GNU logs - #56289, boring messages

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#56289: "guix shell -f guix2.scm" fails always
Resent-From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 20:48:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.56289.B.165644926312203 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 56289 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Message-ID: <f4cf2cbe3d6648bfd192d449475332f4d413d67b.camel@HIDDEN>
From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 22:47:29 +0200
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-JRmepqpAPXB51rnZfaN9"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.3-1 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:1800:120:4::f00:13;
 envelope-from=maximedevos@HIDDEN; helo=baptiste.telenet-ops.be
X-Spam_score_int: -27
X-Spam_score: -2.8
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)


--=-JRmepqpAPXB51rnZfaN9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Put the folllowing in "oops-guix.scm":

(use-modules (gnu packages))
(specifications->packages '("hello"))

then do: "guix shell -f oops-guix.scm" to make an environment
with "hello".  I get:

> guix shell: warning: no packages specified; creating an empty environment
$ which hello
> /home/regulator/.guix-profile/bin/hello # <-- not from the new environmen=
t!

Or even simpler: do "guix shell -f non-existing-file.scm":
> guix shell: warning: no packages specified; creating an empty environment

Looks like "-f" is ignored entirely?

Version information:
$ guix --version
guix (GNU Guix) 0

(Didn't there use to be a commit?  Is confirmed on #guix as
reproducible ...)

Greetings,
Maxime.


--=-JRmepqpAPXB51rnZfaN9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iI0EABYKADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYrto4RccbWF4aW1lZGV2
b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7vPQAQCt+X11kjsi1+l3E0l9KKA0kByc
2lgkTinhktYTA67phQD+PrdR1NA26wfsdvibSuL4vtdBklvC2z3PwScfKAU05Ag=
=bsAt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-JRmepqpAPXB51rnZfaN9--

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#56289: Acknowledgement ("guix shell -f guix2.scm" fails always)
Message-ID: <handler.56289.B.165644926312203.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <f4cf2cbe3d6648bfd192d449475332f4d413d67b.camel@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 56289
X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix
Reply-To: 56289 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 20:48:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-guix@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 56289 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
56289: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D56289
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#56289: "guix shell -f guix2.scm" fails always
Resent-From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 06:20:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.56289.B56289.165648357528259 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN>, 56289 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Message-ID: <2df655ef071dd057655ebf6a87335148c6cd64e7.camel@HIDDEN>
From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 08:19:30 +0200
In-Reply-To: <f4cf2cbe3d6648bfd192d449475332f4d413d67b.camel@HIDDEN>
References: <f4cf2cbe3d6648bfd192d449475332f4d413d67b.camel@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.42.1 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

Am Dienstag, dem 28.06.2022 um 22:47 +0200 schrieb Maxime Devos:
> Put the folllowing in "oops-guix.scm":
> 
> (use-modules (gnu packages))
> (specifications->packages '("hello"))
> 
> then do: "guix shell -f oops-guix.scm" to make an environment
> with "hello".  I get:
> 
> > guix shell: warning: no packages specified; creating an empty
> > environment
> $ which hello
> > /home/regulator/.guix-profile/bin/hello # <-- not from the new
> > environment!
> 
> Or even simpler: do "guix shell -f non-existing-file.scm":
> > guix shell: warning: no packages specified; creating an empty
> > environment
> 
> Looks like "-f" is ignored entirely?
Have you tried specifying a file that actually contains a package (not
a manifest)?  That being said, the error reporting could be better :)

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#56289: "guix shell -f guix2.scm" fails always
Resent-From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 09:11:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.56289.B56289.165649384613287 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>,  56289 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Message-ID: <cfdd155d4c1cfffcfb6344aa7d27b2a15aba84e4.camel@HIDDEN>
From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 11:10:32 +0200
In-Reply-To: <2df655ef071dd057655ebf6a87335148c6cd64e7.camel@HIDDEN>
References: <f4cf2cbe3d6648bfd192d449475332f4d413d67b.camel@HIDDEN>
 <2df655ef071dd057655ebf6a87335148c6cd64e7.camel@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-PwdapmM9U4szm9OlolwS"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.3-1 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>


--=-PwdapmM9U4szm9OlolwS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op wo 29-06-2022 om 08:19 [+0200]:
> > Looks like "-f" is ignored entirely?
> Have you tried specifying a file that actually contains a package
> (not
> a manifest)?

None of the examples contain a manifest, oops-guix.scm actually
contains a list of packages as mentioned previously (*). =C2=A0And the exac=
t
same thing happens if a package is used instead of a list of packages.

(*):

> > Put the folllowing in "oops-guix.scm":
> >=20
> > (use-modules (gnu packages))
> > (specifications->packages '("hello"))

Greetings,
Maxime.

--=-PwdapmM9U4szm9OlolwS
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iI0EABYKADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYrwXCBccbWF4aW1lZGV2
b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7uXVAQDqtDtcgRRBpV7Hxirk9Nqdhmnx
XBNBeJY97UTb/o0L2gD/WIODLIyBkEPB+zrnn0o1iDZHtlDjTIHQq6CyHUg/+QU=
=z9oK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-PwdapmM9U4szm9OlolwS--

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#56289: "guix shell -f guix2.scm" fails always
Resent-From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 09:24:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.56289.B56289.165649458714614 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 56289
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN>, 56289 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 56289-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B56289.165649458714614
          (code B ref 56289); Wed, 29 Jun 2022 09:24:02 +0000
Received: (at 56289) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jun 2022 09:23:07 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57392 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1o6Tud-0003ne-DE
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 05:23:07 -0400
Received: from mailrelay.tugraz.at ([129.27.2.202]:17295)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>) id 1o6TuX-0003mw-Hw
 for 56289 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 05:23:05 -0400
Received: from lprikler-laptop.ist.intra (gw.ist.tugraz.at [129.27.202.101])
 by mailrelay.tugraz.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4LXwwy2J0Yz1LZWB;
 Wed, 29 Jun 2022 11:22:58 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mailrelay.tugraz.at 4LXwwy2J0Yz1LZWB
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tugraz.at;
 s=mailrelay; t=1656494578;
 bh=1aZCKJdWmoJiHzWHrTCQUg8NI8O+EcHgT53B/qtNLZo=;
 h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=hG1d1lx9gNPLMkXuY3e3xNO2ODjv8DYD9MW9q3Rl2nGS6Vs+2OwT09TEf8BGLB2XI
 g7FvleuJeu56c04GtpSXF/4lwq3Gf9b6J+zcOQ7lFM5kF8OTxxtem+JOmQ6Ri14REI
 4qbmbPVenNpY4srgg5j/DXBXPZJqhOKcfUVgoSpw=
Message-ID: <823572af8921c9b7b1468ace6d248eb5f4bbee68.camel@HIDDEN>
From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 11:22:57 +0200
In-Reply-To: <cfdd155d4c1cfffcfb6344aa7d27b2a15aba84e4.camel@HIDDEN>
References: <f4cf2cbe3d6648bfd192d449475332f4d413d67b.camel@HIDDEN>
 <2df655ef071dd057655ebf6a87335148c6cd64e7.camel@HIDDEN>
 <cfdd155d4c1cfffcfb6344aa7d27b2a15aba84e4.camel@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.42.1 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-TUG-Backscatter-control: waObeELIUl4ypBWmcn/8wQ
X-Spam-Scanner: SpamAssassin 3.003001 
X-Spam-Score-relay: -1.9
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 on 129.27.10.116
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Am Mittwoch, dem 29.06.2022 um 11:10 +0200 schrieb Maxime Devos:
> Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op wo 29-06-2022 om 08:19 [+0200]:
> > > Looks like "-f" is ignored entirely?
> > Have you tried specifying a file that actually contains a package
> > (not a manifest)?
> 
> None of the examples contain a manifest, oops-guix.scm actually
> contains a list of packages as mentioned previously (*).
My bad, I read that as specifications->manifest.  Note that for
specifications->package, you could simply specify hello on the command
line.

Having tested your file now, I can say that guix shell builds hello as
expected, whereas with specifications->manifest, it produces a lovely
backtrace (which is more or less what one ought to expect).

> And the exact same thing happens if a package is used instead of a
> list of packages.
One thing to check here is whether a cache might be interfering.  I
think it is an already known bug, that the file itself is not key in
the cache, which you can work around by specifying --rebuild-cache.

Cheers

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#56289: "guix shell -f guix2.scm" fails always
Resent-From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 09:41:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.56289.B56289.165649563316358 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 56289
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>,  56289 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 56289-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B56289.165649563316358
          (code B ref 56289); Wed, 29 Jun 2022 09:41:02 +0000
Received: (at 56289) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jun 2022 09:40:33 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57445 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1o6UBV-0004Fl-IK
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 05:40:33 -0400
Received: from michel.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.137.88]:53192)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <maximedevos@HIDDEN>) id 1o6UBP-0004FW-Vb
 for 56289 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 05:40:32 -0400
Received: from ptr-bvsjgyhxw7psv60dyze.18120a2.ip6.access.telenet.be
 ([IPv6:2a02:1811:8c09:9d00:3c5f:2eff:feb0:ba5a])
 by michel.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp
 id oxgS270044UW6Th06xgS6X; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 11:40:26 +0200
Message-ID: <0087a26483dcbfef0d922b04e75530cde057edc8.camel@HIDDEN>
From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 11:40:26 +0200
In-Reply-To: <823572af8921c9b7b1468ace6d248eb5f4bbee68.camel@HIDDEN>
References: <f4cf2cbe3d6648bfd192d449475332f4d413d67b.camel@HIDDEN>
 <2df655ef071dd057655ebf6a87335148c6cd64e7.camel@HIDDEN>
 <cfdd155d4c1cfffcfb6344aa7d27b2a15aba84e4.camel@HIDDEN>
 <823572af8921c9b7b1468ace6d248eb5f4bbee68.camel@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-wpd+vaHghyiuAULOP6Ji"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.3-1 
MIME-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telenet.be; s=r22;
 t=1656495626; bh=Tjv7lOJPpyBlFl6zmlsH8wI7BjRb1RWF7Sd8qws1Qv4=;
 h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References;
 b=DZGIJZkplK1/eRVas/OJDAXVcVbrZ4k6ZO+EihZX8twU3C/LbBgoUZEKEv6VbTiRT
 Tdf2aPdNIprEVwPshMu+r11GdnFS4kKMw+xXxYAc4I6NrN5jt7eQhN/apJbAMh8gOx
 w0vithmz2q6LXzNlhctSBytZ7yOdAHCn4MuWPJEK0qgUvIAQI8pR33jXFJtV3PACdG
 7dJH0z/qnpyR0b5XS4YBP+TlSXPiLUyBx5ksQagNwW2DOZLwP6upuTQJeXsRijFIWq
 Xq2sZzdRJUMxTZB03RM10LOBsMZLjQGmgff8BTeClmGvXK0jhZuIvZ5L32Ur/pbmG0
 DTy07iY84vW2Q==
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)


--=-wpd+vaHghyiuAULOP6Ji
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op wo 29-06-2022 om 11:22 [+0200]:
> > And the exact same thing happens if a package is used instead of a
> > list of packages.
> One thing to check here is whether a cache might be interfering.=C2=A0 I
> think it is an already known bug, that the file itself is not key in
> the cache, which you can work around by specifying --rebuild-cache.

Whatever non-existent file name I use, I don't get an error message but
the warning =E2=80=98guix shell: warning: no packages specified; creating a=
n
empty environment=E2=80=99, so this doesn't look like a cache issue to me.

However, if I do:

$ LANGUAGE=3Den_US guix shell --rebuild-cache -f nn-fefefefexistent.scm
guix shell: error: failed to load 'nn-fefefefexistent.scm': No such file or=
 directory

$ LANGUAGE=3Den_US guix shell --rebuild-cache -f nn-fefefefexistent.scm
guix shell: error: failed to load 'nn-fefefefexistent.scm': No such file or=
 directory

$ LANGUAGE=3Den_US guix shell --rebuild-cache -f mm-fefefefexistent.scm=20
guix shell: error: failed to load 'mm-fefefefexistent.scm': No such file or=
 directory

$ LANGUAGE=3Den_US guix shell -f mm-fefefefexistent.scm
guix shell: error: failed to load 'mm-fefefefexistent.scm': No such file or=
 directory

so looks like there's a cache issue!

Greetings,
Maxime.


 *=20

--=-wpd+vaHghyiuAULOP6Ji
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iI0EABYKADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYrweChccbWF4aW1lZGV2
b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7h65AQD+vw7G3TZgFkEye6Scid8gsZZP
pyvSJBVOCijyiTJH/wD/ewnoHvc5SMWZfP0xriumxYuUw6+69W6UZsC6Ph5d6gI=
=y/mv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-wpd+vaHghyiuAULOP6Ji--

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#56289: "guix shell -f guix2.scm" fails always
Resent-From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 09:50:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.56289.B56289.165649615017275 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 56289
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN>, 56289 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 56289-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B56289.165649615017275
          (code B ref 56289); Wed, 29 Jun 2022 09:50:02 +0000
Received: (at 56289) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jun 2022 09:49:10 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57452 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1o6UJq-0004UZ-F6
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 05:49:10 -0400
Received: from mailrelay.tugraz.at ([129.27.2.202]:35025)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>) id 1o6UJn-0004UO-PB
 for 56289 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 05:49:09 -0400
Received: from lprikler-laptop.ist.intra (gw.ist.tugraz.at [129.27.202.101])
 by mailrelay.tugraz.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4LXxW36jxCz3wD0;
 Wed, 29 Jun 2022 11:49:03 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tugraz.at;
 s=mailrelay; t=1656496144;
 bh=sTXr/f5f2FjSUZrNTjCnT5o9HD4Omkr35EmKR4KldM0=;
 h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References;
 b=FamPvHa8GEIlnlwcS1eexSPU1Y5JdYK0I/kPBsfZYs7BIkmxH+L2ORv1xr/IzUn4v
 a5yDQ37ie2xrmK23q9IGVH0+cGV+pq3HPSIPsFzB6xZJ0lfPT8g9Q8s5q7QBVERrpz
 /o3ARrHTQIyy0LgJKXa074urPt33uIRYX3pUA9jg=
Message-ID: <19b8d259a397c514fce0be7a850138c9a64a2cef.camel@HIDDEN>
From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 11:49:03 +0200
In-Reply-To: <0087a26483dcbfef0d922b04e75530cde057edc8.camel@HIDDEN>
References: <f4cf2cbe3d6648bfd192d449475332f4d413d67b.camel@HIDDEN>
 <2df655ef071dd057655ebf6a87335148c6cd64e7.camel@HIDDEN>
 <cfdd155d4c1cfffcfb6344aa7d27b2a15aba84e4.camel@HIDDEN>
 <823572af8921c9b7b1468ace6d248eb5f4bbee68.camel@HIDDEN>
 <0087a26483dcbfef0d922b04e75530cde057edc8.camel@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.42.1 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-TUG-Backscatter-control: waObeELIUl4ypBWmcn/8wQ
X-Spam-Scanner: SpamAssassin 3.003001 
X-Spam-Score-relay: -1.9
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 on 129.27.10.117
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Am Mittwoch, dem 29.06.2022 um 11:40 +0200 schrieb Maxime Devos:
> Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op wo 29-06-2022 om 11:22 [+0200]:
> > > And the exact same thing happens if a package is used instead of
> > > a list of packages.
> > One thing to check here is whether a cache might be interfering.  I
> > think it is an already known bug, that the file itself is not key
> > in the cache, which you can work around by specifying --rebuild-
> > cache.
> 
> Whatever non-existent file name I use, I don't get an error message
> but the warning ‘guix shell: warning: no packages specified; creating
> an empty environment’, so this doesn't look like a cache issue to me.
That is exactly the cache issue, though.  Once ‘guix shell -f’
“succeeds” (even with an empty environment), subsequent invocations
lacking ‘--rebuild-cache’ ignore the file completely and serve from
cache.


Cheers

Last modified: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 10:00:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.