GNU logs - #61852, boring messages


Message sent to whatson@HIDDEN, bug-guix@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#61852: =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98scheme48-prescheme=E2=80=99?= is not reproducible
Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: whatson@HIDDEN, bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 21:04:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.61852.B.167753182112669 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: report 61852
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: 61852 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Andrew Whatson <whatson@HIDDEN>
X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@HIDDEN
X-Debbugs-Original-Xcc: Andrew Whatson <whatson@HIDDEN>
Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.167753182112669
          (code B ref -1); Mon, 27 Feb 2023 21:04:01 +0000
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2023 21:03:41 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48954 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1pWkeq-0003IF-Od
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 16:03:41 -0500
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:51978)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1pWkel-0003I3-Hd
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 16:03:39 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1pWkel-0003Yi-2N
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 16:03:35 -0500
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1pWkek-0006DD-Qd
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 16:03:34 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:Subject:To:From:in-reply-to:
 references; bh=KahzvBIvGNopJQXOeRJ/5RlIkxBF+W7qrZYOXNJpv0w=; b=fMzfCY8a5BnAAs
 der84UtYd+EiSNVn2vbGBRkHgiDItQpyZ9qpeUR/2irKW0S0ZCZsH99g9Jh6Clue6dpZBBeOmvRb3
 i2mAQqT5k0uHseaYSe5KdTjDZcyCn3ERuaMzQLcLgWtDhmMGh67wBZcsjssL0e3Q6mQartE/kh3ZD
 lZsRC+bv+xEGT28ZYaDzFYVeYSLcYNRsWCq5PLO85PLcosXWm9+W9AHH9J3cA/Zz02+LeNk0BuJgQ
 U+hzbu3N2aaiLHkkyhhqI2T8EUBkF5u7eazb9umq+vJE9VY6T49nQIliH4UckmatikCUHd8dv0iAe
 ZxFFLo/2YOpjoZRlT/DQ==;
Received: from 91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net ([91.160.117.201] helo=ribbon)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1pWkek-0003d1-EF
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 16:03:34 -0500
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/
X-Revolutionary-Date: Nonidi 9 =?UTF-8?Q?Vent=C3=B4se?= an 231 de la
 =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution,?= jour du Marsault
X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5
X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4  0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5
X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 22:03:32 +0100
Message-ID: <87zg8yhlcr.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Hi again Andrew,

It turns out that the package is not reproducible:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ ./pre-inst-env  guix challenge scheme48-prescheme
/gnu/store/qkby7f4nr3lxlm16zmswmka5hgfs6spw-scheme48-prescheme-1.9.2 conten=
ts differ:
  no local build for '/gnu/store/qkby7f4nr3lxlm16zmswmka5hgfs6spw-scheme48-=
prescheme-1.9.2'
  https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/qkby7f4nr3lxlm16zmswmka5hgfs6spw-scheme4=
8-prescheme-1.9.2: 0fahr4s5qz980zz96xmrwf8r87w56kicxr8s80fvis98q7v5czll
  https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/qkby7f4nr3lxlm16zmswmka5hgfs6spw-s=
cheme48-prescheme-1.9.2: 0jphmcmijk68phwq93qbzszy5pdmnasa3qdcp2nc5wqc25a7kp=
xk
  differing file:
    /lib/scheme48-1.9.2/prescheme.image

1 store items were analyzed:
  - 0 (0.0%) were identical
  - 1 (100.0%) differed
  - 0 (0.0%) were inconclusive
$ git log |head -1
commit cf9e0508b26196dc985302776d860a0359652c59
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Any idea what might be wrong?

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.




Message sent:


Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#61852: Acknowledgement (=?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98scheme48-prescheme=E2=80=99?=
 is not reproducible)
Message-ID: <handler.61852.B.167753182112669.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <87zg8yhlcr.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 61852
X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix
Reply-To: 61852 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 21:04:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

As you requested using X-Debbugs-CC, your message was also forwarded to
  Andrew Whatson <whatson@HIDDEN>
(after having been given a bug report number, if it did not have one).

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-guix@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 61852 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
61852: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D61852
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems


Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#61852: =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98scheme48-prescheme=E2=80=99?= is not reproducible
Resent-From: Andrew Whatson <whatson@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 08:35:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.61852.B61852.167757324420778 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61852
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>, 61852 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 61852-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B61852.167757324420778
          (code B ref 61852); Tue, 28 Feb 2023 08:35:01 +0000
Received: (at 61852) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Feb 2023 08:34:04 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49630 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1pWvQw-0005Oa-5I
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 03:34:03 -0500
Received: from reservoir.hosting-cloud.net ([103.146.113.7]:47789)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <whatson@HIDDEN>) id 1pWsxm-0000iz-Ec
 for 61852 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 00:55:50 -0500
X-Mailborder-Info: host=console.hosting-cloud.net, gmt_time=1677563742,
 scan_time=4.35s
X-Mailborder-Spam-Score: 2.2
X-Mailborder-Spam-X: xx
X-Mailborder-Spam-Report: URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS, ALL_TRUSTED, SPF_FAIL,
 DKIM_SIGNED, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS, DKIM_INVALID, MB_DMARC_FAIL,
 KAM_DMARC_QUARANTINE, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, NICE_REPLY_A, 
Received: from cp61.hosting-cloud.net (unknown [103.119.110.239])
 by smtp.hosting-cloud.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D4F37FC08;
 Tue, 28 Feb 2023 16:55:34 +1100 (AEDT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.hosting-cloud.net 3D4F37FC08
Authentication-Results: console.hosting-cloud.net;
 dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none)
 header.from=tailcall.au
Authentication-Results: console.hosting-cloud.net;
 spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=whatson@HIDDEN
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.hosting-cloud.net 3D4F37FC08
Authentication-Results: smtp.hosting-cloud.net;
 dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key;
 unprotected) header.d=tailcall.au header.i=@tailcall.au header.b="BFeaOJwx"; 
 dkim-atps=neutral
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tailcall.au
 ; s=x;
 h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:
 To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:
 Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc
 :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:
 List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
 bh=HHtOad9Gwr/F27j7b+CKo+tMZ9KUGo6lspT3hqvey/E=; b=BFeaOJwxvFTtwIhKaQ8/x3fqKS
 HfERluIheC6bjUr0dWwDZUCwrDo3aiuwP5EA8uCCDSOoRH5JZQoQ/S35Mzomt1S1pw+u+qrkWE/mZ
 9a0Av+pwgKHF92Kosw42B/AoFw8UdUyVvcGJPyR+F6huje7WR5YcyYi6/8oqAikOJw365PS2UyiHg
 w6Ha+ARrS22VGpeoe3BkHeJoeA/umWRoIt4vK3BMVaHMhfRnTzYS2TbbIxZke2/7DN1lkRZ9lir2e
 F/8K0WjKXmuQN6sbBRmUIhXeby8iXDpbNC8357ebl6H/0l8shHFH5cXPIqaM9j9SsTArSuIHdzMLc
 qbT+h3Fg==;
X-Spam-Status: No
X-HostingCloud-MailScanner-From: whatson@HIDDEN
X-HostingCloud-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached,
 score=-2.988, required 4, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00,
 BAYES_00 -1.90, NICE_REPLY_A -0.09, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS 0.00)
X-HostingCloud-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-HostingCloud-MailScanner-ID: 1pWsxR-00AtR3-1f
X-HostingCloud-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more
 information
Received: from eft1854679.lnk.telstra.net ([101.187.131.186] helo=[10.0.9.6])
 by cp61.hosting-cloud.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96)
 (envelope-from <whatson@HIDDEN>) id 1pWsxR-00AtR3-1f;
 Tue, 28 Feb 2023 16:55:25 +1100
Message-ID: <ce426348-bd75-a2ed-885b-92f1caf11f37@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 15:55:23 +1000
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.8.0
References: <87zg8yhlcr.fsf@HIDDEN>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Andrew Whatson <whatson@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87zg8yhlcr.fsf@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-AuthUser: whatson@HIDDEN
X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 03:34:01 -0500
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--)

Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi again Andrew,
> 
> It turns out that the package is not reproducible:
> 
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> $ ./pre-inst-env  guix challenge scheme48-prescheme
> /gnu/store/qkby7f4nr3lxlm16zmswmka5hgfs6spw-scheme48-prescheme-1.9.2 contents differ:
>    no local build for '/gnu/store/qkby7f4nr3lxlm16zmswmka5hgfs6spw-scheme48-prescheme-1.9.2'
>    https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/qkby7f4nr3lxlm16zmswmka5hgfs6spw-scheme48-prescheme-1.9.2: 0fahr4s5qz980zz96xmrwf8r87w56kicxr8s80fvis98q7v5czll
>    https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/qkby7f4nr3lxlm16zmswmka5hgfs6spw-scheme48-prescheme-1.9.2: 0jphmcmijk68phwq93qbzszy5pdmnasa3qdcp2nc5wqc25a7kpxk
>    differing file:
>      /lib/scheme48-1.9.2/prescheme.image
> 
> 1 store items were analyzed:
>    - 0 (0.0%) were identical
>    - 1 (100.0%) differed
>    - 0 (0.0%) were inconclusive
> $ git log |head -1
> commit cf9e0508b26196dc985302776d860a0359652c59
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> 
> Any idea what might be wrong?

Hmm, interesting!

This is an image produced by Scheme 48 dumping its VM state into a file 
which can be loaded later to save parsing/expansion time.  This is the 
same technique used by Scheme 48 to produce its own initial image.  It 
looks like the "scheme48" package has the same problem:

```
$ guix challenge scheme48
/gnu/store/9c47l5cn60zrr9sm0hn55zibf8zmv33l-scheme48-1.9.2 contents differ:
   local hash: 0pyygj4nf8fw2xpciy81d01r2b2339bxhgpfdn2zq2wqvsn2ycra
 
https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/9c47l5cn60zrr9sm0hn55zibf8zmv33l-scheme48-1.9.2: 
0pyygj4nf8fw2xpciy81d01r2b2339bxhgpfdn2zq2wqvsn2ycra
 
https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/9c47l5cn60zrr9sm0hn55zibf8zmv33l-scheme48-1.9.2: 
12wxxqxmpdqgg2fzbcbm68h1jqynz9gqhxzalyspqq7hh2fgr46k
   differing file:
     /lib/scheme48-1.9.2/scheme48.image

1 store items were analyzed:
   - 0 (0.0%) were identical
   - 1 (100.0%) differed
   - 0 (0.0%) were inconclusive
```

Comparing hex dumps of the files, there are significant differences, and 
a quick dive through the image dumping code leads into VM and garbage 
collector details which are over my head.

I guess patching Scheme 48 to build deterministic images is out-of-scope 
and maybe an issue for upstream.

> Thanks,
> Ludo’.

Cheers!
Andrew





Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#61852: =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98scheme48-prescheme=E2=80=99?= is not reproducible
Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2023 10:46:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.61852.B61852.167784031327965 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61852
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Andrew Whatson <whatson@HIDDEN>
Cc: 61852 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 61852-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B61852.167784031327965
          (code B ref 61852); Fri, 03 Mar 2023 10:46:02 +0000
Received: (at 61852) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Mar 2023 10:45:13 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59709 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1pY2uW-0007Gz-OU
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 05:45:13 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60436)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1pY2uU-0007Gk-Uv
 for 61852 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 05:45:11 -0500
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1pY2uN-0000aA-FD; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 05:45:03 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To:
 From; bh=CU69ecfKykzE87u0OZlo0G3RsaH5cfXbJNXzYfeZ9Ks=; b=TWtkMsxmsQ3cx0Vxa0xO
 /GBFCgjbYyxmoYLIqeDQHSKjI2lV9ng6U/NcT0pf/VYUvxEgo09VVnu2qR/ok+RTyej+AO6OJlo0t
 bS6FzVSkhMWXZf+OvhbNfaxML+X625emuXtG+NsETCpWXr+oEX43gd1StlyRD0mZTxQYubVkcHitW
 4z+rJE4bvO7cgpftub96eiDhlvDnLIVsh3y1pQcynzCfWNZfOLagfs+t9s5+ioAcPSJc69EQA7tGe
 S1N87YsG1Q08ZnsqrJQC1h6JxO3LJSTYFgNupCYXaz0534REphxQviZWsm0m4emI54RRdfX+qkBsC
 piMtZ1Q8RP0Hcg==;
Received: from [193.50.110.138] (helo=ribbon)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1pY2uM-0005Qr-Qi; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 05:45:03 -0500
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
References: <87zg8yhlcr.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <ce426348-bd75-a2ed-885b-92f1caf11f37@HIDDEN>
X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/
X-Revolutionary-Date: Tridi 13 =?UTF-8?Q?Vent=C3=B4se?= an 231 de la
 =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution,?= jour de la Fumeterre
X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5
X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4  0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5
X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2023 11:45:01 +0100
In-Reply-To: <ce426348-bd75-a2ed-885b-92f1caf11f37@HIDDEN> (Andrew
 Whatson's message of "Tue, 28 Feb 2023 15:55:23 +1000")
Message-ID: <878rgeyuz6.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Hi,

Andrew Whatson <whatson@HIDDEN> skribis:

> Comparing hex dumps of the files, there are significant differences,
> and a quick dive through the image dumping code leads into VM and
> garbage collector details which are over my head.
>
> I guess patching Scheme 48 to build deterministic images is
> out-of-scope and maybe an issue for upstream.

Yes, probably!  Would you mind reporting it upstream?

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.





Last modified: Fri, 3 Mar 2023 11:00:01 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.