GNU bug report logs - #56289
"guix shell -f guix2.scm" fails always

Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.
Package: guix; Reported by: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN>; dated Tue, 28 Jun 2022 20:48:02 UTC; Maintainer for guix is bug-guix@HIDDEN.

Message received at 56289 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 56289) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jun 2022 09:49:10 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 29 05:49:10 2022
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57452 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1o6UJq-0004UZ-F6
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 05:49:10 -0400
Received: from mailrelay.tugraz.at ([129.27.2.202]:35025)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>) id 1o6UJn-0004UO-PB
 for 56289 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 05:49:09 -0400
Received: from lprikler-laptop.ist.intra (gw.ist.tugraz.at [129.27.202.101])
 by mailrelay.tugraz.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4LXxW36jxCz3wD0;
 Wed, 29 Jun 2022 11:49:03 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tugraz.at;
 s=mailrelay; t=1656496144;
 bh=sTXr/f5f2FjSUZrNTjCnT5o9HD4Omkr35EmKR4KldM0=;
 h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References;
 b=FamPvHa8GEIlnlwcS1eexSPU1Y5JdYK0I/kPBsfZYs7BIkmxH+L2ORv1xr/IzUn4v
 a5yDQ37ie2xrmK23q9IGVH0+cGV+pq3HPSIPsFzB6xZJ0lfPT8g9Q8s5q7QBVERrpz
 /o3ARrHTQIyy0LgJKXa074urPt33uIRYX3pUA9jg=
Message-ID: <19b8d259a397c514fce0be7a850138c9a64a2cef.camel@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: "guix shell -f guix2.scm" fails always
From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>
To: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN>, 56289 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 11:49:03 +0200
In-Reply-To: <0087a26483dcbfef0d922b04e75530cde057edc8.camel@HIDDEN>
References: <f4cf2cbe3d6648bfd192d449475332f4d413d67b.camel@HIDDEN>
 <2df655ef071dd057655ebf6a87335148c6cd64e7.camel@HIDDEN>
 <cfdd155d4c1cfffcfb6344aa7d27b2a15aba84e4.camel@HIDDEN>
 <823572af8921c9b7b1468ace6d248eb5f4bbee68.camel@HIDDEN>
 <0087a26483dcbfef0d922b04e75530cde057edc8.camel@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.42.1 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-TUG-Backscatter-control: waObeELIUl4ypBWmcn/8wQ
X-Spam-Scanner: SpamAssassin 3.003001 
X-Spam-Score-relay: -1.9
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 on 129.27.10.117
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 56289
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Am Mittwoch, dem 29.06.2022 um 11:40 +0200 schrieb Maxime Devos:
> Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op wo 29-06-2022 om 11:22 [+0200]:
> > > And the exact same thing happens if a package is used instead of
> > > a list of packages.
> > One thing to check here is whether a cache might be interfering.  I
> > think it is an already known bug, that the file itself is not key
> > in the cache, which you can work around by specifying --rebuild-
> > cache.
> 
> Whatever non-existent file name I use, I don't get an error message
> but the warning ‘guix shell: warning: no packages specified; creating
> an empty environment’, so this doesn't look like a cache issue to me.
That is exactly the cache issue, though.  Once ‘guix shell -f’
“succeeds” (even with an empty environment), subsequent invocations
lacking ‘--rebuild-cache’ ignore the file completely and serve from
cache.


Cheers
Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#56289; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 56289 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 56289) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jun 2022 09:40:33 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 29 05:40:33 2022
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57445 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1o6UBV-0004Fl-IK
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 05:40:33 -0400
Received: from michel.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.137.88]:53192)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <maximedevos@HIDDEN>) id 1o6UBP-0004FW-Vb
 for 56289 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 05:40:32 -0400
Received: from ptr-bvsjgyhxw7psv60dyze.18120a2.ip6.access.telenet.be
 ([IPv6:2a02:1811:8c09:9d00:3c5f:2eff:feb0:ba5a])
 by michel.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp
 id oxgS270044UW6Th06xgS6X; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 11:40:26 +0200
Message-ID: <0087a26483dcbfef0d922b04e75530cde057edc8.camel@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: "guix shell -f guix2.scm" fails always
From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN>
To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>, 
 56289 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 11:40:26 +0200
In-Reply-To: <823572af8921c9b7b1468ace6d248eb5f4bbee68.camel@HIDDEN>
References: <f4cf2cbe3d6648bfd192d449475332f4d413d67b.camel@HIDDEN>
 <2df655ef071dd057655ebf6a87335148c6cd64e7.camel@HIDDEN>
 <cfdd155d4c1cfffcfb6344aa7d27b2a15aba84e4.camel@HIDDEN>
 <823572af8921c9b7b1468ace6d248eb5f4bbee68.camel@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-wpd+vaHghyiuAULOP6Ji"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.3-1 
MIME-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telenet.be; s=r22;
 t=1656495626; bh=Tjv7lOJPpyBlFl6zmlsH8wI7BjRb1RWF7Sd8qws1Qv4=;
 h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References;
 b=DZGIJZkplK1/eRVas/OJDAXVcVbrZ4k6ZO+EihZX8twU3C/LbBgoUZEKEv6VbTiRT
 Tdf2aPdNIprEVwPshMu+r11GdnFS4kKMw+xXxYAc4I6NrN5jt7eQhN/apJbAMh8gOx
 w0vithmz2q6LXzNlhctSBytZ7yOdAHCn4MuWPJEK0qgUvIAQI8pR33jXFJtV3PACdG
 7dJH0z/qnpyR0b5XS4YBP+TlSXPiLUyBx5ksQagNwW2DOZLwP6upuTQJeXsRijFIWq
 Xq2sZzdRJUMxTZB03RM10LOBsMZLjQGmgff8BTeClmGvXK0jhZuIvZ5L32Ur/pbmG0
 DTy07iY84vW2Q==
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 56289
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)


--=-wpd+vaHghyiuAULOP6Ji
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op wo 29-06-2022 om 11:22 [+0200]:
> > And the exact same thing happens if a package is used instead of a
> > list of packages.
> One thing to check here is whether a cache might be interfering.=C2=A0 I
> think it is an already known bug, that the file itself is not key in
> the cache, which you can work around by specifying --rebuild-cache.

Whatever non-existent file name I use, I don't get an error message but
the warning =E2=80=98guix shell: warning: no packages specified; creating a=
n
empty environment=E2=80=99, so this doesn't look like a cache issue to me.

However, if I do:

$ LANGUAGE=3Den_US guix shell --rebuild-cache -f nn-fefefefexistent.scm
guix shell: error: failed to load 'nn-fefefefexistent.scm': No such file or=
 directory

$ LANGUAGE=3Den_US guix shell --rebuild-cache -f nn-fefefefexistent.scm
guix shell: error: failed to load 'nn-fefefefexistent.scm': No such file or=
 directory

$ LANGUAGE=3Den_US guix shell --rebuild-cache -f mm-fefefefexistent.scm=20
guix shell: error: failed to load 'mm-fefefefexistent.scm': No such file or=
 directory

$ LANGUAGE=3Den_US guix shell -f mm-fefefefexistent.scm
guix shell: error: failed to load 'mm-fefefefexistent.scm': No such file or=
 directory

so looks like there's a cache issue!

Greetings,
Maxime.


 *=20

--=-wpd+vaHghyiuAULOP6Ji
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iI0EABYKADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYrweChccbWF4aW1lZGV2
b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7h65AQD+vw7G3TZgFkEye6Scid8gsZZP
pyvSJBVOCijyiTJH/wD/ewnoHvc5SMWZfP0xriumxYuUw6+69W6UZsC6Ph5d6gI=
=y/mv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-wpd+vaHghyiuAULOP6Ji--
Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#56289; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 56289 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 56289) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jun 2022 09:23:07 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 29 05:23:07 2022
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57392 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1o6Tud-0003ne-DE
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 05:23:07 -0400
Received: from mailrelay.tugraz.at ([129.27.2.202]:17295)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>) id 1o6TuX-0003mw-Hw
 for 56289 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 05:23:05 -0400
Received: from lprikler-laptop.ist.intra (gw.ist.tugraz.at [129.27.202.101])
 by mailrelay.tugraz.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4LXwwy2J0Yz1LZWB;
 Wed, 29 Jun 2022 11:22:58 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mailrelay.tugraz.at 4LXwwy2J0Yz1LZWB
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tugraz.at;
 s=mailrelay; t=1656494578;
 bh=1aZCKJdWmoJiHzWHrTCQUg8NI8O+EcHgT53B/qtNLZo=;
 h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=hG1d1lx9gNPLMkXuY3e3xNO2ODjv8DYD9MW9q3Rl2nGS6Vs+2OwT09TEf8BGLB2XI
 g7FvleuJeu56c04GtpSXF/4lwq3Gf9b6J+zcOQ7lFM5kF8OTxxtem+JOmQ6Ri14REI
 4qbmbPVenNpY4srgg5j/DXBXPZJqhOKcfUVgoSpw=
Message-ID: <823572af8921c9b7b1468ace6d248eb5f4bbee68.camel@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: "guix shell -f guix2.scm" fails always
From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>
To: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN>, 56289 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 11:22:57 +0200
In-Reply-To: <cfdd155d4c1cfffcfb6344aa7d27b2a15aba84e4.camel@HIDDEN>
References: <f4cf2cbe3d6648bfd192d449475332f4d413d67b.camel@HIDDEN>
 <2df655ef071dd057655ebf6a87335148c6cd64e7.camel@HIDDEN>
 <cfdd155d4c1cfffcfb6344aa7d27b2a15aba84e4.camel@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.42.1 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-TUG-Backscatter-control: waObeELIUl4ypBWmcn/8wQ
X-Spam-Scanner: SpamAssassin 3.003001 
X-Spam-Score-relay: -1.9
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 on 129.27.10.116
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 56289
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Am Mittwoch, dem 29.06.2022 um 11:10 +0200 schrieb Maxime Devos:
> Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op wo 29-06-2022 om 08:19 [+0200]:
> > > Looks like "-f" is ignored entirely?
> > Have you tried specifying a file that actually contains a package
> > (not a manifest)?
> 
> None of the examples contain a manifest, oops-guix.scm actually
> contains a list of packages as mentioned previously (*).
My bad, I read that as specifications->manifest.  Note that for
specifications->package, you could simply specify hello on the command
line.

Having tested your file now, I can say that guix shell builds hello as
expected, whereas with specifications->manifest, it produces a lovely
backtrace (which is more or less what one ought to expect).

> And the exact same thing happens if a package is used instead of a
> list of packages.
One thing to check here is whether a cache might be interfering.  I
think it is an already known bug, that the file itself is not key in
the cache, which you can work around by specifying --rebuild-cache.

Cheers
Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#56289; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 56289 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 56289) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jun 2022 09:10:46 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 29 05:10:46 2022
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57311 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1o6Tig-0003SF-0m
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 05:10:46 -0400
Received: from baptiste.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.132.51]:52918)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <maximedevos@HIDDEN>) id 1o6Tic-0003S4-Vm
 for 56289 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 05:10:45 -0400
Received: from ptr-bvsjgyhxw7psv60dyze.18120a2.ip6.access.telenet.be
 ([IPv6:2a02:1811:8c09:9d00:3c5f:2eff:feb0:ba5a])
 by baptiste.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp
 id oxAh270054UW6Th01xAhg0; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 11:10:41 +0200
Message-ID: <cfdd155d4c1cfffcfb6344aa7d27b2a15aba84e4.camel@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: "guix shell -f guix2.scm" fails always
From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN>
To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>, 
 56289 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 11:10:32 +0200
In-Reply-To: <2df655ef071dd057655ebf6a87335148c6cd64e7.camel@HIDDEN>
References: <f4cf2cbe3d6648bfd192d449475332f4d413d67b.camel@HIDDEN>
 <2df655ef071dd057655ebf6a87335148c6cd64e7.camel@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-PwdapmM9U4szm9OlolwS"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.3-1 
MIME-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telenet.be; s=r22;
 t=1656493841; bh=OryQjykNCJoy1hVS+YL0YrvAHtKNvpKFaCMaC4SL2b0=;
 h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References;
 b=Y6j5oMLMqUZd9wHvY4S9a8lknBCkrtKfgqOiL5kBXNhHCqwnxWWqwHhxgKz8E9Ha0
 z6VbVCcLVVPWLA74HIhJgu9jDx2abBnbqP63XlnLZp+RnDisBlpkIlrfQ98CGjWFYl
 vnWqa+WN9nK/PxBuVbmN9nr/Z1SJZV2fwqGVBshy9IoKpLhmfKUR8I9aR+v8Qx+lMv
 tJ2x4cSgoo6+v6Wl6d0b3FDAYC0T8JM9K8p5b77EYSi5JheO71J7a/q8GKA9fQG4H2
 hAR2M7YtdlQ7alY2E93Q7RG98ZgvkghSCuSRCiRBzZzlphTRe01+RkEW7EH+HSxKWS
 2aPzqbe4NCB1A==
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 56289
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)


--=-PwdapmM9U4szm9OlolwS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op wo 29-06-2022 om 08:19 [+0200]:
> > Looks like "-f" is ignored entirely?
> Have you tried specifying a file that actually contains a package
> (not
> a manifest)?

None of the examples contain a manifest, oops-guix.scm actually
contains a list of packages as mentioned previously (*). =C2=A0And the exac=
t
same thing happens if a package is used instead of a list of packages.

(*):

> > Put the folllowing in "oops-guix.scm":
> >=20
> > (use-modules (gnu packages))
> > (specifications->packages '("hello"))

Greetings,
Maxime.

--=-PwdapmM9U4szm9OlolwS
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iI0EABYKADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYrwXCBccbWF4aW1lZGV2
b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7uXVAQDqtDtcgRRBpV7Hxirk9Nqdhmnx
XBNBeJY97UTb/o0L2gD/WIODLIyBkEPB+zrnn0o1iDZHtlDjTIHQq6CyHUg/+QU=
=z9oK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-PwdapmM9U4szm9OlolwS--
Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#56289; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 56289 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 56289) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jun 2022 06:19:35 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 29 02:19:35 2022
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57018 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1o6R31-0007Lj-Ju
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 02:19:35 -0400
Received: from mailrelay.tugraz.at ([129.27.2.202]:51767)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>) id 1o6R2z-0007La-Vu
 for 56289 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 02:19:34 -0400
Received: from lprikler-laptop.ist.intra (gw.ist.tugraz.at [129.27.202.101])
 by mailrelay.tugraz.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4LXrsF66QSz1LZW9;
 Wed, 29 Jun 2022 08:19:29 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mailrelay.tugraz.at 4LXrsF66QSz1LZW9
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tugraz.at;
 s=mailrelay; t=1656483570;
 bh=L0jg3/ZW5ou0+jTb3dxOOSRwdIfcyayjvatjCTffADc=;
 h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=FYRL4CtNyZRyBN+ij23daBtgNuiXiFGw6BkZlEFWURjSL7gLi5EYCscJUFbivZUq6
 zMJmpG4PIxY/IOf65JrRHZ2kUXyB213BQECw3uhDJatVrYoCTkpZMICfboNVPoHppK
 LLApo097gmNzir2mf8esitDU7gF/3oCSMmRMjc+o=
Message-ID: <2df655ef071dd057655ebf6a87335148c6cd64e7.camel@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: "guix shell -f guix2.scm" fails always
From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>
To: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN>, 56289 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 08:19:30 +0200
In-Reply-To: <f4cf2cbe3d6648bfd192d449475332f4d413d67b.camel@HIDDEN>
References: <f4cf2cbe3d6648bfd192d449475332f4d413d67b.camel@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.42.1 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-TUG-Backscatter-control: waObeELIUl4ypBWmcn/8wQ
X-Spam-Scanner: SpamAssassin 3.003001 
X-Spam-Score-relay: -1.9
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 on 129.27.10.117
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 56289
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Am Dienstag, dem 28.06.2022 um 22:47 +0200 schrieb Maxime Devos:
> Put the folllowing in "oops-guix.scm":
> 
> (use-modules (gnu packages))
> (specifications->packages '("hello"))
> 
> then do: "guix shell -f oops-guix.scm" to make an environment
> with "hello".  I get:
> 
> > guix shell: warning: no packages specified; creating an empty
> > environment
> $ which hello
> > /home/regulator/.guix-profile/bin/hello # <-- not from the new
> > environment!
> 
> Or even simpler: do "guix shell -f non-existing-file.scm":
> > guix shell: warning: no packages specified; creating an empty
> > environment
> 
> Looks like "-f" is ignored entirely?
Have you tried specifying a file that actually contains a package (not
a manifest)?  That being said, the error reporting could be better :)
Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#56289; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jun 2022 20:47:43 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jun 28 16:47:43 2022
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56439 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1o6I7a-0003Ak-Q3
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 16:47:42 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:34542)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <maximedevos@HIDDEN>) id 1o6I7Y-0003AS-Vh
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 16:47:42 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36260)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <maximedevos@HIDDEN>)
 id 1o6I7Y-0007BF-ON
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 16:47:40 -0400
Received: from baptiste.telenet-ops.be ([2a02:1800:120:4::f00:13]:57466)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <maximedevos@HIDDEN>)
 id 1o6I7U-0004uK-Pg
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 16:47:40 -0400
Received: from ptr-bvsjgyhxw7psv60dyze.18120a2.ip6.access.telenet.be
 ([IPv6:2a02:1811:8c09:9d00:3c5f:2eff:feb0:ba5a])
 by baptiste.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp
 id oknZ2700G4UW6Th01knZFy; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 22:47:34 +0200
Message-ID: <f4cf2cbe3d6648bfd192d449475332f4d413d67b.camel@HIDDEN>
Subject: "guix shell -f guix2.scm" fails always
From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN>
To: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 22:47:29 +0200
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-JRmepqpAPXB51rnZfaN9"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.3-1 
MIME-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telenet.be; s=r22;
 t=1656449254; bh=f2yzeRmro0dP5vQhhlZczJGwjmCIvl2+DwcarlWYTZY=;
 h=Subject:From:To:Date;
 b=iMYx3I85L7nb4fV7TvsZBEkzOk6benV3hSPn2A080bzRHkU65M98H7XqD36MEqmmO
 xdkppS3DL5cJJ+RpqaLGWG+bnhmkQ2AW2f7+qneuwUoJ28fPfkoGWcltC+TMjn6e+o
 Ub4cdHP6fCokI8lrdbLSpnBVDrw7AUU4FvIVv/dpHwFlqP43anVxMTZAhUzsNm5EgG
 BlT4IoZ+/k8H0wivgbEiIV2oBOSbNNyL6EK0SBtesbEoVduDQdfIgGK/UBretl+Xt+
 7ycfbJ+Y2P62EAAyLOVc5vjQDtpQRRtntx9s7ZTLdTgyjPmNacdb6HvlBFnD1zPob1
 YATdXBpFnKeRA==
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:1800:120:4::f00:13;
 envelope-from=maximedevos@HIDDEN; helo=baptiste.telenet-ops.be
X-Spam_score_int: -27
X-Spam_score: -2.8
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)


--=-JRmepqpAPXB51rnZfaN9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Put the folllowing in "oops-guix.scm":

(use-modules (gnu packages))
(specifications->packages '("hello"))

then do: "guix shell -f oops-guix.scm" to make an environment
with "hello".  I get:

> guix shell: warning: no packages specified; creating an empty environment
$ which hello
> /home/regulator/.guix-profile/bin/hello # <-- not from the new environmen=
t!

Or even simpler: do "guix shell -f non-existing-file.scm":
> guix shell: warning: no packages specified; creating an empty environment

Looks like "-f" is ignored entirely?

Version information:
$ guix --version
guix (GNU Guix) 0

(Didn't there use to be a commit?  Is confirmed on #guix as
reproducible ...)

Greetings,
Maxime.


--=-JRmepqpAPXB51rnZfaN9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iI0EABYKADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYrto4RccbWF4aW1lZGV2
b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7vPQAQCt+X11kjsi1+l3E0l9KKA0kByc
2lgkTinhktYTA67phQD+PrdR1NA26wfsdvibSuL4vtdBklvC2z3PwScfKAU05Ag=
=bsAt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-JRmepqpAPXB51rnZfaN9--
Acknowledgement sent to Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN. Full text available.
Report forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#56289; Package guix. Full text available.
Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.
Last modified: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 10:00:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.