021 18:33:19 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca;
s=mail; t=1628116399;
bh=j94lZsdg728SxoJ0EAcHFmBaEqzF5G0i35a9r4RRe/Q=;
h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From;
b=Fca0FMsXmYVBgRCEc0nqr1RVDbtMu2obs/g+BW/QJoECyASsOuBdhsXF8KqvsCz+j
0JemsJBs4OXAhi9WimnG+kHSOW2Ef0C972N0jbYqPePjFlg1+NbOVux5R13cGfxjWr
cyZRKR7aaTrKHAwsnRvcFVA1CYG69gw7zQ6KVMOrwKjakd4b/H87cv9PaNoaz7GTEd
hD6+NS8wxNOeL0beaLY1EyFIdBf+zroHaaUSCl8bWyDfPWVfxfC5uLfSlie+AURjqL
1f2xBFnxXUVCOO6b3x4+YYFK+cxF4P6SRGrEQMRqGQ0rTZT4csMI7rjrYZah6RTw8Y
rI5thUWeoWYZg==
Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.29.138])
by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49FA812039B;
Wed, 4 Aug 2021 18:33:19 -0400 (EDT)
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
To: Phil Sainty <psainty@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#49855: Problem with GNU ELPA build of :core package (Re:
[GNU ELPA] So-Long version 1.1)
Message-ID: <jwv8s1gu9ls.fsf-monnier+emacs@HIDDEN>
References: <85czqu2qdw.fsf@HIDDEN>
<2d94e1d983f91e0322747a86e7a6bcc9@HIDDEN>
<db34044390d56621d0ed43b6abd838c7@HIDDEN>
<87czqteik6.fsf@HIDDEN>
<532c06a4ff892539bc35868acd2fa0d6@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 18:33:18 -0400
In-Reply-To: <532c06a4ff892539bc35868acd2fa0d6@HIDDEN> (Phil
Sainty's message of "Thu, 05 Aug 2021 00:31:20 +1200")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-SPAM-INFO: Spam detection results: 0
ALL_TRUSTED -1 Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
AWL -0.093 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
domain
X-SPAM-LEVEL:
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49855
Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>, 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)
> If in addition to that information, it also showed the commit hash and
> message which was used to build the release, I would have immediately
> seen that I'd messed up. Something like:
>
>> Build details:
>> Commit 359a8e4eda047b7dcb7e64faff7f8eaacf5d937c
>> ; * lisp/so-long.el: Bump to version 1.1
Makes sense and sounds good.
> I'm not sure whether it's appropriate to include such details in that
> particular notification, or if it would be better to send a separate
> message to the maintainer;
I think we can keep it as a single message.
We could add something giving the commit id, the date of the commit
(personally, commit ids don't speak to me, but the commit date
might tip me off), and the first line of the commit message.
Seems short enough that it can fit before the NEWS without bothering
those readers who don't care about it.
Do you think you can come up with a patch against `elpa-admin.el`
doing that?
Stefan
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#49855; Package emacs.
Full text available.Received: (at 49855) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2021 22:24:06 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Aug 04 18:24:06 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45350 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1mBPIz-0004AY-QB for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 18:24:05 -0400 Received: from smtp-3.orcon.net.nz ([60.234.4.44]:34111) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <psainty@HIDDEN>) id 1mBPIy-0004AQ-9u for 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 18:24:04 -0400 Received: from [10.253.37.70] (port=43844 helo=webmail.orcon.net.nz) by smtp-3.orcon.net.nz with esmtpa (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <psainty@HIDDEN>) id 1mBPIv-0002ps-8m; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 10:24:01 +1200 Received: from ip-116-251-162-85.kinect.net.nz ([116.251.162.85]) via [10.253.37.253] by webmail.orcon.net.nz with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Thu, 05 Aug 2021 10:24:00 +1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 10:24:00 +1200 From: Phil Sainty <psainty@HIDDEN> To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#49855: Problem with GNU ELPA build of :core package (Re: [GNU ELPA] So-Long version 1.1) In-Reply-To: <532c06a4ff892539bc35868acd2fa0d6@HIDDEN> References: <85czqu2qdw.fsf@HIDDEN> <2d94e1d983f91e0322747a86e7a6bcc9@HIDDEN> <db34044390d56621d0ed43b6abd838c7@HIDDEN> <87czqteik6.fsf@HIDDEN> <532c06a4ff892539bc35868acd2fa0d6@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <8fd9cea58be3da60b914590d7e3af17e@HIDDEN> X-Sender: psainty@HIDDEN User-Agent: Orcon Webmail X-GeoIP: -- X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49855 Cc: 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@HIDDEN X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On 2021-08-05 00:31, Phil Sainty wrote: > At present I'm sent this: >> Subject: [GNU ELPA] So-Long version 1.1.1 Please pretend that I'd shown the 1.1 notification message there, rather than 1.1.1, so that the rest of that email makes better sense :)
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#49855; Package emacs.
Full text available.Received: (at 49855) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2021 12:31:26 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Aug 04 08:31:26 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43068 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1mBG3S-0003HM-7X for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 08:31:26 -0400 Received: from smtp-4.orcon.net.nz ([60.234.4.59]:60005) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <psainty@HIDDEN>) id 1mBG3Q-0003HA-CB for 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 08:31:25 -0400 Received: from [10.253.37.70] (port=46283 helo=webmail.orcon.net.nz) by smtp-4.orcon.net.nz with esmtpa (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <psainty@HIDDEN>) id 1mBG3M-0004KZ-7v; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 00:31:21 +1200 Received: from ip-116-251-162-85.kinect.net.nz ([116.251.162.85]) via [10.253.37.253] by webmail.orcon.net.nz with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Thu, 05 Aug 2021 00:31:20 +1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 00:31:20 +1200 From: Phil Sainty <psainty@HIDDEN> To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#49855: Problem with GNU ELPA build of :core package (Re: [GNU ELPA] So-Long version 1.1) In-Reply-To: <87czqteik6.fsf@HIDDEN> References: <85czqu2qdw.fsf@HIDDEN> <2d94e1d983f91e0322747a86e7a6bcc9@HIDDEN> <db34044390d56621d0ed43b6abd838c7@HIDDEN> <87czqteik6.fsf@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <532c06a4ff892539bc35868acd2fa0d6@HIDDEN> X-Sender: psainty@HIDDEN User-Agent: Orcon Webmail X-GeoIP: -- X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49855 Cc: 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@HIDDEN X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On 2021-08-04 20:10, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > I don't really think there's any way to determine the intention here. > The developer may be working in a branch, fix something, bump the > number, fix some more (but doesn't want that to land in ELPA yet), and > then merge, for instance. I guess so. It seems a less-likely workflow to my mind, but that may just be my own habits and biases talking. Still, it would be good if we could at least reduce the chances of people getting tripped up by this. Taking a different tack, perhaps we just need a more detailed (or an additional) notification email. At present I'm sent this: > Subject: [GNU ELPA] So-Long version 1.1.1 > From: ELPA update <do.not.reply@HIDDEN> > To: gnu-emacs-sources@HIDDEN > Cc: Phil Sainty <psainty@HIDDEN> > Reply-To: help-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN > > Version 1.1.1 of package So-Long has just been released in GNU ELPA. > You can now find it in M-x package-list RET. > > So-Long describes itself as: > Say farewell to performance problems with minified code. > > More at https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/so-long.html If in addition to that information, it also showed the commit hash and message which was used to build the release, I would have immediately seen that I'd messed up. Something like: > Build details: > Commit 359a8e4eda047b7dcb7e64faff7f8eaacf5d937c > ; * lisp/so-long.el: Bump to version 1.1 I'm not sure whether it's appropriate to include such details in that particular notification, or if it would be better to send a separate message to the maintainer; but either way these details would provide direct confirmation as to whether the thing you thought had happened had actually happened. As it was, I thought I'd released "version 1.1", and the notification told me that I'd done exactly that, and so I was completely confident that everything was correct until I found that it wasn't. I suspect that if I hadn't done a sanity-check then I might not realised anything was wrong until someone else told me. -Phil
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#49855; Package emacs.
Full text available.Received: (at 49855) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2021 08:11:08 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Aug 04 04:11:07 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42614 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1mBBzX-0000L1-GN for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 04:11:07 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:38016) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1mBBzQ-0000KP-2e for 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 04:11:06 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=AD2VRgtjAeRb1YI6laS3DcNTX1b/nqRhJzQlnoKGDIk=; b=tLE7b7pftoZ4GozLnnPAXUkY8g tvVKog3MSau7tHsjQSgDlBK7IYTYlGzEtZDFYogARV4rcnK69D9jrf7oe9aoc+2LP+GiZc6Cb2xcA oc+gdv1cP9Bif/QEnUHBrbsL1/qp7wD6BFQQ6362FF4gCDBu0kiV9/B8QAvjKYE8nmPY=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1mBBzF-0005VK-OK; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 10:10:52 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> To: Phil Sainty <psainty@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#49855: Problem with GNU ELPA build of :core package (Re: [GNU ELPA] So-Long version 1.1) References: <85czqu2qdw.fsf@HIDDEN> <2d94e1d983f91e0322747a86e7a6bcc9@HIDDEN> <db34044390d56621d0ed43b6abd838c7@HIDDEN> Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 10:10:49 +0200 In-Reply-To: <db34044390d56621d0ed43b6abd838c7@HIDDEN> (Phil Sainty's message of "Wed, 04 Aug 2021 12:39:33 +1200") Message-ID: <87czqteik6.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Phil Sainty <psainty@HIDDEN> writes: > I do understand that it's useful to be able to push changes > without changing the version on ELPA, so that you only create > a new release at the time you intend to, so I'm not asking for > every c [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49855 Cc: 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@HIDDEN X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Phil Sainty <psainty@HIDDEN> writes: > I do understand that it's useful to be able to push changes > without changing the version on ELPA, so that you only create > a new release at the time you intend to, so I'm not asking for > every commit to create a new build; just wondering whether it's > possible to account for the branch merge scenario, where the > merge commit was intended to be the version bump commit. I don't really think there's any way to determine the intention here. The developer may be working in a branch, fix something, bump the number, fix some more (but doesn't want that to land in ELPA yet), and then merge, for instance. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#49855; Package emacs.
Full text available.
Received: (at 49855) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2021 03:24:09 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 03 23:24:09 2021
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42065 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1mB7Vp-0006zY-4r
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 23:24:09 -0400
Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:13399)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <monnier@HIDDEN>) id 1mB7Vm-0006z1-RK
for 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 23:24:07 -0400
Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id ACEC61001F3;
Tue, 3 Aug 2021 23:24:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1])
by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 57854100006;
Tue, 3 Aug 2021 23:23:58 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca;
s=mail; t=1628047438;
bh=zJzbWHaXXMVyia6mCY1hj6KzjGwCBeX9sG0tiRs4m3Q=;
h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From;
b=ZaPl+OPoo5ChDA1ekBgpgQV8GpMPKgqRGPrlOKGBJM/DS6/CqZM39Mc5zpWT4elw+
4iQ+c7T/4nZ4osgDvd085w+exwxdS9uowQVzKynFm7rifX1Ici53ogs44GBlAn3X55
tZfjmfvdfnq6DbxrTYmwSA4aG1jDItEV8qmF8metxfZDdShwKXRZGhRGbbPGf5ESip
fjNt9lweqGo5o5rFHNrqouLGC6IeevI/TrLAbIlSpPikWoK8BEjqsmuTn9N1SzXYFb
rqexgg0+bBJVFtYaSECuY4hcrRThjECvb8sUkCoPezTnB1p8U32KHX7fPTWEm8Vwgr
nV6y4zRiaB68A==
Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.29.138])
by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 348DD1201C9;
Tue, 3 Aug 2021 23:23:58 -0400 (EDT)
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
To: Phil Sainty <psainty@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#49855: Problem with GNU ELPA build of :core package (Re:
[GNU ELPA] So-Long version 1.1)
Message-ID: <jwvo8adx5fx.fsf-monnier+emacs@HIDDEN>
References: <85czqu2qdw.fsf@HIDDEN>
<2d94e1d983f91e0322747a86e7a6bcc9@HIDDEN>
<db34044390d56621d0ed43b6abd838c7@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2021 23:23:51 -0400
In-Reply-To: <db34044390d56621d0ed43b6abd838c7@HIDDEN> (Phil
Sainty's message of "Wed, 04 Aug 2021 12:39:33 +1200")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-SPAM-INFO: Spam detection results: 0
ALL_TRUSTED -1 Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
AWL -0.094 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
domain
X-SPAM-LEVEL:
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49855
Cc: 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)
> That didn't gel very well with my workflow (which was to bump
> the version before adding new functionality, and then add the
> new features (associating each one with the new version as I
> went), and finally merge the branch for the completed release).
What I can suggest in that case is to do:
1- bump the version from `AA.BB` to `CC.DD-git`
2- hack hack hack
3- when done, bump the version from `CC.DD-git` to `CC.DD`
Stefan
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#49855; Package emacs.
Full text available.Received: (at 49855) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2021 00:59:34 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 03 20:59:34 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41862 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1mB5Ft-0007ah-RP for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 20:59:34 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f50.google.com ([209.85.128.50]:36659) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <contovob@HIDDEN>) id 1mB5Fr-0007aU-0s for 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 20:59:32 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f50.google.com with SMTP id o7-20020a05600c5107b0290257f956e02dso2837229wms.1 for <49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 17:59:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tcd.ie; s=google21; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=udxUMjj4BVXJ3IxT/NWZBDLueNOTB12QUqrAe0hNeHg=; b=VPEiCLa0CoDR9KCTwyd6onhDOy0qfg4UIy4Hxfw/pAtEl/eeTGaCjZXAXO/UF9RTqe jxr86ugY/0JIfkjUAAxnxtfgAUQYqEHSJ43DYRZB4RRgrF/mkX9yolXxQPMAijByZsH+ B33iYqgL4pgjTpViS3dM+AcPcfOinl2MGOOQjwKKpH/t5nYVC+TrZNW6QRln9ksK1vGo qx/OANkfj8TChkUkSuFeKcIsaShlZdgrLeCyGDjBProLti8nrE1N7QM5sbgC/MtRlG79 utWJsOWfjmNikeFqpbFp9V8d/girCvYoBJl6MPwwjzCKfGnMzowUkX5kgKsPY8L7sMHP 5BSQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=udxUMjj4BVXJ3IxT/NWZBDLueNOTB12QUqrAe0hNeHg=; b=LYrFFWgDxILzBzy4N0cUKPAfZTOJtMG2H3OCU3WbYx3xneikrE4N33pNyCwB/vxobY YxYI97akwdfMZRmxEeK7N/vYVNU/usAkn2wSTcKrK4TF1jUgiJqOfk/H2ZSJGKcs13St JhTXsQVUAuv55evQb5+pkrVCFhvumSte2dczQ45hxB+3e7RLvuSIL1Qwal2/LboWozGA InA0qPAbavWPyW6g/R5DNMOsvnsPrEJ49qg0MTGcr5cGoIYy5QmwWF7IxXwdBMvp+G60 8LE8iaQd7SyV3Ws2iojQrxAQU7lF3sDhDraycB63SXpm4bLX8T+VGCaRlhkET9ZDSLPc Z1BQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532UwIN8sUFvSZe0lMN9rI3ulagh6KL3SsYb2enIuwweHbf6cTA3 SuC9OYMZVX8TfAgF+FExXxkf5A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwC+1jj+tNNZFpzeQ7zZzKAbup2swDOLa3gwYT3yi5CfQGaj10V4QCn1+Q2Kvhix8BXNfWLsQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:cc:: with SMTP id u12mr24385621wmm.63.1628038765115; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 17:59:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a02:8084:20e2:c380:d15:339e:aa10:60f1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x12sm507850wrt.35.2021.08.03.17.59.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 03 Aug 2021 17:59:24 -0700 (PDT) From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob@HIDDEN> To: Phil Sainty <psainty@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#49855: Problem with GNU ELPA build of :core package (Re: [GNU ELPA] So-Long version 1.1) References: <85czqu2qdw.fsf@HIDDEN> <2d94e1d983f91e0322747a86e7a6bcc9@HIDDEN> <db34044390d56621d0ed43b6abd838c7@HIDDEN> Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 01:59:23 +0100 In-Reply-To: <db34044390d56621d0ed43b6abd838c7@HIDDEN> (Phil Sainty's message of "Wed, 04 Aug 2021 12:39:33 +1200") Message-ID: <87wnp2kot0.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49855 Cc: 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@HIDDEN X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Phil Sainty <psainty@HIDDEN> writes: > On 2021-08-04 12:17, Phil Sainty wrote: >> Could someone (Stefan?) fix the ELPA version, and see if you can >> figure out what went awry here? > > I now see that it specifically used the commit in which the > version number changed, and ignored everything which followed, > so I understand what happened now. > > That didn't gel very well with my workflow (which was to bump > the version before adding new functionality, and then add the > new features (associating each one with the new version as I > went), and finally merge the branch for the completed release). > > I'm not sure if ELPA could be made to recognise that scenario, > or if I'll need to ensure that the final commit always includes > a version bump. > > I do understand that it's useful to be able to push changes > without changing the version on ELPA, so that you only create > a new release at the time you intend to, so I'm not asking for > every commit to create a new build; just wondering whether it's > possible to account for the branch merge scenario, where the > merge commit was intended to be the version bump commit. IIUC, something similar was brought up earlier this year: https://lists.gnu.org/r/emacs-devel/2021-03/msg00490.html Thanks, -- Basil
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#49855; Package emacs.
Full text available.Received: (at 49855) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2021 00:39:37 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 03 20:39:36 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41839 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1mB4wa-0004yN-M7 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 20:39:36 -0400 Received: from smtp-4.orcon.net.nz ([60.234.4.59]:48923) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <psainty@HIDDEN>) id 1mB4wY-0004yF-Sw for 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 20:39:35 -0400 Received: from [10.253.37.70] (port=41543 helo=webmail.orcon.net.nz) by smtp-4.orcon.net.nz with esmtpa (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <psainty@HIDDEN>) id 1mB4wX-0006q0-9E; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 12:39:33 +1200 Received: from ip-116-251-162-85.kinect.net.nz ([116.251.162.85]) via [10.253.37.253] by webmail.orcon.net.nz with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Wed, 04 Aug 2021 12:39:33 +1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 12:39:33 +1200 From: Phil Sainty <psainty@HIDDEN> To: 49855 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#49855: Problem with GNU ELPA build of :core package (Re: [GNU ELPA] So-Long version 1.1) In-Reply-To: <2d94e1d983f91e0322747a86e7a6bcc9@HIDDEN> References: <85czqu2qdw.fsf@HIDDEN> <2d94e1d983f91e0322747a86e7a6bcc9@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <db34044390d56621d0ed43b6abd838c7@HIDDEN> X-Sender: psainty@HIDDEN User-Agent: Orcon Webmail X-GeoIP: -- X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49855 Cc: monnier@HIDDEN X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On 2021-08-04 12:17, Phil Sainty wrote: > Could someone (Stefan?) fix the ELPA version, and see if you can > figure out what went awry here? I now see that it specifically used the commit in which the version number changed, and ignored everything which followed, so I understand what happened now. That didn't gel very well with my workflow (which was to bump the version before adding new functionality, and then add the new features (associating each one with the new version as I went), and finally merge the branch for the completed release). I'm not sure if ELPA could be made to recognise that scenario, or if I'll need to ensure that the final commit always includes a version bump. I do understand that it's useful to be able to push changes without changing the version on ELPA, so that you only create a new release at the time you intend to, so I'm not asking for every commit to create a new build; just wondering whether it's possible to account for the branch merge scenario, where the merge commit was intended to be the version bump commit. In the meantime I guess I should commit this change to the Emacs master branch? -;; Version: 1.1 +;; Version: 1.1.1 -Phil
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#49855; Package emacs.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2021 00:17:33 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 03 20:17:33 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41817 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1mB4bE-0004RH-Qu for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 20:17:33 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:48852) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <psainty@HIDDEN>) id 1mB4bE-0004RA-0t for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 20:17:32 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49586) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <psainty@HIDDEN>) id 1mB4bD-0008Mn-Nx for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 20:17:31 -0400 Received: from smtp-3.orcon.net.nz ([60.234.4.44]:55295) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <psainty@HIDDEN>) id 1mB4bA-0005Jb-Sl for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 20:17:31 -0400 Received: from [10.253.37.70] (port=56886 helo=webmail.orcon.net.nz) by smtp-3.orcon.net.nz with esmtpa (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <psainty@HIDDEN>) id 1mB4b6-0006Bv-AH; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 12:17:24 +1200 Received: from ip-116-251-162-85.kinect.net.nz ([116.251.162.85]) via [10.253.37.253] by webmail.orcon.net.nz with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Wed, 04 Aug 2021 12:17:23 +1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 12:17:23 +1200 From: Phil Sainty <psainty@HIDDEN> To: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN Subject: Problem with GNU ELPA build of :core package (Re: [GNU ELPA] So-Long version 1.1) In-Reply-To: <85czqu2qdw.fsf@HIDDEN> References: <85czqu2qdw.fsf@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <2d94e1d983f91e0322747a86e7a6bcc9@HIDDEN> X-Sender: psainty@HIDDEN User-Agent: Orcon Webmail X-GeoIP: -- Received-SPF: pass client-ip=60.234.4.44; envelope-from=psainty@HIDDEN; helo=smtp-3.orcon.net.nz X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: monnier@HIDDEN X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) Yesterday I merged[1] so-long v1.1 to the Emacs master branch, and per the GNU ELPA config[2] I subsequently got a notification email to say that v1.1 was now on ELPA too; but I've noticed that the ELPA version is wrong -- the tar file provided at the ELPA page[3] does not contain the same version that is in Emacs. It looks like it's taken one of the new commits and made a build from that, but it's not the revision from the merge, so it's missing many of the changes. [1] https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=3a56d4eea93e2fe832021a0685e2d9fe5bbd034b [2] https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/elpa.git/tree/elpa-packages?id=06e26055b3377#n346 [3] https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/so-long.html Could someone (Stefan?) fix the ELPA version, and see if you can figure out what went awry here? I suppose the version may need a bump in case anyone has installed this already. Preferably something like 1.1.1 rather than 1.2. -Phil On 2021-08-04 09:02, ELPA update wrote: > Version 1.1 of package So-Long has just been released in GNU ELPA. > You can now find it in M-x package-list RET. > > So-Long describes itself as: > Say farewell to performance problems with minified code. > > More at https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/so-long.html
Phil Sainty <psainty@HIDDEN>:bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN.
Full text available.bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#49855; Package emacs.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.